Re: Linux hits 6.1% on March!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Moshe Goldfarb
  • Start date Start date
Moshe Goldfarb wrote:

> That's a Roy Schestowitz administered site so I will not go there for fear
> of getting a virus or trojan or something.
>

Must be awful living in a constant state of fear of visiting websites
because of the possibility of getting "a virus or trojan or something". I
guess that is just part of the Windoze experience. It's very much like Bush
and the neocons, keeping everyone in fear of terrorist attacks as a way to
better control people. Does Vista have a gadget that presents homeland
security color-coded security alerts when surfing the web? If not, it
should.

Use Windoze and Be Afraid, Be Very Afraid.

Cheers.

--
The world can't afford the rich.

alt.os.linux.ubuntu - where the lunatic Hadron is a "Linux advocate"

Francis (Frank) adds a new "gadget" to his Vista box ...
Download it here: http://tinyurl.com/2hnof6
 
* dennis@home peremptorily fired off this memo:

> "Josef Moellers" <josef.moellers@fujitsu-siemens.com> wrote in message
> news:fsvprq$ns1$1@nntp.fujitsu-siemens.com...
>
>> I 100% agree to you. Let everyone chose the OS that they want to use. Let
>> no-one interfere e.g. by making documents accessible only to those using
>> office systems of one manufacturer. Let no-one interfere e.g. by making
>> web sites accessible only to those using browsers of one manufacturer. Let
>> no-one interfere e.g. by making hardware accessible only to those using
>> OSes of one manufacturer.

>
> Why do you want to remove choice from the people above?


How do you get /that/ interpretation of the above, dennis-at-home?

> What do you have against free choice?


Nothing. Yet you spin his words as if they mean the opposite.

Why are you doing this, dennis-at-home?

> Where does it say that if I want to build a site I should have to cater for
> everyone?


But, /now/ you are saying /you/ want the option of "removing choice".

Is it me that is confused, or you?

> Why do you want choice but deny it to others?


Ah, it is you that is confused.

--
Until we're educating every kid in a fantastic way, until every inner city
is cleaned up, there is no shortage of things to do.
-- Bill Gates
 
Linonut <linonut@bollsouth.nut> writes:

> * dennis@home peremptorily fired off this memo:
>
>> "Josef Moellers" <josef.moellers@fujitsu-siemens.com> wrote in message
>> news:fsvprq$ns1$1@nntp.fujitsu-siemens.com...
>>
>>> I 100% agree to you. Let everyone chose the OS that they want to use. Let
>>> no-one interfere e.g. by making documents accessible only to those using
>>> office systems of one manufacturer. Let no-one interfere e.g. by making
>>> web sites accessible only to those using browsers of one manufacturer. Let
>>> no-one interfere e.g. by making hardware accessible only to those using
>>> OSes of one manufacturer.

>>
>> Why do you want to remove choice from the people above?

>
> How do you get /that/ interpretation of the above, dennis-at-home?
>
>> What do you have against free choice?

>
> Nothing. Yet you spin his words as if they mean the opposite.
>
> Why are you doing this, dennis-at-home?
>
>> Where does it say that if I want to build a site I should have to cater for
>> everyone?

>
> But, /now/ you are saying /you/ want the option of "removing choice".


No. He wants the choice for who HE caters to. How is that so hard for
even a thicky like you to comprehend?

>
> Is it me that is confused, or you?
>


It's you. As usual.

>> Why do you want choice but deny it to others?

>
> Ah, it is you that is confused.



No. He makes perfect sense.


--
revision 1.17.2.7
date: 2001/05/31 21:32:44 author: branden state: Exp lines: +1 -1
ARRRRGH!! GOT THE G** D*** SENSE OF A F******* TEST BACKWARDS!
 
Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Apr 2008 09:10:53 +0200, Josef Moellers wrote:


>> Even if Linux is in the less-than-1%-area: each and every Linux-user
>> uses it because of its merits, not because it came bundeled with the
>> computer they bought or someone forces them to use it. Some people
>> (including me) even use it *against* pressure from higher places to use
>> another OS.
>>
>> *That's* the difference.

>
> Noble, however most people just want to get work done not go on some
> religious pilgrimage.


BTW I wasn't fishing for compliments, I was trying to say that even
without a multi-billion advertising campaign, even with the windo
ocasionally blowing right into our faces, at least one in 163 desktops
is running Linux!

--
These are my personal views and not those of Fujitsu Siemens Computers!
Josef Möllers (Pinguinpfleger bei FSC)
If failure had no penalty success would not be a prize (T. Pratchett)
Company Details: http://www.fujitsu-siemens.com/imprint.html
 
What? wrote:

What?

--

A US president declared war on poverty. Poverty won.
Another US president declared a war on drugs. Drugs won.
This US president declared a war on terror. Terror won.
Next?
 
Re: Ubuntu ain't worth a CR@P !!!

"Alias" <iamalias@nospamgmail.com> wrote in message
news:ft03ha$m9s$3@aioe.org...
>
> No, Windows is for losers like you and Ubuntu is for people who want the
> freedom to use a computer without having to kiss MS' ass and without
> having to worry about viruses and malware.
>
> Alias


No you have it totally wrong. Ubuntu is for pimply headed teenagers who
can't get a date and for geeks who want to tinker. To get any real work
done, you need Windows XP or Vista.

Install a good antivirus and watch where you surf and you should be fine.

You can't really do anything with Ubuntu. Look at yourself. All you do each
and every day is post about Ubuntu. You can't be doing any real work! See
what I mean?

Oh yea, you play a few games on your Windows box.
 
Hadron wrote:

> Linonut <linonut@bollsouth.nut> writes:
>
>> * dennis@home peremptorily fired off this memo:
>>
>>> "Josef Moellers" <josef.moellers@fujitsu-siemens.com> wrote in message
>>> news:fsvprq$ns1$1@nntp.fujitsu-siemens.com...
>>>
>>>> I 100% agree to you. Let everyone chose the OS that they want to use.
>>>> Let no-one interfere e.g. by making documents accessible only to those
>>>> using office systems of one manufacturer. Let no-one interfere e.g. by
>>>> making web sites accessible only to those using browsers of one
>>>> manufacturer. Let no-one interfere e.g. by making hardware accessible
>>>> only to those using OSes of one manufacturer.
>>>
>>> Why do you want to remove choice from the people above?

>>
>> How do you get /that/ interpretation of the above, dennis-at-home?
>>
>>> What do you have against free choice?

>>
>> Nothing. Yet you spin his words as if they mean the opposite.
>>
>> Why are you doing this, dennis-at-home?
>>
>>> Where does it say that if I want to build a site I should have to cater
>>> for everyone?

>>
>> But, /now/ you are saying /you/ want the option of "removing choice".

>
> No. He wants the choice for who HE caters to. How is that so hard for
> even a thicky like you to comprehend?
>
>>
>> Is it me that is confused, or you?
>>

>
> It's you. As usual.
>
>>> Why do you want choice but deny it to others?

>>
>> Ah, it is you that is confused.

>
>
> No. He makes perfect sense.
>
>

All the Wintards around here make perfect sense to you Hardon. Then again,
you're a Linux advocate - the principled kind - the non-COLA kind - the too
many distros kind - the attack FOSS kind. Anyway, you get the idea.

Cheers.

--
The world can't afford the rich.

alt.os.linux.ubuntu - where the lunatic Hadron is a "Linux advocate"

Francis (Frank) adds a new "gadget" to his Vista box ...
Download it here: http://tinyurl.com/2hnof6
 
dennis@home wrote:
>
>
> "NoStop" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:fstm380pqf@news4.newsguy.com...
>
>
>> Again Francis, you've missed the point entirely. Market share cannot be
>> determined because it's FREE and can be installed on as many computers as
>> one wants. There is no way to count how many machines Linux is installed
>> on. I have 6 machines here running Linux. Since they don't need to
>> be "activated", how can they possibly be counted? Please tell me how you
>> think they can be counted.

>
> Funny how when linux's share was going up you and alias thought it could
> be measured, but not when its going down.


Considering that it can't be counted, what the FUD meisters report as
"market share" is not relevant to the immense growth that Ubuntu is
experiencing. I can't install them for people who want to get rid of
Vista fast enough. I'm doing two or three a day now. I have yet to have
anyone ask me to remove Ubuntu and install *any* version of Windows.

Alias
 
On Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:20:54 +0200, Josef Moellers wrote:

> Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
>> On Wed, 02 Apr 2008 09:10:53 +0200, Josef Moellers wrote:

>
>>> Even if Linux is in the less-than-1%-area: each and every Linux-user
>>> uses it because of its merits, not because it came bundeled with the
>>> computer they bought or someone forces them to use it. Some people
>>> (including me) even use it *against* pressure from higher places to use
>>> another OS.
>>>
>>> *That's* the difference.

>>
>> Noble, however most people just want to get work done not go on some
>> religious pilgrimage.

>
> BTW I wasn't fishing for compliments, I was trying to say that even
> without a multi-billion advertising campaign, even with the windo
> ocasionally blowing right into our faces, at least one in 163 desktops
> is running Linux!


Linux desktop useage hovers areoun 0.6 percent.
The BBC pegged it at 0.8 percent, which I think is a little high.

After 10+ years and considering Linux is free, that's pathetic.

--
Moshe Goldfarb
Collector of soaps from around the globe.
Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
 
Alias wrote:

> Frank wrote:
>
>> Alias wrote:
>>
>>> Frank wrote:
>>>
>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 01 Apr 2008 10:34:38 +0200, OK wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> APRIL'S FOOL!!!!!!!!!!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Actually, is DECREASED to 0.61%, down from 0.65% in February:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=9&qpcustom=Linux
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The future looks bright :-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Meanwhile, Vista reached 14.05% in a steady linear growth:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=11&qpcustom=Windows+Vista
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Linux seems to be losing no matter where you look.
>>>>>> The ODF vs OOXML debates.
>>>>>> Market Share.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So if you want to be on the losing team, go with Linux.
>>>>>> At least you can say Linux is consistent.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> After 10+ years it still is hovering around 0.6 percent of desktop
>>>>>> market
>>>>>> share.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Um, Linux cannot be sold so it therefore has ZERO market share.
>>>>>
>>>>> Alias
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Translation: not enough users so it's market share cannot be
>>>> determined.
>>>> Frank
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ahem, a market is where things are bought and sold. Linux does
>>> neither and therefore is not part of a market and it cannot possible
>>> have a market share? Too complicated for you, troll?
>>>
>>> Alias

>>
>>
>> Nice fantasy you're having...LOL!
>> You're really stupid!
>> Frank

>
>
> Yep, too complicated for the Frankenmonster. Everyone act surprised.
>
> Alias

You're stupid...and we all know it...LOL!
Frank
 
There you go... doesn't take long for your true colors to come out. someone
offers a simple, random observation of OS usage, taken from real life
statistics, and because they don't jive with your twisted sense of reality,
you turn it to what you think of a slam on religion and family values.

let me enlighten you a little.
Not everyone in Salt Lake is Mormon,
Mormons DO NOT PRACTICE POLYGAMY.
Unfortunately there is as much crime, social problems and racial issues here
as anywhere else.
Utah is apparently not so "inbred" as to attract companies such as Intel,
Novell, Ebay.. just to name a few.
and apparently 99.4% of the population is smart enough not to use Linux.

Clime back under your rock, go play with your feisty fawn, jamin' jeff ,
slippery snake, or whatever idiotic thing their calling the latest distro.

A-hole !

"NoStop" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:fsun4t22uug@news3.newsguy.com...
> KDE wrote:
>
>> hey, I just offered them as a random sample. My website is a booster
>> club
>> site full of pictures and videos for the local High School. It has
>> nothing
>> to do with Computers, Operating Systems or Browsers. The site is written
>> in
>> plain HTML and all the video is flash, No WMP or Quicktime requirements.
>> Were based in Salt Lake, Utah, USA (not Redmond, WA) in fact were 20
>> miles from Novell's headquarters so we should be more Linux biased than
>> anything else.
>>

> For the "local High School". Now isn't that a good sampling! So you're
> based
> in Salt Lake, Utah. Is that the place where extended families have a whole
> other meaning? Kinda inbred dimwits, so to speak?
>
> Cheers.
>
>>
>> "NoStop" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
>> news:fsu0rr01n4i@news1.newsguy.com...
>>> KDE wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ok.. can't count purchases, but what about real world usage.
>>>>
>>>> Webstats off my web page for March 08
>>>>
>>>> Operating System Pageviews %
>>>> 1.Windows 19,265 90.42%
>>>> 2.Apple Macintosh 1,868 8.77%
>>>> 3.Linux 990 .46%
>>>> 4.Other 700 .33%
>>>> 5.Mobile Wap 30 .01%
>>>> Total 21,305 100.00%
>>>>
>>> That means nothing! Who comes to your web page and for what reason? I'm
>>> sure
>>> that if one went and looked at the stats from the Ubuntu forums, Linux
>>> would be around 99%. Because those using Linux would tend to access that
>>> web site. If your web site is all about Windoze, then what do you think
>>> the
>>> stats would look like?
>>>
>>> Let's go to say a more neutral place, like w3schools and look at their
>>> stats ...
>>>
>>> http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_os.asp
>>>
>>> Interesting, aren't they? They certainly don't come close to anything
>>> you
>>> report for your small piece of the web.
>>>
>>> Cheers.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "NoStop" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:fstm380pqf@news4.newsguy.com...
>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>>> Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 01 Apr 2008 10:34:38 +0200, OK wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> APRIL'S FOOL!!!!!!!!!!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Actually, is DECREASED to 0.61%, down from 0.65% in February:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=9&qpcustom=Linux
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The future looks bright :-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Meanwhile, Vista reached 14.05% in a steady linear growth:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>

> http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=11&qpcustom=Windows+Vista
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Linux seems to be losing no matter where you look.
>>>>>>>> The ODF vs OOXML debates.
>>>>>>>> Market Share.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So if you want to be on the losing team, go with Linux.
>>>>>>>> At least you can say Linux is consistent.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> After 10+ years it still is hovering around 0.6 percent of desktop
>>>>>>>> market share.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Um, Linux cannot be sold so it therefore has ZERO market share.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Translation: not enough users so it's market share cannot be
>>>>>> determined.
>>>>>> Frank
>>>>>
>>>>> Again Francis, you've missed the point entirely. Market share cannot
>>>>> be
>>>>> determined because it's FREE and can be installed on as many computers
>>>>> as
>>>>> one wants. There is no way to count how many machines Linux is
>>>>> installed on. I have 6 machines here running Linux. Since they don't
>>>>> need to be "activated", how can they possibly be counted? Please tell
>>>>> me how you think they can be counted.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> A US president declared war on poverty. Poverty won.
>>>>> Another US president declared a war on drugs. Drugs won.
>>>>> This US president declared a war on terror. Terror won.
>>>>> Next?
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> A US president declared war on poverty. Poverty won.
>>> Another US president declared a war on drugs. Drugs won.
>>> This US president declared a war on terror. Terror won.
>>> Next?

>
> --
>
> A US president declared war on poverty. Poverty won.
> Another US president declared a war on drugs. Drugs won.
> This US president declared a war on terror. Terror won.
> Next?
 
Re: Ubuntu ain't worth a CR@P !!!

Alias wrote:

> Apply_Directly_To_Forehead wrote:
>
>> "Alias" <iamalias@nospamgmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:fstmqs$ilp$1@aioe.org...
>>
>>> Frank wrote:
>>>
>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 01 Apr 2008 10:34:38 +0200, OK wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> APRIL'S FOOL!!!!!!!!!!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Actually, is DECREASED to 0.61%, down from 0.65% in February:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=9&qpcustom=Linux
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The future looks bright :-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Meanwhile, Vista reached 14.05% in a steady linear growth:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=11&qpcustom=Windows+Vista
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Linux seems to be losing no matter where you look.
>>>>>> The ODF vs OOXML debates.
>>>>>> Market Share.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So if you want to be on the losing team, go with Linux.
>>>>>> At least you can say Linux is consistent.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> After 10+ years it still is hovering around 0.6 percent of desktop
>>>>>> market
>>>>>> share.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Um, Linux cannot be sold so it therefore has ZERO market share.
>>>>>
>>>>> Alias
>>>>
>>>> Translation: not enough users so it's market share cannot be
>>>> determined.
>>>> Frank
>>>
>>> Ahem, a market is where things are bought and sold. Linux does
>>> neither and therefore is not part of a market and it cannot possible
>>> have a market share? Too complicated for you, troll?
>>>
>>> Alias

>>
>>
>> You are right. Linux/Ubuntu can't have a market share because it's
>> just a blip on the worlds desktops. Nothing to write home about.
>> Will not even make a dent to MS bottom line. They could care less.
>> You keep blowing the Ubuntu horn if it makes you feel better.
>>
>> Ubuntu is just a piece of crap OS that nobody in their right mind
>> would need or want. Geeks play with Ubuntu because they can't get
>> humans to date them.
>>
>> Ubuntu is for losers like Alias and ray and a few other idiots like
>> NoStop and Kevpan the bedpan. Oh yea, Kevpan815 wants to be just like
>> Alias! Another bonus for Ubuntu and Alias !! HA HA HA
>>
>>
>>
>>

>
> No, Windows is for losers like you and Ubuntu is for people who want the
> freedom to use a computer without having to kiss MS' ass and without
> having to worry about viruses and malware.
>
> Alias

You're just a stupid sheep-fukker and a lying linux troll.
Frank
 
Re: Ubuntu ain't worth a CR@P !!!

Bill Yanaire wrote:
> "Alias" <iamalias@nospamgmail.com> wrote in message
> news:ft03ha$m9s$3@aioe.org...
>> No, Windows is for losers like you and Ubuntu is for people who want the
>> freedom to use a computer without having to kiss MS' ass and without
>> having to worry about viruses and malware.
>>
>> Alias

>
> No you have it totally wrong. Ubuntu is for pimply headed teenagers who
> can't get a date and for geeks who want to tinker. To get any real work
> done, you need Windows XP or Vista.


A lie.

>
> Install a good antivirus and watch where you surf and you should be fine.


Yeah, right. New to the Windows computers business?

>
> You can't really do anything with Ubuntu. Look at yourself. All you do each
> and every day is post about Ubuntu. You can't be doing any real work! See
> what I mean?


I get real work done every day so, another lie.

>
> Oh yea, you play a few games on your Windows box.


Actually, I haven't played any games lately as I am too busy installing
Ubuntu for folks who hate Vista and taking care of other work.

Course, it is weird that you think you know what I do with my days but
no one said you aren't weird.

Alias
>
>
>
 
Frank wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>
>> Frank wrote:
>>
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>
>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, 01 Apr 2008 10:34:38 +0200, OK wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> APRIL'S FOOL!!!!!!!!!!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Actually, is DECREASED to 0.61%, down from 0.65% in February:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=9&qpcustom=Linux
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The future looks bright :-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Meanwhile, Vista reached 14.05% in a steady linear growth:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=11&qpcustom=Windows+Vista
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Linux seems to be losing no matter where you look.
>>>>>>> The ODF vs OOXML debates.
>>>>>>> Market Share.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So if you want to be on the losing team, go with Linux.
>>>>>>> At least you can say Linux is consistent.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> After 10+ years it still is hovering around 0.6 percent of
>>>>>>> desktop market
>>>>>>> share.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Um, Linux cannot be sold so it therefore has ZERO market share.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Translation: not enough users so it's market share cannot be
>>>>> determined.
>>>>> Frank
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ahem, a market is where things are bought and sold. Linux does
>>>> neither and therefore is not part of a market and it cannot possible
>>>> have a market share? Too complicated for you, troll?
>>>>
>>>> Alias
>>>
>>>
>>> Nice fantasy you're having...LOL!
>>> You're really stupid!
>>> Frank

>>
>>
>> Yep, too complicated for the Frankenmonster. Everyone act surprised.
>>
>> Alias

> You're stupid...and we all know it...LOL!
> Frank


So, to try and cover up his lack of understanding, the Frankenmonster
hurls another insult. Ho hum, you're so predictable, Frankenmonster.

Alias
 
Re: Ubuntu ain't worth a CR@P !!!

Alias wrote:
> Bill Yanaire wrote:
>
>> "Alias" <iamalias@nospamgmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:ft03ha$m9s$3@aioe.org...
>>
>>> No, Windows is for losers like you and Ubuntu is for people who want
>>> the freedom to use a computer without having to kiss MS' ass and
>>> without having to worry about viruses and malware.
>>>
>>> Alias

>>
>>
>> No you have it totally wrong. Ubuntu is for pimply headed teenagers
>> who can't get a date and for geeks who want to tinker. To get any
>> real work done, you need Windows XP or Vista.

>
>
> A lie.
>
>>The truth. Live with it loser!


>> Install a good antivirus and watch where you surf and you should be fine.

>
>
> Yeah, right. New to the Windows computers business?


No, are you?
>
>>
>> You can't really do anything with Ubuntu. Look at yourself. All you
>> do each and every day is post about Ubuntu. You can't be doing any
>> real work! See what I mean?

>
>
> I get real work done every day so, another lie.


Surfing the web...LOL!
>
>>
>> Oh yea, you play a few games on your Windows box.

>
>
> Actually, I haven't played any games lately as I am too busy installing
> Ubuntu for folks who hate Vista and taking care of other work.


A real lie!!!
>
> Course, it is weird that you think you know what I do with my days but
> no one said you aren't weird.


You're a fukkin lying linux troll, a spammer and a bigoted atheist.
IOW's, a real loser...LOL!
Frank
 
Alias wrote:

> Frank wrote:
>
>> Alias wrote:
>>
>>> Frank wrote:
>>>
>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 01 Apr 2008 10:34:38 +0200, OK wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> APRIL'S FOOL!!!!!!!!!!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Actually, is DECREASED to 0.61%, down from 0.65% in February:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=9&qpcustom=Linux
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The future looks bright :-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Meanwhile, Vista reached 14.05% in a steady linear growth:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=11&qpcustom=Windows+Vista
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Linux seems to be losing no matter where you look.
>>>>>>>> The ODF vs OOXML debates.
>>>>>>>> Market Share.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So if you want to be on the losing team, go with Linux.
>>>>>>>> At least you can say Linux is consistent.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> After 10+ years it still is hovering around 0.6 percent of
>>>>>>>> desktop market
>>>>>>>> share.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Um, Linux cannot be sold so it therefore has ZERO market share.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Translation: not enough users so it's market share cannot be
>>>>>> determined.
>>>>>> Frank
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ahem, a market is where things are bought and sold. Linux does
>>>>> neither and therefore is not part of a market and it cannot
>>>>> possible have a market share? Too complicated for you, troll?
>>>>>
>>>>> Alias
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nice fantasy you're having...LOL!
>>>> You're really stupid!
>>>> Frank
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yep, too complicated for the Frankenmonster. Everyone act surprised.
>>>
>>> Alias

>>
>> You're stupid...and we all know it...LOL!
>> Frank

>
>
> So, to try and cover up his lack of understanding, the Frankenmonster
> hurls another insult. Ho hum, you're so predictable, Frankenmonster.
>
> Alias



You're stupid and we all know it...LOL!
Frank
 
Re: Ubuntu ain't worth a CR@P !!!

Bill Yanaire wrote:

>
> "Alias" <iamalias@nospamgmail.com> wrote in message
> news:ft03ha$m9s$3@aioe.org...
>>
>> No, Windows is for losers like you and Ubuntu is for people who want the
>> freedom to use a computer without having to kiss MS' ass and without
>> having to worry about viruses and malware.
>>
>> Alias

>
> No you have it totally wrong. Ubuntu is for pimply headed teenagers who
> can't get a date and for geeks who want to tinker. To get any real work
> done, you need Windows XP or Vista.
>
> Install a good antivirus and watch where you surf and you should be fine.
>
> You can't really do anything with Ubuntu. Look at yourself. All you do
> each
> and every day is post about Ubuntu. You can't be doing any real work!
> See what I mean?
>

Tell us about the "real work" you get done Mr. Yawn. That's besides playing
Minesweeper.

Cheers.


--

A US president declared war on poverty. Poverty won.
Another US president declared a war on drugs. Drugs won.
This US president declared a war on terror. Terror won.
Next?
 
Re: Ubuntu ain't worth a CR@P !!!

"NoStop" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:ft0c7k12124@news1.newsguy.com...
> Bill Yanaire wrote:
>
>>
>> "Alias" <iamalias@nospamgmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:ft03ha$m9s$3@aioe.org...
>>>
>>> No, Windows is for losers like you and Ubuntu is for people who want the
>>> freedom to use a computer without having to kiss MS' ass and without
>>> having to worry about viruses and malware.
>>>
>>> Alias

>>
>> No you have it totally wrong. Ubuntu is for pimply headed teenagers who
>> can't get a date and for geeks who want to tinker. To get any real work
>> done, you need Windows XP or Vista.
>>
>> Install a good antivirus and watch where you surf and you should be fine.
>>
>> You can't really do anything with Ubuntu. Look at yourself. All you do
>> each
>> and every day is post about Ubuntu. You can't be doing any real work!
>> See what I mean?
>>

> Tell us about the "real work" you get done Mr. Yawn. That's besides
> playing
> Minesweeper.


Which WalMart do you work at?
 
"Alias" <iamalias@nospamgmail.com> wrote in message
news:fstklo$a96$3@aioe.org...
> Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
>> On Tue, 01 Apr 2008 10:34:38 +0200, OK wrote:
>>
>>> APRIL'S FOOL!!!!!!!!!!
>>>
>>> Actually, is DECREASED to 0.61%, down from 0.65% in February:
>>>
>>> http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=9&qpcustom=Linux
>>>
>>> The future looks bright :-)
>>>
>>> Meanwhile, Vista reached 14.05% in a steady linear growth:
>>>
>>> http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=11&qpcustom=Windows+Vista

>>
>> Linux seems to be losing no matter where you look.
>> The ODF vs OOXML debates.
>> Market Share.
>>
>> So if you want to be on the losing team, go with Linux.
>> At least you can say Linux is consistent.
>>
>> After 10+ years it still is hovering around 0.6 percent of desktop market
>> share.
>>

>
> Um, Linux cannot be sold so it therefore has ZERO market share.
>
> Alias


Supper good point. How can they measure it? The stats are flawed. Novell
for example estimates 33 million users.

The figure too of 0.61% must be severely flawed. If 33 million people are
using Linux, and this report says 0.61%, then that means there are
5,409,836,065 PCs out there and we know that isn't true.

MS for example, just passed 100 million sold with their monopoly-bundling
this makes it a good indicator of PCs sold at 100m/year. Say 8 years
average life, that make 800m PCs not 5400m.

These paid for Microsoft numbers are just part of their FUD war on Linux.

Red Hat sales are up nicely too. Quite popular where these pollsters don't
go too.
 
NoStop wrote:
> What? wrote:
>
> What?
>


What do you want from me? I see some posts here today stating that you
are a lier too. I already figured that you are a lying home user.
 
Back
Top