G
Gernot Frisch
> well golly gee, wouldn't posting such obvious flame bait make you a troll
> then?
Must have had a bad day, yesterday. Apologies.
-Gernot
> well golly gee, wouldn't posting such obvious flame bait make you a troll
> then?
Must have had a bad day, yesterday. Apologies.
-Gernot
K
kurttrail
Frank wrote:
> john wrote:
>
>> "Frank" <fab@notspam.com> wrote in message
>> news:e9tt6dgqIHA.4848@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>
>>>ray wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:47:54 +0200, Gernot Frisch wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Folks, this is a "Vista" NG.
>>>>>Thus, the main audience is "Vista" users. People who already spent a
>>>>>lot of money for an operating system, which they do want to use now.
>>>>>Ubuntu has a clear right of existence in it's area, but not in this
>>>>>group. If you like it better, fine. But don't try to spread your
>>>>>"religion" here when someone asks for help about a Vista problem.
>>>>>
>>>>>In short:
>>>>>This newsgroup = Vista
>>>>>alt.os.linux.ubuntu = Ubuntu
>>>>>
>>>>>KTHXBYE.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Wish you'd relay that info to frankie and some of the other wintrolls
>>>>frequenting alt.os.linux.ubuntu.
>>>
>>>No, you need to hammer that fact into nostop, aka onthepot, aka
>>>thepotson, aka doris.
>>>I told that POS lying linux troll that if didn't stop trolling here I'd
>>>pay a visit to that sh*thole open sores dump ng he calls home. He
>>>didn't and I did...LOL!
>>>Frank
>>>
>>>
>>
>> yea, and I'm betting you got your ass handed to you, much like what
>> happens here
>>
>>
> That is bet you've already lost john-boy. Frank
He won it in my case with you, Frank.
--
Peace!
Kurt
Former Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"
> john wrote:
>
>> "Frank" <fab@notspam.com> wrote in message
>> news:e9tt6dgqIHA.4848@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>
>>>ray wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:47:54 +0200, Gernot Frisch wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Folks, this is a "Vista" NG.
>>>>>Thus, the main audience is "Vista" users. People who already spent a
>>>>>lot of money for an operating system, which they do want to use now.
>>>>>Ubuntu has a clear right of existence in it's area, but not in this
>>>>>group. If you like it better, fine. But don't try to spread your
>>>>>"religion" here when someone asks for help about a Vista problem.
>>>>>
>>>>>In short:
>>>>>This newsgroup = Vista
>>>>>alt.os.linux.ubuntu = Ubuntu
>>>>>
>>>>>KTHXBYE.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Wish you'd relay that info to frankie and some of the other wintrolls
>>>>frequenting alt.os.linux.ubuntu.
>>>
>>>No, you need to hammer that fact into nostop, aka onthepot, aka
>>>thepotson, aka doris.
>>>I told that POS lying linux troll that if didn't stop trolling here I'd
>>>pay a visit to that sh*thole open sores dump ng he calls home. He
>>>didn't and I did...LOL!
>>>Frank
>>>
>>>
>>
>> yea, and I'm betting you got your ass handed to you, much like what
>> happens here
>>
>>
> That is bet you've already lost john-boy. Frank
He won it in my case with you, Frank.
--
Peace!
Kurt
Former Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"
L
Lang Murphy
Gernot Frisch wrote:
>
> Folks, this is a "Vista" NG.
> Thus, the main audience is "Vista" users. People who already spent a lot
> of money for an operating system, which they do want to use now.
> Ubuntu has a clear right of existence in it's area, but not in this group.
> If you like it better, fine. But don't try to spread your "religion"
> here when someone asks for help about a Vista problem.
>
> In short:
> This newsgroup = Vista
> alt.os.linux.ubuntu = Ubuntu
>
> KTHXBYE.
Amen, brother.
Unfortunately, you're going to get replies from Ubuntu fan-bois that
claim that because this NG is titled vista.general, anyone can post
whatever they want here. That rationalization has been going on for
quite some time. Those people don't seem to comprehend the "vista" part
of the title. That the "general" part of the title is intended to
address general Vista OS questions not covered by other vista ng's is
completely ignored by those who rationalize their Ubuntu jihad in this NG.
Like yourself, I have no issue with Ubuntu. I've tried numerous Ubuntu
releases. I prefer Vista. But I don't go hang in the sole Ubunutu NG and
rail on about how folks should be using Vista instead of Ubuntu. I've
got better things to do with my time. Like attempt to answer questions,
not cast condescending aspersions and/or indulge in self-aggrandizement.
Lang
>
> Folks, this is a "Vista" NG.
> Thus, the main audience is "Vista" users. People who already spent a lot
> of money for an operating system, which they do want to use now.
> Ubuntu has a clear right of existence in it's area, but not in this group.
> If you like it better, fine. But don't try to spread your "religion"
> here when someone asks for help about a Vista problem.
>
> In short:
> This newsgroup = Vista
> alt.os.linux.ubuntu = Ubuntu
>
> KTHXBYE.
Amen, brother.
Unfortunately, you're going to get replies from Ubuntu fan-bois that
claim that because this NG is titled vista.general, anyone can post
whatever they want here. That rationalization has been going on for
quite some time. Those people don't seem to comprehend the "vista" part
of the title. That the "general" part of the title is intended to
address general Vista OS questions not covered by other vista ng's is
completely ignored by those who rationalize their Ubuntu jihad in this NG.
Like yourself, I have no issue with Ubuntu. I've tried numerous Ubuntu
releases. I prefer Vista. But I don't go hang in the sole Ubunutu NG and
rail on about how folks should be using Vista instead of Ubuntu. I've
got better things to do with my time. Like attempt to answer questions,
not cast condescending aspersions and/or indulge in self-aggrandizement.
Lang
V
vishhiita prime
I fixed it for you>>
Folks, this is a "Vista" NG.
Thus, the main audience is tormented and frustrated "Vista" users. People
who already spent a lot of
money for an operating system, see they were conned and, which they trying
desperatly to use now.
Ubuntu has a clear right of existence in it's area and in this group.
If you like it better, you are. And don't try to spread your Vista
"religion" here
when someone asks for help about a Vista problem.
In short:
This newsgroup => Vista= crap
alt.os.linux.ubuntu => get further information other than the info you will
be learning in vista.general
"Gernot Frisch" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:67o5haF2ppg2hU1@mid.individual.net...
>
> Folks, this is a "Vista" NG.
> Thus, the main audience is "Vista" users. People who already spent a lot
> of money for an operating system, which they do want to use now.
> Ubuntu has a clear right of existence in it's area, but not in this group.
> If you like it better, fine. But don't try to spread your "religion" here
> when someone asks for help about a Vista problem.
>
> In short:
> This newsgroup = Vista
> alt.os.linux.ubuntu = Ubuntu
>
> KTHXBYE.
Folks, this is a "Vista" NG.
Thus, the main audience is tormented and frustrated "Vista" users. People
who already spent a lot of
money for an operating system, see they were conned and, which they trying
desperatly to use now.
Ubuntu has a clear right of existence in it's area and in this group.
If you like it better, you are. And don't try to spread your Vista
"religion" here
when someone asks for help about a Vista problem.
In short:
This newsgroup => Vista= crap
alt.os.linux.ubuntu => get further information other than the info you will
be learning in vista.general
"Gernot Frisch" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:67o5haF2ppg2hU1@mid.individual.net...
>
> Folks, this is a "Vista" NG.
> Thus, the main audience is "Vista" users. People who already spent a lot
> of money for an operating system, which they do want to use now.
> Ubuntu has a clear right of existence in it's area, but not in this group.
> If you like it better, fine. But don't try to spread your "religion" here
> when someone asks for help about a Vista problem.
>
> In short:
> This newsgroup = Vista
> alt.os.linux.ubuntu = Ubuntu
>
> KTHXBYE.
A
Alias
Lang Murphy wrote:
> Gernot Frisch wrote:
>>
>> Folks, this is a "Vista" NG.
>> Thus, the main audience is "Vista" users. People who already spent a
>> lot of money for an operating system, which they do want to use now.
>> Ubuntu has a clear right of existence in it's area, but not in this
>> group.
>> If you like it better, fine. But don't try to spread your "religion"
>> here when someone asks for help about a Vista problem.
>>
>> In short:
>> This newsgroup = Vista
>> alt.os.linux.ubuntu = Ubuntu
>>
>> KTHXBYE.
>
> Amen, brother.
>
> Unfortunately, you're going to get replies from Ubuntu fan-bois that
> claim that because this NG is titled vista.general, anyone can post
> whatever they want here. That rationalization has been going on for
> quite some time. Those people don't seem to comprehend the "vista" part
> of the title. That the "general" part of the title is intended to
> address general Vista OS questions not covered by other vista ng's is
> completely ignored by those who rationalize their Ubuntu jihad in this NG.
>
> Like yourself, I have no issue with Ubuntu. I've tried numerous Ubuntu
> releases. I prefer Vista. But I don't go hang in the sole Ubunutu NG and
> rail on about how folks should be using Vista instead of Ubuntu. I've
> got better things to do with my time. Like attempt to answer questions,
> not cast condescending aspersions and/or indulge in self-aggrandizement.
>
> Lang
*Everyone* in the Ubuntu forums has heard of Vista so it would do you no
good to tell them about something they already know. Many in this
newsgroup have not heard of Ubuntu. Hence, my noble mission to free
people from the virus and malware trap and the DRM, WPA and WGA hassles
that is Vista.
Alias
> Gernot Frisch wrote:
>>
>> Folks, this is a "Vista" NG.
>> Thus, the main audience is "Vista" users. People who already spent a
>> lot of money for an operating system, which they do want to use now.
>> Ubuntu has a clear right of existence in it's area, but not in this
>> group.
>> If you like it better, fine. But don't try to spread your "religion"
>> here when someone asks for help about a Vista problem.
>>
>> In short:
>> This newsgroup = Vista
>> alt.os.linux.ubuntu = Ubuntu
>>
>> KTHXBYE.
>
> Amen, brother.
>
> Unfortunately, you're going to get replies from Ubuntu fan-bois that
> claim that because this NG is titled vista.general, anyone can post
> whatever they want here. That rationalization has been going on for
> quite some time. Those people don't seem to comprehend the "vista" part
> of the title. That the "general" part of the title is intended to
> address general Vista OS questions not covered by other vista ng's is
> completely ignored by those who rationalize their Ubuntu jihad in this NG.
>
> Like yourself, I have no issue with Ubuntu. I've tried numerous Ubuntu
> releases. I prefer Vista. But I don't go hang in the sole Ubunutu NG and
> rail on about how folks should be using Vista instead of Ubuntu. I've
> got better things to do with my time. Like attempt to answer questions,
> not cast condescending aspersions and/or indulge in self-aggrandizement.
>
> Lang
*Everyone* in the Ubuntu forums has heard of Vista so it would do you no
good to tell them about something they already know. Many in this
newsgroup have not heard of Ubuntu. Hence, my noble mission to free
people from the virus and malware trap and the DRM, WPA and WGA hassles
that is Vista.
Alias
L
Little Billy
"Frank" <fab@notspam.com> wrote in message
news:e9tt6dgqIHA.4848@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> ray wrote:
>> On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:47:54 +0200, Gernot Frisch wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Folks, this is a "Vista" NG.
>>>Thus, the main audience is "Vista" users. People who already spent a lot
>>>of money for an operating system, which they do want to use now. Ubuntu
>>>has a clear right of existence in it's area, but not in this group. If
>>>you like it better, fine. But don't try to spread your "religion" here
>>>when someone asks for help about a Vista problem.
It is like a religion to these paupers, they're like Jehovah Witnesses. If I
had something that great I'd keep it to myself
)
>>>
>>>In short:
>>>This newsgroup = Vista
>>>alt.os.linux.ubuntu = Ubuntu
>>>
>>>KTHXBYE.
>>
>>
>> Wish you'd relay that info to frankie and some of the other wintrolls
>> frequenting alt.os.linux.ubuntu.
>
> No, you need to hammer that fact into nostop, aka onthepot, aka thepotson,
> aka doris.
> I told that POS lying linux troll that if didn't stop trolling here I'd
> pay a visit to that sh*thole open sores dump ng he calls home.
> He didn't and I did...LOL!
> Frank
news:e9tt6dgqIHA.4848@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> ray wrote:
>> On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:47:54 +0200, Gernot Frisch wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Folks, this is a "Vista" NG.
>>>Thus, the main audience is "Vista" users. People who already spent a lot
>>>of money for an operating system, which they do want to use now. Ubuntu
>>>has a clear right of existence in it's area, but not in this group. If
>>>you like it better, fine. But don't try to spread your "religion" here
>>>when someone asks for help about a Vista problem.
It is like a religion to these paupers, they're like Jehovah Witnesses. If I
had something that great I'd keep it to myself
)>>>
>>>In short:
>>>This newsgroup = Vista
>>>alt.os.linux.ubuntu = Ubuntu
>>>
>>>KTHXBYE.
>>
>>
>> Wish you'd relay that info to frankie and some of the other wintrolls
>> frequenting alt.os.linux.ubuntu.
>
> No, you need to hammer that fact into nostop, aka onthepot, aka thepotson,
> aka doris.
> I told that POS lying linux troll that if didn't stop trolling here I'd
> pay a visit to that sh*thole open sores dump ng he calls home.
> He didn't and I did...LOL!
> Frank
L
Lang Murphy
kurttrail wrote:
> Lang Murphy wrote:
>
>> Gernot Frisch wrote:
>>> Folks, this is a "Vista" NG.
>>> Thus, the main audience is "Vista" users. People who already spent a
>>> lot of money for an operating system, which they do want to use now.
>>> Ubuntu has a clear right of existence in it's area, but not in this
>>> group. If you like it better, fine. But don't try to spread your
>>> "religion" here when someone asks for help about a Vista problem.
>>>
>>> In short:
>>> This newsgroup = Vista
>>> alt.os.linux.ubuntu = Ubuntu
>>>
>>> KTHXBYE.
>> Amen, brother.
>>
>> Unfortunately, you're going to get replies from Ubuntu fan-bois that
>> claim that because this NG is titled vista.general, anyone can post
>> whatever they want here. That rationalization has been going on for
>> quite some time. Those people don't seem to comprehend the "vista" part
>> of the title. That the "general" part of the title is intended to
>> address general Vista OS questions not covered by other vista ng's is
>> completely ignored by those who rationalize their Ubuntu jihad in this
>> NG.
>
> Dude, if MS wanted to limit this group to Vista-specific and make this a
> private group, MS could have done it. They did it for XP while it was in
> preview back in 2001.
>
> But obviously MS did not make the a private/specific group, so your
> problem is with MS, not with anybody else.
>
> Join up with the Frisch Brothers, and Frank. Petition MS to make your
> fantasy of a microsoft.private.windows.vista.specific a reality!
>
> Why b*tch about something, when you can do something?!
>
>> Like yourself, I have no issue with Ubuntu. I've tried numerous Ubuntu
>> releases. I prefer Vista. But I don't go hang in the sole Ubunutu NG and
>> rail on about how folks should be using Vista instead of Ubuntu. I've
>> got better things to do with my time. Like attempt to answer questions,
>> not cast condescending aspersions and/or indulge in self-aggrandizement.
>
> Like there is anyone in the Ubuntu group that hasn't heard of Vista?
>
> The same isn't true of Ubuntu. Hell, my own sister didn't even know what
> I meant by "Linux" just over a month ago.
>
> And let's not forget all the VistaFanboys that bring up Ubuntu more than
> I do. Try to stop your own brethren, before you start with those that
> ain't.
>
Dood, who cares about whether it's public or private? My point is that I
don't go into the Ubuntu group and rant about how I think Vista, or OS
X, is "better" than Ubuntu... why do that? Others obviously like
Ubuntu... for whatever reasons. Fine have at it and good luck!
I think it's totally disingenuous to post pro-Ubuntu screeds in this NG.
Lang
> Lang Murphy wrote:
>
>> Gernot Frisch wrote:
>>> Folks, this is a "Vista" NG.
>>> Thus, the main audience is "Vista" users. People who already spent a
>>> lot of money for an operating system, which they do want to use now.
>>> Ubuntu has a clear right of existence in it's area, but not in this
>>> group. If you like it better, fine. But don't try to spread your
>>> "religion" here when someone asks for help about a Vista problem.
>>>
>>> In short:
>>> This newsgroup = Vista
>>> alt.os.linux.ubuntu = Ubuntu
>>>
>>> KTHXBYE.
>> Amen, brother.
>>
>> Unfortunately, you're going to get replies from Ubuntu fan-bois that
>> claim that because this NG is titled vista.general, anyone can post
>> whatever they want here. That rationalization has been going on for
>> quite some time. Those people don't seem to comprehend the "vista" part
>> of the title. That the "general" part of the title is intended to
>> address general Vista OS questions not covered by other vista ng's is
>> completely ignored by those who rationalize their Ubuntu jihad in this
>> NG.
>
> Dude, if MS wanted to limit this group to Vista-specific and make this a
> private group, MS could have done it. They did it for XP while it was in
> preview back in 2001.
>
> But obviously MS did not make the a private/specific group, so your
> problem is with MS, not with anybody else.
>
> Join up with the Frisch Brothers, and Frank. Petition MS to make your
> fantasy of a microsoft.private.windows.vista.specific a reality!
>
> Why b*tch about something, when you can do something?!
>
>> Like yourself, I have no issue with Ubuntu. I've tried numerous Ubuntu
>> releases. I prefer Vista. But I don't go hang in the sole Ubunutu NG and
>> rail on about how folks should be using Vista instead of Ubuntu. I've
>> got better things to do with my time. Like attempt to answer questions,
>> not cast condescending aspersions and/or indulge in self-aggrandizement.
>
> Like there is anyone in the Ubuntu group that hasn't heard of Vista?
>
> The same isn't true of Ubuntu. Hell, my own sister didn't even know what
> I meant by "Linux" just over a month ago.
>
> And let's not forget all the VistaFanboys that bring up Ubuntu more than
> I do. Try to stop your own brethren, before you start with those that
> ain't.
>
Dood, who cares about whether it's public or private? My point is that I
don't go into the Ubuntu group and rant about how I think Vista, or OS
X, is "better" than Ubuntu... why do that? Others obviously like
Ubuntu... for whatever reasons. Fine have at it and good luck!
I think it's totally disingenuous to post pro-Ubuntu screeds in this NG.
Lang
K
kurttrail
Lang Murphy wrote:
> kurttrail wrote:
>> Lang Murphy wrote:
>>
>>> Gernot Frisch wrote:
>>>> Folks, this is a "Vista" NG.
>>>> Thus, the main audience is "Vista" users. People who already spent a
>>>> lot of money for an operating system, which they do want to use now.
>>>> Ubuntu has a clear right of existence in it's area, but not in this
>>>> group. If you like it better, fine. But don't try to spread your
>>>> "religion" here when someone asks for help about a Vista problem.
>>>>
>>>> In short:
>>>> This newsgroup = Vista
>>>> alt.os.linux.ubuntu = Ubuntu
>>>>
>>>> KTHXBYE.
>>> Amen, brother.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, you're going to get replies from Ubuntu fan-bois that
>>> claim that because this NG is titled vista.general, anyone can post
>>> whatever they want here. That rationalization has been going on for
>>> quite some time. Those people don't seem to comprehend the "vista"
>>> part of the title. That the "general" part of the title is intended to
>>> address general Vista OS questions not covered by other vista ng's is
>>> completely ignored by those who rationalize their Ubuntu jihad in this
>>> NG.
>>
>> Dude, if MS wanted to limit this group to Vista-specific and make this
>> a private group, MS could have done it. They did it for XP while it
>> was in preview back in 2001.
>>
>> But obviously MS did not make the a private/specific group, so your
>> problem is with MS, not with anybody else.
>>
>> Join up with the Frisch Brothers, and Frank. Petition MS to make your
>> fantasy of a microsoft.private.windows.vista.specific a reality!
>>
>> Why b*tch about something, when you can do something?!
>>
>>> Like yourself, I have no issue with Ubuntu. I've tried numerous Ubuntu
>>> releases. I prefer Vista. But I don't go hang in the sole Ubunutu NG
>>> and rail on about how folks should be using Vista instead of Ubuntu.
>>> I've got better things to do with my time. Like attempt to answer
>>> questions, not cast condescending aspersions and/or indulge in
>>> self-aggrandizement.
>>
>> Like there is anyone in the Ubuntu group that hasn't heard of Vista?
>>
>> The same isn't true of Ubuntu. Hell, my own sister didn't even know
>> what I meant by "Linux" just over a month ago.
>>
>> And let's not forget all the VistaFanboys that bring up Ubuntu more
>> than I do. Try to stop your own brethren, before you start with those
>> that ain't.
>>
>>
> Dood, who cares about whether it's public or private?
Not me. I'm not the one whining about Ubuntu posts.
> My point is that I
> don't go into the Ubuntu group and rant about how I think Vista,
No one is stopping you.
> or OS
> X, is "better" than Ubuntu... why do that?
When people are wanting to ditch Vista, or are so frustrated with it that
they don't know what else to do, why not offer alternatives?
But the funny part is that 99% of the posts vaguely about Ubuntu here
would go away, if ya'll just got Frank to see reason.
Good luck with that one!
> Others obviously like
> Ubuntu... for whatever reasons. Fine have at it and good luck!
And some people use both Vista & Ubuntu, yet you'd want to limit their
speech here.
Fine. Sieg Heil!
> I think it's totally disingenuous to post pro-Ubuntu screeds in this NG.
No what is disingenuous is that you only want to stop the PRO-Ubuntu
"screeds."
Why not try to stop the anti-Ubuntu guys first? Because you agree with
them.
Stop Frank first, then get back to me.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
--
Peace!
Kurt
Former Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"
> kurttrail wrote:
>> Lang Murphy wrote:
>>
>>> Gernot Frisch wrote:
>>>> Folks, this is a "Vista" NG.
>>>> Thus, the main audience is "Vista" users. People who already spent a
>>>> lot of money for an operating system, which they do want to use now.
>>>> Ubuntu has a clear right of existence in it's area, but not in this
>>>> group. If you like it better, fine. But don't try to spread your
>>>> "religion" here when someone asks for help about a Vista problem.
>>>>
>>>> In short:
>>>> This newsgroup = Vista
>>>> alt.os.linux.ubuntu = Ubuntu
>>>>
>>>> KTHXBYE.
>>> Amen, brother.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, you're going to get replies from Ubuntu fan-bois that
>>> claim that because this NG is titled vista.general, anyone can post
>>> whatever they want here. That rationalization has been going on for
>>> quite some time. Those people don't seem to comprehend the "vista"
>>> part of the title. That the "general" part of the title is intended to
>>> address general Vista OS questions not covered by other vista ng's is
>>> completely ignored by those who rationalize their Ubuntu jihad in this
>>> NG.
>>
>> Dude, if MS wanted to limit this group to Vista-specific and make this
>> a private group, MS could have done it. They did it for XP while it
>> was in preview back in 2001.
>>
>> But obviously MS did not make the a private/specific group, so your
>> problem is with MS, not with anybody else.
>>
>> Join up with the Frisch Brothers, and Frank. Petition MS to make your
>> fantasy of a microsoft.private.windows.vista.specific a reality!
>>
>> Why b*tch about something, when you can do something?!
>>
>>> Like yourself, I have no issue with Ubuntu. I've tried numerous Ubuntu
>>> releases. I prefer Vista. But I don't go hang in the sole Ubunutu NG
>>> and rail on about how folks should be using Vista instead of Ubuntu.
>>> I've got better things to do with my time. Like attempt to answer
>>> questions, not cast condescending aspersions and/or indulge in
>>> self-aggrandizement.
>>
>> Like there is anyone in the Ubuntu group that hasn't heard of Vista?
>>
>> The same isn't true of Ubuntu. Hell, my own sister didn't even know
>> what I meant by "Linux" just over a month ago.
>>
>> And let's not forget all the VistaFanboys that bring up Ubuntu more
>> than I do. Try to stop your own brethren, before you start with those
>> that ain't.
>>
>>
> Dood, who cares about whether it's public or private?
Not me. I'm not the one whining about Ubuntu posts.
> My point is that I
> don't go into the Ubuntu group and rant about how I think Vista,
No one is stopping you.
> or OS
> X, is "better" than Ubuntu... why do that?
When people are wanting to ditch Vista, or are so frustrated with it that
they don't know what else to do, why not offer alternatives?
But the funny part is that 99% of the posts vaguely about Ubuntu here
would go away, if ya'll just got Frank to see reason.
Good luck with that one!
> Others obviously like
> Ubuntu... for whatever reasons. Fine have at it and good luck!
And some people use both Vista & Ubuntu, yet you'd want to limit their
speech here.
Fine. Sieg Heil!
> I think it's totally disingenuous to post pro-Ubuntu screeds in this NG.
No what is disingenuous is that you only want to stop the PRO-Ubuntu
"screeds."
Why not try to stop the anti-Ubuntu guys first? Because you agree with
them.
Stop Frank first, then get back to me.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
--
Peace!
Kurt
Former Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"
A
Alias
kurttrail wrote:
> Lang Murphy wrote:
>
>> kurttrail wrote:
>>> Lang Murphy wrote:
>>>
>>>> Gernot Frisch wrote:
>>>>> Folks, this is a "Vista" NG.
>>>>> Thus, the main audience is "Vista" users. People who already spent a
>>>>> lot of money for an operating system, which they do want to use now.
>>>>> Ubuntu has a clear right of existence in it's area, but not in this
>>>>> group. If you like it better, fine. But don't try to spread your
>>>>> "religion" here when someone asks for help about a Vista problem.
>>>>>
>>>>> In short:
>>>>> This newsgroup = Vista
>>>>> alt.os.linux.ubuntu = Ubuntu
>>>>>
>>>>> KTHXBYE.
>>>> Amen, brother.
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately, you're going to get replies from Ubuntu fan-bois that
>>>> claim that because this NG is titled vista.general, anyone can post
>>>> whatever they want here. That rationalization has been going on for
>>>> quite some time. Those people don't seem to comprehend the "vista"
>>>> part of the title. That the "general" part of the title is intended to
>>>> address general Vista OS questions not covered by other vista ng's is
>>>> completely ignored by those who rationalize their Ubuntu jihad in this
>>>> NG.
>>> Dude, if MS wanted to limit this group to Vista-specific and make this
>>> a private group, MS could have done it. They did it for XP while it
>>> was in preview back in 2001.
>>>
>>> But obviously MS did not make the a private/specific group, so your
>>> problem is with MS, not with anybody else.
>>>
>>> Join up with the Frisch Brothers, and Frank. Petition MS to make your
>>> fantasy of a microsoft.private.windows.vista.specific a reality!
>>>
>>> Why b*tch about something, when you can do something?!
>>>
>>>> Like yourself, I have no issue with Ubuntu. I've tried numerous Ubuntu
>>>> releases. I prefer Vista. But I don't go hang in the sole Ubunutu NG
>>>> and rail on about how folks should be using Vista instead of Ubuntu.
>>>> I've got better things to do with my time. Like attempt to answer
>>>> questions, not cast condescending aspersions and/or indulge in
>>>> self-aggrandizement.
>>> Like there is anyone in the Ubuntu group that hasn't heard of Vista?
>>>
>>> The same isn't true of Ubuntu. Hell, my own sister didn't even know
>>> what I meant by "Linux" just over a month ago.
>>>
>>> And let's not forget all the VistaFanboys that bring up Ubuntu more
>>> than I do. Try to stop your own brethren, before you start with those
>>> that ain't.
>>>
>>>
>> Dood, who cares about whether it's public or private?
>
> Not me. I'm not the one whining about Ubuntu posts.
>
>> My point is that I
>> don't go into the Ubuntu group and rant about how I think Vista,
>
> No one is stopping you.
>
>> or OS
>> X, is "better" than Ubuntu... why do that?
>
> When people are wanting to ditch Vista, or are so frustrated with it that
> they don't know what else to do, why not offer alternatives?
>
> But the funny part is that 99% of the posts vaguely about Ubuntu here
> would go away, if ya'll just got Frank to see reason.
>
> Good luck with that one!
>
>> Others obviously like
>> Ubuntu... for whatever reasons. Fine have at it and good luck!
>
> And some people use both Vista & Ubuntu, yet you'd want to limit their
> speech here.
>
> Fine. Sieg Heil!
>
>> I think it's totally disingenuous to post pro-Ubuntu screeds in this NG.
>
> No what is disingenuous is that you only want to stop the PRO-Ubuntu
> "screeds."
>
> Why not try to stop the anti-Ubuntu guys first? Because you agree with
> them.
>
> Stop Frank first, then get back to me.
>
> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
>
Never happen because Frank is Lang's hero.
Alias
> Lang Murphy wrote:
>
>> kurttrail wrote:
>>> Lang Murphy wrote:
>>>
>>>> Gernot Frisch wrote:
>>>>> Folks, this is a "Vista" NG.
>>>>> Thus, the main audience is "Vista" users. People who already spent a
>>>>> lot of money for an operating system, which they do want to use now.
>>>>> Ubuntu has a clear right of existence in it's area, but not in this
>>>>> group. If you like it better, fine. But don't try to spread your
>>>>> "religion" here when someone asks for help about a Vista problem.
>>>>>
>>>>> In short:
>>>>> This newsgroup = Vista
>>>>> alt.os.linux.ubuntu = Ubuntu
>>>>>
>>>>> KTHXBYE.
>>>> Amen, brother.
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately, you're going to get replies from Ubuntu fan-bois that
>>>> claim that because this NG is titled vista.general, anyone can post
>>>> whatever they want here. That rationalization has been going on for
>>>> quite some time. Those people don't seem to comprehend the "vista"
>>>> part of the title. That the "general" part of the title is intended to
>>>> address general Vista OS questions not covered by other vista ng's is
>>>> completely ignored by those who rationalize their Ubuntu jihad in this
>>>> NG.
>>> Dude, if MS wanted to limit this group to Vista-specific and make this
>>> a private group, MS could have done it. They did it for XP while it
>>> was in preview back in 2001.
>>>
>>> But obviously MS did not make the a private/specific group, so your
>>> problem is with MS, not with anybody else.
>>>
>>> Join up with the Frisch Brothers, and Frank. Petition MS to make your
>>> fantasy of a microsoft.private.windows.vista.specific a reality!
>>>
>>> Why b*tch about something, when you can do something?!
>>>
>>>> Like yourself, I have no issue with Ubuntu. I've tried numerous Ubuntu
>>>> releases. I prefer Vista. But I don't go hang in the sole Ubunutu NG
>>>> and rail on about how folks should be using Vista instead of Ubuntu.
>>>> I've got better things to do with my time. Like attempt to answer
>>>> questions, not cast condescending aspersions and/or indulge in
>>>> self-aggrandizement.
>>> Like there is anyone in the Ubuntu group that hasn't heard of Vista?
>>>
>>> The same isn't true of Ubuntu. Hell, my own sister didn't even know
>>> what I meant by "Linux" just over a month ago.
>>>
>>> And let's not forget all the VistaFanboys that bring up Ubuntu more
>>> than I do. Try to stop your own brethren, before you start with those
>>> that ain't.
>>>
>>>
>> Dood, who cares about whether it's public or private?
>
> Not me. I'm not the one whining about Ubuntu posts.
>
>> My point is that I
>> don't go into the Ubuntu group and rant about how I think Vista,
>
> No one is stopping you.
>
>> or OS
>> X, is "better" than Ubuntu... why do that?
>
> When people are wanting to ditch Vista, or are so frustrated with it that
> they don't know what else to do, why not offer alternatives?
>
> But the funny part is that 99% of the posts vaguely about Ubuntu here
> would go away, if ya'll just got Frank to see reason.
>
> Good luck with that one!
>
>> Others obviously like
>> Ubuntu... for whatever reasons. Fine have at it and good luck!
>
> And some people use both Vista & Ubuntu, yet you'd want to limit their
> speech here.
>
> Fine. Sieg Heil!
>
>> I think it's totally disingenuous to post pro-Ubuntu screeds in this NG.
>
> No what is disingenuous is that you only want to stop the PRO-Ubuntu
> "screeds."
>
> Why not try to stop the anti-Ubuntu guys first? Because you agree with
> them.
>
> Stop Frank first, then get back to me.
>
> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
>
Never happen because Frank is Lang's hero.
Alias