OS Smackdown: Linux vs. Mac OS X vs. Windows Vista vs. Windows XP

  • Thread starter Thread starter oh great
  • Start date Start date
I LOVE BEING RIGHT ALL THE TIME, Ive been saying this thing even before
Vista was out of beta!

"Windows Vista has changed all that. Never has a Microsoft operating system
been greeted with such a lack of enthusiasm from consumers and businesses
alike. Whether it's because of Vista's confusing array of versions, its
hefty hardware requirements, its driver issues or its invasive security
features, users are resisting the upgrade to Vista and considering other
options, from Mac OS X to Linux to just sticking with Windows XP, thank you
very much"

Basically vista is crap.. but they cant say that on the article.. but I can!
lol


VISTA IS CRAPISTA!


"oh great" <oh@great.ge> wrote in message
news:47fbd7f6@newsgate.x-privat.org...
> http://www.computerworld.com/action...leBasic&articleId=9075000&source=rss_topic125
>
 
"oh great" <oh@great.ge> wrote in message
news:47fbdb50$3@newsgate.x-privat.org...
>I LOVE BEING RIGHT ALL THE TIME, Ive been saying this thing even before
>Vista was out of beta!
>
> "Windows Vista has changed all that. Never has a Microsoft operating
> system been greeted with such a lack of enthusiasm from consumers and
> businesses alike. Whether it's because of Vista's confusing array of
> versions, its hefty hardware requirements, its driver issues or its
> invasive security features, users are resisting the upgrade to Vista and
> considering other options, from Mac OS X to Linux to just sticking with
> Windows XP, thank you very much"
>
> Basically vista is crap.. but they cant say that on the article.. but I
> can! lol
>
>
> VISTA IS CRAPISTA!
>
What a crock. You love being right all the time? Give me a break. You are
an idiot all the time.
 
Re: OS Smackdown: Linux vs. Mac OS X vs. Windows Vista vs. WindowsXP

On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 23:24:29 +0300, oh great wrote:

> http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?
command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9075000&source=rss_topic125

Interesting to note that in the 'voting poll' both Linux and MAC show
about as well as vista + xp.
 
Re: OS Smackdown: Linux vs. Mac OS X vs. Windows Vista vs. WindowsXP

oh great piece of sh*t for brains loser wrote:

> I LOVE BEING RIGHT ALL THE TIME, Ive been saying this thing even before
> Vista was out of beta!
>
What is it you're right about? You've got a handful of wannabe e-rag
journalists that think for you?
You're an idiot...plain and simple.
Get life loser...LOL!
Frank
 
Frank, its simple, the articles that bash vista and basically say its crap,
outnumber the articles that praise vista 100 to zero

if Vista was any good you would see articles saying that vista is good.

Then take a walk in blogland ... you never see many people saying vista is
good.. the best compliment of vista you can find is that "I dont understand
all the negativity around vista, it works for me!"

LOL you have a POS product in your hands YOU POS APE!

Its about time to leave now.. Im fed up with you....


"Frank" <fab@notspam.com> wrote in message
news:OdIy71bmIHA.3400@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> oh great piece of sh*t for brains loser wrote:
>
>> I LOVE BEING RIGHT ALL THE TIME, Ive been saying this thing even before
>> Vista was out of beta!
>>
> What is it you're right about? You've got a handful of wannabe e-rag
> journalists that think for you?
> You're an idiot...plain and simple.
> Get life loser...LOL!
> Frank
 
Re: OS Smackdown: Linux vs. Mac OS X vs. Windows Vista vs. WindowsXP

oh great wrote:
> Frank, its simple, the articles that bash vista and basically say its crap,
> outnumber the articles that praise vista 100 to zero

No, that is simply one of your delusional lies. Besides, e-raggers and
you don't use Vista in a real production setting so they have no real
idea of it's vast capabilities.
Those of use who actually use Vista in productive environment know what
it is capable of.
You don't.
Frank
 
Re: OS Smackdown: Linux vs. Mac OS X vs. Windows Vista vs. WindowsXP

ray wrote:

> On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 23:24:29 +0300, oh great wrote:
>
>
>>http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?
>
> command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9075000&source=rss_topic125
>
> Interesting to note that in the 'voting poll' both Linux and MAC show
> about as well as vista + xp.

Let us not pretend that this is in any way a scientifically conducted,
randomly sampled survey, cause it isn't.
Frank
 
WRRONNNNNNNNNNNNNGGGGGGGGG!!!
You have no clue, franky-poo (hey I made a rhyme)

only an idiot like you would put vista on in a company of any size... lol
Not that your imaginary company exists, but its stupid even for an imaginary
company.

the best computer experts say stay away from vista and are planning to skip
it altogether...


"Frank" <fab@notspam.com> wrote in message
news:%23mRySVcmIHA.5260@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> oh great wrote:
>> Frank, its simple, the articles that bash vista and basically say its
>> crap, outnumber the articles that praise vista 100 to zero
>
> No, that is simply one of your delusional lies. Besides, e-raggers and you
> don't use Vista in a real production setting so they have no real idea of
> it's vast capabilities.
> Those of use who actually use Vista in productive environment know what it
> is capable of.
> You don't.
> Frank
 
Re: OS Smackdown: Linux vs. Mac OS X vs. Windows Vista vs. Windows XP

Annoucment to everyone

frank is stupid, please ignore him



"Frank" <fab@notspam.com> wrote in message
news:%23fga6WcmIHA.4196@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> ray wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 23:24:29 +0300, oh great wrote:
>>
>>
>>>http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?
>>
>> command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9075000&source=rss_topic125
>>
>> Interesting to note that in the 'voting poll' both Linux and MAC show
>> about as well as vista + xp.
>
> Let us not pretend that this is in any way a scientifically conducted,
> randomly sampled survey, cause it isn't.
> Frank
 
You really are a complete moron and retard. Kevpan815 has more brains than
you have. Why are you even here? All you do is cause trouble. Maybe you
should take your computer, power it up, bring it to the bathroom and fill
the tub. Once the water is at least 3 inches, step in the tub with your
computer.

Just FYI

"oh great" <oh@great.ge> wrote in message
news:47fbeedf$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...
> WRRONNNNNNNNNNNNNGGGGGGGGG!!!
> You have no clue, franky-poo (hey I made a rhyme)
>
> only an idiot like you would put vista on in a company of any size... lol
> Not that your imaginary company exists, but its stupid even for an
> imaginary company.
>
> the best computer experts say stay away from vista and are planning to
> skip it altogether...
>
>
> "Frank" <fab@notspam.com> wrote in message
> news:%23mRySVcmIHA.5260@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>> oh great wrote:
>>> Frank, its simple, the articles that bash vista and basically say its
>>> crap, outnumber the articles that praise vista 100 to zero
>>
>> No, that is simply one of your delusional lies. Besides, e-raggers and
>> you don't use Vista in a real production setting so they have no real
>> idea of it's vast capabilities.
>> Those of use who actually use Vista in productive environment know what
>> it is capable of.
>> You don't.
>> Frank
>
>
 
Re: OS Smackdown: Linux vs. Mac OS X vs. Windows Vista vs. Windows XP

"oh great" <oh@great.ge> wrote in message
news:47fbef99$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...
> Annoucment to everyone
>
> frank is stupid, please ignore him
>
>

Actually, I changed my mind. If you had 1000 bonus points you would be
classified as a retard!


>
> "Frank" <fab@notspam.com> wrote in message
> news:%23fga6WcmIHA.4196@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> ray wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 23:24:29 +0300, oh great wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?
>>>
>>> command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9075000&source=rss_topic125
>>>
>>> Interesting to note that in the 'voting poll' both Linux and MAC show
>>> about as well as vista + xp.
>>
>> Let us not pretend that this is in any way a scientifically conducted,
>> randomly sampled survey, cause it isn't.
>> Frank
>
>
 
Re: OS Smackdown: Linux vs. Mac OS X vs. Windows Vista vs. WindowsXP

oh great wrote:
> WRRONNNNNNNNNNNNNGGGGGGGGG!!!
> You have no clue, franky-poo (hey I made a rhyme)
>
> only an idiot like you would put vista on in a company of any size... lol
> Not that your imaginary company exists, but its stupid even for an imaginary
> company.
>
You're out of your fukkin mind! You have no idea how any company runs,
let alone mine. You're nothing but a big mouth POS delusional idiot and
everyone here knows it.
Best you just STFU and not make a bigger fool out of yourself.
Frank
 
Re: OS Smackdown: Linux vs. Mac OS X vs. Windows Vista vs. WindowsXP

oh great POS loser idiot wrote:

....hehehe you have no idea what a scientifically conducted, randomly
sampled survey is do you?...LOL!
You're way out of your league capin' crunch. Best you stick with trying
to build that cardboard space ship in your mom's basement!
Frank
 
Re: OS Smackdown: Linux vs. Mac OS X vs. Windows Vista vs. Windows XP

use one nick so I can avoid you please.



"Sal M'Nella" <salmnella@fridge.com> wrote in message
news:ebjwMdcmIHA.2304@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>
> "oh great" <oh@great.ge> wrote in message
> news:47fbef99$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...
>> Annoucment to everyone
>>
>> frank is stupid, please ignore him
>>
>>
>
> Actually, I changed my mind. If you had 1000 bonus points you would be
> classified as a retard!
>
>
>>
>> "Frank" <fab@notspam.com> wrote in message
>> news:%23fga6WcmIHA.4196@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>> ray wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 23:24:29 +0300, oh great wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?
>>>>
>>>> command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9075000&source=rss_topic125
>>>>
>>>> Interesting to note that in the 'voting poll' both Linux and MAC show
>>>> about as well as vista + xp.
>>>
>>> Let us not pretend that this is in any way a scientifically conducted,
>>> randomly sampled survey, cause it isn't.
>>> Frank
>>
>>
>
>
 
Re: OS Smackdown: Linux vs. Mac OS X vs. Windows Vista vs. WindowsXP

In article <OdIy71bmIHA.3400@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl>,
Frank <fab@notspam.com> wrote:
>>
>What is it you're right about? You've got a handful of wannabe e-rag
>journalists that think for you?

Well, FWIW, computerworld isn't a rag. They've been published since
the 80's, and have focused on the Intel and Windows PC world the entire time.
 
frank calls every site or blog an e-rag that doesnt agree with his distorted
view of vista, he doesnt care who writes or or what that site is..
his logic is simple

if they are saying vista is not good, then they cant be right... its an
e-rag.. lol


dumb, yes.. but its frank, so dont expect much.


"the wharf rat" <wrat@panix.com> wrote in message
news:ftgtau$chh$1@reader2.panix.com...
> In article <OdIy71bmIHA.3400@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl>,
> Frank <fab@notspam.com> wrote:
>>>
>>What is it you're right about? You've got a handful of wannabe e-rag
>>journalists that think for you?
>
> Well, FWIW, computerworld isn't a rag. They've been published since
> the 80's, and have focused on the Intel and Windows PC world the entire
> time.
>
 
Re: OS Smackdown: Linux vs. Mac OS X vs. Windows Vista vs. WindowsXP

the wharf rat wrote:

> In article <OdIy71bmIHA.3400@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl>,
> Frank <fab@notspam.com> wrote:
>
>>What is it you're right about? You've got a handful of wannabe e-rag
>>journalists that think for you?
>
>
> Well, FWIW, computerworld isn't a rag. They've been published since
> the 80's, and have focused on the Intel and Windows PC world the entire time.
>
No sh*t! A "rag" is trade talk for a magazine. E-rag refers to an
on-line magazine.
Frank
 
Re: OS Smackdown: Linux vs. Mac OS X vs. Windows Vista vs. WindowsXP

oh great POS idiot moron wrote:

....are you as dumb as you seem?
Why can't you get your one little install of Vista to run properly?
You are that stupid aren't you?
Frank
 
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 22:58:38 +0000 (UTC), wrat@panix.com (the wharf
rat) wrote:

> Well, FWIW, computerworld isn't a rag. They've been published since
> the 80's, and have focused on the Intel and Windows PC world the entire time.



Computerworld has published since the 1960s, well before there was an
"Intel and Windows PC world" to focus on.

--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
Please Reply to the Newsgroup
 
Back
Top