"Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.li> wrote in message

news:OPYyMWlzHHA.5980@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

> Not all of them. Some seem down right angry, frustrated and confused. Wait

> til the masses really buy their new computer with Vista, being as this

> group is, by default, configured in Windows Mail.

 

By the time "the masses" buy Vista computers, all of the teething problems

you see here (drivers, app compatibility, etc.) will be long since solved.

People posting here now are early adopters.

> You didn't see much talk about Linux in the xp.general group and still

> don't. Now, even MS fanboys are starting Linux threads. Must be the "new"

> thing: safe computing.

 

No, only Linux fanboy trolls (like you) start Linux threads in Windows

newgroups.

 

Mike

Mike wrote:

> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.li> wrote in message

> news:eelezPlzHHA.1208@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>> The time is ripe now, though, with Vista, because MS pushed the

>> envelop way too far. People don't like asking the vendor permission to

>> use what they paid for.

>

> <yawn>

>

> The EXACT same thing was said when XP was released. The result?

> Linux shot from 0.2% to 0.71%. Yippee.

>

> Mike

>

 

No it wasn't said much. Stick with 98 and W2K was said much. You're

talking pre activation times, yaknow, last century. People are getting

fed up.

 

Alias

Mike wrote:

> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.li> wrote in message

> news:OPYyMWlzHHA.5980@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

>> Not all of them. Some seem down right angry, frustrated and confused.

>> Wait til the masses really buy their new computer with Vista, being as

>> this group is, by default, configured in Windows Mail.

>

> By the time "the masses" buy Vista computers, all of the teething

> problems you see here (drivers, app compatibility, etc.) will be long

> since solved. People posting here now are early adopters.

>

>> You didn't see much talk about Linux in the xp.general group and still

>> don't. Now, even MS fanboys are starting Linux threads. Must be the

>> "new" thing: safe computing.

>

> No, only Linux fanboy trolls (like you) start Linux threads in Windows

> newgroups.

>

> Mike

>

 

No rebuttal but a lying insult. Related to Frank?

 

Alias

"Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.li> wrote in message

news:e7PbielzHHA.464@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

>> The EXACT same thing was said when XP was released. The result? Linux

>> shot from 0.2% to 0.71%. Yippee.

> No it wasn't said much. Stick with 98 and W2K was said much. You're

> talking pre activation times, yaknow, last century.

 

So your saying that XP doesn't need activated?

>People are getting fed up.

 

Yeah, the pirates are.

 

Speaking of last century, how is Linux doing?

 

Mike

"Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.li> wrote in message

news:%23cAGuflzHHA.464@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

> Mike wrote:

>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.li> wrote in message

>> news:OPYyMWlzHHA.5980@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

>>> Not all of them. Some seem down right angry, frustrated and confused.

>>> Wait til the masses really buy their new computer with Vista, being as

>>> this group is, by default, configured in Windows Mail.

>>

>> By the time "the masses" buy Vista computers, all of the teething

>> problems you see here (drivers, app compatibility, etc.) will be long

>> since solved. People posting here now are early adopters.

>>

>>> You didn't see much talk about Linux in the xp.general group and still

>>> don't. Now, even MS fanboys are starting Linux threads. Must be the

>>> "new" thing: safe computing.

>>

>> No, only Linux fanboy trolls (like you) start Linux threads in Windows

>> newgroups.

>>

>> Mike

>>

>

> No rebuttal but a lying insult. Related to Frank?

 

No rebuttal but a personal attack. Related to Adam Albright?

 

Mike

Mike wrote:

> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.li> wrote in message

> news:e7PbielzHHA.464@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

>

>>> The EXACT same thing was said when XP was released. The result?

>>> Linux shot from 0.2% to 0.71%. Yippee.

>

>> No it wasn't said much. Stick with 98 and W2K was said much. You're

>> talking pre activation times, yaknow, last century.

>

> So your saying that XP doesn't need activated?

 

No, of course not. That's when MS starting pushing the envelop and,

sigh, like I said, xp.general was not full of Linux posts. At the

beginning it was stick with 98 or W2K. Are you dense?

>

>> People are getting fed up.

>

> Yeah, the pirates are.

 

Not really. Vista is being pirated, although, XP is more in demand I'm sure.

>

> Speaking of last century, how is Linux doing?

>

> Mike

 

You're lamely trying to trot out a straw man. Please. If everyone adopts

Linux, no pirates for sure -)

 

Alias

Mike wrote:

> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.li> wrote in message

> news:%23cAGuflzHHA.464@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

>> Mike wrote:

>>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.li> wrote in message

>>> news:OPYyMWlzHHA.5980@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

>>>> Not all of them. Some seem down right angry, frustrated and

>>>> confused. Wait til the masses really buy their new computer with

>>>> Vista, being as this group is, by default, configured in Windows Mail.

>>>

>>> By the time "the masses" buy Vista computers, all of the teething

>>> problems you see here (drivers, app compatibility, etc.) will be long

>>> since solved. People posting here now are early adopters.

>>>

>>>> You didn't see much talk about Linux in the xp.general group and

>>>> still don't. Now, even MS fanboys are starting Linux threads. Must

>>>> be the "new" thing: safe computing.

>>>

>>> No, only Linux fanboy trolls (like you) start Linux threads in

>>> Windows newgroups.

>>>

>>> Mike

>>>

>>

>> No rebuttal but a lying insult. Related to Frank?

>

> No rebuttal but a personal attack. Related to Adam Albright?

>

> Mike

>

>

>

 

You were acting like Frank. Not an insult. An accurate observation

 

Alias

"Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.li> wrote in message

news:%23TEK8nlzHHA.1208@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

> You were acting like Frank. Not an insult. An accurate observation

 

And you are acting like a LinTroll. An accurate observation, and an

insult.

 

Mike

"Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.li> wrote in message

news:OqPKenlzHHA.1208@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

> No, of course not. That's when MS starting pushing the envelop and, sigh,

> like I said, xp.general was not full of Linux posts. At the beginning it

> was stick with 98 or W2K. Are you dense?

 

No, but you sure are. Still pimping an OS that no one is interested in.

How much are you being paid by "Ubuntu" to infiltrate MS newsgroups?

> You're lamely trying to trot out a straw man. Please. If everyone adopts

> Linux, no pirates for sure -)

 

But see, no one is adopting Linux:

 

http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=2&qpmr=15&qpdt=1&qpct=3&qpcal=1&qptimeframe=M&qpsp=101

 

Linux is behind Windows98, for god's sake. Just slightly above NT and ME.

All dead OSes.

 

Must make you mighty proud to be getting paid by a company going down the

toilet!

 

Mike

GO wrote:

> Frank wrote:

>

>>here@home.again wrote:

>>

>>

>>>"Alias" showed his hand...

>>>

>>>

>>>>The ONLY people who have to prove they're not a thief are paying

>>>>customers. Not one cracked version of XP or Vista needs activation

>>>>you moron!

>>>>

>>>>Alias

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>You're assuming Vista works without activation. Either you don't

>>>know and just think so because someone else says so, or you _are_ a

>>>thief. Plain and simple, even for you.

>>>

>>>

>>

>>hehehe...good one! :-)

>>Frank

>

>

> Oh yeah....real good one. There's any number of ways to know Vista works

> without activation without actually having a copy yourself.

>

>

 

Oh? And what might those be?

Well...?

Frank

Alias wrote:

> Mike wrote:

>

>> "Frank" <fb@nospamer.cmn> wrote in message

>> news:eojeMfizHHA.5052@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

>>

>>> Vista use grows as Mac OS X stays flat

>>>

>>> http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&taxonomyName=windows&articleId=9027558&taxonomyId=125

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>> Linux wasn't ready for the masses until recently.

>>

>>

>> It still isn't. Linux is still below 0%.

>>

>> http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=2

>>

>> The same numbers quoted in the above Computerworld article. I've

>> been quoting these numbers for years, but of course the Linux Loonies

>> *always* deny them. Funny how no one else denies them.

>>

>> Mike

>>

>

> There was a time when selectric typewriters out numbered computers.

> Windows is the past Linux is the future. You're staying with the past.

>

> Alias

 

Oh geeze, like making a fool out of yourself do you?

Don't bother to answer as you've already done so.

Frank

GO wrote:

> Frank wrote:

>

>>Alias wrote:

>>

>>

>>

>>>

>>>Assuming all your paying customers are thieves until they activate

>>>and genuinize themselves otherwise is very stupid PR and your

>>>support for it is even more stupid.

>>

>>Ok, lets put your "thief theory" to it final rest and be done with it,

>>once and for all.

>>When you purchase a car, a house, a motorcycle, etc., you're given a

>>physical key. When you open a bank account you're given a numerical

>>key that identifies your account. When you purchase software for use,

>>you're given a CD key. None of these "keys" come with any warning

>>stating that you are considered a "thief" until such time as you

>>prove otherwise. And you must use all of these keys, EXCEPT THE

>>SOFTWARE KEYS, each and every time you use your car, motorcycle,

>>enter your house, or access your bank account, correct? None of

>>them...in any way, shape or form, label or calls you a thief each

>>time you use them, correct?

>>So your bullsh*t theory (and it is yours alone. You own it!) is

>>nothing more than a bullsh*t self imagined ignorant theory and it is

>>totally meaningless!

>>Unless of course, you are a thief!

>

>

> One little thing you forgot when you were putting this theory to rest. A

> car, a house, or a motorcycle don't need to continually call back to the

> seller and make you verify that you bought said item.

>

>

>

hahaha...try running any one of them without a key...lol!

Frank

Alias wrote:

> GO wrote:

>

>> Frank wrote:

>>

>>> Alias wrote:

>>>

>>>

>>>>

>>>> Assuming all your paying customers are thieves until they activate

>>>> and genuinize themselves otherwise is very stupid PR and your

>>>> support for it is even more stupid.

>>>

>>> Ok, lets put your "thief theory" to it final rest and be done with it,

>>> once and for all.

>>> When you purchase a car, a house, a motorcycle, etc., you're given a

>>> physical key. When you open a bank account you're given a numerical

>>> key that identifies your account. When you purchase software for use,

>>> you're given a CD key. None of these "keys" come with any warning

>>> stating that you are considered a "thief" until such time as you

>>> prove otherwise. And you must use all of these keys, EXCEPT THE

>>> SOFTWARE KEYS, each and every time you use your car, motorcycle,

>>> enter your house, or access your bank account, correct? None of

>>> them...in any way, shape or form, label or calls you a thief each

>>> time you use them, correct?

>>> So your bullsh*t theory (and it is yours alone. You own it!) is

>>> nothing more than a bullsh*t self imagined ignorant theory and it is

>>> totally meaningless!

>>> Unless of course, you are a thief!

>>

>>

>> One little thing you forgot when you were putting this theory to rest. A

>> car, a house, or a motorcycle don't need to continually call back to the

>> seller and make you verify that you bought said item.

>>

>>

>>

>

> You noticed that too, eh?

>

> Alias

 

Maybe you missed the part where you need a real key anytime you want to

use any of them...hahaha...lol!

Frank

Alias wrote:

> Frank wrote:

>

>> Alias wrote:

>>

>>

>>>

>>>

>>> Assuming all your paying customers are thieves until they activate

>>> and genuinize themselves otherwise is very stupid PR and your support

>>> for it is even more stupid.

>>

>>

>> Ok, lets put your "thief theory" to it final rest and be done with it,

>> once and for all.

>> When you purchase a car, a house, a motorcycle, etc., you're given a

>> physical key.

>

>

> Apples/oranges.

>

>> When you open a bank account you're given a numerical key that

>> identifies your account.

>

>

> Apples/oranges.

>

>> When you purchase software for use, you're given a CD key.

>

>

> Sometimes but I avoid that kind of software.

>

>> None of these "keys" come with any warning stating that you are

>> considered a "thief" until such time as you prove otherwise.

>

>

> It's implied.

>

>> And you must use all of these keys, EXCEPT THE SOFTWARE KEYS, each and

>> every time you use your car, motorcycle, enter your house, or access

>> your bank account, correct?

>

>

> Apples/oranges.

>

>> None of them...in any way, shape or form, label or calls you a thief

>> each time you use them, correct?

>

>

> Apples/oranges.

>

>> So your bullsh*t theory (and it is yours alone. You own it!) is

>> nothing more than a bullsh*t self imagined ignorant theory and it is

>> totally meaningless!

>> Unless of course, you are a thief!

>

>

> You're not a thief. You are an idiot incapable of logic.

>

>>

>>

>> But, then again, your posts don't show much

>>

>>> intelligence so the dots are easy to connect.

>>

>>

>> Connecting any dots of the truth seems to be a real problems for you.

>

>

> Only in Frank's World.

>

>>>

>>> I just visited a neighbor of mine and he told me that he would never,

>>> ever get Vista and so I installed Ubuntu for him and he loves it.

>>> He's got over a hundred contacts all over the world through IM that

>>> he told me he will tell about Ubuntu and get them to try it too. When

>>> was the last time you saw this kind of enthusiasm for Windows, 95?

>>

>>

>> I'm real happy for you and him!

>>

>>>

>>> Why is this news? Because for the first time in history, there's an

>>> OS that anyone except you can install...

>>

>>

>>

>> Ut,ut,ut...lying again alias. I've used linux long before you've ever

>> even heard of it. You're only making a stupid fool out of yourself by

>> saying that. But don't let me stand in your way of making a fool out

>> of yourself. You're very good at ti!

>

>

> You've admitted right here that you couldn't install Ubuntu.

>

>>

>> and use besides Mac that is giving

>>

>>> competition to MS.

>>

>>

>> It is? Nope, wrong again.

>>

>> Vista use grows as Mac OS X stays flat

>>

>> http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&taxonomyName=windows&articleId=9027558&taxonomyId=125

>

>

>

>

> That's because of people opting for Ubuntu, of course!

>

>>

>>

>> Linux wasn't ready for the masses until recently.

>>

>>

>> Wrong again!

>

>

> Um, you're wrong, sorry. Live with it.

>

> Snip the usual insults.

>

> Alias

 

 

You can no longer defend your lies nor can you accept the truth.

We now see this response from you all the time.

It's disappointing, as you've previously presented yourself as a

mentally aware individual.

I'm now very clear that you're not quite what you purport to be.

You're a charlatan.

IOW you're actually rather stupid, quite dumb, ignorant and little slow,

yet you think you're brilliant!

Aaahhh, the biggest fool is the one who fools himself.

Well, that's life pal.

Anything you say in the future will be graded against what you really

are...nothing but a lying linux loser.

No more, no less.

Live with it as it’s the bed you’ve made and you must now sleep in it.

Too bad (for you!).

Frank

Alias wrote:

> Frank wrote:

>

>> Alias wrote:

>>

>>> Frank wrote:

>>>

>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> Frank wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> ......It's MUCH easier than Windows to install....

>>>>>>

>>>>>> -----------------------------------------------------

>>>>>>

>>>>>> BS liar!

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Not BS.

>>>>>

>>>>>> Sorry pal, but that's one big lie!

>>>>>> Frank

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Sorry, pay, but you're wrong (again)

>>>>>

>>>>> On this very computer, it took me a couple of days to install

>>>>> Windows XP, Office and all my programs. Ubuntu took less than three

>>>>> hours, including all the updates, programs, Beryl, gDesklets, etc.

>>>>>

>>>>> Just because you're too stoopid to install Ubuntu doesn't mean that

>>>>> everyone is as much a lamer as you are.

>>>>>

>>>>> Alias

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Don't change the subject. Installing the OS is the subject matter.

>>>> Nothing is easier to install than Vista...nothing.

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>> False.

>>>

>>>> Oh...sorry, I forgot you've never installed Vista so how would you

>>>> even know...lol!

>>>> Frank

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>> No driver here, no driver there, no quick books here, no Adobe there.

>>> Puhlease, Vista won't be easy to install until at least SP1 if not

>>> SP2. Even rigs that come with Vista pre-installed have problems right

>>> out of the box. A friend of mine bought a lap top with Vista. He

>>> looked at it and shut down. He tried to boot it up again and, lo and

>>> behold, a BSOD. He's disgusted and went to download Ubuntu.

>>>

>>> Oops.

>>>

>>> Alias

>>

>>

>>

>> Oops?

>> You don't have Vista...you've never installed Vista...you don't know

>> what you're talking about.

>> Oops!!!

>> Frank

>

>

> Your lame argument is that I haven't installed Vista. Do you think I

> can't read? Do you think I don't know people who have installed Vista?

> Your desperation at reaching for straws with this is obvious.

>

> Alias

 

hahaha...I'm not the one who doesn't have the REAL Vista

experience...hahaha...who are you trying to fool...cause you're only

fooling yourself.

You're the desperate fool, fool!

Frank

Frank wrote:

> Alias wrote:

>

>> Mike wrote:

>>

>>> "Frank" <fb@nospamer.cmn> wrote in message

>>> news:eojeMfizHHA.5052@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

>>>

>>>> Vista use grows as Mac OS X stays flat

>>>>

>>>> http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&taxonomyName=windows&articleId=9027558&taxonomyId=125

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Linux wasn't ready for the masses until recently.

>>>

>>>

>>> It still isn't. Linux is still below 0%.

>>>

>>> http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=2

>>>

>>> The same numbers quoted in the above Computerworld article. I've

>>> been quoting these numbers for years, but of course the Linux Loonies

>>> *always* deny them. Funny how no one else denies them.

>>>

>>> Mike

>>>

>>

>> There was a time when selectric typewriters out numbered computers.

>> Windows is the past Linux is the future. You're staying with the past.

>>

>> Alias

>

> Oh geeze, like making a fool out of yourself do you?

> Don't bother to answer as you've already done so.

> Frank

 

Frank: the original poster child for "I know you are but what am I?"

 

Alias

Frank wrote:

> GO wrote:

>

>> Frank wrote:

>>

>>> here@home.again wrote:

>>>

>>>

>>>> "Alias" showed his hand...

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>> The ONLY people who have to prove they're not a thief are paying

>>>>> customers. Not one cracked version of XP or Vista needs activation

>>>>> you moron!

>>>>>

>>>>> Alias

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> You're assuming Vista works without activation. Either you don't

>>>> know and just think so because someone else says so, or you _are_ a

>>>> thief. Plain and simple, even for you.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>

>>> hehehe...good one! :-)

>>> Frank

>>

>>

>> Oh yeah....real good one. There's any number of ways to know Vista

>> works without activation without actually having a copy yourself.

>>

>>

>

> Oh? And what might those be?

> Well...?

> Frank

 

Oh, I don't know....like reading stuff or perhaps even witnessing it?

Frank wrote:

> GO wrote:

>

>> Frank wrote:

>>

>>> Alias wrote:

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>>

>>>> Assuming all your paying customers are thieves until they activate

>>>> and genuinize themselves otherwise is very stupid PR and your

>>>> support for it is even more stupid.

>>>

>>> Ok, lets put your "thief theory" to it final rest and be done with

>>> it, once and for all.

>>> When you purchase a car, a house, a motorcycle, etc., you're given a

>>> physical key. When you open a bank account you're given a numerical

>>> key that identifies your account. When you purchase software for

>>> use, you're given a CD key. None of these "keys" come with any

>>> warning stating that you are considered a "thief" until such time

>>> as you prove otherwise. And you must use all of these keys, EXCEPT

>>> THE SOFTWARE KEYS, each and every time you use your car, motorcycle,

>>> enter your house, or access your bank account, correct? None of

>>> them...in any way, shape or form, label or calls you a thief each

>>> time you use them, correct?

>>> So your bullsh*t theory (and it is yours alone. You own it!) is

>>> nothing more than a bullsh*t self imagined ignorant theory and it is

>>> totally meaningless!

>>> Unless of course, you are a thief!

>>

>>

>> One little thing you forgot when you were putting this theory to

>> rest. A car, a house, or a motorcycle don't need to continually

>> call back to the seller and make you verify that you bought said

>> item.

>>

>>

>>

> hahaha...try running any one of them without a key...lol!

> Frank

 

Where did I ever say anything about running them without a key?

Frank wrote:

> Alias wrote:

>

>> GO wrote:

>>

>>> Frank wrote:

>>>

>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Assuming all your paying customers are thieves until they activate

>>>>> and genuinize themselves otherwise is very stupid PR and your

>>>>> support for it is even more stupid.

>>>>

>>>> Ok, lets put your "thief theory" to it final rest and be done with it,

>>>> once and for all.

>>>> When you purchase a car, a house, a motorcycle, etc., you're given a

>>>> physical key. When you open a bank account you're given a numerical

>>>> key that identifies your account. When you purchase software for use,

>>>> you're given a CD key. None of these "keys" come with any warning

>>>> stating that you are considered a "thief" until such time as you

>>>> prove otherwise. And you must use all of these keys, EXCEPT THE

>>>> SOFTWARE KEYS, each and every time you use your car, motorcycle,

>>>> enter your house, or access your bank account, correct? None of

>>>> them...in any way, shape or form, label or calls you a thief each

>>>> time you use them, correct?

>>>> So your bullsh*t theory (and it is yours alone. You own it!) is

>>>> nothing more than a bullsh*t self imagined ignorant theory and it is

>>>> totally meaningless!

>>>> Unless of course, you are a thief!

>>>

>>>

>>> One little thing you forgot when you were putting this theory to

>>> rest. A

>>> car, a house, or a motorcycle don't need to continually call back to the

>>> seller and make you verify that you bought said item.

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>

>> You noticed that too, eh?

>>

>> Alias

>

> Maybe you missed the part where you need a real key anytime you want to

> use any of them...hahaha...lol!

> Frank

 

Frank, there are many things you can use without a key. A book, which is

copyright, for example. To use your lame apple/orange examples, once you

install Windows, the key to get in is your password, not permission from

Redmond. Does your Toyota call Japan when you change spark plugs or oil?

 

Alias

GO wrote:

> Frank wrote:

>> GO wrote:

>>

>>> Frank wrote:

>>>

>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>> Assuming all your paying customers are thieves until they activate

>>>>> and genuinize themselves otherwise is very stupid PR and your

>>>>> support for it is even more stupid.

>>>> Ok, lets put your "thief theory" to it final rest and be done with

>>>> it, once and for all.

>>>> When you purchase a car, a house, a motorcycle, etc., you're given a

>>>> physical key. When you open a bank account you're given a numerical

>>>> key that identifies your account. When you purchase software for

>>>> use, you're given a CD key. None of these "keys" come with any

>>>> warning stating that you are considered a "thief" until such time

>>>> as you prove otherwise. And you must use all of these keys, EXCEPT

>>>> THE SOFTWARE KEYS, each and every time you use your car, motorcycle,

>>>> enter your house, or access your bank account, correct? None of

>>>> them...in any way, shape or form, label or calls you a thief each

>>>> time you use them, correct?

>>>> So your bullsh*t theory (and it is yours alone. You own it!) is

>>>> nothing more than a bullsh*t self imagined ignorant theory and it is

>>>> totally meaningless!

>>>> Unless of course, you are a thief!

>>>

>>> One little thing you forgot when you were putting this theory to

>>> rest. A car, a house, or a motorcycle don't need to continually

>>> call back to the seller and make you verify that you bought said

>>> item.

>>>

>>>

>>>

>> hahaha...try running any one of them without a key...lol!

>> Frank

>

> Where did I ever say anything about running them without a key?

>

>

>

 

Frank's usual tactic when refuted is to change the subject and ignore

the refutation.

 

Alias

Frank wrote:

> Alias wrote:

>

>> Frank wrote:

>>

>>> Alias wrote:

>>>

>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Assuming all your paying customers are thieves until they activate

>>>> and genuinize themselves otherwise is very stupid PR and your

>>>> support for it is even more stupid.

>>>

>>>

>>> Ok, lets put your "thief theory" to it final rest and be done with

>>> it, once and for all.

>>> When you purchase a car, a house, a motorcycle, etc., you're given a

>>> physical key.

>>

>>

>> Apples/oranges.

>>

>>> When you open a bank account you're given a numerical key that

>>> identifies your account.

>>

>>

>> Apples/oranges.

>>

>>> When you purchase software for use, you're given a CD key.

>>

>>

>> Sometimes but I avoid that kind of software.

>>

>>> None of these "keys" come with any warning stating that you are

>>> considered a "thief" until such time as you prove otherwise.

>>

>>

>> It's implied.

>>

>>> And you must use all of these keys, EXCEPT THE SOFTWARE KEYS, each

>>> and every time you use your car, motorcycle, enter your house, or

>>> access your bank account, correct?

>>

>>

>> Apples/oranges.

>>

>>> None of them...in any way, shape or form, label or calls you a thief

>>> each time you use them, correct?

>>

>>

>> Apples/oranges.

>>

>>> So your bullsh*t theory (and it is yours alone. You own it!) is

>>> nothing more than a bullsh*t self imagined ignorant theory and it is

>>> totally meaningless!

>>> Unless of course, you are a thief!

>>

>>

>> You're not a thief. You are an idiot incapable of logic.

>>

>>>

>>>

>>> But, then again, your posts don't show much

>>>

>>>> intelligence so the dots are easy to connect.

>>>

>>>

>>> Connecting any dots of the truth seems to be a real problems for you.

>>

>>

>> Only in Frank's World.

>>

>>>>

>>>> I just visited a neighbor of mine and he told me that he would

>>>> never, ever get Vista and so I installed Ubuntu for him and he loves

>>>> it. He's got over a hundred contacts all over the world through IM

>>>> that he told me he will tell about Ubuntu and get them to try it

>>>> too. When was the last time you saw this kind of enthusiasm for

>>>> Windows, 95?

>>>

>>>

>>> I'm real happy for you and him!

>>>

>>>>

>>>> Why is this news? Because for the first time in history, there's an

>>>> OS that anyone except you can install...

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>> Ut,ut,ut...lying again alias. I've used linux long before you've ever

>>> even heard of it. You're only making a stupid fool out of yourself by

>>> saying that. But don't let me stand in your way of making a fool out

>>> of yourself. You're very good at ti!

>>

>>

>> You've admitted right here that you couldn't install Ubuntu.

>>

>>>

>>> and use besides Mac that is giving

>>>

>>>> competition to MS.

>>>

>>>

>>> It is? Nope, wrong again.

>>>

>>> Vista use grows as Mac OS X stays flat

>>>

>>> http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&taxonomyName=windows&articleId=9027558&taxonomyId=125

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>> That's because of people opting for Ubuntu, of course!

>>

>>>

>>>

>>> Linux wasn't ready for the masses until recently.

>>>

>>>

>>> Wrong again!

>>

>>

>> Um, you're wrong, sorry. Live with it.

>>

>> Snip the usual insults.

>>

>> Alias

>

>

> You can no longer defend your lies nor can you accept the truth.

> We now see this response from you all the time.

> It's disappointing, as you've previously presented yourself as a

> mentally aware individual.

> I'm now very clear that you're not quite what you purport to be.

> You're a charlatan.

> IOW you're actually rather stupid, quite dumb, ignorant and little slow,

> yet you think you're brilliant!

> Aaahhh, the biggest fool is the one who fools himself.

> Well, that's life pal.

> Anything you say in the future will be graded against what you really

> are...nothing but a lying linux loser.

> No more, no less.

> Live with it as it’s the bed you’ve made and you must now sleep in it.

> Too bad (for you!).

> Frank

>

>

 

Translation: Frank can't refute my argument so he engages in a pseudo

psychoanalysis of me and, naturally, his usual insults.

 

Alias

Mike wrote:

> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.li> wrote in message

> news:OqPKenlzHHA.1208@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

>> No, of course not. That's when MS starting pushing the envelop and,

>> sigh, like I said, xp.general was not full of Linux posts. At the

>> beginning it was stick with 98 or W2K. Are you dense?

>

> No, but you sure are. Still pimping an OS that no one is interested

> in. How much are you being paid by "Ubuntu" to infiltrate MS newsgroups?

 

Um, pimps make money when they pimp. I make no money by posting here. I

don't know anyone who runs Ubuntu. Course, like Frank, you think it cute

and clever to lie and insult those who you cannot refute.

>

>> You're lamely trying to trot out a straw man. Please. If everyone

>> adopts Linux, no pirates for sure -)

>

> But see, no one is adopting Linux:

>

> http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=2&qpmr=15&qpdt=1&qpct=3&qpcal=1&qptimeframe=M&qpsp=101

>

>

> Linux is behind Windows98, for god's sake. Just slightly above NT and

> ME. All dead OSes.

>

> Must make you mighty proud to be getting paid by a company going down

> the toilet!

>

> Mike

 

Would you commit hari kari if Linux takes over the desktop/laptop business?

 

Alias

Frank wrote:

> Alias wrote:

>

>> Frank wrote:

>>

>>> Alias wrote:

>>>

>>>> Frank wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> Frank wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> ......It's MUCH easier than Windows to install....

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> -----------------------------------------------------

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> BS liar!

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Not BS.

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Sorry pal, but that's one big lie!

>>>>>>> Frank

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Sorry, pay, but you're wrong (again)

>>>>>>

>>>>>> On this very computer, it took me a couple of days to install

>>>>>> Windows XP, Office and all my programs. Ubuntu took less than

>>>>>> three hours, including all the updates, programs, Beryl,

>>>>>> gDesklets, etc.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Just because you're too stoopid to install Ubuntu doesn't mean

>>>>>> that everyone is as much a lamer as you are.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Alias

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Don't change the subject. Installing the OS is the subject matter.

>>>>> Nothing is easier to install than Vista...nothing.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> False.

>>>>

>>>>> Oh...sorry, I forgot you've never installed Vista so how would you

>>>>> even know...lol!

>>>>> Frank

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> No driver here, no driver there, no quick books here, no Adobe

>>>> there. Puhlease, Vista won't be easy to install until at least SP1

>>>> if not SP2. Even rigs that come with Vista pre-installed have

>>>> problems right out of the box. A friend of mine bought a lap top

>>>> with Vista. He looked at it and shut down. He tried to boot it up

>>>> again and, lo and behold, a BSOD. He's disgusted and went to

>>>> download Ubuntu.

>>>>

>>>> Oops.

>>>>

>>>> Alias

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>> Oops?

>>> You don't have Vista...you've never installed Vista...you don't know

>>> what you're talking about.

>>> Oops!!!

>>> Frank

>>

>>

>> Your lame argument is that I haven't installed Vista. Do you think I

>> can't read? Do you think I don't know people who have installed Vista?

>> Your desperation at reaching for straws with this is obvious.

>>

>> Alias

>

> hahaha...I'm not the one who doesn't have the REAL Vista

> experience...hahaha...who are you trying to fool...cause you're only

> fooling yourself.

> You're the desperate fool, fool!

> Frank

 

Once again, old Frankie Boy, when soundly refuted, resorts to his old

and tired insults.

 

Alias

Alias wrote:

> Frank wrote:

>

>> Alias wrote:

>>

>>> GO wrote:

>>>

>>>> Frank wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Assuming all your paying customers are thieves until they activate

>>>>>> and genuinize themselves otherwise is very stupid PR and your

>>>>>> support for it is even more stupid.

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Ok, lets put your "thief theory" to it final rest and be done with it,

>>>>> once and for all.

>>>>> When you purchase a car, a house, a motorcycle, etc., you're given a

>>>>> physical key. When you open a bank account you're given a numerical

>>>>> key that identifies your account. When you purchase software for use,

>>>>> you're given a CD key. None of these "keys" come with any warning

>>>>> stating that you are considered a "thief" until such time as you

>>>>> prove otherwise. And you must use all of these keys, EXCEPT THE

>>>>> SOFTWARE KEYS, each and every time you use your car, motorcycle,

>>>>> enter your house, or access your bank account, correct? None of

>>>>> them...in any way, shape or form, label or calls you a thief each

>>>>> time you use them, correct?

>>>>> So your bullsh*t theory (and it is yours alone. You own it!) is

>>>>> nothing more than a bullsh*t self imagined ignorant theory and it is

>>>>> totally meaningless!

>>>>> Unless of course, you are a thief!

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> One little thing you forgot when you were putting this theory to

>>>> rest. A

>>>> car, a house, or a motorcycle don't need to continually call back to

>>>> the

>>>> seller and make you verify that you bought said item.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>

>>> You noticed that too, eh?

>>>

>>> Alias

>>

>>

>> Maybe you missed the part where you need a real key anytime you want

>> to use any of them...hahaha...lol!

>> Frank

>

>

> Frank, there are many things you can use without a key. A book, which is

> copyright, for example. To use your lame apple/orange examples, once you

> install Windows, the key to get in is your password, not permission from

> Redmond. Does your Toyota call Japan when you change spark plugs or oil?

>

> Alias

 

Now who would've thought that my post would go right over your little

pointy head and you wouldn't even have to duck?

Can you image that?

Frank

Frank wrote:

> Alias wrote:

>> Frank wrote:

>>

>>> Alias wrote:

>>>

>>>> GO wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> Frank wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Assuming all your paying customers are thieves until they activate

>>>>>>> and genuinize themselves otherwise is very stupid PR and your

>>>>>>> support for it is even more stupid.

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Ok, lets put your "thief theory" to it final rest and be done with

>>>>>> it,

>>>>>> once and for all.

>>>>>> When you purchase a car, a house, a motorcycle, etc., you're given a

>>>>>> physical key. When you open a bank account you're given a numerical

>>>>>> key that identifies your account. When you purchase software for use,

>>>>>> you're given a CD key. None of these "keys" come with any warning

>>>>>> stating that you are considered a "thief" until such time as you

>>>>>> prove otherwise. And you must use all of these keys, EXCEPT THE

>>>>>> SOFTWARE KEYS, each and every time you use your car, motorcycle,

>>>>>> enter your house, or access your bank account, correct? None of

>>>>>> them...in any way, shape or form, label or calls you a thief each

>>>>>> time you use them, correct?

>>>>>> So your bullsh*t theory (and it is yours alone. You own it!) is

>>>>>> nothing more than a bullsh*t self imagined ignorant theory and it is

>>>>>> totally meaningless!

>>>>>> Unless of course, you are a thief!

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> One little thing you forgot when you were putting this theory to

>>>>> rest. A

>>>>> car, a house, or a motorcycle don't need to continually call back

>>>>> to the

>>>>> seller and make you verify that you bought said item.

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> You noticed that too, eh?

>>>>

>>>> Alias

>>>

>>>

>>> Maybe you missed the part where you need a real key anytime you want

>>> to use any of them...hahaha...lol!

>>> Frank

>>

>>

>> Frank, there are many things you can use without a key. A book, which

>> is copyright, for example. To use your lame apple/orange examples,

>> once you install Windows, the key to get in is your password, not

>> permission from Redmond. Does your Toyota call Japan when you change

>> spark plugs or oil?

>>

>> Alias

>

> Now who would've thought that my post would go right over your little

> pointy head and you wouldn't even have to duck?

> Can you image that?

> Frank

 

Translation: Frank's been soundly refuted once again so he resorts to

insults as usual.

 

Alias