A
Alias
Frank wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>
>> Leythos wrote:
>>
>>> In article <fult02$3p1$1@aioe.org>, iamalias@nukethisgmail.com says...
>>>
>>>> Leythos wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <ful6nt$8e6$2@aioe.org>, iamalias@removegmail.com says...
>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, Frank the Wank, has deserted that thread when I proved that
>>>>>> installing a printer and/or scanner on Ubuntu is MUCH easier than
>>>>>> Windows of any flavor. Interesting how when Frank the Wank is
>>>>>> refuted, he goes and hides in a corner, hoping no one will notice.
>>>>>
>>>>> BS, and many printers are not supported. I moved a distant family
>>>>> friend to Ubuntu about 4 months ago, and only 2 printers from
>>>>> BestBuy and Circuit city were supported in a LIMITED manner. Their
>>>>> older Epson printer was not supported, nor was their older Cannon
>>>>> fax/scanner/printer supported.
>>>>>
>>>>> I just installed a Okidata C5500 printer in my office, took about 2
>>>>> minutes, and it's printing just fine - the Ubuntu machine didn't
>>>>> even see it.
>>>>>
>>>> You can find printers and scanners that don't work with Vista. I
>>>> never said Okidata or Canon work with Ubuntu. I did say that the
>>>> Epsons and HPs that I have installed installed out of the box and
>>>> were much easier to install on Ubuntu than Windows. HP even
>>>> provides, by default, a control panel in Ubuntu.
>>>
>>>
>>> Alias, the fact remains that every printer that is sold in the common
>>> market at "Big Box" stores works with Vista right now, even the
>>> scanners work with them. Yes, I'm sure that you could dig up some 4
>>> year old scanner in the warehouse at BestBuy that was returned 2
>>> years ago, that doesn't work with vists, but that would be unlikely.
>>
>>
>> Not relevant.
>
> Most relevant.
>>
>>>
>>> I have installed Ubuntu many times, found that most printers that
>>> people have don't work with Ubuntu and the ones that do work are
>>> often limited in their special functions.
>>
>>
>> Like what "special features"? My HP has the same features with Ubuntu
>> that it has with XP.
>>
>>> It's nothing against Ubuntu, it's a good product, but it's not
>>> anywhere near as hardware friendly as Windows or even a MAC.
>>
>>
>> Like I said, to install a Linux friendly printer is easier than
>> installing the same printer on any flavor of Windows.
>
> That is simply not true. You're out of touch with reality. You don't
> have Vista, so you don't know. Stop lying!
I'm not lying. You are (again).
>>
>>>
>>> As for HP, I would never own an HP Color printer, they don't have the
>>> quality that many others have/provide - for a BW laser printer it's a
>>> given, HP wins, but the thread is about Ubuntu and printers/scanners,
>>> and that is an area that Ubuntu is very lacking in.
>>
>>
>> I'm very happy with my HP printer and scanner. It does everything I
>> need, be it with XP or Ubuntu.
>
> Good for you, huh?
> I guess you don't care about the millions using Canon and Epson right?
> Figures.
> Frank
Epson works just fine with Ubuntu. It's Canon's fault (and Lexmark's for
that matter) that they don't support Ubuntu. As more people switch to
Ubuntu, you will see more support from the likes of Canon and Lexmark.
Alias
> Alias wrote:
>
>> Leythos wrote:
>>
>>> In article <fult02$3p1$1@aioe.org>, iamalias@nukethisgmail.com says...
>>>
>>>> Leythos wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <ful6nt$8e6$2@aioe.org>, iamalias@removegmail.com says...
>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, Frank the Wank, has deserted that thread when I proved that
>>>>>> installing a printer and/or scanner on Ubuntu is MUCH easier than
>>>>>> Windows of any flavor. Interesting how when Frank the Wank is
>>>>>> refuted, he goes and hides in a corner, hoping no one will notice.
>>>>>
>>>>> BS, and many printers are not supported. I moved a distant family
>>>>> friend to Ubuntu about 4 months ago, and only 2 printers from
>>>>> BestBuy and Circuit city were supported in a LIMITED manner. Their
>>>>> older Epson printer was not supported, nor was their older Cannon
>>>>> fax/scanner/printer supported.
>>>>>
>>>>> I just installed a Okidata C5500 printer in my office, took about 2
>>>>> minutes, and it's printing just fine - the Ubuntu machine didn't
>>>>> even see it.
>>>>>
>>>> You can find printers and scanners that don't work with Vista. I
>>>> never said Okidata or Canon work with Ubuntu. I did say that the
>>>> Epsons and HPs that I have installed installed out of the box and
>>>> were much easier to install on Ubuntu than Windows. HP even
>>>> provides, by default, a control panel in Ubuntu.
>>>
>>>
>>> Alias, the fact remains that every printer that is sold in the common
>>> market at "Big Box" stores works with Vista right now, even the
>>> scanners work with them. Yes, I'm sure that you could dig up some 4
>>> year old scanner in the warehouse at BestBuy that was returned 2
>>> years ago, that doesn't work with vists, but that would be unlikely.
>>
>>
>> Not relevant.
>
> Most relevant.
>>
>>>
>>> I have installed Ubuntu many times, found that most printers that
>>> people have don't work with Ubuntu and the ones that do work are
>>> often limited in their special functions.
>>
>>
>> Like what "special features"? My HP has the same features with Ubuntu
>> that it has with XP.
>>
>>> It's nothing against Ubuntu, it's a good product, but it's not
>>> anywhere near as hardware friendly as Windows or even a MAC.
>>
>>
>> Like I said, to install a Linux friendly printer is easier than
>> installing the same printer on any flavor of Windows.
>
> That is simply not true. You're out of touch with reality. You don't
> have Vista, so you don't know. Stop lying!
I'm not lying. You are (again).
>>
>>>
>>> As for HP, I would never own an HP Color printer, they don't have the
>>> quality that many others have/provide - for a BW laser printer it's a
>>> given, HP wins, but the thread is about Ubuntu and printers/scanners,
>>> and that is an area that Ubuntu is very lacking in.
>>
>>
>> I'm very happy with my HP printer and scanner. It does everything I
>> need, be it with XP or Ubuntu.
>
> Good for you, huh?
> I guess you don't care about the millions using Canon and Epson right?
> Figures.
> Frank
Epson works just fine with Ubuntu. It's Canon's fault (and Lexmark's for
that matter) that they don't support Ubuntu. As more people switch to
Ubuntu, you will see more support from the likes of Canon and Lexmark.
Alias