N
non flammable on XP
I have one of the most powerful computers that exist for the normal use...
its a 4 core with 4 gigs of ram.. BUT
I still see that vista is far slower and does not react the way I like..
I am a super power user..
I can tell when an OS is not good or configured correctly...
vista with all the tweaks in the world cannot match XP in speed
"forty-nine" <110001@49.xyz> wrote in message news:flrfcr$d0s$1@aioe.org...
> the wharf rat wrote:
>> In article <flqoc3$8pm$1@aioe.org>, forty-nine <110001@49.xyz> wrote:
>>> I have ubuntu, XP, and Vista.
>>> Vista is the most stable of the 3, then XP, then ubuntu (but I am new at
>>> ubuntu, playing with Xsettings)
>>
>> Well, not to kock vista which is after all just a desktop OS,
>> but generally speaking any unix is much more stable than any windows.
>> For one thing, it's much simpler. For another, it's not monolithic.
>> Very few non-kernel events are unrecoverable.
>>> If your PC has 2GB of RAM....why not use it?
>>
>> For what? Caching files I might maybe need a couple of bytes
>> from in a few days maybe sort of?
>
> A calculator would suffice for you.
> But for those of use with $3000 worth of hardware on a single PC....maybe
> we are looking for a little more.
>
> But if you are limited to a chinese made WalMart computer...put what works
> for you on it.
its a 4 core with 4 gigs of ram.. BUT
I still see that vista is far slower and does not react the way I like..
I am a super power user..
I can tell when an OS is not good or configured correctly...
vista with all the tweaks in the world cannot match XP in speed
"forty-nine" <110001@49.xyz> wrote in message news:flrfcr$d0s$1@aioe.org...
> the wharf rat wrote:
>> In article <flqoc3$8pm$1@aioe.org>, forty-nine <110001@49.xyz> wrote:
>>> I have ubuntu, XP, and Vista.
>>> Vista is the most stable of the 3, then XP, then ubuntu (but I am new at
>>> ubuntu, playing with Xsettings)
>>
>> Well, not to kock vista which is after all just a desktop OS,
>> but generally speaking any unix is much more stable than any windows.
>> For one thing, it's much simpler. For another, it's not monolithic.
>> Very few non-kernel events are unrecoverable.
>>> If your PC has 2GB of RAM....why not use it?
>>
>> For what? Caching files I might maybe need a couple of bytes
>> from in a few days maybe sort of?
>
> A calculator would suffice for you.
> But for those of use with $3000 worth of hardware on a single PC....maybe
> we are looking for a little more.
>
> But if you are limited to a chinese made WalMart computer...put what works
> for you on it.