Frank wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>> Frank wrote:
>>
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>
>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> With Windows running any Office program besides 07, one cannot --
>>>>>> without downloading an update -- read .docx files. With the new
>>>>>> Ubuntu and Open Office, you can and no downloads or updates required.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hey sh*t-for-=brains...guess what...open orifice can't properly
>>>>> open slightly complex word documents be they either in .doc, .rtf,
>>>>> or .docx file format.
>>>>> We've got a rather complex 47 page business brochure the we use as
>>>>> a test mule. Years ago, we created it for client in .doc format
>>>>> using Microsoft Office 97 and graphics created using Corel Draw 7.
>>>>> It contains a variety of fonts, graphics, charts, tables and
>>>>> macros. It has both portrait and landscape pages.
>>>>> It does not have any animations or fly-ins.
>>>>> We have tested it in all versions of open orifice and it always
>>>>> makes a mess of the document. We also test it in all versions of
>>>>> WordPerfect...again no go.
>>>>> It has always opened perfectly in Microsoft Office 97, 2000, XP,
>>>>> 2003 and now in 2007.
>>>>> If you're in business, you'd know that the world runs on Microsoft
>>>>> Windows and Microsoft Office.
>>>>> Frank
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Send me the document and I'll tell you if I can open it or not.
>>>
>>>
>>> No, I won't send you the document. It is an existing clients document
>>> and we are under NDA with them. I have told you it won't open
>>> correctly in anything except Microsoft Word and I really don't care
>>> if you believe it or not. You're a known and admitted liar, a thief a
>>> troll, a spammer and a bigoted atheist.
>>> If you're really interested in knowing the limits of oo, and I don't
>>> think you really are, you'll find examples of people complaining that
>>> oo won't properly open Office files all over the web. Try google.
>>
>>
>> You have only written one whole document with Office 07? LOL! Figures.
>
> You're extremely stupid aren't you? I never said anything at all like
> that sheep-fukker. I said it's a test mule that we use. Of course I
> didn't expect an as*hole loser like to understand.
> Figures.
>>
>>>
>>> I will
>>>
>>>> even post a screen shot to prove it. Open Office has improved since
>>>> you
>>>> last tested it.
>>>
>>>
>>> They improved it today? I don't thinks so.
>>
>>
>> "thinks"?
>>
>>>>
>>>> Alias, expecting Frank the Wank to hurl another unfounded insult
>>>> because he doesn't have the *balls* to send me the document by email.
>>>
>>>
>>> Sorry sh*t-for-brains, but I won't violate our NDA with our client to
>>> simple prove you are wrong. Try google. You'll find millions of
>>> examples that you can test. Oh, be sure and post the screen shots of
>>> your being wrong ok, sheep-fukker...LOL!
>>> Frank
>>
>>
>> So write up another document and send it to me. Be sure it has all the
>> bells and whistles that you think won't work when I open it and can be
>> seen with a screen shot. Can you do it or are you just making it up as
>> you go along again?
>
> Sorry sheep-fukker, but I don't work for you nor do I need to prove that
> you're a liar.
> You can do all of that yourself...LOL!
> Frank
HAHAHAHAHA! I knew you wouldn't do it. No balls, only bluster. HAHAHAHAHA!
Alias