My take on this guys is before starting on the tech journey, I first put in the time and effort to learn the theory part of it by studying the A+ course from cover to cover and did the same with web design and development, I just never bothered to take the exams to get the certifications although I do see the advantages of having certifications. Thing is, it is my opinion that no amount of certifications can match experience and efficiency, how else would you explain people who come to me after having taken their machines to Staples, Best Buy and GeekSquad e.t.c only to spend a few hundred dollars and not get their machines properly fixed. I have solved many pc problems in those situations from the help here and on the net.
The way I see it, being a good tech means being experienced and efficient above everything else, as an example, I spend a few hours tops trying everything I know on a problem I haven't encountered before and if that doesn't solve it I immediately go to google first then when that doesn't work I go to the forums and I post the same questions on different forums hoping to get the help from someone or somewhere as quickly as possible. Now does that make me a bad tech because I can't solve the problem off of my own knowledge and experience? If you as a Tech were the average customer, who would you take your machine to, the certified tech who would spend a week trying to fix a problem on his own or would you take it to an apprentice like myself who will find a way to get you machine repaired in a day or two?
There is a reason why Dr. House is my favorite tech show because that is who I am and what I believe in, you are presented with a problem you can't solve on your own first then you go seek help from whatever sources or from whoever can help you find that solution, I'd like to think that is why a lot of people who come to me show me their appreciation because I will tell anyone "I don't know everything but I will find a way to solve your problem, that you can count on!"