Vista users, you got to at least try ubuntu

  • Thread starter Thread starter Clear Windows
  • Start date Start date
I do believe that on Mon, 28 Apr 2008 02:59:35 -0400,
"windyvoice" <windyvoice@no.windyspam> wrote:

>> What exactly, is the issue with suggesting that folks use their vista
>> install to 'broaden their horizons'? The OP did not suggest that it was
>> time to dump vista for Linux - merely indicated that some folks might find
>> it interesting and educational to run it in a virtual machine on their
>> already installed vista.
>>
>> Methinks you protest too much.

>
>The problem is that this is a help forum not a Linux forum. It is meant to
>help Vista users not "broaden their horizons" toward anything but answering
>their problems. Methinks you are 12.


That was a good answer windyvoice.
I'm still running WinXP Pro and have never used Vista.
I read this newsgroup and seldom post only because I'm interested in
reading about how Vista users are coping and if I should update.
--

Erik Vastmasd
 
Vastmasd <email@invalid.ok> wrote:
> That was a good answer windyvoice.
> I'm still running WinXP Pro and have never used Vista.
> I read this newsgroup and seldom post only because I'm interested in
> reading about how Vista users are coping and if I should update.


Same here.

--
Mats Peterson
http://www.geocities.com/matsp888/
 
windyvoice wrote:

> "Clear Windows" <carlferedeck@wizzmail.com> wrote in message
> news:4813b9a2$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...
>> Vista users, you got to at least try ubuntu (if you are a bit geek at
>> least).
>>
>> Why do this? Well if you have a little spirit of adventure and want to
>> learn new stuff go for it.
>>
>> here is how you can do it without a problem at all
>>
>> download the virtual appliance from here and the vmware player and use
>> ubuntu in the virtual machine.... to start learning about it.
>>
>> Note you would need more than 1 gig of ram and a dual core cpu for
>> better results
>>
>> on this machine, a 4 core, 4 gig ram one the virtual machine goes
>> incredibly fast!
>>
>> Virtual appliance with vmware tools preinstalled
>>
>> http://jars.de/english/ubuntu-804-vmware-image-download-english
>>
>>
>> vmware player, free
>>
>> http://www.vmware.com/products/player/

>
> You know, people come here for help not to be assaulted by people like
> you


What is assaulting about sending a post to this group about Ubuntu?

It is an alternative to Vista. And there are plenty of people that are
pissed with Vista.

So again, what do you feel assaulted by?

> (your post are useless and are intended to start something or insult
> someone, get a life because you don't seem to have anything better to
> do).


Really? How do you know the intentions of the poster? Are you psychotic?

> Most have never used a computer before or are newbie's.


Welcome to the USENET!

> It is not
> a forum for users to try to find another OS, if they wanted that, they'd
> have done so or go to a forum about that subject.


Well, quite frankly, THIS IS NOT A FORUM! It is a newsgroup on the
USENET, and people will post here crap that you don't want to see.

Is it up to them to stop posting the crap you don't want to see, or is it
up to you to do something about that which YOU don't want to see?

If you believe in personal responsibility, then it is up to you to hide
from the crap that YOU don't want to see.

> It's sad you claim to use Linux but can't use Vista. I used Linux when
> it was new, a rip off of Unix, and let's face it, not many can compile a
> kernel, can they?


Really? You were using Linux before it was tied to a gui interface, like
Gnome or KDE?

> Also, if you want to play games you have to use
> Windows or Mac in dual boot or games that also work in Mac (The Sims 2).


You do realize that many games now do play on Linux, don't you?

You do realize that there are many games for Linux, don't you?

> Try to find popular games for Linux.


http://www.vgpro.com/article/5_killer_pc_games_playable_on_ub

> Oh, it is a great OS but limited
> in hardware support,


That depends. My old logitech wireless keyboard works with Ubuntu 8.04
AMD64, including its multimedia keys, however in Vista Ultimate x64 SP1
none of the multimedia keys work.

The my old logitech bluetooth mouse works best in Ubuntu by disabling the
bluetooth, and using it as an rf mouse, but in vista it is fully
functional.

And the drivers for my newer nvidia card seem more stable to me in Ubuntu
than Vista, even with MS's dictatorial rule over 64 bit drivers.

> gaming ability, and the type of users that can
> actually figure it out (my family, for instance).


Once setup, the learning curve is about the same as moving from XP to
Vista.

> You can run Linux
> from a disk or flash drive.


Yeah, try running the bloat that is Vista from a thumb drive.

> You are, I can tell, a youngster and probably only know the little
> things you read here and there without clear understanding of them.


And you sound like an old f*#cker, that is using old info. Linux has
matured since the last time you used it.

Maybe you should try out Ubuntu using wubi.

> You
> weren't there when there were no real OS's. It was do it yourself. We
> were thankful for Unix and DOS when they came into use but few used a
> computer then. Now, everyone seems to have a computer and most don't
> know how to use it with something as simple as Windows or Mac. How do
> you expect them to use Linux?


Most people use a computer to do simple communications and information
gathering. They don't need to know how to do complex tasks with a
computer, so what modern OS they use really doesn't matter, as long as
they can communicate with there friends, and read the news they want to
read.

> Do you call yourself "Clear Windows" because of your mental state?
> Just asking.


Shouldn't you call yourself "windybs?" You are certainly blowing a bunch
of it around here.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Former Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"
 
"ray" <ray@zianet.com> wrote in message
news:67kkluF2oqttlU3@mid.individual.net...
> On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 10:53:19 -0400, here wrote:
>
>> Besides, just because it's free doesn't make it worth replacing every
>> 6-18 months. I still have an old OEM '98SE set up for offline games and
>> homework for the grandkids.

>
> OK - so don't. There is no real need to "replace every 6-18 months" if
> you're happy with what you have. It is also quite trivial to do updates
> and upgrades in place - if you wish. Choice is really nice.



Ah, but you neglect to mention, after 18 months, there are no more patches,
no updates, support has ended. Need to replace any hardware and you're
stuck. Besides, you're limited on hardware support, too.

Tech: MAC or Windows?
User: Ubuntu
Tech: Sorry, we don't support anything but MAC and Windows.
 
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 02:59:35 -0400, windyvoice wrote:

>> What exactly, is the issue with suggesting that folks use their vista
>> install to 'broaden their horizons'? The OP did not suggest that it was
>> time to dump vista for Linux - merely indicated that some folks might
>> find it interesting and educational to run it in a virtual machine on
>> their already installed vista.
>>
>> Methinks you protest too much.

>
> The problem is that this is a help forum not a Linux forum. It is meant
> to help Vista users not "broaden their horizons" toward anything but
> answering their problems. Methinks you are 12.


Strange. I don't see "help" in the group name - though I do see "general".
 
"ray" wrote in message news:67m7kgF2pi77nU4@mid.individual.net...
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 02:59:35 -0400, windyvoice wrote:
>
>>> What exactly, is the issue with suggesting that folks use their vista
>>> install to 'broaden their horizons'? The OP did not suggest that it was
>>> time to dump vista for Linux - merely indicated that some folks might
>>> find it interesting and educational to run it in a virtual machine on
>>> their already installed vista.
>>>
>>> Methinks you protest too much.

>>
>> The problem is that this is a help forum not a Linux forum. It is meant
>> to help Vista users not "broaden their horizons" toward anything but
>> answering their problems. Methinks you are 12.

>
> Strange. I don't see "help" in the group name - though I do see "general".


microsoft.public.windows.vista.general

General questions about MS Windows Vista! Period! End of discussion.
 
here wrote:

> "ray" <ray@zianet.com> wrote in message
> news:67kkluF2oqttlU3@mid.individual.net...
>> On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 10:53:19 -0400, here wrote:
>>
>>> Besides, just because it's free doesn't make it worth replacing every
>>> 6-18 months. I still have an old OEM '98SE set up for offline games
>>> and homework for the grandkids.

>>
>> OK - so don't. There is no real need to "replace every 6-18 months" if
>> you're happy with what you have. It is also quite trivial to do updates
>> and upgrades in place - if you wish. Choice is really nice.

>
>
> Ah, but you neglect to mention, after 18 months, there are no more
> patches, no updates, support has ended.


"Ubuntu is designed with security in mind. You get free security updates
for at least 18 months on the desktop and server. With the Long Term
Support (LTS) version you get three years support on the desktop, and
five years on the server. There is no extra fee for the LTS version, we
make our very best work available to everyone on the same free terms.
Upgrades to new versions of Ubuntu are and always will be free of
charge." - http://www.ubuntu.com/products/whatisubuntu

Ubuntu 8.04 is a LTS version, so you get three years of support and
updates, and by the end of 8.04 life cycle, Ubuntu should have released
one maybe two more LTS versions.

And moving to newer versions of Ubuntu is much simpler & faster than
upgrading Windows versions.

> Need to replace any hardware and
> you're stuck. Besides, you're limited on hardware support, too.
>
> Tech: MAC or Windows?
> User: Ubuntu
> Tech: Sorry, we don't support anything but MAC and Windows.


Hell, more than half of them don't support MAC either. But who cares?!
I haven't relied on tech support of any kind, hardware or software, since
before they were all outsourced to India.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Former Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"
 
here wrote:

> "ray" wrote in message news:67m7kgF2pi77nU4@mid.individual.net...
>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 02:59:35 -0400, windyvoice wrote:
>>
>>>> What exactly, is the issue with suggesting that folks use their vista
>>>> install to 'broaden their horizons'? The OP did not suggest that it
>>>> was time to dump vista for Linux - merely indicated that some folks
>>>> might find it interesting and educational to run it in a virtual
>>>> machine on their already installed vista.
>>>>
>>>> Methinks you protest too much.
>>>
>>> The problem is that this is a help forum not a Linux forum. It is
>>> meant to help Vista users not "broaden their horizons" toward anything
>>> but answering their problems. Methinks you are 12.

>>
>> Strange. I don't see "help" in the group name - though I do see
>> "general".

>
> microsoft.public.windows.vista.general
>
> General questions about MS Windows Vista! Period! End of discussion.


You forgot the "public" part. And also offering alternatives to people's
Vista frustrations can be of help to those suffering using Vista.

So it's too bad for you, but you cannot end the discussion, except by
leaving it yourself.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Former Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"
 
In article <8FkRj.52389$jM2.44430@fe60.usenetserver.com>,
dontemailme@anywhereintheknownuniverse.org says...
> It is an alternative to Vista. And there are plenty of people that are
> pissed with Vista.


Kurt, Ubuntu is not an alternative to vista any more than a transistor
radio is an alternative to a Home Theater system.

While Ubuntu has some nice features, and while it works well if all you
interact with is yourself or only open-source users, it does not work
well in a MS dominated shop and it does not provide the gaming platform
that is currently what most people play on.

--
- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)
 
Leythos wrote:

> In article <8FkRj.52389$jM2.44430@fe60.usenetserver.com>,
> dontemailme@anywhereintheknownuniverse.org says...
>> It is an alternative to Vista. And there are plenty of people that are
>> pissed with Vista.

>
> Kurt, Ubuntu is not an alternative to vista any more than a transistor
> radio is an alternative to a Home Theater system.
>
> While Ubuntu has some nice features, and while it works well if all you
> interact with is yourself or only open-source users, it does not work
> well in a MS dominated shop


Only in those shops where the techs are ignorant of everything not MS.

Hell, I have a mixed network at home, and my Ubuntu install kicks Vista
ass over the network, though XP is the clear champ at network speed.

> and it does not provide the gaming platform
> that is currently what most people play on.


Hmmm. Seems to me that most people play their games on an XBox, a
Playstation, or a Wii. PC gaming, in general, has been in decline for
quite a while.

And Ubuntu is getting much better at it.

http://www.vgpro.com/article/5_killer_pc_games_playable_on_ub

But gaming is not a main reason I prefer using Linux on a day-to-day
basis rather than Windows. The main reason I prefer Linux over Windows
is security. I have a "peace of mind" while surfing the web, that no
Windows user will ever have.

Especially a Windows user that has a Symantec security product
installed! )

--
Peace!
Kurt
Former Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"
 
kurttrail wrote:
> Leythos wrote:
>
>> In article <8FkRj.52389$jM2.44430@fe60.usenetserver.com>,
>> dontemailme@anywhereintheknownuniverse.org says...
>>> It is an alternative to Vista. And there are plenty of people that are
>>> pissed with Vista.

>> Kurt, Ubuntu is not an alternative to vista any more than a transistor
>> radio is an alternative to a Home Theater system.
>>
>> While Ubuntu has some nice features, and while it works well if all you
>> interact with is yourself or only open-source users, it does not work
>> well in a MS dominated shop

>
> Only in those shops where the techs are ignorant of everything not MS.
>
> Hell, I have a mixed network at home, and my Ubuntu install kicks Vista
> ass over the network, though XP is the clear champ at network speed.
>
>> and it does not provide the gaming platform
>> that is currently what most people play on.

>
> Hmmm. Seems to me that most people play their games on an XBox, a
> Playstation, or a Wii. PC gaming, in general, has been in decline for
> quite a while.
>
> And Ubuntu is getting much better at it.
>
> http://www.vgpro.com/article/5_killer_pc_games_playable_on_ub
>
> But gaming is not a main reason I prefer using Linux on a day-to-day
> basis rather than Windows. The main reason I prefer Linux over Windows
> is security. I have a "peace of mind" while surfing the web, that no
> Windows user will ever have.
>
> Especially a Windows user that has a Symantec security product
> installed! )
>


The fact that Linux is *bulletproof* compared to Windows when it comes
to viruses and malware *really* pisses off Windows fanboys.

Alias
 
Yes, people are frustrated with Vista and that is why they are posting
here......about Vista not Linux. That is the point your feeble mind can't
grasp. They need help with a Windows OS not to be bombarded by Linux of any
flavor.

I am not the one talking about Linux in a VISTA NEWSGROUP and trying to
convert everyone to it. If I wanted to do that I'd go to a Linux
newsgroup/forum. Your group, on the other hand, spouts all this mess on a
newsgroup/forum that has nothing to do with Linux. Is it because you have
nothing better to do with your lives than harrass others or cause problems
when there should be none? As for the forum part, I am posting in Microsoft
Communities, where are you posting to? As for USENET, this is a Vista
newsgroup/forum not a Linux one. If you don't like Windows, don't use it.

If simple communication were all these people cared about then any simple OS
is the way to go. This is not the case. They want to play games, keep
records, chat, do research, burn disks, edit video and photos, have an OS
that their hardware will actually work with and drivers to update with.
Video card drivers may work for you but that may be the only piece of
hardware that needs drivers and the video drivers don't work for everyone.
And you may need to run command line to install them, even in Ubuntu 8.04.
As for Wine, which allows you to play some games in Linux, it isn't easy to
configure and not always stable and doesn't always work. Also, the games
that are available are a few online games. So, sorry, if you want to play,
say, The Witcher, you are out of luck.

Actually, I am a mean redhead who doesn't tolerate ignorance easily, not an
old crone, yet. I've used computers since I was a kid and build them. I
also don't use profanity to get my point across since that seems to be the
last resort of a limited, feeble mind that can't reason or a kiddie that
doesn't know or care how to reason.

Linux hasn't changed that much. It has improved somewhat but not to a
degree that a casual user would want in an OS. It is not for people who
have trouble using something as simple as Windows. The learning curve for
someone like that is not what it would be for an experienced computer user.
For instance to install an bitorrant app in Ubuntu, don't you have to type
in:

cd Desktop/
tar xjf Azureus_2.3.0.4_linux.PPC.tar.bz2
sudo mv azureus/ /usr/lib/
cd /usr/lib/azureus
../azureus

And to install Java:

sudo apt-get install fakeroot java-package java-common
fakeroot make-jpkg jre-1_5_0_05-linux-i586.bin
sudo dpkg -i sun-j2re1.5_1.5.0+update05_i386.deb
sudo update-alternatives -config java
java -version

As for old Linux, yes, I used it and the new Linux with the GUI KDE which is
better than Gnome. It is still not simple for the average user, who can't
even use Windows (any version) correctly or to install a simple app.
Synaptic doesn't let you just point and click everything. Not everything is
listed under it. Only simple programs can be installed through add/remove
programs and the more complicated ones may have to be done manually. So
much for no command lines in new Linux.

Can people who have trouble with point and click do this? You are blowing
in the wind. Oh, and video drivers, I found this, a more simple way to
install video drivers:

http://www.albertomilone.com/latest_nvidia_udsf_feisty.html so it isn't so
simple.
http://albertomilone.com/pmwiki/pmwiki.php?n=Main.EnvyNG-InstructionsForUbuntu

Or use this:

sudo apt-get install build-essential pkg-config xserver-xorg-dev
gksudo gedit /etc/default/linux-restricted-modules-common
DISABLED_MODULES="nv"
sudo apt-get --purge remove nvidia-glx nvidia-settings nvidia-glx-legacy
sudo rm /etc/init.d/nvidia-glx
Ctrl+Alt+F2
sudo /etc/init.d/kdm stop
sudo sh NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-9755-pkg1.run
sudo nano /etc/X11/xorg.conf


Section "Device"
Identifier "NVIDIA Corporation NVIDIA Default Card"
Driver "nvidia"
EndSection

sudo /etc/init.d/kdm start
glxinfo

glxinfo | grep version
glxinfo | grep direct

nvidia-settings

Oh, yeah, that's real simple. If someone wants to play around with it
then do it from a flash drive or disk to see how they like it. Obviously,
what I say disturbs you because you resort to profanity and grasping at
straws, not to mention insulting me because that is all you know how to do.
Have you even USED Linux, any Linux?

And you are right. I should block you. But your little group is so
amusing. You make me laugh. I may block you tomorrow.
 
Alias wrote:

> kurttrail wrote:
>
>> Leythos wrote:
>>
>>> In article <8FkRj.52389$jM2.44430@fe60.usenetserver.com>,
>>> dontemailme@anywhereintheknownuniverse.org says...
>>>
>>>> It is an alternative to Vista. And there are plenty of people that are
>>>> pissed with Vista.
>>>
>>> Kurt, Ubuntu is not an alternative to vista any more than a transistor
>>> radio is an alternative to a Home Theater system.
>>>
>>> While Ubuntu has some nice features, and while it works well if all you
>>> interact with is yourself or only open-source users, it does not work
>>> well in a MS dominated shop

>>
>>
>> Only in those shops where the techs are ignorant of everything not MS.
>>
>> Hell, I have a mixed network at home, and my Ubuntu install kicks
>> Vista ass over the network, though XP is the clear champ at network
>> speed.
>>
>>> and it does not provide the gaming platform
>>> that is currently what most people play on.

>>
>>
>> Hmmm. Seems to me that most people play their games on an XBox, a
>> Playstation, or a Wii. PC gaming, in general, has been in decline for
>> quite a while.
>>
>> And Ubuntu is getting much better at it.
>>
>> http://www.vgpro.com/article/5_killer_pc_games_playable_on_ub
>>
>> But gaming is not a main reason I prefer using Linux on a day-to-day
>> basis rather than Windows. The main reason I prefer Linux over
>> Windows is security. I have a "peace of mind" while surfing the web,
>> that no Windows user will ever have.
>>
>> Especially a Windows user that has a Symantec security product
>> installed! )
>>

>
> The fact that Linux is *bulletproof* compared to Windows when it comes
> to viruses and malware *really* pisses off Windows fanboys.
>
> Alias


No, what really pisses a lying sheep-fukker like you off is the fact
that Vista is just as bullet-proof as ubuntu...LOL!
Frank
 
Alias wrote:

> The fact that Linux is *bulletproof* compared to Windows when it comes
> to viruses and malware *really* pisses off Windows fanboys.
>
> Alias


Now, I'm gonna quibble with you a bit.

Linux is more like a Kevlar vest, bullet-resistant, rather than bullet-
proof.

Nothing is 100% secure, and nothing will ever be 100% secure, as long as
us imperfect humans have a hand in it.

But the bullet-resistance of Linux does piss off Windows fanboys, that
need to cut off their computer's left nut in order to feel some measure
of security.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Former Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"
 
"Alias" <iamalias@removegmail.com> wrote in message
news:fv50m2$lr6$1@aioe.org...
> kurttrail wrote:
>> Leythos wrote:
>>

>
> The fact that Linux is *bulletproof* compared to Windows when it comes to
> viruses and malware *really* pisses off Windows fanboys.
>
> Alias


Actually, it isn't bulletproof. If it were, why do they make a firewall and
AV for it? An article from 2003

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2003/10/06/linux_vs_windows_viruses/

and these:

http://www.desktoplinux.com/articles/AT3307459975.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Linux_computer_viruses

http://www.kaspersky.com/anti-virus_linux_workstation

http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2116855/linux-lined-virus-target

http://www.iosn.net/network/news/news_item.2006-05-03.4448154883

http://antivirus.about.com/od/linuxunixviruses/Linux_Unix_Viruses.htm
 
windyvoice wrote:

> "Alias" <iamalias@removegmail.com> wrote in message
> news:fv50m2$lr6$1@aioe.org...
>
>>kurttrail wrote:
>>
>>>Leythos wrote:
>>>

>>
>>The fact that Linux is *bulletproof* compared to Windows when it comes to
>>viruses and malware *really* pisses off Windows fanboys.
>>
>>Alias

>
>
> Actually, it isn't bulletproof. If it were, why do they make a firewall and
> AV for it? An article from 2003
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2003/10/06/linux_vs_windows_viruses/
>
> and these:
>
> http://www.desktoplinux.com/articles/AT3307459975.html
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Linux_computer_viruses
>
> http://www.kaspersky.com/anti-virus_linux_workstation
>
> http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2116855/linux-lined-virus-target
>
> http://www.iosn.net/network/news/news_item.2006-05-03.4448154883
>
> http://antivirus.about.com/od/linuxunixviruses/Linux_Unix_Viruses.htm
>
>
>
>
>

Right and why does the upgrade dialogue say..."and to improve security"?
alias is a known and admitted liar. Don't believe one word that comes
out of his vile POS mouth.
Frank
 
In article <_wnRj.27205$YY2.2965@fe038.usenetserver.com>,
dontemailme@anywhereintheknownuniverse.org says...
> Leythos wrote:
>
> > In article <8FkRj.52389$jM2.44430@fe60.usenetserver.com>,
> > dontemailme@anywhereintheknownuniverse.org says...
> >> It is an alternative to Vista. And there are plenty of people that are
> >> pissed with Vista.

> >
> > Kurt, Ubuntu is not an alternative to vista any more than a transistor
> > radio is an alternative to a Home Theater system.
> >
> > While Ubuntu has some nice features, and while it works well if all you
> > interact with is yourself or only open-source users, it does not work
> > well in a MS dominated shop

>
> Only in those shops where the techs are ignorant of everything not MS.


No, not true again, and overly generalized on your part. Many of my own
customers run a Linux and Windows solution for their servers because of
licensing costs, but, each has a strength and a weakness.

> Hell, I have a mixed network at home, and my Ubuntu install kicks Vista
> ass over the network, though XP is the clear champ at network speed.


LOL, and I run Ubuntu and Fedora and Fedora is leaps ahead of Ubuntu for
anything a serious user would want. I run then with Vista and XP Prof as
well as SBS 2003, Server 2003 and Server 2008 and two Linux servers for
web apps and My SQL databases....

> > and it does not provide the gaming platform
> > that is currently what most people play on.

>
> Hmmm. Seems to me that most people play their games on an XBox, a
> Playstation, or a Wii. PC gaming, in general, has been in decline for
> quite a while.
>
> And Ubuntu is getting much better at it.
>
> http://www.vgpro.com/article/5_killer_pc_games_playable_on_ub
>
> But gaming is not a main reason I prefer using Linux on a day-to-day
> basis rather than Windows. The main reason I prefer Linux over Windows
> is security. I have a "peace of mind" while surfing the web, that no
> Windows user will ever have.
>
> Especially a Windows user that has a Symantec security product
> installed! )


I've been working with computers since the 70's and never had a single
virus on a single computer that I control or maintain, not once, and I
don't attribute that to the OS at all - but I do find that I enjoy games
better on my Windows PC.

--
- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)
 
In article <fv50m2$lr6$1@aioe.org>, iamalias@removegmail.com says...
> The fact that Linux is *bulletproof* compared to Windows when it comes
> to viruses and malware *really* pisses off Windows fanboys.


And the fact that you can run a network with thousands of Windows PC's,
for 30 years (not that windows has been around that long) and never have
a compromised PC/Server in all that time must really piss your type off
Alias.

--
- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)
 
Frank wrote:

> No, what really pisses a lying sheep-fukker like you off is the fact
> that Vista is just as bullet-proof as ubuntu...LOL! Frank


LOL! You are just naturally pissed, Frank. As a matter of fact, I'd bet
that urine runs through your veins.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Former Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"
 
windyvoice wrote:

<snipped unread filibuster>

This is the USENET. Either deal with the anarchy, try to hide from it,
or get the f@#k out of Dodge City while you still can.

Those are your only really viable choices, as ranting about it ain't
gonna do nothing other than burn your own ass.

> And you are right. I should block you. But your little group is so
> amusing. You make me laugh. I may block you tomorrow.


Please do. Many people already have, many more will do so in the
future. C'est la vie.

Some people are uncomfortable dealing with free speech in its rawest
form, and need to hide themselves away from it. It's your choice to make
whether you are such an individual that is frightened by reading opinions
that merely are in opposition to your own.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Former Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"
 
Back
Top