Re: Open Source Developers Shun Micoshaft Corporation

 

Adam Albright wrote:

> On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 18:57:38 +0100, "dennis@home"

> <dennis@killspam.kicks-ass.net> wrote:

>

>

>> Another one that doesn't like the truth.

>

> The truth is you're just another self-important, loud, uncouth windbag

> that has some odd need to try to defend questionable Microsoft

> practices. I should thank you, because you and about a half a dozen

> other airheads make me and I'm guessing many others laugh every day

> over the idiotic things you keep saying.

>

 

<You're just self-important garbage that think you are God's gift to the

world, but all you really are is street garbage that needs to be pick-up

and taken to the city dump.>

Re: Open Source Developers Shun Micoshaft Corporation

 

"chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message

news:c7iqf35fsmtg27jcnsh81m7m241e6cb2kg@4ax.com...

> dennis@home wrote:

>

>>"chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:

>>>

>>> You are a fscking idiot. If you're so paranoid, get your LiveCD ISO

>>> from directly from the ubuntu (or whatever) Web site. Sheesh.

>>

>>Another one that doesn't like the truth.

>

> The truth is, you're an idiot.

>

>>There is *nothing* in Linux (or most OSes) to protect a user from such a

>>simple attack

>

> Idiot. Read my last post again.

>

 

The only thing in your post are insults so it appears you know nothing! and

you call me an idiot.

Re: Open Source Developers Shun Micoshaft Corporation

 

dennis@home wrote:

>"chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message

>>

>> dennis@home wrote:

>>

>>>"chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:

>>>>

>>>> You are a fscking idiot. If you're so paranoid, get your LiveCD ISO

>>>> from directly from the ubuntu (or whatever) Web site. Sheesh.

>>>

>>>Another one that doesn't like the truth.

>>

>> The truth is, you're an idiot.

>>

>>>There is *nothing* in Linux (or most OSes) to protect a user from such a

>>>simple attack

>>

>> Idiot. Read my last post again.

>

>The only thing in your post are insults

 

Incorrect. I also explained *why* I'm calling you an idiot.

>so it appears you know nothing!

 

Wrong again, obviously.

>and you call me an idiot.

 

Yes, I do, because you are.

Re: Open Source Developers Shun Micoshaft Corporation

 

Asstroturfer dennis@home wrote on behalf of Micoshaft Corporation:

>

> "7" <website_has_email@www.enemygadgets.com> wrote in message

> news:dOVKi.21730$c_1.2486@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...

>> Asstroturfer dennis@home wrote on behalf of Micoshaft Corporation:

>>

>>>

>>> "7" <website_has_email@www.enemygadgets.com> wrote in message

>>> news:4lUKi.21642$c_1.10147@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>> See the advanced technology in action here

>>>> http://www.livecdlist.com

>>>> Just download and boot from CD.

>>>

>>> You must be joking.. nobody in their right mind would download a self

>>> booting CD recommended by anyone they didn't know.

>>> It could do absolutely anything to the machine you boot it on.

>>> Its just the sort of thing a hacker would try to get you to do.

>>> It would be a damn good way to root Linux boxes BTW.

>>

>> 100% wrong!!!

>

> You shouldn't be so certain, the Internet is full of nasty clever people

> that will eat you for breakfast.

>

>> Linux distributions come with source code.

>> If you don't trust a distro, you can make it yourself

>> with the original source code.

>>

>> Begs the question which corporation is gonna trust a micoshaft CD that

>> has no accompanying source code?

>> Micoshaft recommend their install CDs which are self booting

>> and you have no access to their source code to know

>> whats in a Micoshaft CD!!!

>>

>> All Linux CDs come *WITH* source code so that you can be sure

>> that no viruses or other crap spyware and adware has been put into it.

>

> Rubbish.

> They don't all come with source, and you will find it hard to compile it

> and make your own.

 

Fine all you have to do now is prove it by naming one.

That will be the *first ever* GPL'd Linux distro without source code.

 

> You have no way to actually know a live CD is safe unless you know where

> it came from and you know they can be trusted.

 

Well, ok. All you now have to do now is prove it!

Simply download the source code, modify it and send it back to the

Linux distro maintainers, explaining what your code does,

and I'm sure they will jump to it and incorporate it in their next release.

 

WAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA!!!!

 

 

 

 

Don't give up your day job just yet fool!

The Open Source world is whole lot smarter than you think once

you get to know how it works.

http://www.livecdlist.com

http://www.distrowatch.com

 

>> That is a fundmantal distinction between open source Linux

>> and closed source untrustworthy Micoshaft sponsored products.

>

> You are letting irrational hate get in the way of logic.

> You would make an ideal target for a hacker.

Re: Open Source Developers Shun Micoshaft Corporation

 

>

> HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA!!!!

>

>

 

<Well, here we go with 7.>

 

.

Re: Open Source Developers Shun Micoshaft Corporation

 

dennis@home wrote:

> you call me an idiot.

 

Something about the suitability of foot apparel comes to mind...

Re: Open Source Developers Shun Micoshaft Corporation

 

dennis@home wrote:

> There is *nothing* in Linux (or most OSes) to protect a user from such a

> simple attack and yet you think I am paranoid for not listening to some

> troll posting download web sites in a news group. Do get a clue on what is

> and isn't safe with the computer you are supposed to be in charge of.

 

Your state of clue-free is astounding. There's scores of ways to defeat

evil package distributors from dolling out bogus packages.

 

Micro$oft only uses the most fragile of them, if it uses any at all.

 

Linux uses the strongest whenever and wherever possible.

 

FREE CLUE: the GnuPG keyring maintained by package managers.

 

Take as long as you want to think it over. No time limit.

Re: Open Source Developers Shun Micoshaft Corporation

 

Anonymous wrote:

> dennis@home wrote:

>

>

>>There is *nothing* in Linux (or most OSes) to protect a user from such a

>>simple attack and yet you think I am paranoid for not listening to some

>>troll posting download web sites in a news group. Do get a clue on what is

>>and isn't safe with the computer you are supposed to be in charge of.

>

>

> Your state of clue-free is astounding. There's scores of ways to defeat

> evil package distributors from dolling out bogus packages.

>

> Micro$oft only uses the most fragile of them, if it uses any at all.

>

> Linux uses the strongest whenever and wherever possible.

>

> FREE CLUE: the GnuPG keyring maintained by package managers.

>

> Take as long as you want to think it over. No time limit.

>

Hey you...butt-munch...get lost.

Read the sign...it says Vista...not open sores ...or loser linux...just

Vista.

Frank

Re: Open Source Developers Shun Micoshaft Corporation

 

Frank wrote:

> Anonymous wrote:

>

>> dennis@home wrote:

>>

>>

>>>There is *nothing* in Linux (or most OSes) to protect a user from such a

>>>simple attack and yet you think I am paranoid for not listening to some

>>>troll posting download web sites in a news group. Do get a clue on what

>>>is and isn't safe with the computer you are supposed to be in charge of.

>>

>>

>> Your state of clue-free is astounding. There's scores of ways to defeat

>> evil package distributors from dolling out bogus packages.

>>

>> Micro$oft only uses the most fragile of them, if it uses any at all.

>>

>> Linux uses the strongest whenever and wherever possible.

>>

>> FREE CLUE: the GnuPG keyring maintained by package managers.

>>

>> Take as long as you want to think it over. No time limit.

>>

> Hey you...butt-munch...get lost.

> Read the sign...it says Vista...not open sores ...or loser linux...just

> Vista.

> Frank

 

Idiot

--

Only two things are infinite,

the Universe and Stupidity.

And I'm not quite sure about the former.

- Albert Einstein

Re: Open Source Developers Shun Micoshaft Corporation

 

"7" <website_has_email@www.enemygadgets.com> wrote in message

news:9EdLi.22294$c_1.8262@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...

> Asstroturfer dennis@home wrote on behalf of Micoshaft Corporation:

>

>>

>> "7" <website_has_email@www.enemygadgets.com> wrote in message

>> news:dOVKi.21730$c_1.2486@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...

>>> Asstroturfer dennis@home wrote on behalf of Micoshaft Corporation:

>>>

>>>>

>>>> "7" <website_has_email@www.enemygadgets.com> wrote in message

>>>> news:4lUKi.21642$c_1.10147@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>> See the advanced technology in action here

>>>>> http://www.livecdlist.com

>>>>> Just download and boot from CD.

>>>>

>>>> You must be joking.. nobody in their right mind would download a self

>>>> booting CD recommended by anyone they didn't know.

>>>> It could do absolutely anything to the machine you boot it on.

>>>> Its just the sort of thing a hacker would try to get you to do.

>>>> It would be a damn good way to root Linux boxes BTW.

>>>

>>> 100% wrong!!!

>>

>> You shouldn't be so certain, the Internet is full of nasty clever people

>> that will eat you for breakfast.

>>

>>> Linux distributions come with source code.

>>> If you don't trust a distro, you can make it yourself

>>> with the original source code.

>>>

>>> Begs the question which corporation is gonna trust a micoshaft CD that

>>> has no accompanying source code?

>>> Micoshaft recommend their install CDs which are self booting

>>> and you have no access to their source code to know

>>> whats in a Micoshaft CD!!!

>>>

>>> All Linux CDs come *WITH* source code so that you can be sure

>>> that no viruses or other crap spyware and adware has been put into it.

>>

>> Rubbish.

>> They don't all come with source, and you will find it hard to compile it

>> and make your own.

>

> Fine all you have to do now is prove it by naming one.

 

That is easy.

Ubuntu doesn't.

You have to go and find it if you want it.

> That will be the *first ever* GPL'd Linux distro without source code.

 

That would be true but that isn't what was said so we can draw a line here.

>

>

>> You have no way to actually know a live CD is safe unless you know where

>> it came from and you know they can be trusted.

>

> Well, ok. All you now have to do now is prove it!

> Simply download the source code, modify it and send it back to the

> Linux distro maintainers, explaining what your code does,

> and I'm sure they will jump to it and incorporate it in their next

> release.

>

> WAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA!!!!

>

 

You are an idiot as that is not the mechanism involved.

Its a hack aimed at people that are idiots like you.

Read what I post carefully and you will see that it is a variant on one of

the oldes hacks in existence and you still don't understand it.

> Don't give up your day job just yet fool!

> The Open Source world is whole lot smarter than you think

 

Its not if its full of people like you that haven't even worked out what

this is about yet!

 

Its not about the Linuses of the world that write code for the good of the

people its about the nasty little ba$%^&*d that want to control your

machine.

All they have to do is create a "Ubuntu" distro image and put it somewhere

others will download.

Then post a few "here it is its very good and you can get it fast here"

messages into usenet and idiots like you that don't understand what you are

talking about are going to download it and get infected and there is no way

they will ever know. Like wise it could infect a windows machine if you boot

it.. it doesn't make much difference what the target is if you boot it.

> once

> you get to know how it works.

> http://www.livecdlist.com

> http://www.distrowatch.com

 

Once you work out that that is irrelevant you might understand that you are

wrong.

>>> That is a fundmantal distinction between open source Linux

>>> and closed source untrustworthy Micoshaft sponsored products.

>>

>> You are letting irrational hate get in the way of logic.

>> You would make an ideal target for a hacker.

>

Re: Open Source Developers Shun Micoshaft Corporation

 

"Anonymous" <cripto@ecn.org> wrote in message

news:a74ba05b9abd63f5f9afc787b8be985c@ecn.org...

> dennis@home wrote:

>

>> There is *nothing* in Linux (or most OSes) to protect a user from such a

>> simple attack and yet you think I am paranoid for not listening to some

>> troll posting download web sites in a news group. Do get a clue on what

>> is

>> and isn't safe with the computer you are supposed to be in charge of.

>

> Your state of clue-free is astounding. There's scores of ways to defeat

> evil package distributors from dolling out bogus packages.

 

Name one way to defeat a rogue live CD put out on the Internet *other* than

what I said about not downloading it just because someone shouts about it in

a news group? There are no mechanisms to stop it in any distro and whats

more there can't be by definition. Anyone that can write the code can do it

and there is nothing you or anyone else can do to stop it without censoring

the internet and even that is not 100% certain.

 

>

> Micro$oft only uses the most fragile of them, if it uses any at all.

>

> Linux uses the strongest whenever and wherever possible.

>

> FREE CLUE: the GnuPG keyring maintained by package managers.

 

FREE CLUE: Its doesn't make any difference.. they never see the stuff so why

would it?

>

> Take as long as you want to think it over. No time limit.

 

You can take your time to answer the above.

I don't expect you too BTW.

>

Re: Open Source Developers Shun Micoshaft Corporation

 

dennis@home wrote:

>

> "Anonymous" <cripto@ecn.org> wrote in message

> news:a74ba05b9abd63f5f9afc787b8be985c@ecn.org...

>> dennis@home wrote:

>>

>>> There is *nothing* in Linux (or most OSes) to protect a user from such a

>>> simple attack and yet you think I am paranoid for not listening to some

>>> troll posting download web sites in a news group. Do get a clue on what

>>> is

>>> and isn't safe with the computer you are supposed to be in charge of.

>>

>> Your state of clue-free is astounding. There's scores of ways to defeat

>> evil package distributors from dolling out bogus packages.

>

> Name one way to defeat a rogue live CD put out on the Internet *other*

> than what I said about not downloading it just because someone shouts

> about it in a news group?

 

So you are actually dumb enough to download a liveCD from a bogus site, not

the official one? You are too stupid to check the MD5 sum against the

published ones?

 

It figures. You are quite certainly a windows user

> There are no mechanisms to stop it in any distro

> and whats more there can't be by definition. Anyone that can write the

> code can do it and there is nothing you or anyone else can do to stop it

> without censoring the internet and even that is not 100% certain.

 

You are really an idiot. You know nothing at all about the subject at hand.

 

Anyone could write such code and pack it into a distro, right.

 

Free clue: That does nothing to propagate that one. How do you propose to

distrubute it?

 

Before you can somewhat intelligently answer *that* question, you can stop

rigth here with your scenario. It will not work

 

--

Support your local Search and Rescue unit -- get lost.

Re: Open Source Developers Shun Micoshaft Corporation

 

Asstroturfer dennis@home wrote on behalf of Micoshaft Corporation:

>

> "7" <website_has_email@www.enemygadgets.com> wrote in message

> news:9EdLi.22294$c_1.8262@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...

>> Asstroturfer dennis@home wrote on behalf of Micoshaft Corporation:

>>

>>>

>>> "7" <website_has_email@www.enemygadgets.com> wrote in message

>>> news:dOVKi.21730$c_1.2486@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...

>>>> Asstroturfer dennis@home wrote on behalf of Micoshaft Corporation:

>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> "7" <website_has_email@www.enemygadgets.com> wrote in message

>>>>> news:4lUKi.21642$c_1.10147@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>> See the advanced technology in action here

>>>>>> http://www.livecdlist.com

>>>>>> Just download and boot from CD.

>>>>>

>>>>> You must be joking.. nobody in their right mind would download a self

>>>>> booting CD recommended by anyone they didn't know.

>>>>> It could do absolutely anything to the machine you boot it on.

>>>>> Its just the sort of thing a hacker would try to get you to do.

>>>>> It would be a damn good way to root Linux boxes BTW.

>>>>

>>>> 100% wrong!!!

>>>

>>> You shouldn't be so certain, the Internet is full of nasty clever people

>>> that will eat you for breakfast.

>>>

>>>> Linux distributions come with source code.

>>>> If you don't trust a distro, you can make it yourself

>>>> with the original source code.

>>>>

>>>> Begs the question which corporation is gonna trust a micoshaft CD that

>>>> has no accompanying source code?

>>>> Micoshaft recommend their install CDs which are self booting

>>>> and you have no access to their source code to know

>>>> whats in a Micoshaft CD!!!

>>>>

>>>> All Linux CDs come *WITH* source code so that you can be sure

>>>> that no viruses or other crap spyware and adware has been put into it.

>>>

>>> Rubbish.

>>> They don't all come with source, and you will find it hard to compile it

>>> and make your own.

>>

>> Fine all you have to do now is prove it by naming one.

>

> That is easy.

> Ubuntu doesn't.

 

YOU ARE 100% LIAR!!!!

> You have to go and find it if you want it.

 

Which means you are a LIAR!!!

You can download it all from their repository you *STUPID FSCK*!

 

>> That will be the *first ever* GPL'd Linux distro without source code.

>

> That would be true but that isn't what was said so we can draw a line

> here.

 

You are a STUPID FSCK!

>>

>>> You have no way to actually know a live CD is safe unless you know where

>>> it came from and you know they can be trusted.

>>

>> Well, ok. All you now have to do now is prove it!

>> Simply download the source code, modify it and send it back to the

>> Linux distro maintainers, explaining what your code does,

>> and I'm sure they will jump to it and incorporate it in their next

>> release.

>>

>> WAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA!!!!

>>

>

> You are an idiot as that is not the mechanism involved.

> Its a hack aimed at people that are idiots like you.

> Read what I post carefully and you will see that it is a variant on one of

> the oldes hacks in existence and you still don't understand it.

 

You are a STUPID UNEMPLOYABLE WINDUMMY FSCK!

All you have to do is prove you are not by simply downloading

source code from http://www.ubuntu.com,

writing your hack, and then subit your source code

to Ubuntu to get Ubuntu to distribute

your modifications for you. Go and do it now fool!!!

The world + dog is watching and waiting!!!!

 

>> Don't give up your day job just yet fool!

>> The Open Source world is whole lot smarter than you think

>

> Its not if its full of people like you that haven't even worked out what

> this is about yet!

>

> Its not about the Linuses of the world that write code for the good of the

> people its about the nasty little ba$%^&*d that want to control your

> machine.

> All they have to do is create a "Ubuntu" distro image and put it somewhere

> others will download.

> Then post a few "here it is its very good and you can get it fast here"

> messages into usenet and idiots like you that don't understand what you

> are talking about are going to download it and get infected and there is

> no way they will ever know. Like wise it could infect a windows machine if

> you boot it.. it doesn't make much difference what the target is if you

> boot it.

>

>> once

>> you get to know how it works.

>> http://www.livecdlist.com

>> http://www.distrowatch.com

>

> Once you work out that that is irrelevant you might understand that you

> are wrong.

>

>>>> That is a fundmantal distinction between open source Linux

>>>> and closed source untrustworthy Micoshaft sponsored products.

>>>

>>> You are letting irrational hate get in the way of logic.

>>> You would make an ideal target for a hacker.

>>

Re: Open Source Developers Shun Micoshaft Corporation

 

"7" <website_has_email@www.enemygadgets.com> wrote in message

news:G3pLi.22525$c_1.16847@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...

 

Now I understand why others call you a cretin.

Bye.

Re: Open Source Developers Shun Micoshaft Corporation

 

dennis@home wrote:

>

> "7" <website_has_email@www.enemygadgets.com> wrote in message

> news:G3pLi.22525$c_1.16847@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...

>

> Now I understand why others call you a cretin.

> Bye.

 

He certainly uses the wrong language.

 

But that does not detract from the fact that he is basically right.

You are one of the dumbest widiots who has posted in cola for quite some

time. Your "knowledge" about linux is so incredibly missing that you can't

get even simple things right.

That does not hinder you in posting your FUD, though. And this for sure

makes *you* the cretin.

But then, you are a typical windows user. And those tend to be stupid beyond

imagination

--

Warning: You have moved the mouse.

Windows will reboot now to make the change permanent

Re: Open Source Developers Shun Micoshaft Corporation

 

Frank wrote:

> Anonymous wrote:

>

>> dennis@home wrote:

>>

>>

>>> There is *nothing* in Linux (or most OSes) to protect a user from

>>> such a simple attack and yet you think I am paranoid for not

>>> listening to some troll posting download web sites in a news group.

>>> Do get a clue on what is and isn't safe with the computer you are

>>> supposed to be in charge of.

>>

>>

>> Your state of clue-free is astounding. There's scores of ways to defeat

>> evil package distributors from dolling out bogus packages.

>>

>> Micro$oft only uses the most fragile of them, if it uses any at all.

>>

>> Linux uses the strongest whenever and wherever possible.

>>

>> FREE CLUE: the GnuPG keyring maintained by package managers.

>>

>> Take as long as you want to think it over. No time limit.

>>

> Hey you...butt-munch...get lost.

> Read the sign...it says Vista...not open sores ...or loser linux...just

> Vista.

> Frank

 

Um, you are crossposting to COLA and you are too dense to even realize

it. I have to remove COLA because AIOE won't post to it but look at your

headers and see what doors you sent your post to and then apologize. Are

you man enough to admit a mistake?

 

Then, try to refute the post without using personal attacks (you can't).

 

--

Alias

To email me, remove shoes

Re: Open Source Developers Shun Micoshaft Corporation

 

dennis@home wrote:

>

> "Anonymous" <cripto@ecn.org> wrote in message

> news:a74ba05b9abd63f5f9afc787b8be985c@ecn.org...

> > dennis@home wrote:

> >

> >> There is *nothing* in Linux (or most OSes) to protect a user from such a

> >> simple attack and yet you think I am paranoid for not listening to some

> >> troll posting download web sites in a news group. Do get a clue on what

> >> is

> >> and isn't safe with the computer you are supposed to be in charge of.

> >

> > Your state of clue-free is astounding. There's scores of ways to defeat

> > evil package distributors from dolling out bogus packages.

>

> Name one way to defeat a rogue live CD put out on the Internet *other* than

> what I said about not downloading it just because someone shouts about it in

 

I can name a dozen ways in a few different categories ya' ninny.

Hashes, digital signatures, and transport layer certificates signed by

trusted CA's are collectively the methods you're apparently oblivious

to. That's part what those tools are designed to do ferChristsakes.

> a news group? There are no mechanisms to stop it in any distro and whats

> more there can't be by definition. Anyone that can write the code can do it

> and there is nothing you or anyone else can do to stop it without censoring

> the internet and even that is not 100% certain.

>

> > Micro$oft only uses the most fragile of them, if it uses any at all.

> >

> > Linux uses the strongest whenever and wherever possible.

> >

> > FREE CLUE: the GnuPG keyring maintained by package managers.

>

> FREE CLUE: Its doesn't make any difference.. they never see the stuff so why

> would it?

 

What in the *fuck* are you prattling on about? Who never sees what?

> > Take as long as you want to think it over. No time limit.

>

> You can take your time to answer the above.

> I don't expect you too BTW.

 

Sorry to disappoint you kid. :)

Re: Open Source Developers Shun Micoshaft Corporation

 

7 wrote:

> Asstroturfer dennis@home wrote on behalf of Micoshaft Corporation:

>

>> "7" <website_has_email@www.enemygadgets.com> wrote in message

>> news:9EdLi.22294$c_1.8262@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...

>>> Asstroturfer dennis@home wrote on behalf of Micoshaft Corporation:

>>>

>>>> "7" <website_has_email@www.enemygadgets.com> wrote in message

>>>> news:dOVKi.21730$c_1.2486@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...

>>>>> Asstroturfer dennis@home wrote on behalf of Micoshaft Corporation:

>>>>>

>>>>>> "7" <website_has_email@www.enemygadgets.com> wrote in message

>>>>>> news:4lUKi.21642$c_1.10147@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> See the advanced technology in action here

>>>>>>> http://www.livecdlist.com

>>>>>>> Just download and boot from CD.

>>>>>> You must be joking.. nobody in their right mind would download a self

>>>>>> booting CD recommended by anyone they didn't know.

>>>>>> It could do absolutely anything to the machine you boot it on.

>>>>>> Its just the sort of thing a hacker would try to get you to do.

>>>>>> It would be a damn good way to root Linux boxes BTW.

>>>>> 100% wrong!!!

>>>> You shouldn't be so certain, the Internet is full of nasty clever people

>>>> that will eat you for breakfast.

>>>>

>>>>> Linux distributions come with source code.

>>>>> If you don't trust a distro, you can make it yourself

>>>>> with the original source code.

>>>>>

>>>>> Begs the question which corporation is gonna trust a micoshaft CD that

>>>>> has no accompanying source code?

>>>>> Micoshaft recommend their install CDs which are self booting

>>>>> and you have no access to their source code to know

>>>>> whats in a Micoshaft CD!!!

>>>>>

>>>>> All Linux CDs come *WITH* source code so that you can be sure

>>>>> that no viruses or other crap spyware and adware has been put into it.

>>>> Rubbish.

>>>> They don't all come with source, and you will find it hard to compile it

>>>> and make your own.

>>> Fine all you have to do now is prove it by naming one.

>> That is easy.

>> Ubuntu doesn't.

>

> YOU ARE 100% LIAR!!!!

>

>> You have to go and find it if you want it.

>

> Which means you are a LIAR!!!

> You can download it all from their repository you *STUPID FSCK*!

>

>

>>> That will be the *first ever* GPL'd Linux distro without source code.

>> That would be true but that isn't what was said so we can draw a line

>> here.

>

> You are a STUPID FSCK!

>

>>>> You have no way to actually know a live CD is safe unless you know where

>>>> it came from and you know they can be trusted.

>>> Well, ok. All you now have to do now is prove it!

>>> Simply download the source code, modify it and send it back to the

>>> Linux distro maintainers, explaining what your code does,

>>> and I'm sure they will jump to it and incorporate it in their next

>>> release.

>>>

>>> WAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA!!!!

>>>

>> You are an idiot as that is not the mechanism involved.

>> Its a hack aimed at people that are idiots like you.

>> Read what I post carefully and you will see that it is a variant on one of

>> the oldes hacks in existence and you still don't understand it.

>

> You are a STUPID UNEMPLOYABLE WINDUMMY FSCK!

> All you have to do is prove you are not by simply downloading

> source code from http://www.ubuntu.com,

> writing your hack, and then subit your source code

> to Ubuntu to get Ubuntu to distribute

> your modifications for you. Go and do it now fool!!!

> The world + dog is watching and waiting!!!!

>

>

>>> Don't give up your day job just yet fool!

>>> The Open Source world is whole lot smarter than you think

>> Its not if its full of people like you that haven't even worked out what

>> this is about yet!

>>

>> Its not about the Linuses of the world that write code for the good of the

>> people its about the nasty little ba$%^&*d that want to control your

>> machine.

>> All they have to do is create a "Ubuntu" distro image and put it somewhere

>> others will download.

>> Then post a few "here it is its very good and you can get it fast here"

>> messages into usenet and idiots like you that don't understand what you

>> are talking about are going to download it and get infected and there is

>> no way they will ever know. Like wise it could infect a windows machine if

>> you boot it.. it doesn't make much difference what the target is if you

>> boot it.

>>

>>> once

>>> you get to know how it works.

>>> http://www.livecdlist.com

>>> http://www.distrowatch.com

>> Once you work out that that is irrelevant you might understand that you

>> are wrong.

>>

>>>>> That is a fundmantal distinction between open source Linux

>>>>> and closed source untrustworthy Micoshaft sponsored products.

>>>> You are letting irrational hate get in the way of logic.

>>>> You would make an ideal target for a hacker.

>

 

<You have already encountered the loon Albright. He can't shut his pie

hole up. The hag 7 is his wife and a serious nut case too that cannot

stop the dribble with its pie hole either. 7 is by far worst than

Albright, if you let this nut get started. Shut the Linux ho down by not

responding to it.>

Re: Open Source Developers Shun Micoshaft Corporation

 

On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 09:04:39 -0400, Adam GARBAGE AT THE CURB Albright

<YesHeIsGarbage@TheDumpTurckIsComing.net> wrote:

 

>>>>>> That is a fundmantal distinction between open source Linux

>>>>>> and closed source untrustworthy Micoshaft sponsored products.

>>>>> You are letting irrational hate get in the way of logic.

>>>>> You would make an ideal target for a hacker.

>>

>

><You have already encountered the loon Albright. He can't shut his pie

>hole up. The hag 7 is his wife and a serious nut case too that cannot

>stop the dribble with its pie hole either. 7 is by far worst than

>Albright, if you let this nut get started. Shut the Linux ho down by not

>responding to it.>

 

The obvious hate spewing of some Vista loons is obvious in this

newsgroup. They have lost their grip on reality and many need

intensive psychotherapy, like this nut case Adam GARBAGE AT THE CURB

Albright, who changes the name he posts under more often that normal

people change their underwear.

Re: Open Source Developers Shun Micoshaft Corporation

 

Frank wrote:

> 7 wrote:

>> pus.boy99@gmail.com wrote:

>>

>>

>>> On Sep 27, 12:28 pm, "Ms. Polly Ester" . wrote:

>>>

>>>> http://news.yahoo.com/s/cmp/20070927/tc_cmp/202101921_ylt=AiieE0MGKY...

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Fearing the restrictions it places on their work, the majority of open

>>>> source software developers do not plan to publish code in the next year

>>>> under a controversial new license authored by the main governing

>>>> body for

>>>> open source and free software, according to a survey released

>>>> Wednesday.

>>>>

>>>> In addition, more than 40% of those surveyed said they won't ever

>>>> publish

>>>> their work under Version 3 of the General Public License, which was

>>>> released earlier this year by the Free Software Foundation. "GPLv3 is

>>>> controversial because it imposes restrictions on what you can do with

>>>> programs," said John Andrews, CEO of survey taker Evans Data, in a

>>>> statement.

>>>

>>>

>>> More fragmentation to put some more nails in the Linux coffin.

>>> At some point the Linux loons will figure out that all of these spin

>>> offs are not a good thing for Linux.

>>>

>>> With 700+ different versions of Linux and now new GPL3 it's just more

>>> confusion for the suits that make the decisions.

>>> Microsoft makes it easy for those types.

>>> Linux makes it a clusterfsck.

>>

>>

>>

>> There are more Linux clusters that windopws clusters.

>> There are more open source developers than Micoshaft developers.

>> 75% of all new projects are open source.

>> Its time to switch to Linux and be done with.

>> See the advanced technology in action here

>> http://www.livecdlist.com

>> Just download and boot from CD.

>> All your drivers automagically configured.

>> No amount of Pistification of your Pista PC will

>> compare with a Linux PC.

>> http://www.distrowatch.com for more in depth reviews.

>>

>

>

> So that what...just makes linux a bigger pile of crap?

> Frank

 

More reading comprehension problems, eh, Frankie Boy. Vista is just

Windows Me II. Live with it. Oh, I forgot, you DO! LOL!

 

--

Alias

To email me, remove shoes

Re: Open Source Developers Shun Micoshaft Corporation

 

Adam Albright wrote:

> On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 09:04:39 -0400, Adam GARBAGE AT THE CURB Albright

> <YesHeIsGarbage@TheDumpTurckIsComing.net> wrote:

>

>

>>>>>>> That is a fundmantal distinction between open source Linux

>>>>>>> and closed source untrustworthy Micoshaft sponsored products.

>>>>>> You are letting irrational hate get in the way of logic.

>>>>>> You would make an ideal target for a hacker.

>> <You have already encountered the loon Albright. He can't shut his pie

>> hole up. The hag 7 is his wife and a serious nut case too that cannot

>> stop the dribble with its pie hole either. 7 is by far worst than

>> Albright, if you let this nut get started. Shut the Linux ho down by not

>> responding to it.>

>

> The obvious hate spewing of some Vista loons is obvious in this

> newsgroup. They have lost their grip on reality and many need

> intensive psychotherapy, like this nut case Adam GARBAGE AT THE CURB

> Albright, who changes the name he posts under more often that normal

> people change their underwear.

>

 

<I am just checking Albright just checking your status. The devil made

me do it. I might as well get two loons with one stone. You don't get

out of the house at all nor out of the Vista NG period, Albright. I knew

you would respond, and that's why I did it, just to see you jump out of

the water because I knew you were there. You know that 20 out 24 hours

seven days a week thing you have going.

 

<Don't let him fool you, Albright has MS firmly planted up his behind,

and the fool is using Vista. He keeps talking about Linux, but he has no

guts to move to it. BTW, changing the name is in honer of you Albright

just to mess with you. Your name has been there constant in some form.

There is no other reason for it. -) But you're too stupid to realize it.>

Re: Open Source Developers Shun Micoshaft Corporation

 

"Anonymous Sender" <anonymous@remailer.metacolo.com> wrote in message

news:3e4be5540bb30f64dc0e0d781e773f8a@remailer.metacolo.com...

> dennis@home wrote:

>

>>

>> "Anonymous" <cripto@ecn.org> wrote in message

>> news:a74ba05b9abd63f5f9afc787b8be985c@ecn.org...

>> > dennis@home wrote:

>> >

>> >> There is *nothing* in Linux (or most OSes) to protect a user from such

>> >> a

>> >> simple attack and yet you think I am paranoid for not listening to

>> >> some

>> >> troll posting download web sites in a news group. Do get a clue on

>> >> what

>> >> is

>> >> and isn't safe with the computer you are supposed to be in charge of.

>> >

>> > Your state of clue-free is astounding. There's scores of ways to defeat

>> > evil package distributors from dolling out bogus packages.

>>

>> Name one way to defeat a rogue live CD put out on the Internet *other*

>> than

>> what I said about not downloading it just because someone shouts about it

>> in

>

> I can name a dozen ways in a few different categories ya' ninny.

> Hashes, digital signatures, and transport layer certificates signed by

> trusted CA's are collectively the methods you're apparently oblivious

> to. That's part what those tools are designed to do ferChristsakes.

 

How do they stop a begineer (or anyone else) downloading an image from

anywhere, putting it on a CD and booting it ferChristsakes?

There is nothing in a PC to stop it and there would be nothing on the CD to

stop it so you are just dreaming.

 

When you come up with a mechanism that stops someone putting a hacked image

on P2P then maybe I will believe you untill then shut up.

Re: Open Source Developers Shun Micoshaft Corporation

 

dennis@home <dennis@killspam.kicks-ass.net> wrote:

>

> "Anonymous Sender" <anonymous@remailer.metacolo.com> wrote in message

> news:3e4be5540bb30f64dc0e0d781e773f8a@remailer.metacolo.com...

>> dennis@home wrote:

>>

>>>

>>> "Anonymous" <cripto@ecn.org> wrote in message

>>> news:a74ba05b9abd63f5f9afc787b8be985c@ecn.org...

>>> > dennis@home wrote:

>>> >

>>> >> There is *nothing* in Linux (or most OSes) to protect a user from such

>>> >> a

>>> >> simple attack and yet you think I am paranoid for not listening to

>>> >> some

>>> >> troll posting download web sites in a news group. Do get a clue on

>>> >> what

>>> >> is

>>> >> and isn't safe with the computer you are supposed to be in charge of.

>>> >

>>> > Your state of clue-free is astounding. There's scores of ways to defeat

>>> > evil package distributors from dolling out bogus packages.

>>>

>>> Name one way to defeat a rogue live CD put out on the Internet *other*

>>> than

>>> what I said about not downloading it just because someone shouts about it

>>> in

>>

>> I can name a dozen ways in a few different categories ya' ninny.

>> Hashes, digital signatures, and transport layer certificates signed by

>> trusted CA's are collectively the methods you're apparently oblivious

>> to. That's part what those tools are designed to do ferChristsakes.

>

> How do they stop a begineer (or anyone else) downloading an image from

> anywhere, putting it on a CD and booting it ferChristsakes?

> There is nothing in a PC to stop it and there would be nothing on the CD to

> stop it so you are just dreaming.

>

> When you come up with a mechanism that stops someone putting a hacked image

> on P2P then maybe I will believe you untill then shut up.

>

>

 

owl@laptop:~/iso$ cat pclinuxos-2007.md5sum

cf31f44513c9b30caaa1f1d2c382c033 pclinuxos-2007.iso

owl@laptop:~/iso$ md5sum pclinuxos-2007.iso

cf31f44513c9b30caaa1f1d2c382c033 pclinuxos-2007.iso

owl@laptop:~/iso$ md5sum evil_pclinuxos-2007.iso

d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e evil_pclinuxos-2007.iso

owl@laptop:~/iso$

Re: Open Source Developers Shun Micoshaft Corporation

 

owl wrote:

> dennis@home <dennis@killspam.kicks-ass.net> wrote:

>>

>> "Anonymous Sender" <anonymous@remailer.metacolo.com> wrote in message

>> news:3e4be5540bb30f64dc0e0d781e773f8a@remailer.metacolo.com...

>>> dennis@home wrote:

>>>

>>>>

>>>> "Anonymous" <cripto@ecn.org> wrote in message

>>>> news:a74ba05b9abd63f5f9afc787b8be985c@ecn.org...

>>>> > dennis@home wrote:

>>>> >

>>>> >> There is *nothing* in Linux (or most OSes) to protect a user from

>>>> >> such a

>>>> >> simple attack and yet you think I am paranoid for not listening to

>>>> >> some

>>>> >> troll posting download web sites in a news group. Do get a clue on

>>>> >> what

>>>> >> is

>>>> >> and isn't safe with the computer you are supposed to be in charge

>>>> >> of.

>>>> >

>>>> > Your state of clue-free is astounding. There's scores of ways to

>>>> > defeat evil package distributors from dolling out bogus packages.

>>>>

>>>> Name one way to defeat a rogue live CD put out on the Internet *other*

>>>> than

>>>> what I said about not downloading it just because someone shouts about

>>>> it in

>>>

>>> I can name a dozen ways in a few different categories ya' ninny.

>>> Hashes, digital signatures, and transport layer certificates signed by

>>> trusted CA's are collectively the methods you're apparently oblivious

>>> to. That's part what those tools are designed to do ferChristsakes.

>>

>> How do they stop a begineer (or anyone else) downloading an image from

>> anywhere, putting it on a CD and booting it ferChristsakes?

>> There is nothing in a PC to stop it and there would be nothing on the CD

>> to stop it so you are just dreaming.

>>

>> When you come up with a mechanism that stops someone putting a hacked

>> image on P2P then maybe I will believe you untill then shut up.

>>

>>

>

> owl@laptop:~/iso$ cat pclinuxos-2007.md5sum

> cf31f44513c9b30caaa1f1d2c382c033 pclinuxos-2007.iso

> owl@laptop:~/iso$ md5sum pclinuxos-2007.iso

> cf31f44513c9b30caaa1f1d2c382c033 pclinuxos-2007.iso

> owl@laptop:~/iso$ md5sum evil_pclinuxos-2007.iso

> d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e evil_pclinuxos-2007.iso

> owl@laptop:~/iso$

 

Do you really think that "dennis" will get it? I have him told before about

MD5. That retard still claims that people will find "hacked" versions of

liveCDs, download them and run them. Without so much as checking the MD5.

And this naturally in enormous masses. Millions of users I tell you,

*millions*

That it is *far* easier to go to the original sites and get the official

ISOs is beyond that brainless nimwit.

 

He is a typical windows user, that is, not even fit to serve as fertilizer

--

Any idiot can run Vista. And usually does.

Re: Open Source Developers Shun Micoshaft Corporation

 

dennis@home wrote:

>

> "Anonymous Sender" <anonymous@remailer.metacolo.com> wrote in message

> news:3e4be5540bb30f64dc0e0d781e773f8a@remailer.metacolo.com...

> > dennis@home wrote:

> >

> >>

> >> "Anonymous" <cripto@ecn.org> wrote in message

> >> news:a74ba05b9abd63f5f9afc787b8be985c@ecn.org...

> >> > dennis@home wrote:

> >> >

> >> >> There is *nothing* in Linux (or most OSes) to protect a user from such

> >> >> a

> >> >> simple attack and yet you think I am paranoid for not listening to

> >> >> some

> >> >> troll posting download web sites in a news group. Do get a clue on

> >> >> what

> >> >> is

> >> >> and isn't safe with the computer you are supposed to be in charge of.

> >> >

> >> > Your state of clue-free is astounding. There's scores of ways to defeat

> >> > evil package distributors from dolling out bogus packages.

> >>

> >> Name one way to defeat a rogue live CD put out on the Internet *other*

> >> than

> >> what I said about not downloading it just because someone shouts about it

> >> in

> >

> > I can name a dozen ways in a few different categories ya' ninny.

> > Hashes, digital signatures, and transport layer certificates signed by

> > trusted CA's are collectively the methods you're apparently oblivious

> > to. That's part what those tools are designed to do ferChristsakes.

>

> How do they stop a begineer (or anyone else) downloading an image from

> anywhere, putting it on a CD and booting it ferChristsakes?

 

Ohhhh... pop ups, dialogs, and sometimes you even get to read <gasp!> a

series of alphanumeric characters and compare them.

 

Tough nut to crack for a windroid, I know.

> There is nothing in a PC to stop it and there would be nothing on the CD to

> stop it so you are just dreaming.

>

> When you come up with a mechanism that stops someone putting a hacked image

> on P2P then maybe I will believe you untill then shut up.

>

>