D
Daave
caver1 wrote:
> Daave wrote:
>> The poster formerly known as 'The Poster Formerly Known as Nina
>> DiBoy' wrote:
>>> Daave wrote:
>>>> HeyBub wrote:
>>>>> There is no "fair use" copying of music CDs, software
>>>>> distributions, or other things we talk about here.
>>>> Although there may be no fair use exemption for software
>>>> distributions,
>>> But there is for software distributions:
>>> http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/117.html
>>
>> Yes, I know. When I said "may," I was acknowledging that there "is."
>>
>> I guess I should have just said "is."
>>
>> (Then again that would all depend on what the definition of "is"
>> is...)
>>
>>
>
> This is in Title 17 chapter 10 subchapter d of the
> Copyright Law of the United States of America
> and Related Laws Contained in Title 17 of the
> United States Code
>
> § 1008. Prohibition on certain infringement actions
>
> No action may be brought under this title alleging
> infringement of copyright based on the
> manufacture, importation, or distribution of a
> digital audio recording device, a digital audio
> recording medium, an analog recording device, or
> an analog recording medium, or based on the
> noncommercial use by a consumer of such a device
> or medium for making digital musical recordings or
> analog musical recordings.
>
> If you cannot have action brought against you
> under this code for non commercial use for making
> those recordings Then yes there is fair use coping
> of cds.
> caver1
Yes, the fair use exemption for the copying of *music* CDs has been
established. My original quote:
Although there may be no fair use exemption for software distributions,
there is one for the copying of music CDs (for personal, noncommercial
use). See Audio Home Recording Act of 1992, 17 U.S.C. § 1008.
Also see "RECORDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA v. DIAMOND
MULTIMEDIA SYS., 180 F.3d 1072 (9th Cir. 1999)":
http://www.law.cornell.edu/copyright/cases/180_F3d_1072.htm
> Daave wrote:
>> The poster formerly known as 'The Poster Formerly Known as Nina
>> DiBoy' wrote:
>>> Daave wrote:
>>>> HeyBub wrote:
>>>>> There is no "fair use" copying of music CDs, software
>>>>> distributions, or other things we talk about here.
>>>> Although there may be no fair use exemption for software
>>>> distributions,
>>> But there is for software distributions:
>>> http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/117.html
>>
>> Yes, I know. When I said "may," I was acknowledging that there "is."
>>
>> I guess I should have just said "is."
>>
>> (Then again that would all depend on what the definition of "is"
>> is...)
>>
>>
>
> This is in Title 17 chapter 10 subchapter d of the
> Copyright Law of the United States of America
> and Related Laws Contained in Title 17 of the
> United States Code
>
> § 1008. Prohibition on certain infringement actions
>
> No action may be brought under this title alleging
> infringement of copyright based on the
> manufacture, importation, or distribution of a
> digital audio recording device, a digital audio
> recording medium, an analog recording device, or
> an analog recording medium, or based on the
> noncommercial use by a consumer of such a device
> or medium for making digital musical recordings or
> analog musical recordings.
>
> If you cannot have action brought against you
> under this code for non commercial use for making
> those recordings Then yes there is fair use coping
> of cds.
> caver1
Yes, the fair use exemption for the copying of *music* CDs has been
established. My original quote:
Although there may be no fair use exemption for software distributions,
there is one for the copying of music CDs (for personal, noncommercial
use). See Audio Home Recording Act of 1992, 17 U.S.C. § 1008.
Also see "RECORDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA v. DIAMOND
MULTIMEDIA SYS., 180 F.3d 1072 (9th Cir. 1999)":
http://www.law.cornell.edu/copyright/cases/180_F3d_1072.htm