linux might be better for you

[dennis@home]

"Twisted Vista" <TwistedVista@msnews.grp> wrote in message
news:uHfS94sDIHA.5208@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

> Why do Linux advocates hang out in a Windows news group? If Linux was a
> success,
> we would not see them here, because then we would have an obvious choice,
> or
> alternative. Vista may not be successful like that of Windows XP, but
> Windows 7
> will be, and Linux will remain where it is, unless Apple decides to place
> them on
> the dump pile too.


Apple does not use Linux.
They use a kernel based on FreeBSD not the Linux kernel.
Don't let the Linux advocates fool you into thinking Apple use Linux, they
never have and probably never will.

 

[dennis@home]

"Computer & Sound System Tech" <jonperreault@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:FB538985-ED9D-47C8-9DE3-B3D1DB69E541@microsoft.com...
> nope he's just trying to find the best os there's is that is why i'm
> shopping around for a free linux os(like that is hard to do, lol) that
> uses 32 bit drivers, actually found a couple, and i use them with
> virtualpc 2007 that way i get the very best os possible cuz windows just
> aint cuttin it. especially with that microsft bs that they have a code so
> the nsa can spy on you. i won't let them he he he

The code isn't in the OS.. they can still watch you if you use Linux.
He he he.

 

[Not Me]

I use both, both have plusses and minuses.
I like XP better than any release of Linux that I have tried by a mile.
Unfortunately I just can't force myself to like Vista.
If forced to choose, right now I think I would opt for XP first, but Linux
over Vista.
The main reason being, if I don't like it anyway, it better be FREE!
But for most users, Linux isn't ready for the desktop.
On the network I run, Linux works just fine with the software package we use
for accounting and management.
Since you're not supposed to be doing Facebook, MySpace and all that
garbage, it is actually a better choice than Winmdows.
Since the users can't quite figure out how to USE SOME OF THE NON BUSINESS
FEATURES, THEY ARE MORE PRODUCTIVE ON THOSE MACHINES THAT i HAVE CONVERTED
FROM ME and NT to Linux.
The XP machines I haven't converted, but if MS doesn't change things, they
will all go eventually.

"Carey Frisch [MVP]" <cnfrisch@nospamgmail.com> wrote in message
news:2310431F-C7BB-4E38-B434-0DBDD5D790EB@microsoft.com...
> People who advocate Open Sores Linux are truly miserable with their
> choice.
> It's obvious that they adhere to the old adage that "misery loves
> company".
> Every single arguement that offer to Windows users is blantently false and
> misleading.
> If you'll notice, there are over five (5) times the number of poor linux
> users looking for help in the linux newsgroups vs. the relativity low
> number
> of Windows users who post to this newsgroup. Linux is for losers!
>
> --
> Carey Frisch
> Microsoft MVP
> Windows - Shell/User
> Microsoft Community Newsgroups
> news://msnews.microsoft.com/
>
>
>
> "John Adams" wrote:
>
>> They should rename this forum: "linux.public.windows.vista.haters"
>>
>>
>> "arkara" <arkara@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:590F9332-C098-45C8-A0F9-EF28FF18659D@microsoft.com...
>> >i have been a windows user for many years until one day i found out
>> >about
>> > linux. many people when thay hear the word "linux" are terrified and
>> > tell
>> > me
>> > that it is very very dificult.
>> > this is wrong.
>> >
>> > linux over windows.
>> > 1) its free
>> > 2)its faster
>> > 3) its much more secure
>> > 4)has more bugfixes(people actualy work on open source)
>> > 5)many many applications
>> > 6) much of the hardware work out of the box
>> > 7)you can try it without loosing any data using live cds
>> > 8) linux has become very very easy to use and with no command line
>> > 9) can easyly dual boot with windows
>> > 10)most off all the ability to choose what you want
>> > 11) did you know that microsoft has secret codes on its windows
>> > software
>> > so
>> > that you are spyed on via the NSA?(national security agency)
>> > 12)no DRM(digital rights management)
>> > and many other things for you to discover.
>> > 13)fully customizable to your needs
>> >
>> > windows over linux.
>> > 1)widely accepted
>> > 2)more apps
>> > 3)easyer than linux(while linux is not so hard)
>> > 4)more hardware support
>> >
>> > you can give linux a try. i dont say that is will work for you 100% but
>> > the
>> > chances are good
>> > some popular linux distributions with a large comunity are
>> >
>> > ubuntu: www.ubuntu.com
>> > pclinuxos: www.pclinuxos.com
>> > you can find more distributions on www.distrowatch.com
>> >
>> > most linux distributions have live cds.
>> > you can download the iso image of the cd and then burn it on a cd or
>> > dvd
>> > then boot from it (sometimes you must configure your bios in order to
>> > boot
>> > first from cd drive)
>> >
>> > DISCLAIMER:THIS POST IS NOT OVEREVANGELIZING LINUX BUT JUST POINTS OUT
>> > THAT
>> > IT IS A VIABLE SOLUTION TO WINDOWS. THERE CAN ALWAYS BE DIFICULTIES
>> > WHEN
>> > CHANGING AN OPERATING SYSTEM. EVERY USER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR HIS OWN
>> > SYSTEM
>> > AND DATA. AND BEFORE ANY ACTION DATA MUST BE BACKED UP.
>> >
>> > REMEMBER PEOPLE IT'S ALL ABOUT CHOICE AND MICROSOFT DOES NOT GIVE YOU
>> > ANY
>>
>>

 

[Computer & Sound System Tech]

may be the problem with stealth update are also using the secret code to get
on your pc to install them who knows

--
New Licensed Boating Capt. Jonathan Perreault
http://www.AllAboutGames.BraveHost.com
- note: click continue, when it ask about security certificate -

Best Comments From Users:
Vista is satan's way to bring hell to earth.

A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely
foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.

No Matter The Problem Even With Linux, It's Microsoft's And Windows's Faults

Personnal Advice To You:
#1: Do Not Undermine Windows's Work, Or It'll Undermine You As A User.
#2: Torture Windows (Any) Now Before It Tortures You
#3: Windows Is Bad Enough In English, Why Get It In Another Language
"Charlie Tame" <charlie@tames.net> wrote in message
news:eidFbguDIHA.5044@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Computer & Sound System Tech wrote:
>> nope he's just trying to find the best os there's is that is why i'm
>> shopping around for a free linux os(like that is hard to do, lol) that
>> uses 32 bit drivers, actually found a couple, and i use them with
>> virtualpc 2007 that way i get the very best os possible cuz windows just
>> aint cuttin it. especially with that microsft bs that they have a code so
>> the nsa can spy on you. i won't let them he he he
>
>
> ermm Microsoft Virtual PC ???
>
> Now if there was ever an interesting place to put a back door
>
> I couldn't care less about the NSA to be honest, the bigger problem from
> an operational point of view is some stealth update that messes up a
> process or some WGA/WPA malfunction that declares us illegal for a time.
> MS have already admitted to both of those things in the same month, and
> given the dependency of many companies on MS software they need to address
> the problems / causes both rapidly and effectively, let's see less of
> Ballmer dancing on the stage and more reliability please.
>
> If you want easy Linux Ubuntu is maybe the answer, if you want solid
> reliability Debian is good. Solaris is probably better if you can ever get
> the F* thing to install on anything.

 

[Computer & Sound System Tech]

not unless i do a locked down on my pc, which disconnects me of the web by
closing all ports on the firewall. and beside if they want to see me
trashing the name microsoft then sure they can go ahead and spy ha ha ha ha
ha

--
New Licensed Boating Capt. Jonathan Perreault
http://www.AllAboutGames.BraveHost.com
- note: click continue, when it ask about security certificate -

Best Comments From Users:
Vista is satan's way to bring hell to earth.

A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely
foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.

No Matter The Problem Even With Linux, It's Microsoft's And Windows's Faults

Personnal Advice To You:
#1: Do Not Undermine Windows's Work, Or It'll Undermine You As A User.
#2: Torture Windows (Any) Now Before It Tortures You
#3: Windows Is Bad Enough In English, Why Get It In Another Language
"dennis@home" <dennis@killspam.kicks-ass.net> wrote in message
news:%23e8F75vDIHA.5044@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>
> "Computer & Sound System Tech" <jonperreault@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:FB538985-ED9D-47C8-9DE3-B3D1DB69E541@microsoft.com...
>> nope he's just trying to find the best os there's is that is why i'm
>> shopping around for a free linux os(like that is hard to do, lol) that
>> uses 32 bit drivers, actually found a couple, and i use them with
>> virtualpc 2007 that way i get the very best os possible cuz windows just
>> aint cuttin it. especially with that microsft bs that they have a code so
>> the nsa can spy on you. i won't let them he he he
>
> The code isn't in the OS.. they can still watch you if you use Linux.
> He he he.

 

[Twisted Vista]

There was a SuSE Linux for Macs once.

- Twisted Vista

"dennis@home" <dennis@killspam.kicks-ass.net> wrote in message
news:%23Emtx4vDIHA.5856@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
|
| "Twisted Vista" <TwistedVista@msnews.grp> wrote in message
| news:uHfS94sDIHA.5208@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
|
| > Why do Linux advocates hang out in a Windows news group? If Linux was a
| > success,
| > we would not see them here, because then we would have an obvious choice,
| > or
| > alternative. Vista may not be successful like that of Windows XP, but
| > Windows 7
| > will be, and Linux will remain where it is, unless Apple decides to place
| > them on
| > the dump pile too.
|
|
| Apple does not use Linux.
| They use a kernel based on FreeBSD not the Linux kernel.
| Don't let the Linux advocates fool you into thinking Apple use Linux, they
| never have and probably never will.
|

 

[Alias]

Titus Pullo wrote:
>
> "Carey Frisch [MVP]" <cnfrisch@nospamgmail.com> wrote in message
> news:2310431F-C7BB-4E38-B434-0DBDD5D790EB@microsoft.com...
>> People who advocate Open Sores Linux are truly miserable with their
>> choice.
>> It's obvious that they adhere to the old adage that "misery loves
>> company".
>> Every single arguement that offer to Windows users is blantently false
>> and
>> misleading.
>> If you'll notice, there are over five (5) times the number of poor linux
>> users looking for help in the linux newsgroups vs. the relativity low
>> number
>> of Windows users who post to this newsgroup. Linux is for losers!
>>
>
> I wouldn't go so far as to say Linux is for losers, but it isn't for
> someone who isn't very technically savvy. Easy tasks like installing an
> application on Vista are much harder on any Linux distro. You have to
> worry about dependencies, libraries, etc... Plus hardware support with
> Linux is hit and miss. Maybe your graphics/sound/network card is
> supported, maybe not. If not, you have to try and track it down on the
> Internet, if it exists.
>
> I've tried a couple of Linux distros over the years and each time
> concluded that Linux isn't worth bashing my head against a brick wall.
> I'll stick with Vista.

I can see it's been a long time since you've tried Linux and I doubt
very seriously you've tried Ubuntu.

--
Alias
To email me, remove shoes

 

[Alias]

Carey Frisch [MVP] wrote:
> People who advocate Open Sores Linux are truly miserable with their choice.

False.

> It's obvious that they adhere to the old adage that "misery loves company".

False.

> Every single arguement [sic] that [sic] offer to Windows users is blantently [sic] false and
> misleading.

False.

> If you'll notice, there are over five (5) times the number of poor linux
> users looking for help in the linux newsgroups vs. the relativity low number
> of Windows users who post to this newsgroup.

Extremely false.

> Linux is for losers!

So says the MVP with his head the furthest up MS' ass.

--
Alias
To email me, remove shoes

 

[Alias]

Twisted Vista wrote:
> "Charlie Tame" <charlie@tames.net> wrote in message
> news:eeVxtutDIHA.5208@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> | Titus Pullo wrote:
> | >
> | > "Charlie Tame" <charlie@tames.net> wrote in message
> | > news:Ox5knJtDIHA.4584@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> | >> Titus Pullo wrote:
> | >>>
> | >>> "Carey Frisch [MVP]" <cnfrisch@nospamgmail.com> wrote in message
> | >>> news:2310431F-C7BB-4E38-B434-0DBDD5D790EB@microsoft.com...
> | >>>> People who advocate Open Sores Linux are truly miserable with their
> | >>>> choice.
> | >>>> It's obvious that they adhere to the old adage that "misery loves
> | >>>> company".
> | >>>> Every single arguement that offer to Windows users is blantently
> | >>>> false and
> | >>>> misleading.
> | >>>> If you'll notice, there are over five (5) times the number of poor
> | >>>> linux
> | >>>> users looking for help in the linux newsgroups vs. the relativity
> | >>>> low number
> | >>>> of Windows users who post to this newsgroup. Linux is for losers!
> | >>>>
> | >>>
> | >>> I wouldn't go so far as to say Linux is for losers, but it isn't for
> | >>> someone who isn't very technically savvy. Easy tasks like installing
> | >>> an application on Vista are much harder on any Linux distro. You have
> | >>> to worry about dependencies, libraries, etc... Plus hardware support
> | >>> with Linux is hit and miss. Maybe your graphics/sound/network card is
> | >>> supported, maybe not. If not, you have to try and track it down on
> | >>> the Internet, if it exists.
> | >>>
> | >>> I've tried a couple of Linux distros over the years and each time
> | >>> concluded that Linux isn't worth bashing my head against a brick
> | >>> wall. I'll stick with Vista.
> | >>
> | >>
> | >> How many years ago was that exactly?
> | >
> | > Since about 2004. I've tried a couple of times. Fedora Core, SuSE. I
> | > last tried SLED 10 about 2 months ago. No, it wasn't a shot at Linux in
> | > 1998 and nothing since.
> |
> |
> | I was genuinely curious because I've found in the last couple of years
> | the leaps forward in "Friendly" have been quite surprising, whilst at
> | Redmond we seem to have gone for the hostility factor
> |
> | Most of the live CD versions, although they take a while to load being
> | CD based, work remarkably well on a lot of hardware, including going
> | online. I actually like Vista although the "Novelty" color scheme gets
> | very tiring for work, but it does have some real competition coming
> | round the corner.
>
> Correct, in one corner there is Windows XP, in the other corner is the coming of
> Windows 7. Linux will need light year leaps and bounds to be considered a
> competitor to Windows, it is still not even an alternative to Windows in the
> market place. Linux does not seem to have the presence Windows has. You can even
> go to a local department store and buy a Windows CD, there are billboards, TV
> adds, radio commercials,... Say Ubuntu somewhere and people will say U Bum Who
> Too....?
>
> - Twista Vista
>
>

All the real computer stores in Spain not only know what Ubuntu is, they
offer it. Oops.

--
Alias
To email me, remove shoes

 

[Leythos]

In article <590F9332-C098-45C8-A0F9-EF28FF18659D@microsoft.com>,
arkara@discussions.microsoft.com says...
> i have been a windows user for many years until one day i found out about
> linux. many people when thay hear the word "linux" are terrified and tell me
> that it is very very dificult.
> this is wrong.
>
> linux over windows.
> 1) its free

Only if you don't place a value on your time.

> 2)its faster

Faster than Vista, but what isn't, it's not faster than XP or 2003 or
2000.

> 3) its much more secure

And yet we still see compromised Linux machines and still find
uncompromised windows machines.

> 4)has more bugfixes(people actualy work on open source)

And it needs them.

> 5)many many applications

Same for Windows

> 6) much of the hardware work out of the box

Not true - newer hardware has less support, older hardware is supported
by "common" drivers that don't always provide specific product support.

> 7)you can try it without loosing any data using live cds

LOL - I've seen people wipe their machines by accident.

> 8) linux has become very very easy to use and with no command line

Until you have a problem.

> 9) can easyly dual boot with windows

If it's that great why do you still need windows - if you're able to
secure windows (following basic instructions) then you don't need Linux
at all.

> 10) most off all the ability to choose what you want

Same with windows.

> 11) did you know that microsoft has secret codes on its windows software so
> that you are spyed on via the NSA?(national security agency)

I see, you're one of those FUD people.

> 12)no DRM(digital rights management)

Not a problem for those that ethically use their PC.

> and many other things for you to discover.

Kernel updates that crash the OS, incompatibility with people that run
Windows and MS Office, lack of popular game support...

> 13)fully customizable to your needs

Same with Windows.

> windows over linux.
> 1)widely accepted
> 2)more apps
> 3)easyer than linux(while linux is not so hard)
> 4)more hardware support
[snip]
>
> REMEMBER PEOPLE IT'S ALL ABOUT CHOICE AND MICROSOFT DOES NOT GIVE YOU ANY

I find that I have plenty of choice and MS does not limit me in any
manner.

--

Leythos
- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)

 

[Frank]

Alias wrote:

> Carey Frisch [MVP] wrote:
>
>> People who advocate Open Sores Linux are truly miserable with their
>> choice.
>
>
> False.
>
>> It's obvious that they adhere to the old adage that "misery loves
>> company".
>
>
> False.
>
>> Every single arguement [sic] that [sic] offer to Windows users is
>> blantently [sic] false and misleading.
>
>
> False.
>
>> If you'll notice, there are over five (5) times the number of poor
>> linux users looking for help in the linux newsgroups vs. the
>> relativity low number of Windows users who post to this newsgroup.
>
>
> Extremely false.
>
>> Linux is for losers!
>
>
> So says the MVP with his head the furthest up MS' ass.
>
What a fukkin liar you are!
Frank

 

[ray]

On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 18:03:01 -0700, arkara wrote:

> i have been a windows user for many years until one day i found out about
> linux. many people when thay hear the word "linux" are terrified and tell me
> that it is very very dificult.
> this is wrong.
>
> linux over windows.
> 1) its free
> 2)its faster
> 3) its much more secure
> 4)has more bugfixes(people actualy work on open source)
> 5)many many applications
> 6) much of the hardware work out of the box
> 7)you can try it without loosing any data using live cds
> 8) linux has become very very easy to use and with no command line
> 9) can easyly dual boot with windows
> 10)most off all the ability to choose what you want
> 11) did you know that microsoft has secret codes on its windows software so
> that you are spyed on via the NSA?(national security agency)
> 12)no DRM(digital rights management)
> and many other things for you to discover.
> 13)fully customizable to your needs
>
> windows over linux.
> 1)widely accepted
> 2)more apps
> 3)easyer than linux(while linux is not so hard)

IMHO - not easier - just a little different.

> 4)more hardware support
>
> you can give linux a try. i dont say that is will work for you 100% but the
> chances are good
> some popular linux distributions with a large comunity are
>
> ubuntu: www.ubuntu.com
> pclinuxos: www.pclinuxos.com
> you can find more distributions on www.distrowatch.com
>
> most linux distributions have live cds.
> you can download the iso image of the cd and then burn it on a cd or dvd
> then boot from it (sometimes you must configure your bios in order to boot
> first from cd drive)
>
> DISCLAIMER:THIS POST IS NOT OVEREVANGELIZING LINUX BUT JUST POINTS OUT THAT
> IT IS A VIABLE SOLUTION TO WINDOWS. THERE CAN ALWAYS BE DIFICULTIES WHEN
> CHANGING AN OPERATING SYSTEM. EVERY USER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR HIS OWN SYSTEM
> AND DATA. AND BEFORE ANY ACTION DATA MUST BE BACKED UP.
>
> REMEMBER PEOPLE IT'S ALL ABOUT CHOICE AND MICROSOFT DOES NOT GIVE YOU ANY

 

[Alias]

Frank wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>
>> Carey Frisch [MVP] wrote:
>>
>>> People who advocate Open Sores Linux are truly miserable with their
>>> choice.
>>
>>
>> False.
>>
>>> It's obvious that they adhere to the old adage that "misery loves
>>> company".
>>
>>
>> False.
>>
>>> Every single arguement [sic] that [sic] offer to Windows users is
>>> blantently [sic] false and misleading.
>>
>>
>> False.
>>
>>> If you'll notice, there are over five (5) times the number of poor
>>> linux users looking for help in the linux newsgroups vs. the
>>> relativity low number of Windows users who post to this newsgroup.
>>
>>
>> Extremely false.
>>
>>> Linux is for losers!
>>
>>
>> So says the MVP with his head the furthest up MS' ass.
>>
> What a fukkin liar you are!
> Frank

Wow, what a convincing argument, Frank!

--
Alias
To email me, remove shoes

 

[Adam Albright]

On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:07:18 +0200, Alias <iamalias@shoesgmail.com>
wrote:

>>> So says the MVP with his head the furthest up MS' ass.
>>>
>> What a fukkin liar you are!
>> Frank
>
>Wow, what a convincing argument, Frank!

Frank has trouble tying his shoes by himself. He knows next to nothing
about computers or for that matter anything as he's proved over and
over.

Frank is so dumb, if eating in a restaurant and the waiter asked him
if he would like ice cream or pie for desert Frank would simply
respond yes, then scream and yell if the waiter didn't know what his
choice was by answering yes to a multiple choice question that
couldn't be answered by yes. That's Frank. Dumb as the day is long.

ROTFLMAO!

 

[HeyBub]

Carey Frisch [MVP] wrote:

> If you'll notice, there are over five (5) times the number of poor
> linux users looking for help in the linux newsgroups vs. the
> relativity low number of Windows users who post to this newsgroup.
> Linux is for losers!
>
>

How can that be? There are thousands, nay, tens of thousands more Windows
users than Linux. That would mean that Linux has five thousand, fifty
thousand, times more problems than Linux!

Now if you subtract out the number of Linux devotees who post here, that
reduces the number of posts regarding Windows by, oh, half, which, in turn,
doubles the ratio of dissatisfied users of Linux.

That's just horrible!

The government should outlaw things that cause as much suffering! Maybe
Hillary could devise a "National Linux-Care Plan" to ameloriate the pain?

 

[MICHAEL]

* Carey Frisch [MVP]:
> People who advocate Open Sores Linux are truly miserable with their choice.
> It's obvious that they adhere to the old adage that "misery loves company".
> Every single arguement that offer to Windows users is blantently false and
> misleading.
> If you'll notice, there are over five (5) times the number of poor linux
> users looking for help in the linux newsgroups vs. the relativity low number
> of Windows users who post to this newsgroup. Linux is for losers!

You have absolutely lost your mind, and I believe your
MVP status should be revoked. You are a disgrace to
the MVP community.


-Michael

 

[MICHAEL]

* Charlie Tame:
> Charlie Tame wrote:
>> Carey Frisch [MVP] wrote:
>>> People who advocate Open Sores Linux are truly miserable with their
>>> choice. It's obvious that they adhere to the old adage that "misery
>>> loves company". Every single arguement that offer to Windows users is
>>> blantently false and misleading.
>>> If you'll notice, there are over five (5) times the number of poor
>>> linux users looking for help in the linux newsgroups vs. the
>>> relativity low number of Windows users who post to this newsgroup.
>>> Linux is for losers!
>
> Here, read the comments under this ad idiot...
>
> http://astore.amazon.co.uk/webelements01/detail/B000KCIA3W
>
> No mention of other OS, just dissatisfaction with Vista and there are
> plenty more comments like it but you probably daren't look.
>
> MS needs to respond to these criticisms in a rational and thoughtful
> manner, not as you do, berate the user and then demonstrate your vast
> lack of technical expertise on any subject in particular.

> You are already the lowest form of life to be found hanging around here,
> but go ahead, make my day, I will be delighted to belittle you even
> further and it wont take much effort because as always you will do most
> of the work yourself.

Amen. I can't believe other MVPs have not spoken out about Carey's
decent into outright rudeness and enormous ignorance.

His MVP status needs to be revoked.


-Michael

 

[MICHAEL]

* MICHAEL:
> * Charlie Tame:
>> Charlie Tame wrote:
>>> Carey Frisch [MVP] wrote:
>>>> People who advocate Open Sores Linux are truly miserable with their
>>>> choice. It's obvious that they adhere to the old adage that "misery
>>>> loves company". Every single arguement that offer to Windows users is
>>>> blantently false and misleading.
>>>> If you'll notice, there are over five (5) times the number of poor
>>>> linux users looking for help in the linux newsgroups vs. the
>>>> relativity low number of Windows users who post to this newsgroup.
>>>> Linux is for losers!
>> Here, read the comments under this ad idiot...
>>
>> http://astore.amazon.co.uk/webelements01/detail/B000KCIA3W
>>
>> No mention of other OS, just dissatisfaction with Vista and there are
>> plenty more comments like it but you probably daren't look.
>>
>> MS needs to respond to these criticisms in a rational and thoughtful
>> manner, not as you do, berate the user and then demonstrate your vast
>> lack of technical expertise on any subject in particular.
>
>> You are already the lowest form of life to be found hanging around here,
>> but go ahead, make my day, I will be delighted to belittle you even
>> further and it wont take much effort because as always you will do most
>> of the work yourself.
>
> Amen. I can't believe other MVPs have not spoken out about Carey's
> *decent* into outright rudeness and enormous ignorance.

That should be *descent*..... there's nothing decent about MVP Carey Frisch.


-Michael

> His MVP status needs to be revoked.

 

[Adam Albright]

On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:32:38 -0500, "HeyBub" <heybub@gmail.com> wrote:

>Carey Frisch [MVP] wrote:
>
>> If you'll notice, there are over five (5) times the number of poor
>> linux users looking for help in the linux newsgroups vs. the
>> relativity low number of Windows users who post to this newsgroup.
>> Linux is for losers!
>>
>>
>
>How can that be? There are thousands, nay, tens of thousands more Windows
>users than Linux. That would mean that Linux has five thousand, fifty
>thousand, times more problems than Linux!
>
>Now if you subtract out the number of Linux devotees who post here, that
>reduces the number of posts regarding Windows by, oh, half, which, in turn,
>doubles the ratio of dissatisfied users of Linux.
>
>That's just horrible!
>
>The government should outlaw things that cause as much suffering! Maybe
>Hillary could devise a "National Linux-Care Plan" to ameloriate the pain?

Oh God, you seem to be one of those right wing morons besides being a
fanboy. Figures.

 

[Frank]

Adam Albright wrote:

> On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:07:18 +0200, Alias <iamalias@shoesgmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>>>So says the MVP with his head the furthest up MS' ass.
>>>>
>>>
>>>What a fukkin liar you are!
>>>Frank
>>
>>Wow, what a convincing argument, Frank!
>
>
> Frank has trouble tying his shoes by himself. He knows next to nothing
> about computers or for that matter anything as he's proved over and
> over.
>
> Frank is so dumb, if eating in a restaurant and the waiter asked him
> if he would like ice cream or pie for desert Frank would simply
> respond yes, then scream and yell if the waiter didn't know what his
> choice was by answering yes to a multiple choice question that
> couldn't be answered by yes. That's Frank. Dumb as the day is long.
>
> ROTFLMAO!
>

Fukkin drunk again adam?
Sober up loser.
Frank