F
Frank
Re: Ubuntu is MUCH Easier to Install than Windows - NOT
Alias wrote:
> Leythos wrote:
>
>> In article <g26nig$bb6$1@aioe.org>, iamalias@NOSPAMPLEASEgmail.com
>> says...
>>
>>> Leythos wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <g26l7c$24a$1@aioe.org>, iamalias@NOSPAMPLEASEgmail.com
>>>> says...
>>>>
>>>>> Leythos wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article <g26gd5$f9t$1@aioe.org>, iamalias@NOSPAMPLEASEgmail.com
>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My hard drive went south so I had to reinstall Ubuntu. I timed it
>>>>>>> and it took exactly one hour to install Ubuntu, download and
>>>>>>> install 124 updates, all the programs I use and tweaking Compiz
>>>>>>> Fusion to my liking.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Windows XP, OTOH, on the same drive, took DAYS to finish.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then you didn't know what you were doing.
>>>>>
>>>>> And then Leythos proves he doesn't know what he's doing:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Vista Business - 38 minutes to install because I wasn't paying
>>>>>> attention to prompts.
>>>>>
>>>>> Note, I said XP, not Vista Business. Nonetheless, 38 minutes is a lie.
>>>>
>>>> Nope, you posted to a Vista group, not an XP group,
>>>
>>> I know.
>>>
>>>> so you were confused and trolling
>>>
>>> I wasn't.
>>>
>>>> - my times are completely accurate.
>>>
>>> Liar.
>>>
>>>>>> MS Office 2007 Prof - 12 minutes to install.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's the only program you use? You just activate both Vista and
>>>>> Office upon install or aren't you counting that? I wait a few days
>>>>> before activating XP or Office 2003 in case something went awry
>>>>> during the install.
>>>>
>>>> Activation took seconds, always has. No reason to wait, activation
>>>> works fine, no reason to delay.
>>>
>>> Is Office the only program you use?
>>>
>>>>>> Worked with system while it downloaded updates in the background -
>>>>>> 0 min
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Let it install updates when I was done - 0 min
>>>>>
>>>>> Pretty stupid of you to do the above but, hey, it's your computer.
>>>>
>>>> Why, you blindly install Ubuntu updates and I've had that crash
>>>> Ubuntu more than once, so what's the difference. It's worked on more
>>>> than 50 computers I've done so far. Ubuntu has a less spectacular
>>>> record in my experience.
>>>
>>> I wasn't referring to which updates to download but the way you were
>>> installing updates is stupid. I've never had Ubuntu crash.
>>>
>>>>>> Less than half of Ubuntu - thanks for making the point Alias.
>>>>>
>>>>> Liar.
>>>>
>>>> You can't do basic addition very well.
>>>
>>> Oh, I can. I just don't believe your figures.
>>>
>>>>>> Oh, no searching for drivers, no anything, all my printers,
>>>>>> drives, screens, devices just worked as soon as I connected them.
>>>>>
>>>>> You didn't have to install your video drivers? Sound drivers? You
>>>>> didn't have to install Java, Flash, an AV, anti malware app, or any
>>>>> other program?
>>>>>
>>>>> Lies don't cut it, Leythos, and you're obviously lying and know
>>>>> nothing about how to install Vista or XP properly, much less Ubuntu.
>>>>
>>>> You posted to an Vista group, this is not an XP group, and you
>>>> didn't state what apps you installed, I did, and the times are
>>>> accurate.
>>>
>>> You said the only app you installed was Office and I don't believe
>>> you. I installed about 25 programs in Ubuntu.
>>>
>>>> You don't even own Vista or office 2007, at least according to you,
>>>> so you don't have a clue.
>>>
>>> I do own Vista and Office 03. I have no interest in Office 2007.
>>>
>>>> I didn't have to install any drivers, it worked out of the box.
>>>
>>> So your printer had no software to install? And your camera and
>>> scanner didn't either? So you didn't have to install Java, Flash, an
>>> AV, anti malware app or any other programs besides Office? Yasee,
>>> this is the kind of thing that makes people believe your LYING.
>>
>>
>> Again, I've stated my times and apps, that I didn't need any manual
>> installation of drivers, it was all done automatically for me,
>> quickly, easily, worked out of the box as it's suppose to work.
>>
>> You have a bias against MS, I have no such bias against any platform,
>> using them all myself, and find that each has the same problems.
>>
>> You post from anger, I post from relaxed testing and working with them.
>>
>
> No, I post from empirical evidence.
hehehe...you're a known and admitted liar. Who the fukk do you think
you're fooling this late in the game. GD!
You most certainly must be as dumb as you appear to be!...LOL!
Frank
Alias wrote:
> Leythos wrote:
>
>> In article <g26nig$bb6$1@aioe.org>, iamalias@NOSPAMPLEASEgmail.com
>> says...
>>
>>> Leythos wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <g26l7c$24a$1@aioe.org>, iamalias@NOSPAMPLEASEgmail.com
>>>> says...
>>>>
>>>>> Leythos wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article <g26gd5$f9t$1@aioe.org>, iamalias@NOSPAMPLEASEgmail.com
>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My hard drive went south so I had to reinstall Ubuntu. I timed it
>>>>>>> and it took exactly one hour to install Ubuntu, download and
>>>>>>> install 124 updates, all the programs I use and tweaking Compiz
>>>>>>> Fusion to my liking.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Windows XP, OTOH, on the same drive, took DAYS to finish.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then you didn't know what you were doing.
>>>>>
>>>>> And then Leythos proves he doesn't know what he's doing:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Vista Business - 38 minutes to install because I wasn't paying
>>>>>> attention to prompts.
>>>>>
>>>>> Note, I said XP, not Vista Business. Nonetheless, 38 minutes is a lie.
>>>>
>>>> Nope, you posted to a Vista group, not an XP group,
>>>
>>> I know.
>>>
>>>> so you were confused and trolling
>>>
>>> I wasn't.
>>>
>>>> - my times are completely accurate.
>>>
>>> Liar.
>>>
>>>>>> MS Office 2007 Prof - 12 minutes to install.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's the only program you use? You just activate both Vista and
>>>>> Office upon install or aren't you counting that? I wait a few days
>>>>> before activating XP or Office 2003 in case something went awry
>>>>> during the install.
>>>>
>>>> Activation took seconds, always has. No reason to wait, activation
>>>> works fine, no reason to delay.
>>>
>>> Is Office the only program you use?
>>>
>>>>>> Worked with system while it downloaded updates in the background -
>>>>>> 0 min
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Let it install updates when I was done - 0 min
>>>>>
>>>>> Pretty stupid of you to do the above but, hey, it's your computer.
>>>>
>>>> Why, you blindly install Ubuntu updates and I've had that crash
>>>> Ubuntu more than once, so what's the difference. It's worked on more
>>>> than 50 computers I've done so far. Ubuntu has a less spectacular
>>>> record in my experience.
>>>
>>> I wasn't referring to which updates to download but the way you were
>>> installing updates is stupid. I've never had Ubuntu crash.
>>>
>>>>>> Less than half of Ubuntu - thanks for making the point Alias.
>>>>>
>>>>> Liar.
>>>>
>>>> You can't do basic addition very well.
>>>
>>> Oh, I can. I just don't believe your figures.
>>>
>>>>>> Oh, no searching for drivers, no anything, all my printers,
>>>>>> drives, screens, devices just worked as soon as I connected them.
>>>>>
>>>>> You didn't have to install your video drivers? Sound drivers? You
>>>>> didn't have to install Java, Flash, an AV, anti malware app, or any
>>>>> other program?
>>>>>
>>>>> Lies don't cut it, Leythos, and you're obviously lying and know
>>>>> nothing about how to install Vista or XP properly, much less Ubuntu.
>>>>
>>>> You posted to an Vista group, this is not an XP group, and you
>>>> didn't state what apps you installed, I did, and the times are
>>>> accurate.
>>>
>>> You said the only app you installed was Office and I don't believe
>>> you. I installed about 25 programs in Ubuntu.
>>>
>>>> You don't even own Vista or office 2007, at least according to you,
>>>> so you don't have a clue.
>>>
>>> I do own Vista and Office 03. I have no interest in Office 2007.
>>>
>>>> I didn't have to install any drivers, it worked out of the box.
>>>
>>> So your printer had no software to install? And your camera and
>>> scanner didn't either? So you didn't have to install Java, Flash, an
>>> AV, anti malware app or any other programs besides Office? Yasee,
>>> this is the kind of thing that makes people believe your LYING.
>>
>>
>> Again, I've stated my times and apps, that I didn't need any manual
>> installation of drivers, it was all done automatically for me,
>> quickly, easily, worked out of the box as it's suppose to work.
>>
>> You have a bias against MS, I have no such bias against any platform,
>> using them all myself, and find that each has the same problems.
>>
>> You post from anger, I post from relaxed testing and working with them.
>>
>
> No, I post from empirical evidence.
hehehe...you're a known and admitted liar. Who the fukk do you think
you're fooling this late in the game. GD!
You most certainly must be as dumb as you appear to be!...LOL!
Frank