Vista Wins Again !

  • Thread starter Thread starter cheley_bonstell88@live.com
  • Start date Start date
It's a sure bet that your a MORON.

m


"Canuck57" <dave-no_spam@unixhome.net> wrote in message
news:90l2k.10943$C12.4136@pd7urf3no...

> "Bill Sharpe"


>> Big_Al wrote:
>>
>>> Sure they do, its a different 3 million.
>>> 3 mill love it, 3 mill hate it.
>>> There's probably 3 million who don't give a damn.

>>
>> Considering the population of the planet is in the billions, there's no
>> doubt there's many more than 3 million who don't give a damn about Vista.
>>
>> I know, I know, not all of those billions post an opinion on the web...
>>
>> Bill


> Probably safer bet to say 3 billion. Most people can't afford the OS.
 
hey moron just because I make fun of you in every single post I post, doesnt
mean you own me... It means that you are so incredibly stupid that I love
kicking your ars


"Frank" <fb@tpi.olm> wrote in message
news:4849a740$0$31723$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
> Clear Windows wrote:
>
> --------------------------------------
>
> hehehe...I own you!...LOL!
> Frank
 
vishhiita prime wrote:

> hey moron just because I make fun of you in every single post I post, doesnt
> mean you own me... It means that you are so incredibly stupid that I love
> kicking your ars
>
>
> "Frank" <fb@tpi.olm> wrote in message
> news:4849a740$0$31723$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
>
>>Clear Windows wrote:
>>
>>--------------------------------------
>>
>>hehehe...I own you!...LOL!
>>Frank

>
>
>

Hahahahaha...hehehehehe...LOL!
Frank
 
Quote facts not your emotional garbage.
"Canuck57" <dave-no_spam@unixhome.net> wrote in message
news:90l2k.10943$C12.4136@pd7urf3no...
>
> "Bill Sharpe" <wfsnopam@adelphia.net> wrote in message
> news:uVv0MaCyIHA.1768@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>> Big_Al wrote:
>>
>>> Sure they do, its a different 3 million.
>>> 3 mill love it, 3 mill hate it.
>>> There's probably 3 million who don't give a damn.

>>
>> Considering the population of the planet is in the billions, there's no
>> doubt there's many more than 3 million who don't give a damn about Vista.
>>
>> I know, I know, not all of those billions post an opinion on the web...
>>
>> Bill

>
> Probably safer bet to say 3 billion. Most people can't afford the OS.
>
 
On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 11:13:32 -0500, "Unknown" <unknown@unknown.kom>
wrote:

>> Probably safer bet to say 3 billion. Most people can't afford the OS.


Another common but typically dumb comment. Most people don't buy Vista
outright. It comes preinstalled on the computer they buy.

I see you felt your comment was so witty that is deserved to be cross
posted to several newsgroups. Wow, I'm impressed. Not!
 
Who?
"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message
news:64kl44lmlhj9jio5tc6p4bkdllittdf5gr@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 11:13:32 -0500, "Unknown" <unknown@unknown.kom>
> wrote:
>
>>> Probably safer bet to say 3 billion. Most people can't afford the OS.

>
> Another common but typically dumb comment. Most people don't buy Vista
> outright. It comes preinstalled on the computer they buy.
>
> I see you felt your comment was so witty that is deserved to be cross
> posted to several newsgroups. Wow, I'm impressed. Not!
>
 
"barnegatdx" <barnegatdx@aol.com> wrote in message

> On Jun 6, 11:12 pm, "David Morgan \(MAMS\)" <fin...@m-a-m-s.comC/Odm>


> > <cheley_bonstel...@live.com> wrote in message...


> > > Comments?


> > No one cares what a Ubuntu is.


> OK..
>
> Ubuntu Has over 8 Million users Worldwide
>
> http://robitaille.wordpress.com/2006/12/30/ubuntu-now-has-over-8-millions-users/



Great !! That mean Dallas, Houston, Amarillo and Albuquerque comprise all
of the world's Unbuntoo loosers.... er... users. Sorry, Not impressive. My
requested "comment" still stands.
 
On 7 Jun 2008 20:16:01 -0500, Plato <|@|.|> wrote:

>barnegatdx wrote:
>>
>> > No one cares what a Ubuntu is.

>>
>> Ubuntu Has over 8 Million users Worldwide
>>
>> http://rosbaitasille.worddprsess.com/23006/12/30/ubuntu-now-has-over-8-millions-users/

>
>There is NO way to tell how many people are using Ubuntu.


No more than there is any accurate way to know how many users are
actually happy with Vista.

Here's a radical thought, if somebody is happy with Ubuntu, great. If
somebody else is happy with Vista that's great too.

The purpose of this newsgroup is to help people having issues with
Vista. The fanboy gang doesn't even like it mentioned that Vista could
possibly have issues. They just want everybody to blindly praise
Microsoft being the brainless toads they are.

I find such stupidity entertaining in watching to what extremes these
bozos will go. They lie, they yell, they scream obscenities and in the
end it changes nothing. Like I said it does have some minimal
entertainment value to watch them go ape.
 
David Morgan (MAMS) wrote:
> "barnegatdx" <barnegatdx@aol.com> wrote in message
>
>> On Jun 6, 11:12 pm, "David Morgan \(MAMS\)" <fin...@m-a-m-s.comC/Odm>

>
>>> <cheley_bonstel...@live.com> wrote in message...

>
>>>> Comments?

>
>>> No one cares what a Ubuntu is.

>
>> OK..
>>
>> Ubuntu Has over 8 Million users Worldwide
>>
>> http://robitaille.wordpress.com/2006/12/30/ubuntu-now-has-over-8-millions-users/

>
>
> Great !! That mean Dallas, Houston, Amarillo and Albuquerque comprise all
> of the world's Unbuntoo loosers.... er... users. Sorry, Not impressive. My
> requested "comment" still stands.



Um, it's spelled "losers". Now, what do Linux users lose? They lose
worrying about viruses and malware. They lose worrying about WPA, WGA
and DRM. They lose the BSOD experience. They lose having to get updates
all over the place. They also lose having to pay for an operating
system, Office, Photoshop and other programs. Yeah, Linux users are
losers, all right, but in this case losing is a very good thing.

A little English class for you:

Lose is the opposite of win.
Loose is the opposite of tight.

Alias
 
On Jun 8, 7:04 am, Alias <iamal...@NOSPAMPLEASEgmail.com> wrote:
> David Morgan (MAMS) wrote:
> > "barnegatdx" <barnega...@aol.com> wrote in message

>
> >> On Jun 6, 11:12 pm, "David Morgan \(MAMS\)" <fin...@m-a-m-s.comC/Odm>

>
> >>> <cheley_bonstel...@live.com> wrote in message...

>
> >>>> Comments?

>
> >>> No one cares what a Ubuntu is.

>
> >> OK..

>
> >> Ubuntu Has over 8 Million users Worldwide

>
> >>http://robitaille.wordpress.com/2006/12/30/ubuntu-now-has-over-8-mill...

>
> > Great !!    That mean Dallas, Houston, Amarillo and Albuquerque comprise all
> > of the world's Unbuntoo loosers.... er... users.    Sorry, Not impressive.  My
> > requested "comment" still stands.

>
> Um, it's spelled "losers". Now, what do Linux users lose? They lose
> worrying about viruses and malware. They lose worrying about WPA, WGA
> and DRM. They lose the BSOD experience. They lose having to get updates
> all over the place. They also lose having to pay for an operating
> system, Office, Photoshop and other programs. Yeah, Linux users are
> losers, all right, but in this case losing is a very good thing.
>
> A little English class for you:
>
> Lose is the opposite of win.
> Loose is the opposite of tight.
>
> Alias


I have used GIMP on the Ubuntu side of my PC

to rescue photographs from an old CD that were impossible to get at on
the Microsoft side.

I have found the Ubuntu utilities more compatible with streaming audio
than the ones on the Microsoft side.

( especially Microsofts Media Player)

Ubuntu is Free. you can optimize your hard drive, download Ubuntu and
let it install itself.

http://www.ubuntu.com/

Not a problem.

When Windows finally Dumps XP for some Slow, Ponderous Bug ridden
excuse for an OS, I'm giving up on it and using Ubuntu / Open source
Software.

Hali Richard Stallman !

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Stallman
 
cheley_bonstell88@live.com wrote:

> On Jun 8, 7:04 am, Alias <iamal...@NOSPAMPLEASEgmail.com> wrote:
>
>>David Morgan (MAMS) wrote:
>>
>>>"barnegatdx" <barnega...@aol.com> wrote in message

>>
>>>>On Jun 6, 11:12 pm, "David Morgan \(MAMS\)" <fin...@m-a-m-s.comC/Odm>

>>
>>>>><cheley_bonstel...@live.com> wrote in message...

>>
>>>>>>Comments?

>>
>>>>>No one cares what a Ubuntu is.

>>
>>>>OK..

>>
>>>>Ubuntu Has over 8 Million users Worldwide

>>
>>>>http://robitaille.wordpress.com/2006/12/30/ubuntu-now-has-over-8-mill...

>>
>>>Great !! That mean Dallas, Houston, Amarillo and Albuquerque comprise all
>>>of the world's Unbuntoo loosers.... er... users. Sorry, Not impressive. My
>>>requested "comment" still stands.

>>
>>Um, it's spelled "losers". Now, what do Linux users lose? They lose
>>worrying about viruses and malware. They lose worrying about WPA, WGA
>>and DRM. They lose the BSOD experience. They lose having to get updates
>>all over the place. They also lose having to pay for an operating
>>system, Office, Photoshop and other programs. Yeah, Linux users are
>>losers, all right, but in this case losing is a very good thing.
>>
>>A little English class for you:
>>
>>Lose is the opposite of win.
>>Loose is the opposite of tight.
>>
>>Alias

>
>
> I have used GIMP on the Ubuntu side of my PC
>
> to rescue photographs from an old CD that were impossible to get at on
> the Microsoft side.
>
> I have found the Ubuntu utilities more compatible with streaming audio
> than the ones on the Microsoft side.
>
> ( especially Microsofts Media Player)
>
> Ubuntu is Free. you can optimize your hard drive, download Ubuntu and
> let it install itself.
>
> http://www.ubuntu.com/
>
> Not a problem.
>
> When Windows finally Dumps XP for some Slow, Ponderous Bug ridden
> excuse for an OS, I'm giving up on it and using Ubuntu / Open source
> Software.
>
> Hali Richard Stallman !
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Stallman
>
>
>
>

Yeah! Got kiss RS hairy ass!
He's waiting for you right now!...LOL!
Frank
 
>You've proly got an infected box and are to arrogantly stupid that you
>don't realize it. You deserve what you've got.


>Frank


Frank loves to show his contempt for everyone that doesn't worship
Microsoft like he does.
 
On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 06:54:45 -0700, Frank <fb@sto.clm> wrote:

>Yeah! Got kiss RS hairy ass!
>He's waiting for you right now!...LOL!
>Frank


Frank just being Frank.
 
Adam Albright wrote:

>>You've proly got an infected box and are to arrogantly stupid that you
>>don't realize it. You deserve what you've got.

>
>
>>Frank

>
>
> Frank loves to show his contempt for everyone that doesn't worship
> Microsoft like he does.
>

By PowerUser:
"Licentious. Obnoxious. Anti-democratic. In case you can't tell, I'm
making a direct reference to Mr. Adam Albright. Before I launch into my
main topic, I want to make a few matters crystal-clear: (1) Failure to
recognize this salient point will result in Adam's getting free reign to
enshrine irrational fears and fancies as truth, and (2) as a result of
that, my observations are perhaps unique. Now that you know where I
stand on those issues, I can safely say that wily cutthroats like Adam
are not born -- they are excreted. However unsavory that metaphor may
be, Adam acts as if he were King of the World. This hauteur is
astonishing, staggering, and mind-boggling. He truly believes that he
defends the real needs of the working class. It is just such
counter-productive megalomania, muddleheaded egoism, and intellectual
aberrancy that stirs Adam to carve out space in the mainstream for
ungrateful politics.

I want to draw two important conclusions from this. The first is that
Adam and his gofers are wolves in sheep's clothing who will create
profound emotional distress for people on both sides of the issue
eventually, and the second is that the justification he gave for seeking
to judge people by the color of their skin while ignoring the content of
their character was one of the most addlepated justifications I've ever
heard. It was so addlepated, in fact, that I will not repeat it here.
Even without hearing the details you can still see my point quite
clearly: Adam keeps telling everyone within earshot that honesty and
responsibility have no cash value and are therefore worthless. I'm
guessing that Adam read that on some Web site of dubious validity. More
reliable sources generally indicate that he isn't as smart as he thinks
he is. As an interesting experiment, try to point this out to
Adam. (You might want to don safety equipment first.) I think you'll
find that if he had even a shred of intellectual integrity, he'd admit
that he has no evidence or examples to back up his point. Still, I
recommend you check out some of his commentaries and draw your own
conclusions on the matter. Adam teaches workshops on clericalism.
Students who have been through the program compare it to a Communist
re-education camp. Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to
repeat it. Of course, if Adam had learned anything from history, he'd
know that I challenge him to point out any text in this letter that
proposes that we ought to worship feckless mountebanks as folk heroes.
It isn't there. There's neither a hint nor a suggestion of such a thing.


We no longer have the luxury of indulging in universalist, altruistic
principles that, no matter how noble they may appear, have enabled the
most self-satisfied spouters I've ever seen to compose paeans to
irrationalism. Didn't Adam tell his comrades that he wants to make
people suspicious of those who speak the truth? Did he first give any
thought to what would happen if he did? Of course, that question is
ridiculous -- as ridiculous as his gormless platitudes. None but the
grotesque can deny that he says that the sun rises just for him. What he
means by this, of course, is that he wants free reign to threaten the
existence of human life, perhaps all life on the planet. I understand
that I become truly impatient with people who refuse to recognize the
key role that he is playing in the destruction of our civilization, but
from the fog and mist of his disquisitions rises the leering grimace of
nihilism. An equal but opposite observation is that I and Adam part
company when it comes to the issue of quislingism. He feels that
those who disagree with him should be cast into the outer darkness,
should be shunned, should starve, while I suspect that he needs to stop
living in a fool's paradise. But there's the rub his idea of mutinous
autism is no political belief. It is a fierce and burning gospel of
hatred and intolerance, of murder and destruction, and the unloosing of
an irascible blood-lust. It is, in every sense, a doctrinaire and pagan
religion that incites its worshipers to an infernal frenzy and then
prompts them to precipitate riots.


Adam does not merely undermine the current world order. He does so
consciously, deliberately, willfully, and methodically. His undertakings
were never about tolerance and equality. That was just window dressing
for the "innocents". Rather, someone has been giving Adam's brain a very
thorough washing, and now Adam is trying to do the same to us. Several
things he has said have brought me to the boiling point. The statement
of his that made the strongest impression on me, however, was something
to the effect of how he is a refined gentleman with the soundest
education and morals you can imagine. Forgive me for boring you with all
the gory details, but Adam's hypocrisy is transparent. Even the least
discerning among us can see right through it.


It's easy to tell if Adam's lying. If his lips are moving, he's lying.
Although Adam demonstrates a great deal of ignorance and presumption
when he says that he commands an army of robots that live in the hollow
center of the earth and produce earthquakes whenever they feel like
shaking things up a bit on the surface, the fact remains that in order
to convince us that he has the authority to issue licenses for
practicing heathenism, Adam often turns to the old propagandist trick of
comparing results brought about by entirely dissimilar causes. Now that
you've read the bulk of this letter, it should not come as a complete
surprise that there can be no argument that when I first realized that
Mr. Adam Albright is a proponent of "paternalism" -- a term Adam uses
catachrestically in place of "Pyrrhonism" -- a cold shudder ran down my
back. However, this fact bears repeating again and again, until the
words crack through the hardened exteriors of those who would violate
the basic tenets of journalism and scholarship. I am referring, of
course, to the likes of Adam Albright."

Want to read more about this failed drunken accountant and big mouth
lying pig?
For your reading pleasure!

http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?hl=en&enc_user=tYag3woAAABrYFiZuwWGCKzw8oMmJKS7

Enjoy!
I know I did!...LOL!
Frank
 
Adam Albright wrote:

> On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 06:54:45 -0700, Frank <fb@sto.clm> wrote:
>
>
>>Yeah! Got kiss RS hairy ass!
>>He's waiting for you right now!...LOL!
>>Frank

>
>
> Frank just being Frank.
>

By PowerUser:
"Licentious. Obnoxious. Anti-democratic. In case you can't tell, I'm
making a direct reference to Mr. Adam Albright. Before I launch into my
main topic, I want to make a few matters crystal-clear: (1) Failure to
recognize this salient point will result in Adam's getting free reign to
enshrine irrational fears and fancies as truth, and (2) as a result of
that, my observations are perhaps unique. Now that you know where I
stand on those issues, I can safely say that wily cutthroats like Adam
are not born -- they are excreted. However unsavory that metaphor may
be, Adam acts as if he were King of the World. This hauteur is
astonishing, staggering, and mind-boggling. He truly believes that he
defends the real needs of the working class. It is just such
counter-productive megalomania, muddleheaded egoism, and intellectual
aberrancy that stirs Adam to carve out space in the mainstream for
ungrateful politics.

I want to draw two important conclusions from this. The first is that
Adam and his gofers are wolves in sheep's clothing who will create
profound emotional distress for people on both sides of the issue
eventually, and the second is that the justification he gave for seeking
to judge people by the color of their skin while ignoring the content of
their character was one of the most addlepated justifications I've ever
heard. It was so addlepated, in fact, that I will not repeat it here.
Even without hearing the details you can still see my point quite
clearly: Adam keeps telling everyone within earshot that honesty and
responsibility have no cash value and are therefore worthless. I'm
guessing that Adam read that on some Web site of dubious validity. More
reliable sources generally indicate that he isn't as smart as he thinks
he is. As an interesting experiment, try to point this out to
Adam. (You might want to don safety equipment first.) I think you'll
find that if he had even a shred of intellectual integrity, he'd admit
that he has no evidence or examples to back up his point. Still, I
recommend you check out some of his commentaries and draw your own
conclusions on the matter. Adam teaches workshops on clericalism.
Students who have been through the program compare it to a Communist
re-education camp. Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to
repeat it. Of course, if Adam had learned anything from history, he'd
know that I challenge him to point out any text in this letter that
proposes that we ought to worship feckless mountebanks as folk heroes.
It isn't there. There's neither a hint nor a suggestion of such a thing.


We no longer have the luxury of indulging in universalist, altruistic
principles that, no matter how noble they may appear, have enabled the
most self-satisfied spouters I've ever seen to compose paeans to
irrationalism. Didn't Adam tell his comrades that he wants to make
people suspicious of those who speak the truth? Did he first give any
thought to what would happen if he did? Of course, that question is
ridiculous -- as ridiculous as his gormless platitudes. None but the
grotesque can deny that he says that the sun rises just for him. What he
means by this, of course, is that he wants free reign to threaten the
existence of human life, perhaps all life on the planet. I understand
that I become truly impatient with people who refuse to recognize the
key role that he is playing in the destruction of our civilization, but
from the fog and mist of his disquisitions rises the leering grimace of
nihilism. An equal but opposite observation is that I and Adam part
company when it comes to the issue of quislingism. He feels that
those who disagree with him should be cast into the outer darkness,
should be shunned, should starve, while I suspect that he needs to stop
living in a fool's paradise. But there's the rub his idea of mutinous
autism is no political belief. It is a fierce and burning gospel of
hatred and intolerance, of murder and destruction, and the unloosing of
an irascible blood-lust. It is, in every sense, a doctrinaire and pagan
religion that incites its worshipers to an infernal frenzy and then
prompts them to precipitate riots.


Adam does not merely undermine the current world order. He does so
consciously, deliberately, willfully, and methodically. His undertakings
were never about tolerance and equality. That was just window dressing
for the "innocents". Rather, someone has been giving Adam's brain a very
thorough washing, and now Adam is trying to do the same to us. Several
things he has said have brought me to the boiling point. The statement
of his that made the strongest impression on me, however, was something
to the effect of how he is a refined gentleman with the soundest
education and morals you can imagine. Forgive me for boring you with all
the gory details, but Adam's hypocrisy is transparent. Even the least
discerning among us can see right through it.


It's easy to tell if Adam's lying. If his lips are moving, he's lying.
Although Adam demonstrates a great deal of ignorance and presumption
when he says that he commands an army of robots that live in the hollow
center of the earth and produce earthquakes whenever they feel like
shaking things up a bit on the surface, the fact remains that in order
to convince us that he has the authority to issue licenses for
practicing heathenism, Adam often turns to the old propagandist trick of
comparing results brought about by entirely dissimilar causes. Now that
you've read the bulk of this letter, it should not come as a complete
surprise that there can be no argument that when I first realized that
Mr. Adam Albright is a proponent of "paternalism" -- a term Adam uses
catachrestically in place of "Pyrrhonism" -- a cold shudder ran down my
back. However, this fact bears repeating again and again, until the
words crack through the hardened exteriors of those who would violate
the basic tenets of journalism and scholarship. I am referring, of
course, to the likes of Adam Albright."

Want to read more about this failed drunken accountant and big mouth
lying pig?
For your reading pleasure!

http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?hl=en&enc_user=tYag3woAAABrYFiZuwWGCKzw8oMmJKS7

Enjoy!
I know I did!...LOL!
Frank
 
Plato wrote:
> barnegatdx wrote:
>>
>>> No one cares what a Ubuntu is.

>>
>> Ubuntu Has over 8 Million users Worldwide
>>
>> http://rosbaitasille.worddprsess.com/23006/12/30/ubuntu-now-has-over-8-millions-users/

>
> There is NO way to tell how many people are using Ubuntu.


Correction: There is NO way to tell many Ubuntu people how.

But, of the 8 million alleged users, I have it on good authority that 4
million were African school children that were given the $100 laptop thingy.
Which they promptly ate.
 
Alias wrote:
>>
>> Great !! That mean Dallas, Houston, Amarillo and Albuquerque
>> comprise all of the world's Unbuntoo loosers.... er... users. Sorry,
>> Not impressive. My requested "comment" still stands.

>
>
> Um, it's spelled "losers". Now, what do Linux users lose? They lose
> worrying about viruses and malware. They lose worrying about WPA, WGA
> and DRM. They lose the BSOD experience. They lose having to get
> updates all over the place. They also lose having to pay for an
> operating system, Office, Photoshop and other programs. Yeah, Linux
> users are losers, all right, but in this case losing is a very good
> thing.
> A little English class for you:
>
> Lose is the opposite of win.
> Loose is the opposite of tight.
>


"Loose" is correct.

Linux is the blow-up vinyl doll of the software industry. For some deviates,
it's adequate.

The rest of us prefer the real thing. You can train the real thing.

Ow! That hurt!
 
Back
Top