Frank wrote:

> Mang Chai Lyn wrote:

>

> ---idiot remarks from our resident moron removed----

>

> Read'em and weep you idiot!

>

> http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=785

>

> Frank

 

Numbers mean nothing. More people smoke cigarettes than there are

Windows users but that doesn't mean cigarettes are good for you.

 

--

Alias

 

To email me, remove shoes

Alias wrote:

> Frank wrote:

>> Mang Chai Lyn wrote:

>>

>>

>> ----jackass remarks from our resident brain dead moron deleted---

>>

>> Get a life you idiot!

>>

>> Read'em and weep loser.

>>

>> http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=785

>>

>> Frank

>

> More people drink Pepsi and Coke than there are Vista Virus users (or

> Windows for that matter). The fact that billions of people drink Pepsi

> and Coke doesn't mean they are good for you.

>

 

<And you have served everyone of the masses from Mac Donald's Spain

division while on frier #1. You'll do good to make a sale with your Avon

products -- your second job when you're not peddling product here. :)>

dzomlija wrote:

> Mang Chai Lyn505329 Wrote:

>> From what I have heard, is that there has been memos on multinational

>> insurance companies PROHIBITING the techs to install vista in all

>> branches of their corporation... lol

>>

>> Ok sometimes you find a bunch losers doing silly things that defy

>> logic..

>> and you are no exception

>

> From what you have -heard-? "Mang Chai Lyn" (Or should that be "Tie

> Various" or "Alias"?), you say that you have heard of memos prohibiting

> the installation of Vista on corporate machines?

>

> Let's see if you 5-year-old underdeveloped brain can get past this

> suggestion: Until you actually see these memos, and have hard evidence

> to prove your statements, I suggest you keep you your comments to

> yourself.

>

> Or is the concept of providing evidence too much to handle?

>

>

 

Um, I only go by the nick "Alias". Just because there are millions of

Vista users doesn't mean it's a good thing. Many more people drink sodas

and smoke cigarettes than there are Windows users but those numbers do

not indicate that sodas and cigarettes are good for you.

 

--

Alias

 

To email me, remove shoes

"From what I have heard, is that there has been memos on multinational

insurance companies PROHIBITING..."

 

Please post the source for this statement.

Without a source, this can be taken is no more than FUD with only you

knowing the reasons.

 

--

Jupiter Jones [MVP]

http://www3.telus.net/dandemar

http://www.dts-l.org

 

 

"Mang Chai Lyn" <Mango@blubl.ch> wrote in message

news:47308991$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...> Ask if the computer is

insured from installing stupid OS's called vista by

> stupid techs.

>

> From what I have heard, is that there has been memos on

> multinational insurance companies PROHIBITING the techs to install

> vista in all branches of their corporation... lol

>

> Ok sometimes you find a bunch losers doing silly things that defy

> logic.. and you are no exception

Alias wrote:

> dzomlija wrote:

>> Mang Chai Lyn505329 Wrote:

>>> From what I have heard, is that there has been memos on multinational

>>> insurance companies PROHIBITING the techs to install vista in all

>>> branches of their corporation... lol

>>>

>>> Ok sometimes you find a bunch losers doing silly things that defy

>>> logic..

>>> and you are no exception

>>

>> From what you have -heard-? "Mang Chai Lyn" (Or should that be "Tie

>> Various" or "Alias"?), you say that you have heard of memos prohibiting

>> the installation of Vista on corporate machines?

>> Let's see if you 5-year-old underdeveloped brain can get past this

>> suggestion: Until you actually see these memos, and have hard evidence

>> to prove your statements, I suggest you keep you your comments to

>> yourself.

>>

>> Or is the concept of providing evidence too much to handle?

>>

>>

>

> Um, I only go by the nick "Alias". Just because there are millions of

> Vista users doesn't mean it's a good thing. Many more people drink sodas

> and smoke cigarettes than there are Windows users but those numbers do

> not indicate that sodas and cigarettes are good for you.

>

 

<Someone want to explain what set Betty Crocker off on food when she can

hardly toast a piece of toast in her Linux controlled toaster?>

"Alias" <iamalias@gmailshoes.com> wrote in message

news:fgqgm0$3g1$2@aioe.org...

> Frank wrote:

>> Mang Chai Lyn wrote:

>>

>> ---idiot remarks from our resident moron removed----

>>

>> Read'em and weep you idiot!

>>

>> http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=785

>>

>> Frank

>

> Numbers mean nothing. More people smoke cigarettes than there are Windows

> users but that doesn't mean cigarettes are good for you.

>

 

Yea, don't worry about the SMALL Linux/Ubuntu numbers. Ubuntu still ISN'T

good for you !!!!

> --

> Alias

>

> To email me, remove shoes

"Alias" <iamalias@gmailshoes.com> wrote in message

news:fgqfkq$t4$2@aioe.org...

> Frank wrote:

>> Mang Chai Lyn wrote:

>>

>>

>> ----jackass remarks from our resident brain dead moron deleted---

>>

>> Get a life you idiot!

>>

>> Read'em and weep loser.

>>

>> http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=785

>>

>> Frank

>

> More people drink Pepsi and Coke than there are Vista Virus users (or

> Windows for that matter). The fact that billions of people drink Pepsi and

> Coke doesn't mean they are good for you.

 

The fact that you tell everyone about Ubuntu doesn't mean it's good for you.

It isn't. Stay away. Far away from Linux/Ubuntu.

>

> --

> Alias

>

> To email me, remove shoes

"ray" <ray@zianet.com> wrote in message

news:pan.2007.11.06.19.49.29.510834@zianet.com...

> On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 12:24:33 +0200, Mang Chai Lyn wrote:

>

>> I love the comments that I see rolling in this newsgroup.

>> More and more people are throwing MUD at Vista,

>> and it really deserves it.

>>

>> People are not DUMB they know vista is BAD, despite the MS hype about

>> millions of sales.. the truth will shine.

>

> I beg to differ. People are dumb.

 

You should know, You are their KING.

Now go to the Ubuntu forum and help the LOSERS there.

>

>>

>> Well some people ARE DUMB, and those LOVE Vista!

>>

>> -Lets go forward & lets leave vista behind, lets forget it, just like the

>> horrible nightmare it is.

>

On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 11:17:47 -0800, Frank <fb@osspan.clm> wrote:

>JanJ wrote:

>> "Mang Chai Lyn" wrote:

>>

>>

>>>From what I have heard, is that there has been memos on multinational

>>>insurance companies PROHIBITING the techs to install vista in all branches

>>>of their corporation... lol

>>

>>

>> This is remarkably interesting information! Can you substantiate it, or at

>> least tell us what companies' IT departments have been given such orders?

>>

>> It would also be of great interest to know where you found the professional

>> advice on avoiding Vista, you mentioned something about professionals from

>> all fields in an earlier post.

>>

>> Jan

>

>

>Pay no attention to what capin' crunch says. He's obviously not been

>selected for some promotion or something that is related to Vista in

>some way or another and he's so pissed off about not making the grade

>(he is stupid you know) that he constantly posts his rants in this Vista ng.

>He's harmless.

>Frank

 

 

Speaking of harmless, the idiot posting as "Frank" is a pathological

liar, a proud graduate of the sixth grade, a mental patient and all

around kiss up to Microsoft.

 

Wow, those are some credentials you got Frank.

On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 13:01:54 -0700, "Jupiter Jones [MVP]"

<jones_jupiter@hotnomail.com> wrote:

>"From what I have heard, is that there has been memos on multinational

>insurance companies PROHIBITING..."

>

>Please post the source for this statement.

>Without a source, this can be taken is no more than FUD with only you

>knowing the reasons.

 

How come YOU never give any cites to back up the crapola that so

freely flows from your mouth, you clueless and always arrogant gas

bag.

In article <B941DCBE-992C-42A3-BF70-8B9CA0AFE5BC@microsoft.com>,

JanJ@discussions.microsoft.com says...

> Can any of our regular anti Vista flamers explain why so much of your

> precious time is spent on a thing you don't enjoy?

 

I setup a BOZO Filter for Adam, Alias and Frank - if their names appear

in the poster or body I don't see the post, it's the best dang thing

I've done on Usenet in years. This group now shows about 188 posts over

a 12-16 hour period instead of 400+, and it's a lot easier to read since

the chaff is gone.

 

You might try it too - it's made this group a pleasure to read again.

 

--

 

Leythos

- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.

- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a

drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"

spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)

On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 16:05:19 -0500, Leythos <void@nowhere.lan> wrote:

>In article <B941DCBE-992C-42A3-BF70-8B9CA0AFE5BC@microsoft.com>,

>JanJ@discussions.microsoft.com says...

>> Can any of our regular anti Vista flamers explain why so much of your

>> precious time is spent on a thing you don't enjoy?

>

>I setup a BOZO Filter for Adam, Alias and Frank - if their names appear

>in the poster or body I don't see the post, it's the best dang thing

>I've done on Usenet in years.

 

Which confirms you haven't done much.

Adam Albright wrote:

> On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 16:05:19 -0500, Leythos <void@nowhere.lan> wrote:

>

>> In article <B941DCBE-992C-42A3-BF70-8B9CA0AFE5BC@microsoft.com>,

>> JanJ@discussions.microsoft.com says...

>>> Can any of our regular anti Vista flamers explain why so much of your

>>> precious time is spent on a thing you don't enjoy?

>> I setup a BOZO Filter for Adam, Alias and Frank - if their names appear

>> in the poster or body I don't see the post, it's the best dang thing

>> I've done on Usenet in years.

>

> Which confirms you haven't done much.

>

 

<You must be hurt.>

JanJ wrote:

> "Mang Chai Lyn" wrote:

>

>> From what I have heard, is that there has been memos on multinational

>> insurance companies PROHIBITING the techs to install vista in all branches

>> of their corporation... lol

>

> This is remarkably interesting information! Can you substantiate it, or at

> least tell us what companies' IT departments have been given such orders?

 

The one I work at for one...

 

--

Priceless quotes in m.p.w.vista.general group:

http://protectfreedom.tripod.com/kick.html

 

"Fair use is not merely a nice concept--it is a federal law based on

free speech rights under the First Amendment and is a cornerstone of the

creativity and innovation that is a hallmark of this country. Consumer

rights in the digital age are not frivolous."

- Maura Corbett

Alias wrote:

> Frank wrote:

>

>> Mang Chai Lyn wrote:

>>

>>

>> ----jackass remarks from our resident brain dead moron deleted---

>>

>> Get a life you idiot!

>>

>> Read'em and weep loser.

>>

>> http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=785

>>

>> Frank

>

>

> More people drink Pepsi and Coke than there are Vista Virus users (or

> Windows for that matter). The fact that billions of people drink Pepsi

> and Coke doesn't mean they are good for you.

>

 

Lying, like you do constantly, is also not a good thing, but you

continue doing it.

Frank

Alias wrote:

> dzomlija wrote:

>

>> Mang Chai Lyn505329 Wrote:

>>

>>> From what I have heard, is that there has been memos on multinational

>>> insurance companies PROHIBITING the techs to install vista in all

>>> branches of their corporation... lol

>>>

>>> Ok sometimes you find a bunch losers doing silly things that defy

>>> logic..

>>> and you are no exception

>>

>>

>> From what you have -heard-? "Mang Chai Lyn" (Or should that be "Tie

>> Various" or "Alias"?), you say that you have heard of memos prohibiting

>> the installation of Vista on corporate machines?

>> Let's see if you 5-year-old underdeveloped brain can get past this

>> suggestion: Until you actually see these memos, and have hard evidence

>> to prove your statements, I suggest you keep you your comments to

>> yourself.

>>

>> Or is the concept of providing evidence too much to handle?

>>

>>

>

> Um, I only go by the nick "Alias". Just because there are millions of

> Vista users doesn't mean it's a good thing.

 

Nor does it mean it's a bad thing, you moron.

 

Many more people drink sodas

> and smoke cigarettes than there are Windows users but those numbers do

> not indicate that sodas and cigarettes are good for you.

 

Nor is lying, like you constantly do, a good thing.

Frank

>

Perhaps I should clarify.

Many organizations are "PROHIBITING" (perhaps a strong word with

"waiting" more appropriate) installation until their IT departments

have determined their essential hardware and software will function

with the new operating system.

This can take quite some time for some since often the software and

even some hardware may be proprietary.

 

Waiting for these and other reasons is normal and expected.

This happened at the release of Windows XP and when any operating

system from any source has a new version used by an organization.

This reflects more on the caution of the organization and less on the

quality of an operating system.

 

--

Jupiter Jones [MVP]

http://www3.telus.net/dandemar

http://www.dts-l.org

 

 

"Jupiter Jones [MVP]" <jones_jupiter@hotnomail.com> wrote in message

news:O5%23Fo$KIIHA.868@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

> "From what I have heard, is that there has been memos on

> multinational insurance companies PROHIBITING..."

>

> Please post the source for this statement.

> Without a source, this can be taken is no more than FUD with only

> you knowing the reasons.

>

> --

> Jupiter Jones [MVP]

> http://www3.telus.net/dandemar

> http://www.dts-l.org

>

>

> "Mang Chai Lyn" <Mango@blubl.ch> wrote in message

> news:47308991$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...> Ask if the computer is

> insured from installing stupid OS's called vista by

>> stupid techs.

>>

>> From what I have heard, is that there has been memos on

>> multinational insurance companies PROHIBITING the techs to install

>> vista in all branches of their corporation... lol

>>

>> Ok sometimes you find a bunch losers doing silly things that defy

>> logic.. and you are no exception

>

"The poster formerly known as 'The Poster" wrote:

> JanJ wrote:

>> "Mang Chai Lyn" wrote:

>>

>>> From what I have heard, is that there has been memos on multinational

>>> insurance companies PROHIBITING the techs to install vista in all branches

>>> of their corporation... lol

>>

>> This is remarkably interesting information! Can you substantiate it, or at

>> least tell us what companies' IT departments have been given such orders?

>

>The one I work at for one...

 

I'm afraid you have to do better than that. As long as these claims are not

backed up by verifiable facts, they carry no weight and must be assumed to be

wrong. For all we know, you can be the sole employee in a business run out of

your own garage.

 

Jan

"Leythos" wrote:

> I setup a BOZO Filter for Adam, Alias and Frank - if their names appear

> in the poster or body I don't see the post, it's the best dang thing

> I've done on Usenet in years. This group now shows about 188 posts over

> a 12-16 hour period instead of 400+, and it's a lot easier to read since

> the chaff is gone.

>

> You might try it too - it's made this group a pleasure to read again.

 

I'm aware of the option, but out of sheer curiosity I have read some of

these threads, and wonder why they all bother. My sincere apologies for

adding more chaff to people's inboxes btw.

 

Jan

Please mr or miss idiot, prove to me vista is good first.

 

 

"JanJ" <JanJ@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message

news:7D8FA101-FD72-4EDD-A1BF-2B8DAC6B75F9@microsoft.com...

>

>

> "The poster formerly known as 'The Poster" wrote:

>

>> JanJ wrote:

>>> "Mang Chai Lyn" wrote:

>>>

>>>> From what I have heard, is that there has been memos on multinational

>>>> insurance companies PROHIBITING the techs to install vista in all

>>>> branches

>>>> of their corporation... lol

>>>

>>> This is remarkably interesting information! Can you substantiate it, or

>>> at

>>> least tell us what companies' IT departments have been given such

>>> orders?

>>

>>The one I work at for one...

>

> I'm afraid you have to do better than that. As long as these claims are

> not

> backed up by verifiable facts, they carry no weight and must be assumed to

> be

> wrong. For all we know, you can be the sole employee in a business run out

> of

> your own garage.

>

> Jan

joel406 <joel406.2zmmg5@no-mx.forums.net> wrote in news:joel406.2zmmg5

@no-mx.forums.net:

> People that have problems with Vista are either.

>

> A. Running outdated hardware that probably had a hard time running XP.

>

> B. Computer illiterates who think computers should run themselves.

 

To address point B....Of course. That is what _everyone_ wants. A PC that

runs smoothly all the time, installs and runs every program with ease,

never suffers a hardware failure, etc. I myself know that that is not

possible.

 

Back in the day, in order to have a PC, you had to know how it worked to

be able to maintain it. You would build them youself from mail order

component house to save 1/2 of the cost of buying a fully built system.

Keyboard were $40 or $50 and RAM back in the 2/386 days was $60/meg. So

you knew how everything worked and was easily fixable. If you had a PC,

you were a geek.

 

With the PC & Internet explosion, all of that changed when Mom & Dad

wanted one, Uncle Bob & Aunt Lucy too. People that didn't have an

technical interest in computers suddenly wanted to use them. They didn't

want to learn to fix them, or install an OS, they just wanted to turn it

on and use it, and have it worked. All the time. Just like your car. You

want your car to work, all the time. You're cell phone, anything.

 

The MS advertising campaign's want to push that image, obviously, and

those people that aren't 'geeks', or into 'the scene' see the 'WOW!'

commercials, and claims of being the best OS ever, much more secure, new

features, a beautiful new UI. I knows lots of people that still haven't

yet owned their own PC.

 

So what will they expect if they by their first PC with pre-installed

Vista, from an OEM that loaded all their crap on it ? They will expect it

to work. They have no experience with owning a PC, maybe they use one at

work, but that might not mean anything more than sending e-mail or typing

Word documents for some people. Work has an IT department.

 

So I guess my point is that you can't fault someone that is not computer

saavy for expecting it to just work, all the time.

Jerry Atricks wrote:

> "Alias" <iamalias@gmailshoes.com> wrote in message

> news:fgqgm0$3g1$2@aioe.org...

>> Frank wrote:

>>> Mang Chai Lyn wrote:

>>>

>>> ---idiot remarks from our resident moron removed----

>>>

>>> Read'em and weep you idiot!

>>>

>>> http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=785

>>>

>>> Frank

>> Numbers mean nothing. More people smoke cigarettes than there are Windows

>> users but that doesn't mean cigarettes are good for you.

>>

>

> Yea, don't worry about the SMALL Linux/Ubuntu numbers. Ubuntu still ISN'T

> good for you !!!!

>

 

Heaven forbid one would have an OS without WPA and WGA. Heaven forbid

one would have an OS that isn't nearly as virus or malware prone as

Windows. Heaven forbid ...

 

--

Alias

 

To email me, remove shoes

Jerry Atricks wrote:

> "Alias" <iamalias@gmailshoes.com> wrote in message

> news:fgqfkq$t4$2@aioe.org...

>> Frank wrote:

>>> Mang Chai Lyn wrote:

>>>

>>>

>>> ----jackass remarks from our resident brain dead moron deleted---

>>>

>>> Get a life you idiot!

>>>

>>> Read'em and weep loser.

>>>

>>> http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=785

>>>

>>> Frank

>> More people drink Pepsi and Coke than there are Vista Virus users (or

>> Windows for that matter). The fact that billions of people drink Pepsi and

>> Coke doesn't mean they are good for you.

>

> The fact that you tell everyone about Ubuntu doesn't mean it's good for you.

> It isn't. Stay away. Far away from Linux/Ubuntu.

 

Why, pray tell, is Ubuntu bad for you? This should be good.

 

--

Alias

 

To email me, remove shoes

Frank wrote:

> Alias wrote:

>

>> Frank wrote:

>>

>>> Mang Chai Lyn wrote:

>>>

>>>

>>> ----jackass remarks from our resident brain dead moron deleted---

>>>

>>> Get a life you idiot!

>>>

>>> Read'em and weep loser.

>>>

>>> http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=785

>>>

>>> Frank

>>

>>

>> More people drink Pepsi and Coke than there are Vista Virus users (or

>> Windows for that matter). The fact that billions of people drink Pepsi

>> and Coke doesn't mean they are good for you.

>>

>

> Lying, like you do constantly, is also not a good thing, but you

> continue doing it.

> Frank

 

Once again Frankie boy cannot address the issues raised so he trots out

a phony straw man in a lame attempt to cover up his inadequacies.

 

--

Alias

 

To email me, remove shoes

Frank wrote:

> Alias wrote:

>

>> dzomlija wrote:

>>

>>> Mang Chai Lyn505329 Wrote:

>>>

>>>> From what I have heard, is that there has been memos on multinational

>>>> insurance companies PROHIBITING the techs to install vista in all

>>>> branches of their corporation... lol

>>>>

>>>> Ok sometimes you find a bunch losers doing silly things that defy

>>>> logic..

>>>> and you are no exception

>>>

>>>

>>> From what you have -heard-? "Mang Chai Lyn" (Or should that be "Tie

>>> Various" or "Alias"?), you say that you have heard of memos prohibiting

>>> the installation of Vista on corporate machines?

>>> Let's see if you 5-year-old underdeveloped brain can get past this

>>> suggestion: Until you actually see these memos, and have hard evidence

>>> to prove your statements, I suggest you keep you your comments to

>>> yourself.

>>>

>>> Or is the concept of providing evidence too much to handle?

>>>

>>>

>>

>> Um, I only go by the nick "Alias". Just because there are millions of

>> Vista users doesn't mean it's a good thing.

>

> Nor does it mean it's a bad thing, you moron.

 

Only morons like you don't know it's a bad thing.

>

> Many more people drink sodas

>> and smoke cigarettes than there are Windows users but those numbers do

>> not indicate that sodas and cigarettes are good for you.

>

> Nor is lying, like you constantly do, a good thing.

> Frank

 

I don't lie. You do. All the time.

 

--

Alias

 

To email me, remove shoes