Linux Bulletproof ? Better read this if you think so.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jasper
  • Start date Start date
GorkusPuss wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>> GorkusPuss wrote:
>>>
>>> We're still awaiting the proof of millions dumping Windows for Ubuntu
>>> you've stated. Do you think that if it were the case something like
>>> "Ubuntu Now 2.5 Downloads +" would be stated on their web page, on
>>> their home page. Let us investigate for you, rather than wait for you
>>> to do so, back in 5 min off to http://www.ubuntu.com/ ......
>>>
>>> ... back.
>>>
>>> Nah....! Not unless, no forbid that would never be the case, the
>>> Ubuntu website is not credible documentation. Guess the background
>>> colour of their website is to match that colour of what comes out
>>> their advocates mouths.
>>>
>>> I can remember the Mozilla Firefox website once stating something
>>> like "Over 2 million downloads", can't remember the specific number.
>>> That is what happens when a competitor to MS, whatever the product,
>>> blasts for the whole world to see when they get the millions of
>>> downloads.
>>>
>>> You bring much humour and joy to the world Alias, keep it up.
>>>
>>>
>>> - GorkusPuss
>>
>> Another fanboy who can only insult, trot out a straw man and offer no
>> proof. Ho hum.
>>
>> Alias
>
> Oh poor pooh pooh Alias still no proof, still can't muster anything
> other than the loser squeal. Please mark future posts as OT as they are
> in reference to your Oedipal situation, I'm not your mummy, cry your
> Ubuntu junk elsewhere.
>
> - GorkusPuss

More insults? How strange. Who could imagine?

Alias
 
Alias wrote:

> dennis@home wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> "Alias" <iamalias@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:g1bdh0$3qh$2@aioe.org...
>>
>>> dennis@home wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:g1aarl$bs9$1@aioe.org...
>>>>
>>>>> No explanation of why the patch didn't fix it and, of course, no
>>>>> credible documentation, only "I'm smarter and more knowledgeable
>>>>> than you".
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think you have proven everyone in this group fits that description.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I don't need a repeat performance from you Dennis, but proof,
>>> something you obviously can't provide.
>>
>>
>> It's obvious to anyone that knows anything about computer security and
>> you /have/ been pointed to documentation, but you just prove what I
>> said..
>> Either too stupid or just plain malicious.
>> Either way makes you a waste of space for everyone else when it comes
>> to computers.
>> Even the Ubuntu crowd think you are stupid.
>> c.o.l.a would be the best place for you, it is full of people as
>> stupid as you.
>
>
> So what does Dennis do? He repeats himself and, again, only provides
> unfounded lies and no proof for his assertions.
>
> Alias
As usual, you have a hard time dealing with the truth.
Figures.
Frank
 
Alias wrote:

> GorkusPuss wrote:
>
>> Alias wrote:
>>
>>> GorkusPuss wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> We're still awaiting the proof of millions dumping Windows for
>>>> Ubuntu you've stated. Do you think that if it were the case
>>>> something like "Ubuntu Now 2.5 Downloads +" would be stated on their
>>>> web page, on their home page. Let us investigate for you, rather
>>>> than wait for you to do so, back in 5 min off to
>>>> http://www.ubuntu.com/ ......
>>>>
>>>> ... back.
>>>>
>>>> Nah....! Not unless, no forbid that would never be the case, the
>>>> Ubuntu website is not credible documentation. Guess the background
>>>> colour of their website is to match that colour of what comes out
>>>> their advocates mouths.
>>>>
>>>> I can remember the Mozilla Firefox website once stating something
>>>> like "Over 2 million downloads", can't remember the specific number.
>>>> That is what happens when a competitor to MS, whatever the product,
>>>> blasts for the whole world to see when they get the millions of
>>>> downloads.
>>>>
>>>> You bring much humour and joy to the world Alias, keep it up.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> - GorkusPuss
>>>
>>>
>>> Another fanboy who can only insult, trot out a straw man and offer no
>>> proof. Ho hum.
>>>
>>> Alias
>>
>>
>> Oh poor pooh pooh Alias still no proof, still can't muster anything
>> other than the loser squeal. Please mark future posts as OT as they
>> are in reference to your Oedipal situation, I'm not your mummy, cry
>> your Ubuntu junk elsewhere.
>>
>> - GorkusPuss
>
>
> More insults? How strange. Who could imagine?
>
> Alias
hehehe...I love seeing everyone here kick your arrogant and stupid ass
all over the ng!...LOL!
Frank
 
A friend with weed is a friend indeed.


--
Hobbes
Tiger Extraordinaire/ TDTK, QZ,MissAK
"Alias" <iamalias@removegmail.com> wrote in message
news:g1cb5h$rtb$3@aioe.org...
> Jasper wrote:
>> http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=11869
>>
>>
>>
>
> A friend of mine has Feisty and the updates asked him if wanted to
> regenerate the program keys created by the OpenSSL library. He clicked on
> yes, problem solved.
>
> Alias
>
 
"Alias" <iamalias@removegmail.com> wrote in message
news:g1cb5h$rtb$3@aioe.org...
> Jasper wrote:
>> http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=11869
>>
>>
>>
>
> A friend of mine has Feisty and the updates asked him if wanted to
> regenerate the program keys created by the OpenSSL library. He clicked on
> yes, problem solved.
>
> Alias

Still lying I see.
 
"Alias" <iamalias@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
news:g1bfrt$g4p$1@aioe.org...
> dennis@home wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Alias" <iamalias@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:g1bdh0$3qh$2@aioe.org...
>>> dennis@home wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:g1aarl$bs9$1@aioe.org...
>>>>
>>>>> No explanation of why the patch didn't fix it and, of course, no
>>>>> credible documentation, only "I'm smarter and more knowledgeable than
>>>>> you".
>>>>
>>>> I think you have proven everyone in this group fits that description.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I don't need a repeat performance from you Dennis, but proof, something
>>> you obviously can't provide.
>>
>> It's obvious to anyone that knows anything about computer security and
>> you /have/ been pointed to documentation, but you just prove what I
>> said..
>> Either too stupid or just plain malicious.
>> Either way makes you a waste of space for everyone else when it comes to
>> computers.
>> Even the Ubuntu crowd think you are stupid.
>> c.o.l.a would be the best place for you, it is full of people as stupid
>> as you.
>
> So what does Dennis do? He repeats himself and, again, only provides
> unfounded lies and no proof for his assertions.

Moron, read this and think for a change, I know its hard for some to think
but at least try.

http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-612-2

Remember that that doesn't fix any machines out there that may have been
hacked before the weak keys were removed.
Just as well an expert like you knows that so you don't come here spouting
of stupid stuff.
 
dennis@home wrote:
>
>
> "Alias" <iamalias@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
> news:g1bfrt$g4p$1@aioe.org...
>> dennis@home wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> "Alias" <iamalias@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:g1bdh0$3qh$2@aioe.org...
>>>> dennis@home wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:g1aarl$bs9$1@aioe.org...
>>>>>
>>>>>> No explanation of why the patch didn't fix it and, of course, no
>>>>>> credible documentation, only "I'm smarter and more knowledgeable
>>>>>> than you".
>>>>>
>>>>> I think you have proven everyone in this group fits that description.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't need a repeat performance from you Dennis, but proof,
>>>> something you obviously can't provide.
>>>
>>> It's obvious to anyone that knows anything about computer security
>>> and you /have/ been pointed to documentation, but you just prove what
>>> I said..
>>> Either too stupid or just plain malicious.
>>> Either way makes you a waste of space for everyone else when it comes
>>> to computers.
>>> Even the Ubuntu crowd think you are stupid.
>>> c.o.l.a would be the best place for you, it is full of people as
>>> stupid as you.
>>
>> So what does Dennis do? He repeats himself and, again, only provides
>> unfounded lies and no proof for his assertions.
>
> Moron, read this and think for a change, I know its hard for some to
> think but at least try.
>
> http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-612-2
>
> Remember that that doesn't fix any machines out there that may have been
> hacked before the weak keys were removed.
> Just as well an expert like you knows that so you don't come here
> spouting of stupid stuff.

It's been patched. Not one report of one hack unless you can document
one (as if). You must have gotten a hard on when you read that and came
running here to harp on ONE vulnerability that has not only been
patched, the patch asks you if you want to fix all the keys with one
click. If Windows becomes infected, usually the only way to really know
it isn't infected anymore is to reinstall Windows, a PIA compared to
reinstalling Ubuntu.

Alias
 
dennis@home wrote:
>
>
> "Alias" <iamalias@removegmail.com> wrote in message
> news:g1cb5h$rtb$3@aioe.org...
>> Jasper wrote:
>>> http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=11869
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> A friend of mine has Feisty and the updates asked him if wanted to
>> regenerate the program keys created by the OpenSSL library. He clicked
>> on yes, problem solved.
>>
>> Alias
>
> Still lying I see.

You were party to the conversation my friend and I had? Pray tell, was
it by phone, email, IM or in person? I have Feisty on another machine
and it did the same for me.

Alias
 
Alias wrote:
> dennis@home wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> "Alias" <iamalias@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:g1bfrt$g4p$1@aioe.org...
>>
>>> dennis@home wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:g1bdh0$3qh$2@aioe.org...
>>>>
>>>>> dennis@home wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:g1aarl$bs9$1@aioe.org...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No explanation of why the patch didn't fix it and, of course, no
>>>>>>> credible documentation, only "I'm smarter and more knowledgeable
>>>>>>> than you".
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think you have proven everyone in this group fits that description.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't need a repeat performance from you Dennis, but proof,
>>>>> something you obviously can't provide.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It's obvious to anyone that knows anything about computer security
>>>> and you /have/ been pointed to documentation, but you just prove
>>>> what I said..
>>>> Either too stupid or just plain malicious.
>>>> Either way makes you a waste of space for everyone else when it
>>>> comes to computers.
>>>> Even the Ubuntu crowd think you are stupid.
>>>> c.o.l.a would be the best place for you, it is full of people as
>>>> stupid as you.
>>>
>>>
>>> So what does Dennis do? He repeats himself and, again, only provides
>>> unfounded lies and no proof for his assertions.
>>
>>
>> Moron, read this and think for a change, I know its hard for some to
>> think but at least try.
>>
>> http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-612-2
>>
>> Remember that that doesn't fix any machines out there that may have
>> been hacked before the weak keys were removed.
>> Just as well an expert like you knows that so you don't come here
>> spouting of stupid stuff.
>
>
> It's been patched. Not one report of one hack unless you can document
> one (as if). You must have gotten a hard on when you read that and came
> running here to harp on ONE vulnerability that has not only been
> patched, the patch asks you if you want to fix all the keys with one
> click. If Windows becomes infected, usually the only way to really know
> it isn't infected anymore is to reinstall Windows, a PIA compared to
> reinstalling Ubuntu.
>
> Alias
I bet your upyurbuttoo box is infected and you don't have a clue!...LOL!
Frank
 
"measekite" <inkystinky@oem.com> wrote in message
news:hVMZj.1672$co7.1500@nlpi066.nbdc.sbc.com...
>
>
> Frank wrote:
>> Alias wrote:
>>
>>> Jasper wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Gumby" <gumby@is.cool> wrote in message
>>>> news:H4FZj.289605$pM4.48519@pd7urf1no...
>>>>
>>>>> "Jasper" <Jasper@faraway.ca> wrote in news:em7PfrQvIHA.4876
>>>>> @TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl:
>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=11869
>>>>>
>>>>> Yea, anyone who thinks any OS is secure is a moron.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> There is one individual on this NG that has stated this more than once
>>>> that linux is "Bulletproof".
>>>>
>>>
>>> compared to Windows ... was the entire quote. Care to change your
>>> opinion now?
>>>
>>> Alias
>>
>> Of course not. And you
>
>> proly
> Now what is proly
>> have an infected urbuttoo and don't even know it.
>> I bet you're a fukkin bot!...LOL!
>> Frank

probably
 
"Spaceman" <spaceman@realspaceman.com> wrote in message
news:O8wbnrTvIHA.1768@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>
> "Canuck57" <dave8762@nospam-please.com> wrote in message
> news:riJZj.159904$rd2.94968@pd7urf3no...
>> I will admit, it isn't bullet proof.
>>
>> Just a nice 30:1 better track record.
>
> 30:1 for what stats of users trying to actually do the breaking
> in/breaking?
>
> *****
> example:
> a group of 10000 people attempt to break "The Joe Company" product
> a group of 10 people attempt to break "The Shmoe Company" product.
>
> 30 people broke the Joe product
> 1 broke the Shmoe product..
> *****
> Cool.
> so.
> 30:1
> like you say means Scmoe product is better because less people can break
> it.
> LOL
> In actuallity, the 30 had a greater chance to be such a number anyway,
> Didn't it?
> so Please...
> show some real stats so I can actually make up my mind about Windows vs
> Linux
> :)
>
> What would the ratio be if the amount of people that are trying
> to break into MS were the same for Linux?
> Do you actually think that Linux is as solid if such occured?
> I don't.
> Of course that is my opinion and it would kinda be cool to find out such,
> if it could ever happen at all.

Haven't got a clue.

But just like bullies, evil hackers will pick on the weakest link.
MS-Windows.
 
"Alias" <iamalias@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
news:g1csc2$upg$2@aioe.org...
> dennis@home wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Alias" <iamalias@removegmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:g1cb5h$rtb$3@aioe.org...
>>> Jasper wrote:
>>>> http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=11869
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> A friend of mine has Feisty and the updates asked him if wanted to
>>> regenerate the program keys created by the OpenSSL library. He clicked
>>> on yes, problem solved.
>>>
>>> Alias
>>
>> Still lying I see.
>
> You were party to the conversation my friend and I had? Pray tell, was it
> by phone, email, IM or in person? I have Feisty on another machine and it
> did the same for me.

I don't need to know what your friend said, you said click, problem solved
which *is* a lie.
You are so stupid you can't understand the problem let alone the solution.

>
> Alias
 
dennis@home wrote:
>
>
> "Alias" <iamalias@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
> news:g1csc2$upg$2@aioe.org...
>> dennis@home wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> "Alias" <iamalias@removegmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:g1cb5h$rtb$3@aioe.org...
>>>> Jasper wrote:
>>>>> http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=11869
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> A friend of mine has Feisty and the updates asked him if wanted to
>>>> regenerate the program keys created by the OpenSSL library. He
>>>> clicked on yes, problem solved.
>>>>
>>>> Alias
>>>
>>> Still lying I see.
>>
>> You were party to the conversation my friend and I had? Pray tell, was
>> it by phone, email, IM or in person? I have Feisty on another machine
>> and it did the same for me.
>
> I don't need to know what your friend said, you said click, problem
> solved which *is* a lie.
> You are so stupid you can't understand the problem let alone the solution.
>

My friend did not lie, nor did I. When I did it on MY machine that's
running Feisty, a pop up came up during the new updates install and
asked if I wanted to regenerate all the keys. To accept, it was ONE
click. Have you done it? No? Still have the hard on for that ONE
vulnerability that was quickly patched when discovered or have you had
your cigarette yet and come to your senses?

Now, how many vulnerabilities are patched in Windows a month or more
later after discovery? There's a reason that every second Wednesday of
the month is called "exploit Wednesday", now isn't there?

Alias
 
"::- Alias- ::" <iamalias@TAKETHISOUTgmail.com> wrote in message
news:u3XniQ0vIHA.4848@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> dennis@home wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Alias" <iamalias@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:g1csc2$upg$2@aioe.org...
>>> dennis@home wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@removegmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:g1cb5h$rtb$3@aioe.org...
>>>>> Jasper wrote:
>>>>>> http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=11869
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> A friend of mine has Feisty and the updates asked him if wanted to
>>>>> regenerate the program keys created by the OpenSSL library. He clicked
>>>>> on yes, problem solved.
>>>>>
>>>>> Alias
>>>>
>>>> Still lying I see.
>>>
>>> You were party to the conversation my friend and I had? Pray tell, was
>>> it by phone, email, IM or in person? I have Feisty on another machine
>>> and it did the same for me.
>>
>> I don't need to know what your friend said, you said click, problem
>> solved which *is* a lie.
>> You are so stupid you can't understand the problem let alone the
>> solution.
>>
>
> My friend did not lie, nor did I.

Yes you did.
You know the patch doesn't fix the problem therefore you lied when you said
it did.

> When I did it on MY machine that's running Feisty, a pop up came up during
> the new updates install and asked if I wanted to regenerate all the keys.
> To accept, it was ONE click. Have you done it? No? Still have the hard on
> for that ONE vulnerability that was quickly patched when discovered or
> have you had your cigarette yet and come to your senses?
>
> Now, how many vulnerabilities are patched in Windows a month or more later
> after discovery? There's a reason that every second Wednesday of the month
> is called "exploit Wednesday", now isn't there?

Who cares, this is about your lies and incompetence, you make claims that
are lies!
You ignore the truth.
You are really stupid.
If every linux user were as stupid as you every linux machine would have
been hacked by now.

>
> Alias
 
dennis@home wrote:
>
>
> "::- Alias- ::" <iamalias@TAKETHISOUTgmail.com> wrote in message
> news:u3XniQ0vIHA.4848@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>> dennis@home wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> "Alias" <iamalias@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:g1csc2$upg$2@aioe.org...
>>>> dennis@home wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@removegmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:g1cb5h$rtb$3@aioe.org...
>>>>>> Jasper wrote:
>>>>>>> http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=11869
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A friend of mine has Feisty and the updates asked him if wanted to
>>>>>> regenerate the program keys created by the OpenSSL library. He
>>>>>> clicked on yes, problem solved.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>
>>>>> Still lying I see.
>>>>
>>>> You were party to the conversation my friend and I had? Pray tell,
>>>> was it by phone, email, IM or in person? I have Feisty on another
>>>> machine and it did the same for me.
>>>
>>> I don't need to know what your friend said, you said click, problem
>>> solved which *is* a lie.
>>> You are so stupid you can't understand the problem let alone the
>>> solution.
>>>
>>
>> My friend did not lie, nor did I.
>
> Yes you did.
> You know the patch doesn't fix the problem therefore you lied when you
> said it did.
>
>> When I did it on MY machine that's running Feisty, a pop up came up
>> during the new updates install and asked if I wanted to regenerate all
>> the keys. To accept, it was ONE click. Have you done it? No? Still
>> have the hard on for that ONE vulnerability that was quickly patched
>> when discovered or have you had your cigarette yet and come to your
>> senses?
>>
>> Now, how many vulnerabilities are patched in Windows a month or more
>> later after discovery? There's a reason that every second Wednesday of
>> the month is called "exploit Wednesday", now isn't there?
>
> Who cares, this is about your lies and incompetence, you make claims
> that are lies!
> You ignore the truth.
> You are really stupid.
> If every linux user were as stupid as you every linux machine would have
> been hacked by now.
>
>>
>> Alias
>

The patch was offered as was the option to regenerate the keys. Having a
reading comprehension problem? Being as you don't run Feisty, you
wouldn't know but that doesn't stop you from repeating the same, tired
refrain.

Alias
 
Alias wrote:

> dennis@home wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> "::- Alias- ::" <iamalias@TAKETHISOUTgmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:u3XniQ0vIHA.4848@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>
>>> dennis@home wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:g1csc2$upg$2@aioe.org...
>>>>
>>>>> dennis@home wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@removegmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:g1cb5h$rtb$3@aioe.org...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jasper wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=11869
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A friend of mine has Feisty and the updates asked him if wanted
>>>>>>> to regenerate the program keys created by the OpenSSL library. He
>>>>>>> clicked on yes, problem solved.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Still lying I see.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You were party to the conversation my friend and I had? Pray tell,
>>>>> was it by phone, email, IM or in person? I have Feisty on another
>>>>> machine and it did the same for me.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't need to know what your friend said, you said click, problem
>>>> solved which *is* a lie.
>>>> You are so stupid you can't understand the problem let alone the
>>>> solution.
>>>>
>>>
>>> My friend did not lie, nor did I.
>>
>>
>> Yes you did.
>> You know the patch doesn't fix the problem therefore you lied when you
>> said it did.
>>
>>> When I did it on MY machine that's running Feisty, a pop up came up
>>> during the new updates install and asked if I wanted to regenerate
>>> all the keys. To accept, it was ONE click. Have you done it? No?
>>> Still have the hard on for that ONE vulnerability that was quickly
>>> patched when discovered or have you had your cigarette yet and come
>>> to your senses?
>>>
>>> Now, how many vulnerabilities are patched in Windows a month or more
>>> later after discovery? There's a reason that every second Wednesday
>>> of the month is called "exploit Wednesday", now isn't there?
>>
>>
>> Who cares, this is about your lies and incompetence, you make claims
>> that are lies!
>> You ignore the truth.
>> You are really stupid.
>> If every linux user were as stupid as you every linux machine would
>> have been hacked by now.
>>
>>>
>>> Alias
>>
>>
>
> The patch was offered as was the option to regenerate the keys. Having a
> reading comprehension problem? Being as you don't run Feisty, you
> wouldn't know but that doesn't stop you from repeating the same, tired
> refrain.
>
> Alias
You've proly got an infected machine and don't even know it!...LOL!
Frank
 
"Alias" <iamalias@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
news:g1em47$h46$1@aioe.org...
> dennis@home wrote:
>>
>>
>> "::- Alias- ::" <iamalias@TAKETHISOUTgmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:u3XniQ0vIHA.4848@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>> dennis@home wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:g1csc2$upg$2@aioe.org...
>>>>> dennis@home wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@removegmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:g1cb5h$rtb$3@aioe.org...
>>>>>>> Jasper wrote:
>>>>>>>> http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=11869
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A friend of mine has Feisty and the updates asked him if wanted to
>>>>>>> regenerate the program keys created by the OpenSSL library. He
>>>>>>> clicked on yes, problem solved.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Still lying I see.
>>>>>
>>>>> You were party to the conversation my friend and I had? Pray tell, was
>>>>> it by phone, email, IM or in person? I have Feisty on another machine
>>>>> and it did the same for me.
>>>>
>>>> I don't need to know what your friend said, you said click, problem
>>>> solved which *is* a lie.
>>>> You are so stupid you can't understand the problem let alone the
>>>> solution.
>>>>
>>>
>>> My friend did not lie, nor did I.
>>
>> Yes you did.
>> You know the patch doesn't fix the problem therefore you lied when you
>> said it did.
>>
>>> When I did it on MY machine that's running Feisty, a pop up came up
>>> during the new updates install and asked if I wanted to regenerate all
>>> the keys. To accept, it was ONE click. Have you done it? No? Still have
>>> the hard on for that ONE vulnerability that was quickly patched when
>>> discovered or have you had your cigarette yet and come to your senses?
>>>
>>> Now, how many vulnerabilities are patched in Windows a month or more
>>> later after discovery? There's a reason that every second Wednesday of
>>> the month is called "exploit Wednesday", now isn't there?
>>
>> Who cares, this is about your lies and incompetence, you make claims that
>> are lies!
>> You ignore the truth.
>> You are really stupid.
>> If every linux user were as stupid as you every linux machine would have
>> been hacked by now.
>>
>>>
>>> Alias
>>
>
> The patch was offered as was the option to regenerate the keys. Having a
> reading comprehension problem? Being as you don't run Feisty, you wouldn't
> know but that doesn't stop you from repeating the same, tired refrain.

Still too stupid to understand I see!
Go back to your computer and believe you are safe, nobody really cares what
happens to someone as stupid as you, just stop lying to others and getting
them into a mess.

>
> Alias
 
dennis@home wrote:
>
>
> "Alias" <iamalias@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
> news:g1em47$h46$1@aioe.org...
>> dennis@home wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> "::- Alias- ::" <iamalias@TAKETHISOUTgmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:u3XniQ0vIHA.4848@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>> dennis@home wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:g1csc2$upg$2@aioe.org...
>>>>>> dennis@home wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@removegmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:g1cb5h$rtb$3@aioe.org...
>>>>>>>> Jasper wrote:
>>>>>>>>> http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=11869
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A friend of mine has Feisty and the updates asked him if wanted
>>>>>>>> to regenerate the program keys created by the OpenSSL library.
>>>>>>>> He clicked on yes, problem solved.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Still lying I see.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You were party to the conversation my friend and I had? Pray tell,
>>>>>> was it by phone, email, IM or in person? I have Feisty on another
>>>>>> machine and it did the same for me.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't need to know what your friend said, you said click, problem
>>>>> solved which *is* a lie.
>>>>> You are so stupid you can't understand the problem let alone the
>>>>> solution.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> My friend did not lie, nor did I.
>>>
>>> Yes you did.
>>> You know the patch doesn't fix the problem therefore you lied when
>>> you said it did.
>>>
>>>> When I did it on MY machine that's running Feisty, a pop up came up
>>>> during the new updates install and asked if I wanted to regenerate
>>>> all the keys. To accept, it was ONE click. Have you done it? No?
>>>> Still have the hard on for that ONE vulnerability that was quickly
>>>> patched when discovered or have you had your cigarette yet and come
>>>> to your senses?
>>>>
>>>> Now, how many vulnerabilities are patched in Windows a month or more
>>>> later after discovery? There's a reason that every second Wednesday
>>>> of the month is called "exploit Wednesday", now isn't there?
>>>
>>> Who cares, this is about your lies and incompetence, you make claims
>>> that are lies!
>>> You ignore the truth.
>>> You are really stupid.
>>> If every linux user were as stupid as you every linux machine would
>>> have been hacked by now.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Alias
>>>
>>
>> The patch was offered as was the option to regenerate the keys. Having
>> a reading comprehension problem? Being as you don't run Feisty, you
>> wouldn't know but that doesn't stop you from repeating the same, tired
>> refrain.
>
> Still too stupid to understand I see!
> Go back to your computer and believe you are safe, nobody really cares
> what happens to someone as stupid as you, just stop lying to others and
> getting them into a mess.
>

When all else fails, Dennis resorts to unfounded insults. Ho hum. I am
not lying YOU are.

Alias
 
"Alias" <iamalias@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
news:g1eoqi$r8j$1@aioe.org...
> dennis@home wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Alias" <iamalias@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:g1em47$h46$1@aioe.org...
>>> dennis@home wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "::- Alias- ::" <iamalias@TAKETHISOUTgmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:u3XniQ0vIHA.4848@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>>> dennis@home wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:g1csc2$upg$2@aioe.org...
>>>>>>> dennis@home wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@removegmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:g1cb5h$rtb$3@aioe.org...
>>>>>>>>> Jasper wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=11869
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> A friend of mine has Feisty and the updates asked him if wanted to
>>>>>>>>> regenerate the program keys created by the OpenSSL library. He
>>>>>>>>> clicked on yes, problem solved.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Still lying I see.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You were party to the conversation my friend and I had? Pray tell,
>>>>>>> was it by phone, email, IM or in person? I have Feisty on another
>>>>>>> machine and it did the same for me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't need to know what your friend said, you said click, problem
>>>>>> solved which *is* a lie.
>>>>>> You are so stupid you can't understand the problem let alone the
>>>>>> solution.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> My friend did not lie, nor did I.
>>>>
>>>> Yes you did.
>>>> You know the patch doesn't fix the problem therefore you lied when you
>>>> said it did.
>>>>
>>>>> When I did it on MY machine that's running Feisty, a pop up came up
>>>>> during the new updates install and asked if I wanted to regenerate all
>>>>> the keys. To accept, it was ONE click. Have you done it? No? Still
>>>>> have the hard on for that ONE vulnerability that was quickly patched
>>>>> when discovered or have you had your cigarette yet and come to your
>>>>> senses?
>>>>>
>>>>> Now, how many vulnerabilities are patched in Windows a month or more
>>>>> later after discovery? There's a reason that every second Wednesday of
>>>>> the month is called "exploit Wednesday", now isn't there?
>>>>
>>>> Who cares, this is about your lies and incompetence, you make claims
>>>> that are lies!
>>>> You ignore the truth.
>>>> You are really stupid.
>>>> If every linux user were as stupid as you every linux machine would
>>>> have been hacked by now.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Alias
>>>>
>>>
>>> The patch was offered as was the option to regenerate the keys. Having a
>>> reading comprehension problem? Being as you don't run Feisty, you
>>> wouldn't know but that doesn't stop you from repeating the same, tired
>>> refrain.
>>
>> Still too stupid to understand I see!
>> Go back to your computer and believe you are safe, nobody really cares
>> what happens to someone as stupid as you, just stop lying to others and
>> getting them into a mess.
>>
>
> When all else fails, Dennis resorts to unfounded insults. Ho hum. I am not
> lying YOU are.
>
> Alias

Just carry on saying things that make you look more stupid.
 
Back
Top