Donald L McDaniel wrote:

> On Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:42:12 -0600, The poster formerly known as 'The

> Poster Formerly Known as Nina DiBoy' <none@none.not> wrote:

>

>> Donald L McDaniel wrote:

>>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 20:18:20 -0600, The poster formerly known as 'The

>>> Poster Formerly Known as Nina DiBoy' <none@none.not> wrote:

>>>

>>>> Donald L McDaniel wrote:

>>>>> On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:50:50 GMT, "Brian W"

>>>>> <brian.wescombeSODOFF@ntlSPAMworld.com> wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> "Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message

>>>>>> news:O3$tMVbMIHA.5172@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>>>>>>> How many paying customers know the difference between an OEM or a retail

>>>>>>> copy?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>> Even MS don't know apparently. I re-activated my generic OEM Vista by

>>>>>> telling the operator I purchased it in a retail store (which is technically

>>>>>> true, even though it isn't a 'retail' version).

>

> Question: WHY did you do that? Why didn't you just tell them the

> truth? Or would the truth have convicted you of misusing your

> license?

>

> Honest men are usually willing to believe even the lies of dishonest

> men, but dishonest men are never willing to believe the truth.

>

>>>>> Which only proves what I have been saying all along: The Activation

>>>>> techs are told by Microsoft to bend over backward in ensuring that

>>>>> customers leave the phone with a POSITIVE experience, whether they

>>>>> deserve it or not.

>>>>>

>>>>> They are TRULY committed to their customers' satisfaction.

>>>>> Unlike many others.

>>>>>

>>>>> Donald L McDaniel.

>

>>>> Wow, Ok, I'm flabbergasted after reading this post.

>>>> Daniel [sic., my name is actually Donald, not Daniel -- or McDaniel, if you prefer

>>>> to call me by my father's surname. The Author], you are so

>>>> out of touch with reality if you think MS is 'TRULY committed to their

>>>> customers' satisfaction'!

>>> Evidently, sir, YOU seem to be the one who is out of touch with

>>> reality, since you cannot even tell the difference between a surname

>>> and a Christian name.

>> LOL, 'sir'? Not the last time I checked. Your reading comprehension

>> skills must be as good, you address me as a male when I have a female name.

>

> "Female name"? Where do you get this, friend?

> You sign yourself as "The poster who formerly was the poster known as

> 'Nina DeBoy' ", or some such nonsense. How am I to know from that

> that you wish to be referred to in the feminine? For all I know, I

> could just as easily interpret your nonsensical alias as meaning you

> just had a "gender change" operation, and now wish to be referred to

> in the masculine.

 

Is Nina a man's name?

>

> The fact is, it is NOT PROPER English Grammar to use a gender-specific

> alias for the purpose of maintaining anonymity in the Public. To

> remain completely anonymous, one's gender must be completely hidden

> from the Public. To do this, one must use an alias which contains no

> intrinsic gender information, or which contains gender information

> consistent with the gender the writer wishes to present

> himself/herself to the public as, while hiding his/her true gender and

> identity..

 

Yes Net Nanny.

>

> The difference between YOUR public appelation and MINE is simple:

> YOURS is an alias, bearing no actual resemblance to your true name, as

> found on your Birth Certificate.

 

You don't know that, you ASSume that.

> Therefore, it in no way identifies

> you publically. Aliases are good tools for appearing in public while

> maintaining relative anonymity.

>

> MINE is my true name, as found on my Birth Certificate, and with the

> information on that Certificate of Live Birth, identifies me as Donald

> L. McDaniel..

>

> Some folks who use aliases quite often:

> * snitches

> * narcs

> * thieves

> * adulterers

> * gangsters

> * some posters on the Usenet who must remain nameless, since they

> never use their names

 

You are biased and have a clear prejudice against those who value their

privacy and wish to remain anonymous. I pity you.

>

> Some folks who did not use aliases at all:

> * ALL the signers of the 1776 Declaration of Independence.

>

>>> I have been using Microsoft OSes since the 80's, and have never found

>>> Microsoft to be uncommitted to their customer's satisfaction.

>>>

>>> Donald L McDaniel

>> This would be the difference between you and most of the rest of the

>> world. Your reality from what you are espousing here is the same view

>> of 'reality' that those with their head up MS's collective arse have.

>

> Hmmm....

> I would put that "Your view of reality, as shown by your words in this

> thread, is the same view of reality espoused by those with their

> collective heads up Microsoft's arse."

>

> But if you prefer your confusing view of reality, as shown by your own

> words above, that is your perogative.

>

> Our written speech is always a clear representation of our grasp on

> reality. If we write clearly, it shows that we have a clear view of

> reality. If we write confusedly, it shows that we ourselves are

> confused.

>

> Your words, madame, are certainly confused. Which shows me that you

> are confused. I certainly want no part of your confusion, and prefer

> my "different" view of reality.

>

> Donald McDaniel

 

 

 

--

Priceless quotes in m.p.w.vista.general group -

Submit your nomination at the link below:

http://protectfreedom.tripod.com/kick.html

 

"Fair use is not merely a nice concept--it is a federal law based on

free speech rights under the First Amendment and is a cornerstone of the

creativity and innovation that is a hallmark of this country. Consumer

rights in the digital age are not frivolous."

- Maura Corbett

On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 11:43:04 +0100, Alias <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote:

>Donald L McDaniel wrote:

>

>>

>> MINE is my true name, as found on my Birth Certificate, and with the

>> information on that Certificate of Live Birth, identifies me as Donald

>> L. McDaniel..

>

>So you say but cannot prove. For all we know, your real name is Ronald

>McDonald.

>

>Alias

 

Why should I prove anything to you? Are you God or the government?

 

Also, since I do not use an alias, I have no need to prove my

identity.

 

"A dishonest man will refuse to believe even the truth when it is

presented to him, while an honest man is always willing to "believe

all things, hope all things, endure all things."

 

This may be why you refuse to believe the truth when it is presented

to you.

 

It's very possible that you can't even recognize the truth when it is

presented to you.

 

Donald L McDaniel

On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:06:56 -0600, The poster formerly known as 'The

Poster Formerly Known as Nina DiBoy' <none@none.not> wrote:

>Donald L McDaniel wrote:

>> On Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:42:12 -0600, The poster formerly known as 'The

>> Poster Formerly Known as Nina DiBoy' <none@none.not> wrote:

>>

>>> Donald L McDaniel wrote:

>>>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 20:18:20 -0600, The poster formerly known as 'The

>>>> Poster Formerly Known as Nina DiBoy' <none@none.not> wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> Donald L McDaniel wrote:

>>>>>> On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:50:50 GMT, "Brian W"

>>>>>> <brian.wescombeSODOFF@ntlSPAMworld.com> wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> "Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message

>>>>>>> news:O3$tMVbMIHA.5172@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>>>>>>>> How many paying customers know the difference between an OEM or a retail

>>>>>>>> copy?

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Even MS don't know apparently. I re-activated my generic OEM Vista by

>>>>>>> telling the operator I purchased it in a retail store (which is technically

>>>>>>> true, even though it isn't a 'retail' version).

>>

>> Question: WHY did you do that? Why didn't you just tell them the

>> truth? Or would the truth have convicted you of misusing your

>> license?

>>

>> Honest men are usually willing to believe even the lies of dishonest

>> men, but dishonest men are never willing to believe the truth.

>>

>>>>>> Which only proves what I have been saying all along: The Activation

>>>>>> techs are told by Microsoft to bend over backward in ensuring that

>>>>>> customers leave the phone with a POSITIVE experience, whether they

>>>>>> deserve it or not.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> They are TRULY committed to their customers' satisfaction.

>>>>>> Unlike many others.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Donald L McDaniel.

>>

>>>>> Wow, Ok, I'm flabbergasted after reading this post.

>>>>> Daniel [sic., my name is actually Donald, not Daniel -- or McDaniel, if you prefer

>>>>> to call me by my father's surname. The Author], you are so

>>>>> out of touch with reality if you think MS is 'TRULY committed to their

>>>>> customers' satisfaction'!

>>>> Evidently, sir, YOU seem to be the one who is out of touch with

>>>> reality, since you cannot even tell the difference between a surname

>>>> and a Christian name.

>>> LOL, 'sir'? Not the last time I checked. Your reading comprehension

>>> skills must be as good, you address me as a male when I have a female name.

>>

>> "Female name"? Where do you get this, friend?

>> You sign yourself as "The poster who formerly was the poster known as

>> 'Nina DeBoy' ", or some such nonsense. How am I to know from that

>> that you wish to be referred to in the feminine? For all I know, I

>> could just as easily interpret your nonsensical alias as meaning you

>> just had a "gender change" operation, and now wish to be referred to

>> in the masculine.

>

>Is Nina a man's name?

 

That depends, friend:

1) Perhaps you are a Lesbian who is a "butch" who prefers to call

herself "Nina DeBoy" because you feel as if you are a man in a woman's

body (sounds very suspicious to me, in fact -- you know, "Nina the

boy").

2) Perhaps you are a homosexual man who prefers to call himself by a

woman's name ("Nina DeBoy") because you feel as if you are really a

woman inside a man's body. (ridiculous, of course).

>

>>

>> The fact is, it is NOT PROPER English Grammar to use a gender-specific

>> alias for the purpose of maintaining anonymity in the Public. To

>> remain completely anonymous, one's gender must be completely hidden

>> from the Public. To do this, one must use an alias which contains no

>> intrinsic gender information, or which contains gender information

>> consistent with the gender the writer wishes to present

>> himself/herself to the public as, while hiding his/her true gender and

>> identity..

>

>Yes Net Nanny.

>

>>

>> The difference between YOUR public appelation and MINE is simple:

>> YOURS is an alias, bearing no actual resemblance to your true name, as

>> found on your Birth Certificate.

>

>You don't know that, you ASSume that.

>

>> Therefore, it in no way identifies

>> you publically. Aliases are good tools for appearing in public while

>> maintaining relative anonymity.

>>

>> MINE is my true name, as found on my Birth Certificate, and with the

>> information on that Certificate of Live Birth, identifies me as Donald

>> L. McDaniel..

>>

>> Some folks who use aliases quite often:

>> * snitches

>> * narcs

>> * thieves

>> * adulterers

>> * gangsters

>> * some posters on the Usenet who must remain nameless, since they

>> never use their names

>

>You are biased and have a clear prejudice against those who value their

>privacy and wish to remain anonymous. I pity you.

 

So you admit that "Nina DeBoy" is not your real name? So I can safely

assume that you are some kind of fag who likes to hide its identity

because it feels shamed because of its sexual perversion?

 

BTW, I do admit to "bias": I am "biased" toward reality, the truth,

and proper English Grammar, and "biased" against stupidity in any

form.

>

>>

>> Some folks who did not use aliases at all:

>> * ALL the signers of the 1776 Declaration of Independence.

>>

>>>> I have been using Microsoft OSes since the 80's, and have never found

>>>> Microsoft to be uncommitted to their customer's satisfaction.

>>>>

>>>> Donald L McDaniel

>>> This would be the difference between you and most of the rest of the

>>> world. Your reality from what you are espousing here is the same view

>>> of 'reality' that those with their head up MS's collective arse have.

>>

>> Hmmm....

>> I would put that "Your view of reality, as shown by your words in this

>> thread, is the same view of reality espoused by those with their

>> collective heads up Microsoft's arse."

>>

>> But if you prefer your confusing view of reality, as shown by your own

>> words above, that is your perogative.

>>

>> Our written speech is always a clear representation of our grasp on

>> reality. If we write clearly, it shows that we have a clear view of

>> reality. If we write confusedly, it shows that we ourselves are

>> confused, and live within a confused reality.

>>

>> Your words, madame, are certainly confused. Which shows me that you

>> are confused. I certainly want no part of your confusion, and prefer

>> my "different" view of reality.

>>

>> Donald McDaniel

Donald L McDaniel wrote:

> On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:06:56 -0600, The poster formerly known as 'The

> Poster Formerly Known as Nina DiBoy' <none@none.not> wrote:

>

>> Donald L McDaniel wrote:

>>> On Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:42:12 -0600, The poster formerly known as 'The

>>> Poster Formerly Known as Nina DiBoy' <none@none.not> wrote:

>>>

>>>> Donald L McDaniel wrote:

>>>>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 20:18:20 -0600, The poster formerly known as 'The

>>>>> Poster Formerly Known as Nina DiBoy' <none@none.not> wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> Donald L McDaniel wrote:

>>>>>>> On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:50:50 GMT, "Brian W"

>>>>>>> <brian.wescombeSODOFF@ntlSPAMworld.com> wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> "Alias" <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote in message

>>>>>>>> news:O3$tMVbMIHA.5172@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>>>>>>>>> How many paying customers know the difference between an OEM or a retail

>>>>>>>>> copy?

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Even MS don't know apparently. I re-activated my generic OEM Vista by

>>>>>>>> telling the operator I purchased it in a retail store (which is technically

>>>>>>>> true, even though it isn't a 'retail' version).

>>> Question: WHY did you do that? Why didn't you just tell them the

>>> truth? Or would the truth have convicted you of misusing your

>>> license?

>>>

>>> Honest men are usually willing to believe even the lies of dishonest

>>> men, but dishonest men are never willing to believe the truth.

>>>

>>>>>>> Which only proves what I have been saying all along: The Activation

>>>>>>> techs are told by Microsoft to bend over backward in ensuring that

>>>>>>> customers leave the phone with a POSITIVE experience, whether they

>>>>>>> deserve it or not.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> They are TRULY committed to their customers' satisfaction.

>>>>>>> Unlike many others.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Donald L McDaniel.

>>>>>> Wow, Ok, I'm flabbergasted after reading this post.

>>>>>> Daniel [sic., my name is actually Donald, not Daniel -- or McDaniel, if you prefer

>>>>>> to call me by my father's surname. The Author], you are so

>>>>>> out of touch with reality if you think MS is 'TRULY committed to their

>>>>>> customers' satisfaction'!

>>>>> Evidently, sir, YOU seem to be the one who is out of touch with

>>>>> reality, since you cannot even tell the difference between a surname

>>>>> and a Christian name.

>>>> LOL, 'sir'? Not the last time I checked. Your reading comprehension

>>>> skills must be as good, you address me as a male when I have a female name.

>>> "Female name"? Where do you get this, friend?

>>> You sign yourself as "The poster who formerly was the poster known as

>>> 'Nina DeBoy' ", or some such nonsense. How am I to know from that

>>> that you wish to be referred to in the feminine? For all I know, I

>>> could just as easily interpret your nonsensical alias as meaning you

>>> just had a "gender change" operation, and now wish to be referred to

>>> in the masculine.

>> Is Nina a man's name?

>

> That depends, friend:

> 1) Perhaps you are a Lesbian who is a "butch" who prefers to call

> herself "Nina DeBoy" because you feel as if you are a man in a woman's

> body (sounds very suspicious to me, in fact -- you know, "Nina the

> boy").

> 2) Perhaps you are a homosexual man who prefers to call himself by a

> woman's name ("Nina DeBoy") because you feel as if you are really a

> woman inside a man's body. (ridiculous, of course).

 

It's not DeBoy, it's DiBoy. Never won the spelling B, did you? BTW,

you should keep your projections to yourself, because they really are

quite telling about you.

>>> The fact is, it is NOT PROPER English Grammar to use a gender-specific

>>> alias for the purpose of maintaining anonymity in the Public. To

>>> remain completely anonymous, one's gender must be completely hidden

>>> from the Public. To do this, one must use an alias which contains no

>>> intrinsic gender information, or which contains gender information

>>> consistent with the gender the writer wishes to present

>>> himself/herself to the public as, while hiding his/her true gender and

>>> identity..

>> Yes Net Nanny.

>>

>>> The difference between YOUR public appelation and MINE is simple:

>>> YOURS is an alias, bearing no actual resemblance to your true name, as

>>> found on your Birth Certificate.

>> You don't know that, you ASSume that.

>>

>>> Therefore, it in no way identifies

>>> you publically. Aliases are good tools for appearing in public while

>>> maintaining relative anonymity.

>>>

>>> MINE is my true name, as found on my Birth Certificate, and with the

>>> information on that Certificate of Live Birth, identifies me as Donald

>>> L. McDaniel..

>>>

>>> Some folks who use aliases quite often:

>>> * snitches

>>> * narcs

>>> * thieves

>>> * adulterers

>>> * gangsters

>>> * some posters on the Usenet who must remain nameless, since they

>>> never use their names

>> You are biased and have a clear prejudice against those who value their

>> privacy and wish to remain anonymous. I pity you.

>

> So you admit that "Nina DeBoy" is not your real name?

 

Yes, you spelled it wrong.

> So I can safely

> assume that you are some kind of fag who likes to hide its identity

> because it feels shamed because of its sexual perversion?

 

So are you deviating from reality again here, or are you just following

this line of thought because it turns you on?

>

> BTW, I do admit to "bias": I am "biased" toward reality, the truth,

> and proper English Grammar, and "biased" against stupidity in any

> form.

 

And against proper spelling and hypocrisy.

>

>>> Some folks who did not use aliases at all:

>>> * ALL the signers of the 1776 Declaration of Independence.

>>>

>>>>> I have been using Microsoft OSes since the 80's, and have never found

>>>>> Microsoft to be uncommitted to their customer's satisfaction.

>>>>>

>>>>> Donald L McDaniel

>

>>>> This would be the difference between you and most of the rest of the

>>>> world. Your reality from what you are espousing here is the same view

>>>> of 'reality' that those with their head up MS's collective arse have.

>>> Hmmm....

>>> I would put that "Your view of reality, as shown by your words in this

>>> thread, is the same view of reality espoused by those with their

>>> collective heads up Microsoft's arse."

>>>

>>> But if you prefer your confusing view of reality, as shown by your own

>>> words above, that is your perogative.

>>>

>>> Our written speech is always a clear representation of our grasp on

>>> reality. If we write clearly, it shows that we have a clear view of

>>> reality. If we write confusedly, it shows that we ourselves are

>>> confused, and live within a confused reality.

>>>

>>> Your words, madame, are certainly confused. Which shows me that you

>>> are confused. I certainly want no part of your confusion, and prefer

>>> my "different" view of reality.

>>>

>>> Donald McDaniel

 

 

--

Priceless quotes in m.p.w.vista.general group -

Submit your nomination at the link below:

http://protectfreedom.tripod.com/kick.html

 

View nominations already submitted:

http://htmlgear.tripod.com/guest/control.guest?u=protectfreedom&i=1&a=view

 

"Fair use is not merely a nice concept--it is a federal law based on

free speech rights under the First Amendment and is a cornerstone of the

creativity and innovation that is a hallmark of this country. Consumer

rights in the digital age are not frivolous."

- Maura Corbett

Donald L McDaniel, or whatever his or her real name is, wrote:

> On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 11:43:04 +0100, Alias <alias@aliasmail.com> wrote:

>

>> Donald L McDaniel wrote:

>>

>>> MINE is my true name, as found on my Birth Certificate, and with the

>>> information on that Certificate of Live Birth, identifies me as Donald

>>> L. McDaniel..

>> So you say but cannot prove. For all we know, your real name is Ronald

>> McDonald.

>>

>> Alias

>

> Why should I prove anything to you? Are you God or the government?

 

You are proving many things to many people by the way you post.

>

> Also, since I do not use an alias, I have no need to prove my

> identity.

 

How do we know you're not using an alias? How do you know that my name

isn't really "Alias"?

>

> "A dishonest man will refuse to believe even the truth when it is

> presented to him, while an honest man is always willing to "believe

> all things, hope all things, endure all things."

 

Is this the Bible's way of comparing a realism to naivety?

>

> This may be why you refuse to believe the truth when it is presented

> to you.

 

Gotta know if it's true or not, sorry. Do you still believe in Santa and

the Tooth Fairy? I'm sure your parents presented it to you as the truth

when you were young and gullible.

>

> It's very possible that you can't even recognize the truth when it is

> presented to you.

>

> Donald L McDaniel

 

It's more probable that you can't psychoanalyze someone by reading their

posts on Usenet, speaking of truisms.

 

Alias

Donald L McDaniel wrote:

 

So you admit that "Nina DeBoy" is not your real name? So I can safely

assume that you are some kind of fag who likes to hide its identity

because it feels shamed because of its sexual perversion?

 

BTW, I do admit to "bias": I am "biased" toward reality, the truth,

and proper English Grammar, and "biased" against stupidity in any

form. <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

 

Wow, very telling.

 

Alias