I cant find any more vistas to run franky poo.. you have shoved them all up

your ars

 

 

"Frank" <fab@notspam.com> wrote in message

news:%23reGaNanIHA.1768@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

> laugh at the idiot loser in the box wrote:

>

>

> --------------------------------------------

>

> Ahhhh...what's cc? Can't figure out how to properly run Vista? Are you

> that stupid?...LOL!

> Figures!

> Frank

"Gordon" <gbplinux@gmail.com.invalid> wrote in message

news:fttjr0$7sf$1@news.mixmin.net...

> "Canuck57" <dave-no_spam@unixhome.net> wrote in message

> news:GbsMj.178778$pM4.74389@pd7urf1no...

>

>> I tried it.

>>

>> Yep, 3 clicks each. However Vista was noticeably slower even though the

>> hardware is much newer and faster.

>

> Must be you then. Mine was as instantaneous as XP....

 

What are you running? A CPU not invented yet with a $1000 video card?

 

When I right clicked, you could just hear the Vista nag on the hard drive.

A partial comment from you was "I figure if 300 lb. welfare mothers

with big hair". I wonder how many thousands of women you offended. Where

did you learn such bigotry? If you meant it as a joke I'm not laughing and I

don't think these women are laughing either. I think you owe these women an

apology. Are you man enough to provide it?

As far as the remainder of the comment goes: "100 lb redheads who smoke

a lot" is certainly insulting and "truck jockeys can use Vista" is an

implication that truck drivers are stupid. I think you owe these people an

apology also.

You should provide a description of yourself so that I and others can

know what a perfect person is supposed to be. We can then attempt to live

our lives in your image.

You could have said "If others" instead of the disgusting comments you

chose to use. Are you full of racism also? There's no place in a civil world

for attitudes such as yours. I'm not the "politeness" police but I'm more

than willing to criticize you for the use of unwanted and unnecessary

statements. If nobody else is willing to defend these people I'm certainly

willing to do it.

For those of you who wish to criticize me or lambast me for this reply

please feel free to do so. I'd like to know who you are.

 

C.B.

 

 

--

It is the responsibility and duty of everyone to help the underprivileged

and unfortunate among us.

 

"Earle Horton" <earleh_nospam_@live.com> wrote in message

news:E4719318-B315-425F-9F85-37C307A2D6BF@microsoft.com...

> Genie,

>

> If Gateway has XP drivers for your laptop, it should be a simple matter to

> install XP on it. I checked the support web pages for my Dell laptop, and

> it is all there for "downgrading" to XP, except for a copy of XP itself,

> which I already have. It also appears that Dell at least still gives you

> the option of XP or Vista pre-installed, although they recommend Vista.

> (I assume that's because Microsoft gives them a better deal on Vista,

> their "cut" is bigger.) I bought the Dell at WalMart and pre-installed

> Vista was all they had. Although it sucks big time I have come to an

> understanding with it. I figure if 300 lb. welfare mothers with big hair,

> 100 lb redheads who smoke a lot and truck jockeys can use Vista, I can

> too.

>

> Good luck,

>

> Earle

>

> "genie" <denie@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message

> news:6B828F07-7C07-45BA-B50D-BFB098B40494@microsoft.com...

>> the OS system just seems more complicated and you have to search for

>> everything.

>> On XP you can download the simply version of PhoneTools, but that is not

>> even compatible with Vista. From reading some of the other comments,

>> SnappyFax is not a very good program. Also, why would Microsoft supply a

>> fax/scan for businesses or the more expensive programs and not for the

>> everyday home owner?

>>

>> Also, you overlook the key word in my original email. the word is

>> "Novice".

>> I use a computer everyday in my job, but the programs are already on the

>> computer. And I have no problem at all. But I don't have to try to

>> figure

>> out which one is best and get a lot of extra stuff that in home use I

>> don't

>> need. XP supplied everything I needed without all the frills.

>>

>> Now Microsoft wants us to pay for things that was part of the XP program

>> and

>> figure out what we need.

>> gl

>>

>>

>> "Mike Hall - MVP" wrote:

>>

>>> "genie" <denie@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message

>>> news:C1263104-F8AA-457A-8764-FFE5B59DC9E9@microsoft.com...

>>> >I bought a new Gateway Laptop with Vista Home Premium already loaded.

>>> >If I

>>> > had a choice, I would never have Vista on this computer and if there

>>> > was

>>> > anyway to get it off and back to Windows XP Home Addition, I would if

>>> > it

>>> > didn't cost me an arm and leg. I am a novice and Vista appears to be

>>> > for

>>> > computer guru's. also I can't even fax from this program.

>>> >

>>> > I have written to Gateway suggesting they give you a choice.

>>> >

>>> > The largest school system in my state will not load Vista on our

>>> > computers

>>> > and I understand why.

>>> >

>>> > Any suggestions how to fax from this OS since it was included in XP.

>>> >

>>> >

>>> gl

>>>

>>>

>>> Try Snappy Fax.. http://www.snappysoftware.com

>>>

>>> What else can't you do that you could in XP?

>>>

>>>

>>> --

>>> Mike Hall - MVP

>>> How to construct a good post..

>>> http://dts-l.com/goodpost.htm

>>> How to use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups..

>>> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?pr=newswhelp&style=toc

>>> Mike's Window - My Blog..

>>> http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

he is running an imaginary vista that works and thats fast.. lol

 

Same category as bigfoot, the lochness monster, and the tooth fairy.

 

 

"Canuck57" <dave-no_spam@unixhome.net> wrote in message

news:lkuMj.50047$Cj7.19222@pd7urf2no...

>

> "Gordon" <gbplinux@gmail.com.invalid> wrote in message

> news:fttjr0$7sf$1@news.mixmin.net...

>> "Canuck57" <dave-no_spam@unixhome.net> wrote in message

>> news:GbsMj.178778$pM4.74389@pd7urf1no...

>>

>>> I tried it.

>>>

>>> Yep, 3 clicks each. However Vista was noticeably slower even though the

>>> hardware is much newer and faster.

>>

>> Must be you then. Mine was as instantaneous as XP....

>

> What are you running? A CPU not invented yet with a $1000 video card?

>

> When I right clicked, you could just hear the Vista nag on the hard drive.

>

"laugh at fanboy in the box" <terra@mas.mar> wrote in message

news:4802601b@newsgate.x-privat.org...

> You dont know how to count do you moron?

>

> Is not closing a window a click? or do you close the window telepathically

>

 

I can obviously count a bit more than you can. we are talking about getting

to the settings page, NOT closing a window AFTERWARDS.

 

Cretin

"Canuck57" <dave-no_spam@unixhome.net> wrote in message

news:lkuMj.50047$Cj7.19222@pd7urf2no...

>

> "Gordon" <gbplinux@gmail.com.invalid> wrote in message

> news:fttjr0$7sf$1@news.mixmin.net...

>> "Canuck57" <dave-no_spam@unixhome.net> wrote in message

>> news:GbsMj.178778$pM4.74389@pd7urf1no...

>>

>>> I tried it.

>>>

>>> Yep, 3 clicks each. However Vista was noticeably slower even though the

>>> hardware is much newer and faster.

>>

>> Must be you then. Mine was as instantaneous as XP....

>

> What are you running? A CPU not invented yet with a $1000 video card?

>

> When I right clicked, you could just hear the Vista nag on the hard drive.

>

 

 

Nope - an Intel Duo Core T2330......I say again, must be you.....

"laugh at fanboy in the box" <terra@mas.mar> wrote in message

news:4802737c$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...

> he is running an imaginary vista that works and thats fast.. lol

>

 

Like your "imaginary" brain....

"Frank" <fab@notspam.com> wrote in message

news:%23pHFDdZnIHA.5268@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

> Canuck57 wrote:

>> "Bob Campbell" <bob@bob.bob> wrote in message

>> news:QdidnR2739Qwtp_VnZ2dnUVZ_s-pnZ2d@supernews.com...

>>

>>>"philo" <philo@privacy.net> wrote in message

>>>news:%23MsPsxXnIHA.4208@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

>>>

>>>>>Really? I can right click on the desktop and get into my display

>>>>>properties right away?

>>>

>>>>LOL

>>>>

>>>>You have made a good point there

>>>

>>>The only point is that someone is clueless. Both XP and Vista take 3

>>>clicks from the desktop to get to the display properties "right away".

>>

>>

>> I tried it.

>>

>> Yep, 3 clicks each. However Vista was noticeably slower even though the

>> hardware is much newer and faster.

> I thought you said you got rid of Vista that was on your wife's laptop.

> So why are you here?

> Frank

 

No, you drank or shot up too much and forgot.

 

My wife refuses to use the Vista machine. She hates the new look and says

it is slow. Me, I didn't say a thing to her, in fact this was when I just

got it before I used it much. But after endless hours of frustration on

getting simple things to work, I realized Vista was a waste of my time.

 

But 16 days to Fedora 9. Once it is out, I will be wiping Vista off of the

new PC. Tried the Live Beta, sure looks good.

 

http://fedoraproject.org/

 

What am I doing hear? Real simple. Venting my disappointment in Vista and

warning others. Call it M$ withdrawal. Plus, dispelling the anti-Linux BS

that spill in. XP is liable to be my last production desktop from Microsoft

unless they wakeup and smell the coffee. They should offer us free

downgrades.

Frank wrote:

> laugh at the moron who knows nothing in the box wrote:

>

>> XP IS better in every way.

>

> Nope...it isn't!

> You don't know what you're talking about.

 

Very effective argument.

>>

>> Vista is clearly the windowsMe of NT.

>

> Nope, not even close...LOL!

> Frank

 

Convinced me.

 

[/sarcasm]

 

--

Peace!

Kurt

Former Self-anointed Moderator

microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea

"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"

yep Same category as bigfoot, the lochness monster, and the tooth fairy

 

just as I thought

 

there is no such thing as a fast vista.. unless you are using technology

from the future.

 

Time travel? And if you are capable of that, why are you still using vista

that's a piece of junk???

"Gordon" <gbplinux@gmail.com.invalid> wrote in message

news:fttski$eaa$1@news.mixmin.net...

> "Canuck57" <dave-no_spam@unixhome.net> wrote in message

> news:lkuMj.50047$Cj7.19222@pd7urf2no...

>>

>> "Gordon" <gbplinux@gmail.com.invalid> wrote in message

>> news:fttjr0$7sf$1@news.mixmin.net...

>>> "Canuck57" <dave-no_spam@unixhome.net> wrote in message

>>> news:GbsMj.178778$pM4.74389@pd7urf1no...

>>>

>>>> I tried it.

>>>>

>>>> Yep, 3 clicks each. However Vista was noticeably slower even though

>>>> the hardware is much newer and faster.

>>>

>>> Must be you then. Mine was as instantaneous as XP....

>>

>> What are you running? A CPU not invented yet with a $1000 video card?

>>

>> When I right clicked, you could just hear the Vista nag on the hard

>> drive.

>>

>

>

> Nope - an Intel Duo Core T2330......I say again, must be you.....

"kurttrail" <dontemailme@anywhereintheknownuniverse.org> wrote in message

news:YatMj.12107$vd4.1093@fe80.usenetserver.com...

> Frank wrote:

>

>> Canuck57 wrote:

>>> "Bob Campbell" <bob@bob.bob> wrote in message

>>> news:QdidnR2739Qwtp_VnZ2dnUVZ_s-pnZ2d@supernews.com...

>>>

>>>>"philo" <philo@privacy.net> wrote in message

>>>>news:%23MsPsxXnIHA.4208@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

>>>>

>>>>>>Really? I can right click on the desktop and get into my display

>>>>>>properties right away?

>>>>

>>>>>LOL

>>>>>

>>>>>You have made a good point there

>>>>

>>>>The only point is that someone is clueless. Both XP and Vista take 3

>>>>clicks from the desktop to get to the display properties "right away".

>>>

>>>

>>> I tried it.

>>>

>>> Yep, 3 clicks each. However Vista was noticeably slower even though

>>> the hardware is much newer and faster.

>>>

>>>

>> I thought you said you got rid of Vista that was on your wife's laptop.

>> So why are you here?

>> Frank

>

> Why not? Aren't people that have been unhappy with their Vista

> experience allowed to post here?

 

Oh, they are. And do it just to annoy Frank.

 

LOL.

i think in 10 days ubuntu 8.04 will be out too

 

 

"Canuck57" <dave-no_spam@unixhome.net> wrote in message

news:pCuMj.179078$pM4.115135@pd7urf1no...

>

> "Frank" <fab@notspam.com> wrote in message

> news:%23pHFDdZnIHA.5268@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>> Canuck57 wrote:

>>> "Bob Campbell" <bob@bob.bob> wrote in message

>>> news:QdidnR2739Qwtp_VnZ2dnUVZ_s-pnZ2d@supernews.com...

>>>

>>>>"philo" <philo@privacy.net> wrote in message

>>>>news:%23MsPsxXnIHA.4208@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

>>>>

>>>>>>Really? I can right click on the desktop and get into my display

>>>>>>properties right away?

>>>>

>>>>>LOL

>>>>>

>>>>>You have made a good point there

>>>>

>>>>The only point is that someone is clueless. Both XP and Vista take 3

>>>>clicks from the desktop to get to the display properties "right away".

>>>

>>>

>>> I tried it.

>>>

>>> Yep, 3 clicks each. However Vista was noticeably slower even though the

>>> hardware is much newer and faster.

>> I thought you said you got rid of Vista that was on your wife's laptop.

>> So why are you here?

>> Frank

>

> No, you drank or shot up too much and forgot.

>

> My wife refuses to use the Vista machine. She hates the new look and says

> it is slow. Me, I didn't say a thing to her, in fact this was when I just

> got it before I used it much. But after endless hours of frustration on

> getting simple things to work, I realized Vista was a waste of my time.

>

> But 16 days to Fedora 9. Once it is out, I will be wiping Vista off of

> the new PC. Tried the Live Beta, sure looks good.

>

> http://fedoraproject.org/

>

> What am I doing hear? Real simple. Venting my disappointment in Vista

> and warning others. Call it M$ withdrawal. Plus, dispelling the

> anti-Linux BS that spill in. XP is liable to be my last production

> desktop from Microsoft unless they wakeup and smell the coffee. They

> should offer us free downgrades.

>

laugh at fanboy in the box wrote:

>>You are known for being an idiot!

>

>

> And look who is saying this? Lol the biggest moron that has ever set foot on

> the vista.general newsgroup! lol

 

You can't even get one little install of Vista to run properly...who is

the idiot?

You are dipsh*t!

Frank

"Gordon" <gbplinux@gmail.com.invalid> wrote in message

news:fttajt$20s$1@news.mixmin.net...

> "Canuck57" <dave-no_spam@unixhome.net> wrote in message

> news:8dpMj.177937$pM4.80377@pd7urf1no...

>> XP is a better system for a production - business critical use.

>

> Can you elaborate? As a retired Systems Accountant I find NO DIFFERENCE in

> "productivity" between XP and Vista. Users just use Office in both OS's -

> it's NOT the Users's job to mess with the OS.

>

>> That is also why business adoption of Vista is near zero.

>

> As a Systems Accountant again, Vista has been out for just over a year.

> Many large corporations are now upgrading machines on a four year cycle as

> opposed to three and many just haven't reached the replacement date.

 

No, they are still loading XP Pro.

 

One site at a clients I just wrapped up with actually put a red bar across

the top of the web page to one of their major applications that said it

nicely:

 

"Vista (any version) is not supported by this system and any support for

Vista is not forthcoming. Please do not place any service calls for systems

running Vista as they will be ignored."

 

LOL when I saw that.

laugh at fanboy in the box wrote:

> yeah sure...

>

> whatever you say franky poo, your nurse told me not to upset you today

>

....hehehe...I'm not that frank you idiot...that must be your rooming

partner in the mental institution you're confined to...LOL!

Frank

Canuck57 wrote:

-------------------

So I was right...you don't have Vista.

Figures!

Frank

"Mike Hall - MVP" <mikehall@remove_mvps.com> wrote in message

news:%23oUcJjYnIHA.1768@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

> "Canuck57" <dave-no_spam@unixhome.net> wrote in message

> news:8dpMj.177937$pM4.80377@pd7urf1no...

>>

>> "genie" <denie@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message

>> news:C1263104-F8AA-457A-8764-FFE5B59DC9E9@microsoft.com...

>>>I bought a new Gateway Laptop with Vista Home Premium already loaded. If

>>>I

>>> had a choice, I would never have Vista on this computer and if there was

>>> anyway to get it off and back to Windows XP Home Addition, I would if it

>>> didn't cost me an arm and leg. I am a novice and Vista appears to be

>>> for

>>> computer guru's. also I can't even fax from this program.

>>>

>>> I have written to Gateway suggesting they give you a choice.

>>>

>>> The largest school system in my state will not load Vista on our

>>> computers

>>> and I understand why.

>>>

>>> Any suggestions how to fax from this OS since it was included in XP.

>>

>> Genie,

>>

>> Others suggest you buy add on packages for fax, this may or may not be

>> the way to go.

>>

>> $69 for a fax program seems like a lot. Plus relearning and installing.

>> Especially if you have to do this for say 3-4 programs like this.

>>

>> A better route _might_ be to consider a downgrade in the OS to XP. Most

>> local PC stores should be selling XP Home OEM for about $100. If you

>> have to upgrade 2 programs @ $69 then XP downgrade may be better and less

>> expensive as you also get the better performance and familiarity of XP.

>>

>> If you need drivers say for a sound card, you can go to the vendors site

>> and download/install them for free.

>>

>> Your assertion that Vista is for those that must have MS-NextToy is

>> correct. XP is a better system for a production - business critical use.

>> That is also why business adoption of Vista is near zero. And it is

>> likely business is going to skip Vista altogether like it did with WinMe.

>>

>

>

> Snappy Fax is $30!!

 

Ooops, sorry - you are right - $29 - I was looking at the server version.

 

Still, if you have to upgrade enough stuff, even if you like Vista, it may

be more economical to use XP.

I appear stupid only to morons.

 

A smart guy would recognize intelligence.

 

 

"Frank" <fab@notspam.com> wrote in message

news:OqDxkLanIHA.5268@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

> laugh at the idiot moron loser in the box wrote:

>

> ----------------------------------------------

>

> Are you really as stupid as you appear to be?

> Frank

Canuck57 wrote:

 

>

>

> Oh, they are. And do it just to annoy Frank.

>

> LOL.

>

>

You actually think it annoys me to watch you making a stupid fool out of

yourself on a daily basis...LOL!

It's actually priceless!!!

Fran

I have vista and thats why I know its crap..

 

actually most people that have vista know its crap because they have used

it.. lol

 

But look who is talking.. where is your proof that you have vista?.. for all

we know you are posting from a linux 486 with a vista theme...

 

 

"Frank" <fab@notspam.com> wrote in message

news:umKhRzanIHA.4292@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

> Canuck57 wrote:

> -------------------

> So I was right...you don't have Vista.

> Figures!

> Frank

laugh at fanboy in the box wrote:

> I appear stupid only to morons.

 

morons like you...LOL!

>

> A smart guy would recognize intelligence.

 

Yeah, your right and I certainly don't see any sign of intelligence in you!

Frank

Canuck57 wrote:

> "Mike Hall - MVP" <mikehall@remove_mvps.com> wrote in message

> news:%23oUcJjYnIHA.1768@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>

>>"Canuck57" <dave-no_spam@unixhome.net> wrote in message

>>news:8dpMj.177937$pM4.80377@pd7urf1no...

>>

>>>"genie" <denie@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message

>>>news:C1263104-F8AA-457A-8764-FFE5B59DC9E9@microsoft.com...

>>>

>>>>I bought a new Gateway Laptop with Vista Home Premium already loaded. If

>>>>I

>>>>had a choice, I would never have Vista on this computer and if there was

>>>>anyway to get it off and back to Windows XP Home Addition, I would if it

>>>>didn't cost me an arm and leg. I am a novice and Vista appears to be

>>>>for

>>>>computer guru's. also I can't even fax from this program.

>>>>

>>>>I have written to Gateway suggesting they give you a choice.

>>>>

>>>>The largest school system in my state will not load Vista on our

>>>>computers

>>>>and I understand why.

>>>>

>>>>Any suggestions how to fax from this OS since it was included in XP.

>>>

>>>Genie,

>>>

>>>Others suggest you buy add on packages for fax, this may or may not be

>>>the way to go.

>>>

>>>$69 for a fax program seems like a lot. Plus relearning and installing.

>>>Especially if you have to do this for say 3-4 programs like this.

>>>

>>>A better route _might_ be to consider a downgrade in the OS to XP. Most

>>>local PC stores should be selling XP Home OEM for about $100. If you

>>>have to upgrade 2 programs @ $69 then XP downgrade may be better and less

>>>expensive as you also get the better performance and familiarity of XP.

>>>

>>>If you need drivers say for a sound card, you can go to the vendors site

>>>and download/install them for free.

>>>

>>>Your assertion that Vista is for those that must have MS-NextToy is

>>>correct. XP is a better system for a production - business critical use.

>>>That is also why business adoption of Vista is near zero. And it is

>>>likely business is going to skip Vista altogether like it did with WinMe.

>>>

>>

>>

>>Snappy Fax is $30!!

>

>

> Ooops, sorry - you are right - $29 - I was looking at the server version.

>

> Still, if you have to upgrade enough stuff, even if you like Vista, it may

> be more economical to use XP.

>

>

No, just purchase the correct version of Vista first time around.

Frank

laugh at fanboy in the box wrote:

> I have vista and thats why I know its crap..

 

You know nothing and I'm wasn't talking to you.

Frank

On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 14:15:41 -0700, Frank <fab@notspam.com> wrote:

>laugh at fanboy in the box wrote:

>

>>>You are known for being an idiot!

>>

>>

>> And look who is saying this? Lol the biggest moron that has ever set foot on

>> the vista.general newsgroup! lol

>

>You can't even get one little install of Vista to run properly...who is

>the idiot?

>You are dipsh*t!

>Frank

 

Frank's last resort and desperate comment he's used hundreds of times.

On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 14:49:03 -0700, Frank <fab@notspam.com> wrote:

>laugh at fanboy in the box wrote:

>> I have vista and thats why I know its crap..

>

>You know nothing and I'm wasn't talking to you.

>Frank

 

 

Classic Frank the moron speak "I'm wasn't".

 

Yes you are Frank.

 

ROTFLMAO!