You need lessons in reading too I see.

 

"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

news:ir3qa3thks4cmvickvqm4hv9ojq4athr39@4ax.com...

> On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 14:05:08 -0700, "Gary"

> <Gary@NoSpam.california.usa> wrote:

>

>>Typical of someone who doesn't know how a display works.

>

> Yet another fallacy. Damn is Gary desperate to try to save face.

>>

>>Adam enjoys making a fool out of himself.

>

> Seems Adam made a fool out of Gary. Just check the facts. I just

> supplied the rope, you hung yourself.

>

> Want to play again? Pick another topic you're "expert" on.

>

> ROTFLMAO!

>

"Gary" <Gary@NoSpam.california.usa> wrote:

> You need lessons in reading too I see.

 

Would you PLEASE consider the original intent of this post and STOP

REPLYING TO TROLLS? Stick Adam in your killfile like everyone else has

done and move on.

 

Thank you.

 

 

--

XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups

The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html

On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 15:51:52 -0700, "Gary"

<Gary@NoSpam.california.usa> wrote:

>Yes I was wrong about USENET.

>

>And you were wrong about the only value for black in RGB is 0,0,0. See the

>light yet?

 

No, you are wrong in that you still can't separate what I actually

said from what you try to pretend I said. Interesting you still keep

trying to distort things by pretending I said other things I haven't

with your fallacy building. That makes you disingenuous at best.

On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 15:53:01 -0700, "Gary"

<Gary@NoSpam.california.usa> wrote:

>You need lessons in reading too I see.

>

>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

>news:ir3qa3thks4cmvickvqm4hv9ojq4athr39@4ax.com...

>> On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 14:05:08 -0700, "Gary"

>> <Gary@NoSpam.california.usa> wrote:

>>

>>>Typical of someone who doesn't know how a display works.

 

How would you expect me to respond when you deliberately lie like you

are in the above comment?

 

Not only do I know exactly how a display works, I've worked with

electronics building and designed countless projects as one of my

hobbies since I was a young kid, that's for over 55 years and

counting. I first got interested in electronics because of my older

cousin who while in the American air force was responsible for

maintaining some of the tracking radar of NORAD.

 

http://www.norad.mil/about/index.html

 

Any more smart ass comments you want to make?

Adam Albright wrote:

> On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 15:53:01 -0700, "Gary"

> <Gary@NoSpam.california.usa> wrote:

>

>

>>You need lessons in reading too I see.

>>

>>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

>>news:ir3qa3thks4cmvickvqm4hv9ojq4athr39@4ax.com...

>>

>>>On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 14:05:08 -0700, "Gary"

>>><Gary@NoSpam.california.usa> wrote:

>>>

>>>

>>>>Typical of someone who doesn't know how a display works.

>

>

> How would you expect me to respond when you deliberately lie like you

> are in the above comment?

>

> Not only do I know exactly how a display works, I've worked with

> electronics building and designed countless projects as one of my

> hobbies since I was a young kid, that's for over 55 years and

> counting. I first got interested in electronics because of my older

> cousin who while in the American air force was responsible for

> maintaining some of the tracking radar of NORAD.

>

> http://www.norad.mil/about/index.html

>

> Any more smart ass comments you want to make?

>

 

Don't blame NORAD nor your cousin for you stupidity mr genius.

Frank

And you still can not answer two simple questions.

 

What is the value for RGB for Black?

What three colors make up every pixel on your display?

 

Quite easy to answer. (Well maybe not for you, as you would explode if you

even tried to answer a question)

 

 

"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

news:ua7qa3l1pjgokj5lnvdi29k3h5ph3f88j8@4ax.com...

> On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 15:51:52 -0700, "Gary"

> <Gary@NoSpam.california.usa> wrote:

>

>>Yes I was wrong about USENET.

>>

>>And you were wrong about the only value for black in RGB is 0,0,0. See the

>>light yet?

>

> No, you are wrong in that you still can't separate what I actually

> said from what you try to pretend I said. Interesting you still keep

> trying to distort things by pretending I said other things I haven't

> with your fallacy building. That makes you disingenuous at best.

>

Then answer the question Mr. I was a black box changer in the Air Force.

Hope you managed to keep the connections straight.

But I'm sure they would color code them for you. Tell me were they Red Green

and Blue connections?

 

 

"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

news:jh7qa3t0rdg53qatpqm4fgltmgah89l7ba@4ax.com...

> On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 15:53:01 -0700, "Gary"

> <Gary@NoSpam.california.usa> wrote:

>

>>You need lessons in reading too I see.

>>

>>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

>>news:ir3qa3thks4cmvickvqm4hv9ojq4athr39@4ax.com...

>>> On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 14:05:08 -0700, "Gary"

>>> <Gary@NoSpam.california.usa> wrote:

>>>

>>>>Typical of someone who doesn't know how a display works.

>

> How would you expect me to respond when you deliberately lie like you

> are in the above comment?

>

> Not only do I know exactly how a display works, I've worked with

> electronics building and designed countless projects as one of my

> hobbies since I was a young kid, that's for over 55 years and

> counting. I first got interested in electronics because of my older

> cousin who while in the American air force was responsible for

> maintaining some of the tracking radar of NORAD.

>

> http://www.norad.mil/about/index.html

>

> Any more smart ass comments you want to make?

>

Gary wrote:

> Then answer the question Mr. I was a black box changer in the Air Force.

> Hope you managed to keep the connections straight.

> But I'm sure they would color code them for you. Tell me were they Red Green

> and Blue connections?

>

>

> "Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

> news:jh7qa3t0rdg53qatpqm4fgltmgah89l7ba@4ax.com...

>

>>On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 15:53:01 -0700, "Gary"

>><Gary@NoSpam.california.usa> wrote:

>>

>>

>>>You need lessons in reading too I see.

>>>

>>>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

>>>news:ir3qa3thks4cmvickvqm4hv9ojq4athr39@4ax.com...

>>>

>>>>On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 14:05:08 -0700, "Gary"

>>>><Gary@NoSpam.california.usa> wrote:

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>>Typical of someone who doesn't know how a display works.

>>

>>How would you expect me to respond when you deliberately lie like you

>>are in the above comment?

>>

>>Not only do I know exactly how a display works, I've worked with

>>electronics building and designed countless projects as one of my

>>hobbies since I was a young kid, that's for over 55 years and

>>counting. I first got interested in electronics because of my older

>>cousin who while in the American air force was responsible for

>>maintaining some of the tracking radar of NORAD.

>>

>>http://www.norad.mil/about/index.html

>>

>>Any more smart ass comments you want to make?

>>

>

>

>

hehehe...I doubt he was ever in the military cause he could never meet

the mental or physical requirements.

Frank

On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 17:28:54 -0700, Frank <fb@nospaner.cnm> wrote:

>Adam Albright wrote:

>

>> On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 15:53:01 -0700, "Gary"

>> <Gary@NoSpam.california.usa> wrote:

>>

>>

>>>You need lessons in reading too I see.

>>>

>>>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

>>>news:ir3qa3thks4cmvickvqm4hv9ojq4athr39@4ax.com...

>>>

>>>>On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 14:05:08 -0700, "Gary"

>>>><Gary@NoSpam.california.usa> wrote:

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>>Typical of someone who doesn't know how a display works.

>>

>>

>> How would you expect me to respond when you deliberately lie like you

>> are in the above comment?

>>

>> Not only do I know exactly how a display works, I've worked with

>> electronics building and designed countless projects as one of my

>> hobbies since I was a young kid, that's for over 55 years and

>> counting. I first got interested in electronics because of my older

>> cousin who while in the American air force was responsible for

>> maintaining some of the tracking radar of NORAD.

>>

>> http://www.norad.mil/about/index.html

>>

>> Any more smart ass comments you want to make?

>>

>

>Don't blame NORAD nor your cousin for you stupidity mr genius.

>Frank

 

Frank's intelligence is on a par with the fool:

 

http://bestoftheblogs.com/uploaded_images/dunce-778614.jpg

On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 18:06:06 -0700, Frank <fb@nospaner.cnm> wrote:

 

>hehehe...I doubt he was ever in the military cause he could never meet

>the mental or physical requirements.

>Frank

 

Frank having his annual brain scan. I don't think the doctor found

Frank's brain, but give him A+ for effort.

 

http://medicine.ucsd.edu/clinicalmed/genital-rectal-exam2.JPG

On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 17:32:55 -0700, "Gary"

<Gary@NoSpam.california.usa> wrote:

>And you still can not answer two simple questions.

>

>What is the value for RGB for Black?

>What three colors make up every pixel on your display?

>

>Quite easy to answer. (Well maybe not for you, as you would explode if you

>even tried to answer a question)

 

Aren't you tried of you stupid fallacy building yet dummy?

>

>

>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

>news:ua7qa3l1pjgokj5lnvdi29k3h5ph3f88j8@4ax.com...

>> On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 15:51:52 -0700, "Gary"

>> <Gary@NoSpam.california.usa> wrote:

>>

>>>Yes I was wrong about USENET.

>>>

>>>And you were wrong about the only value for black in RGB is 0,0,0. See the

>>>light yet?

>>

>> No, you are wrong in that you still can't separate what I actually

>> said from what you try to pretend I said. Interesting you still keep

>> trying to distort things by pretending I said other things I haven't

>> with your fallacy building. That makes you disingenuous at best.

>>

>

On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 17:37:46 -0700, "Gary"

<Gary@NoSpam.california.usa> wrote:

>Then answer the question Mr. I was a black box changer in the Air Force.

>Hope you managed to keep the connections straight.

>But I'm sure they would color code them for you. Tell me were they Red Green

>and Blue connections?

 

More proof you just a idiot. I said my older cousin worked for NORAD

you pencil dick dumbass moron.

>

>

>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

>news:jh7qa3t0rdg53qatpqm4fgltmgah89l7ba@4ax.com...

>> On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 15:53:01 -0700, "Gary"

>> <Gary@NoSpam.california.usa> wrote:

>>

>>>You need lessons in reading too I see.

>>>

>>>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

>>>news:ir3qa3thks4cmvickvqm4hv9ojq4athr39@4ax.com...

>>>> On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 14:05:08 -0700, "Gary"

>>>> <Gary@NoSpam.california.usa> wrote:

>>>>

>>>>>Typical of someone who doesn't know how a display works.

>>

>> How would you expect me to respond when you deliberately lie like you

>> are in the above comment?

>>

>> Not only do I know exactly how a display works, I've worked with

>> electronics building and designed countless projects as one of my

>> hobbies since I was a young kid, that's for over 55 years and

>> counting. I first got interested in electronics because of my older

>> cousin who while in the American air force was responsible for

>> maintaining some of the tracking radar of NORAD.

>>

>> http://www.norad.mil/about/index.html

>>

>> Any more smart ass comments you want to make?

>>

>

Yup still can't answer can you.

 

 

"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

news:gggqa3ti5t9l1ao8ifls2i0fi8hf757glp@4ax.com...

> On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 17:32:55 -0700, "Gary"

> <Gary@NoSpam.california.usa> wrote:

>

>>And you still can not answer two simple questions.

>>

>>What is the value for RGB for Black?

>>What three colors make up every pixel on your display?

>>

>>Quite easy to answer. (Well maybe not for you, as you would explode if you

>>even tried to answer a question)

>

> Aren't you tried of you stupid fallacy building yet dummy?

>>

>>

>>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

>>news:ua7qa3l1pjgokj5lnvdi29k3h5ph3f88j8@4ax.com...

>>> On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 15:51:52 -0700, "Gary"

>>> <Gary@NoSpam.california.usa> wrote:

>>>

>>>>Yes I was wrong about USENET.

>>>>

>>>>And you were wrong about the only value for black in RGB is 0,0,0. See

>>>>the

>>>>light yet?

>>>

>>> No, you are wrong in that you still can't separate what I actually

>>> said from what you try to pretend I said. Interesting you still keep

>>> trying to distort things by pretending I said other things I haven't

>>> with your fallacy building. That makes you disingenuous at best.

>>>

>>

>

Are you so stupid you can't answer a simple question. (well its simple for

anyone who knows how a display works.)

 

 

 

"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

news:uhgqa3d5clq8l679pbv7oirpfn8kgefem4@4ax.com...

> On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 17:37:46 -0700, "Gary"

> <Gary@NoSpam.california.usa> wrote:

>

>>Then answer the question Mr. I was a black box changer in the Air Force.

>>Hope you managed to keep the connections straight.

>>But I'm sure they would color code them for you. Tell me were they Red

>>Green

>>and Blue connections?

>

> More proof you just a idiot. I said my older cousin worked for NORAD

> you pencil dick dumbass moron.

>>

>>

>>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

>>news:jh7qa3t0rdg53qatpqm4fgltmgah89l7ba@4ax.com...

>>> On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 15:53:01 -0700, "Gary"

>>> <Gary@NoSpam.california.usa> wrote:

>>>

>>>>You need lessons in reading too I see.

>>>>

>>>>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

>>>>news:ir3qa3thks4cmvickvqm4hv9ojq4athr39@4ax.com...

>>>>> On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 14:05:08 -0700, "Gary"

>>>>> <Gary@NoSpam.california.usa> wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>>Typical of someone who doesn't know how a display works.

>>>

>>> How would you expect me to respond when you deliberately lie like you

>>> are in the above comment?

>>>

>>> Not only do I know exactly how a display works, I've worked with

>>> electronics building and designed countless projects as one of my

>>> hobbies since I was a young kid, that's for over 55 years and

>>> counting. I first got interested in electronics because of my older

>>> cousin who while in the American air force was responsible for

>>> maintaining some of the tracking radar of NORAD.

>>>

>>> http://www.norad.mil/about/index.html

>>>

>>> Any more smart ass comments you want to make?

>>>

>>

>

On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 19:03:50 -0700, "Gary"

<Gary@NoSpam.california.usa> wrote:

>Yup still can't answer can you.

 

Dance Gary dance!

On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 19:06:33 -0700, "Gary"

<Gary@NoSpam.california.usa> wrote:

>Are you so stupid you can't answer a simple question. (well its simple for

>anyone who knows how a display works.)

 

You're well on your way to having lost ALL your creditability.

Remember, you did it to yourself fool.

Adam Albright wrote:

> On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 17:32:55 -0700, "Gary"

> <Gary@NoSpam.california.usa> wrote:

>

>

>>And you still can not answer two simple questions.

>>

>>What is the value for RGB for Black?

>>What three colors make up every pixel on your display?

>>

>>Quite easy to answer. (Well maybe not for you, as you would explode if you

>>even tried to answer a question)

>

>

> Aren't you tried of you stupid fallacy building yet dummy?

>

>>

>>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

>>news:ua7qa3l1pjgokj5lnvdi29k3h5ph3f88j8@4ax.com...

>>

>>>On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 15:51:52 -0700, "Gary"

>>><Gary@NoSpam.california.usa> wrote:

>>>

>>>

>>>>Yes I was wrong about USENET.

>>>>

>>>>And you were wrong about the only value for black in RGB is 0,0,0. See the

>>>>light yet?

>>>

>>>No, you are wrong in that you still can't separate what I actually

>>>said from what you try to pretend I said. Interesting you still keep

>>>trying to distort things by pretending I said other things I haven't

>>>with your fallacy building. That makes you disingenuous at best.

>>>

>>

>

hehehe...just try and answer the question and save your "mr genius"

reputation, ok?

Frank

Adam Albright wrote:

> On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 17:28:54 -0700, Frank <fb@nospaner.cnm> wrote:

>

>

>>Adam Albright wrote:

>>

>>

>>>On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 15:53:01 -0700, "Gary"

>>><Gary@NoSpam.california.usa> wrote:

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>>You need lessons in reading too I see.

>>>>

>>>>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

>>>>news:ir3qa3thks4cmvickvqm4hv9ojq4athr39@4ax.com...

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>>On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 14:05:08 -0700, "Gary"

>>>>><Gary@NoSpam.california.usa> wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>>Typical of someone who doesn't know how a display works.

>>>

>>>

>>>How would you expect me to respond when you deliberately lie like you

>>>are in the above comment?

>>>

>>>Not only do I know exactly how a display works, I've worked with

>>>electronics building and designed countless projects as one of my

>>>hobbies since I was a young kid, that's for over 55 years and

>>>counting. I first got interested in electronics because of my older

>>>cousin who while in the American air force was responsible for

>>>maintaining some of the tracking radar of NORAD.

>>>

>>>http://www.norad.mil/about/index.html

>>>

>>>Any more smart ass comments you want to make?

>>>

>>

>>Don't blame NORAD nor your cousin for you stupidity mr genius.

>>Frank

>

>

> Frank's intelligence is on a par with the fool:

>

> http://bestoftheblogs.com/uploaded_images/dunce-778614.jpg

>

>

>

 

 

hehehe...does your brother know you're posting his pic?

Shame on you.

Frank

Adam Albright wrote:

> On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 18:06:06 -0700, Frank <fb@nospaner.cnm> wrote:

>

>

>

>>hehehe...I doubt he was ever in the military cause he could never meet

>>the mental or physical requirements.

>>Frank

>

>

> Frank having his annual brain scan. I don't think the doctor found

> Frank's brain, but give him A+ for effort.

>

> http://medicine.ucsd.edu/clinicalmed/genital-rectal-exam2.JPG

>

>

 

OMG, you've lost you head?

hehehe...that's the same place doctors found chaney's head!

Hahaha...so you're related?

Frank

DanS wrote:

> "xfile" <cou-cou@remove.nospam.com> wrote in

> news:OTwQ4jS0HHA.4236@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl:

>

>> Yes, MVP's are not MS employees and do not "officially" represent

>> Microsft, so I apologize if I mislead you and I know those facts.

>>

>> MVP is "awarded" by the company and they are "unofficial"

>> representatives of the company and they can aquire certain information

>> that are not available to the general public, plus some of them even

>> put "Microsoft Most Valuable Professional" as the title.

>>

>> So I take that as a form of represtation but not necessary the formal

>> one, and I can accept anyone who thinks otherwise.

>

> I was aware that MVPs do not officially represent MS, but I still think a

> professional manner, attitude, and posting content should be the way to go,

> regardless of the content of non-MVP posts.

>

> *Proffessional* is the key word here.

>

> I'm sure you've seen many posts from people (generally from GG or MS

> Communities web interface) that think MVPs are member's of MS, and that

> they get paid to answer questions here. Of course they don't, but the

> impression to the general public is that they do represent MS.

>

>

 

True. But they do get hundreds or thousands of dollars in MS software

for their MVP appointment. And you are quite correct about the

"impression of the general public".

 

--

Priceless quotes in m.p.w.vista.general group:

http://protectfreedom.tripod.com/kick.html

 

"Only religious fanatics and totalitarian states equate morality with

legality."

- Linus Torvalds

"The poster formerly known as Nina DiBoy" <none@none.not> wrote in message

news:f95ft5$h2p$1@aioe.org...

> DanS wrote:

>> "xfile" <cou-cou@remove.nospam.com> wrote in

>> news:OTwQ4jS0HHA.4236@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl:

>>> Yes, MVP's are not MS employees and do not "officially" represent

>>> Microsft, so I apologize if I mislead you and I know those facts.

>>>

>>> MVP is "awarded" by the company and they are "unofficial"

>>> representatives of the company and they can aquire certain information

>>> that are not available to the general public, plus some of them even

>>> put "Microsoft Most Valuable Professional" as the title.

>>>

>>> So I take that as a form of represtation but not necessary the formal

>>> one, and I can accept anyone who thinks otherwise.

>>

>> I was aware that MVPs do not officially represent MS, but I still think a

>> professional manner, attitude, and posting content should be the way to

>> go, regardless of the content of non-MVP posts.

>>

>> *Proffessional* is the key word here. I'm sure you've seen many posts

>> from people (generally from GG or MS Communities web interface) that

>> think MVPs are member's of MS, and that they get paid to answer questions

>> here. Of course they don't, but the impression to the general public is

>> that they do represent MS.

>>

>>

>

> True. But they do get hundreds or thousands of dollars in MS software for

> their MVP appointment. And you are quite correct about the "impression of

> the general public".

>

> --

> Priceless quotes in m.p.w.vista.general group:

> http://protectfreedom.tripod.com/kick.html

>

> "Only religious fanatics and totalitarian states equate morality with

> legality."

> - Linus Torvalds

>

You are completely up the wall on this idea. this and other NGs are not run

or moderated. We are all just users giving help to other users.

 

Anyone can tag themselves MVP but in means nothing.

 

--

Ian

 

With patience there is always a way.

 

Please Reply to Newsgroup so all can read.

Requests for assistance by email can not and will be deleted.