Linux is not readly for prime time

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bill Yanaire
  • Start date Start date
DanS wrote:
> FAB <aliasis@sheep-fukker.com> wrote in
> news:#V8PB9a7IHA.4532@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl:
>
>
>>DanS wrote:
>>
>>
>>>FAB <aliasis@sheep-fukker.com> wrote in news:OYu0UQT7IHA.5164
>>>@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>DanS wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Frank <fb@nospam.com> wrote in news:g68eg8$86c$1@aioe.org:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>DanS wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Frank's claim that OSX doesn't cost less than Vista.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>Well that's not really true is it dan-o?
>>>>>>Now you're lying!
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Yes, it is true, and no I'm not lying. Look back at the thread.
>>>>
>>>>No, it's not true. You look it up, liar!
>>>
>>>
>>>OK, here's the msg ID: <Xns9ADAA67CA8653thisnthatadelphianet@
>>>85.214.90.236>
>>>
>>>Or, look for the thread that is entitled "Vista SUCKS", or this GG
>>>link:
>>>
>>>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.windows.vista.general/
>>>bro
>>>wse_thread/thread/d334fac51820f0df/38445ce8ab216fed?hl=en&lnk=st&q=#
>>>38445ce8ab216fed
>>>
>>>It plainly shows that OSX is less expensive than Vista.
>>>
>>>Of course, I'm just wasting my time with you anyway, as you'll never
>>>admit to anything, even things plain as day to everyone in the entire
>>>world except you.
>>
>>Your link doesn't work and you're a liar!
>>Go fukk yourself dan-o!
>
>
> Well learn how to handle wrapped url's. It works fine.
>
> Here, maybe this tiny url will work for you, you're used to tiny things.
>
> http://tinyurl.com/5s59sv
>
>
>
Seeing as how Apple charges for SP's and MS doesn't, you TOC is more
with Apple.
Sorry dan-o, but you lose!...LOL!
 
DanS wrote:
> FAB <aliasis@sheep-fukker.com> wrote in
> news:#V8PB9a7IHA.4532@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl:
>
>> DanS wrote:
>>
>>> FAB <aliasis@sheep-fukker.com> wrote in news:OYu0UQT7IHA.5164
>>> @TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl:
>>>
>>>
>>>> DanS wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Frank <fb@nospam.com> wrote in news:g68eg8$86c$1@aioe.org:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> DanS wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Frank's claim that OSX doesn't cost less than Vista.
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> Well that's not really true is it dan-o?
>>>>>> Now you're lying!
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, it is true, and no I'm not lying. Look back at the thread.
>>>> No, it's not true. You look it up, liar!
>>>
>>> OK, here's the msg ID: <Xns9ADAA67CA8653thisnthatadelphianet@
>>> 85.214.90.236>
>>>
>>> Or, look for the thread that is entitled "Vista SUCKS", or this GG
>>> link:
>>>
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.windows.vista.general/
>>> bro
>>> wse_thread/thread/d334fac51820f0df/38445ce8ab216fed?hl=en&lnk=st&q=#
>>> 38445ce8ab216fed
>>>
>>> It plainly shows that OSX is less expensive than Vista.
>>>
>>> Of course, I'm just wasting my time with you anyway, as you'll never
>>> admit to anything, even things plain as day to everyone in the entire
>>> world except you.
>> Your link doesn't work and you're a liar!
>> Go fukk yourself dan-o!
>
> Well learn how to handle wrapped url's. It works fine.
>
> Here, maybe this tiny url will work for you, you're used to tiny things.
>
> http://tinyurl.com/5s59sv
>
>
>

Frank, it's too weak to even waste a comeback on it. <g>
 
FAB <aliasis@sheep-fukker.com> wrote in news:uNL#fVe7IHA.1196
@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl:

>>>>
>>>>Or, look for the thread that is entitled "Vista SUCKS", or this GG
>>>>link:
>>>>
>>>>
http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.windows.vista.general/
>>>>bro
>>>>wse_thread/thread/d334fac51820f0df/38445ce8ab216fed?hl=en&lnk=st&q=#
>>>>38445ce8ab216fed
>>>>
>>>>It plainly shows that OSX is less expensive than Vista.
>>>>
>>>>Of course, I'm just wasting my time with you anyway, as you'll never
>>>>admit to anything, even things plain as day to everyone in the entire
>>>>world except you.
>>>
>>>Your link doesn't work and you're a liar!
>>>Go fukk yourself dan-o!
>>
>>
>> Well learn how to handle wrapped url's. It works fine.
>>
>> Here, maybe this tiny url will work for you, you're used to tiny
things.
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/5s59sv
>>
>>
>>
> Seeing as how Apple charges for SP's and MS doesn't, you TOC is more
> with Apple.
> Sorry dan-o, but you lose!...LOL!
>

Nothing like changing requirements throughout your argument.

So then let's add replacing hardware that is not Vista compatible as a
part of the cost of ownership of Vista. External hardware, such as
printers or scanners.

Even with an extra charge, the 5-pack license is still less expensive
that Vista.

And that's TCO not TOC. And it's worth a mention you are talking about
service packs, which for Apple *usually* include new features. Any
security updates and component updates are still free.
 
DanS wrote:
>
> Nothing like changing requirements throughout your argument.
>

We'll seeing that statement out of you with the word *argument* or you
could have used the word *debate* too tells me that you are one crazy
SOB, and you'll look for anything so that you can start your lip drivel
service. Frank or anyone else will do well to just keep their distance
from you as you're like a Black Hole.
 
Alias, the sheep-fukkin lying linux troll wrote:

------------------------------------

alias trying to rationalize his being here.

How about we send this vile, disgusting, degrading post of yours to your
ISP, huh?

"Your wife asked me if I would stroke her but I declined as I don't do
dogs. Then she screamed that I am a Linux loving commie atheist loser
and went running out into the street naked repeating that over and over
again. You know, like you do on this newsgroup.

Have you stopped fuçking your daughter yet ... LOL!

Alias"

Well alias...what do you think? The pot calling the kettle black, huh?
You seem to be just another uneducated big mouth POS lying linux loser.
Best you just STFU!
 
fb wrote:
> Alias, the sheep-fukkin lying linux troll wrote:
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> alias trying to rationalize his being here.
>
> How about we send this vile, disgusting, degrading post of yours to your
> ISP, huh?
>
> "Your wife asked me if I would stroke her but I declined as I don't do
> dogs. Then she screamed that I am a Linux loving commie atheist loser
> and went running out into the street naked repeating that over and over
> again. You know, like you do on this newsgroup.
>
> Have you stopped fuçking your daughter yet ... LOL!
>
> Alias"
>
> Well alias...what do you think? The pot calling the kettle black, huh?
> You seem to be just another uneducated big mouth POS lying linux loser.
> Best you just STFU!
>

This is coming from St. Linux Alias? Please, say it is not so that St.
Linux Alias did this. It's just un-believable that St. Linux Alias would
do something this. It is shameful behavior - just shameful for a Linux
spokesperson.
 
Kicking Albright wrote:

> fb wrote:
>
>> Alias, the sheep-fukkin lying linux troll wrote:
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> alias trying to rationalize his being here.
>>
>> How about we send this vile, disgusting, degrading post of yours to
>> your ISP, huh?
>>
>> "Your wife asked me if I would stroke her but I declined as I don't do
>> dogs. Then she screamed that I am a Linux loving commie atheist loser
>> and went running out into the street naked repeating that over and over
>> again. You know, like you do on this newsgroup.
>>
>> Have you stopped fuçking your daughter yet ... LOL!
>>
>> Alias"
>>
>> Well alias...what do you think? The pot calling the kettle black, huh?
>> You seem to be just another uneducated big mouth POS lying linux loser.
>> Best you just STFU!
>>
>
> This is coming from St. Linux Alias? Please, say it is not so that St.
> Linux Alias did this. It's just un-believable that St. Linux Alias would
> do something this. It is shameful behavior - just shameful for a Linux
> spokesperson.
>

Yep! That is the lying linux loser all right! His is so lost in his
lying crap he can't remember which lie he last told.
He's really sick in the head.
 
Back
Top