Tiberius on Vista da pathetic OS wrote:

> how is that vista shrine you are building coming along?

>

> Do you kneel for your vista god 3 times again as you promised it?

>

> After Frank you are the second most stupid person in this newsgroup..

>

 

No Cardboard Pilot...I am smart enough to master Vista, XP, ubuntu, and

any other OS you can steal from your mum.

 

And noooo...You and alexB got me beat...I am in fourth !

Tiberius on Vista da pathetic OS wrote:

> how is that vista shrine you are building coming along?

>

> Do you kneel for your vista god 3 times again as you promised it?

>

> After Frank you are the second most stupid person in this newsgroup..

>

> you cant beat frank ever, but you are a nice substitute for us smart non

> people to kick around

> when the king of fools is not around.

>

> "forty-nine" <110001@49.xyz> wrote in message news:fn5r2n$q5r$1@aioe.org...

>

>> Noozer wrote:

>>

>>>> lets hope for microsofts sake that windows 7 will be better..

>>>> because If it has anything to do with vista people will flock away

>>>> from the "collective".

>>>

>>>

>>> Just purchased a new Gateway laptop. The only OS choice was Windows

>>> Vista. I formatted it and installed XP right away but found that the

>>> backlight doesn't function with the Intel XP drivers.

>>>

>>> ...so now it's happily running Linux.

>>>

>>> Vista is horrible. I'd rather run Windows ME if I was forced to use

>>> Windows!!!

>>

>>

>> Too bad your not posting from Linux...doh !

>

>

hehehe...we're not the stupid fools who can't figure out how to make

Vista run properly...like you can't...now who's the foll...fool?

Hahaha...you're not all that bright are you dufus...LOL!

Frank

On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:09:57 -0500, "Mike Hall - MVP"

<mikehall@mvps.com> wrote:

>"Joe cann" <joe@beerget.com> wrote in message

>news:479650ff$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...

>> nice to see 2 brainwashed MS drones agreeing with eachother...

>>

>>

>> how pathetic...

>>

>>

>> XP outperforms vista on all new and older hardware.. PERIOD.. no excuses..

>> its just faster...

>>

>> the reason why Vista needs more is NOT because it has more features but

>> because its poorly desgined..

>>

>> MS knows this, thats why they are DRASTICALLY sliming down the windows 7

>> core...

>>

>>

>> Guys wake up.. you are the VICTIMS of Vista... brainwashed and made to

>> comply.

>>

>>

>>

>>

>> "Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote in message

>> news:ucgcp3duaoav3ajvi37kov5o72kdmcrtcp@4ax.com...

>>> On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:51:22 -0500, "Mike Hall - MVP"

>>> <mikehall@mvps.com> wrote:

>>>

>>>

>>>> So what exactly does the test prove? It proves that each Windows version

>>>> requires more capable hardware is all, hardware that is readily

>>>> available

>>>> and relatively cheap.

>>>

>>>

>>> Exactly! Each new version has more features than the one before, and

>>> doing more requires more and faster hardware.

>>>

>>> Fortunately for all of us, over the years the improvements in the

>>> operating system have been more than matched by improvements and lower

>>> prices in hardware. So what we get is a better operating system with

>>> more and better features for less money.

>>>

>>> It boggles my mind that people see fit to complain about this.

>>>

>>>

>>> --

>>> Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User

>>> Please Reply to the Newsgroup

>>

>>

>

>

>It does have more features. They are just not riveted to the outside is

>all..

>

>And Windows 2000 outperforms XP, but we all knew that anyway.

>

>Please tell us something new at least..

 

Something new? Well Vista is the first OS in the history of M$ that

will be sold on new PCs well beyond its 1st anniversary. There must

be a reason that major PC companies are demanding that they still be

allowed to sell XP and I'll give you a clue, it's not that XP is

great.

Microsoft thrives on badly educated ignorant folk who are incapable of

critical and free thinking.

 

Vista is the result of this. And you are its user.

 

 

"Frank" <fb@samm.zrr> wrote in message

news:%238gkOpUXIHA.4448@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

> Tiberius on Vista da pathetic OS wrote:

>> how is that vista shrine you are building coming along?

>>

>> Do you kneel for your vista god 3 times again as you promised it?

>>

>> After Frank you are the second most stupid person in this newsgroup..

>>

>> you cant beat frank ever, but you are a nice substitute for us smart non

>> people to kick around

>> when the king of fools is not around.

>>

>> "forty-nine" <110001@49.xyz> wrote in message

>> news:fn5r2n$q5r$1@aioe.org...

>>

>>> Noozer wrote:

>>>

>>>>> lets hope for microsofts sake that windows 7 will be better.. because

>>>>> If it has anything to do with vista people will flock away from the

>>>>> "collective".

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Just purchased a new Gateway laptop. The only OS choice was Windows

>>>> Vista. I formatted it and installed XP right away but found that the

>>>> backlight doesn't function with the Intel XP drivers.

>>>>

>>>> ...so now it's happily running Linux.

>>>>

>>>> Vista is horrible. I'd rather run Windows ME if I was forced to use

>>>> Windows!!!

>>>

>>>

>>> Too bad your not posting from Linux...doh !

>>

>>

> hehehe...we're not the stupid fools who can't figure out how to make Vista

> run properly...like you can't...now who's the foll...fool?

> Hahaha...you're not all that bright are you dufus...LOL!

> Frank

Microsoft thrives on badly educated ignorant folk who are incapable of

critical and free thinking.

 

Vista is the result of this. And you are its user.

 

 

"forty-nine" <110001@49.xyz> wrote in message news:fn5rlo$svb$1@aioe.org...

> Tiberius on Vista da pathetic OS wrote:

>> how is that vista shrine you are building coming along?

>>

>> Do you kneel for your vista god 3 times again as you promised it?

>>

>> After Frank you are the second most stupid person in this newsgroup..

>>

>

> No Cardboard Pilot...I am smart enough to master Vista, XP, ubuntu, and

> any other OS you can steal from your mum.

>

> And noooo...You and alexB got me beat...I am in fourth !

dont reflect your own shortcomings on to others BOZO!

 

 

"Frank" <fb@samm.zrr> wrote in message

news:usuSB7TXIHA.4684@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

> Joe cann wrote:

>> in real world scenariors vista performes far worse than these benchmarks

>> show

>>

>>

>> lol

>>

>>

>>

>> "dzomlija" <dzomlija.33lsm6@no-mx.forums.net> wrote in message

>> news:dzomlija.33lsm6@no-mx.forums.net...

>>

>>>- Bobb -581905 Wrote:

>>>

>>>>'Windows XP outshines Vista in benchmarking test | CNET News.com'

>>>>(http://msn-cnet.com.com/Windows-XP-outshines-Vista-in-benchmarking-test/2100-1016_3-6220201.html?tag=newsmap)

>>>>

>>>>.... Microsoft has had to allow PC manufacturers to continue to sell XP

>>>>on

>>>>new PCs, setting a deadline for the last sale at January 31. However,

>>>>the

>>>>pressure from manufacturers and consumers has been so great that

>>>>Microsoft

>>>>has been forced to extend the deadline another five months, until June.

>>>

>>>The results of any benchmark test are about as effective as sunblock is

>>>to a nuclear explosion - Utterly pointless!

>>>

>>>As just about anyone would tell you, benchmark programs are usually

>>>written with specific operating systems in mind. If the benchmarking

>>>program for XP is run on Vista, the results will be skewed, and cannot

>>>be taken as gospel. And comparing the scores of a XP Benchmark program

>>>with those of a Vista benchmark program is like comparing apples with

>>>oranges. They cannot be categorically compared.

>>>

>>>What truly determines the viability of any OS is it's real-world

>>>performance, not a synthetic benchmark, And in the past year in which

>>>I've been using Vista, my conclusion is this - Despite it's greater

>>>system requirements, my day-to-day productivity has improved. And that

>>>is where the difference is. I can work more efficiently than I ever

>>>could on XP.

>>>

>>>

>>>--

>>>dzomlija

>>>

>>>_____________________

>>>Peter Alexander Dzomlija

>>>-Do you hear, huh? The Alpha and The Omega? Death and Rebirth? And as

>>>you die, so shall I be Reborn...-

>>>

>>>-Download MP3 Media Properties Explorer: --http://www.phx.co.za-

>>>

>>>- ASUS A8N32-SLI-Deluxe

>>>- AMD Athlon 64 Dual-Core 4800+

>>>- 4GB DDR400

>>>- 128MB ASUS nVidia 6600

>>>- Thermaltake Tai-Chi Chassis

>>>- 1207GB Formatted Storage

>>>- Vista Ultimate x64

>>>- CodeGear Delphi 2007See my rig at:

>>>http://s229.photobucket.com/albums/ee312/Dzomlija/Venus/

>>

>>

>>

> hehehe...you don't live in a real world.

> Frank

How long after the snorting do you sit in front of the screen?

 

 

"David" <dgprozzoLEAVE@bellsouthOUT.net> wrote in message

news:%23Z%23c1qTXIHA.5448@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

> In whose real world scenarios?

>

> Once my completed the (rather short) learning curve, Vista is a delight.

>

> "Joe cann" <joe@beerget.com> wrote in message

> news:479651bf@newsgate.x-privat.org...

>> in real world scenariors vista performes far worse than these benchmarks

>> show

>>

>>

>> lol

>>

>>

>>

>> "dzomlija" <dzomlija.33lsm6@no-mx.forums.net> wrote in message

>> news:dzomlija.33lsm6@no-mx.forums.net...

>>>

>>> - Bobb -581905 Wrote:

>>>> 'Windows XP outshines Vista in benchmarking test | CNET News.com'

>>>> (http://msn-cnet.com.com/Windows-XP-outshines-Vista-in-benchmarking-test/2100-1016_3-6220201.html?tag=newsmap)

>>>>

>>>> .... Microsoft has had to allow PC manufacturers to continue to sell XP

>>>> on

>>>> new PCs, setting a deadline for the last sale at January 31. However,

>>>> the

>>>> pressure from manufacturers and consumers has been so great that

>>>> Microsoft

>>>> has been forced to extend the deadline another five months, until June.

>>>

>>> The results of any benchmark test are about as effective as sunblock is

>>> to a nuclear explosion - Utterly pointless!

>>>

>>> As just about anyone would tell you, benchmark programs are usually

>>> written with specific operating systems in mind. If the benchmarking

>>> program for XP is run on Vista, the results will be skewed, and cannot

>>> be taken as gospel. And comparing the scores of a XP Benchmark program

>>> with those of a Vista benchmark program is like comparing apples with

>>> oranges. They cannot be categorically compared.

>>>

>>> What truly determines the viability of any OS is it's real-world

>>> performance, not a synthetic benchmark, And in the past year in which

>>> I've been using Vista, my conclusion is this - Despite it's greater

>>> system requirements, my day-to-day productivity has improved. And that

>>> is where the difference is. I can work more efficiently than I ever

>>> could on XP.

>>>

>>>

>>> --

>>> dzomlija

>>>

>>> _____________________

>>> Peter Alexander Dzomlija

>>> -Do you hear, huh? The Alpha and The Omega? Death and Rebirth? And as

>>> you die, so shall I be Reborn...-

>>>

>>> -Download MP3 Media Properties Explorer: --http://www.phx.co.za-

>>>

>>> - ASUS A8N32-SLI-Deluxe

>>> - AMD Athlon 64 Dual-Core 4800+

>>> - 4GB DDR400

>>> - 128MB ASUS nVidia 6600

>>> - Thermaltake Tai-Chi Chassis

>>> - 1207GB Formatted Storage

>>> - Vista Ultimate x64

>>> - CodeGear Delphi 2007See my rig at:

>>> http://s229.photobucket.com/albums/ee312/Dzomlija/Venus/

>>

>>

In all the new articles vienna is now refered to as Windows 7

 

you should read more.. the internet is full of people that absolutly hate

Vista, and are hoping that

windows 7 will be extreamly better.

 

I think MS knows that they cant withstand another flop so they are working

their arses off now to make a good OS.

 

"Jane C" <janecolman@invalid.iinet.net.au> wrote in message

news:%23j3n6KUXIHA.4868@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

>

>

> "The poster formerly known as 'The Poster Formerly Known as Nina DiBoy'"

> <none@none.not> wrote in message news:fn5o97$hdl$1@aioe.org...

>> I thought it was Vienna.

>>

>

> Blackcomb was the original codename, which later got changed to Vienna

> AFAICR.

>

>

> --

> Jane, not plain ) 64 bit enabled :-)

> Batteries not included. Braincell on vacation -)

> MVP Windows Shell/User

"Joe cann" <joe@beerget.com> wrote in message

news:47968638$2@newsgate.x-privat.org...

> Microsoft thrives on badly educated ignorant folk who are incapable of

> critical and free thinking.

>

> Vista is the result of this. And you are its user.

>

>

 

Hahaha...yeah, I'm the idiot.

You do know that OE6 is a MS product, right ?

In case you don't realize...its what your posting from...dingus.

>>And Windows 2000 outperforms XP, but we all knew that anyway.

 

Not always. XP outperforms 2000 when it comes to playing games.

>>Please tell us something new at least..

 

How about the fact the Vista does *NOTHING* better than XP.

"Joe cann" <joe@beerget.com> wrote in message

news:47968638@newsgate.x-privat.org...

> Microsoft thrives on badly educated ignorant folk who are incapable of

> critical and free thinking.

>

> Vista is the result of this. And you are its user.

>

>

> "Frank" <fb@samm.zrr> wrote in message

> news:%238gkOpUXIHA.4448@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

>> Tiberius on Vista da pathetic OS wrote:

>>> how is that vista shrine you are building coming along?

>>>

>>> Do you kneel for your vista god 3 times again as you promised it?

>>>

>>> After Frank you are the second most stupid person in this newsgroup..

>>>

>>> you cant beat frank ever, but you are a nice substitute for us smart non

>>> people to kick around

>>> when the king of fools is not around.

>>>

>>> "forty-nine" <110001@49.xyz> wrote in message

>>> news:fn5r2n$q5r$1@aioe.org...

>>>

>>>> Noozer wrote:

>>>>

>>>>>> lets hope for microsofts sake that windows 7 will be better.. because

>>>>>> If it has anything to do with vista people will flock away from the

>>>>>> "collective".

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Just purchased a new Gateway laptop. The only OS choice was Windows

>>>>> Vista. I formatted it and installed XP right away but found that the

>>>>> backlight doesn't function with the Intel XP drivers.

>>>>>

>>>>> ...so now it's happily running Linux.

>>>>>

>>>>> Vista is horrible. I'd rather run Windows ME if I was forced to use

>>>>> Windows!!!

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Too bad your not posting from Linux...doh !

 

Well... considering that the laptop is about 800 miles away right now, it

would be rather difficult to post from.

>> hehehe...we're not the stupid fools who can't figure out how to make

>> Vista run properly...like you can't...now who's the foll...fool?

>> Hahaha...you're not all that bright are you dufus...LOL!

>> Frank

 

Hrm.. let's see... Add an extra gig of memory. Buy a new video card. Install

a bigger hard drive. Just so I can install Vista and hack it down to

operating like my current XP installation?

 

NOW who's the fool?

"forty-nine" <110001@49.xyz> wrote in message news:fn61d9$erf$1@aioe.org...

> "Joe cann" <joe@beerget.com> wrote in message

> news:47968638$2@newsgate.x-privat.org...

>> Microsoft thrives on badly educated ignorant folk who are incapable of

>> critical and free thinking.

>>

>> Vista is the result of this. And you are its user.

> Hahaha...yeah, I'm the idiot.

> You do know that OE6 is a MS product, right ?

> In case you don't realize...its what your posting from...dingus.

 

And OE6 works perfectly fine in Windows XP. What's wrong with that?

 

Anyone who thinks that Vista is an improvement over XP *HAS* been

brainwashed by Microsoft.

forty-nine wrote:

> "Joe cann" <joe@beerget.com> wrote in message

> news:47968638$2@newsgate.x-privat.org...

>> Microsoft thrives on badly educated ignorant folk who are incapable of

>> critical and free thinking.

>>

>> Vista is the result of this. And you are its user.

>>

>>

>

> Hahaha...yeah, I'm the idiot.

> You do know that OE6 is a MS product, right ?

> In case you don't realize...its what your posting from...dingus.

 

Don't forget to compact your messages and don't ever let a .dbx file get

larger than 200 MB. Giggle. You should at least use a newsreader that

still has support like Thunderbird.

 

Alias

Frank wrote:

> Tiberius on Vista da pathetic OS wrote:

>> how is that vista shrine you are building coming along?

>>

>> Do you kneel for your vista god 3 times again as you promised it?

>>

>> After Frank you are the second most stupid person in this newsgroup..

>>

>> you cant beat frank ever, but you are a nice substitute for us smart

>> non people to kick around

>> when the king of fools is not around.

>>

>> "forty-nine" <110001@49.xyz> wrote in message

>> news:fn5r2n$q5r$1@aioe.org...

>>

>>> Noozer wrote:

>>>

>>>>> lets hope for microsofts sake that windows 7 will be better..

>>>>> because If it has anything to do with vista people will flock away

>>>>> from the "collective".

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Just purchased a new Gateway laptop. The only OS choice was Windows

>>>> Vista. I formatted it and installed XP right away but found that the

>>>> backlight doesn't function with the Intel XP drivers.

>>>>

>>>> ...so now it's happily running Linux.

>>>>

>>>> Vista is horrible. I'd rather run Windows ME if I was forced to use

>>>> Windows!!!

>>>

>>>

>>> Too bad your not posting from Linux...doh !

>>

>>

> hehehe...we're not the stupid fools who can't figure out how to make

> Vista run properly...like you can't...now who's the foll...fool?

> Hahaha...you're not all that bright are you dufus...LOL!

> Frank

 

The post you are replying to was composed with Windows Mail. I believe

that Windows Mail only comes with the Vista Virus, yes?

 

Alias

Noozer wrote:

> "Joe cann" <joe@beerget.com> wrote in message

> news:47968638@newsgate.x-privat.org...

>

>>Microsoft thrives on badly educated ignorant folk who are incapable of

>>critical and free thinking.

>>

>>Vista is the result of this. And you are its user.

>>

>>

>>"Frank" <fb@samm.zrr> wrote in message

>>news:%238gkOpUXIHA.4448@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

>>

>>>Tiberius on Vista da pathetic OS wrote:

>>>

>>>>how is that vista shrine you are building coming along?

>>>>

>>>>Do you kneel for your vista god 3 times again as you promised it?

>>>>

>>>>After Frank you are the second most stupid person in this newsgroup..

>>>>

>>>>you cant beat frank ever, but you are a nice substitute for us smart non

>>>>people to kick around

>>>>when the king of fools is not around.

>>>>

>>>>"forty-nine" <110001@49.xyz> wrote in message

>>>>news:fn5r2n$q5r$1@aioe.org...

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>>Noozer wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>>>lets hope for microsofts sake that windows 7 will be better.. because

>>>>>>>If it has anything to do with vista people will flock away from the

>>>>>>>"collective".

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>Just purchased a new Gateway laptop. The only OS choice was Windows

>>>>>>Vista. I formatted it and installed XP right away but found that the

>>>>>>backlight doesn't function with the Intel XP drivers.

>>>>>>

>>>>>>...so now it's happily running Linux.

>>>>>>

>>>>>>Vista is horrible. I'd rather run Windows ME if I was forced to use

>>>>>>Windows!!!

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>Too bad your not posting from Linux...doh !

>

>

> Well... considering that the laptop is about 800 miles away right now, it

> would be rather difficult to post from.

>

>

>>>hehehe...we're not the stupid fools who can't figure out how to make

>>>Vista run properly...like you can't...now who's the foll...fool?

>>>Hahaha...you're not all that bright are you dufus...LOL!

>>>Frank

>

>

> Hrm.. let's see... Add an extra gig of memory. Buy a new video card. Install

> a bigger hard drive. Just so I can install Vista and hack it down to

> operating like my current XP installation?

>

> NOW who's the fool?

>

>

Is that what you think...or did...fool!

Frank

Joe cann wrote:

> In all the new articles vienna is now refered to as Windows 7

>

> you should read more.. the internet is full of people that absolutly hate

> Vista, and are hoping that

> windows 7 will be extreamly better.

>

> I think MS knows that they cant withstand another flop so they are working

> their arses off now to make a good OS.

>

> "Jane C" <janecolman@invalid.iinet.net.au> wrote in message

> news:%23j3n6KUXIHA.4868@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

>

>>

>>"The poster formerly known as 'The Poster Formerly Known as Nina DiBoy'"

>><none@none.not> wrote in message news:fn5o97$hdl$1@aioe.org...

>>

>>>I thought it was Vienna.

>>>

>>

>>Blackcomb was the original codename, which later got changed to Vienna

>>AFAICR.

>>

>>

>>--

>>Jane, not plain ) 64 bit enabled :-)

>>Batteries not included. Braincell on vacation -)

>>MVP Windows Shell/User

>

>

>

You're rather stupid aren't you.

Frank

Joe cann wrote:

> dont reflect your own shortcomings on to others BOZO!

 

He does it constantly and is too dumb to realize what he's doing.

 

Alias

>

>

> "Frank" <fb@samm.zrr> wrote in message

> news:usuSB7TXIHA.4684@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>> Joe cann wrote:

>>> in real world scenariors vista performes far worse than these benchmarks

>>> show

>>>

>>>

>>> lol

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>> "dzomlija" <dzomlija.33lsm6@no-mx.forums.net> wrote in message

>>> news:dzomlija.33lsm6@no-mx.forums.net...

>>>

>>>> - Bobb -581905 Wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> 'Windows XP outshines Vista in benchmarking test | CNET News.com'

>>>>> (http://msn-cnet.com.com/Windows-XP-outshines-Vista-in-benchmarking-test/2100-1016_3-6220201.html?tag=newsmap)

>>>>>

>>>>> .... Microsoft has had to allow PC manufacturers to continue to sell XP

>>>>> on

>>>>> new PCs, setting a deadline for the last sale at January 31. However,

>>>>> the

>>>>> pressure from manufacturers and consumers has been so great that

>>>>> Microsoft

>>>>> has been forced to extend the deadline another five months, until June.

>>>> The results of any benchmark test are about as effective as sunblock is

>>>> to a nuclear explosion - Utterly pointless!

>>>>

>>>> As just about anyone would tell you, benchmark programs are usually

>>>> written with specific operating systems in mind. If the benchmarking

>>>> program for XP is run on Vista, the results will be skewed, and cannot

>>>> be taken as gospel. And comparing the scores of a XP Benchmark program

>>>> with those of a Vista benchmark program is like comparing apples with

>>>> oranges. They cannot be categorically compared.

>>>>

>>>> What truly determines the viability of any OS is it's real-world

>>>> performance, not a synthetic benchmark, And in the past year in which

>>>> I've been using Vista, my conclusion is this - Despite it's greater

>>>> system requirements, my day-to-day productivity has improved. And that

>>>> is where the difference is. I can work more efficiently than I ever

>>>> could on XP.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> --

>>>> dzomlija

>>>>

>>>> _____________________

>>>> Peter Alexander Dzomlija

>>>> -Do you hear, huh? The Alpha and The Omega? Death and Rebirth? And as

>>>> you die, so shall I be Reborn...-

>>>>

>>>> -Download MP3 Media Properties Explorer: --http://www.phx.co.za-

>>>>

>>>> - ASUS A8N32-SLI-Deluxe

>>>> - AMD Athlon 64 Dual-Core 4800+

>>>> - 4GB DDR400

>>>> - 128MB ASUS nVidia 6600

>>>> - Thermaltake Tai-Chi Chassis

>>>> - 1207GB Formatted Storage

>>>> - Vista Ultimate x64

>>>> - CodeGear Delphi 2007See my rig at:

>>>> http://s229.photobucket.com/albums/ee312/Dzomlija/Venus/

>>>

>>>

>> hehehe...you don't live in a real world.

>> Frank

>

>

Alias wrote:

> forty-nine wrote:

>> "Joe cann" <joe@beerget.com> wrote in message

>> news:47968638$2@newsgate.x-privat.org...

>>> Microsoft thrives on badly educated ignorant folk who are incapable

>>> of critical and free thinking.

>>>

>>> Vista is the result of this. And you are its user.

>>>

>>>

>>

>> Hahaha...yeah, I'm the idiot.

>> You do know that OE6 is a MS product, right ?

>> In case you don't realize...its what your posting from...dingus.

>

> Don't forget to compact your messages and don't ever let a .dbx file get

> larger than 200 MB. Giggle. You should at least use a newsreader that

> still has support like Thunderbird.

>

> Alias

 

Don't type giggle...its creepy.

 

Vista compacts them for me !

Thanks Vista !

Noozer wrote:

>>>And Windows 2000 outperforms XP, but we all knew that anyway.

>

>

> Not always. XP outperforms 2000 when it comes to playing games.

>

>

>>>Please tell us something new at least..

>

>

> How about the fact the Vista does *NOTHING* better than XP.

>

>

You're pretty fukkin stupid aren't you.

Loser.

Frank

"Frank" <fb@samm.zrr> wrote in message

news:O7QdJpVXIHA.5180@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

> Noozer wrote:

>

>> "Joe cann" <joe@beerget.com> wrote in message

>> news:47968638@newsgate.x-privat.org...

>>

>>>Microsoft thrives on badly educated ignorant folk who are incapable of

>>>critical and free thinking.

>>>

>>>Vista is the result of this. And you are its user.

>>>

>>>

>>>"Frank" <fb@samm.zrr> wrote in message

>>>news:%238gkOpUXIHA.4448@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

>>>

>>>>Tiberius on Vista da pathetic OS wrote:

>>>>

>>>>>how is that vista shrine you are building coming along?

>>>>>

>>>>>Do you kneel for your vista god 3 times again as you promised it?

>>>>>

>>>>>After Frank you are the second most stupid person in this newsgroup..

>>>>>

>>>>>you cant beat frank ever, but you are a nice substitute for us smart

>>>>>non people to kick around

>>>>>when the king of fools is not around.

>>>>>

>>>>>"forty-nine" <110001@49.xyz> wrote in message

>>>>>news:fn5r2n$q5r$1@aioe.org...

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>>Noozer wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>lets hope for microsofts sake that windows 7 will be better..

>>>>>>>>because If it has anything to do with vista people will flock away

>>>>>>>>from the "collective".

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>Just purchased a new Gateway laptop. The only OS choice was Windows

>>>>>>>Vista. I formatted it and installed XP right away but found that the

>>>>>>>backlight doesn't function with the Intel XP drivers.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>...so now it's happily running Linux.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>Vista is horrible. I'd rather run Windows ME if I was forced to use

>>>>>>>Windows!!!

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>Too bad your not posting from Linux...doh !

>>

>>

>> Well... considering that the laptop is about 800 miles away right now, it

>> would be rather difficult to post from.

>>

>>

>>>>hehehe...we're not the stupid fools who can't figure out how to make

>>>>Vista run properly...like you can't...now who's the foll...fool?

>>>>Hahaha...you're not all that bright are you dufus...LOL!

>>>>Frank

>>

>>

>> Hrm.. let's see... Add an extra gig of memory. Buy a new video card.

>> Install a bigger hard drive. Just so I can install Vista and hack it

>> down to operating like my current XP installation?

>>

>> NOW who's the fool?

> Is that what you think...or did...fool!

 

Uhm. No. I stuck with a proven XP installation.

Seat of the pants feel on dual boot XP Pro/Vista Ultimate system.

Core 2 Duo 1.83Ghz, 2GB (dual channel enabled&functioning)/512MB PCI-e

Video/250GB SATA for Vista, 150GB EIDE for XP.

I disable special effects and indexing in both and use classic menus.

XP Wins hands down in everyday use. I don't need a benchmark to tell me when

I am waiting too long.

--

A Professional Amateur...If anyone knew it all, none of would be here!

CarGodZeroOne@hotmail.com

Change Alpha to Numeric to reply

 

"dzomlija" <dzomlija.33lsm6@no-mx.forums.net> wrote in message

news:dzomlija.33lsm6@no-mx.forums.net...

> - Bobb -581905 Wrote:

>> 'Windows XP outshines Vista in benchmarking test | CNET News.com'

>> (http://msn-cnet.com.com/Windows-XP-outshines-Vista-in-benchmarking-test/2100-1016_3-6220201.html?tag=newsmap)

>>

>> .... Microsoft has had to allow PC manufacturers to continue to sell XP

>> on

>> new PCs, setting a deadline for the last sale at January 31. However, the

>> pressure from manufacturers and consumers has been so great that

>> Microsoft

>> has been forced to extend the deadline another five months, until June.

> The results of any benchmark test are about as effective as sunblock is

> to a nuclear explosion - Utterly pointless!

> As just about anyone would tell you, benchmark programs are usually

> written with specific operating systems in mind. If the benchmarking

> program for XP is run on Vista, the results will be skewed, and cannot

> be taken as gospel. And comparing the scores of a XP Benchmark program

> with those of a Vista benchmark program is like comparing apples with

> oranges. They cannot be categorically compared.

>

> What truly determines the viability of any OS is it's real-world

> performance, not a synthetic benchmark, And in the past year in which

> I've been using Vista, my conclusion is this - Despite it's greater

> system requirements, my day-to-day productivity has improved. And that

> is where the difference is. I can work more efficiently than I ever

> could on XP.

>

>

> --

> dzomlija

>

> _____________________

> Peter Alexander Dzomlija

> -Do you hear, huh? The Alpha and The Omega? Death and Rebirth? And as

> you die, so shall I be Reborn...-

>

> -Download MP3 Media Properties Explorer: --http://www.phx.co.za-

>

> - ASUS A8N32-SLI-Deluxe

> - AMD Athlon 64 Dual-Core 4800+

> - 4GB DDR400

> - 128MB ASUS nVidia 6600

> - Thermaltake Tai-Chi Chassis

> - 1207GB Formatted Storage

> - Vista Ultimate x64

> - CodeGear Delphi 2007See my rig at:

> http://s229.photobucket.com/albums/ee312/Dzomlija/Venus/

"Frank" <fb@samm.zrr> wrote in message

news:eCh3IsVXIHA.4448@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

> Noozer wrote:

>

>>>>And Windows 2000 outperforms XP, but we all knew that anyway.

>>

>>

>> Not always. XP outperforms 2000 when it comes to playing games.

>>

>>

>>>>Please tell us something new at least..

>>

>>

>> How about the fact the Vista does *NOTHING* better than XP.

> You're pretty fukkin stupid aren't you.

> Loser.

> Frank

 

It's a sign of instablility to talk to yourself.

>

> Hrm.. let's see... Add an extra gig of memory. Buy a new video card. Install

> a bigger hard drive. Just so I can install Vista and hack it down to

> operating like my current XP installation?

>

> NOW who's the fool?

>

>

 

You are jokin' , right ?

If you can't get Vista to run fast...you couldn't hack anything.

Do you know how to install RAM ?

Noozer wrote:

> "Frank" <fb@samm.zrr> wrote in message

> news:O7QdJpVXIHA.5180@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>

>>Noozer wrote:

>>

>>

>>>"Joe cann" <joe@beerget.com> wrote in message

>>>news:47968638@newsgate.x-privat.org...

>>>

>>>

>>>>Microsoft thrives on badly educated ignorant folk who are incapable of

>>>>critical and free thinking.

>>>>

>>>>Vista is the result of this. And you are its user.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>"Frank" <fb@samm.zrr> wrote in message

>>>>news:%238gkOpUXIHA.4448@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>>Tiberius on Vista da pathetic OS wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>>how is that vista shrine you are building coming along?

>>>>>>

>>>>>>Do you kneel for your vista god 3 times again as you promised it?

>>>>>>

>>>>>>After Frank you are the second most stupid person in this newsgroup..

>>>>>>

>>>>>>you cant beat frank ever, but you are a nice substitute for us smart

>>>>>>non people to kick around

>>>>>>when the king of fools is not around.

>>>>>>

>>>>>>"forty-nine" <110001@49.xyz> wrote in message

>>>>>>news:fn5r2n$q5r$1@aioe.org...

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>>Noozer wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>lets hope for microsofts sake that windows 7 will be better..

>>>>>>>>>because If it has anything to do with vista people will flock away

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>from the "collective".

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>Just purchased a new Gateway laptop. The only OS choice was Windows

>>>>>>>>Vista. I formatted it and installed XP right away but found that the

>>>>>>>>backlight doesn't function with the Intel XP drivers.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>...so now it's happily running Linux.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>Vista is horrible. I'd rather run Windows ME if I was forced to use

>>>>>>>>Windows!!!

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>Too bad your not posting from Linux...doh !

>>>

>>>

>>>Well... considering that the laptop is about 800 miles away right now, it

>>>would be rather difficult to post from.

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>>>hehehe...we're not the stupid fools who can't figure out how to make

>>>>>Vista run properly...like you can't...now who's the foll...fool?

>>>>>Hahaha...you're not all that bright are you dufus...LOL!

>>>>>Frank

>>>

>>>

>>>Hrm.. let's see... Add an extra gig of memory. Buy a new video card.

>>>Install a bigger hard drive. Just so I can install Vista and hack it

>>>down to operating like my current XP installation?

>>>

>>>NOW who's the fool?

>>

>>Is that what you think...or did...fool!

>

>

> Uhm. No. I stuck with a proven XP installation.

>

>

Then why are you here?

Frank

Noozer wrote:

> "Frank" <fb@samm.zrr> wrote in message

> news:eCh3IsVXIHA.4448@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

>

>>Noozer wrote:

>>

>>

>>>>>And Windows 2000 outperforms XP, but we all knew that anyway.

>>>

>>>

>>>Not always. XP outperforms 2000 when it comes to playing games.

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>>>Please tell us something new at least..

>>>

>>>

>>>How about the fact the Vista does *NOTHING* better than XP.

>>

>>You're pretty fukkin stupid aren't you.

>>Loser.

>>Frank

>

>

> It's a sign of instablility to talk to yourself.

>

>

Then I suggest you STFU...LOL!

You're a real fukkin idiot...hahaha!

Frank