The WTF Starts Now

July 26, 200717 yr

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:00:57 -0700, Frank <fb@nospaner.cnm> wrote:

>Adam Albright wrote:

>

>>>

>>>-Michael

>>

>> The fanboy club is hung up on "looks black" and according to RGB specs

>> what is suppose to be called black. The whole exercise is pointless

>> because I know of no professional that uses his computer for graphic

>> work that uses RGB color space IF the work he is doing gets off the

>> computer into the real world and is viewed on another medium like

>> commercial printing, (that's CMYK color space based on inks) or video

>> which I do a lot of that based on NTSC specs.

>

>Ummm...who said we use RGB for out putting printer ready files? Only an

>idiot would think that.

Stop dancing Frankie. You're the Bozo that kept making reference to

RGB 100,0,0. Of course you did that to pick on Alias. Want to pretend

otherwise give it your best shot.

>We do a lot of color correction work in LAB space and of course every

>file must be converted to CMYK for the printer.

Funny, you only mention that AFTER I mentioned it. Just like you

parrot other things I informed you about. Only after you hear me say

something, then you repeat it. You're a phony Frank.

Quote

Mark as Solution

July 26, 200717 yr

Frank wrote:

> norm wrote:

>

>>>

>> That is how mine looks too (black), but Frank disagrees,

>

> I haven't seen your taskbar have I? so how could I disagree?

>

> as he has been

>> "in the biz" for years. Frank cannot admit that anyone who dares

>> disagree with his "experience" or "knowledge" might be correct.

>

> Try referring to the subject matter and not some supposed subject

> matter. My replies have only been to the referenced taskbar .jpg posted

> by alias. It that too difficult for you to comprehend?

>

> I

>> wonder, were Frank to choose "high contrast black" from the available

>> choices in color schemes, how he would "define" that color?

>

> Black is black. RGB 0,0,0 is black. RGB 100,0,0 the color reading taken

> from the top portion of the fountain filled Vista taskbar referenced

> .jpg is not black. Is that, that difficult for you to understand?

>

> Would it be black, or something other than what it is stated as being?

>

> If I chose to run "high contrast" black I'd expect it to be black.

> Wouldn't you?

> Frank

>

Frank, my first comment on this issue was related strictly to your very

first reply to Alias about the color black in vista. You said, and I quote:

"Vista doesn't have any black in it." Frank

Yet vista has "high color black" in the available choices in color

schemes, and when asked " Would it be black, or something other than

what it is stated as being?", you replied above:

"If I chose to run "high contrast" black I'd expect it to be black.

Wouldn't you?" Frank

So, please explain yourself once more. Does vista have black in it?

Remember, your credence is again on the line, so be very careful how you

reply. No wiggle worming, no lectures on colors, nothing about your

business, your status, your intelligence or anything else. Just give us

nothing but the truth and the whole truth. lol

--

norm

Quote

Mark as Solution

July 26, 200717 yr

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:07:27 -0700, Frank <fb@nospaner.cnm> wrote:

>norm wrote:

>

>>>

>> That is how mine looks too (black), but Frank disagrees,

>

>I haven't seen your taskbar have I? so how could I disagree?

Again you being the idiot you are totally miss the point you

pathetically dumb Bozo! Let me explain it to you in real simple terms

even some runt like you may hopefully grasp parts of.

You nagged and nagged Alias when he made some reference to a image

that to him parts of looked black. So Alias posted a link to this

image. Get it? He didn't email it to you or provide an attachment. So

you viewed in on YOUR computer and he is viewing it on his. OF COURSE

there can be perceived difference since neither of us knows what gamma

value HIS monitor is set to or yours or if either of yours is PROPERLY

calibrated. Yet you always being the stumbling ass you always are you

climb up on a stack of bibles and insist that you're right and

everyone else is wrong. That's what you do. That's what you always do

in every thread. Only after I started to explain how gamma plays a

role did you start to back away from your original claim. You are

nothing but a liar and I nail your sorry ass to the wall every time I

make the effort to expose you as nothing but a clueless buffoon and

fraud.

>

>as he has been

>> "in the biz" for years. Frank cannot admit that anyone who dares

>> disagree with his "experience" or "knowledge" might be correct.

>

>Try referring to the subject matter and not some supposed subject

>matter. My replies have only been to the referenced taskbar .jpg posted

>by alias. It that too difficult for you to comprehend?

And as usual you were dead wrong jumping to conclusions.

>

>> I wonder, were Frank to choose "high contrast black" from the available

>> choices in color schemes, how he would "define" that color?

I asked the idiot that already. Stone silence.

>

>Black is black. RGB 0,0,0 is black. RGB 100,0,0 the color reading taken

>from the top portion of the fountain filled Vista taskbar referenced

>.jpg is not black. Is that, that difficult for you to understand?

Not so fast Bozo. You claimed not once, but over and over that the

Vista GUI was incapable of producing black. Those are you words. If

you force me to look up your posts at Google I assure you I will make

you choke on them.

Quote

Mark as Solution

July 26, 200717 yr

norm wrote:

> Frank wrote:

>

>> norm wrote:

>>

>>>>

>>> That is how mine looks too (black), but Frank disagrees,

>>

>> I haven't seen your taskbar have I? so how could I disagree?

>>

>> as he has been

>>

>>> "in the biz" for years. Frank cannot admit that anyone who dares

>>> disagree with his "experience" or "knowledge" might be correct.

>>

>> Try referring to the subject matter and not some supposed subject

>> matter. My replies have only been to the referenced taskbar .jpg

>> posted by alias. It that too difficult for you to comprehend?

>>

>> I

>>

>>> wonder, were Frank to choose "high contrast black" from the available

>>> choices in color schemes, how he would "define" that color?

>>

>> Black is black. RGB 0,0,0 is black. RGB 100,0,0 the color reading

>> taken from the top portion of the fountain filled Vista taskbar

>> referenced .jpg is not black. Is that, that difficult for you to

>> understand?

>>

>> Would it be black, or something other than what it is stated as being?

>>

>> If I chose to run "high contrast" black I'd expect it to be black.

>> Wouldn't you?

>> Frank

>>

> Frank, my first comment on this issue was related strictly to your very

> first reply to Alias about the color black in vista. You said, and I quote:

> "Vista doesn't have any black in it." Frank

> Yet vista has "high color black" in the available choices in color

> schemes, and when asked " Would it be black, or something other than

> what it is stated as being?", you replied above:

> "If I chose to run "high contrast" black I'd expect it to be black.

> Wouldn't you?" Frank

> So, please explain yourself once more. Does vista have black in it?

> Remember, your credence is again on the line, so be very careful how you

> reply. No wiggle worming, no lectures on colors, nothing about your

> business, your status, your intelligence or anything else. Just give us

> nothing but the truth and the whole truth. lol

>

Nice try norm but no cigar.

I said the Vista GUI doesn't have any black in it..and I was strictly

referring to the referenced jpg he posted.

It that too difficult for you to comprehend or understand?

Frank

Quote

Mark as Solution

July 26, 200717 yr

Adam Albright wrote:

>

> Stop dancing Frankie. You're the Bozo that kept making reference to

> RGB 100,0,0. Of course you did that to pick on Alias. Want to pretend

> otherwise give it your best shot.

>

How stupid are you? The color dropper reading I got from the fountain

filled taskbar posted by alias was RGB 100.0.0.

Now show me where I mentioned anything at all about printing the damn

thing?

You're so stupid as to be unbelievable anymore!

What the hell is on your mind?

>>We do a lot of color correction work in LAB space and of course every

>>file must be converted to CMYK for the printer.

>

> Funny, you only mention that AFTER I mentioned it.

You mentioned LAB color space? Bullsh*t! Where?

Show me..right now!!!

You don't even know what that is do you?

Just like you

> parrot other things I informed you about.

You haven't informed me about a damn thing except to prove me and to

this entire ng that you're an idiot as*hole know nothing bigmouth liar!

Only after you hear me say

> something, then you repeat it. You're a phony Frank.

>

Hey you dumb ass drunk, I've said many times before that only CMYK files

go to the printer. Any first week graphics student knows that.

You're really an idiot...a true moron and most likely a drunken sod!

Get a life bozo.

Frank

Quote

Mark as Solution

July 26, 200717 yr

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:31:40 -0700, Frank <fb@nospaner.cnm> wrote:

>Gary wrote:

>

>> You really have no idea about the difference between transmitted and

>> reflected light do you.

>> Stick you big nose into your monitor what do you see. Oh surprise R,B,G if

>> any of those Red, Blue, Or Green have a value of more then 0 guess what numb

>> nuts it isn't black is it?

>>

>

>hahaha...that's funny! :-)

>Frank

The both of you are funny in your absolute ignorance on so many

topics.

Quote

Mark as Solution

July 26, 200717 yr

Adam Albright wrote:

>

> Not so fast Bozo. You claimed not once, but over and over that the

> Vista GUI was incapable of producing black.

You're a drunken lying son of a bitch! I never, ever said that Vista GUI

was incapable of producing black color. I said that the posted jpg did

not have any black in the taskbar.

It is really difficult for you to be wrong isn't it?

Those are you words.

Look it up pal and post it RIGHT NOW!!! GOT THAT!

RIGHT NOW...or else stick you're loser tail between your legs and run

off in total defeat.

RIGHT NOW!!!

Well...?

I'm waiting...!

If

> you force me to look up your posts at Google I assure you I will make

> you choke on them.

>

Do it you drunken moron!

RIGHT NOW!!!

I'm waiting...

Well...?

Frank

Quote

Mark as Solution

July 26, 200717 yr

PROVE that what I told you is incorrect. Until then your just making a idiot

out of yourself.

"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

news:2d9ia3lgitb6681hngnpquv9ib96pj82a3@4ax.com...

> On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:31:40 -0700, Frank <fb@nospaner.cnm> wrote:

>

>>Gary wrote:

>>

>>> You really have no idea about the difference between transmitted and

>>> reflected light do you.

>>> Stick you big nose into your monitor what do you see. Oh surprise R,B,G

>>> if

>>> any of those Red, Blue, Or Green have a value of more then 0 guess what

>>> numb

>>> nuts it isn't black is it?

>>>

>>

>>hahaha...that's funny! :-)

>>Frank

>

> The both of you are funny in your absolute ignorance on so many

> topics.

>

Quote

Mark as Solution

July 26, 200717 yr

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:36:10 -0700, Frank <fb@nospaner.cnm> wrote:

>norm wrote:

>

>> Frank wrote:

>>

>>> norm wrote:

>>>

>>>>>

>>>> That is how mine looks too (black), but Frank disagrees,

>>>

>>> I haven't seen your taskbar have I? so how could I disagree?

>>>

>>> as he has been

>>>

>>>> "in the biz" for years. Frank cannot admit that anyone who dares

>>>> disagree with his "experience" or "knowledge" might be correct.

>>>

>>> Try referring to the subject matter and not some supposed subject

>>> matter. My replies have only been to the referenced taskbar .jpg

>>> posted by alias. It that too difficult for you to comprehend?

>>>

>>> I

>>>

>>>> wonder, were Frank to choose "high contrast black" from the available

>>>> choices in color schemes, how he would "define" that color?

>>>

>>> Black is black. RGB 0,0,0 is black. RGB 100,0,0 the color reading

>>> taken from the top portion of the fountain filled Vista taskbar

>>> referenced .jpg is not black. Is that, that difficult for you to

>>> understand?

>>>

>>> Would it be black, or something other than what it is stated as being?

>>>

>>> If I chose to run "high contrast" black I'd expect it to be black.

>>> Wouldn't you?

>>> Frank

>>>

>> Frank, my first comment on this issue was related strictly to your very

>> first reply to Alias about the color black in vista. You said, and I quote:

>> "Vista doesn't have any black in it." Frank

>> Yet vista has "high color black" in the available choices in color

>> schemes, and when asked " Would it be black, or something other than

>> what it is stated as being?", you replied above:

>> "If I chose to run "high contrast" black I'd expect it to be black.

>> Wouldn't you?" Frank

>> So, please explain yourself once more. Does vista have black in it?

>> Remember, your credence is again on the line, so be very careful how you

>> reply. No wiggle worming, no lectures on colors, nothing about your

>> business, your status, your intelligence or anything else. Just give us

>> nothing but the truth and the whole truth. lol

>>

>

>Nice try norm but no cigar.

>I said the Vista GUI doesn't have any black in it..and I was strictly

>referring to the referenced jpg he posted.

>It that too difficult for you to comprehend or understand?

>Frank

You're lying your sh*t encrusted ass off again like you always do

Frankie. Even when your own quote is just a handful of lines above you

actually LIE about what anyone can see for themselves you actually

said. It takes a special kind of idiot to be you Frankie. Really.

I guess you forgot how I nailed you sorry ass.

Right click on desktop. Personalize, Windows color and appearances.

Open Classic appearance properties for more color options, select

either white or black high contrast.

Now watch Frankie try to pretend changing your desktop chrome isn't

part of the GUI. You made NO reference to Alias's JPG in the many

times you were whining "Vista's GUI doesn't have any black in it".

Quote

Mark as Solution

July 26, 200717 yr

I would be glad if my problems stoped on the incompatibility issues

since at this point in time (july 2007) most of things are already

compatible (safe NVIDIA, but that is because they are too inconpetent to

write a working driver so I don't blame Microsoft for this)...

The thing that bugs me the most are the things that keep missing from

my computer... first my start programs vanished, then my system folders

faded into the pretty moving wallpapper... and now my shortcuts are

getting boken and some of the bundled programs (Snipping Tool for

instance) decide when they work and when don't....

Its getting to my nerves, BUT I am perssisting because "its really

pretty", and as a designer, I like polish visuals on my work enviroment.

But still, 2 weeks fighting the ugly beast, and getting closer to

abandon my 200US$ investment to rot on the drawer by the second.

--

*711

Quote

Mark as Solution

July 26, 200717 yr

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:47:59 -0700, Frank <fb@nospaner.cnm> wrote:

>Adam Albright wrote:

>

>>

>> Stop dancing Frankie. You're the Bozo that kept making reference to

>> RGB 100,0,0. Of course you did that to pick on Alias. Want to pretend

>> otherwise give it your best shot.

>>

>

>How stupid are you? The color dropper reading I got from the fountain

>filled taskbar posted by alias was RGB 100.0.0.

Bingo! The color dropper reading YOU got! Not what I got. I don't need

to add I have tons more creditability then you do, plus anyone could

have easily checked themselves. How come nobody yet has stepped

forward to backup your claim of RGB 100,0,0?

My guess, because while you claim to be an expert, that's you run some

business, you run a marketing company, blah, blah, blah, you keep

posting garbage that exposes you both as a liar and dummy.

BTW dummy I've been letting you make the same mistake over and over

just so you can't deny you said it. You keep referring to "fountain

fill" you have claimed you have Photoshop. There is no such named

feature in Photoshop, buy is the in cheap knock off Paint Shop Pro.

Photoshop uses the more accurate term gradient fill.

Why do you lie about everything?

>>>We do a lot of color correction work in LAB space and of course every

>>>file must be converted to CMYK for the printer.

>>

>> Funny, you only mention that AFTER I mentioned it.

>

>You mentioned LAB color space? Bullsh*t! Where?

>Show me..right now!!!

No, you fuc*ing dickh*ead, YOU injected LAB color, not me.

>You don't even know what that is do you?

That's funny. Again anybody that wants to waste time checking can see

you and other fanboys starting to use terms ONLY after I've explained

them. Too funny!

>

> Just like you

>> parrot other things I informed you about.

>

>You haven't informed me about a damn thing except to prove me and to

>this entire ng that you're an idiot as*hole know nothing bigmouth liar!

Google proves you a liar on that too.

>

> Only after you hear me say

>> something, then you repeat it. You're a phony Frank.

>>

>

>Hey you dumb ass drunk, I've said many times before that only CMYK files

>go to the printer. Any first week graphics student knows that.

>You're really an idiot...a true moron and most likely a drunken sod!

>Get a life bozo.

I noticed the more I expose you the louder you protest. Too bad.

Quote

Mark as Solution

July 26, 200717 yr

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:00:42 -0700, "Gary" <Gary@somewhere.usa> wrote:

>This coming from the person who doesn't know the difference between

>transmitted and reflected light.

Did you learn how to make goofy Strawmen from Frankie?

>

>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

>news:mh0ia3141alrrv9j13j6e90pvebcfs1b93@4ax.com...

>> On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:14:56 -0700, "Gary" <Gary@somewhere.usa> wrote:

>>

>>>Yes Ubunto is a toy os.

>>>I think that my previous post was too complex for you.

>>

>> And you act like a child poster having a temper tantrum. Post again

>> when you can act like some responsible adult.

>>

>

Quote

Mark as Solution

July 26, 200717 yr

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:13:01 -0700, "Gary" <Gary@somewhere.usa> wrote:

>You really have no idea about the difference between transmitted and

>reflected light do you.

>Stick you big nose into your monitor what do you see. Oh surprise R,B,G if

>any of those Red, Blue, Or Green have a value of more then 0 guess what numb

>nuts it isn't black is it?

Write this down so you don't look as stupid next time. Monitors

neither have to be nor always are calibrated to RGB color space. So

your premise is bogus. You need a better teacher then Frankie. He's a

hoot to read, but technically he's behind your average ten year old.

Quote

Mark as Solution

July 26, 200717 yr

Write this down so you don't look like a fool Computer Monitors use RGB in

there displays.

What a dumb ass.

"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

news:6dbia3pkjtb139vf7u47uv6lp0irhhc2m7@4ax.com...

> On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:13:01 -0700, "Gary" <Gary@somewhere.usa> wrote:

>

>>You really have no idea about the difference between transmitted and

>>reflected light do you.

>>Stick you big nose into your monitor what do you see. Oh surprise R,B,G if

>>any of those Red, Blue, Or Green have a value of more then 0 guess what

>>numb

>>nuts it isn't black is it?

>

> Write this down so you don't look as stupid next time. Monitors

> neither have to be nor always are calibrated to RGB color space. So

> your premise is bogus. You need a better teacher then Frankie. He's a

> hoot to read, but technically he's behind your average ten year old.

>

Quote

Mark as Solution

July 26, 200717 yr

Couldn't come up with the difference could you.

"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

news:o9bia39qgbn2ob2ag73cihanrb69pps50a@4ax.com...

> On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:00:42 -0700, "Gary" <Gary@somewhere.usa> wrote:

>

>>This coming from the person who doesn't know the difference between

>>transmitted and reflected light.

>

> Did you learn how to make goofy Strawmen from Frankie?

>>

>>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

>>news:mh0ia3141alrrv9j13j6e90pvebcfs1b93@4ax.com...

>>> On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:14:56 -0700, "Gary" <Gary@somewhere.usa> wrote:

>>>

>>>>Yes Ubunto is a toy os.

>>>>I think that my previous post was too complex for you.

>>>

>>> And you act like a child poster having a temper tantrum. Post again

>>> when you can act like some responsible adult.

>>>

>>

>

Quote

Mark as Solution

July 26, 200717 yr

Adam Albright wrote:

>

> Bingo! The color dropper reading YOU got! Not what I got. I don't need

> to add I have tons more creditability then you do, plus anyone could

> have easily checked themselves. How come nobody yet has stepped

> forward to backup your claim of RGB 100,0,0?

I guess only you are having a rage fit other this non-issue? Anyway,

depending on where you color sample in the fountain fill will determine

what exact RGB numbers you get. Can you understand that statement?

>

> My guess, because while you claim to be an expert, that's you run some

> business, you run a marketing company, blah, blah, blah, you keep

> posting garbage that exposes you both as a liar and dummy.

>

> BTW dummy I've been letting you make the same mistake over and over

> just so you can't deny you said it. You keep referring to "fountain

> fill" you have claimed you have Photoshop. There is no such named

> feature in Photoshop, buy is the in cheap knock off Paint Shop Pro.

> Photoshop uses the more accurate term gradient fill.

Sorry to burst your bubble stupid, but that's a common term used

(fountain fill, gradient fill, they're are interchangeable terms) in the

business.... Fountain fill comes from Corel not PSP. But Corel now owns

PSP so they might have started to use it. You didn't know that did you?

We don't use PSP in our biz.

We primarily use Corel Draw X3 and Adobe CS3 Master Collection. The eye

dropper was quicker in Corel, so I used it. Is that a problem for you?

> Why do you lie about everything?

>

Excuse me! If you only would learn to read and learn to comprehend what

you've just read you'd see that I'VE NEVER, EVER LIED TO YOU SWEETHEART!

Now go look everything up on google so you can respond intelligently, ok?

The more I corner your little rat like arse the more you're turning into

some kind of weirdo, sicko, wacko rage idiot.

Am I getting under your thin ignorant skin?

Frank

Quote

Mark as Solution

July 26, 200717 yr

Frank wrote:

> norm wrote:

>

>> Frank wrote:

>>

>>> norm wrote:

>>>

>>>>>

>>>> That is how mine looks too (black), but Frank disagrees,

>>>

>>> I haven't seen your taskbar have I? so how could I disagree?

>>>

>>> as he has been

>>>

>>>> "in the biz" for years. Frank cannot admit that anyone who dares

>>>> disagree with his "experience" or "knowledge" might be correct.

>>>

>>> Try referring to the subject matter and not some supposed subject

>>> matter. My replies have only been to the referenced taskbar .jpg

>>> posted by alias. It that too difficult for you to comprehend?

>>>

>>> I

>>>

>>>> wonder, were Frank to choose "high contrast black" from the

>>>> available choices in color schemes, how he would "define" that color?

>>>

>>> Black is black. RGB 0,0,0 is black. RGB 100,0,0 the color reading

>>> taken from the top portion of the fountain filled Vista taskbar

>>> referenced .jpg is not black. Is that, that difficult for you to

>>> understand?

>>>

>>> Would it be black, or something other than what it is stated as being?

>>>

>>> If I chose to run "high contrast" black I'd expect it to be black.

>>> Wouldn't you?

>>> Frank

>>>

>> Frank, my first comment on this issue was related strictly to your

>> very first reply to Alias about the color black in vista. You said,

>> and I quote:

>> "Vista doesn't have any black in it." Frank

>> Yet vista has "high color black" in the available choices in color

>> schemes, and when asked " Would it be black, or something other than

>> what it is stated as being?", you replied above:

>> "If I chose to run "high contrast" black I'd expect it to be black.

>> Wouldn't you?" Frank

>> So, please explain yourself once more. Does vista have black in it?

>> Remember, your credence is again on the line, so be very careful how

>> you reply. No wiggle worming, no lectures on colors, nothing about

>> your business, your status, your intelligence or anything else. Just

>> give us nothing but the truth and the whole truth. lol

>>

>

> Nice try norm but no cigar.

> I said the Vista GUI doesn't have any black in it..and I was strictly

> referring to the referenced jpg he posted.

> It that too difficult for you to comprehend or understand?

> Frank

>

At the time I made my original inquiry, the .jpg you cite had not yet

been posted. Is THAT too difficult for YOU to comprehend or understand?

--

norm

Quote

Mark as Solution

July 27, 200717 yr

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:56:37 -0700, Frank <fb@nospaner.cnm> wrote:

>Adam Albright wrote:

>

>>

>> Not so fast Bozo. You claimed not once, but over and over that the

>> Vista GUI was incapable of producing black.

>

>You're a drunken lying son of a bitch! I never, ever said that Vista GUI

>was incapable of producing black color. I said that the posted jpg did

>not have any black in the taskbar.

>It is really difficult for you to be wrong isn't it?

Yes, because I am rarely wrong as you've discovered.

You've claimed that the Vista GUI can't produce black, you were proven

wrong. You also claimed Vista doesn't have any black in it. An EXACT

quote.

See it right here fool:

.................................................................................

>>>>>>>"Frank" <fb@nospamer.cmn> wrote in message

>>>>>>>news:%23fnihCmzHHA.3848@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>You can set the color to anything you like, even Vista Black.

>>>>>>>>>Black crap means you're constipated, yaknow, like Vista. It's not

>>>>>>>>>crap. You just can't see that the times are changing and, like an

>>>>>>>>>old woman, have to cling to the past.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>Alias

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>Vista doesn't have any black in it.

.................................................................................

>

>Those are you words.

>

>Look it up pal and post it RIGHT NOW!!! GOT THAT!

>RIGHT NOW...or else stick you're loser tail between your legs and run

>off in total defeat.

>RIGHT NOW!!!

>Well...?

>I'm waiting...!

Idiot!

>

>If you force me to look up your posts at Google I assure you I will make

>> you choke on them.

>>

>Do it you drunken moron!

>RIGHT NOW!!!

>I'm waiting...

Wait not more Frankie. I did. LOL!

>Well...?

What a doofus!

Quote

Mark as Solution

July 27, 200717 yr

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:59:07 -0700, "Gary" <Gary@somewhere.usa> wrote:

>PROVE that what I told you is incorrect. Until then your just making a idiot

>out of yourself.

I never understand why idiots that post Strawmen NEVER seem to

understand why they get turned around to expose them as fools.

Learn boy, learn!

>

>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

>news:2d9ia3lgitb6681hngnpquv9ib96pj82a3@4ax.com...

>> On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:31:40 -0700, Frank <fb@nospaner.cnm> wrote:

>>

>>>Gary wrote:

>>>

>>>> You really have no idea about the difference between transmitted and

>>>> reflected light do you.

>>>> Stick you big nose into your monitor what do you see. Oh surprise R,B,G

>>>> if

>>>> any of those Red, Blue, Or Green have a value of more then 0 guess what

>>>> numb

>>>> nuts it isn't black is it?

>>>>

>>>

>>>hahaha...that's funny! :-)

>>>Frank

>>

>> The both of you are funny in your absolute ignorance on so many

>> topics.

>>

>

Quote

Mark as Solution

July 27, 200717 yr

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 16:46:05 -0700, "Gary" <Gary@somewhere.usa> wrote:

>Write this down so you don't look like a fool Computer Monitors use RGB in

>there displays.

>What a dumb ass.

Maybe in you narrow little world dummy.

>

>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

>news:6dbia3pkjtb139vf7u47uv6lp0irhhc2m7@4ax.com...

>> On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:13:01 -0700, "Gary" <Gary@somewhere.usa> wrote:

>>

>>>You really have no idea about the difference between transmitted and

>>>reflected light do you.

>>>Stick you big nose into your monitor what do you see. Oh surprise R,B,G if

>>>any of those Red, Blue, Or Green have a value of more then 0 guess what

>>>numb

>>>nuts it isn't black is it?

>>

>> Write this down so you don't look as stupid next time. Monitors

>> neither have to be nor always are calibrated to RGB color space. So

>> your premise is bogus. You need a better teacher then Frankie. He's a

>> hoot to read, but technically he's behind your average ten year old.

>>

>

Quote

Mark as Solution

July 27, 200717 yr

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 16:46:57 -0700, "Gary" <Gary@somewhere.usa> wrote:

>Couldn't come up with the difference could you.

>

I've been slapping you silly every time you dumb enough to post.

>

>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

>news:o9bia39qgbn2ob2ag73cihanrb69pps50a@4ax.com...

>> On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:00:42 -0700, "Gary" <Gary@somewhere.usa> wrote:

>>

>>>This coming from the person who doesn't know the difference between

>>>transmitted and reflected light.

>>

>> Did you learn how to make goofy Strawmen from Frankie?

>>>

>>>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

>>>news:mh0ia3141alrrv9j13j6e90pvebcfs1b93@4ax.com...

>>>> On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:14:56 -0700, "Gary" <Gary@somewhere.usa> wrote:

>>>>

>>>>>Yes Ubunto is a toy os.

>>>>>I think that my previous post was too complex for you.

>>>>

>>>> And you act like a child poster having a temper tantrum. Post again

>>>> when you can act like some responsible adult.

>>>>

>>>

>>

>

Quote

Mark as Solution

July 27, 200717 yr

Gary wrote:

> And its available at your local Toys are Us store.

It's available on line and at discerning computer shops. Vista is

available at Walmart and Best Buy alongside Norton and McAfee.

Alias

>

> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.li> wrote in message

> news:%23uQplV6zHHA.4184@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>> Frank wrote:

>>> Alias wrote:

>>>

>>>> Lang Murphy wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.li> wrote in message

>>>>> news:ucgKG8dzHHA.5052@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

>>>>>

>>>>>> Lang Murphy wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanonymous.info> wrote in message

>>>>>>> news:OQLEp64yHHA.3564@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Lang Murphy wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> <msnews.microsoft.com> wrote in message

>>>>>>>>> news:eg0OpFCyHHA.4896@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> I think Microsoft should change "The WOW Starts Now" to "The WTF

>>>>>>>>>> Starts Now". After only one day of using Vista I've come to the

>>>>>>>>>> realization that it simply wont work for me. All of my hardware

>>>>>>>>>> is supported, however, most of the applications I require on a day

>>>>>>>>>> to day basis would not run (or install). I've been doing a lot of

>>>>>>>>>> reading regarding these type situations and it seems more people

>>>>>>>>>> are dissatisfied with Vista than there are who actually like the

>>>>>>>>>> new OS. Yea, it's pretty... but whats the use if there is a ton of

>>>>>>>>>> software that just wont function. Frustrating.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> What a waste of bandwidth... not the orignal post, but the

>>>>>>>>> unbelievable amount of personal attacks that followed.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> What a waste...

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Lang

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> You can thank Frank for that.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Alias

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> As if you're not party to the nature of these threads. Funny!

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Lang

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Can you count? Frank jumps on each and every one of my posts. He does

>>>>>> the same with Adam.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Alias

>>>>>

>>>>> C'mon... that's no answer... the question remains you don't consider

>>>>> yourself party to the nature of these threads? I see you and Frank

>>>>> going back and forth for tens of posts following this one... so you're

>>>>> saying Frank's to blame for your OT posts in this ng? Uh... no?

>>>>>

>>>>> Lang

>>>>

>>>> Yes, I am a party to these threads but not as much as Frank is. How come

>>>> you're not jumping on Frank?

>>>>

>>>> Alias

>>>

>>> You just do get it do you? You have the audacity to come into this Vista

>>> ng and do nothing but slam MS and Vista, which you don't have then openly

>>> promote linux and wonder why people don't like or respect you?

>>> Are you that crass and clueless?

>>> I guess so, huh. As you have been asked and told not to do it yet you

>>> have no respect at all for others or the fact that your promoting another

>>> os in this ng is not, repeat is not, acceptable.

>>> But you simple don't care. Talk about not having any class at all.

>>> You're the prime example pal.

>>> Frank

>> YAWN. http://www.ubuntu.com/, better than Vista or XP.

>>

>> Alias

>

Quote

Mark as Solution

July 27, 200717 yr

Frank wrote:

> Alias wrote:

>

>> Frank wrote:

>>

>>> Alias wrote:

>>>

>>>> Lang Murphy wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.li> wrote in message

>>>>> news:ucgKG8dzHHA.5052@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

>>>>>

>>>>>> Lang Murphy wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanonymous.info> wrote in message

>>>>>>> news:OQLEp64yHHA.3564@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Lang Murphy wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> <msnews.microsoft.com> wrote in message

>>>>>>>>> news:eg0OpFCyHHA.4896@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> I think Microsoft should change "The WOW Starts Now" to "The

>>>>>>>>>> WTF Starts Now". After only one day of using Vista I've come

>>>>>>>>>> to the realization that it simply wont work for me. All of my

>>>>>>>>>> hardware is supported, however, most of the applications I

>>>>>>>>>> require on a day to day basis would not run (or install).

>>>>>>>>>> I've been doing a lot of reading regarding these type

>>>>>>>>>> situations and it seems more people are dissatisfied with

>>>>>>>>>> Vista than there are who actually like the new OS. Yea, it's

>>>>>>>>>> pretty... but whats the use if there is a ton of software that

>>>>>>>>>> just wont function. Frustrating.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> What a waste of bandwidth... not the orignal post, but the

>>>>>>>>> unbelievable amount of personal attacks that followed.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> What a waste...

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Lang

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> You can thank Frank for that.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Alias

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> As if you're not party to the nature of these threads. Funny!

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Lang

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Can you count? Frank jumps on each and every one of my posts. He

>>>>>> does the same with Adam.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Alias

>>>>>

>>>>> C'mon... that's no answer... the question remains you don't

>>>>> consider yourself party to the nature of these threads? I see you

>>>>> and Frank going back and forth for tens of posts following this

>>>>> one... so you're saying Frank's to blame for your OT posts in this

>>>>> ng? Uh... no?

>>>>>

>>>>> Lang

>>>>

>>>> Yes, I am a party to these threads but not as much as Frank is. How

>>>> come you're not jumping on Frank?

>>>>

>>>> Alias

>>>

>>> You just do get it do you? You have the audacity to come into this

>>> Vista ng and do nothing but slam MS and Vista, which you don't have

>>> then openly promote linux and wonder why people don't like or respect

>>> you?

>>> Are you that crass and clueless?

>>> I guess so, huh. As you have been asked and told not to do it yet you

>>> have no respect at all for others or the fact that your promoting

>>> another os in this ng is not, repeat is not, acceptable.

>>> But you simple don't care. Talk about not having any class at all.

>>> You're the prime example pal.

>>> Frank

>>

>> YAWN. http://www.ubuntu.com/, better than Vista or XP.

>>

>> Alias

>

> You just proved my point.

As if.