Guest Jose_Manuel_Jurado Posted December 13, 2022 Posted December 13, 2022 In some situations, customers that are using PowerBI and Direct Query reported performance issues depending how the query has been defined by PowerBI. In this scenarion, I would like to share with you how we fixed this performance issue using Indexed View. For this example, I download a demo database Release Wide World Importers sample database v1.0 · microsoft/sql-server-samples · GitHub and duplicate rows of a table Fact.Sale until having 234.767.360 rows. I choose HyperScale Database tier basically as a medium size database for OLAP. Lesson Learned #1: If you need to know how many rows per table instead of using SELECT COUNT() for performance improvements. SELECT t.NAME AS TableName, s.Name AS SchemaName, max(CASE i.type WHEN 5 THEN si.rowcnt ELSE p.rows END) AS RowCounts, SUM(a.total_pages) * 8 AS TotalSpaceKB, SUM(a.used_pages) * 8 AS UsedSpaceKB, (SUM(a.total_pages) - SUM(a.used_pages)) * 8 AS UnusedSpaceKB FROM sys.tables t INNER JOIN sys.indexes i ON t.OBJECT_ID = i.object_id INNER JOIN sysindexes si ON t.OBJECT_ID = si.id INNER JOIN sys.partitions p ON i.object_id = p.OBJECT_ID AND i.index_id = p.index_id INNER JOIN sys.allocation_units a ON p.partition_id = a.container_id LEFT OUTER JOIN sys.schemas s ON t.schema_id = s.schema_id WHERE t.is_ms_shipped = 0 AND i.OBJECT_ID > 255 GROUP BY t.Name, s.Name ORDER BY t.Name, s.Name Lesson Learned #2: Using Indexed views In this situation, we have a report where we need to obtain per Fiscal Month Label the Total sales including and excluding Tax. Lesson Learned #3: PowerBI generates the following TSQL statement: SELECT TOP (1000001) * FROM ( SELECT [t3].[Fiscal Month Label] AS [c43],SUM([t6].[Total Excluding Tax]) AS [a0],SUM([t6].[Total Including Tax]) AS [a1] FROM (( select [$Table].[sale Key] as [sale Key], [$Table].[City Key] as [City Key], [$Table].[Customer Key] as [Customer Key], [$Table].[bill To Customer Key] as [bill To Customer Key], [$Table].[stock Item Key] as [stock Item Key], [$Table].[invoice Date Key] as [invoice Date Key], [$Table].[Delivery Date Key] as [Delivery Date Key], [$Table].[salesperson Key] as [salesperson Key], [$Table].[WWI Invoice ID] as [WWI Invoice ID], [$Table].[Description] as [Description], [$Table].[Package] as [Package], [$Table].[Quantity] as [Quantity], [$Table].[unit Price] as [unit Price], [$Table].[Tax Rate] as [Tax Rate], [$Table].[Total Excluding Tax] as [Total Excluding Tax], [$Table].[Tax Amount] as [Tax Amount], [$Table].[Profit] as [Profit], [$Table].[Total Including Tax] as [Total Including Tax], [$Table].[Total Dry Items] as [Total Dry Items], [$Table].[Total Chiller Items] as [Total Chiller Items], [$Table].[Lineage Key] as [Lineage Key] from [Fact].[sale] as [$Table] ) AS [t6] INNER JOIN -- Review avoid using Left Join if possible. ( select [$Table].[Date] as [Date], [$Table].[Day Number] as [Day Number], [$Table].[Day] as [Day], [$Table].[Month] as [Month], [$Table].[short Month] as [short Month], [$Table].[Calendar Month Number] as [Calendar Month Number], [$Table].[Calendar Month Label] as [Calendar Month Label], [$Table].[Calendar Year] as [Calendar Year], [$Table].[Calendar Year Label] as [Calendar Year Label], [$Table].[Fiscal Month Number] as [Fiscal Month Number], [$Table].[Fiscal Month Label] as [Fiscal Month Label], [$Table].[Fiscal Year] as [Fiscal Year], [$Table].[Fiscal Year Label] as [Fiscal Year Label], [$Table].[iSO Week Number] as [iSO Week Number] from [Dimension].[Date] as [$Table] ) AS [t3] on ( [t6].[Delivery Date Key] = [t3].[Date] ) ) GROUP BY [t3].[Fiscal Month Label] ) AS [MainTable] WHERE ( NOT( ( [a0] IS NULL ) ) OR NOT( ( [a1] IS NULL ) ) ) Basically, this query joins the table Dimension.Date with Fact.Sale by Delivery Date Key grouping by Fiscal Month Label. In this query Azure SQL Database needs time depending on the data to group this information. Also, I saw that depending how the PowerBI model is (Inner Join or Left Join) could take more time. In this situation, I suggested to use an Indexed View that will materalize the data at the moment that every rows in inserted in the table. Of course, that if you are adding a huge amount of rows everytime, in terms of performance, in the similar way that we drop the indexes, the recomendation will be remove the indexed view, insert all this huge amount of data and recreate it again. CREATE OR ALTER VIEW DameTotalFiscalMonthLabel with schemabinding as SELECT [Fiscal Month Label] ,SUM([Total Including Tax]) AS [a0],SUM([Total Excluding Tax]) AS [a1], COUNT_BIG(*) AS Total from [Fact].[sale] inner join [Dimension].[Date] on [Fact].[sale].[Delivery Date Key] = [Dimension].[Date].[Date] GROUP BY [Fiscal Month Label] CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX DameTotalFiscalMonthLabel_X1 ON DameTotalFiscalMonthLabel([Fiscal Month Label]) CREATE INDEX FactSaleByInvoiceDay_X1 ON Fact.Sale ( [Delivery Date Key] ) Running again the report of PowerBI, Azure SQL will use the indexed views because it covers all the data needed, improving a lot the results of the query in magnitude of seconds. In another hand, in PowerBI you could use this view directly with the information ready for using. Enjoy! Continue reading... Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.