J
Jupiter Jones [MVP]
I call you a stalker because that is what you do.
You do it and you can not deny it.
Adam is a stalker.
Read my post and the post I replied, probably for the first time.
What you said has NOTHING to do with it.
That is one of the things that show you as a stalker.
Your need to simply attack whether there is relevance or not.
Whether you can contribute or not.
"...what would you call Frank?"
It is also irrelevant, but that is what you must do when you have
nothing of substance.
It is noted you are comparing your actions with someone whose actions
you hate.
Apparently you see yourself as his equal in at least one way otherwise
there would be no reason for your comparison.
--
Jupiter Jones [MVP]
http://www3.telus.net/dandemar
http://www.dts-l.org
"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message
news:9th5a35dtbcb6gcs0us6t4q6hb7u3o0t1r@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 20:39:55 -0600, "Jupiter Jones [MVP]"
> <jones_jupiter@hotnomail.com> wrote:
>
>>Adam the stalker Again.
>
> Talk about being feeble. You can't counter any argument I've made,
> so
> just keep calling me a stalker. Using your logic what would you call
> Frank?
You do it and you can not deny it.
Adam is a stalker.
Read my post and the post I replied, probably for the first time.
What you said has NOTHING to do with it.
That is one of the things that show you as a stalker.
Your need to simply attack whether there is relevance or not.
Whether you can contribute or not.
"...what would you call Frank?"
It is also irrelevant, but that is what you must do when you have
nothing of substance.
It is noted you are comparing your actions with someone whose actions
you hate.
Apparently you see yourself as his equal in at least one way otherwise
there would be no reason for your comparison.
--
Jupiter Jones [MVP]
http://www3.telus.net/dandemar
http://www.dts-l.org
"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message
news:9th5a35dtbcb6gcs0us6t4q6hb7u3o0t1r@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 20:39:55 -0600, "Jupiter Jones [MVP]"
> <jones_jupiter@hotnomail.com> wrote:
>
>>Adam the stalker Again.
>
> Talk about being feeble. You can't counter any argument I've made,
> so
> just keep calling me a stalker. Using your logic what would you call
> Frank?