Ubuntu Destroys Hard Disks. Be Careful !

  • Thread starter Thread starter krotch.kricket@gmail.com
  • Start date Start date
TONY TROMBOLI wrote:

> Yeah - That's a serious "bug" they have there.


The biggest bugs are between your ears.
--
Regards,
[tv]

....Incontinence Hotline, please hold.

Owner and proprietor, Trollus Amongus, LLC
 
Paul Knudsen wrote:

> On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 14:25:01 -0500, "TONY TROMBOLI" <tman@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>> If installing Ubuntu be careful for hdisk corruption. It will also
>>> over write your Windows partition rendering your data unrecoverable.

>
> Well, most people know enough to make a complete backup before doing
> an install like this.
>
> Still, I'm surprised Ubuntu does not at least ask before overwriting
> something.


It *does* ask
--
Windows - How do you want to be exploited today?
 
Paul Knudsen wrote:
> TONY TROMBOLI wrote:
>
>>> If installing Ubuntu be careful for hdisk corruption. It will also
>>> over write your Windows partition rendering your data unrecoverable.

>
> Well, most people know enough to make a complete backup before doing an
> install like this.
>
> Still, I'm surprised Ubuntu does not at least ask before overwriting
> something.


http://www.howtoforge.com/the_perfect_desktop_ubuntu_gutsy_gibbon

*Ready to install*

Your new operating system will now be install with the following settings:

Language: English
Keyboard layout: Germany - Eliminate dead keys
Name: olli
Login name: olli
Location: Europe/Berlin:
Migration Assistant

If you continue, the changes listed will be written to the disks.
Otherwise, you will be able to make further changes manually.

WARNING: This will destroy all data on any partitions yhou have removed as
well as on the partitions that are going to be formatted.

The partition tables of the following devices are changed:
SCSI1 (0,0,0) (sda)

The following partitions are going to be formatted:
partition #1 of SCSI1 (0,0,0)(sda) as ext3
partition #5 of SCSI1 (0,0,0)(sda) as swap

[Advanced...]

[(X)Cancel] [<- Back] [-> Install]

Step 7 of 7

--
HPT
 
forty-nine wrote:
> "Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message
> news:fiafo0$7rr$2@aioe.org...
>> forty-nine wrote:
>>> "Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:fi9uhl$f31$2@aioe.org...
>>>> TONY TROMBOLI wrote:
>>>>> <krotch.kricket@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:a95a95db-cd2f-4cba-ba4c-c4b09bb07855@w28g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>> If installing Ubuntu be careful for hdisk corruption. It will also
>>>>>> over write your Windows partition rendering your data unrecoverable.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.20/+bug/84603
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.15/+bug/53102
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Linux, the operating system that keeps you busy.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> TRUE. I tried a Ubuntu "Live CD" not too long ago to see what all
>>>>> the hype was about. It booted fine in my AMD 3.4Ghz + 1-Gig RAM
>>>>> machine that currently has Windows XP installed. I played around
>>>>> with Ubuntu and it ran OK. It was running from the CD so I could
>>>>> understand why it wasn't very zippy. The video was pretty slow
>>>>> using the generic driver from the CD but I could probably fix that
>>>>> eventually if I wanted to. It saw my NTFS drive which was neat at
>>>>> the time.
>>>>>
>>>>> So I'm done playing with Ubuntu and tell it to shutdown and it
>>>>> does. It tells me to remember to remove the Live CD which I do. The
>>>>> next time that I reboot my computer it simply doesn't boot. The
>>>>> boot sector or something was hosed. In the end I had to re-install
>>>>> Windows to FIX whatever it was that Ubuntu Live CD screwed up.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah - That's a serious "bug" they have there.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Your problem had nothing to do with the Live CD. I have run Live CDs
>>>> on dozens of computers with no ill effects at all. The Live CD
>>>> doesn't install *anything* unless you tell it to and you probably did.
>>>>
>>>> Alias
>>>
>>>
>>> And even if you tell it to install...It Still installs Nothing useful !
>>> You're damned if you do, you're damned if you don't.
>>>

>>
>> It's useful enough that I can use it to tell you you're full of it.
>>
>> Alias

>
>
> Full of what ?


If you have to ask, you'll never know.

> That I wouldn't install ubarktoo if it was free ?


Considering that "ubarktoo" doesn't exist ...

> I wouldn't...that's no lie.
>
> For being over 60, kinda late in life to be discovering new
> OS's....don't ya think ?


It's never too late to learn.

Alias
 
Peter Köhlmann wrote:
> Paul Knudsen wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 14:25:01 -0500, "TONY TROMBOLI" <tman@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>> If installing Ubuntu be careful for hdisk corruption. It will also
>>>> over write your Windows partition rendering your data unrecoverable.

>> Well, most people know enough to make a complete backup before doing
>> an install like this.
>>
>> Still, I'm surprised Ubuntu does not at least ask before overwriting
>> something.

>
> It *does* ask




He's been on this before. you won't get anywhere.
At the same time he said he couldn't get it to
install.
caver1
 
"Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message news:fiblto$kgm$1@aioe.org...
> forty-nine wrote:
>> "Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:fiafo0$7rr$2@aioe.org...
>>> forty-nine wrote:
>>>> "Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:fi9uhl$f31$2@aioe.org...
>>>>> TONY TROMBOLI wrote:
>>>>>> <krotch.kricket@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:a95a95db-cd2f-4cba-ba4c-c4b09bb07855@w28g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>> If installing Ubuntu be careful for hdisk corruption. It will also
>>>>>>> over write your Windows partition rendering your data unrecoverable.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.20/+bug/84603
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.15/+bug/53102
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Linux, the operating system that keeps you busy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> TRUE. I tried a Ubuntu "Live CD" not too long ago to see what all the
>>>>>> hype was about. It booted fine in my AMD 3.4Ghz + 1-Gig RAM machine
>>>>>> that currently has Windows XP installed. I played around with Ubuntu
>>>>>> and it ran OK. It was running from the CD so I could understand why
>>>>>> it wasn't very zippy. The video was pretty slow using the generic
>>>>>> driver from the CD but I could probably fix that eventually if I
>>>>>> wanted to. It saw my NTFS drive which was neat at the time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So I'm done playing with Ubuntu and tell it to shutdown and it does.
>>>>>> It tells me to remember to remove the Live CD which I do. The next
>>>>>> time that I reboot my computer it simply doesn't boot. The boot
>>>>>> sector or something was hosed. In the end I had to re-install Windows
>>>>>> to FIX whatever it was that Ubuntu Live CD screwed up.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah - That's a serious "bug" they have there.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Your problem had nothing to do with the Live CD. I have run Live CDs
>>>>> on dozens of computers with no ill effects at all. The Live CD doesn't
>>>>> install *anything* unless you tell it to and you probably did.
>>>>>
>>>>> Alias
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And even if you tell it to install...It Still installs Nothing useful !
>>>> You're damned if you do, you're damned if you don't.
>>>>
>>>
>>> It's useful enough that I can use it to tell you you're full of it.
>>>
>>> Alias

>>
>>
>> Full of what ?

>
> If you have to ask, you'll never know.
>
>> That I wouldn't install ubarktoo if it was free ?

>
> Considering that "ubarktoo" doesn't exist ...
>
>> I wouldn't...that's no lie.
>>
>> For being over 60, kinda late in life to be discovering new OS's....don't
>> ya think ?

>
> It's never too late to learn.
>
> Alias



I see you like to break up responses in order to change the context.
Is that a ubuntu trick ?
Like the way its GUI tries to give a crappy linux OS content.
If ubuntu is the future...its number 1 zealot has little left.
 
forty-nine wrote:
> "Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message
> news:fiblto$kgm$1@aioe.org...
>> forty-nine wrote:
>>> "Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:fiafo0$7rr$2@aioe.org...
>>>> forty-nine wrote:
>>>>> "Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:fi9uhl$f31$2@aioe.org...
>>>>>> TONY TROMBOLI wrote:
>>>>>>> <krotch.kricket@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:a95a95db-cd2f-4cba-ba4c-c4b09bb07855@w28g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If installing Ubuntu be careful for hdisk corruption. It will also
>>>>>>>> over write your Windows partition rendering your data
>>>>>>>> unrecoverable.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.20/+bug/84603
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.15/+bug/53102
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Linux, the operating system that keeps you busy.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> TRUE. I tried a Ubuntu "Live CD" not too long ago to see what all
>>>>>>> the hype was about. It booted fine in my AMD 3.4Ghz + 1-Gig RAM
>>>>>>> machine that currently has Windows XP installed. I played around
>>>>>>> with Ubuntu and it ran OK. It was running from the CD so I could
>>>>>>> understand why it wasn't very zippy. The video was pretty slow
>>>>>>> using the generic driver from the CD but I could probably fix
>>>>>>> that eventually if I wanted to. It saw my NTFS drive which was
>>>>>>> neat at the time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So I'm done playing with Ubuntu and tell it to shutdown and it
>>>>>>> does. It tells me to remember to remove the Live CD which I do.
>>>>>>> The next time that I reboot my computer it simply doesn't boot.
>>>>>>> The boot sector or something was hosed. In the end I had to
>>>>>>> re-install Windows to FIX whatever it was that Ubuntu Live CD
>>>>>>> screwed up.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yeah - That's a serious "bug" they have there.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your problem had nothing to do with the Live CD. I have run Live
>>>>>> CDs on dozens of computers with no ill effects at all. The Live CD
>>>>>> doesn't install *anything* unless you tell it to and you probably
>>>>>> did.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> And even if you tell it to install...It Still installs Nothing
>>>>> useful !
>>>>> You're damned if you do, you're damned if you don't.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It's useful enough that I can use it to tell you you're full of it.
>>>>
>>>> Alias
>>>
>>>
>>> Full of what ?

>>
>> If you have to ask, you'll never know.
>>
>>> That I wouldn't install ubarktoo if it was free ?

>>
>> Considering that "ubarktoo" doesn't exist ...
>>
>>> I wouldn't...that's no lie.
>>>
>>> For being over 60, kinda late in life to be discovering new
>>> OS's....don't ya think ?

>>
>> It's never too late to learn.
>>
>> Alias

>
>
> I see you like to break up responses in order to change the context.
> Is that a ubuntu trick ?


Google for in line replies. I've been doing it since Windows 95, long
before I had even heard of Linux.

> Like the way its GUI tries to give a crappy linux OS content.
> If ubuntu is the future...its number 1 zealot has little left.


Yawn, we're through, forty-nine.

Alias
 
"Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message news:fiafo0$7rr$2@aioe.org...
> forty-nine wrote:
>> "Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:fi9uhl$f31$2@aioe.org...
>>> TONY TROMBOLI wrote:
>>>> <krotch.kricket@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:a95a95db-cd2f-4cba-ba4c-c4b09bb07855@w28g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>>>> If installing Ubuntu be careful for hdisk corruption. It will also
>>>>> over write your Windows partition rendering your data unrecoverable.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.20/+bug/84603
>>>>>
>>>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.15/+bug/53102
>>>>>
>>>>> Linux, the operating system that keeps you busy.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> TRUE. I tried a Ubuntu "Live CD" not too long ago to see what all the
>>>> hype was about. It booted fine in my AMD 3.4Ghz + 1-Gig RAM machine
>>>> that currently has Windows XP installed. I played around with Ubuntu
>>>> and it ran OK. It was running from the CD so I could understand why it
>>>> wasn't very zippy. The video was pretty slow using the generic driver
>>>> from the CD but I could probably fix that eventually if I wanted to. It
>>>> saw my NTFS drive which was neat at the time.
>>>>
>>>> So I'm done playing with Ubuntu and tell it to shutdown and it does. It
>>>> tells me to remember to remove the Live CD which I do. The next time
>>>> that I reboot my computer it simply doesn't boot. The boot sector or
>>>> something was hosed. In the end I had to re-install Windows to FIX
>>>> whatever it was that Ubuntu Live CD screwed up.
>>>>
>>>> Yeah - That's a serious "bug" they have there.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Your problem had nothing to do with the Live CD. I have run Live CDs on
>>> dozens of computers with no ill effects at all. The Live CD doesn't
>>> install *anything* unless you tell it to and you probably did.
>>>
>>> Alias

>>
>>
>> And even if you tell it to install...It Still installs Nothing useful !
>> You're damned if you do, you're damned if you don't.
>>

>
> It's useful enough that I can use it to tell you you're full of it.
>

Yea, Ubuntu is useful for checking e-mail and surfing on the internet. If
you need to do real work, install a REAL OS like Windows XP.


> Alias
 
"forty-nine" <49@linux.sux> wrote in message news:fib2ah$skr$1@aioe.org...
> "Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message
> news:fiafo0$7rr$2@aioe.org...
>> forty-nine wrote:
>>> "Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:fi9uhl$f31$2@aioe.org...
>>>> TONY TROMBOLI wrote:
>>>>> <krotch.kricket@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:a95a95db-cd2f-4cba-ba4c-c4b09bb07855@w28g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>> If installing Ubuntu be careful for hdisk corruption. It will also
>>>>>> over write your Windows partition rendering your data unrecoverable.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.20/+bug/84603
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.15/+bug/53102
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Linux, the operating system that keeps you busy.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> TRUE. I tried a Ubuntu "Live CD" not too long ago to see what all the
>>>>> hype was about. It booted fine in my AMD 3.4Ghz + 1-Gig RAM machine
>>>>> that currently has Windows XP installed. I played around with Ubuntu
>>>>> and it ran OK. It was running from the CD so I could understand why it
>>>>> wasn't very zippy. The video was pretty slow using the generic driver
>>>>> from the CD but I could probably fix that eventually if I wanted to.
>>>>> It saw my NTFS drive which was neat at the time.
>>>>>
>>>>> So I'm done playing with Ubuntu and tell it to shutdown and it does.
>>>>> It tells me to remember to remove the Live CD which I do. The next
>>>>> time that I reboot my computer it simply doesn't boot. The boot sector
>>>>> or something was hosed. In the end I had to re-install Windows to FIX
>>>>> whatever it was that Ubuntu Live CD screwed up.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah - That's a serious "bug" they have there.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Your problem had nothing to do with the Live CD. I have run Live CDs on
>>>> dozens of computers with no ill effects at all. The Live CD doesn't
>>>> install *anything* unless you tell it to and you probably did.
>>>>
>>>> Alias
>>>
>>>
>>> And even if you tell it to install...It Still installs Nothing useful !
>>> You're damned if you do, you're damned if you don't.
>>>

>>
>> It's useful enough that I can use it to tell you you're full of it.
>>
>> Alias

>
>
> Full of what ?
> That I wouldn't install ubarktoo if it was free ?
> I wouldn't...that's no lie.
>
> For being over 60, kinda late in life to be discovering new OS's....don't
> ya think ?


It's not you. Ubuntu is really just a TOY OS for geeks and nerds who like
to play around with their computers. With Ubuntu being FREE you would think
that more people would rush out and get it. Not the case. People try
Ubuntu/Linux, realise what junk it is and go back to Windows.


>
 
In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Paul Hovnanian P.E.
.
wrote
on Sat, 24 Nov 2007 20:37:40 -0800
<4748FC14.7BCF215F@hovnanian.com>:
> krotch.kricket@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> If installing Ubuntu be careful for hdisk corruption. It will also
>> over write your Windows partition

> [snip]
>
> Good.
>
> Now, your point is what exactly?
>


Actually, I'd quibble with that.

[1] Of course one should be careful regarding partitioning.
Any existing data is at risk if the system installer's
sloppy, regardless of whether it's Windows, DOS, Linux,
FreeBSD, or a special homebrew affair one is tinkering
with.

[2] Because Windows is horrid, one might as well take out
the partition. That is a good thing, but...

[3] Because Windows is horrid, user data tends to end
up on the same partition as the Windows system in most
OEM installations. This is *not* a good thing.

[4] I would posit that Linux distros should be smart
enough to repartition the drive, keeping the Windows data
(defragmenting/compressing it as necessary) in its own
partition and installing Linux on the newly available
free space. Tools such as 'ntfsresize' are readily
available, if a bit clumsy to use. I'll admit I've not
researched the issue, and Gentoo's a little peculiar in
that area anyway (as an analogy, Gentoo's a stick shift in
a world of automatics -- but once one gets the hang of it,
it shifts very smoothly IMO :-) ).

[5] If one has a brand new system, why does it have Windows
on it anyway? Preloads means Microsoft gets paid whether
one wanted the OS or not. Ideally, one would be required
to choose at the time of purchase -- and I'll admit I'm not
at all sure exactly how to structure this, mostly because
the default will probably end up being Windows again if
we're not careful.

It is also a little strange that OEMs haven't figured out
that one should put the Windows swap file in its own little
confined area, as opposed to allowing it to default to the
system partition. (In Linux, that's the rough equivalent
of putting a swap file in /usr or /var. I'd posit that
many Linux users never bother to create swapfiles, but
just let the installer create a default swap partition.)

The fact that Windows allows autoadjustment of the swap
file invites massive fragmentation of the system drive
at least if it's confined to its own partition, the
fragmentation is minimal unless the user decides to put
stuff there for some strange reason. But are the OEMs
being stupid here, or is Microsoft instructing them to
set it up this way and thereby encouraging just enough
bit rot for the consumers to go out and buy a new Vista
'puter for Xmas?

One wonders.

--
#191, ewill3@earthlink.net
Useless C++ Programming Idea #23291:
void f(item *p) { if(p != 0) delete p }

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
 
Last edited by a moderator:
"The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@sirius.tg00suus7038.net> wrote in message
news:83ir15-fan.ln1@sirius.tg00suus7038.net...


> The fact that Windows allows autoadjustment of the swap
> file invites massive fragmentation of the system drive
> at least if it's confined to its own partition, the
> fragmentation is minimal unless the user decides to put
> stuff there for some strange reason. But are the OEMs
> being stupid here, or is Microsoft instructing them to
> set it up this way and thereby encouraging just enough
> bit rot for the consumers to go out and buy a new Vista
> 'puter for Xmas?
>
> One wonders.


One wonders why they include a defragger if your theory were true.
 
"The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@sirius.tg00suus7038.net> wrote in message
news:83ir15-fan.ln1@sirius.tg00suus7038.net...
>
> It is also a little strange that OEMs haven't figured out
> that one should put the Windows swap file in its own little
> confined area, as opposed to allowing it to default to the
> system partition. (In Linux, that's the rough equivalent
> of putting a swap file in /usr or /var. I'd posit that
> many Linux users never bother to create swapfiles, but
> just let the installer create a default swap partition.)
>
> The fact that Windows allows autoadjustment of the swap
> file invites massive fragmentation of the system drive


In fact that tends to be irrelevant these days: with machines having > 1GB
RAM the swap file (or pagefile) usage is pretty minimal.....
 
Gordon wrote:

> "The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@sirius.tg00suus7038.net> wrote in
> message news:83ir15-fan.ln1@sirius.tg00suus7038.net...
>>
>> It is also a little strange that OEMs haven't figured out
>> that one should put the Windows swap file in its own little
>> confined area, as opposed to allowing it to default to the
>> system partition. (In Linux, that's the rough equivalent
>> of putting a swap file in /usr or /var. I'd posit that
>> many Linux users never bother to create swapfiles, but
>> just let the installer create a default swap partition.)
>>
>> The fact that Windows allows autoadjustment of the swap
>> file invites massive fragmentation of the system drive

>
> In fact that tends to be irrelevant these days: with machines having > 1GB
> RAM the swap file (or pagefile) usage is pretty minimal.....


It is not, and has never been.

Just ask Erik Funkenbusch. A few weeks ago he explained in lenghty detail
why windows starts to use swap very early.
Which is quite idiotic, but thats the way windows is set up.
--
The probability of someone watching you is proportional to the
stupidity of your action.
 
In comp.os.linux.advocacy, dennis@home
<dennis@killspam.kicks-ass.net>
wrote
on Mon, 26 Nov 2007 21:44:58 -0000
<#FtLdWHMIHA.1164@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl>:
>
>
> "The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@sirius.tg00suus7038.net> wrote in message
> news:83ir15-fan.ln1@sirius.tg00suus7038.net...
>
>
>> The fact that Windows allows autoadjustment of the swap
>> file invites massive fragmentation of the system drive
>> at least if it's confined to its own partition, the
>> fragmentation is minimal unless the user decides to put
>> stuff there for some strange reason. But are the OEMs
>> being stupid here, or is Microsoft instructing them to
>> set it up this way and thereby encouraging just enough
>> bit rot for the consumers to go out and buy a new Vista
>> 'puter for Xmas?
>>
>> One wonders.

>
> One wonders why they include a defragger if your theory were true.
>


Probably because someone complained. :-) Nor is it clear
how well the defragger can deal with a chopped-up paging
file (which is in use during defragmentation unless the
user closes all open apps, resets his virtual memory and
reboots, defrags, resets it again and reboots), as it is
open during system operation.

Still, a good point. I'm not sure there's an explicit
conspiracy here, admittedly ("never attribute to malice
that which can be attributed to stupidity"), but it's
not particularly good engineering IMO.

--
#191, ewill3@earthlink.net
Useless C++ Programming Idea #7878218:
class C { private: virtual void stupid() = 0 }

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
 
On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 14:25:01 -0500, "TONY TROMBOLI" <tman@gmail.com>
wrote:

>> If installing Ubuntu be careful for hdisk corruption. It will also
>> over write your Windows partition rendering your data unrecoverable.


Well, most people know enough to make a complete backup before doing
an install like this.

Still, I'm surprised Ubuntu does not at least ask before overwriting
something.
 
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 21:08:11 -0800, Paul Knudsen wrote:

> On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 14:25:01 -0500, "TONY TROMBOLI" <tman@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>> If installing Ubuntu be careful for hdisk corruption. It will also
>>> over write your Windows partition rendering your data unrecoverable.

>
> Well, most people know enough to make a complete backup before doing an
> install like this.
>
> Still, I'm surprised Ubuntu does not at least ask before overwriting
> something.


It asks, and not only does it ask, but it gives a complete list of all
partitions it will modify and how *before* doing so.

--
Stephan
1986 Pontiac Fiero GT

å›ã®äº‹æ€ã„出ã™æ—¥ãªã‚“ã¦ãªã„ã®ã¯
å›ã®äº‹å¿˜ã‚ŒãŸã¨ããŒãªã„ã‹ã‚‰
 
Yeah, It comes with a Gnome that feeds on Hard Drive platters.


Hello Paul,

> On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 14:25:01 -0500, "TONY TROMBOLI" <tman@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>> If installing Ubuntu be careful for hdisk corruption. It will also
>>> over write your Windows partition rendering your data unrecoverable.
>>>

> Well, most people know enough to make a complete backup before doing
> an install like this.
>
> Still, I'm surprised Ubuntu does not at least ask before overwriting
> something.
>
 
"Paul Knudsen" . schreef in bericht
news:rc4op31ppbh27afmp5760fs44eu157fs7r@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 14:25:01 -0500, "TONY TROMBOLI" <tman@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>> If installing Ubuntu be careful for hdisk corruption. It will also
>>> over write your Windows partition rendering your data unrecoverable.

>
> Well, most people know enough to make a complete backup before doing
> an install like this.
>
> Still, I'm surprised Ubuntu does not at least ask before overwriting
> something.



Oh , you mean:
sudo mkfs.cramfs (This will format your hard drive) - No administrator
rights needed!
Ubuntu is scary, huh!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In article <20080127113731.3A32E1C00084@mwinf6202.orange.nl>,
Clogwog <BWAHAHAHAAA@BWAHAHAHAAA.LOL> wrote:
>
>sudo mkfs.cramfs (This will format your hard drive) - No administrator
>rights needed!


What's sudo, then?
 
Back
Top