Guest 5000wpm@googlemail.com Posted July 23, 2007 Posted July 23, 2007 Hi, Recently we have upgraded our systems to Windows XP Pro x64 and have run into a Permissions Problem. The problem I am working on involves normal users being able to use the 'Process Monitor' administration tool. After a bit of searching I discovered the following from MS: >From Windows Server 2003, you will get an exception if you try to get process performance information under a non-admin account. The workaround is to add that account into the Performance Counter Users Group." I have found this response in server places quoting both "Performance Counter User" and "Performance Counter Users" Our domain is functioning as a Windows Server 2003 domain, but the "Performance Counter User"(s) group just does not exist. Working through this problem and possible solutions I have come across the 'Performance Log Users' and 'Performance Monitor Users' groups and the 'Profile single process' and 'Profile system performance' User rights (permissions). Our 'normal' user cannot use the Performance Monitor administration tool by default (which I suppose is to be expected) but still cannot while given the above groups/permissions. If the user is put into the Domain Admins group everything works fine. However it is not desirable that normal user has all other associated privileges. Using "runas" to run the PM as an administrator works, but means an administrator password is common knowledge. Is it a bug in xp64/2003 that giving users/groups the 'Profile System Performance' permission does not work? If it is not how on earth do I give my 'normal' user/group permissions to use the performance monitor snap in? Please, please can someone help? Kind Regards Phil Harvey. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.