Vista vs Linux

  • Thread starter Thread starter measekite
  • Start date Start date
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 19:57:17 +0200, Alias <iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com>
wrote:

>Bill M. Yanaire wrote:
>> "Alias" <iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:gae9qg$mbd$2@registered.motzarella.org...
>>> Bill M. Yanaire wrote:
>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:gabfjn$9lq$1@registered.motzarella.org...
>>>>> John Whitworth wrote:
>>>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:gabdc3$qb1$1@registered.motzarella.org...
>>>>>>> measekite wrote:
>>>>>>>> I wonder if now this ng can have a discussion on the merits of Vista
>>>>>>>> vs Linux.
>>>>>>> In between Frank's drivel, perhaps.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If so then I can see that printing and scanning are the items in
>>>>>>>> Vista favor. Everything else, except for some standardization of
>>>>>>>> where applications are stored (what folders) appears to be in favor
>>>>>>>> of Linux. There also appears to be less things in Linux that one
>>>>>>>> finds very annoying.
>>>>>>> I have an HP AllinONE and the printer took three clicks to install and
>>>>>>> the scanner was ready to scan with XSane once it found the scanner.
>>>>>>> Avoid Canon, Brother and Lexmark and you're good to go with Ubuntu.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>> Oooohh...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You were the helpful Linux guy I meant in my other post Alias! :-)
>>>>> I'm an XP and Linux guy. There's an XP sitting behind me running a virus
>>>>> scan as I type. Poor devils, it was chock full of blue meanies.
>>>>>
>>>> You are an XP guy hanging around in the vista group causing trouble.
>>> No, that would be Frank. Please try to keep up.
>>>
>>>> Try going to the Linux group and helping those sorry sacks who think
>>>> that Ubuntu is the greatest thing since sliced bread
>>> No need as there are plenty of folks there who know more about Ubuntu than
>>> I do who are helping people left and right. The newbie posters in this
>>> Vista group haven't heard of Ubuntu hence, my noble mission to spread the
>>> good word.
>>>
>>>> when in reality Ubuntu is just a toy OS for geeks who can't get laid.
>>> I'm not a geek and I get laid very regularly, I can assure you. Oops.
>>>
>>> Alias
>>
>> Were not talking Sheep here. That doesn't count.
>>
>>
>>
>
>You're right, I'm not talking sheep or anything but female humans and,
>brother, they DO count. I'm an old bohemian (before the hippies made the
>scene) and in the sixties, seventies and early eighties, all we did is
>get laid. I remember getting laid by four different ladies in the same
>night back then. At Woodstock, I lost count. Course, AIDS put that to a
>screeching halt. Ah, those were the days, my friend we thought they'd
>never end ...
>
>Alias

The only way Yanaire gets "laid" is if he takes his blow up sex doll
out of the closet and crawls up on it and grunts until he pees. He
thinks that's "cuming".
 
Leythos wrote:
> In article <gae9md$mbd$1@registered.motzarella.org>,
> iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com says...
>> Leythos wrote:
>>> In article <gabfjn$9lq$1@registered.motzarella.org>,
>>> iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com says...
>>>> Well, if you need super high quality printing, perhaps Canon is better
>>>> I don't know. I just did some posters with HP on photographic paper and
>>>> it looked as professional as when you take it to a printer and I don't
>>>> have a high end HP by any means.
>>>>
>>> But that's where your lack of stated experience shows.
>> It looks like it was made at a print shop :p
>
> Again, to your eye, which we've seen, from your comments, has limited
> experience in the computer world.
>
>>> HP makes AVERAGE color printers, nothing super good, and other vendors
>>> do.
>> So what?
>
> So, you said that users would be happy as long as they stayed away from
> some major players in the market, and Cannon has always had better color
> quality than HP. You lack of experience shows that you don't really know
> enough to make general statements about Vista or Linux or XP even.
>
>>> You're also posting in a Vista group and you're not contributing to
>>> VISTA, you're pushing Linux and you were even pushing it before you had
>>> even installed Vista.
>> Don't like it? Live with it and try to get over it. Suggesting Ubuntu to
>> Vista users is doing them a big favor.
>
> Except that most people that run vista get it preinstalled with a set of
> applications that they can use, others buy MS Office or MS Works as an
> add-on, often pre-installed, printers and other hardware doesn't require
> any effort to get installed unless it's OLD. Few people that buy vista
> could change the OS to Ubuntu or other versions of Linux with much
> success and then still be able to work or do the same things they did
> before. You are not helping them by pretending that it's easy.
>

Yawn. You don't know what you're talking about.

Alias
 
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 10:57:41 -0700, "Bill M. Yanaire"
<Bill@yanaire.com> wrote:

>
>"Alias" <iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
>news:gaeaai$mbd$6@registered.motzarella.org...
>> Bill M. Yanaire wrote:
>>> "Alias" <iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:gae9md$mbd$1@registered.motzarella.org...
>>>> Leythos wrote:
>>>>> In article <gabfjn$9lq$1@registered.motzarella.org>,
>>>>> iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com says...
>>>>>> Well, if you need super high quality printing, perhaps Canon is
>>>>>> better I don't know. I just did some posters with HP on photographic
>>>>>> paper and it looked as professional as when you take it to a printer
>>>>>> and I don't have a high end HP by any means.
>>>>>>
>>>>> But that's where your lack of stated experience shows.
>>>> It looks like it was made at a print shop :p
>>>>
>>>>> HP makes AVERAGE color printers, nothing super good, and other vendors
>>>>> do.
>>>> So what?
>>>>
>>>>> You're also posting in a Vista group and you're not contributing to
>>>>> VISTA, you're pushing Linux and you were even pushing it before you had
>>>>> even installed Vista.
>>>> Don't like it? Live with it and try to get over it. Suggesting Ubuntu to
>>>> Vista users is doing them a big favor.
>>>>
>>>> Alias
>>>
>>> Just like suggesting an enema to a swimmer.
>>>
>>> Get over it. Ubuntu is nothing more than a toy OS designed for geeks by
>>> geeks who can't get laid. Anyone who needs to do real work needs a real
>>> OS like Windows. Everybody knows it but you are too thick to realize
>>> that you are just annoying people here (not me because I can deal with
>>> idiots like yourself)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Translation: Yanaire's too stupid to install, configure and use Ubuntu. I
>> know quite a lot of Ubuntu users and none of them are geeks and almost all
>> of them get laid on a regular basis. Ergo, you're lying again.
>>
>> Alias
>
>I have installed Ubuntu and decided that it doesn't run any useful program.
>Ubuntu is just a toy OS and everyone knows it. Imagine, Ubuntu is FREE and
>hardly anyone uses it. That should tell you all you need to know about
>Ubuntu.

Google shows some jackass named Yanaire praising Ubuntu and admitting
Vista sometimes sucks. Funny how assholes like you forget what you
wrote. Google never forgets.
 
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 11:02:12 -0700, "Bill M. Yanaire"
<Bill@yanaire.com> wrote:

>
>"Alias" <iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
>news:gaeahv$ro6$1@registered.motzarella.org...
>> Bill M. Yanaire wrote:
>>> "Alias" <iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:gae9qg$mbd$2@registered.motzarella.org...
>>>> Bill M. Yanaire wrote:
>>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:gabfjn$9lq$1@registered.motzarella.org...
>>>>>> John Whitworth wrote:
>>>>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:gabdc3$qb1$1@registered.motzarella.org...
>>>>>>>> measekite wrote:
>>>>>>>>> I wonder if now this ng can have a discussion on the merits of
>>>>>>>>> Vista vs Linux.
>>>>>>>> In between Frank's drivel, perhaps.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If so then I can see that printing and scanning are the items in
>>>>>>>>> Vista favor. Everything else, except for some standardization of
>>>>>>>>> where applications are stored (what folders) appears to be in favor
>>>>>>>>> of Linux. There also appears to be less things in Linux that one
>>>>>>>>> finds very annoying.
>>>>>>>> I have an HP AllinONE and the printer took three clicks to install
>>>>>>>> and the scanner was ready to scan with XSane once it found the
>>>>>>>> scanner. Avoid Canon, Brother and Lexmark and you're good to go with
>>>>>>>> Ubuntu.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>> Oooohh...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You were the helpful Linux guy I meant in my other post Alias! :-)
>>>>>> I'm an XP and Linux guy. There's an XP sitting behind me running a
>>>>>> virus scan as I type. Poor devils, it was chock full of blue meanies.
>>>>>>
>>>>> You are an XP guy hanging around in the vista group causing trouble.
>>>> No, that would be Frank. Please try to keep up.
>>>>
>>>>> Try going to the Linux group and helping those sorry sacks who think
>>>>> that Ubuntu is the greatest thing since sliced bread
>>>> No need as there are plenty of folks there who know more about Ubuntu
>>>> than I do who are helping people left and right. The newbie posters in
>>>> this Vista group haven't heard of Ubuntu hence, my noble mission to
>>>> spread the good word.
>>>>
>>>>> when in reality Ubuntu is just a toy OS for geeks who can't get laid.
>>>> I'm not a geek and I get laid very regularly, I can assure you. Oops.
>>>>
>>>> Alias
>>>
>>> Were not talking Sheep here. That doesn't count.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> You're right, I'm not talking sheep or anything but female humans and,
>> brother, they DO count. I'm an old bohemian (before the hippies made the
>> scene) and in the sixties, seventies and early eighties, all we did is get
>> laid. I remember getting laid by four different ladies in the same night
>> back then. At Woodstock, I lost count. Course, AIDS put that to a
>> screeching halt. Ah, those were the days, my friend we thought they'd
>> never end ...
>>
>> Alias
>
>I was too young to go to Woodstock but my old girlfriends sister went to
>Woodstock. If you had a dick, you could get laid at Woodstock.
>
>I got plenty of "tail" in the 70's and early 80's until I got married. I
>still get plenty of tail but from the wife.

You just got done bragging you were out of town for 4 days and
screwing around. One thing sure about the Yanaire jackass, he always
makes a damn fool of himself.
 
"Ringmaster" <bigtop@VistaGeneralCircus.net> wrote in message
news:h0clc4hgj2pkfhg9aqmls3mb3i5lf0sn9i@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 11:02:12 -0700, "Bill M. Yanaire"
> <Bill@yanaire.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Alias" <iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:gaeahv$ro6$1@registered.motzarella.org...
>>> Bill M. Yanaire wrote:
>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:gae9qg$mbd$2@registered.motzarella.org...
>>>>> Bill M. Yanaire wrote:
>>>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:gabfjn$9lq$1@registered.motzarella.org...
>>>>>>> John Whitworth wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:gabdc3$qb1$1@registered.motzarella.org...
>>>>>>>>> measekite wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> I wonder if now this ng can have a discussion on the merits of
>>>>>>>>>> Vista vs Linux.
>>>>>>>>> In between Frank's drivel, perhaps.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If so then I can see that printing and scanning are the items in
>>>>>>>>>> Vista favor. Everything else, except for some standardization of
>>>>>>>>>> where applications are stored (what folders) appears to be in
>>>>>>>>>> favor
>>>>>>>>>> of Linux. There also appears to be less things in Linux that one
>>>>>>>>>> finds very annoying.
>>>>>>>>> I have an HP AllinONE and the printer took three clicks to install
>>>>>>>>> and the scanner was ready to scan with XSane once it found the
>>>>>>>>> scanner. Avoid Canon, Brother and Lexmark and you're good to go
>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>> Ubuntu.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>>> Oooohh...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You were the helpful Linux guy I meant in my other post Alias! :-)
>>>>>>> I'm an XP and Linux guy. There's an XP sitting behind me running a
>>>>>>> virus scan as I type. Poor devils, it was chock full of blue
>>>>>>> meanies.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> You are an XP guy hanging around in the vista group causing trouble.
>>>>> No, that would be Frank. Please try to keep up.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Try going to the Linux group and helping those sorry sacks who think
>>>>>> that Ubuntu is the greatest thing since sliced bread
>>>>> No need as there are plenty of folks there who know more about Ubuntu
>>>>> than I do who are helping people left and right. The newbie posters in
>>>>> this Vista group haven't heard of Ubuntu hence, my noble mission to
>>>>> spread the good word.
>>>>>
>>>>>> when in reality Ubuntu is just a toy OS for geeks who can't get laid.
>>>>> I'm not a geek and I get laid very regularly, I can assure you. Oops.
>>>>>
>>>>> Alias
>>>>
>>>> Were not talking Sheep here. That doesn't count.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> You're right, I'm not talking sheep or anything but female humans and,
>>> brother, they DO count. I'm an old bohemian (before the hippies made the
>>> scene) and in the sixties, seventies and early eighties, all we did is
>>> get
>>> laid. I remember getting laid by four different ladies in the same night
>>> back then. At Woodstock, I lost count. Course, AIDS put that to a
>>> screeching halt. Ah, those were the days, my friend we thought they'd
>>> never end ...
>>>
>>> Alias
>>
>>I was too young to go to Woodstock but my old girlfriends sister went to
>>Woodstock. If you had a dick, you could get laid at Woodstock.
>>
>>I got plenty of "tail" in the 70's and early 80's until I got married. I
>>still get plenty of tail but from the wife.
>
> You just got done bragging you were out of town for 4 days and
> screwing around. One thing sure about the Yanaire jackass, he always
> makes a damn fool of himself.
>

I was answering an idiot. Oh, I am answering another idiot. Nobody said
that everything that's posted needs to be true. Write that down for future
reference.

I was out of town on business and didn't screw around. Now you have two
conflicting statements. Believe the one you want.

Have a nice day.
 
"Ringmaster" <bigtop@VistaGeneralCircus.net> wrote in message
news:hlblc4hk7vu1bo1q1avovtc4itggu3nhnh@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 19:57:17 +0200, Alias <iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>Bill M. Yanaire wrote:
>>> "Alias" <iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:gae9qg$mbd$2@registered.motzarella.org...
>>>> Bill M. Yanaire wrote:
>>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:gabfjn$9lq$1@registered.motzarella.org...
>>>>>> John Whitworth wrote:
>>>>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:gabdc3$qb1$1@registered.motzarella.org...
>>>>>>>> measekite wrote:
>>>>>>>>> I wonder if now this ng can have a discussion on the merits of
>>>>>>>>> Vista
>>>>>>>>> vs Linux.
>>>>>>>> In between Frank's drivel, perhaps.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If so then I can see that printing and scanning are the items in
>>>>>>>>> Vista favor. Everything else, except for some standardization of
>>>>>>>>> where applications are stored (what folders) appears to be in
>>>>>>>>> favor
>>>>>>>>> of Linux. There also appears to be less things in Linux that one
>>>>>>>>> finds very annoying.
>>>>>>>> I have an HP AllinONE and the printer took three clicks to install
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> the scanner was ready to scan with XSane once it found the scanner.
>>>>>>>> Avoid Canon, Brother and Lexmark and you're good to go with Ubuntu.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>> Oooohh...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You were the helpful Linux guy I meant in my other post Alias! :-)
>>>>>> I'm an XP and Linux guy. There's an XP sitting behind me running a
>>>>>> virus
>>>>>> scan as I type. Poor devils, it was chock full of blue meanies.
>>>>>>
>>>>> You are an XP guy hanging around in the vista group causing trouble.
>>>> No, that would be Frank. Please try to keep up.
>>>>
>>>>> Try going to the Linux group and helping those sorry sacks who think
>>>>> that Ubuntu is the greatest thing since sliced bread
>>>> No need as there are plenty of folks there who know more about Ubuntu
>>>> than
>>>> I do who are helping people left and right. The newbie posters in this
>>>> Vista group haven't heard of Ubuntu hence, my noble mission to spread
>>>> the
>>>> good word.
>>>>
>>>>> when in reality Ubuntu is just a toy OS for geeks who can't get laid.
>>>> I'm not a geek and I get laid very regularly, I can assure you. Oops.
>>>>
>>>> Alias
>>>
>>> Were not talking Sheep here. That doesn't count.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>You're right, I'm not talking sheep or anything but female humans and,
>>brother, they DO count. I'm an old bohemian (before the hippies made the
>>scene) and in the sixties, seventies and early eighties, all we did is
>>get laid. I remember getting laid by four different ladies in the same
>>night back then. At Woodstock, I lost count. Course, AIDS put that to a
>>screeching halt. Ah, those were the days, my friend we thought they'd
>>never end ...
>>
>>Alias
>
> The only way Yanaire gets "laid" is if he takes his blow up sex doll
> out of the closet and crawls up on it and grunts until he pees. He
> thinks that's "cuming".

Sorry to disappoint. I don't have the "Adam Albright manual on
relationships". Try again.
 
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 13:33:20 -0400, Leythos wrote:

> In article <gabdc3$qb1$1@registered.motzarella.org>,
> iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com says...
>> I have an HP AllinONE and the printer took three clicks to install and
>> the scanner was ready to scan with XSane once it found the scanner.
>> Avoid Canon, Brother and Lexmark and you're good to go with Ubuntu.
>>
>>
> That's a LARGE part of the market to avoid just to use a FREE operating
> system.

Please see comment above. Canon support sucks because Canon will not
support Linux at all. I've had no problems with other printers/scanners
and I understand that there are now Linux drivers for many Canon printers
- in spite of Canon.
 
"ray" <ray@zianet.com> wrote in message
news:6ivpvbFotc2U3@mid.individual.net...
> On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 13:33:20 -0400, Leythos wrote:
>
>> In article <gabdc3$qb1$1@registered.motzarella.org>,
>> iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com says...
>>> I have an HP AllinONE and the printer took three clicks to install and
>>> the scanner was ready to scan with XSane once it found the scanner.
>>> Avoid Canon, Brother and Lexmark and you're good to go with Ubuntu.
>>>
>>>
>> That's a LARGE part of the market to avoid just to use a FREE operating
>> system.
>
> Please see comment above. Canon support sucks because Canon will not
> support Linux at all. I've had no problems with other printers/scanners
> and I understand that there are now Linux drivers for many Canon printers
> - in spite of Canon.

Canon is smart. No need to support Linux for 10 users. Linux/Ubuntu is
written by geeks for geeks who can't get laid. What company needs to put
money into development for that piece of Crap Ubuntu?
 
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 11:18:03 -0700, "Bill M. Yanaire"
<Bill@yanaire.com> wrote:

>
>"ray" <ray@zianet.com> wrote in message
>news:6ivpvbFotc2U3@mid.individual.net...
>> On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 13:33:20 -0400, Leythos wrote:
>>
>>> In article <gabdc3$qb1$1@registered.motzarella.org>,
>>> iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com says...
>>>> I have an HP AllinONE and the printer took three clicks to install and
>>>> the scanner was ready to scan with XSane once it found the scanner.
>>>> Avoid Canon, Brother and Lexmark and you're good to go with Ubuntu.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> That's a LARGE part of the market to avoid just to use a FREE operating
>>> system.
>>
>> Please see comment above. Canon support sucks because Canon will not
>> support Linux at all. I've had no problems with other printers/scanners
>> and I understand that there are now Linux drivers for many Canon printers
>> - in spite of Canon.
>
>Canon is smart. No need to support Linux for 10 users. Linux/Ubuntu is
>written by geeks for geeks who can't get laid. What company needs to put
>money into development for that piece of Crap Ubuntu?

This must be one of those times Yanaire is lying. The dork admits he
lies constantly.
>
>
 
Bill M. Yanaire wrote:
> "Alias" <iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
> news:gaeaai$mbd$6@registered.motzarella.org...
>> Bill M. Yanaire wrote:
>>> "Alias" <iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:gae9md$mbd$1@registered.motzarella.org...
>>>> Leythos wrote:
>>>>> In article <gabfjn$9lq$1@registered.motzarella.org>,
>>>>> iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com says...
>>>>>> Well, if you need super high quality printing, perhaps Canon is
>>>>>> better I don't know. I just did some posters with HP on photographic
>>>>>> paper and it looked as professional as when you take it to a printer
>>>>>> and I don't have a high end HP by any means.
>>>>>>
>>>>> But that's where your lack of stated experience shows.
>>>> It looks like it was made at a print shop :p
>>>>
>>>>> HP makes AVERAGE color printers, nothing super good, and other vendors
>>>>> do.
>>>> So what?
>>>>
>>>>> You're also posting in a Vista group and you're not contributing to
>>>>> VISTA, you're pushing Linux and you were even pushing it before you had
>>>>> even installed Vista.
>>>> Don't like it? Live with it and try to get over it. Suggesting Ubuntu to
>>>> Vista users is doing them a big favor.
>>>>
>>>> Alias
>>> Just like suggesting an enema to a swimmer.
>>>
>>> Get over it. Ubuntu is nothing more than a toy OS designed for geeks by
>>> geeks who can't get laid. Anyone who needs to do real work needs a real
>>> OS like Windows. Everybody knows it but you are too thick to realize
>>> that you are just annoying people here (not me because I can deal with
>>> idiots like yourself)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Translation: Yanaire's too stupid to install, configure and use Ubuntu. I
>> know quite a lot of Ubuntu users and none of them are geeks and almost all
>> of them get laid on a regular basis. Ergo, you're lying again.
>>
>> Alias
>
> I have installed Ubuntu and decided that it doesn't run any useful program.

Like I said, you're too stupid to use it properly but what else is new?

> Ubuntu is just a toy OS and everyone knows it. Imagine, Ubuntu is FREE and
> hardly anyone uses it.

A lie.

> That should tell you all you need to know about
> Ubuntu.

It doesn't say anything about Ubuntu but it says volumes about you.

Alias
>
>
>
 
In article <gaeb0o$tin$3@registered.motzarella.org>,
iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com says...
> Leythos wrote:
> > In article <gae9md$mbd$1@registered.motzarella.org>,
> > iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com says...
> >> Leythos wrote:
> >>> In article <gabfjn$9lq$1@registered.motzarella.org>,
> >>> iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com says...
> >>>> Well, if you need super high quality printing, perhaps Canon is better
> >>>> I don't know. I just did some posters with HP on photographic paper and
> >>>> it looked as professional as when you take it to a printer and I don't
> >>>> have a high end HP by any means.
> >>>>
> >>> But that's where your lack of stated experience shows.
> >> It looks like it was made at a print shop :p
> >
> > Again, to your eye, which we've seen, from your comments, has limited
> > experience in the computer world.
> >
> >>> HP makes AVERAGE color printers, nothing super good, and other vendors
> >>> do.
> >> So what?
> >
> > So, you said that users would be happy as long as they stayed away from
> > some major players in the market, and Cannon has always had better color
> > quality than HP. You lack of experience shows that you don't really know
> > enough to make general statements about Vista or Linux or XP even.
> >
> >>> You're also posting in a Vista group and you're not contributing to
> >>> VISTA, you're pushing Linux and you were even pushing it before you had
> >>> even installed Vista.
> >> Don't like it? Live with it and try to get over it. Suggesting Ubuntu to
> >> Vista users is doing them a big favor.
> >
> > Except that most people that run vista get it preinstalled with a set of
> > applications that they can use, others buy MS Office or MS Works as an
> > add-on, often pre-installed, printers and other hardware doesn't require
> > any effort to get installed unless it's OLD. Few people that buy vista
> > could change the OS to Ubuntu or other versions of Linux with much
> > success and then still be able to work or do the same things they did
> > before. You are not helping them by pretending that it's easy.
> >
>
> Yawn. You don't know what you're talking about.

Yes, I do, as I have been working with Unix and Windows for decades as
well as Linux and with PEOPLE.

--
- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)
 
Bill M. Yanaire wrote:
> "Alias" <iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
> news:gaeahv$ro6$1@registered.motzarella.org...
>> Bill M. Yanaire wrote:
>>> "Alias" <iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:gae9qg$mbd$2@registered.motzarella.org...
>>>> Bill M. Yanaire wrote:
>>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:gabfjn$9lq$1@registered.motzarella.org...
>>>>>> John Whitworth wrote:
>>>>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:gabdc3$qb1$1@registered.motzarella.org...
>>>>>>>> measekite wrote:
>>>>>>>>> I wonder if now this ng can have a discussion on the merits of
>>>>>>>>> Vista vs Linux.
>>>>>>>> In between Frank's drivel, perhaps.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If so then I can see that printing and scanning are the items in
>>>>>>>>> Vista favor. Everything else, except for some standardization of
>>>>>>>>> where applications are stored (what folders) appears to be in favor
>>>>>>>>> of Linux. There also appears to be less things in Linux that one
>>>>>>>>> finds very annoying.
>>>>>>>> I have an HP AllinONE and the printer took three clicks to install
>>>>>>>> and the scanner was ready to scan with XSane once it found the
>>>>>>>> scanner. Avoid Canon, Brother and Lexmark and you're good to go with
>>>>>>>> Ubuntu.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>> Oooohh...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You were the helpful Linux guy I meant in my other post Alias! :-)
>>>>>> I'm an XP and Linux guy. There's an XP sitting behind me running a
>>>>>> virus scan as I type. Poor devils, it was chock full of blue meanies.
>>>>>>
>>>>> You are an XP guy hanging around in the vista group causing trouble.
>>>> No, that would be Frank. Please try to keep up.
>>>>
>>>>> Try going to the Linux group and helping those sorry sacks who think
>>>>> that Ubuntu is the greatest thing since sliced bread
>>>> No need as there are plenty of folks there who know more about Ubuntu
>>>> than I do who are helping people left and right. The newbie posters in
>>>> this Vista group haven't heard of Ubuntu hence, my noble mission to
>>>> spread the good word.
>>>>
>>>>> when in reality Ubuntu is just a toy OS for geeks who can't get laid.
>>>> I'm not a geek and I get laid very regularly, I can assure you. Oops.
>>>>
>>>> Alias
>>> Were not talking Sheep here. That doesn't count.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> You're right, I'm not talking sheep or anything but female humans and,
>> brother, they DO count. I'm an old bohemian (before the hippies made the
>> scene) and in the sixties, seventies and early eighties, all we did is get
>> laid. I remember getting laid by four different ladies in the same night
>> back then. At Woodstock, I lost count. Course, AIDS put that to a
>> screeching halt. Ah, those were the days, my friend we thought they'd
>> never end ...
>>
>> Alias
>
> I was too young to go to Woodstock but my old girlfriends sister went to
> Woodstock. If you had a dick, you could get laid at Woodstock.

So, are you saying that those ladies who don't have a dick didn't get laid?

>
> I got plenty of "tail" in the 70's and early 80's until I got married. I
> still get plenty of tail but from the wife.

This is more information than we really need.

Alias
>
>
>
 
Bill M. Yanaire wrote:
> "Alias" <iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
> news:gaeahv$ro6$1@registered.motzarella.org...
>> Bill M. Yanaire wrote:
>>> "Alias" <iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:gae9qg$mbd$2@registered.motzarella.org...
>>>> Bill M. Yanaire wrote:
>>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:gabfjn$9lq$1@registered.motzarella.org...
>>>>>> John Whitworth wrote:
>>>>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:gabdc3$qb1$1@registered.motzarella.org...
>>>>>>>> measekite wrote:
>>>>>>>>> I wonder if now this ng can have a discussion on the merits of
>>>>>>>>> Vista vs Linux.
>>>>>>>> In between Frank's drivel, perhaps.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If so then I can see that printing and scanning are the items in
>>>>>>>>> Vista favor. Everything else, except for some standardization of
>>>>>>>>> where applications are stored (what folders) appears to be in favor
>>>>>>>>> of Linux. There also appears to be less things in Linux that one
>>>>>>>>> finds very annoying.
>>>>>>>> I have an HP AllinONE and the printer took three clicks to install
>>>>>>>> and the scanner was ready to scan with XSane once it found the
>>>>>>>> scanner. Avoid Canon, Brother and Lexmark and you're good to go with
>>>>>>>> Ubuntu.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>> Oooohh...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You were the helpful Linux guy I meant in my other post Alias! :-)
>>>>>> I'm an XP and Linux guy. There's an XP sitting behind me running a
>>>>>> virus scan as I type. Poor devils, it was chock full of blue meanies.
>>>>>>
>>>>> You are an XP guy hanging around in the vista group causing trouble.
>>>> No, that would be Frank. Please try to keep up.
>>>>
>>>>> Try going to the Linux group and helping those sorry sacks who think
>>>>> that Ubuntu is the greatest thing since sliced bread
>>>> No need as there are plenty of folks there who know more about Ubuntu
>>>> than I do who are helping people left and right. The newbie posters in
>>>> this Vista group haven't heard of Ubuntu hence, my noble mission to
>>>> spread the good word.
>>>>
>>>>> when in reality Ubuntu is just a toy OS for geeks who can't get laid.
>>>> I'm not a geek and I get laid very regularly, I can assure you. Oops.
>>>>
>>>> Alias
>>> Were not talking Sheep here. That doesn't count.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> You're right, I'm not talking sheep or anything but female humans and,
>> brother, they DO count. I'm an old bohemian (before the hippies made the
>> scene) and in the sixties, seventies and early eighties, all we did is get
>> laid. I remember getting laid by four different ladies in the same night
>> back then. At Woodstock, I lost count. Course, AIDS put that to a
>> screeching halt. Ah, those were the days, my friend we thought they'd
>> never end ...
>>
>> Alias
>
> I was too young to go to Woodstock but my old girlfriends sister went to
> Woodstock. If you had a dick, you could get laid at Woodstock.
>
> I got plenty of "tail" in the 70's and early 80's until I got married. I
> still get plenty of tail but from the wife.
>
>
>

My wife just says BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
 
Bill M. Yanaire wrote:
> "Alias" <iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
> news:gaeaai$mbd$6@registered.motzarella.org...
>> Bill M. Yanaire wrote:
>>> "Alias" <iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:gae9md$mbd$1@registered.motzarella.org...
>>>> Leythos wrote:
>>>>> In article <gabfjn$9lq$1@registered.motzarella.org>,
>>>>> iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com says...
>>>>>> Well, if you need super high quality printing, perhaps Canon is
>>>>>> better I don't know. I just did some posters with HP on photographic
>>>>>> paper and it looked as professional as when you take it to a printer
>>>>>> and I don't have a high end HP by any means.
>>>>>>
>>>>> But that's where your lack of stated experience shows.
>>>> It looks like it was made at a print shop :p
>>>>
>>>>> HP makes AVERAGE color printers, nothing super good, and other vendors
>>>>> do.
>>>> So what?
>>>>
>>>>> You're also posting in a Vista group and you're not contributing to
>>>>> VISTA, you're pushing Linux and you were even pushing it before you had
>>>>> even installed Vista.
>>>> Don't like it? Live with it and try to get over it. Suggesting Ubuntu to
>>>> Vista users is doing them a big favor.
>>>>
>>>> Alias
>>> Just like suggesting an enema to a swimmer.
>>>
>>> Get over it. Ubuntu is nothing more than a toy OS designed for geeks by
>>> geeks who can't get laid. Anyone who needs to do real work needs a real
>>> OS like Windows. Everybody knows it but you are too thick to realize
>>> that you are just annoying people here (not me because I can deal with
>>> idiots like yourself)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Translation: Yanaire's too stupid to install, configure and use Ubuntu. I
>> know quite a lot of Ubuntu users and none of them are geeks and almost all
>> of them get laid on a regular basis. Ergo, you're lying again.
>>
>> Alias
>
> I have installed Ubuntu and decided that it doesn't run any useful program.
> Ubuntu is just a toy OS and everyone knows it. Imagine, Ubuntu is FREE and
> hardly anyone uses it. That should tell you all you need to know about
> Ubuntu.
>
>
>

It has a purty desktop
 
Bill M. Yanaire wrote:
> "Alias" <iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
> news:gae9qg$mbd$2@registered.motzarella.org...
>> Bill M. Yanaire wrote:
>>> "Alias" <iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:gabfjn$9lq$1@registered.motzarella.org...
>>>> John Whitworth wrote:
>>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:gabdc3$qb1$1@registered.motzarella.org...
>>>>>> measekite wrote:
>>>>>>> I wonder if now this ng can have a discussion on the merits of Vista
>>>>>>> vs Linux.
>>>>>> In between Frank's drivel, perhaps.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If so then I can see that printing and scanning are the items in
>>>>>>> Vista favor. Everything else, except for some standardization of
>>>>>>> where applications are stored (what folders) appears to be in favor
>>>>>>> of Linux. There also appears to be less things in Linux that one
>>>>>>> finds very annoying.
>>>>>> I have an HP AllinONE and the printer took three clicks to install and
>>>>>> the scanner was ready to scan with XSane once it found the scanner.
>>>>>> Avoid Canon, Brother and Lexmark and you're good to go with Ubuntu.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alias
>>>>> Oooohh...
>>>>>
>>>>> You were the helpful Linux guy I meant in my other post Alias! :-)
>>>> I'm an XP and Linux guy. There's an XP sitting behind me running a virus
>>>> scan as I type. Poor devils, it was chock full of blue meanies.
>>>>
>>> You are an XP guy hanging around in the vista group causing trouble.
>> No, that would be Frank. Please try to keep up.
>>
>>> Try going to the Linux group and helping those sorry sacks who think
>>> that Ubuntu is the greatest thing since sliced bread
>> No need as there are plenty of folks there who know more about Ubuntu than
>> I do who are helping people left and right. The newbie posters in this
>> Vista group haven't heard of Ubuntu hence, my noble mission to spread the
>> good word.
>>
>>> when in reality Ubuntu is just a toy OS for geeks who can't get laid.
>> I'm not a geek and I get laid very regularly, I can assure you. Oops.
>>
>> Alias
>
> Were not talking Sheep here. That doesn't count.
>
>
>

Well I was. Sheeps are my peeps.
 
Leythos wrote:
> In article <gaeb0o$tin$3@registered.motzarella.org>,
> iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com says...
>> Leythos wrote:
>>> In article <gae9md$mbd$1@registered.motzarella.org>,
>>> iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com says...
>>>> Leythos wrote:
>>>>> In article <gabfjn$9lq$1@registered.motzarella.org>,
>>>>> iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com says...
>>>>>> Well, if you need super high quality printing, perhaps Canon is better
>>>>>> I don't know. I just did some posters with HP on photographic paper and
>>>>>> it looked as professional as when you take it to a printer and I don't
>>>>>> have a high end HP by any means.
>>>>>>
>>>>> But that's where your lack of stated experience shows.
>>>> It looks like it was made at a print shop :p
>>> Again, to your eye, which we've seen, from your comments, has limited
>>> experience in the computer world.
>>>
>>>>> HP makes AVERAGE color printers, nothing super good, and other vendors
>>>>> do.
>>>> So what?
>>> So, you said that users would be happy as long as they stayed away from
>>> some major players in the market, and Cannon has always had better color
>>> quality than HP. You lack of experience shows that you don't really know
>>> enough to make general statements about Vista or Linux or XP even.
>>>
>>>>> You're also posting in a Vista group and you're not contributing to
>>>>> VISTA, you're pushing Linux and you were even pushing it before you had
>>>>> even installed Vista.
>>>> Don't like it? Live with it and try to get over it. Suggesting Ubuntu to
>>>> Vista users is doing them a big favor.
>>> Except that most people that run vista get it preinstalled with a set of
>>> applications that they can use, others buy MS Office or MS Works as an
>>> add-on, often pre-installed, printers and other hardware doesn't require
>>> any effort to get installed unless it's OLD. Few people that buy vista
>>> could change the OS to Ubuntu or other versions of Linux with much
>>> success and then still be able to work or do the same things they did
>>> before. You are not helping them by pretending that it's easy.
>>>
>> Yawn. You don't know what you're talking about.
>
> Yes, I do, as I have been working with Unix and Windows for decades as
> well as Linux and with PEOPLE.
>

I don't believe you.

Alias
 
Alias wrote:
> Leythos wrote:
>
>> In article <gaeb0o$tin$3@registered.motzarella.org>,
>> iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com says...
>>
>>> Leythos wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <gae9md$mbd$1@registered.motzarella.org>,
>>>> iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>>> Leythos wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article <gabfjn$9lq$1@registered.motzarella.org>,
>>>>>> iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well, if you need super high quality printing, perhaps Canon is
>>>>>>> better I don't know. I just did some posters with HP on
>>>>>>> photographic paper and it looked as professional as when you take
>>>>>>> it to a printer and I don't have a high end HP by any means.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> But that's where your lack of stated experience shows.
>>>>>
>>>>> It looks like it was made at a print shop :p
>>>>
>>>> Again, to your eye, which we've seen, from your comments, has
>>>> limited experience in the computer world.
>>>>
>>>>>> HP makes AVERAGE color printers, nothing super good, and other
>>>>>> vendors do.
>>>>>
>>>>> So what?
>>>>
>>>> So, you said that users would be happy as long as they stayed away
>>>> from some major players in the market, and Cannon has always had
>>>> better color quality than HP. You lack of experience shows that you
>>>> don't really know enough to make general statements about Vista or
>>>> Linux or XP even.
>>>>
>>>>>> You're also posting in a Vista group and you're not contributing
>>>>>> to VISTA, you're pushing Linux and you were even pushing it before
>>>>>> you had even installed Vista.
>>>>>
>>>>> Don't like it? Live with it and try to get over it. Suggesting
>>>>> Ubuntu to Vista users is doing them a big favor.
>>>>
>>>> Except that most people that run vista get it preinstalled with a
>>>> set of applications that they can use, others buy MS Office or MS
>>>> Works as an add-on, often pre-installed, printers and other hardware
>>>> doesn't require any effort to get installed unless it's OLD. Few
>>>> people that buy vista could change the OS to Ubuntu or other
>>>> versions of Linux with much success and then still be able to work
>>>> or do the same things they did before. You are not helping them by
>>>> pretending that it's easy.
>>>
>>> Yawn. You don't know what you're talking about.
>>
>>
>> Yes, I do, as I have been working with Unix and Windows for decades as
>> well as Linux and with PEOPLE.
>>
>
> I don't believe you.
>

What makes you think anyone believes anything you ever said in here.

> Alias
 
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:47:46 +0000 (UTC), DanS
<t.h.i.s.n.t.h.a.t@a.d.e.l.p.h.i.a.n.e.t> wrote:

>> Your printing and scanning problems are no doubt due to not using
>> factory inks in your printers.
>
>I'd think it's driver oriented problems he speaks of.
>
>In the past, I've always purchased printers in which the cartridges where
>ink tanks, and nothing else, usually Epson. That way, you can replace the
>ink cartridges with low-cost replacement cartridges...meaning you can
>replace both color and black for $10-$11, instead of $70 or more. (I've
>never re-filled any.)
>
>If the replacment's were that expensive, it'd almost be worth it to just
>buy a whole new printer when the ink runs out.

Sorry... my post's humor probably slipped by most people. Measkite
hangs around in usenet printer groups where he attributes every
printing problem to the poster not using factory replacement ink and
cartridges. He's a major PITA troll.
 
+Bob+ <uctraing@ultranet.com> wrote in
news:pnqlc418rakq8f0slvvn073fgl6tiltp9e@4ax.com:

> On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:47:46 +0000 (UTC), DanS
> <t.h.i.s.n.t.h.a.t@a.d.e.l.p.h.i.a.n.e.t> wrote:
>
>>> Your printing and scanning problems are no doubt due to not using
>>> factory inks in your printers.
>>
>>I'd think it's driver oriented problems he speaks of.
>>
>>In the past, I've always purchased printers in which the cartridges
>>where ink tanks, and nothing else, usually Epson. That way, you can
>>replace the ink cartridges with low-cost replacement
>>cartridges...meaning you can replace both color and black for $10-$11,
>>instead of $70 or more. (I've never re-filled any.)
>>
>>If the replacment's were that expensive, it'd almost be worth it to
>>just buy a whole new printer when the ink runs out.
>
> Sorry... my post's humor probably slipped by most people. Measkite
> hangs around in usenet printer groups where he attributes every
> printing problem to the poster not using factory replacement ink and
> cartridges. He's a major PITA troll.

(I didn't know if it was related to that or not, but I was only aware of
it by Franks postings.....again....and again.....and again....etc..)

I do know that some refuse to buy anything else that OEM inks though.
 
In article <6ivpvbFotc2U3@mid.individual.net>, ray@zianet.com says...
> On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 13:33:20 -0400, Leythos wrote:
>
> > In article <gabdc3$qb1$1@registered.motzarella.org>,
> > iamalias@REMOVEgmail.com says...
> >> I have an HP AllinONE and the printer took three clicks to install and
> >> the scanner was ready to scan with XSane once it found the scanner.
> >> Avoid Canon, Brother and Lexmark and you're good to go with Ubuntu.
> >>
> >>
> > That's a LARGE part of the market to avoid just to use a FREE operating
> > system.
>
> Please see comment above. Canon support sucks because Canon will not
> support Linux at all. I've had no problems with other printers/scanners
> and I understand that there are now Linux drivers for many Canon printers
> - in spite of Canon.

Point exactly. Suggesting that people use Ubuntu and not ignore a large
part of the market for printers is just stupid in a vista group.

--
- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)
 
Back
Top