http://msn-cnet.com.com/Windows-XP-outshines-Vista-in-benchmarking-test/2100-1016_3-6220201.html?tag=newsmap

 

.... Microsoft has had to allow PC manufacturers to continue to sell XP on

new PCs, setting a deadline for the last sale at January 31. However, the

pressure from manufacturers and consumers has been so great that Microsoft

has been forced to extend the deadline another five months, until June.

- Bobb - wrote:

> http://msn-cnet.com.com/Windows-XP-outshines-Vista-in-benchmarking-test/2100-1016_3-6220201.html?tag=newsmap

>

>

> ... Microsoft has had to allow PC manufacturers to continue to sell XP

> on new PCs, setting a deadline for the last sale at January 31. However,

> the pressure from manufacturers and consumers has been so great that

> Microsoft has been forced to extend the deadline another five months,

> until June.

>

 

And with Ubuntu being downloaded at the rate of a million downloads a

month, expect XP to be extended even further and expect an SP4.

 

Alias

"- Bobb -" <bobb@noemail.123> wrote in message

news:%23phz3PSXIHA.5340@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

> http://msn-cnet.com.com/Windows-XP-outshines-Vista-in-benchmarking-test/2100-1016_3-6220201.html?tag=newsmap

>

> ... Microsoft has had to allow PC manufacturers to continue to sell XP on

> new PCs, setting a deadline for the last sale at January 31. However, the

> pressure from manufacturers and consumers has been so great that Microsoft

> has been forced to extend the deadline another five months, until June.

>

 

 

The test was run on a notebook with 1gb of RAM, underspecified for Vista and

way beyond the spec for which XP was first developed. If my memory serves me

correctly, the tests were deliberately tilted at making XP look better even

in SP2 guise..

 

No doubt if Win 2000 drivers were available for the machine, it would run

twice as fast as XP. Equally, if XP SP2 or 3 was run on a base level Win

2000 machine, XP would and did run like a dog.

 

So what exactly does the test prove? It proves that each Windows version

requires more capable hardware is all, hardware that is readily available

and relatively cheap.

 

 

 

--

Mike Hall - MVP

http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx

Alias wrote:

>>

>

> And with Ubuntu being downloaded at the rate of a million downloads a

> month,

 

 

OMG!!!....more of your incessant and insidious lies?

Get some help you pathetic POS lying linux troll!

Frank

Frank wrote:

> Alias wrote:

>

>>>

>>

>> And with Ubuntu being downloaded at the rate of a million downloads a

>> month,

>

>

> OMG!!!....more of your incessant and insidious lies?

> Get some help you pathetic POS lying linux troll!

> Frank

 

A million a month scares you? Makes you jealous? Yep, and it makes you

lie, insult, use profanity and bluster.

 

Alias

Alias wrote:

> Frank wrote:

>

>> Alias wrote:

>>

>>>>

>>>

>>> And with Ubuntu being downloaded at the rate of a million downloads a

>>> month,

>>

>>

>>

>> OMG!!!....more of your incessant and insidious lies?

>> Get some help you pathetic POS lying linux troll!

>> Frank

>

>

> A million a month scares you?

 

hehehe why...it's your "fantasy'...not mine.

 

Makes you jealous?

 

Of what? That POS toy os? You're one delusional pathological liar.

Frank

On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:51:22 -0500, "Mike Hall - MVP"

<mikehall@mvps.com> wrote:

 

> So what exactly does the test prove? It proves that each Windows version

> requires more capable hardware is all, hardware that is readily available

> and relatively cheap.

 

 

Exactly! Each new version has more features than the one before, and

doing more requires more and faster hardware.

 

Fortunately for all of us, over the years the improvements in the

operating system have been more than matched by improvements and lower

prices in hardware. So what we get is a better operating system with

more and better features for less money.

 

It boggles my mind that people see fit to complain about this.

 

 

--

Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User

Please Reply to the Newsgroup

- Bobb -581905 Wrote:

> 'Windows XP outshines Vista in benchmarking test | CNET News.com'

> (http://msn-cnet.com.com/Windows-XP-outshines-Vista-in-benchmarking-test/2100-1016_3-6220201.html?tag=newsmap)

>

> .... Microsoft has had to allow PC manufacturers to continue to sell XP

> on

> new PCs, setting a deadline for the last sale at January 31. However,

> the

> pressure from manufacturers and consumers has been so great that

> Microsoft

> has been forced to extend the deadline another five months, until June.

 

The results of any benchmark test are about as effective as sunblock is

to a nuclear explosion - Utterly pointless!

 

As just about anyone would tell you, benchmark programs are usually

written with specific operating systems in mind. If the benchmarking

program for XP is run on Vista, the results will be skewed, and cannot

be taken as gospel. And comparing the scores of a XP Benchmark program

with those of a Vista benchmark program is like comparing apples with

oranges. They cannot be categorically compared.

 

What truly determines the viability of any OS is it's real-world

performance, not a synthetic benchmark, And in the past year in which

I've been using Vista, my conclusion is this - Despite it's greater

system requirements, my day-to-day productivity has improved. And that

is where the difference is. I can work more efficiently than I ever

could on XP.

 

 

--

dzomlija

 

_____________________

Peter Alexander Dzomlija

-Do you hear, huh? The Alpha and The Omega? Death and Rebirth? And as

you die, so shall I be Reborn...-

 

-Download MP3 Media Properties Explorer: --http://www.phx.co.za-

 

- ASUS A8N32-SLI-Deluxe

- AMD Athlon 64 Dual-Core 4800+

- 4GB DDR400

- 128MB ASUS nVidia 6600

- Thermaltake Tai-Chi Chassis

- 1207GB Formatted Storage

- Vista Ultimate x64

- CodeGear Delphi 2007See my rig at: http://s229.photobucket.com/albums/ee312/Dzomlija/Venus/

nice to see 2 brainwashed MS drones agreeing with eachother...

 

 

how pathetic...

 

 

XP outperforms vista on all new and older hardware.. PERIOD.. no excuses..

its just faster...

 

the reason why Vista needs more is NOT because it has more features but

because its poorly desgined..

 

MS knows this, thats why they are DRASTICALLY sliming down the windows 7

core...

 

 

Guys wake up.. you are the VICTIMS of Vista... brainwashed and made to

comply.

 

 

 

 

"Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote in message

news:ucgcp3duaoav3ajvi37kov5o72kdmcrtcp@4ax.com...

> On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:51:22 -0500, "Mike Hall - MVP"

> <mikehall@mvps.com> wrote:

>

>

>> So what exactly does the test prove? It proves that each Windows version

>> requires more capable hardware is all, hardware that is readily available

>> and relatively cheap.

>

>

> Exactly! Each new version has more features than the one before, and

> doing more requires more and faster hardware.

>

> Fortunately for all of us, over the years the improvements in the

> operating system have been more than matched by improvements and lower

> prices in hardware. So what we get is a better operating system with

> more and better features for less money.

>

> It boggles my mind that people see fit to complain about this.

>

>

> --

> Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User

> Please Reply to the Newsgroup

in real world scenariors vista performes far worse than these benchmarks

show

 

 

lol

 

 

 

"dzomlija" <dzomlija.33lsm6@no-mx.forums.net> wrote in message

news:dzomlija.33lsm6@no-mx.forums.net...

>

> - Bobb -581905 Wrote:

>> 'Windows XP outshines Vista in benchmarking test | CNET News.com'

>> (http://msn-cnet.com.com/Windows-XP-outshines-Vista-in-benchmarking-test/2100-1016_3-6220201.html?tag=newsmap)

>>

>> .... Microsoft has had to allow PC manufacturers to continue to sell XP

>> on

>> new PCs, setting a deadline for the last sale at January 31. However,

>> the

>> pressure from manufacturers and consumers has been so great that

>> Microsoft

>> has been forced to extend the deadline another five months, until June.

>

> The results of any benchmark test are about as effective as sunblock is

> to a nuclear explosion - Utterly pointless!

>

> As just about anyone would tell you, benchmark programs are usually

> written with specific operating systems in mind. If the benchmarking

> program for XP is run on Vista, the results will be skewed, and cannot

> be taken as gospel. And comparing the scores of a XP Benchmark program

> with those of a Vista benchmark program is like comparing apples with

> oranges. They cannot be categorically compared.

>

> What truly determines the viability of any OS is it's real-world

> performance, not a synthetic benchmark, And in the past year in which

> I've been using Vista, my conclusion is this - Despite it's greater

> system requirements, my day-to-day productivity has improved. And that

> is where the difference is. I can work more efficiently than I ever

> could on XP.

>

>

> --

> dzomlija

>

> _____________________

> Peter Alexander Dzomlija

> -Do you hear, huh? The Alpha and The Omega? Death and Rebirth? And as

> you die, so shall I be Reborn...-

>

> -Download MP3 Media Properties Explorer: --http://www.phx.co.za-

>

> - ASUS A8N32-SLI-Deluxe

> - AMD Athlon 64 Dual-Core 4800+

> - 4GB DDR400

> - 128MB ASUS nVidia 6600

> - Thermaltake Tai-Chi Chassis

> - 1207GB Formatted Storage

> - Vista Ultimate x64

> - CodeGear Delphi 2007See my rig at:

> http://s229.photobucket.com/albums/ee312/Dzomlija/Venus/

In whose real world scenarios?

 

Once my completed the (rather short) learning curve, Vista is a delight.

 

"Joe cann" <joe@beerget.com> wrote in message

news:479651bf@newsgate.x-privat.org...

> in real world scenariors vista performes far worse than these benchmarks

> show

>

>

> lol

>

>

>

> "dzomlija" <dzomlija.33lsm6@no-mx.forums.net> wrote in message

> news:dzomlija.33lsm6@no-mx.forums.net...

>>

>> - Bobb -581905 Wrote:

>>> 'Windows XP outshines Vista in benchmarking test | CNET News.com'

>>> (http://msn-cnet.com.com/Windows-XP-outshines-Vista-in-benchmarking-test/2100-1016_3-6220201.html?tag=newsmap)

>>>

>>> .... Microsoft has had to allow PC manufacturers to continue to sell XP

>>> on

>>> new PCs, setting a deadline for the last sale at January 31. However,

>>> the

>>> pressure from manufacturers and consumers has been so great that

>>> Microsoft

>>> has been forced to extend the deadline another five months, until June.

>>

>> The results of any benchmark test are about as effective as sunblock is

>> to a nuclear explosion - Utterly pointless!

>>

>> As just about anyone would tell you, benchmark programs are usually

>> written with specific operating systems in mind. If the benchmarking

>> program for XP is run on Vista, the results will be skewed, and cannot

>> be taken as gospel. And comparing the scores of a XP Benchmark program

>> with those of a Vista benchmark program is like comparing apples with

>> oranges. They cannot be categorically compared.

>>

>> What truly determines the viability of any OS is it's real-world

>> performance, not a synthetic benchmark, And in the past year in which

>> I've been using Vista, my conclusion is this - Despite it's greater

>> system requirements, my day-to-day productivity has improved. And that

>> is where the difference is. I can work more efficiently than I ever

>> could on XP.

>>

>>

>> --

>> dzomlija

>>

>> _____________________

>> Peter Alexander Dzomlija

>> -Do you hear, huh? The Alpha and The Omega? Death and Rebirth? And as

>> you die, so shall I be Reborn...-

>>

>> -Download MP3 Media Properties Explorer: --http://www.phx.co.za-

>>

>> - ASUS A8N32-SLI-Deluxe

>> - AMD Athlon 64 Dual-Core 4800+

>> - 4GB DDR400

>> - 128MB ASUS nVidia 6600

>> - Thermaltake Tai-Chi Chassis

>> - 1207GB Formatted Storage

>> - Vista Ultimate x64

>> - CodeGear Delphi 2007See my rig at:

>> http://s229.photobucket.com/albums/ee312/Dzomlija/Venus/

>

>

Joe cann582008 Wrote:

> nice to see 2 brainwashed MS drones agreeing with eachother...

>

> how pathetic...

>

> XP outperforms vista on all new and older hardware.. PERIOD.. no

> excuses..

> its just faster...

>

> the reason why Vista needs more is NOT because it has more features but

> because its poorly desgined..

>

> MS knows this, thats why they are DRASTICALLY sliming down the windows

> 7 core...

>

> Guys wake up.. you are the VICTIMS of Vista... brainwashed and made to

> comply.

 

And for just in case you misunderstood their work on Windows 7, this

may come as a surprise to you - Work on Windows 7 didn't start after the

relase of Vista. The original code name of Windows 7 was I believe

"Blackcomb", or something like that. R&D for what will become Windows 7

started nearly 6 years ago.

 

Windows 7 is not a result of poor Vista design.

 

The only drone here in this conversation is you.

 

You "overheard" someone saying, or read on some 5-year-olds blog that

Microsoft is giving priority coding time to Windows 7. You are too dumb

to use your brain, and the only logical conclusion you can come up with

is that Vista is so bad, Microsoft is forced to do this. Why would

Microsoft tie their best OS coders to a product that has already been

released?

 

When Microsoft went Gold on Vista, those same coders that where working

on Vista where moved to the Windows 7 project, at which time those Win7

R&D guys where moved to begin research on whatever will eventually

replace Windows 7!

 

 

--

dzomlija

 

_____________________

Peter Alexander Dzomlija

-Do you hear, huh? The Alpha and The Omega? Death and Rebirth? And as

you die, so shall I be Reborn...-

 

-Download MP3 Media Properties Explorer: --http://www.phx.co.za-

 

- ASUS A8N32-SLI-Deluxe

- AMD Athlon 64 Dual-Core 4800+

- 4GB DDR400

- 128MB ASUS nVidia 6600

- Thermaltake Tai-Chi Chassis

- 1207GB Formatted Storage

- Vista Ultimate x64

- CodeGear Delphi 2007See my rig at: http://s229.photobucket.com/albums/ee312/Dzomlija/Venus/

"Joe cann" <joe@beerget.com> wrote in message

news:479650ff$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...

> nice to see 2 brainwashed MS drones agreeing with eachother...

>

>

> how pathetic...

>

>

> XP outperforms vista on all new and older hardware.. PERIOD.. no excuses..

> its just faster...

>

> the reason why Vista needs more is NOT because it has more features but

> because its poorly desgined..

>

> MS knows this, thats why they are DRASTICALLY sliming down the windows 7

> core...

>

>

> Guys wake up.. you are the VICTIMS of Vista... brainwashed and made to

> comply.

>

>

>

>

> "Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote in message

> news:ucgcp3duaoav3ajvi37kov5o72kdmcrtcp@4ax.com...

>> On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:51:22 -0500, "Mike Hall - MVP"

>> <mikehall@mvps.com> wrote:

>>

>>

>>> So what exactly does the test prove? It proves that each Windows version

>>> requires more capable hardware is all, hardware that is readily

>>> available

>>> and relatively cheap.

>>

>>

>> Exactly! Each new version has more features than the one before, and

>> doing more requires more and faster hardware.

>>

>> Fortunately for all of us, over the years the improvements in the

>> operating system have been more than matched by improvements and lower

>> prices in hardware. So what we get is a better operating system with

>> more and better features for less money.

>>

>> It boggles my mind that people see fit to complain about this.

>>

>>

>> --

>> Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User

>> Please Reply to the Newsgroup

>

>

 

 

It does have more features. They are just not riveted to the outside is

all..

 

And Windows 2000 outperforms XP, but we all knew that anyway.

 

Please tell us something new at least..

 

--

Mike Hall - MVP

http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx

Joe cann wrote:

> in real world scenariors vista performes far worse than these benchmarks

> show

>

>

> lol

>

>

>

> "dzomlija" <dzomlija.33lsm6@no-mx.forums.net> wrote in message

> news:dzomlija.33lsm6@no-mx.forums.net...

>

>>- Bobb -581905 Wrote:

>>

>>>'Windows XP outshines Vista in benchmarking test | CNET News.com'

>>>(http://msn-cnet.com.com/Windows-XP-outshines-Vista-in-benchmarking-test/2100-1016_3-6220201.html?tag=newsmap)

>>>

>>>.... Microsoft has had to allow PC manufacturers to continue to sell XP

>>>on

>>>new PCs, setting a deadline for the last sale at January 31. However,

>>>the

>>>pressure from manufacturers and consumers has been so great that

>>>Microsoft

>>>has been forced to extend the deadline another five months, until June.

>>

>>The results of any benchmark test are about as effective as sunblock is

>>to a nuclear explosion - Utterly pointless!

>>

>>As just about anyone would tell you, benchmark programs are usually

>>written with specific operating systems in mind. If the benchmarking

>>program for XP is run on Vista, the results will be skewed, and cannot

>>be taken as gospel. And comparing the scores of a XP Benchmark program

>>with those of a Vista benchmark program is like comparing apples with

>>oranges. They cannot be categorically compared.

>>

>>What truly determines the viability of any OS is it's real-world

>>performance, not a synthetic benchmark, And in the past year in which

>>I've been using Vista, my conclusion is this - Despite it's greater

>>system requirements, my day-to-day productivity has improved. And that

>>is where the difference is. I can work more efficiently than I ever

>>could on XP.

>>

>>

>>--

>>dzomlija

>>

>>_____________________

>>Peter Alexander Dzomlija

>>-Do you hear, huh? The Alpha and The Omega? Death and Rebirth? And as

>>you die, so shall I be Reborn...-

>>

>>-Download MP3 Media Properties Explorer: --http://www.phx.co.za-

>>

>>- ASUS A8N32-SLI-Deluxe

>>- AMD Athlon 64 Dual-Core 4800+

>>- 4GB DDR400

>>- 128MB ASUS nVidia 6600

>>- Thermaltake Tai-Chi Chassis

>>- 1207GB Formatted Storage

>>- Vista Ultimate x64

>>- CodeGear Delphi 2007See my rig at:

>>http://s229.photobucket.com/albums/ee312/Dzomlija/Venus/

>

>

>

hehehe...you don't live in a real world.

Frank

Joe cann wrote:

> nice to see 2 brainwashed MS drones agreeing with eachother...

>

>

> how pathetic...

>

>

> XP outperforms vista on all new and older hardware.. PERIOD.. no excuses..

> its just faster...

>

> the reason why Vista needs more is NOT because it has more features but

> because its poorly desgined..

>

> MS knows this, thats why they are DRASTICALLY sliming down the windows 7

> core...

 

It's capin' crunch...again!

Hey you fukkin stupid as*hole...you know nothing at all about W7.

Get a life you stupid jackas* loser.

Frank

dzomlija wrote:

> Joe cann582008 Wrote:

>> nice to see 2 brainwashed MS drones agreeing with eachother...

>>

>> how pathetic...

>>

>> XP outperforms vista on all new and older hardware.. PERIOD.. no

>> excuses..

>> its just faster...

>>

>> the reason why Vista needs more is NOT because it has more features but

>> because its poorly desgined..

>>

>> MS knows this, thats why they are DRASTICALLY sliming down the windows

>> 7 core...

>>

>> Guys wake up.. you are the VICTIMS of Vista... brainwashed and made to

>> comply.

>

> And for just in case you misunderstood their work on Windows 7, this

> may come as a surprise to you - Work on Windows 7 didn't start after the

> relase of Vista. The original code name of Windows 7 was I believe

> "Blackcomb", or something like that. R&D for what will become Windows 7

> started nearly 6 years ago.

 

I thought it was Vienna.

>

> Windows 7 is not a result of poor Vista design.

>

> The only drone here in this conversation is you.

>

> You "overheard" someone saying, or read on some 5-year-olds blog that

> Microsoft is giving priority coding time to Windows 7. You are too dumb

> to use your brain, and the only logical conclusion you can come up with

> is that Vista is so bad, Microsoft is forced to do this. Why would

> Microsoft tie their best OS coders to a product that has already been

> released?

>

> When Microsoft went Gold on Vista, those same coders that where working

> on Vista where moved to the Windows 7 project, at which time those Win7

> R&D guys where moved to begin research on whatever will eventually

> replace Windows 7!

>

>

 

I will be looking eagerly at Windows 7. For those of us who do not like

Vista very much, hopefully MS puts out an OS we like in the next version.

 

--

Priceless quotes in m.p.w.vista.general group -

Submit your nomination at the link below:

http://protectfreedom.tripod.com/kick.html

 

View nominations already submitted:

http://htmlgear.tripod.com/guest/control.guest?u=protectfreedom&i=1&a=view

 

"Fair use is not merely a nice concept--it is a federal law based on

free speech rights under the First Amendment and is a cornerstone of the

creativity and innovation that is a hallmark of this country. Consumer

rights in the digital age are not frivolous."

- Maura Corbett

"The poster formerly known as 'The Poster Formerly Known as Nina DiBoy'"

<none@none.not> wrote in message news:fn5o97$hdl$1@aioe.org...

> I thought it was Vienna.

>

 

Blackcomb was the original codename, which later got changed to Vienna

AFAICR.

 

 

--

Jane, not plain ) 64 bit enabled :-)

Batteries not included. Braincell on vacation -)

MVP Windows Shell/User

here is something new Mr drone man....

 

winXP had lots of nice features over win2k, so we would exchange some CPU

cycles for feature sake...

 

Whoever was saying back then that XP was not good was a naysayer!

 

Vista has nothing that is of worth... above XP (remember XP also had MCE and

Tablet editions), only that stupid inflexible aero glass theme.

 

Whoever says Vista is better than XP is a technological NAYSAYER also! They

dont care about what is better.. they only care about what is new.

In this case the new one is not better, its a huge leap backwards..

 

lets hope for microsofts sake that windows 7 will be better.. because If it

has anything to do with vista people will flock away from the "collective".

 

 

 

"Mike Hall - MVP" <mikehall@mvps.com> wrote in message

news:ORbolsTXIHA.4440@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

> "Joe cann" <joe@beerget.com> wrote in message

> news:479650ff$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...

>> nice to see 2 brainwashed MS drones agreeing with eachother...

>>

>>

>> how pathetic...

>>

>>

>> XP outperforms vista on all new and older hardware.. PERIOD.. no

>> excuses..

>> its just faster...

>>

>> the reason why Vista needs more is NOT because it has more features but

>> because its poorly desgined..

>>

>> MS knows this, thats why they are DRASTICALLY sliming down the windows 7

>> core...

>>

>>

>> Guys wake up.. you are the VICTIMS of Vista... brainwashed and made to

>> comply.

>>

>>

>>

>>

>> "Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote in message

>> news:ucgcp3duaoav3ajvi37kov5o72kdmcrtcp@4ax.com...

>>> On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:51:22 -0500, "Mike Hall - MVP"

>>> <mikehall@mvps.com> wrote:

>>>

>>>

>>>> So what exactly does the test prove? It proves that each Windows

>>>> version

>>>> requires more capable hardware is all, hardware that is readily

>>>> available

>>>> and relatively cheap.

>>>

>>>

>>> Exactly! Each new version has more features than the one before, and

>>> doing more requires more and faster hardware.

>>>

>>> Fortunately for all of us, over the years the improvements in the

>>> operating system have been more than matched by improvements and lower

>>> prices in hardware. So what we get is a better operating system with

>>> more and better features for less money.

>>>

>>> It boggles my mind that people see fit to complain about this.

>>>

>>>

>>> --

>>> Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User

>>> Please Reply to the Newsgroup

>>

>>

>

>

> It does have more features. They are just not riveted to the outside is

> all..

>

> And Windows 2000 outperforms XP, but we all knew that anyway.

>

> Please tell us something new at least..

>

> --

> Mike Hall - MVP

> http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx

>

>

>

>

On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:45:52 -0500, Alias <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote:

 

>

> And with Ubuntu being downloaded at the rate of a million downloads a

> month, expect XP to be extended even further and expect an SP4.

>

> Alias

 

Uhmmm...sorry...that was me.

I had a lot of trouble in the beginning.

On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:22:44 -0500, Tiberius on Vista da pathetic OS

<Tiberius@is.bak> wrote:

> here is something new Mr drone man....

>

> winXP had lots of nice features over win2k, so we would exchange some

> CPU cycles for feature sake...

>

> Whoever was saying back then that XP was not good was a naysayer!

>

> Vista has nothing that is of worth... above XP (remember XP also had MCE

> and Tablet editions), only that stupid inflexible aero glass theme.

>

> Whoever says Vista is better than XP is a technological NAYSAYER also!

> They dont care about what is better.. they only care about what is new.

> In this case the new one is not better, its a huge leap backwards..

>

> lets hope for microsofts sake that windows 7 will be better.. because If

> it has anything to do with vista people will flock away from the

> "collective".

>

>

>

 

Hey...Tuberculosis...you finally stole Vista.

Good for you.

Don't get caught !

Tiberius on Vista da pathetic OS wrote:

 

 

....just his usual, uninformed, bullsh*t!

Get a life you idiot.

Frank

> lets hope for microsofts sake that windows 7 will be better.. because If

> it has anything to do with vista people will flock away from the

> "collective".

 

Just purchased a new Gateway laptop. The only OS choice was Windows Vista. I

formatted it and installed XP right away but found that the backlight

doesn't function with the Intel XP drivers.

 

....so now it's happily running Linux.

 

Vista is horrible. I'd rather run Windows ME if I was forced to use

Windows!!!

Noozer wrote:

>> lets hope for microsofts sake that windows 7 will be better.. because If

>> it has anything to do with vista people will flock away from the

>> "collective".

>

> Just purchased a new Gateway laptop. The only OS choice was Windows Vista. I

> formatted it and installed XP right away but found that the backlight

> doesn't function with the Intel XP drivers.

>

> ...so now it's happily running Linux.

>

> Vista is horrible. I'd rather run Windows ME if I was forced to use

> Windows!!!

>

>

 

Too bad your not posting from Linux...doh !

I am astonished to find the lowest kind of life form not in any distant

galaxy,

not on some forgoten moon, but here on earth...

 

we have a name for it.. its called FRANK

 

 

"Frank" <fb@samm.zrr> wrote in message

news:en8mCYUXIHA.1164@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

> Tiberius on Vista da pathetic OS wrote:

>

>

> ...just his usual, uninformed, bullsh*t!

> Get a life you idiot.

> Frank

how is that vista shrine you are building coming along?

 

Do you kneel for your vista god 3 times again as you promised it?

 

After Frank you are the second most stupid person in this newsgroup..

 

you cant beat frank ever, but you are a nice substitute for us smart non

people to kick around

when the king of fools is not around.

 

"forty-nine" <110001@49.xyz> wrote in message news:fn5r2n$q5r$1@aioe.org...

> Noozer wrote:

>>> lets hope for microsofts sake that windows 7 will be better.. because If

>>> it has anything to do with vista people will flock away from the

>>> "collective".

>>

>> Just purchased a new Gateway laptop. The only OS choice was Windows

>> Vista. I formatted it and installed XP right away but found that the

>> backlight doesn't function with the Intel XP drivers.

>>

>> ...so now it's happily running Linux.

>>

>> Vista is horrible. I'd rather run Windows ME if I was forced to use

>> Windows!!!

>

> Too bad your not posting from Linux...doh !