A
Alias
Ubuntu gets 20% faster Internet download speeds compared to XP Pro and
30% faster if compared to the Vista virus.
Alias
30% faster if compared to the Vista virus.
Alias
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
D
dennis@home
"Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message news:fhmlht$dff$1@aioe.org...
> Ubuntu gets 20% faster Internet download speeds compared to XP Pro and 30%
> faster if compared to the Vista virus.
Do you want to state under what circumstances that is or is it just more BS?
BTW I max out my 15M DSL connection on whatever OS I use so it certainly
isn't true for me.
> Ubuntu gets 20% faster Internet download speeds compared to XP Pro and 30%
> faster if compared to the Vista virus.
Do you want to state under what circumstances that is or is it just more BS?
BTW I max out my 15M DSL connection on whatever OS I use so it certainly
isn't true for me.
A
Alias
dennis@home wrote:
>
>
> "Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message
> news:fhmlht$dff$1@aioe.org...
>> Ubuntu gets 20% faster Internet download speeds compared to XP Pro and
>> 30% faster if compared to the Vista virus.
>
> Do you want to state under what circumstances that is or is it just more
> BS?
>
> BTW I max out my 15M DSL connection on whatever OS I use so it certainly
> isn't true for me.
I used the *same* machine that is dual booting XP and Gutsy. I have down
it dozens of times and the results are *always* the same, 20% faster
using Gutsy. I have another machine, dual booting XP and Feisty and it
gets the same results. I posted this on the Ubuntu group and everyone
there also gets the same results.
Alias
>
>
> "Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message
> news:fhmlht$dff$1@aioe.org...
>> Ubuntu gets 20% faster Internet download speeds compared to XP Pro and
>> 30% faster if compared to the Vista virus.
>
> Do you want to state under what circumstances that is or is it just more
> BS?
>
> BTW I max out my 15M DSL connection on whatever OS I use so it certainly
> isn't true for me.
I used the *same* machine that is dual booting XP and Gutsy. I have down
it dozens of times and the results are *always* the same, 20% faster
using Gutsy. I have another machine, dual booting XP and Feisty and it
gets the same results. I posted this on the Ubuntu group and everyone
there also gets the same results.
Alias
D
dennis@home
"Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message news:fhmnep$kp4$1@aioe.org...
> dennis@home wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:fhmlht$dff$1@aioe.org...
>>> Ubuntu gets 20% faster Internet download speeds compared to XP Pro and
>>> 30% faster if compared to the Vista virus.
>>
>> Do you want to state under what circumstances that is or is it just more
>> BS?
>>
>> BTW I max out my 15M DSL connection on whatever OS I use so it certainly
>> isn't true for me.
>
> I used the *same* machine that is dual booting XP and Gutsy. I have down
> it dozens of times and the results are *always* the same, 20% faster using
> Gutsy. I have another machine, dual booting XP and Feisty and it gets the
> same results. I posted this on the Ubuntu group and everyone there also
> gets the same results.
Well if everyone gets the same results I think its safe to put it down as
bull sh!t.
It would be near impossible for two to get the same results, for lots then
it has to be lies.
> dennis@home wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:fhmlht$dff$1@aioe.org...
>>> Ubuntu gets 20% faster Internet download speeds compared to XP Pro and
>>> 30% faster if compared to the Vista virus.
>>
>> Do you want to state under what circumstances that is or is it just more
>> BS?
>>
>> BTW I max out my 15M DSL connection on whatever OS I use so it certainly
>> isn't true for me.
>
> I used the *same* machine that is dual booting XP and Gutsy. I have down
> it dozens of times and the results are *always* the same, 20% faster using
> Gutsy. I have another machine, dual booting XP and Feisty and it gets the
> same results. I posted this on the Ubuntu group and everyone there also
> gets the same results.
Well if everyone gets the same results I think its safe to put it down as
bull sh!t.
It would be near impossible for two to get the same results, for lots then
it has to be lies.
M
Michael Palumbo
"Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message news:fhmnep$kp4$1@aioe.org...
> dennis@home wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:fhmlht$dff$1@aioe.org...
>>> Ubuntu gets 20% faster Internet download speeds compared to XP Pro and
>>> 30% faster if compared to the Vista virus.
>>
>> Do you want to state under what circumstances that is or is it just more
>> BS?
>>
>> BTW I max out my 15M DSL connection on whatever OS I use so it certainly
>> isn't true for me.
>
> I used the *same* machine that is dual booting XP and Gutsy. I have down
> it dozens of times and the results are *always* the same, 20% faster using
> Gutsy. I have another machine, dual booting XP and Feisty and it gets the
> same results. I posted this on the Ubuntu group and everyone there also
> gets the same results.
>
> Alias
Well, count me as one that doesn't get these results.
I'm dual booting Vista and Ubuntu 7.10 and using any speed-test or simply
using my own eyes to watch the average rate I get about 600 KB/s, on either
OS.
Since my cable is a 6 Mb connection that's about what I expect to see.
On my other computer that's only running Gentoo I still see no added speed
for downloads.
You'll also notice that I post to these groups from a Windows machine,
that's because the other computers are for support only, I've tried going
100% Linux in the past and always find myself back in Windows due to the
fact that I just can't get all my work done using any Linux OS, including
Ubuntu, Red Hat, Gentoo (the one I like best) SuZe, and a few others that
I've tried, but that's just me, anyone that likes it, that's great, I'm not
going to try to convert anyone either way.
Use what works for you.
Mic
> dennis@home wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:fhmlht$dff$1@aioe.org...
>>> Ubuntu gets 20% faster Internet download speeds compared to XP Pro and
>>> 30% faster if compared to the Vista virus.
>>
>> Do you want to state under what circumstances that is or is it just more
>> BS?
>>
>> BTW I max out my 15M DSL connection on whatever OS I use so it certainly
>> isn't true for me.
>
> I used the *same* machine that is dual booting XP and Gutsy. I have down
> it dozens of times and the results are *always* the same, 20% faster using
> Gutsy. I have another machine, dual booting XP and Feisty and it gets the
> same results. I posted this on the Ubuntu group and everyone there also
> gets the same results.
>
> Alias
Well, count me as one that doesn't get these results.
I'm dual booting Vista and Ubuntu 7.10 and using any speed-test or simply
using my own eyes to watch the average rate I get about 600 KB/s, on either
OS.
Since my cable is a 6 Mb connection that's about what I expect to see.
On my other computer that's only running Gentoo I still see no added speed
for downloads.
You'll also notice that I post to these groups from a Windows machine,
that's because the other computers are for support only, I've tried going
100% Linux in the past and always find myself back in Windows due to the
fact that I just can't get all my work done using any Linux OS, including
Ubuntu, Red Hat, Gentoo (the one I like best) SuZe, and a few others that
I've tried, but that's just me, anyone that likes it, that's great, I'm not
going to try to convert anyone either way.
Use what works for you.
Mic
A
Alias
dennis@home wrote:
>
>
> "Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message
> news:fhmnep$kp4$1@aioe.org...
>> dennis@home wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> "Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:fhmlht$dff$1@aioe.org...
>>>> Ubuntu gets 20% faster Internet download speeds compared to XP Pro
>>>> and 30% faster if compared to the Vista virus.
>>>
>>> Do you want to state under what circumstances that is or is it just
>>> more BS?
>>>
>>> BTW I max out my 15M DSL connection on whatever OS I use so it
>>> certainly isn't true for me.
>>
>> I used the *same* machine that is dual booting XP and Gutsy. I have
>> down it dozens of times and the results are *always* the same, 20%
>> faster using Gutsy. I have another machine, dual booting XP and Feisty
>> and it gets the same results. I posted this on the Ubuntu group and
>> everyone there also gets the same results.
>
> Well if everyone gets the same results I think its safe to put it down
> as bull sh!t.
> It would be near impossible for two to get the same results, for lots
> then it has to be lies.
Well, not "exact" results but similar results. Whether you believe me or
not is not relevant as you never believe anything I say. When I posted
from Ubuntu, you accused me of modifying my headers which, of course, I
didn't do.
In short, bugger off.
Alias
>
>
> "Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message
> news:fhmnep$kp4$1@aioe.org...
>> dennis@home wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> "Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:fhmlht$dff$1@aioe.org...
>>>> Ubuntu gets 20% faster Internet download speeds compared to XP Pro
>>>> and 30% faster if compared to the Vista virus.
>>>
>>> Do you want to state under what circumstances that is or is it just
>>> more BS?
>>>
>>> BTW I max out my 15M DSL connection on whatever OS I use so it
>>> certainly isn't true for me.
>>
>> I used the *same* machine that is dual booting XP and Gutsy. I have
>> down it dozens of times and the results are *always* the same, 20%
>> faster using Gutsy. I have another machine, dual booting XP and Feisty
>> and it gets the same results. I posted this on the Ubuntu group and
>> everyone there also gets the same results.
>
> Well if everyone gets the same results I think its safe to put it down
> as bull sh!t.
> It would be near impossible for two to get the same results, for lots
> then it has to be lies.
Well, not "exact" results but similar results. Whether you believe me or
not is not relevant as you never believe anything I say. When I posted
from Ubuntu, you accused me of modifying my headers which, of course, I
didn't do.
In short, bugger off.
Alias
A
Alias
Michael Palumbo wrote:
>
>
> "Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message
> news:fhmnep$kp4$1@aioe.org...
>> dennis@home wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> "Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:fhmlht$dff$1@aioe.org...
>>>> Ubuntu gets 20% faster Internet download speeds compared to XP Pro
>>>> and 30% faster if compared to the Vista virus.
>>>
>>> Do you want to state under what circumstances that is or is it just
>>> more BS?
>>>
>>> BTW I max out my 15M DSL connection on whatever OS I use so it
>>> certainly isn't true for me.
>>
>> I used the *same* machine that is dual booting XP and Gutsy. I have
>> down it dozens of times and the results are *always* the same, 20%
>> faster using Gutsy. I have another machine, dual booting XP and Feisty
>> and it gets the same results. I posted this on the Ubuntu group and
>> everyone there also gets the same results.
>>
>> Alias
>
> Well, count me as one that doesn't get these results.
>
> I'm dual booting Vista and Ubuntu 7.10 and using any speed-test or
> simply using my own eyes to watch the average rate I get about 600 KB/s,
> on either OS.
>
> Since my cable is a 6 Mb connection that's about what I expect to see.
>
> On my other computer that's only running Gentoo I still see no added
> speed for downloads.
>
> Mic
I haven't tried it with Vista vs. Ubuntu, just XP.
Alias
>
>
> "Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message
> news:fhmnep$kp4$1@aioe.org...
>> dennis@home wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> "Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:fhmlht$dff$1@aioe.org...
>>>> Ubuntu gets 20% faster Internet download speeds compared to XP Pro
>>>> and 30% faster if compared to the Vista virus.
>>>
>>> Do you want to state under what circumstances that is or is it just
>>> more BS?
>>>
>>> BTW I max out my 15M DSL connection on whatever OS I use so it
>>> certainly isn't true for me.
>>
>> I used the *same* machine that is dual booting XP and Gutsy. I have
>> down it dozens of times and the results are *always* the same, 20%
>> faster using Gutsy. I have another machine, dual booting XP and Feisty
>> and it gets the same results. I posted this on the Ubuntu group and
>> everyone there also gets the same results.
>>
>> Alias
>
> Well, count me as one that doesn't get these results.
>
> I'm dual booting Vista and Ubuntu 7.10 and using any speed-test or
> simply using my own eyes to watch the average rate I get about 600 KB/s,
> on either OS.
>
> Since my cable is a 6 Mb connection that's about what I expect to see.
>
> On my other computer that's only running Gentoo I still see no added
> speed for downloads.
>
> Mic
I haven't tried it with Vista vs. Ubuntu, just XP.
Alias
K
kevpan158@nospam.msn.com
There Is A Disadvantage with Ubuntu Over XP And Possibily Vista - Just FYI
Using Ubuntu Is Like Going Back 5 Years. Most Of My Programs Run On
Windows. I Don't Like The Idea Of Having To Type In Commands. Ubuntu Is A
Joke. Just FYI.
I Like XP Better Than Vista RTM. Just FYI
"Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message news:fhmlht$dff$1@aioe.org...
> Ubuntu gets 20% faster Internet download speeds compared to XP Pro and 30%
> faster if compared to the Vista virus.
>
> Alias
Using Ubuntu Is Like Going Back 5 Years. Most Of My Programs Run On
Windows. I Don't Like The Idea Of Having To Type In Commands. Ubuntu Is A
Joke. Just FYI.
I Like XP Better Than Vista RTM. Just FYI
"Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message news:fhmlht$dff$1@aioe.org...
> Ubuntu gets 20% faster Internet download speeds compared to XP Pro and 30%
> faster if compared to the Vista virus.
>
> Alias
F
Frank
Alias wrote:
> Ubuntu gets 20% faster Internet download speeds compared to XP Pro and
> 30% faster if compared to the Vista virus.
>
> Alias
Yeah right!
More anecdotal lies form our resident liar.
Frank
> Ubuntu gets 20% faster Internet download speeds compared to XP Pro and
> 30% faster if compared to the Vista virus.
>
> Alias
Yeah right!
More anecdotal lies form our resident liar.
Frank
A
Alias
Frank wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>> Ubuntu gets 20% faster Internet download speeds compared to XP Pro and
>> 30% faster if compared to the Vista virus.
>>
>> Alias
>
> Yeah right!
> More anecdotal lies form our resident liar.
> Frank
Yep, it's true. Course, being as you are too dense to be able to install
Ubuntu, you'll never be able to test it and prove me wrong.
Oh, and you're the biggest liar this newsgroup has ever known, Frankie boy.
Alias
> Alias wrote:
>> Ubuntu gets 20% faster Internet download speeds compared to XP Pro and
>> 30% faster if compared to the Vista virus.
>>
>> Alias
>
> Yeah right!
> More anecdotal lies form our resident liar.
> Frank
Yep, it's true. Course, being as you are too dense to be able to install
Ubuntu, you'll never be able to test it and prove me wrong.
Oh, and you're the biggest liar this newsgroup has ever known, Frankie boy.
Alias
J
john
"Frank" <fb@osspan.clm> wrote in message
news:uJX%23v4TKIHA.1324@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> Alias wrote:
>> Ubuntu gets 20% faster Internet download speeds compared to XP Pro and
>> 30% faster if compared to the Vista virus.
>>
>> Alias
>
> Yeah right!
> More anecdotal lies form our resident liar.
> Frank
>
looks like Frank got a dictionary for his birthday...
ROFL
news:uJX%23v4TKIHA.1324@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> Alias wrote:
>> Ubuntu gets 20% faster Internet download speeds compared to XP Pro and
>> 30% faster if compared to the Vista virus.
>>
>> Alias
>
> Yeah right!
> More anecdotal lies form our resident liar.
> Frank
>
looks like Frank got a dictionary for his birthday...
ROFL
F
Frank
Alias wrote:
> Frank wrote:
>
>> Alias wrote:
>>
>>> Ubuntu gets 20% faster Internet download speeds compared to XP Pro
>>> and 30% faster if compared to the Vista virus.
>>>
>>> Alias
>>
>>
>> Yeah right!
>> More anecdotal lies form our resident liar.
>> Frank
>
>
> Yep, it's true. Course, being as you are too dense to be able to install
> Ubuntu, you'll never be able to test it and prove me wrong.
>
> Oh, and you're the biggest liar this newsgroup has ever known, Frankie boy.
>
> Alias
Nice try liar. Now provide factual evidence that what you've said is
true or else STFU you lying linux lovin troll.
Frank
> Frank wrote:
>
>> Alias wrote:
>>
>>> Ubuntu gets 20% faster Internet download speeds compared to XP Pro
>>> and 30% faster if compared to the Vista virus.
>>>
>>> Alias
>>
>>
>> Yeah right!
>> More anecdotal lies form our resident liar.
>> Frank
>
>
> Yep, it's true. Course, being as you are too dense to be able to install
> Ubuntu, you'll never be able to test it and prove me wrong.
>
> Oh, and you're the biggest liar this newsgroup has ever known, Frankie boy.
>
> Alias
Nice try liar. Now provide factual evidence that what you've said is
true or else STFU you lying linux lovin troll.
Frank
A
Alias
Frank wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>> Frank wrote:
>>
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ubuntu gets 20% faster Internet download speeds compared to XP Pro
>>>> and 30% faster if compared to the Vista virus.
>>>>
>>>> Alias
>>>
>>>
>>> Yeah right!
>>> More anecdotal lies form our resident liar.
>>> Frank
>>
>>
>> Yep, it's true. Course, being as you are too dense to be able to
>> install Ubuntu, you'll never be able to test it and prove me wrong.
>>
>> Oh, and you're the biggest liar this newsgroup has ever known, Frankie
>> boy.
>>
>> Alias
>
> Nice try liar. Now provide factual evidence that what you've said is
> true or else STFU you lying linux lovin troll.
> Frank
No need to prove anything to you because you're just a lying troll who
can only resorts to insults when someone disagrees with you.
Alias
> Alias wrote:
>> Frank wrote:
>>
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ubuntu gets 20% faster Internet download speeds compared to XP Pro
>>>> and 30% faster if compared to the Vista virus.
>>>>
>>>> Alias
>>>
>>>
>>> Yeah right!
>>> More anecdotal lies form our resident liar.
>>> Frank
>>
>>
>> Yep, it's true. Course, being as you are too dense to be able to
>> install Ubuntu, you'll never be able to test it and prove me wrong.
>>
>> Oh, and you're the biggest liar this newsgroup has ever known, Frankie
>> boy.
>>
>> Alias
>
> Nice try liar. Now provide factual evidence that what you've said is
> true or else STFU you lying linux lovin troll.
> Frank
No need to prove anything to you because you're just a lying troll who
can only resorts to insults when someone disagrees with you.
Alias
F
Frank
Alias wrote:
> Frank wrote:
>
>> Alias wrote:
>>
>>> Frank wrote:
>>>
>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ubuntu gets 20% faster Internet download speeds compared to XP Pro
>>>>> and 30% faster if compared to the Vista virus.
>>>>>
>>>>> Alias
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yeah right!
>>>> More anecdotal lies form our resident liar.
>>>> Frank
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yep, it's true. Course, being as you are too dense to be able to
>>> install Ubuntu, you'll never be able to test it and prove me wrong.
>>>
>>> Oh, and you're the biggest liar this newsgroup has ever known,
>>> Frankie boy.
>>>
>>> Alias
>>
>>
>> Nice try liar. Now provide factual evidence that what you've said is
>> true or else STFU you lying linux lovin troll.
>> Frank
>
>
> No need to prove anything to you because you're just a lying troll who
> can only resorts to insults when someone disagrees with you.
>
> Alias
Ahahaha...so we've just caught you in another one of your endless,
incessant lies haven't we...lol!
Get lost you fukkin troll!
Frank
> Frank wrote:
>
>> Alias wrote:
>>
>>> Frank wrote:
>>>
>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ubuntu gets 20% faster Internet download speeds compared to XP Pro
>>>>> and 30% faster if compared to the Vista virus.
>>>>>
>>>>> Alias
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yeah right!
>>>> More anecdotal lies form our resident liar.
>>>> Frank
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yep, it's true. Course, being as you are too dense to be able to
>>> install Ubuntu, you'll never be able to test it and prove me wrong.
>>>
>>> Oh, and you're the biggest liar this newsgroup has ever known,
>>> Frankie boy.
>>>
>>> Alias
>>
>>
>> Nice try liar. Now provide factual evidence that what you've said is
>> true or else STFU you lying linux lovin troll.
>> Frank
>
>
> No need to prove anything to you because you're just a lying troll who
> can only resorts to insults when someone disagrees with you.
>
> Alias
Ahahaha...so we've just caught you in another one of your endless,
incessant lies haven't we...lol!
Get lost you fukkin troll!
Frank
M
Mrs. Alias
Now Honey, don't go spreading Lies
Son,
This is your Mother. I am sick and tired of you coming to this news group
and spreading lies about Ubuntu. Dad and I know you are obsessed with
Ubuntu. You won't even go outside and play with the neighborhood kids any
more. What are we to do?
Yes, I know you are in your late 50's, but you are still our kid. Honey,
save up some money and buy a car. Get out and stay away from the computer.
Love Mom
"Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message news:fhmlht$dff$1@aioe.org...
> Ubuntu gets 20% faster Internet download speeds compared to XP Pro and 30%
> faster if compared to the Vista virus.
>
> Alias
Son,
This is your Mother. I am sick and tired of you coming to this news group
and spreading lies about Ubuntu. Dad and I know you are obsessed with
Ubuntu. You won't even go outside and play with the neighborhood kids any
more. What are we to do?
Yes, I know you are in your late 50's, but you are still our kid. Honey,
save up some money and buy a car. Get out and stay away from the computer.
Love Mom
"Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message news:fhmlht$dff$1@aioe.org...
> Ubuntu gets 20% faster Internet download speeds compared to XP Pro and 30%
> faster if compared to the Vista virus.
>
> Alias
D
dennis@home
"Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message
news:OGZk0jTKIHA.4228@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> dennis@home wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:fhmnep$kp4$1@aioe.org...
>>> dennis@home wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:fhmlht$dff$1@aioe.org...
>>>>> Ubuntu gets 20% faster Internet download speeds compared to XP Pro and
>>>>> 30% faster if compared to the Vista virus.
>>>>
>>>> Do you want to state under what circumstances that is or is it just
>>>> more BS?
>>>>
>>>> BTW I max out my 15M DSL connection on whatever OS I use so it
>>>> certainly isn't true for me.
>>>
>>> I used the *same* machine that is dual booting XP and Gutsy. I have down
>>> it dozens of times and the results are *always* the same, 20% faster
>>> using Gutsy. I have another machine, dual booting XP and Feisty and it
>>> gets the same results. I posted this on the Ubuntu group and everyone
>>> there also gets the same results.
>>
>> Well if everyone gets the same results I think its safe to put it down as
>> bull sh!t.
>> It would be near impossible for two to get the same results, for lots
>> then it has to be lies.
>
> Well, not "exact" results but similar results. Whether you believe me or
> not is not relevant as you never believe anything I say.
Well you do post cr@p that isn't true.
Take what you said above.. for it to be true you would have to have
blazingly fast broadband for the OS to make any difference.
I am not talking about 10M or 20M broadband but probably 40-50M.
Anything less and its the broadband speed you are measuring and it doesn't
vary with OS.
news:OGZk0jTKIHA.4228@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> dennis@home wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:fhmnep$kp4$1@aioe.org...
>>> dennis@home wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:fhmlht$dff$1@aioe.org...
>>>>> Ubuntu gets 20% faster Internet download speeds compared to XP Pro and
>>>>> 30% faster if compared to the Vista virus.
>>>>
>>>> Do you want to state under what circumstances that is or is it just
>>>> more BS?
>>>>
>>>> BTW I max out my 15M DSL connection on whatever OS I use so it
>>>> certainly isn't true for me.
>>>
>>> I used the *same* machine that is dual booting XP and Gutsy. I have down
>>> it dozens of times and the results are *always* the same, 20% faster
>>> using Gutsy. I have another machine, dual booting XP and Feisty and it
>>> gets the same results. I posted this on the Ubuntu group and everyone
>>> there also gets the same results.
>>
>> Well if everyone gets the same results I think its safe to put it down as
>> bull sh!t.
>> It would be near impossible for two to get the same results, for lots
>> then it has to be lies.
>
> Well, not "exact" results but similar results. Whether you believe me or
> not is not relevant as you never believe anything I say.
Well you do post cr@p that isn't true.
Take what you said above.. for it to be true you would have to have
blazingly fast broadband for the OS to make any difference.
I am not talking about 10M or 20M broadband but probably 40-50M.
Anything less and its the broadband speed you are measuring and it doesn't
vary with OS.
A
Alias
Re: Now Honey, don't go spreading Lies
Mrs. Alias wrote:
> Son,
>
> This is your Mother. I am sick and tired of you coming to this news group
> and spreading lies about Ubuntu. Dad and I know you are obsessed with
> Ubuntu. You won't even go outside and play with the neighborhood kids any
> more. What are we to do?
>
> Yes, I know you are in your late 50's, but you are still our kid. Honey,
> save up some money and buy a car. Get out and stay away from the computer.
>
> Love Mom
>
> "Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message news:fhmlht$dff$1@aioe.org...
>> Ubuntu gets 20% faster Internet download speeds compared to XP Pro and 30%
>> faster if compared to the Vista virus.
>>
>> Alias
>
>
My mother is deceased. Got any more jokes?
Alias
Mrs. Alias wrote:
> Son,
>
> This is your Mother. I am sick and tired of you coming to this news group
> and spreading lies about Ubuntu. Dad and I know you are obsessed with
> Ubuntu. You won't even go outside and play with the neighborhood kids any
> more. What are we to do?
>
> Yes, I know you are in your late 50's, but you are still our kid. Honey,
> save up some money and buy a car. Get out and stay away from the computer.
>
> Love Mom
>
> "Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message news:fhmlht$dff$1@aioe.org...
>> Ubuntu gets 20% faster Internet download speeds compared to XP Pro and 30%
>> faster if compared to the Vista virus.
>>
>> Alias
>
>
My mother is deceased. Got any more jokes?
Alias
A
Adam Albright
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 09:20:43 -0800, Frank <fb@osspan.clm> wrote:
>Alias wrote:
>> Ubuntu gets 20% faster Internet download speeds compared to XP Pro and
>> 30% faster if compared to the Vista virus.
>>
>> Alias
>
>Yeah right!
>More anecdotal lies form our resident liar.
>Frank
You're the resident dickhead.
>Alias wrote:
>> Ubuntu gets 20% faster Internet download speeds compared to XP Pro and
>> 30% faster if compared to the Vista virus.
>>
>> Alias
>
>Yeah right!
>More anecdotal lies form our resident liar.
>Frank
You're the resident dickhead.
C
ceed
dennis@home wrote:
|
|
|"Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message
|news:OGZk0jTKIHA.4228@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
||dennis@home wrote:
|||
|||
|||"Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message
|||news:fhmnep$kp4$1@aioe.org...
||||dennis@home wrote:
|||||
|||||
|||||"Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message
|||||news:fhmlht$dff$1@aioe.org...
||||||Ubuntu gets 20% faster Internet download speeds compared to
||||||XP Pro and 30% faster if compared to the Vista virus.
|||||
|||||Do you want to state under what circumstances that is or is
|||||it just more BS?
|||||
|||||BTW I max out my 15M DSL connection on whatever OS I use so
|||||it certainly isn't true for me.
||||
||||I used the same machine that is dual booting XP and Gutsy. I
||||have down it dozens of times and the results are always the
||||same, 20% faster using Gutsy. I have another machine, dual
||||booting XP and Feisty and it gets the same results. I posted
||||this on the Ubuntu group and everyone there also gets the same
||||results.
|||
|||Well if everyone gets the same results I think its safe to put it
|||down as bull sh!t. It would be near impossible for two to get
|||the same results, for lots then it has to be lies.
||
||Well, not "exact" results but similar results. Whether you believe
||me or not is not relevant as you never believe anything I say.
|
|Well you do post cr@p that isn't true.
|Take what you said above.. for it to be true you would have to have
|blazingly fast broadband for the OS to make any difference. I am not
|talking about 10M or 20M broadband but probably 40-50M. Anything
|less and its the broadband speed you are measuring and it doesn't
|vary with OS.
Actually, it could have to do with the driver for the network
interface. Sometimes the Linux driver works better with a certain card
than the Windows version. For other cards it's the other way around.
--
//ceed
|
|
|"Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message
|news:OGZk0jTKIHA.4228@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
||dennis@home wrote:
|||
|||
|||"Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message
|||news:fhmnep$kp4$1@aioe.org...
||||dennis@home wrote:
|||||
|||||
|||||"Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message
|||||news:fhmlht$dff$1@aioe.org...
||||||Ubuntu gets 20% faster Internet download speeds compared to
||||||XP Pro and 30% faster if compared to the Vista virus.
|||||
|||||Do you want to state under what circumstances that is or is
|||||it just more BS?
|||||
|||||BTW I max out my 15M DSL connection on whatever OS I use so
|||||it certainly isn't true for me.
||||
||||I used the same machine that is dual booting XP and Gutsy. I
||||have down it dozens of times and the results are always the
||||same, 20% faster using Gutsy. I have another machine, dual
||||booting XP and Feisty and it gets the same results. I posted
||||this on the Ubuntu group and everyone there also gets the same
||||results.
|||
|||Well if everyone gets the same results I think its safe to put it
|||down as bull sh!t. It would be near impossible for two to get
|||the same results, for lots then it has to be lies.
||
||Well, not "exact" results but similar results. Whether you believe
||me or not is not relevant as you never believe anything I say.
|
|Well you do post cr@p that isn't true.
|Take what you said above.. for it to be true you would have to have
|blazingly fast broadband for the OS to make any difference. I am not
|talking about 10M or 20M broadband but probably 40-50M. Anything
|less and its the broadband speed you are measuring and it doesn't
|vary with OS.
Actually, it could have to do with the driver for the network
interface. Sometimes the Linux driver works better with a certain card
than the Windows version. For other cards it's the other way around.
--
//ceed
C
ceed
Re: There Is A Disadvantage with Ubuntu Over XP And Possibily Vista - Just FYI
<kevpan158@nospam.msn.com> wrote:
|Using Ubuntu Is Like Going Back 5 Years. Most Of My Programs Run On
|Windows. I Don't Like The Idea Of Having To Type In Commands.
|Ubuntu Is A Joke. Just FYI.
|
|I Like XP Better Than Vista RTM. Just FYI
|
|"Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message
|news:fhmlht$dff$1@aioe.org...
||Ubuntu gets 20% faster Internet download speeds compared to XP Pro
||and 30% faster if compared to the Vista virus.
||
||Alias
Type in commands? Have you actually tried Ubuntu? It has a modern
desktop interface which works very much like Windows. I am using Vista
right now and I'm quite pleased with it. I have Ubuntu also on here. It
does not feel like going 5 years back. However, it is different, but
still good.
One does not exclude the other. Use what works for you and do not try
to justify your preference by ragging on something a lot of people use
and like.
--
//ceed
<kevpan158@nospam.msn.com> wrote:
|Using Ubuntu Is Like Going Back 5 Years. Most Of My Programs Run On
|Windows. I Don't Like The Idea Of Having To Type In Commands.
|Ubuntu Is A Joke. Just FYI.
|
|I Like XP Better Than Vista RTM. Just FYI
|
|"Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message
|news:fhmlht$dff$1@aioe.org...
||Ubuntu gets 20% faster Internet download speeds compared to XP Pro
||and 30% faster if compared to the Vista virus.
||
||Alias
Type in commands? Have you actually tried Ubuntu? It has a modern
desktop interface which works very much like Windows. I am using Vista
right now and I'm quite pleased with it. I have Ubuntu also on here. It
does not feel like going 5 years back. However, it is different, but
still good.
One does not exclude the other. Use what works for you and do not try
to justify your preference by ragging on something a lot of people use
and like.
--
//ceed
Similar threads
P
- Replies
- 0
- Views
- 23
P
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.