On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 09:03:02 -0700, Frank <fb@nospamer.cmn> wrote:

>>>If you don't know what is causing the problem, then you don't know what

>>>is not causing the problem.

>> Give me a break. I've looked at this problem from *all* angles,

>> and I have tried numerous things. There is a problem with Windows

>> Explorer... it is that simple.

>

>All Vista installs have Windows Explorer but not all Vista installs are

>having this problem. So apparently, it is not "that simple".

 

Frankie trying to play word games is like George Bush being invited to

be keynote speaker at some convention of English professors giving

lectures on proper grammar.

>> During 2006, I and others mentioned Explorer's miserable performance

>> many times. Shortly after RTM last November, when it was crystal clear

>> the problems had not been fixed, I mostly stopped complaining about it

>> and moved on... I started using a much better file manager.

>>

>> Windows Explorer's various performance problems are so widely

>> known, I can't believe you brush it aside like you do.

>

>"like I do"...I'm not brushing anything aside. That's not true.

 

Of course you do. How many times have you called me and others idiots

and offered up the same threadbare cure all remedy used by all MS

bigots you didn't do a clean install, if you do, like magic all

problems go away. That the only song you know how to hum. Just once be

honest.

> Your inability

>> to admit that Vista has some problems, really taints anything you

>> have to say.... almost to the point of irrelevancy.

>

>Now you're getting a bit ridiculous. We've worked very hard at

>customization and a few work arounds with Vista. Nothing is as good as

>you want it to be nor as bad as it seems. Vista is no exception.

 

Nothing is more ridiculous that crackpots like one saying "I don't

have that problem", therefore no problems exist in Vista. People have

heard a few hundred renditions of that tune just in the last few

months.

>Arrogance and ignorance are only a few letters apart.

>We're planning on building a high-end test mule in the near future. I'll

>see to it that Vista Ultimate is installed in a totally default

>manner...no customization, no work arounds. Hopefully this slow file

>transfer problem will rear it's ugly head and we can trouble shot it as

>a singular problem.

>Later.

>Frank

 

What a difference 24 hours can make. Yesterday Frankie was saying

problem with file transfers, what problem, I don't have any problems.

 

You crack us up Frankie. Ever consider auditioning for the Jerry

Springer show?

On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 12:52:23 -0400, Mike <no@where.man> wrote:

>In article <qioi935ktceoke4qtlfqcdvc9t5ndme01l@4ax.com>,

> Adam Albright <AA@ABC.net> wrote:

>

>> You only copied 22 files. Try again copying 3200 files or 30,000 files

>> that amount to roughly the same volume. You seem to have "tested" the

>> same dumb way the boys of Redmond Washington probably did.

>

>OK, I ran 2 tests. Copy 2,319 files totaling 6.1 GB. Vista took 15

>minutes and change. OS X took 13 minutes and change.

>

>I then copied 15,029 files totaling 7.26 GB. Vista took 20 minutes

>and change. OS X took 16 minutes and change.

>

>Once again, OS X was marginally faster.

 

You consider 4 minutes less which works out to roughly 25% better

marginally faster? Now you understand why I laugh at what you guys

say. You always so biased you even skew your own facts.

>Again, there is no inherent Vista problem. It is isolated and probably

>driver related.

 

You forgot to add in your experience. Others like oh, 900,000 that

have commented on this problem in countless newsgroups,forums and web

pages see different results. This again is what cracks me up with guys

like you.

 

This is basically how I view you: Problem, what problem, I don't know

what those people are talking about. Here's why:

 

http://www.stevemiller4lasvegas.com/SeeNoEvilMonkeys.JPG

In article <8flk93lj8io7j5m6iq2nakonadkvbbs7bm@4ax.com>,

Adam Albright <AA@ABC.net> wrote:

> On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 12:52:23 -0400, Mike <no@where.man> wrote:

>

> >In article <qioi935ktceoke4qtlfqcdvc9t5ndme01l@4ax.com>,

> > Adam Albright <AA@ABC.net> wrote:

> >

> >> You only copied 22 files. Try again copying 3200 files or 30,000 files

> >> that amount to roughly the same volume. You seem to have "tested" the

> >> same dumb way the boys of Redmond Washington probably did.

> >

> >OK, I ran 2 tests. Copy 2,319 files totaling 6.1 GB. Vista took 15

> >minutes and change. OS X took 13 minutes and change.

> >

> >I then copied 15,029 files totaling 7.26 GB. Vista took 20 minutes

> >and change. OS X took 16 minutes and change.

> >

> >Once again, OS X was marginally faster.

>

> You consider 4 minutes less which works out to roughly 25% better

> marginally faster? Now you understand why I laugh at what you guys

> say. You always so biased you even skew your own facts.

 

It *is* marginally faster. Vista is not the "seriously broken" tripe

you have been spouting here for the last 3 days. It didn't take "an

hour" as someone else claimed, and then went on to say that Linux did

the same copy in 12 minutes! If I saw that kind of huge difference

then I would agree that Vista is "seriously broken".

 

Sure it can be better, no doubt about that. But it's clear you have

an agenda here, and that is to barge into a Vista support group and make

all kinds of wild eyed, unsupportable claims.

 

I'm done with this thread. I've proven you are an MS hating nut case.

Feel free to have the last word - children usually do.

 

Mike

Adam Albright wrote:

> You forgot to add in your experience. Others like oh, 900,000 that

> have commented on this problem in countless newsgroups,forums and web

> pages see different results.

 

Well georgie genius boy...I guess you're just another one of those

900,000...hahah yeah right!...who have this problem and can't fix it.

 

 

 

This again is what cracks me up with guys

> like you.

 

Oh that's what cracks us all up about you. Can't even fix your own computer.

Brilliant!

>

> This is basically how I view you: Problem, what problem, I don't know

> what those people are talking about. Here's why:

 

This is basically how we all view you...a big mouth idiot who claims to

be a genius but can't fix his own computer.

Oh and one who likes to back pedal by posting stupid, infantile references.

Frank

Adam Albright wrote:

 

>>

>>Now you're getting a bit ridiculous. We've worked very hard at

>>customization and a few work arounds with Vista. Nothing is as good as

>>you want it to be nor as bad as it seems. Vista is no exception.

>

>

> Nothing is more ridiculous that crackpots like one saying "I don't

> have that problem", therefore no problems exist in Vista.

 

Are you fu*kin drunk again or what. Can you read? I'm beginning to

believe you've got some real personal problems. I recognize others (not

all) are having this problem.

You're one of them.

 

People have

> heard a few hundred renditions of that tune just in the last few

> months.

>

>

>>Arrogance and ignorance are only a few letters apart.

>>We're planning on building a high-end test mule in the near future. I'll

>>see to it that Vista Ultimate is installed in a totally default

>>manner...no customization, no work arounds. Hopefully this slow file

>>transfer problem will rear it's ugly head and we can trouble shot it as

>>a singular problem.

>>Later.

>>Frank

>

>

> What a difference 24 hours can make. Yesterday Frankie was saying

> problem with file transfers, what problem, I don't have any problems.

 

You obviously need to solve some very depressing and deep personal

problems.

I'd tackle those and forget your computer problems if were you.

>

> You crack us up Frankie. Ever consider auditioning for the Jerry

> Springer show?

>

You're favorite show huh? Do you see your friends and relatives on

there...hahah!

Yeah, you crack us all up.

Ever get tired of me booting your ignorant (I mean genius) arse all over

this ng?

I sure don't...lol!

Frank

On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 10:36:41 -0700, Frank <fb@nospamer.cmn> wrote:

>Adam Albright wrote:

>

>> You forgot to add in your experience. Others like oh, 900,000 that

>> have commented on this problem in countless newsgroups,forums and web

>> pages see different results.

>

>Well georgie genius boy...I guess you're just another one of those

>900,000...hahah yeah right!...who have this problem and can't fix it.

 

Don't you ever stop lying Frankie? I'm simply DOUCMENTING the problem.

The funny think is I'm the one that did offer a partial fix and posted

here in the newsgroup back in April then recently updated it by

modifying permissions. The only way you try to score points assuming

that is your purpose is by shooting off you mouth and continuing to

post the same lie over and over. People have noticed.

> This again is what cracks me up with guys

>> like you.

>

>Oh that's what cracks us all up about you. Can't even fix your own computer.

>Brilliant!

>>

>> This is basically how I view you: Problem, what problem, I don't know

>> what those people are talking about. Here's why:

>

>This is basically how we all view you...a big mouth idiot who claims to

>be a genius but can't fix his own computer.

>Oh and one who likes to back pedal by posting stupid, infantile references.

>Frank

 

You just hung yourself with your own words. Again. You do it all the

time Frankie.

Adam Albright wrote:

>

>

> Don't you ever stop lying Frankie? I'm simply DOUCMENTING the problem.

 

Oh yeah...sure...of course you are.

> The funny think is I'm the one that did offer a partial fix and posted

> here in the newsgroup back in April then recently updated it by

> modifying permissions. The only way you try to score points assuming

> that is your purpose is by shooting off you mouth and continuing to

> post the same lie over and over. People have noticed.

 

Noticed what? That you're a genius who can't fix his own computer?

Yep, they sure have noticed.

>

>

>> This again is what cracks me up with guys

>>

>>>like you.

>>

>>Oh that's what cracks us all up about you. Can't even fix your own computer.

>>Brilliant!

>>

>>>This is basically how I view you: Problem, what problem, I don't know

>>>what those people are talking about. Here's why:

>>

>>This is basically how we all view you...a big mouth idiot who claims to

>>be a genius but can't fix his own computer.

>>Oh and one who likes to back pedal by posting stupid, infantile references.

>>Frank

>

>

> You just hung yourself with your own words. Again. You do it all the

> time Frankie.

>

 

 

hehehe...I'm not the genius who can't fix his own computer?

Tired of me bootin your butt?

I'm not.

Frank

On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 10:52:12 -0700, Frank <fb@nospamer.cmn> wrote:

>Adam Albright wrote:

>

>

>>>

>>>Now you're getting a bit ridiculous. We've worked very hard at

>>>customization and a few work arounds with Vista. Nothing is as good as

>>>you want it to be nor as bad as it seems. Vista is no exception.

>>

>>

>> Nothing is more ridiculous that crackpots like one saying "I don't

>> have that problem", therefore no problems exist in Vista.

>

>Are you fu*kin drunk again or what. Can you read? I'm beginning to

>believe you've got some real personal problems. I recognize others (not

>all) are having this problem. You're one of them.

 

Still trying to play the you're a drunk card? That seems to be the

best you got. Pathetic fool that you are Frankie.

On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 11:30:56 -0700, Frank <fb@nospamer.cmn> wrote:

>Adam Albright wrote:

>>

>>

>> Don't you ever stop lying Frankie? I'm simply DOUCMENTING the problem.

>

>Oh yeah...sure...of course you are.

>

>> The funny think is I'm the one that did offer a partial fix and posted

>> here in the newsgroup back in April then recently updated it by

>> modifying permissions. The only way you try to score points assuming

>> that is your purpose is by shooting off you mouth and continuing to

>> post the same lie over and over. People have noticed.

>

>Noticed what? That you're a genius who can't fix his own computer?

>Yep, they sure have noticed.

 

I don't have to fix what isn't broken. You're such a klutz you keep

referring to the COMPUTER being broken you ignorant dunce. What's

obviously broken is Vista's file handling routine. Write it down so

you don't make a bigger ass of yourself next time you stick your foot

in your mouth. Vista is software, computers are hardware. See if you

can keep the two straight. Lots of luck, you'll need it since we all

known your mental capacity is somewhere between a stalk of celery and

a turnip.

Adam Albright wrote:

> On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 10:52:12 -0700, Frank <fb@nospamer.cmn> wrote:

>

>

>>Adam Albright wrote:

>>

>>

>>

>>>>Now you're getting a bit ridiculous. We've worked very hard at

>>>>customization and a few work arounds with Vista. Nothing is as good as

>>>>you want it to be nor as bad as it seems. Vista is no exception.

>>>

>>>

>>>Nothing is more ridiculous that crackpots like one saying "I don't

>>>have that problem", therefore no problems exist in Vista.

>>

>>Are you fu*kin drunk again or what. Can you read? I'm beginning to

>>believe you've got some real personal problems. I recognize others (not

>>all) are having this problem. You're one of them.

>

>

> Still trying to play the you're a drunk card? That seems to be the

> best you got. Pathetic fool that you are Frankie.

>

 

Still trying to play the"genius" card georgie-boy?

You're the pathetic fool!

Frank

Adam Albright wrote:

>

>

> I don't have to fix what isn't broken. You're such a klutz you keep

> referring to the COMPUTER being broken you ignorant dunce. What's

> obviously broken is Vista's file handling routine. Write it down so

> you don't make a bigger ass of yourself next time you stick your foot

> in your mouth. Vista is software, computers are hardware.

 

 

lol...You moron. Referring to a computer refers to all of it's

components you sniveling drunken jackass.

Try running a "computer" without software. A computer is comprised of

hardware and software.

You're really not a genius are you? You're just some fu*kin burnout

stupid arse loser.

Try making some kind of coherent sense the next time you reply to one of

my postings, ok?

Frank

On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 14:21:53 -0700, Frank <fb@nospamer.cmn> wrote:

>Adam Albright wrote:

>> On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 10:52:12 -0700, Frank <fb@nospamer.cmn> wrote:

>>

>>

>>>Adam Albright wrote:

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>>>Now you're getting a bit ridiculous. We've worked very hard at

>>>>>customization and a few work arounds with Vista. Nothing is as good as

>>>>>you want it to be nor as bad as it seems. Vista is no exception.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>Nothing is more ridiculous that crackpots like one saying "I don't

>>>>have that problem", therefore no problems exist in Vista.

>>>

>>>Are you fu*kin drunk again or what. Can you read? I'm beginning to

>>>believe you've got some real personal problems. I recognize others (not

>>>all) are having this problem. You're one of them.

>>

>>

>> Still trying to play the you're a drunk card? That seems to be the

>> best you got. Pathetic fool that you are Frankie.

>>

>

>Still trying to play the"genius" card georgie-boy?

>You're the pathetic fool!

>Frank

 

Well dummy I guess you could call me a genius since I haven't needed

to work for 20 years, having retired a little past 40. You keep

telling us you run a marketing company so if we take you at your word,

(funny) then you're still working, so who's the actual dope?

On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 14:27:52 -0700, Frank <fb@nospamer.cmn> wrote:

>Adam Albright wrote:

>> I don't have to fix what isn't broken. You're such a klutz you keep

>> referring to the COMPUTER being broken you ignorant dunce. What's

>> obviously broken is Vista's file handling routine. Write it down so

>> you don't make a bigger ass of yourself next time you stick your foot

>> in your mouth. Vista is software, computers are hardware.

>

>

>lol...You moron. Referring to a computer refers to all of it's

>components you sniveling drunken jackass.

 

You did it again Frankie. Software isn't a component. Software is

simply instructions that make the components in your computer do

something. In the case of Vista, an operating system, it provides

basic traffic control of what's going on. I'm using a very simple

explanation so nitwits like you have at least half a chance of

following along. -)

>Try making some kind of coherent sense the next time you reply to one of

>my postings, ok?

 

I make you dance and jump through hoops at will Bozo. I was thinking

of buying you a new leash. What is your neck size?

Adam Albright wrote:

> On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 14:21:53 -0700, Frank <fb@nospamer.cmn> wrote:

>

>

>>Adam Albright wrote:

>>

>>>On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 10:52:12 -0700, Frank <fb@nospamer.cmn> wrote:

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>>Adam Albright wrote:

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>>>Now you're getting a bit ridiculous. We've worked very hard at

>>>>>>customization and a few work arounds with Vista. Nothing is as good as

>>>>>>you want it to be nor as bad as it seems. Vista is no exception.

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>Nothing is more ridiculous that crackpots like one saying "I don't

>>>>>have that problem", therefore no problems exist in Vista.

>>>>

>>>>Are you fu*kin drunk again or what. Can you read? I'm beginning to

>>>>believe you've got some real personal problems. I recognize others (not

>>>>all) are having this problem. You're one of them.

>>>

>>>

>>>Still trying to play the you're a drunk card? That seems to be the

>>>best you got. Pathetic fool that you are Frankie.

>>>

>>

>>Still trying to play the"genius" card georgie-boy?

>>You're the pathetic fool!

>>Frank

>

>

> Well dummy I guess you could call me a genius since I haven't needed

> to work for 20 years, having retired a little past 40. You keep

> telling us you run a marketing company so if we take you at your word,

> (funny) then you're still working, so who's the actual dope?

>

 

Oh? So everyone who works is a "dope" in your opinion?

Hahaha...that a really ignorant statement coming from a supposed genius.

If it's any of your business, I've worked since I was 12 yrs old and

will work until I'm unable to.

I throughly enjoy my work as it keeps me sharp and involved. I don't

work for money (I don't need more money) I work to be successful in what

I'm doing and for the feeling it gives me of being worth while. I've

signed on the front of the check since I was 23. I am my own boss. My

life is very satisfying and fulfilling.

Many can relate to what I've just said.

Frank

Adam Albright wrote:

 

>

> You did it again Frankie. Software isn't a component. Software is

> simply instructions that make the components in your computer do

> something.

 

That's right dumb ass. They Software) and the hardware together comprise

what is popularly known as a "computer".

Is it that difficult for you to comprehend and understand?

 

In the case of Vista, an operating system, it provides

> basic traffic control of what's going on.

 

hehehe...yeah it the "component" that controls the

hardware...lol...you're an idiot!

 

 

I'm using a very simple

> explanation so nitwits like you have at least half a chance of

> following along. -)

 

Well bozo, next time try and get it right so a nitwit like you can even

understand it, ok?

Idiot.

>

>

>>Try making some kind of coherent sense the next time you reply to one of

>>my postings, ok?

>

>

> I make you dance and jump through hoops at will Bozo. I was thinking

> of buying you a new leash. What is your neck size?

 

I've got a better idea on how to spend your money.

Get some professional psychiatric help.

Oh, and one more thing...sober up for pete's sakes... you're keep making

a slobbering fool out of yourself in public.

You're becoming disgraceful!

Frank

On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 15:14:57 -0700, Frank <fb@nospamer.cmn> wrote:

>My life is very satisfying and fulfilling.

>Many can relate to what I've just said.

 

You spend a good part of your "life" bellyaching and trying to label

people that just happen to disagree with you as trolls, idiots or

drunks.

 

Nobody relates to you Frank because you nothing but a uncouth, always

whining crybaby and wannabe bully who's biggest skill is trying to

spread lies... like you accusing me of being some drunk. I very much

enjoy exposing you for the phony you actually are. :-)

On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 15:26:11 -0700, Frank <fb@nospamer.cmn> wrote:

>Adam Albright wrote:

>

>

>>

>> You did it again Frankie. Software isn't a component. Software is

>> simply instructions that make the components in your computer do

>> something.

>

>That's right dumb ass. They Software) and the hardware together comprise

>what is popularly known as a "computer".

>Is it that difficult for you to comprehend and understand?

 

Responding to the drivel somebody with the intelligence of a fourth

grader posts (you) isn't hard at all Frank.

>Oh, and one more thing...sober up for pete's sakes... you're keep making

>a slobbering fool out of yourself in public.

>You're becoming disgraceful!

>Frank

 

You seem to be becoming mad. Just more proof of the short fuse you

got. Now dance some more for us fool. You can stop when I tell you or

when you drop over. Whatever happens first.

Adam Albright wrote:

> On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 15:14:57 -0700, Frank <fb@nospamer.cmn> wrote:

>

>

>>My life is very satisfying and fulfilling.

>>Many can relate to what I've just said.

>

>

> You spend a good part of your "life" bellyaching and trying to label

> people that just happen to disagree with you as trolls, idiots or

> drunks.

>

> Nobody relates to you Frank because you nothing but a uncouth, always

> whining crybaby and wannabe bully who's biggest skill is trying to

> spread lies... like you accusing me of being some drunk. I very much

> enjoy exposing you for the phony you actually are. :-)

>

 

 

You know, I think I now understand why you said that your iq was 170.

You misunderstood the them (which is to be expected considering your

attitude) when they told you.

Actually, what they proly said was you're the one (1) with a 70 iq!

Which of course explains why I and everyone else need to explain

everything to you multiple times.

You're mentally only a 3 yr old!

Frank

On Jul 15, 12:31 pm, Mike <n...@where.man> wrote:

> In article <8flk93lj8io7j5m6iq2nakonadkvbbs...@4ax.com>,

> Adam Albright <A...@ABC.net> wrote:

>

>

>

> > On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 12:52:23 -0400, Mike <n...@where.man> wrote:

>

> > >In article <qioi935ktceoke4qtlfqcdvc9t5ndme...@4ax.com>,

> > > Adam Albright <A...@ABC.net> wrote:

>

> > >> You only copied 22 files. Try again copying 3200 files or 30,000 files

> > >> that amount to roughly the same volume. You seem to have "tested" the

> > >> same dumb way the boys of Redmond Washington probably did.

>

> > >OK, I ran 2 tests. Copy 2,319 files totaling 6.1 GB. Vista took 15

> > >minutes and change. OS X took 13 minutes and change.

>

> > >I then copied 15,029 files totaling 7.26 GB. Vista took 20 minutes

> > >and change. OS X took 16 minutes and change.

>

> > >Once again, OS X was marginally faster.

>

> > You consider 4 minutes less which works out to roughly 25% better

> > marginally faster? Now you understand why I laugh at what you guys

> > say. You always so biased you even skew your own facts.

>

> It *is* marginally faster. Vista is not the "seriously broken" tripe

> you have been spouting here for the last 3 days. It didn't take "an

> hour" as someone else claimed, and then went on to say that Linux did

> the same copy in 12 minutes! If I saw that kind of huge difference

> then I would agree that Vista is "seriously broken".

>

> Sure it can be better, no doubt about that. But it's clear you have

> an agenda here, and that is to barge into a Vista support group and make

> all kinds of wild eyed, unsupportable claims.

>

> I'm done with this thread. I've proven you are an MS hating nut case.

> Feel free to have the last word - children usually do.

>

> Mike

 

What no archiving Mikey? Gee too bad your post about "celebrating" the

death of a woman who died of breast cancer will NEVER go away.

Adam Albright wrote:

> On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 10:03:05 -0500, Charlie Tame <charlie@tames.net>

> wrote:

>

>> Alias wrote:

>>> Frank wrote:

>>> You have no business here unless you have a legitimate

>>>> install of Vista.

>>> 1. You're not the moderator.

>>>

>>> 2. What about people who are considering Vista?

>>>

>>> 3. What about people who can offer a viable alternative to the

>>> intrusive, DRM riddled public BETA called Vista?

>>>

>>> 4. You're not the moderator.

>>>

>>> Alias

>>

>> Hehe, are you trying to accuse Frank of "Moderation" ???

>

>

> Now THAT is funny!

>

> Considering Frankie is the most biased poster here. Remember Frankie

> is engaged in his own Jihad (holy war) to cleanse this newsgroup of

> anyone not showing undying allegiance to Microsoft. Need proof?

> Frankie's own words repeated:

>

> "You have no business here unless you have a legitimate

> install of Vista"

>

>

 

 

Hehe, well actually I like Vista and I like Microsoft products in

general, I think they have formed an industry standard that suits many

people and there's no doubt that the PC and MS together have brought

technology within reach of many who would not otherwise be able to

afford it. BUT when there are problems it is no use simply denying them

and neither is it any use saying a product is wonderful when it's full

of holes.

On Jul 14, 9:42 pm, Mike <n...@where.man> wrote:

> In article <u0caaYoxHHA.4...@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl>,

> Charlie Tame <char...@tames.net> wrote:

>

> > Both machines have wireless and / or LAN and removable drives so the

> > comparison is between identical hardware except the video cards which

> > are very similar but not quite the same, so when I compare the Windows

> > versions it should be a fair comparison. All versions are MSDN original

> > CD / DVD and not very old.

>

> > Vista <> Vista very slow

> > XP <> XP slow

> > Vista <> XP very slow

> > Debian Linux <> Debian Linux MUCH faster

> > Linux <> Windows may be a bit faster than either Windows <> Windows

>

> > Does this clarify the situation a bit?

>

> Yes. How many files are you copying? Dozens? Hundreds?

> Thousands? I ask because I copied a couple dozen files that totaled

> 3.75 GB and got nearly identical results in Vista and OS X.

>

> Mike

 

What no archiving Mikey? Gee too bad your post about "celebrating" the

death of a woman who died of breast cancer will NEVER go away.

Mike wrote:

> In article <qioi935ktceoke4qtlfqcdvc9t5ndme01l@4ax.com>,

> Adam Albright <AA@ABC.net> wrote:

>

>> You only copied 22 files. Try again copying 3200 files or 30,000 files

>> that amount to roughly the same volume. You seem to have "tested" the

>> same dumb way the boys of Redmond Washington probably did.

>

> OK, I ran 2 tests. Copy 2,319 files totaling 6.1 GB. Vista took 15

> minutes and change. OS X took 13 minutes and change.

>

> I then copied 15,029 files totaling 7.26 GB. Vista took 20 minutes

> and change. OS X took 16 minutes and change.

>

> Once again, OS X was marginally faster. Both varied on the "Time

> remaining" calculations, both going up and down during the copy. Vista

> always starts really high - like 30 minutes or so - but quickly adjusts

> to the (more or less) correct time. OS X starts out pretty accurate

> but does jump up and down as the copy progresses.

>

> Again, there is no inherent Vista problem. It is isolated and probably

> driver related.

>

> Mike

 

 

Hehe, maybe it's your machine that's malfunctioning and 900,000 working

properly...

 

Seriously though that is interesting. I must leave this PC running a

task for about another 24 hours after which I may be able to re-test the

issue on the same hardware. To be honest I almost always used synctoy or

a product called filesysnc because the explorer copy always seemed to

get into trouble so it's not something I can claim much experience with.

Charlie Tame wrote:

 

>

> Hehe, maybe it's your machine that's malfunctioning and 900,000 working

> properly...

>

 

hehehe...you don't actually think that 900,000 hits on google truly

represent 900,000 individuals having the slow file transfer problem do you?

 

> Seriously though that is interesting. I must leave this PC running a

> task for about another 24 hours after which I may be able to re-test the

> issue on the same hardware. To be honest I almost always used synctoy or

> a product called filesysnc because the explorer copy always seemed to

> get into trouble so it's not something I can claim much experience with.

 

Humm...interesting...cause all of our boxes are off line synced with

folders/files on our servers.

Frank

"Alias" <aka@maskedandanonymous.info> wrote in message

news:%23rPFpasxHHA.5068@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

> Lang Murphy wrote:

>> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanonymous.info> wrote in message

>> news:uqVRGCkxHHA.4436@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

>>> Frank wrote:

>>>

>>>> I too am Mensa,

>>>

>>> Hahahahahaha! Now *that's* funny!

>>>

>>> Alias

>>

>>

>> Jealous? Gee... not surprising.

>>

>> Lang

>

> Why should I be jealous of some boor like Frank who lies about his

> intelligence and who can only express himself with third grade clichés?

>

> Alias

 

 

Frank's not the only person in this ng that claims a high IQ. Many obviously

intelligent people in this ng seem to revert to 3rd grade attitudes when

heat is applied. I don't doubt Frank's claim to being a Mensa member. Too

bad you have to take a shot at Frank and others at every turn. You have

exhibited the 3rd grade attitude yourself, with regular frequency.

 

Lang

Lang Murphy wrote:

> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanonymous.info> wrote in message

> news:%23rPFpasxHHA.5068@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>> Lang Murphy wrote:

>>> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanonymous.info> wrote in message

>>> news:uqVRGCkxHHA.4436@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

>>>> Frank wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> I too am Mensa,

>>>>

>>>> Hahahahahaha! Now *that's* funny!

>>>>

>>>> Alias

>>>

>>>

>>> Jealous? Gee... not surprising.

>>>

>>> Lang

>>

>> Why should I be jealous of some boor like Frank who lies about his

>> intelligence and who can only express himself with third grade clichés?

>>

>> Alias

>

>

> Frank's not the only person in this ng that claims a high IQ.

 

Those who really have one, rarely claim it.

> Many

> obviously intelligent people in this ng seem to revert to 3rd grade

> attitudes when heat is applied. I don't doubt Frank's claim to being a

> Mensa member.

 

I most certainly do. He lies about everything else. Why do you think

he's telling the truth when bragging?

 

Too bad you have to take a shot at Frank and others at

> every turn. You have exhibited the 3rd grade attitude yourself, with

> regular frequency.

>

> Lang

 

Occasionally being lied about by the likes of Frank gets to me and I,

too, reveal that I am human and prone to making mistakes. But, unlike

Frank, I try not to stoop that low.

 

Alias