Why one should choose Linux over Vista

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alias
  • Start date Start date
Ringmaster wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:47:08 -0400, Kicking Albright
> <Albright@Kicking.com> wrote:
>
>> Ringmaster wrote:
>>> On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:10:28 -0400, Kicking Albright
>>> <Albright@Kicking.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ringmaster wrote:
>>>>> No wonder you constantly get laughed at and end up in most people's
>>>>> kill files.
>>>> And you're not there in people's kill files no matter what name you post
>>>> under? You killed *Adam Albright* to the point that you cannot even post
>>>> under the name anymore.
>>> You're retarded if you actually think that.
>> Then be the tough old man you try to act like and use Adam Albright, be
>> a man Albright be the tough old man that you claim to be.
>
> You're trying to tell me what name I can post under now? I used Adam
> Albright when I posted through Usenetserver. Since I don't use that
> news server anymore I changed the name I post under. Big deal. Funny
> it gets some no brains idiot like you shorts all bunched up. Deal with
> it fool.

My hubby Ringmaster uses many different aliases. He's going to get
in big trouble with the IRS someday!
 
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:13:17 -0700, "uwe" <forspammers@no.ne> wrote:

>> If you as a developer aren't interested in the huge audience that would
>> dump Windows in a heart beat if something better came along, sooner or
>> later somebody else will take the gamble.
>
>Read my post again. When Borland came out with Kylix, the whole Delphi
>community was excited that it was now possible to write applications for
>Linux from within their own IDE. The reaction on the "other side of the
>table": a big uproar in the Linux world that a profit-orientated company
>would dare to attempt to earn money in their "free" little habitat. Instead
>of cheering that their OS was now supported by a big compiler manufacturer,
>they chose to whine and whinge that their open source model was at risk to
>be taken over by profiteers. Are those the dreamers and visionaries you were
>talking about?
>
>Uwe

Obviously, you have no idea what dreamers and visionaries are or their
importance in society. This is the group that moves civilization
forward. Any old fool can be a follower and play it safe.
 
uwe wrote:
> I'm a software developer writing XP/Vista applications for the
> consumer market. If I put a year's worth of work into an application,
> I have a potential market of about 90% of desktops worldwide at best.

That is correct. However you are also competing with 900 times as many
other developers that are doing the same thing.
> Now, if I would waste my time to write desktop (!) applications for
> LINUX, how many potential customers worldwide, who are actually
> willing to pay for my work, would I have? Exactly... -) And BTW:
> I've seen those hardcore LINUX fans howling when Borland released
> Kylix a few years ago complaining that a commercial product should
> not attempt to break into the LINUX world. Big chance missed, folks.
>
> Uwe
 
fb wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>
>> Mrs. Ringmaster wrote:
>>
>>> ***SPAM***
>>
>>
>> False. It's completely on topic as per MS guidelines.
>
> Read the sign loser..."Vista general". No mention of linux.
>>
>>>
>>> MESSAGE MARKED FOR CANCELLATION
>>>
>>> REF: TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl
>>> microsoft.public.windows.vista.general:1084639
>>>
>>> From: Alias <aka@mascaradoyanónimo.jo>
>>> Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.vista.general
>>
>>
>> Too late, chum, it's already on the MS servers and throughout the
>> world. Live with it and try to get over it.
>
> You really are a small, weak little man and an arrogant POS aren't you.
You certainly claim Da Jerk title.
> Not hard to see why you've been married 4 times.
> Loser!
>
 
fb wrote:
> %Alias# wrote:
>
>> It's not spam but a post that's completely within MS guidelines.
> -----------------------------------------------
> Who exactly do you think you're fooling?
> Your post was not within MS Vista general guidelines. You know it and
> everyone in here knows it.
False
> You're sick in the head.
You certainly are
> No wonder you've been married 4 times.
To your wife
> You are a loser!
You certainly are
 
Ringmaster wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:13:17 -0700, "uwe" <forspammers@no.ne> wrote:
>
>>> If you as a developer aren't interested in the huge audience that would
>>> dump Windows in a heart beat if something better came along, sooner or
>>> later somebody else will take the gamble.
>> Read my post again. When Borland came out with Kylix, the whole Delphi
>> community was excited that it was now possible to write applications for
>> Linux from within their own IDE. The reaction on the "other side of the
>> table": a big uproar in the Linux world that a profit-orientated company
>> would dare to attempt to earn money in their "free" little habitat. Instead
>> of cheering that their OS was now supported by a big compiler manufacturer,
>> they chose to whine and whinge that their open source model was at risk to
>> be taken over by profiteers. Are those the dreamers and visionaries you were
>> talking about?
>>
>> Uwe
>
> Obviously, you have no idea what dreamers and visionaries are or their
> importance in society. This is the group that moves civilization
> forward. Any old fool can be a follower and play it safe.

That's my hubby Ringmaster alright, an "old fool"! LOL!
 
> Any idiot can "program" with a graphical interface when you point, click,
> drag and move the mouse around and pick things off a menu.

Sorry, but that's nonsense. What you describe is putting together the GUI of
a form. Implementing the functionality behind it is the real work, and it
requires the same programming skills you'd need when developing in assembly
or any other language.

Uwe
 
"Ringmaster" <bigtop@VistaGeneralCircus.net> wrote in message
news:biqu84tidc8t64i7r1qp63l13sbrebpadq@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:19:17 -0400, Kicking Albright
> <Albright@Kicking.com> wrote:
>
>>Ringmaster wrote:
>>> On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:27:51 -0700, "uwe" <forspammers@no.ne> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm a software developer writing XP/Vista applications for the consumer
>>>> market. If I put a year's worth of work into an application, I have a
>>>> potential market of about 90% of desktops worldwide at best. Now, if I
>>>> would
>>>> waste my time to write desktop (!) applications for LINUX, how many
>>>> potential customers worldwide, who are actually willing to pay for my
>>>> work,
>>>> would I have? Exactly... -) And BTW: I've seen those hardcore LINUX
>>>> fans
>>>> howling when Borland released Kylix a few years ago complaining that a
>>>> commercial product should not attempt to break into the LINUX world.
>>>> Big
>>>> chance missed, folks.
>>>>
>>
>>Look uwe, I am software developer too on the MS platform.
>
> You and over a million others. Big deal. So what. I don't even
> consider jerks like you programmers. When I was doing some custom
> programming for business applications for my employers over 20 years
> ago I used mostly Assembly... far over your head little boy.
>

Of course you don't. Your way is the only way, right?


> Any idiot can "program" with a graphical interface when you point,
> click, drag and move the mouse around and pick things off a menu. No
> brains required. On the other hand programming is assembly language at
> the machine level requires you know how to think logically. Far beyond
> your puny abilities obviously as you keep proving.
>
>

You have no idea what you're talking about. Take a look at the jobs out
there and the salaries offered. If what you say were true, then programmers
would make $10 an hour. They don't.

Programming in assembly language means you are stuck in the 60's. Better
take a class.
 
"uwe" <forspammers@no.ne> wrote in message
news:eIExEFb8IHA.2060@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> Any idiot can "program" with a graphical interface when you point, click,
>> drag and move the mouse around and pick things off a menu.
>
> Sorry, but that's nonsense. What you describe is putting together the GUI
> of a form. Implementing the functionality behind it is the real work, and
> it requires the same programming skills you'd need when developing in
> assembly or any other language.
>
> Uwe

Adam's thinking is stuck in the 60's. He has no clue about the technology
around today.
 
uwe wrote:
>> Any idiot can "program" with a graphical interface when you point,
>> click, drag and move the mouse around and pick things off a menu.
>
> Sorry, but that's nonsense. What you describe is putting together the
> GUI of a form. Implementing the functionality behind it is the real
> work, and it requires the same programming skills you'd need when
> developing in assembly or any other language.
>
> Uwe

Uwe is right and Ringmaster is incorrect! The X goes to Uwe!
 
Bill Yanaire wrote:

> You have no idea what you're talking about. Take a look at the jobs out
> there and the salaries offered. If what you say were true, then programmers
> would make $10 an hour. They don't.
>
> Programming in assembly language means you are stuck in the 60's. Better
> take a class.

My hubby Ringmaster found out that Wal-Mart will be opening "Computer
Doctor" centers inside their stores. He's got an interview with them
next week! He is so excited that he has to change his Depends a lot
more often!
 
> Obviously, you have no idea what dreamers and visionaries are or their
> importance in society.

What do "dreams and visions" have to do with Linux? Neither the technology,
nor the concept of free, open-sourced software is new or revolutionary.

Uwe
 

> However you are also competing with 900 times as many other developers
> that are doing the same thing.

Sure do. That's called competition and it is the driving force behind
progress.

Uwe
 
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:32:23 -0700, "Bill Yanaire" <bill@yanaire.com>
wrote:

>
>"uwe" <forspammers@no.ne> wrote in message
>news:eIExEFb8IHA.2060@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>> Any idiot can "program" with a graphical interface when you point, click,
>>> drag and move the mouse around and pick things off a menu.
>>
>> Sorry, but that's nonsense. What you describe is putting together the GUI
>> of a form. Implementing the functionality behind it is the real work, and
>> it requires the same programming skills you'd need when developing in
>> assembly or any other language.
>>
>> Uwe
>
>Adam's thinking is stuck in the 60's. He has no clue about the technology
>around today.

Geez... Assembly is still used. But oh, excuse me, you got to be smart
to program in it. Anybody can learn how to "program" with some GUI
screen to stare at. Sony's software engineers make extensive use of
Assembly language in all critical areas of their flagship product
Vegas, by far the best and most powerful professional grade video
editor on the Windows Platform. The one primary reason I've stuck with
Windows, I'm not giving up my Vegas. ) It is fast, powerful and
intutative... all due to Assembly calls.
 
Ringmaster wrote:

> ...You and over a million others. Big deal. So what. I don't even
> consider jerks like you programmers.

WoW! You have such a nice way with words! What do you think most people
consider you?

When I was doing some custom
> programming for business applications for my employers over 20 years
> ago I used mostly Assembly... far over your head little boy.

Hehehe...that's funny! Even pathetic that you are so insecure that you
need to tell lies like that given we all know you're far too incompetent
to even get one little install of Vista Business to run properly.
Who do you think you're fooling?
>
> Any idiot can "program" with a graphical interface when you point,
> click, drag and move the mouse around and pick things off a menu. No
> brains required.

Well, that clearly eliminates you!

On the other hand programming is assembly language at
> the machine level requires you know how to think logically.

Again, leaves you out of that picture.

Far beyond
> your puny abilities obviously as you keep proving.

We all do see the great talent you have...shoving your bald head up your
fat ass and making a fool out of yourself.
Congratulations!
 
Re: alias can't afford Vista so he spams this ng...Loser!

On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:59:14 -0500, "Mrs. Ringmaster"
<mrsringmaster@yahoo.com> wrote:

>Ringmaster wrote:
>> On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:05:01 -0700, fb <fab@nospamm.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>
>>>> fb wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> %Alias# wrote:
>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> What an arrogrant POS lying linux troll you are. The sign says "Vista
>>>>> general" with no mention of linux and that really fries up your stupid
>>>>> lying linux ass doesn't it.
>>>>> The post was completely off topic and not within MS guidelines.
>>>>> Get lost troll.
>>>>
>>>> Do you just *have* to remind us how impaired your sense of logic and
>>>> reading comprehension skills are?
>>> You are obviously and uneducated weak little POS for a human being.
>>> You have a warped sense of logic and an impaired reading comprehension.
>>
>> Actually the uneducated one is you as your own sloppy spelling and
>> grammar keep proving.
>>
>> For example Frank grammar ===> "You are obviously and uneducated..."
>
>It's not nice to point your finger at others. Remember, your other
>four fingers are point right back at you.

Tell it to Frank. That jerk is constantly shaking his finger at
everybody while he has another temper tantrum. Need proof, just look
up several lines for typical Frank bluster. The guy is a jerk. Anyone
that support this loser is also a jerk.
 
Ringmaster wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:19:17 -0400, Kicking Albright
> <Albright@Kicking.com> wrote:
>
>> Ringmaster wrote:
>>> On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:27:51 -0700, "uwe" <forspammers@no.ne> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm a software developer writing XP/Vista applications for the consumer
>>>> market. If I put a year's worth of work into an application, I have a
>>>> potential market of about 90% of desktops worldwide at best. Now, if I would
>>>> waste my time to write desktop (!) applications for LINUX, how many
>>>> potential customers worldwide, who are actually willing to pay for my work,
>>>> would I have? Exactly... -) And BTW: I've seen those hardcore LINUX fans
>>>> howling when Borland released Kylix a few years ago complaining that a
>>>> commercial product should not attempt to break into the LINUX world. Big
>>>> chance missed, folks.
>>>>
>> Look uwe, I am software developer too on the MS platform.
>
> You and over a million others. Big deal. So what. I don't even
> consider jerks like you programmers. When I was doing some custom
> programming for business applications for my employers over 20 years
> ago I used mostly Assembly... far over your head little boy.

For your employers over 20 years ago big deal. In the meantime, I was
writing IBM 360/370 Assembler language solutions and writing solutions
in DEC PDP 8/11 assembler language commercially for the DEC systems and
for the employers I worked for too, in that time period.

You're acting like you're the only one that has done anything, and no
one but you has gone down any path.

>
> Any idiot can "program" with a graphical interface when you point,
> click, drag and move the mouse around and pick things off a menu. No
> brains required.

You don't know what you're talking about Albright, because one can
certainly go to the Windows API with a COM or .NET solution and deal
with UI controls, creating controls on the fly in code with no drag and
drop of the controls on a form.

One can create a form in .Net on the fly, create controls on the form
any of the controls whether it be a Web form with Web controls or
Windows form with Windows controls, set all the controls properties and
do it on the fly in code, as everything in .Net coding is an *object*,
and one can create objects, manipulate objects and the object's methods
and properties in code on the fly.

One doesn't have to drag and drop, but there is nothing wrong with it
Albright.

> On the other hand programming is assembly language at
> the machine level requires you know how to think logically. Far beyond
> your puny abilities obviously as you keep proving.
>

Man, I have done all of that and more, and most likely I have for gotten
more about Information Technology than you'll ever know in your 60 some
plus years of being on this Earth. You tell me something that I don't
know Albright about IT.

Your problem is you Albright. You're a wannabe god and a Superman and
you expect that someone is going to been knee to you, and that's not
going to happen, because your problem is that you put your pants on like
everyone else -- one leg at a time, you are mortal, and you are nobody.
 
measekite wrote:

>
> That is correct. However you are also competing with 900 times as many
> other developers that are doing the same thing.

Well a brainless idiot moron like you isn't one of them!
>
 
"Ringmaster" <bigtop@VistaGeneralCircus.net> wrote in message
news:cbuu845fud25p75991uqlv4dhiajemaqkf@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:32:23 -0700, "Bill Yanaire" <bill@yanaire.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"uwe" <forspammers@no.ne> wrote in message
>>news:eIExEFb8IHA.2060@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>> Any idiot can "program" with a graphical interface when you point,
>>>> click,
>>>> drag and move the mouse around and pick things off a menu.
>>>
>>> Sorry, but that's nonsense. What you describe is putting together the
>>> GUI
>>> of a form. Implementing the functionality behind it is the real work,
>>> and
>>> it requires the same programming skills you'd need when developing in
>>> assembly or any other language.
>>>
>>> Uwe
>>
>>Adam's thinking is stuck in the 60's. He has no clue about the technology
>>around today.
>
> Geez... Assembly is still used. But oh, excuse me, you got to be smart
> to program in it. Anybody can learn how to "program" with some GUI
> screen to stare at. Sony's software engineers make extensive use of
> Assembly language in all critical areas of their flagship product
> Vegas, by far the best and most powerful professional grade video
> editor on the Windows Platform. The one primary reason I've stuck with
> Windows, I'm not giving up my Vegas. ) It is fast, powerful and
> intutative... all due to Assembly calls.

Not to sure about that. I think most software uses some version of C or C++
at that level. What makes you think Sony uses Assembler?
 
Ringmaster wrote:
>
> You're trying to tell me what name I can post under now? I used Adam
> Albright when I posted through Usenetserver. Since I don't use that
> news server anymore I changed the name I post under. Big deal. Funny
> it gets some no brains idiot like you shorts all bunched up. Deal with
> it fool.

You're suppose to be a grown man Albright past 60 something. No one can
tell you what to do. You're past your ability to listen to anyone or
learn, Albright, because you know it all according to you.
 
Back
Top