Using MS Registry Ceaner

[Twayne]

In news:ukeOkr1zKHA.5164@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl,

Unknown typed:

> I believe you're correct. That was one of MS goofs. They

> bought out the company developing One Care.

> It is no longer available and has been replaced by

> Microsoft Security Essentials.

> Registry cleaners are nothing but disasters.



Says this obvious narcissist with such a closed mind only one

on this group is more closed than. It happens to those who are

followers and not leaders.



HTH,



Twayne`





"Nil" wrote in message

> news:Xns9D4A78B9CB02Fnilch1@130.133.4.11...

>> On 29 Mar 2010, "Unknown" wrote in

>> microsoft.public.windowsxp.general:

>>

>>> Can you post where MS recommends registry cleaning??????

>>

>> He's probably referring to this:

>>

>>

 

[Twayne]

When did you switch from 99.8% from 100%? Keep at it, you'll

figure out a way back to reality eventually.







In news:eGHPcU6zKHA.4656@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl,

Bruce Chambers typed:

> Terry R. wrote:

>> On 3/29/2010 9:14 AM On a whim, Unknown pounded out on the

>> keyboard

>>> Registry cleaners are nothing but disasters.

>>

>> Only in the hands of those that think they're a cure-all,

>> and don't have the knowledge to know how to properly use

>> them. Terry R.

>

>

> Which is @ 99.8% of the computing public.

 

[Twayne]

In news:O2zuEHB0KHA.5036@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl,

Unknown typed:

> I think it is closer to 99.9%.



Says this obvious narcissist with such a closed mind only one

on this group is more closed than. It happens to those who are

followers and not leaders.



HTH,



Twayne`



> "Bruce Chambers" wrote in message

> news:eGHPcU6zKHA.4656@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>> Terry R. wrote:

>>> On 3/29/2010 9:14 AM On a whim, Unknown pounded out on

>>> the keyboard

>>>> Registry cleaners are nothing but disasters.

>>>

>>> Only in the hands of those that think they're a cure-all,

>>> and don't have the knowledge to know how to properly use

>>> them. Terry R.

>>

>>

>> Which is @ 99.8% of the computing public.

>>

>>

>> --

>>

>> Bruce Chambers

>>

>> Help us help you:

>> http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

>>

>> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/555375

>>

>> They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little

>> temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.

>> ~Benjamin Franklin Many people would rather die than think

>> in fact, most do.

>> ~Bertrand Russell

>>

>> The philosopher has never killed any priests, whereas the

>> priest has killed a great many philosophers.

>> ~ Denis Diderot

 

[Twayne]

In news:%23DhCHkC0KHA.5036@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl,

Unknown typed:

> I said 'I Think'. Opinion. Almost impossible to get this

> kind of fact.



If it were true, that wouldn't be the case. There are plenty

of cites for the opposite though and they are fully aware of

them.



HTH,



Twayne`





"Terry R." wrote in

> message news:ewkaKaC0KHA.3572@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

>> On 3/30/2010 7:03 AM On a whim, Unknown pounded out on the

>> keyboard

>>> I think it is closer to 99.9%.

>>> "Bruce Chambers" wrote in message

>>> news:eGHPcU6zKHA.4656@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>>>> Terry R. wrote:

>>>>> On 3/29/2010 9:14 AM On a whim, Unknown pounded out on

>>>>> the keyboard

>>>>>> Registry cleaners are nothing but disasters.

>>>>> Only in the hands of those that think they're a

>>>>> cure-all, and don't have

>>>>> the knowledge to know how to properly use them.

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Terry R.

>>>>

>>>> Which is @ 99.8% of the computing public.

>>>>

>>

>> Opinion or can you site facts?

>>

>>

>> Terry R.

>> --

>> Anti-spam measures are included in my email address.

>> Delete NOSPAM from the email address after clicking Reply.

 

[Twayne]

In news:eOAdDnC0KHA.2512@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl,

Bob I typed:

> Actually it is probably better than that. It appears that

> about 1% of the US population works in a computer related

> field. So if even 1/2 of them are able to understand what

> they are doing to the registry that would put you around

> 99.5%



IFF it were a fact, that is. Millions of people know better.





HTH,



Twayne`



>

> Unknown wrote:

>

>> I think it is closer to 99.9%.

>> "Bruce Chambers" wrote in message

>> news:eGHPcU6zKHA.4656@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>>

>>> Terry R. wrote:

>>>

>>>> On 3/29/2010 9:14 AM On a whim, Unknown pounded out on

>>>> the keyboard

>>>>> Registry cleaners are nothing but disasters.

>>>>

>>>> Only in the hands of those that think they're a

>>>> cure-all, and don't have the knowledge to know how to

>>>> properly use them. Terry R.

>>>

>>>

>>> Which is @ 99.8% of the computing public.

>>>

>>>

>>> --

>>>

>>> Bruce Chambers

>>>

>>> Help us help you:

>>> http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

>>>

>>> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/555375

>>>

>>> They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a

>>> little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor

>>> safety. ~Benjamin Franklin Many people would rather die

>>> than think in fact, most

>>> do. ~Bertrand Russell

>>>

>>> The philosopher has never killed any priests, whereas the

>>> priest has killed a great many philosophers.

>>> ~ Denis Diderot

 

[Twayne]

In news:ehghClC0KHA.3884@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl,

Unknown typed:

> Are you another 'Twayne' ?



Let's see some proof of your allegations. Not claim, proof.

Not anecdotal, proof. There are plenty of descriptions

covering how AV works - but none making any claims even close

to the ones you parrot from your infamous leader.



HTH,



Twayne`





"Terry R." wrote in message

> news:O3PG1ZC0KHA.3572@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

>> On 3/29/2010 6:05 PM On a whim, Bruce Chambers pounded out

>> on the keyboard

>>> Terry R. wrote:

>>>> On 3/29/2010 9:14 AM On a whim, Unknown pounded out on

>>>> the keyboard

>>>>> Registry cleaners are nothing but disasters.

>>>> Only in the hands of those that think they're a

>>>> cure-all, and don't have the knowledge to know how to

>>>> properly use them. Terry R.

>>>

>>>

>>> Which is @ 99.8% of the computing public.

>>>

>>>

>>

>> Site?

>>

>>

>> Terry R.

>> --

>> Anti-spam measures are included in my email address.

>> Delete NOSPAM from the email address after clicking Reply.

 

[Twayne]

In news:OfoyZf3zKHA.2512@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl,

Bill in Co. typed:

> Pot? Or he's been listening to Twayne. Or both?



Nope, but he does sound like a person who can think for

himself, at least so far, as opposed to being ignorant

followers like most of your group are.



HTH,



Twayne`



> PA Bear [MS MVP] wrote:

>> WTF are you smoking?

>>

>> Johnny Shane wrote:

>>> snip>

>>> microsoft recommends registry cleaning once a month

>>>

>>> be sure to save the log file.

 

[Twayne]

In news:ePUggw3zKHA.4492@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl,

Unknown typed:

> I'll opt for both.



And,,,, that matters how?? Other than the love letters back

and forth.



HTH,



Twayne`





"Bill in Co." wrote in

> message news:OfoyZf3zKHA.2512@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>> Pot? Or he's been listening to Twayne. Or both?

>>

>> PA Bear [MS MVP] wrote:

>>> WTF are you smoking?

>>>

>>> Johnny Shane wrote:

>>>> snip>

>>>> microsoft recommends registry cleaning once a month

>>>>

>>>> be sure to save the log file.

 

[Twayne]

In news:O2g8uT6zKHA.4656@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl,

Bruce Chambers typed:

> Johnny Shane wrote:

>> On Mar 29, 10:22 am, John Doue wrote:

>>> Registry Cleaner is a neat tool when the standard

>>> uninstall process fails. I am wondering if there is a way

>>> to track changes made to

>>> the registry while removing a given entry with this

>>> Registry Cleaner? Thanks

>>> --

>>> John Doue

>>

>> microsoft recommends registry cleaning once a month

>>

>

>

> Where'd you get this nonsense?



Too lazy to search it out yourself? Woof!

 

[Terry R.]

On 3/30/2010 9:51 AM On a whim, Unknown pounded out on the keyboard



> Are you another 'Twayne' ?

> "Terry R." wrote in message

> news:O3PG1ZC0KHA.3572@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

>> On 3/29/2010 6:05 PM On a whim, Bruce Chambers pounded out on the keyboard

>>

>>> Terry R. wrote:

>>>> On 3/29/2010 9:14 AM On a whim, Unknown pounded out on the keyboard

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>> Registry cleaners are nothing but disasters.

>>>> Only in the hands of those that think they're a cure-all, and don't have

>>>> the knowledge to know how to properly use them.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Terry R.

>>>

>>> Which is @ 99.8% of the computing public.

>>>

>>>

>> Site?

>>

>>

>> Terry R.

>



I guess that's better than being another unknown...





Terry R.

--

Anti-spam measures are included in my email address.

Delete NOSPAM from the email address after clicking Reply.

 

[Unknown]

Good grief-you're playing stupid again. And I see you're winning.

"Twayne" wrote in message

news:eg3bx3D0KHA.5836@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

> In news:uuTE6O1zKHA.5036@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl,

> Unknown typed:

>> Can you post where MS recommends registry cleaning??????

>

> Too bad you don't know how to search for such things yourself. Try Google

> for one.

>

> HTH,

>

> Twayne`

> "Johnny Shane" wrote in message

>> news:c723c5cf-808c-467e-96bc-d9eff5b7be8c@y17g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...

>> On Mar 29, 10:22 am, John Doue wrote:

>>> Registry Cleaner is a neat tool when the standard

>>> uninstall process fails. I am wondering if there is a way to track

>>> changes made to

>>> the registry while removing a given entry with this

>>> Registry Cleaner? Thanks

>>> --

>>> John Doue

>>

>> microsoft recommends registry cleaning once a month

>>

>> be sure to save the log file.

>

>

>

 

[Unknown]

Well besides having no intelligence I see you also seriously lack in humor.

"Twayne" wrote in message

news:esv$N$D0KHA.928@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

> In news:ePUggw3zKHA.4492@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl,

> Unknown typed:

>> I'll opt for both.

>

> And,,,, that matters how?? Other than the love letters back and forth.

>

> HTH,

>

> Twayne`

>

>

> "Bill in Co." wrote in

>> message news:OfoyZf3zKHA.2512@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>>> Pot? Or he's been listening to Twayne. Or both?

>>>

>>> PA Bear [MS MVP] wrote:

>>>> WTF are you smoking?

>>>>

>>>> Johnny Shane wrote:

>>>>> snip>

>>>>> microsoft recommends registry cleaning once a month

>>>>>

>>>>> be sure to save the log file.

>

>

>

 

[Unknown]

Where on earth did you dig that up. Quoting emotions instead of facts again?

"Twayne" wrote in message

news:%23bfNq8D0KHA.2436@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

> In news:eOAdDnC0KHA.2512@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl,

> Bob I typed:

>> Actually it is probably better than that. It appears that

>> about 1% of the US population works in a computer related

>> field. So if even 1/2 of them are able to understand what

>> they are doing to the registry that would put you around

>> 99.5%

>

> IFF it were a fact, that is. Millions of people know better.

>

>

> HTH,

>

> Twayne`

>

>>

>> Unknown wrote:

>>

>>> I think it is closer to 99.9%.

>>> "Bruce Chambers" wrote in message

>>> news:eGHPcU6zKHA.4656@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>>>

>>>> Terry R. wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> On 3/29/2010 9:14 AM On a whim, Unknown pounded out on

>>>>> the keyboard

>>>>>> Registry cleaners are nothing but disasters.

>>>>>

>>>>> Only in the hands of those that think they're a

>>>>> cure-all, and don't have the knowledge to know how to

>>>>> properly use them. Terry R.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Which is @ 99.8% of the computing public.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> --

>>>>

>>>> Bruce Chambers

>>>>

>>>> Help us help you:

>>>> http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

>>>>

>>>> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/555375

>>>>

>>>> They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a

>>>> little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor

>>>> safety. ~Benjamin Franklin Many people would rather die than think in

>>>> fact, most

>>>> do. ~Bertrand Russell

>>>>

>>>> The philosopher has never killed any priests, whereas the

>>>> priest has killed a great many philosophers.

>>>> ~ Denis Diderot

>

>

>

 

[Bill in Co.]

Oh come on now! Twayne has already posted hundreds of sites proving his

claim of registry cleaners "improving performance and speeding up boot

times", including his very, very, own, "documentation reports" (snort).

You must have been asleep at the switch? For shame!



Unknown wrote:

> Where on earth did you dig that up. Quoting emotions instead of facts

> again?

> "Twayne" wrote in message

> news:%23bfNq8D0KHA.2436@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

>> In news:eOAdDnC0KHA.2512@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl,

>> Bob I typed:

>>> Actually it is probably better than that. It appears that

>>> about 1% of the US population works in a computer related

>>> field. So if even 1/2 of them are able to understand what

>>> they are doing to the registry that would put you around

>>> 99.5%

>>

>> IFF it were a fact, that is. Millions of people know better.

>>

>>

>> HTH,

>>

>> Twayne`

>>

>>>

>>> Unknown wrote:

>>>

>>>> I think it is closer to 99.9%.

>>>> "Bruce Chambers" wrote in message

>>>> news:eGHPcU6zKHA.4656@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>>>>

>>>>> Terry R. wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> On 3/29/2010 9:14 AM On a whim, Unknown pounded out on

>>>>>> the keyboard

>>>>>>> Registry cleaners are nothing but disasters.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Only in the hands of those that think they're a

>>>>>> cure-all, and don't have the knowledge to know how to

>>>>>> properly use them. Terry R.

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Which is @ 99.8% of the computing public.

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> --

>>>>>

>>>>> Bruce Chambers

>>>>>

>>>>> Help us help you:

>>>>> http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

>>>>>

>>>>> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/555375

>>>>>

>>>>> They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a

>>>>> little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor

>>>>> safety. ~Benjamin Franklin Many people would rather die than think in

>>>>> fact, most

>>>>> do. ~Bertrand Russell

>>>>>

>>>>> The philosopher has never killed any priests, whereas the

>>>>> priest has killed a great many philosophers.

>>>>> ~ Denis Diderot

 

[Twayne]

In news:%23YQbLcI0KHA.348@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl,

Bill in Co. typed:

> Oh come on now! Twayne has already posted hundreds of

> sites proving his claim of registry cleaners "improving

> performance and speeding up boot times", including his

> very, very, own, "documentation reports" (snort). You must

> have been asleep at the switch? For shame!



You lie: I have only done so once, long ago. The White Papers

have never been repeated here - I figure you closed minds can

find and/or already know how wrong you are so it's up to you

to get yourselves up to date.



HTH,



Twayne`



> Unknown wrote:

>> Where on earth did you dig that up. Quoting emotions

>> instead of facts again?

>> "Twayne" wrote in message

>> news:%23bfNq8D0KHA.2436@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

>>> In news:eOAdDnC0KHA.2512@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl,

>>> Bob I typed:

>>>> Actually it is probably better than that. It appears that

>>>> about 1% of the US population works in a computer related

>>>> field. So if even 1/2 of them are able to understand what

>>>> they are doing to the registry that would put you around

>>>> 99.5%

>>>

>>> IFF it were a fact, that is. Millions of people know

>>> better. HTH,

>>>

>>> Twayne`

>>>

>>>>

>>>> Unknown wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> I think it is closer to 99.9%.

>>>>> "Bruce Chambers" wrote in

>>>>> message news:eGHPcU6zKHA.4656@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>>>>>

>>>>>> Terry R. wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> On 3/29/2010 9:14 AM On a whim, Unknown pounded out on

>>>>>>> the keyboard

>>>>>>>> Registry cleaners are nothing but disasters.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Only in the hands of those that think they're a

>>>>>>> cure-all, and don't have the knowledge to know how to

>>>>>>> properly use them. Terry R.

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Which is @ 99.8% of the computing public.

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> --

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Bruce Chambers

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Help us help you:

>>>>>> http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

>>>>>>

>>>>>> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/555375

>>>>>>

>>>>>> They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a

>>>>>> little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor

>>>>>> safety. ~Benjamin Franklin Many people would rather

>>>>>> die than think in fact, most

>>>>>> do. ~Bertrand Russell

>>>>>>

>>>>>> The philosopher has never killed any priests, whereas

>>>>>> the priest has killed a great many philosophers.

>>>>>> ~ Denis Diderot

 

[Unknown]

I guess you're right. His registry cleaners is very similar to all the

automobile gas saving ideas.

I accelerate slowly and save 10%

I don't exceed 60 MPH and save 8%

I have regular tune-ups and save 30%.

I fill up at night (when its cold and therefore the gas is denser) and save

15%.

I installed a pressure regulator on my gas line and now save 35%.

Brakes are adjusted to eliminate drag (friction) and I save 12%

I removed the roof rack to eliminate drag and saved 18%

PROBLEM is: I now have to remove gas from my tank every few days.

"Bill in Co." wrote in message

news:%23YQbLcI0KHA.348@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

> Oh come on now! Twayne has already posted hundreds of sites proving his

> claim of registry cleaners "improving performance and speeding up boot

> times", including his very, very, own, "documentation reports" (snort).

> You must have been asleep at the switch? For shame!

>

> Unknown wrote:

>> Where on earth did you dig that up. Quoting emotions instead of facts

>> again?

>> "Twayne" wrote in message

>> news:%23bfNq8D0KHA.2436@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

>>> In news:eOAdDnC0KHA.2512@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl,

>>> Bob I typed:

>>>> Actually it is probably better than that. It appears that

>>>> about 1% of the US population works in a computer related

>>>> field. So if even 1/2 of them are able to understand what

>>>> they are doing to the registry that would put you around

>>>> 99.5%

>>>

>>> IFF it were a fact, that is. Millions of people know better.

>>>

>>>

>>> HTH,

>>>

>>> Twayne`

>>>

>>>>

>>>> Unknown wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> I think it is closer to 99.9%.

>>>>> "Bruce Chambers" wrote in message

>>>>> news:eGHPcU6zKHA.4656@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>>>>>

>>>>>> Terry R. wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> On 3/29/2010 9:14 AM On a whim, Unknown pounded out on

>>>>>>> the keyboard

>>>>>>>> Registry cleaners are nothing but disasters.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Only in the hands of those that think they're a

>>>>>>> cure-all, and don't have the knowledge to know how to

>>>>>>> properly use them. Terry R.

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Which is @ 99.8% of the computing public.

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> --

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Bruce Chambers

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Help us help you:

>>>>>> http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

>>>>>>

>>>>>> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/555375

>>>>>>

>>>>>> They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a

>>>>>> little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor

>>>>>> safety. ~Benjamin Franklin Many people would rather die than think

>>>>>> in

>>>>>> fact, most

>>>>>> do. ~Bertrand Russell

>>>>>>

>>>>>> The philosopher has never killed any priests, whereas the

>>>>>> priest has killed a great many philosophers.

>>>>>> ~ Denis Diderot

>

>

 

[LD55ZRA]

Unknown wrote:



>I believe you're correct. That was one of MS goofs. They bought out the

>company developing One Care.

>It is no longer available and has been replaced by Microsoft Security

>Essentials.

>Registry cleaners are nothing but disasters.

>

>

Don't talk rubbish. Microsoft is actively developing and supporting Online Scanner. The latest version is for Windows 7 and the link is here:







Your mummy should spend some time with you and teach you what is going on in this world!

 

[Unknown]

You are about as dense as they come. One care is by no means a registry

cleaner. It merely checks for obsolete items

which you yourself can do. IE If you delete a program (such as Norton) the

name may still be in the registry. One Care will find it and give you the

opportunity to delete it. But, that's all.

"LD55ZRA" wrote in message

news:hp8pp1$2sd$1@speranza.aioe.org...

> Unknown wrote:

>

>>I believe you're correct. That was one of MS goofs. They bought out the

>>company developing One Care.

>>It is no longer available and has been replaced by Microsoft Security

>>Essentials.

>>Registry cleaners are nothing but disasters.

>>

> Don't talk rubbish. Microsoft is actively developing and supporting

> Online Scanner. The latest version is for Windows 7 and the link is here:

>

>

>

> Your mummy should spend some time with you and teach you what is going on

> in this world!

>

>

 

[Twayne]

In news:%23wt8lrB1KHA.3412@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl,

Unknown typed:

> You are about as dense as they come. One care is by no

> means a registry cleaner. It merely checks for obsolete

> items



Interesting where can I verify that information?



HTH,



Twayne`



which you yourself can do. IE If you delete a program (such

> as Norton) the name may still be in the registry. One Care

> will find it and give you the opportunity to delete it.

> But, that's all. "LD55ZRA"



That's what one might call orphaned entries if they don't

matter to anything, why bother removing them at all? That's

definitely what one would call "cleaning" the registry.



HTH,



Twayne`





wrote in message

> news:hp8pp1$2sd$1@speranza.aioe.org...

>> Unknown wrote:

>>

>>> I believe you're correct. That was one of MS goofs. They

>>> bought out the company developing One Care.

>>> It is no longer available and has been replaced by

>>> Microsoft Security Essentials.

>>> Registry cleaners are nothing but disasters.

>>>

>> Don't talk rubbish. Microsoft is actively developing and

>> supporting Online Scanner. The latest version is for

>> Windows 7 and the link is here:

>>

>>

>> Your mummy should spend some time with you and teach you

>> what is going on in this world!

 

[Unknown]

Since you have multiple registry cleaners, run them and then run One Care

and compare the results.

"Twayne" wrote in message

news:O2VTOLE1KHA.220@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

> In news:%23wt8lrB1KHA.3412@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl,

> Unknown typed:

>> You are about as dense as they come. One care is by no

>> means a registry cleaner. It merely checks for obsolete

>> items

>

> Interesting where can I verify that information?

>

> HTH,

>

> Twayne`

>

> which you yourself can do. IE If you delete a program (such

>> as Norton) the name may still be in the registry. One Care

>> will find it and give you the opportunity to delete it.

>> But, that's all. "LD55ZRA"

>

> That's what one might call orphaned entries if they don't matter to

> anything, why bother removing them at all? That's definitely what one

> would call "cleaning" the registry.

>

> HTH,

>

> Twayne`

>

>

> wrote in message

>> news:hp8pp1$2sd$1@speranza.aioe.org...

>>> Unknown wrote:

>>>

>>>> I believe you're correct. That was one of MS goofs. They

>>>> bought out the company developing One Care.

>>>> It is no longer available and has been replaced by

>>>> Microsoft Security Essentials.

>>>> Registry cleaners are nothing but disasters.

>>>>

>>> Don't talk rubbish. Microsoft is actively developing and

>>> supporting Online Scanner. The latest version is for

>>> Windows 7 and the link is here:

>>>

>>>

>>> Your mummy should spend some time with you and teach you

>>> what is going on in this world!

>

>

>