Posted July 15, 200816 yr In article <x9idnfKvRcSuIeHVnZ2dnUVZ_j6dnZ2d@supernews.com>, Rick <none@nomail.com> wrote: >On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 09:58:11 -0400, Moshe Goldfarb. wrote: (snip) >> Open Office, free, yet it can't even make a chip in MSOffice's >> domination of the application. Easy. Those who opposeopen source of any sort use data from "sales". See why that might give you the wrong number. ? While not new, it is still stupid ... yet they persist in doing it. Why ? I can only imagine that real data (like, say, number of installations or users) doesn't give them the faith they so obviously need that theirs is bigger. :)
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.