Jump to content

Guest, which answer was the most helpful?

If any of these replies answered your question, please take a moment to click the 'Mark as solution' button on the post with the best answer.
Marking posts as the solution will help other community members find answers to their questions quickly. Thank you for your help!

Featured Replies

Posted

Before spending money on Vista I thought I'd see if I can't obtain a disk

from someone I know and give it a test run. Turns out someone I know had a

disk and let me borrow it. I figured, the 30 day trial is plenty of time

for me to figure out if I need to actually spend any money on this. Man,

am I glad I did this prior to spending money.

 

I have to say, I actually did say "Wow.......this is pathetic."

But hey, at least I had Wow in the sentence right?

 

Results:

 

- Sound does not work out of the box, though this has got to be the first

time I actually have seen the online driver search function work and find

a driver. So it worked after that...fair enough.

 

- Video does not work beyond 1024x768, latest drivers. Dealbreaker right

there. Google reveals that I'm not the only one with the issue and

apparently the only fix I've seen so far is to use the VGA output instead.

Difficult to do with a video card that only has DVI outputs, not to

mention that I run a dual monitor setup and need both my outputs no matter

what the type. Not even manually choosing the "1600x1200 Digital Flatpanel"

driver fixes this. So yes, I tried.

 

- My *MICROSOFT* Keyboard is not recognized correctly. It's a Japanese

keyboard, I select "Japanese" layout...and it does not give me a Japanese

layout no matter what I do. What else beyond selecting "Japanese" as my

keyboard type and layout am I supposed to friggin do?? Call bill gates?

Again, dealbreaker right there if I can't properly use my keyboard!

 

- Looking into the device manager I see about 4-5 other devices not

supported, including my SATA controller. Hard drive does obviously work

since Vista is running but I wonder if it was running at its optimum

performance seeing that the device manager was complaining about not

having a driver for the controller.

 

At that point in time...I just stopped and booted back into Ubuntu where

all of the above things just worked out of the box....and tomorrow I'll

temporarily disconnect my other hard drives so that I can reinstall XP and

be done with it. At least XP works with my less than 1 year old hardware

and at least gets my keyboard layout right half the time.

 

Oh and btw, did anyone ever tell Microsoft that we have more than 16

colors these days? Their OS installer is awfully unaware of this apparently.

 

I mean seriously, THIS is the best Microsoft can do??? THIS is supposed to

be progress? Advancement?? It can't even work correctly out of the box

with my very up to date hardware!

 

I seriously gave it a try and approached it with an open mind. Had I

actually spent 259 or worse 399 on this man would I be pissed right now.

 

--

Stephan

2003 Yamaha R6

 

å›ã®ã“ã¨æ€ã„出ã™æ—¥ãªã‚“ã¦ãªã„ã®ã¯

å›ã®ã“ã¨å¿˜ã‚ŒãŸã¨ããŒãªã„ã‹ã‚‰

  • Replies 127
  • Views 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

In article <OdWdnb8yjZaFHj_bnZ2dnUVZ8sninZ2d@giganews.com>,

Stephan Rose <nospam@spammer.com> wrote:

> - Video does not work beyond 1024x768, latest drivers. Dealbreaker right

> there. Google reveals that I'm not the only one with the issue and

> apparently the only fix I've seen so far is to use the VGA output instead.

> Difficult to do with a video card that only has DVI outputs, not to

> mention that I run a dual monitor setup and need both my outputs no matter

> what the type. Not even manually choosing the "1600x1200 Digital Flatpanel"

> driver fixes this. So yes, I tried.

 

Driver issue.

>

> - My *MICROSOFT* Keyboard is not recognized correctly. It's a Japanese

> keyboard, I select "Japanese" layout...and it does not give me a Japanese

> layout no matter what I do. What else beyond selecting "Japanese" as my

> keyboard type and layout am I supposed to friggin do?? Call bill gates?

> Again, dealbreaker right there if I can't properly use my keyboard!

 

Driver issue.

>

> - Looking into the device manager I see about 4-5 other devices not

> supported, including my SATA controller. Hard drive does obviously work

> since Vista is running but I wonder if it was running at its optimum

> performance seeing that the device manager was complaining about not

> having a driver for the controller.

 

Driver issue.

> I mean seriously, THIS is the best Microsoft can do??? THIS is supposed to

> be progress? Advancement?? It can't even work correctly out of the box

> with my very up to date hardware!

 

No, it's the best the hardware vendors who wrote the drivers can do. It's not Microsoft's job to write drivers.

 

Mike

You are kind of pathetic. I'll bet you don't wash you're behind before you

change you underwear too.

 

I'll bet you just ran off lickety split and install the software without

doing a compatibilty check to see if the computer was even compatible or

even strong enough to run Vista.

Everything you just said is a driver problem. Not a problem with VISTA.

 

 

"Stephan Rose" <nospam@spammer.com> wrote in message

news:OdWdnb8yjZaFHj_bnZ2dnUVZ8sninZ2d@giganews.com...

> Before spending money on Vista I thought I'd see if I can't obtain a disk

> from someone I know and give it a test run. Turns out someone I know had a

> disk and let me borrow it. I figured, the 30 day trial is plenty of time

> for me to figure out if I need to actually spend any money on this. Man,

> am I glad I did this prior to spending money.

>

> I have to say, I actually did say "Wow.......this is pathetic."

> But hey, at least I had Wow in the sentence right?

>

> Results:

>

> - Sound does not work out of the box, though this has got to be the first

> time I actually have seen the online driver search function work and find

> a driver. So it worked after that...fair enough.

>

> - Video does not work beyond 1024x768, latest drivers. Dealbreaker right

> there. Google reveals that I'm not the only one with the issue and

> apparently the only fix I've seen so far is to use the VGA output instead.

> Difficult to do with a video card that only has DVI outputs, not to

> mention that I run a dual monitor setup and need both my outputs no matter

> what the type. Not even manually choosing the "1600x1200 Digital

> Flatpanel"

> driver fixes this. So yes, I tried.

>

> - My *MICROSOFT* Keyboard is not recognized correctly. It's a Japanese

> keyboard, I select "Japanese" layout...and it does not give me a Japanese

> layout no matter what I do. What else beyond selecting "Japanese" as my

> keyboard type and layout am I supposed to friggin do?? Call bill gates?

> Again, dealbreaker right there if I can't properly use my keyboard!

>

> - Looking into the device manager I see about 4-5 other devices not

> supported, including my SATA controller. Hard drive does obviously work

> since Vista is running but I wonder if it was running at its optimum

> performance seeing that the device manager was complaining about not

> having a driver for the controller.

>

> At that point in time...I just stopped and booted back into Ubuntu where

> all of the above things just worked out of the box....and tomorrow I'll

> temporarily disconnect my other hard drives so that I can reinstall XP and

> be done with it. At least XP works with my less than 1 year old hardware

> and at least gets my keyboard layout right half the time.

>

> Oh and btw, did anyone ever tell Microsoft that we have more than 16

> colors these days? Their OS installer is awfully unaware of this

> apparently.

>

> I mean seriously, THIS is the best Microsoft can do??? THIS is supposed to

> be progress? Advancement?? It can't even work correctly out of the box

> with my very up to date hardware!

>

> I seriously gave it a try and approached it with an open mind. Had I

> actually spent 259 or worse 399 on this man would I be pissed right now.

>

> --

> Stephan

> 2003 Yamaha R6

>

> å›ã®ã“ã¨æ€ã„出ã™æ—¥ãªã‚“ã¦ãªã„ã®ã¯

> å›ã®ã“ã¨å¿˜ã‚ŒãŸã¨ããŒãªã„ã‹ã‚‰

On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 18:24:00 -0400, Mike wrote:

> In article <OdWdnb8yjZaFHj_bnZ2dnUVZ8sninZ2d@giganews.com>,

> Stephan Rose <nospam@spammer.com> wrote:

>

>> - Video does not work beyond 1024x768, latest drivers. Dealbreaker right

>> there. Google reveals that I'm not the only one with the issue and

>> apparently the only fix I've seen so far is to use the VGA output instead.

>> Difficult to do with a video card that only has DVI outputs, not to

>> mention that I run a dual monitor setup and need both my outputs no matter

>> what the type. Not even manually choosing the "1600x1200 Digital Flatpanel"

>> driver fixes this. So yes, I tried.

>

> Driver issue.

>

>>

>> - My *MICROSOFT* Keyboard is not recognized correctly. It's a Japanese

>> keyboard, I select "Japanese" layout...and it does not give me a Japanese

>> layout no matter what I do. What else beyond selecting "Japanese" as my

>> keyboard type and layout am I supposed to friggin do?? Call bill gates?

>> Again, dealbreaker right there if I can't properly use my keyboard!

>

> Driver issue.

 

And still a microsoft issue. It's a microsoft keyboard. Who, other than

microsoft, should be writing drivers for their own keyboard which I bought

in march/april time so *after* Vista was released?

>

>>

>> - Looking into the device manager I see about 4-5 other devices not

>> supported, including my SATA controller. Hard drive does obviously work

>> since Vista is running but I wonder if it was running at its optimum

>> performance seeing that the device manager was complaining about not

>> having a driver for the controller.

>

> Driver issue.

>

>> I mean seriously, THIS is the best Microsoft can do??? THIS is supposed to

>> be progress? Advancement?? It can't even work correctly out of the box

>> with my very up to date hardware!

>

> No, it's the best the hardware vendors who wrote the drivers can do.

> It's not Microsoft's job to write drivers.

 

Honestly, I really don't care. I seriously don't. I expect that when

someone charges up to 399 for their product that it works. I don't care how

it works. I don't care why it works. I don't care whose responsibility

what is. I only care that, had I spent money on it, that it would WORK!

 

Why it doesn't....does not concern me at all. I treat this like any other

product I buy.

 

If I buy a toaster I expect it to toast.

If I buy a car I expect it to drive.

If I buy a fridge I expect it to cool things!

 

On that same note, if I buy an operating system designed for a PC I expect

it work with my PC's hardware. Especially if said hardware was purchased

less than a year ago. If it doesn't, I don't care why it doesn't. I only

care about the problems I have as a result and the fact that it doesn't.

 

--

Stephan

2003 Yamaha R6

 

å›ã®ã“ã¨æ€ã„出ã™æ—¥ãªã‚“ã¦ãªã„ã®ã¯

å›ã®ã“ã¨å¿˜ã‚ŒãŸã¨ããŒãªã„ã‹ã‚‰

Stephan has been around for months knocking Vista, without even having tried

it.

 

Now he can do it with "authority"!

 

Sad piece of work, this fellow, almost as bad as Alias.

 

--

 

 

Regards,

 

Richard Urban

Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User

(For email, remove the obvious from my address)

 

Quote from George Ankner:

If you knew as much as you think you know,

You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew!

 

"Mr. Arnold" <MR. Arnold@Arnold.com> wrote in message

news:%23I8T3X%23yHHA.5408@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

> You are kind of pathetic. I'll bet you don't wash you're behind before you

> change you underwear too.

>

> I'll bet you just ran off lickety split and install the software without

> doing a compatibilty check to see if the computer was even compatible or

> even strong enough to run Vista.

> I seriously gave it a try and approached it with an open mind.

 

Sure you did... if your job was to paint the Sistine Chapel, we'd be looking

down, not up.

 

--

http://www.e-woodshop.net

Last update: 6/1/07

KarlC@ (the obvious)

On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 18:24:48 -0400, Mr. Arnold wrote:

> You are kind of pathetic. I'll bet you don't wash you're behind before you

> change you underwear too.

>

> I'll bet you just ran off lickety split and install the software without

> doing a compatibilty check to see if the computer was even compatible or

> even strong enough to run Vista.

 

Processor: Intel 2.4 GHz Core 2 Duo

Video Card: BFG 8800 GTX OC

RAM: 2048MB Kingston HyperX DDR2 800MHz 4-4-4-12

Hard drive: 320 gig SATAII

Motherboard: Asus P5WDG-WS

CD/DVD: Drive can handle any CD / DVD media including dual layer and

RAM-DVD and lightscribe.

Power Supply: 600W

Case: Thermaltake Kandalf

CPU Cooling: Blue Orb II

Sound Card: Audigy 2

 

Now if that isn't powerful enough for Vista...then I honestly don't know

what to say.

 

--

Stephan

2003 Yamaha R6

 

å›ã®ã“ã¨æ€ã„出ã™æ—¥ãªã‚“ã¦ãªã„ã®ã¯

å›ã®ã“ã¨å¿˜ã‚ŒãŸã¨ããŒãªã„ã‹ã‚‰

On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 17:39:49 -0500, Swingman wrote:

>> I seriously gave it a try and approached it with an open mind.

>

> Sure you did... if your job was to paint the Sistine Chapel, we'd be looking

> down, not up.

>

 

What more than install the OS, install the latest drivers, am I supposed

to do? Please...be so kind as to enlighten me.

 

Live with 1024x768 on a 1600x1200 LCD? no thank you.

 

If *you* have the solution to that problem for instance, that apparently

nobody else yet does, then please! Let's hear it! I'd be most interested.

 

--

Stephan

2003 Yamaha R6

 

å›ã®ã“ã¨æ€ã„出ã™æ—¥ãªã‚“ã¦ãªã„ã®ã¯

å›ã®ã“ã¨å¿˜ã‚ŒãŸã¨ããŒãªã„ã‹ã‚‰

On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 18:39:26 -0400, Richard Urban wrote:

> Stephan has been around for months knocking Vista, without even having tried

> it.

>

> Now he can do it with "authority"!

>

> Sad piece of work, this fellow, almost as bad as Alias.

>

 

Please, do me a favor...don't compare me with Alias. Yes I'm no big fan of

Vista and there are things about it I don't like, but I don't do what Alias

does. Not even remotely. My main reason to coming to this NG was educating

myself on Vista and it has been quite educational. I might occasionally

answer to OS specific discussions when such discussions actually contain

constructive statements and not insulting contests between Alias and

Frank...but I don't go around and post "Get Ubuntu" to every vista problem

post now do I?

 

Now, if you have any actual constructive thoughts and know of a solution

to any of the problems. Then please, by all means, I'd be interested in

hearing it. Google has not revealed much more other than that I'm not the

only one with said issues.

 

So I'm at the end of the road. More than install the OS and install the

appropriate drivers I can't do. But hey, if you know something I don't,

something else I could do, please do share. I will actually go give it a

try.

 

--

Stephan

2003 Yamaha R6

 

å›ã®ã“ã¨æ€ã„出ã™æ—¥ãªã‚“ã¦ãªã„ã®ã¯

å›ã®ã“ã¨å¿˜ã‚ŒãŸã¨ããŒãªã„ã‹ã‚‰

On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 18:24:48 -0400, "Mr. Arnold" <MR.

Arnold@Arnold.com> wrote:

>You are kind of pathetic. I'll bet you don't wash you're behind before you

>change you underwear too.

>

>I'll bet you just ran off lickety split and install the software without

>doing a compatibilty check to see if the computer was even compatible or

>even strong enough to run Vista.

 

 

Are you related to the other village idiot Frank?

On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 18:39:26 -0400, "Richard Urban"

<richardurbanREMOVETHIS@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Stephan has been around for months knocking Vista, without even having tried

>it.

>

>Now he can do it with "authority"!

>

>Sad piece of work, this fellow, almost as bad as Alias.

 

I bet if there was a way to give you clowns (MVPs) a banana, maybe you

would stop your screeching for a couple minutes.

 

Vista has problem, what problems?

 

http://texasholdemblogger.files.wordpress.com/2007/05/wildlife-monkeys-hear-no-evil-see-no-evil-speak-no-evil.jpg

 

The monkeys: left to right are Urban, Jupiter and Hall

Mr. Arnold wrote:

> You are kind of pathetic. I'll bet you don't wash you're behind before

> you change you underwear too.

>

> I'll bet you just ran off lickety split and install the software without

> doing a compatibilty check to see if the computer was even compatible or

> even strong enough to run Vista.

 

 

Idiot

Stephan Rose wrote:

> On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 18:24:00 -0400, Mike wrote:

>

>> In article <OdWdnb8yjZaFHj_bnZ2dnUVZ8sninZ2d@giganews.com>,

>> Stephan Rose <nospam@spammer.com> wrote:

>>

>>> - Video does not work beyond 1024x768, latest drivers. Dealbreaker right

>>> there. Google reveals that I'm not the only one with the issue and

>>> apparently the only fix I've seen so far is to use the VGA output instead.

>>> Difficult to do with a video card that only has DVI outputs, not to

>>> mention that I run a dual monitor setup and need both my outputs no matter

>>> what the type. Not even manually choosing the "1600x1200 Digital Flatpanel"

>>> driver fixes this. So yes, I tried.

>> Driver issue.

>>

>>> - My *MICROSOFT* Keyboard is not recognized correctly. It's a Japanese

>>> keyboard, I select "Japanese" layout...and it does not give me a Japanese

>>> layout no matter what I do. What else beyond selecting "Japanese" as my

>>> keyboard type and layout am I supposed to friggin do?? Call bill gates?

>>> Again, dealbreaker right there if I can't properly use my keyboard!

>> Driver issue.

>

> And still a microsoft issue. It's a microsoft keyboard. Who, other than

> microsoft, should be writing drivers for their own keyboard which I bought

> in march/april time so *after* Vista was released?

>

>>> - Looking into the device manager I see about 4-5 other devices not

>>> supported, including my SATA controller. Hard drive does obviously work

>>> since Vista is running but I wonder if it was running at its optimum

>>> performance seeing that the device manager was complaining about not

>>> having a driver for the controller.

>> Driver issue.

>>

>>> I mean seriously, THIS is the best Microsoft can do??? THIS is supposed to

>>> be progress? Advancement?? It can't even work correctly out of the box

>>> with my very up to date hardware!

>> No, it's the best the hardware vendors who wrote the drivers can do.

>> It's not Microsoft's job to write drivers.

>

> Honestly, I really don't care. I seriously don't. I expect that when

> someone charges up to 399 for their product that it works. I don't care how

> it works. I don't care why it works. I don't care whose responsibility

> what is. I only care that, had I spent money on it, that it would WORK!

>

> Why it doesn't....does not concern me at all. I treat this like any other

> product I buy.

>

> If I buy a toaster I expect it to toast.

> If I buy a car I expect it to drive.

> If I buy a fridge I expect it to cool things!

>

> On that same note, if I buy an operating system designed for a PC I expect

> it work with my PC's hardware. Especially if said hardware was purchased

> less than a year ago. If it doesn't, I don't care why it doesn't. I only

> care about the problems I have as a result and the fact that it doesn't.

>

 

 

Quite so, to most users the "Driver Issue" argument is irrelevant, it is

simply a "Fanboy" excuse.

Richard Urban wrote:

> Stephan has been around for months knocking Vista, without even having

> tried it.

>

> Now he can do it with "authority"!

>

> Sad piece of work, this fellow, almost as bad as Alias.

>

 

 

Can you spell sycophant ?

Swingman wrote:

>> I seriously gave it a try and approached it with an open mind.

>

> Sure you did... if your job was to paint the Sistine Chapel, we'd be

> looking down, not up.

>

 

Idiot

On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 18:06:46 -0500, Charlie Tame <charlie@tames.net>

wrote:

>Quite so, to most users the "Driver Issue" argument is irrelevant, it is

>simply a "Fanboy" excuse.

 

Looks especially lame when the driver is for a MICROSOFT keyboard.

 

My experience, the Vista compatibility advisor nagged about two

applications I had on my XP box. Both Microsoft.

 

ROTFLMAO!

Stephan Rose wrote:

> On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 18:39:26 -0400, Richard Urban wrote:

>

>

>>Stephan has been around for months knocking Vista, without even having tried

>>it.

>>

>>Now he can do it with "authority"!

>>

>>Sad piece of work, this fellow, almost as bad as Alias.

>>

>

>

> Please, do me a favor...don't compare me with Alias. Yes I'm no big fan of

> Vista and there are things about it I don't like, but I don't do what Alias

> does. Not even remotely. My main reason to coming to this NG was educating

> myself on Vista and it has been quite educational. I might occasionally

> answer to OS specific discussions when such discussions actually contain

> constructive statements and not insulting contests between Alias and

> Frank...but I don't go around and post "Get Ubuntu" to every vista problem

> post now do I?

>

> Now, if you have any actual constructive thoughts and know of a solution

> to any of the problems. Then please, by all means, I'd be interested in

> hearing it. Google has not revealed much more other than that I'm not the

> only one with said issues.

>

> So I'm at the end of the road. More than install the OS and install the

> appropriate drivers I can't do. But hey, if you know something I don't,

> something else I could do, please do share. I will actually go give it a

> try.

>

 

So you've been commenting on Vista and all along you've never installed

it? Now you tried to install it and you can't.

Well...that knocks your technical expertise image down a whole bunch of

notches.

Anyway, you've had an attitude about all things MS and Vista since the

get go.

My advice, stick with the "nix's.

Frank

"Stephan Rose" wrote in message

>

> If *you* have the solution to that problem for instance, that apparently

> nobody else yet does, then please! Let's hear it! I'd be most interested.

 

Hey, bubba .. you're the one slobbering in the public trough about _your

failure_ with an operating system. I've had a few problems with it, sure

enuff, but a little persistence has paid off with a laptop, running a

spanking new OS, that'll outwork the other boxes on this network ... imagine

that.

 

Indeed, sorry about your publicized failure to get it done.

 

--

http://www.e-woodshop.net

Last update: 6/1/07

KarlC@ (the obvious)

Stephan Rose wrote:

> On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 17:39:49 -0500, Swingman wrote:

>

>

>>>I seriously gave it a try and approached it with an open mind.

>>

>>Sure you did... if your job was to paint the Sistine Chapel, we'd be looking

>>down, not up.

>>

>

>

> What more than install the OS, install the latest drivers, am I supposed

> to do? Please...be so kind as to enlighten me.

>

> Live with 1024x768 on a 1600x1200 LCD? no thank you.

>

> If *you* have the solution to that problem for instance, that apparently

> nobody else yet does, then please! Let's hear it! I'd be most interested.

>

 

And all along I thought you actually knew what you were doing?

Sheese...!

Frank

Stephan Rose wrote:

> On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 17:39:49 -0500, Swingman wrote:

>

>>> I seriously gave it a try and approached it with an open mind.

>> Sure you did... if your job was to paint the Sistine Chapel, we'd be looking

>> down, not up.

>>

>

> What more than install the OS, install the latest drivers, am I supposed

> to do? Please...be so kind as to enlighten me.

>

> Live with 1024x768 on a 1600x1200 LCD? no thank you.

>

> If *you* have the solution to that problem for instance, that apparently

> nobody else yet does, then please! Let's hear it! I'd be most interested.

>

 

 

Well I don't know if the latest drivers for that video card are any good

or not personally, but I can tell you you would have to uninstall those

placed by Vista to get any sense at all out of the card.

 

I found that NONE of the drivers supplied with my brand new MB were

right, but did get downloaded ones that worked.

 

The fact is you can't explain to these fanboys that no company is going

to spend time writing drivers and then PAY to have them signed when MS

may be changing things just before release.

 

It was sold as an installable OS and that's what it should be, and

ignore the comments about checking "Compatibility" first, that simply

doesn't work.

 

My machines ALL said compatible, 3/3 failed to install without jumping

through hoops. The drivers supplied for my wireless cards were marked

Vista Ready, but obviously something was changed because they didn't

work and I had to download new ones.

On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 18:19:41 -0500, Charlie Tame wrote:

> Stephan Rose wrote:

>> On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 17:39:49 -0500, Swingman wrote:

>>

>>>> I seriously gave it a try and approached it with an open mind.

>>> Sure you did... if your job was to paint the Sistine Chapel, we'd be looking

>>> down, not up.

>>>

>>

>> What more than install the OS, install the latest drivers, am I supposed

>> to do? Please...be so kind as to enlighten me.

>>

>> Live with 1024x768 on a 1600x1200 LCD? no thank you.

>>

>> If *you* have the solution to that problem for instance, that apparently

>> nobody else yet does, then please! Let's hear it! I'd be most interested.

>>

>

>

> Well I don't know if the latest drivers for that video card are any good

> or not personally, but I can tell you you would have to uninstall those

> placed by Vista to get any sense at all out of the card.

 

The card itself actually works fine. The nVidia control panel is there,

everything in it works. I can adjust all the settings fine, the 3D Preview

works fine for adjusting the 3D settings.

 

Just the resolution is what doesn't work.

 

How would I even go about uninstalling whatever drive initially placed by

Vista? The device manager just lists my nVidia driver now so I wouldn't

even know what driver vista initially placed. I never bother to look for

that since my normal procedure with windows is to install it and then

install the latest nVidia driver.

 

--

Stephan

2003 Yamaha R6

 

å›ã®ã“ã¨æ€ã„出ã™æ—¥ãªã‚“ã¦ãªã„ã®ã¯

å›ã®ã“ã¨å¿˜ã‚ŒãŸã¨ããŒãªã„ã‹ã‚‰

>

>

> Are you related to the other village idiot Frank?

>

 

Why don't you ask you mama Adam Hopalong, you piss ant, since we both did

her, maybe you're related?

 

You stupid *piss ant* in your size to shoes trying to kick some behind can

you at least try to be creative? You have already used that one, piss ant.

<snipped>

 

Did you do hardware compatibility check? Did you do your homework?

 

You know the bottom line is about who is setting behind the keyboard and

mouse with your tail between your legs yapping.

"Charlie Tame" <charlie@tames.net> wrote in message

news:Oi6Zou%23yHHA.536@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

> Mr. Arnold wrote:

>> You are kind of pathetic. I'll bet you don't wash you're behind before

>> you change you underwear too.

>>

>> I'll bet you just ran off lickety split and install the software without

>> doing a compatibilty check to see if the computer was even compatible or

>> even strong enough to run Vista.

>

>

> Idiot

 

And your mama was one for having you. :)

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...