Down Memory Lane

  • Thread starter Thread starter Adam Albright
  • Start date Start date
On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 14:06:55 -0700 (PDT), Bill Yanaire
<BillYanaire@gmail.com> wrote:

>> If the dope replies, it ought to be good.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>I could give a rats ass.

Again you show off your limited intelligence. If your response is "I
could give a rat's ass" that means literally you at least WOULD be
willing to give the value of some rat's ass, whatever that might be
worth, since you just said as much.

The correct phrase would be 'I couldn't give a rat's ass' which would
mean your response was you didn't even care as much as whatever some
rat's ass was worth.

Don't worry dummy, this is a common grammatical error often seen when
some dope says "I could care less" which again implies he COULD care
less, because again, he just said so. The correct term is "I couldn't
care less" meaning he's already reached his limit of caring.

You're welcome.

I hope you appreciate me trying to help educate you. You'll obviously
be a tough student to teach though. I'm up to the challenge.

Of course we all know Yanaire is hot as pistil, me again showing him
up and illustrating again what a dope he actually is.
 
"upyurbuttoo" <upyurbuttoo@upyurbuttoo.com> wrote in message
news:OYfJDikxIHA.4952@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>
> "Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message
> news:38lb441c831j3cjbh6pt4t4er5gg61f2m2@4ax.com...
>>I thought it would be fun to revisit one of my first posts to this
>> newsgroup back in February of 2007. It rang true then, it even rings
>> more true now.
>>
>> Here it is:
>>
>> The main problem with ALL Microsoft "support" groups is they are
>> infested with way too many Microsoft butt kissers (ie MVP's) that
>> simply seem unable to give objective advice and generally color their
>> comments to favor Microsoft decisions no matter what. I find it
>> amusing, but also misleading, harmful and counterproductive. :-)
>>
>> The reality is Vista follows a long line of previous Windows releases
>> that also were buggy, not tested well enough under real world
>> conditions, is overpriced, lacks imagination, contains flawed,
>> crippled or broken features, removes items that were hinted at being
>> included in beta releases or shifts wanted features to the most
>> expensive version and perhaps the worse thing, leaves bugs that were
>> reported in earlier versions of Windows with Vista adding many new
>> ones.
>>
>> In other words, typical Microsoft software. Overpriced, not thoroughly
>> tested, not ready for prime time and sure to frustrate millions with
>> useless things like UAC that mostly gets in the way rather then
>> helping or offering any real security. Add in a useless Vista Upgrade
>> Advisor that lulls users into falsely thinking their system is ready
>> to have Vista installed when it often crashes in a BSOD due to driver
>> issues the Advisor claimed "shouldn't" be a problem, yes, it is fair
>> to label Vista as a disaster.
>>
>> Is there such a thing as a Quality Control Department at Microsoft?
>>
>
> So go back in your moms basement and keep sniffing her panties. Nobody
> cares about your lies
>

You're absolutely right. That's why most people have killfiled him. If
he doesn't like Microsoft products he doesn't have to use them.
I've had problems with some Microsoft products but I don't go to a
newsgroup and piss and moan about them.

C.B.


--
It is the responsibility and duty of everyone to help the underprivileged
and unfortunate among us.
 
In article <1e1e44lrm40qvssmr6te7d744bgg6pfrce@4ax.com>,
Adam Albright <AA@ABC.net> wrote:
>>I could give a rats ass.
>The correct phrase would be 'I couldn't give a rat's ass' which would

Can we be more careful about the rat remarks, please?
 
the wharf rat wrote:
> In article <1e1e44lrm40qvssmr6te7d744bgg6pfrce@4ax.com>,
> Adam Albright <AA@ABC.net> wrote:
>
>>>I could give a rats ass.
>>
>>The correct phrase would be 'I couldn't give a rat's ass' which would
>
>
> Can we be more careful about the rat remarks, please?
>

Ut oh...I smell a rat! :-)
Frank
 
Adam Albright wrote:
> I thought it would be fun to revisit one of my first posts to this
> newsgroup back in February of 2007. It rang true then, it even rings
> more true now.
>
> Here it is:
>
> The main problem with ALL Microsoft "support" groups is they are
> infested with way too many Microsoft butt kissers (ie MVP's) that
> simply seem unable to give objective advice and generally color their
> comments to favor Microsoft decisions no matter what. I find it
> amusing, but also misleading, harmful and counterproductive. :-)
>
> The reality is Vista ...

The reality is you seldom get advice - or even questions - about roof repair
at an "Advice to the lovelorn" column in the newspaper. Physicians seldom
pontificate on meatloaf recipes. You can't usually get spare keys made at a
hot-dog stand.

The people who claim to be "reality based" and wax unintelligibly about the
virtues of Linux on a Windows group have a really, really dim view of
reality.
 
On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 18:37:47 -0500, "HeyBub" <heybub@gmail.com> wrote:


>The people who claim to be "reality based" and wax unintelligibly about the
>virtues of Linux on a Windows group have a really, really dim view of
>reality.

You got me thinking. What exactly is reality?

Check out below Wikipedia article. It actually is rather interesting
and thought provoking:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality

Now if you're up for it, have an open mind and you have a IQ over 110
consider the following Quantum mechanics basics.

No Frank, not you idiot, you'd be hopelessly lost, following this
would be way, way over your head. Not you either Bill. SpankydeMoneky?
Forget it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_superposition
 
In article <48472726$0$31760$4c368faf@roadrunner.com>,
Frank <fb@sto.clm> wrote:
>
>Ut oh...I smell a rat! :-)


And therein lies a tail...
 
On Jun 4, 5:05 pm, Adam Albright <A...@ABC.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 18:37:47 -0500, "HeyBub" <hey...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >The people who claim to be "reality based" and wax unintelligibly about the
> >virtues of Linux on a Windows group have a really, really dim view of
> >reality.
>
> You got me thinking. What exactly is reality?
>
> Check out below Wikipedia article. It actually is rather interesting
> and thought provoking:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality
>
> Now if you're up for it, have an open mind and you have a IQ over 110
> consider the following Quantum mechanics basics.
>
> No Frank, not you idiot, you'd be hopelessly lost, following this
> would be way, way over your head. Not you either Bill. SpankydeMoneky?
> Forget it.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_superposition

Spank your own Monkey. Just FYI
 
On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 20:09:52 -0700 (PDT), spankydemonkey@gmail.com
wrote:

>On Jun 4, 5:05 pm, Adam Albright <A...@ABC.net> wrote:
>> On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 18:37:47 -0500, "HeyBub" <hey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >The people who claim to be "reality based" and wax unintelligibly about the
>> >virtues of Linux on a Windows group have a really, really dim view of
>> >reality.
>>
>> You got me thinking. What exactly is reality?
>>
>> Check out below Wikipedia article. It actually is rather interesting
>> and thought provoking:
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality
>>
>> Now if you're up for it, have an open mind and you have a IQ over 110
>> consider the following Quantum mechanics basics.
>>
>> No Frank, not you idiot, you'd be hopelessly lost, following this
>> would be way, way over your head. Not you either Bill. SpankydeMoneky?
>> Forget it.
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_superposition
>
>Spank your own Monkey. Just FYI

I'm not 13 like you act.
 
Re: Down adam albright's lying lane...LOL!

On Jun 5, 10:19 am, Frank <f...@sto.clm> wrote:
> Want to read more about this failed drunken accountant and big mouth
> lying pig?
> For your reading pleasure!
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?hl=en&enc_user=tYag3woAAABrYF....
>
> Enjoy!
> I know I did!...LOL!
> Frank

Adam is trying hard to convince people that he isn't the author of all
those posts. Adam even says that others are using his name! Don't
think so. Do a spot check of the messages and they are all the same.
Insulting everyone for having a diffrerent opinion than himself. Adam
is so full of himself, he just might explode and raw sewage might get
on the Sheep.
 
Re: Down adam albright's lying lane...LOL!

billYanaire2@gmail.com wrote:
> On Jun 5, 10:19 am, Frank <f...@sto.clm> wrote:
>
>>Want to read more about this failed drunken accountant and big mouth
>>lying pig?
>>For your reading pleasure!
>>
>>http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?hl=en&enc_user=tYag3woAAABrYF...
>>
>>Enjoy!
>>I know I did!...LOL!
>>Frank
>
>
> Adam is trying hard to convince people that he isn't the author of all
> those posts. Adam even says that others are using his name! Don't
> think so. Do a spot check of the messages and they are all the same.
> Insulting everyone for having a diffrerent opinion than himself. Adam
> is so full of himself, he just might explode and raw sewage might get
> on the Sheep.
>

Yeah and it's not hard to figure out why he's been unemployed for the
last 20+ yrs...he's unemployable!...LOL!
Frank
 
Back
Top