Adam Albright wrote:

> On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 22:13:02 +0100, "Synapse Syndrome"

> <synapse@NOSPAMgomez404.elitemail.org> wrote:

>

>

>>"Frank" <fb@nosspan.clim> wrote in message

>>news:uFeMwQj%23HHA.396@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>>

>>>>So why do you have XP, W2K, and Me still?

>>>

>>>That statement illustrates the fact that you don't have to deal with the

>>>public.

>>>We need to be able to natively open almost any file that comes to us.

>>>

>>

>>Let me get this clear: you keep older computers, running these older

>>operating systems, just so you can open other users' files??

>>

>>ss.

>>

>

> Frank just stuck his foot in his mouth again. He must like the taste.

> Don't worry, he does that dozens of times every week then pretends he

> didn't say what he said or that you didn't understand or some other

> half-ass excuse. Don't expect anything rational from Frank, he's just

> a clueless troll that lives in never never land where he fancies

> himself the ultimate computer user.

>

 

hehehe...you have no idea what I'm talking about do you? So you just

jump right in and make a fool out of yourself (as usual).

Frank

Adam Albright wrote:

> On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 13:40:45 -0700, Frank <fb@nosspan.clim> wrote:

>

>

>>Terry R. wrote:

>

>

>>>>>You have been "touting" Vista since your post of "All Vista all the

>>>>>time". Are you now going to say you haven't been?

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>Haven't been what? Using Vista? Of course we use Vista and I

>>>>personally use Vista.

>>>>It works just fine for the biz and for my personal use.

>>>

>>>

>>>So why do you have XP, W2K, and Me still?

>>

>>That statement illustrates the fact that you don't have to deal with the

>>public.

>>We need to be able to natively open almost any file that comes to us.

>

>

> For that mythical "business" of yours you said you run from your

> kitchen table. I think Frank is really a sixty year old paper boy that

> delivers newspapers from his motorized wheelchair.

>

>>>>>Well, Moz 1.7.13 is far from "the best tool for the job at hand".

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>It's my personal choice for a news reader and I'll decide what the

>>>>best tool is for my own personal use.

>>>>Frank

>>>>

>>>

>>>Fine. Just don't call it "the best tool for the job at hand".

>>

>>For my personal use it is.

>>

>> Are you

>>

>>>afraid of newer technology? -)

>>

>>Far from it pal...far from it!

>>Frank

>

>

> Frankie is afraid to look in the mirror. Hell, I don't blame him.

>

 

Sh*t! You're must be drunk again!

frank

It is related to XP since the OP included the fact of people removing vista

and installing XP

 

Its good news to XP users so that they will know they are using the best MS

OS, and that vista is to be avoided.

 

 

"Terry R." <F1ComNOSPAM@pobox.com> wrote in message

news:O0PiIFj%23HHA.1208@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

> On 9/18/2007 11:02 AM On a whim, Frank pounded out on the keyboard

>

>> Alias wrote:

>>

>>

>>> I didn't notice that you're using NT 6.0. The question is why you're

>>> using an Open Source application, be it T-Bird, Mozilla Mail or

>>> Seamonkey when you have thrown so many insults at Open Source. Why

>>> aren't you using Vista's Windows Mail?

>>>

>>

>>

>> Cause I don't want to.

>> I guess that blows your theory about me all to hell, huh?

>> Too bad.

>> Live with it.

>> Frank

>>

>> BTW, linux sux!

>

> Will you please take a moment and stop cross-posting to windowsxp.general.

> This has nothing to do with XP.

>

>

> --

> Terry R.

>

> ***Reply Note***

> Anti-spam measures are included in my email address.

> Delete NOSPAM from the email address after clicking Reply.

Frank wrote:

> Alias wrote:

>

>

>>>

>>

>> I didn't notice that you're using NT 6.0. The question is why you're

>> using an Open Source application, be it T-Bird, Mozilla Mail or

>> Seamonkey when you have thrown so many insults at Open Source. Why

>> aren't you using Vista's Windows Mail?

>>

>

>

> Cause I don't want to.

> I guess that blows your theory about me all to hell, huh?

> Too bad.

> Live with it.

> Frank

>

> BTW, linux sux!

 

Oh, so you only refer to Open Source as "Open Sores" when you don't use

it. Now I understand.

 

--

Alias

To email me, remove shoes

On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:14:39 -0700, Frank <fb@nosspan.clim> wrote:

>Synapse Syndrome wrote:

>> "Frank" <fb@nosspan.clim> wrote in message

>> news:uFeMwQj%23HHA.396@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>>

>>>>So why do you have XP, W2K, and Me still?

>>>

>>>That statement illustrates the fact that you don't have to deal with the

>>>public.

>>>We need to be able to natively open almost any file that comes to us.

>>>

>>

>>

>> Let me get this clear: you keep older computers, running these older

>> operating systems, just so you can open other users' files??

>>

>> ss.

>>

>>

>Exactly! If someone bring us for example and old MS Publisher file, say

>v2, we have that version loaded on ME. So we can view the file as original.

>Simple huh?

>Frank

 

It actually illustrate your level of intelligence. LOW.

On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:15:47 -0700, Frank <fb@nosspan.clim> wrote:

>Adam Albright wrote:

>

>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 22:13:02 +0100, "Synapse Syndrome"

>> <synapse@NOSPAMgomez404.elitemail.org> wrote:

>>

>>

>>>"Frank" <fb@nosspan.clim> wrote in message

>>>news:uFeMwQj%23HHA.396@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>>>

>>>>>So why do you have XP, W2K, and Me still?

>>>>

>>>>That statement illustrates the fact that you don't have to deal with the

>>>>public.

>>>>We need to be able to natively open almost any file that comes to us.

>>>>

>>>

>>>Let me get this clear: you keep older computers, running these older

>>>operating systems, just so you can open other users' files??

>>>

>>>ss.

>>>

>>

>> Frank just stuck his foot in his mouth again. He must like the taste.

>> Don't worry, he does that dozens of times every week then pretends he

>> didn't say what he said or that you didn't understand or some other

>> half-ass excuse. Don't expect anything rational from Frank, he's just

>> a clueless troll that lives in never never land where he fancies

>> himself the ultimate computer user.

>>

>

>hehehe...you have no idea what I'm talking about do you? So you just

>jump right in and make a fool out of yourself (as usual).

>Frank

 

I had you pegged as an clueless idiot that loves to run his mouth

after just reading a few of your moronic posts months ago when I first

started following this group.

Adam Albright wrote:

> On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:15:47 -0700, Frank <fb@nosspan.clim> wrote:

>

>

>>Adam Albright wrote:

>>

>>

>>>On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 22:13:02 +0100, "Synapse Syndrome"

>>><synapse@NOSPAMgomez404.elitemail.org> wrote:

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>>"Frank" <fb@nosspan.clim> wrote in message

>>>>news:uFeMwQj%23HHA.396@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>>>So why do you have XP, W2K, and Me still?

>>>>>

>>>>>That statement illustrates the fact that you don't have to deal with the

>>>>>public.

>>>>>We need to be able to natively open almost any file that comes to us.

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>>Let me get this clear: you keep older computers, running these older

>>>>operating systems, just so you can open other users' files??

>>>>

>>>>ss.

>>>>

>>>

>>>Frank just stuck his foot in his mouth again. He must like the taste.

>>>Don't worry, he does that dozens of times every week then pretends he

>>>didn't say what he said or that you didn't understand or some other

>>>half-ass excuse. Don't expect anything rational from Frank, he's just

>>>a clueless troll that lives in never never land where he fancies

>>>himself the ultimate computer user.

>>>

>>

>>hehehe...you have no idea what I'm talking about do you? So you just

>>jump right in and make a fool out of yourself (as usual).

>>Frank

>

>

> I had you pegged as an clueless idiot that loves to run his mouth

> after just reading a few of your moronic posts months ago when I first

> started following this group.

>

 

You just "pegged" your foot into your stupid big mouth you ignorant PUTZ!

Frank

Adam Albright wrote:

> On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:14:39 -0700, Frank <fb@nosspan.clim> wrote:

>

>

>>Synapse Syndrome wrote:

>>

>>>"Frank" <fb@nosspan.clim> wrote in message

>>>news:uFeMwQj%23HHA.396@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>>>

>>>

>>>>>So why do you have XP, W2K, and Me still?

>>>>

>>>>That statement illustrates the fact that you don't have to deal with the

>>>>public.

>>>>We need to be able to natively open almost any file that comes to us.

>>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>Let me get this clear: you keep older computers, running these older

>>>operating systems, just so you can open other users' files??

>>>

>>>ss.

>>>

>>>

>>

>>Exactly! If someone bring us for example and old MS Publisher file, say

>>v2, we have that version loaded on ME. So we can view the file as original.

>>Simple huh?

>>Frank

>

>

> It actually illustrate your level of intelligence. LOW.

>

 

hehehe...you have absolutely no idea what we're talking about do you?

I'll tell you one thing though, lately you're doing stupid really

well...lol!

Frank

Alias wrote:

> Frank wrote:

>

>> Alias wrote:

>>

>>

>>>>

>>>

>>> I didn't notice that you're using NT 6.0. The question is why you're

>>> using an Open Source application, be it T-Bird, Mozilla Mail or

>>> Seamonkey when you have thrown so many insults at Open Source. Why

>>> aren't you using Vista's Windows Mail?

>>>

>>

>>

>> Cause I don't want to.

>> I guess that blows your theory about me all to hell, huh?

>> Too bad.

>> Live with it.

>> Frank

>>

>> BTW, linux sux!

>

>

> Oh, so you only refer to Open Source as "Open Sores" when you don't use

> it. Now I understand.

>

 

You're really reaching now aren't you?

Linux sux (in my opinion) and I don't give a sh*t about your fanatical

devotion to anything open sores. That is your problem, not mine.

It's only software you moron.

I use what I want, when and how I want. If you have a problem with

that...too bad!

Frank

"I eat vista" <Ieatvista@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:46efa6d4@newsgate.x-privat.org...

> Mick the big ones cannot go out and say such things.. MS has them by the

> balls..

>

Too bad you don't have any balls. The guy that I was speaking with says you

only have peas in their place. Oh yea, he said your member is about 3"

shorter than a 3 1/2 inch floppy disk!

 

Just FYI.

 

> only small "free" companies could speak out.. But this is an indication of

> what is happening.. I have seen it everywhere. It is true...

>

> people just don't like vista.. sorry to disappoint you.

>

>

> "Mick Murphy" <MickMurphy@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message

> news:46D0AF40-FFA0-40B6-8573-F21AE590CF4F@microsoft.com...

>> They are definitely one of the BIG, BIG OEM computer producers, aren't

>> they?

>>

>> Hahahahahahaha!

>>

>> "I eat vista" wrote:

>>

>>> Shall we say that the truth is finally shining?

>>> Shall we say "I was telling you so"?

>>> Shall we say that I was explaining to the fanboys that everyones Vista

>>> out

>>> and XP in?

>>> Keep reading!

>>>

>>> http://crn.com/digital-home/201805832?cid=microsoftFeed

>>>

>>> By Steven Burke, CMP Channel

>>> 12:00 AM EDT Mon. Sep. 17, 2007

>>> From the September 17, 2007 issue of CRN

>>>

>>> Digital home integrators say Microsoft's Windows Vista operating system

>>> has

>>> been a big fat bust in the home market.

>>> That bleak Vista view, however, has translated into healthy profits for

>>> home

>>> integrators ripping Vista off systems and replacing the much-ballyhooed

>>> operating system with Windows XP.

>>> Microsoft, for its part, claims demand is strong for Vista and its

>>> momentum

>>> is unprecedented. But digital home integrators at the D&H Distributing

>>> New

>>> England Technology Show last month in Quincy, Mass., say they are seeing

>>> a

>>> healthy rip-and-replace business that is winning them over new customers

>>> who

>>> bought systems at retail.

>>> Bunker Herbest, co-owner of Computer Essentials, a Bangor, Maine, system

>>> builder, said out of the 40 systems a month that Computer Essentials is

>>> building, only about five are Vista-based systems.

>>> Herbest said his shop was ripping and replacing Vista with XP on as many

>>> as

>>> 12 systems a month. Computer Essentials, in fact, has been advertising

>>> its

>>> ability to offer Windows XP rather than Vista.

>>> The Vista rip-and-replace service has "definitely been good for

>>> business,"

>>> Herbest said. "What's great is Vista is being pushed everywhere.

>>> Customers

>>> can't find anybody to get rid of it so they come see people like us.

>>> We're

>>> getting a couple of customers a day at least."

>>> Herbest said consumers have been frustrated by the new Vista graphical

>>> user

>>> interface and the pop-up security update requests. "People that used XP

>>> can't find anything," he said. "It takes time to ramp up and learn

>>> Vista."

>>> Douglas Lee, CFO and director of business development at BostonTech

>>> Partners, a Canton, Mass., solution provider, said his shop is building

>>> about 50 systems a month and every one of them is going out with Windows

>>> XP.

>>> The only Vista-related business BostonTech is doing is ripping it off

>>> laptop

>>> systems, Lee said. A lot of time and energy is being spent trying to

>>> replace

>>> Vista, he said. "Microsoft should have provided the option of having XP

>>> on

>>> laptops as opposed to Vista," he said. "There should have been an easier

>>> downgrade method. Microsoft is force-feeding the consumer market like

>>> they

>>> usually do. It's their way or the highway."

>>> Lee said one problem with Vista is the 64-bit platform that the

>>> operating

>>> system can power is not necessary for many customers.

>>> Paul LaRochelle, president of PC Authority, a Manchester, N.H., solution

>>> provider, said 99.9 percent of the systems from PC Authority are

>>> shipping

>>> with Windows XP rather than Vista. Since the introduction of Vista, he

>>> said,

>>> PC Authority has sold only a dozen copies of the operating system. "Just

>>> because there is a new car or a bigger hard drive doesn't mean you have

>>> to

>>> go buy it," he said.

>>> Greg Abrams, vice president and director of technology at PC-Plus

>>> Technologies, an Auburn, Mass., solution provider, said his business is

>>> seeing Vista adoption from several major clients. He said about 40

>>> percent

>>> of the systems being shipped from PC-Plus are Vista-based, with 60

>>> percent

>>> XP-based. Furthermore, he said PC-Plus has been working with clients to

>>> rip

>>> Vista off some notebook systems that lack XP drivers. As a result, he

>>> said,

>>> PC-Plus is installing Microsoft Virtual PC 2007 for a number of clients.

>>> Abrams praised Virtual PC 2007, which is free, for solving major

>>> application

>>> compatibility issues so customers can run applications like Adobe

>>> Acrobat

>>> 6.0. "This is more of a [workaround] solution for our customers than a

>>> profit-driver," he said. "It took a lot of time to figure it out and

>>> learn

>>> how to deploy it correctly."

>>> LaRochelle said he feels it is better to wait for the first Windows

>>> Service

>>> Pack to come out before pushing the operating system. Microsoft has said

>>> it

>>> plans to launch the first service pack for Windows Vista during the

>>> first

>>> quarter of 2008.

>>>

>>>

>>>

>

>

On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 17:23:24 -0700, Frank <fb@nosspan.clim> wrote:

>Adam Albright wrote:

>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:15:47 -0700, Frank <fb@nosspan.clim> wrote:

>>

>>

>>>Adam Albright wrote:

>>>

>>>

>>>>On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 22:13:02 +0100, "Synapse Syndrome"

>>>><synapse@NOSPAMgomez404.elitemail.org> wrote:

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>>"Frank" <fb@nosspan.clim> wrote in message

>>>>>news:uFeMwQj%23HHA.396@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>>>So why do you have XP, W2K, and Me still?

>>>>>>

>>>>>>That statement illustrates the fact that you don't have to deal with the

>>>>>>public.

>>>>>>We need to be able to natively open almost any file that comes to us.

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>Let me get this clear: you keep older computers, running these older

>>>>>operating systems, just so you can open other users' files??

>>>>>

>>>>>ss.

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>>Frank just stuck his foot in his mouth again. He must like the taste.

>>>>Don't worry, he does that dozens of times every week then pretends he

>>>>didn't say what he said or that you didn't understand or some other

>>>>half-ass excuse. Don't expect anything rational from Frank, he's just

>>>>a clueless troll that lives in never never land where he fancies

>>>>himself the ultimate computer user.

>>>>

>>>

>>>hehehe...you have no idea what I'm talking about do you? So you just

>>>jump right in and make a fool out of yourself (as usual).

>>>Frank

>>

>>

>> I had you pegged as an clueless idiot that loves to run his mouth

>> after just reading a few of your moronic posts months ago when I first

>> started following this group.

>>

>

>You just "pegged" your foot into your stupid big mouth you ignorant PUTZ!

>Frank

 

Again you show you inability to even make up your own insults

preferring instead to parrot what I've used instead. Another sure sign

of a weak mind. The entire sentence above is made up exclusively from

what I used just today. Pathetic!

On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 17:25:26 -0700, Frank <fb@nosspan.clim> wrote:

>Adam Albright wrote:

>

>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:14:39 -0700, Frank <fb@nosspan.clim> wrote:

>>

>>

>>>Synapse Syndrome wrote:

>>>

>>>>"Frank" <fb@nosspan.clim> wrote in message

>>>>news:uFeMwQj%23HHA.396@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>>>So why do you have XP, W2K, and Me still?

>>>>>

>>>>>That statement illustrates the fact that you don't have to deal with the

>>>>>public.

>>>>>We need to be able to natively open almost any file that comes to us.

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>Let me get this clear: you keep older computers, running these older

>>>>operating systems, just so you can open other users' files??

>>>>

>>>>ss.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>

>>>Exactly! If someone bring us for example and old MS Publisher file, say

>>>v2, we have that version loaded on ME. So we can view the file as original.

>>>Simple huh?

>>>Frank

>>

>>

>> It actually illustrate your level of intelligence. LOW.

>>

>

>hehehe...you have absolutely no idea what we're talking about do you?

>I'll tell you one thing though, lately you're doing stupid really

>well...lol!

>Frank

 

You've been dancing so hard you should sit down and rest awhile old

man.

On 9/18/2007 1:40 PM On a whim, Frank pounded out on the keyboard

> Terry R. wrote:

>

>> On 9/18/2007 11:14 AM On a whim, Frank pounded out on the keyboard

>>

>>> Terry R. wrote:

>>>

>>>> You have been "touting" Vista since your post of "All Vista all the

>>>> time". Are you now going to say you haven't been?

>>>

>>> Haven't been what? Using Vista? Of course we use Vista and I

>>> personally use Vista.

>>> It works just fine for the biz and for my personal use.

>>

>> So why do you have XP, W2K, and Me still?

>

> That statement illustrates the fact that you don't have to deal with the

> public.

> We need to be able to natively open almost any file that comes to us.

 

 

I have Win98, Me, W2K, XP, & Mandrake Linux on separate partitions. But

I'm a consultant who "deals with the public".

 

And what file does an OS open that a newer one won't? None. Are you

saying you're running other software that will ONLY run on Me, or W2K,

or even XP? What would that be Frank? What would POSSIBLY run on Me

that won't run on anything else?

 

 

>>>> Well, Moz 1.7.13 is far from "the best tool for the job at hand".

>>>

>>> It's my personal choice for a news reader and I'll decide what the

>>> best tool is for my own personal use.

>>> Frank

>>>

>> Fine. Just don't call it "the best tool for the job at hand".

>

> For my personal use it is.

 

That tells you how out of touch you are Frank.

>

> Are you

>> afraid of newer technology? -)

>

> Far from it pal...far from it!

> Frank

 

 

--

Terry R.

 

***Reply Note***

Anti-spam measures are included in my email address.

Delete NOSPAM from the email address after clicking Reply.

On 9/18/2007 2:13 PM On a whim, Synapse Syndrome pounded out on the keyboard

> "Frank" <fb@nosspan.clim> wrote in message

> news:uFeMwQj%23HHA.396@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>>> So why do you have XP, W2K, and Me still?

>> That statement illustrates the fact that you don't have to deal with the

>> public.

>> We need to be able to natively open almost any file that comes to us.

>

>

> Let me get this clear: you keep older computers, running these older

> operating systems, just so you can open other users' files??

>

> ss.

>

>

 

No, he said he had XP on another hard drive in a workstation dual

booting with Vista. He didn't mention how the other OS's were installed.

 

 

--

Terry R.

 

***Reply Note***

Anti-spam measures are included in my email address.

Delete NOSPAM from the email address after clicking Reply.

"Terry R." <F1ComNOSPAM@pobox.com> wrote in message

news:eOR1abl%23HHA.1416@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

>>>> So why do you have XP, W2K, and Me still?

>>> That statement illustrates the fact that you don't have to deal with the

>>> public.

>>> We need to be able to natively open almost any file that comes to us.

>>

>> Let me get this clear: you keep older computers, running these older

>> operating systems, just so you can open other users' files??

>

> No, he said he had XP on another hard drive in a workstation dual booting

> with Vista. He didn't mention how the other OS's were installed.

 

That was a secondary point, to which I would have said that he could

consolidate his machines by using VirtualPC.

 

My main point, was why? He's only really need one of either 2000 or XP, and

only a very slight chance of ever needing a Win9x OS for doing whatever he

claims he needs them for.

 

As you know, the applications are of relevance, and not the OS.

 

ss.

"Frank" <fb@nosspan.clim> wrote in message

news:e29QOFk%23HHA.484@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>>

> Exactly! If someone bring us for example and old MS Publisher file, say

> v2, we have that version loaded on ME. So we can view the file as

> original.

> Simple huh?

 

No. Just stupid.

 

What is it you do then? You have some sort of printing bureau? As an

architect, I have a lot of experience in graphic design, using

Photoshop/Illustrator/Acrobat daily (also sometimes InDesign sometimes, and

Quark in the past). So I can easily suss you out.

 

ss.

Adam Albright wrote:

> On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 17:23:24 -0700, Frank <fb@nosspan.clim> wrote:

>

>

>>Adam Albright wrote:

>>

>>>On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:15:47 -0700, Frank <fb@nosspan.clim> wrote:

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>>Adam Albright wrote:

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>>On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 22:13:02 +0100, "Synapse Syndrome"

>>>>><synapse@NOSPAMgomez404.elitemail.org> wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>>"Frank" <fb@nosspan.clim> wrote in message

>>>>>>news:uFeMwQj%23HHA.396@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>So why do you have XP, W2K, and Me still?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>That statement illustrates the fact that you don't have to deal with the

>>>>>>>public.

>>>>>>>We need to be able to natively open almost any file that comes to us.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>Let me get this clear: you keep older computers, running these older

>>>>>>operating systems, just so you can open other users' files??

>>>>>>

>>>>>>ss.

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>Frank just stuck his foot in his mouth again. He must like the taste.

>>>>>Don't worry, he does that dozens of times every week then pretends he

>>>>>didn't say what he said or that you didn't understand or some other

>>>>>half-ass excuse. Don't expect anything rational from Frank, he's just

>>>>>a clueless troll that lives in never never land where he fancies

>>>>>himself the ultimate computer user.

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>>hehehe...you have no idea what I'm talking about do you? So you just

>>>>jump right in and make a fool out of yourself (as usual).

>>>>Frank

>>>

>>>

>>>I had you pegged as an clueless idiot that loves to run his mouth

>>>after just reading a few of your moronic posts months ago when I first

>>>started following this group.

>>>

>>

>>You just "pegged" your foot into your stupid big mouth you ignorant PUTZ!

>>Frank

>

>

> Again you show you inability to even make up your own insults

> preferring instead to parrot what I've used instead. Another sure sign

> of a weak mind. The entire sentence above is made up exclusively from

> what I used just today. Pathetic!

>

hehehe...that's only proves what an idiot you are.

Frank

Synapse Syndrome wrote:

> "Terry R." <F1ComNOSPAM@pobox.com> wrote in message

> news:eOR1abl%23HHA.1416@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

>

>>>>>So why do you have XP, W2K, and Me still?

>>>>

>>>>That statement illustrates the fact that you don't have to deal with the

>>>>public.

>>>>We need to be able to natively open almost any file that comes to us.

>>>

>>>Let me get this clear: you keep older computers, running these older

>>>operating systems, just so you can open other users' files??

>>

>>No, he said he had XP on another hard drive in a workstation dual booting

>>with Vista. He didn't mention how the other OS's were installed.

>

>

> That was a secondary point, to which I would have said that he could

> consolidate his machines by using VirtualPC.

>

> My main point, was why? He's only really need one of either 2000 or XP, and

> only a very slight chance of ever needing a Win9x OS for doing whatever he

> claims he needs them for.

>

> As you know, the applications are of relevance, and not the OS.

>

> ss.

>

>

Exactly!

Frank

"Frank" <fb@nosspan.clim> wrote in message

news:eun3v9l%23HHA.1208@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

>>

> Exactly!

 

 

Erm, Frank.. what exactly are you agreeing to here? It seems to me that you

are agreeing that you are a bit of a moron.

 

ss.

Terry R. wrote:

> On 9/18/2007 1:40 PM On a whim, Frank pounded out on the keyboard

>

>> Terry R. wrote:

>>

>>> On 9/18/2007 11:14 AM On a whim, Frank pounded out on the keyboard

>>>

>>>> Terry R. wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> You have been "touting" Vista since your post of "All Vista all the

>>>>> time". Are you now going to say you haven't been?

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Haven't been what? Using Vista? Of course we use Vista and I

>>>> personally use Vista.

>>>> It works just fine for the biz and for my personal use.

>>>

>>>

>>> So why do you have XP, W2K, and Me still?

>>

>>

>> That statement illustrates the fact that you don't have to deal with

>> the public.

>> We need to be able to natively open almost any file that comes to us.

>

>

>

> I have Win98, Me, W2K, XP, & Mandrake Linux on separate partitions. But

> I'm a consultant who "deals with the public".

 

Good for you!

>

> And what file does an OS open that a newer one won't?

 

What's wrong with you terry? Want to do battle with me? Are you feigning

stupidity or what? We have to install legacy apps that only run properly

on older os's so that we can nativity open the files correctly and as

they were created.

You should already know that, if you are as computer savvy as you say

you are.

So grow up terry. You're beginning to sound just like a stupid ignorant

as*hole!

Frank

"Frank" <fb@nosspan.clim> wrote in message

news:efk8jCm%23HHA.1204@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

>>

>> And what file does an OS open that a newer one won't?

>

> What's wrong with you terry? Want to do battle with me? Are you feigning

> stupidity or what? We have to install legacy apps that only run properly

> on older os's so that we can nativity open the files correctly and as they

> were created.

> You should already know that, if you are as computer savvy as you say you

> are.

> So grow up terry. You're beginning to sound just like a stupid ignorant

> as*hole!

 

 

Hey Frank. I cannot remember there being any significant design apps that

could not run in 2000/XP (essentially the same OS), that could run okay in

Win98. All serious apps would have been designed to run on NT workstations

well before XP ever came out.

 

Professional apps stopped support for Win9x as soon as they could, like

Adobe CS apps and a lot of 3D and CAD programs, so it worked the other way

around.

 

Vista has a lot of compatibilty problems with older software, and this is

much more than it was ever before, with previous new versions of Windows.

 

ss.

Synapse Syndrome wrote:

> "Frank" <fb@nosspan.clim> wrote in message

> news:e29QOFk%23HHA.484@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>

>>Exactly! If someone bring us for example and old MS Publisher file, say

>>v2, we have that version loaded on ME. So we can view the file as

>>original.

>

>

>>Simple huh?

>

>

> No. Just stupid.

>

> What is it you do then? You have some sort of printing bureau? As an

> architect, I have a lot of experience in graphic design, using

> Photoshop/Illustrator/Acrobat daily (also sometimes InDesign sometimes, and

> Quark in the past). So I can easily suss you out.

>

> ss.

>

>

'Suss" me out? What the hell does that mean?

You're architect? Great, so is my brother.

We are an Advertising/Marketing Agency. If you'd paid attention you'd

have seen that I've posted that many times before. We get all kinds of

files, both walk in (mailed in and in person) and thru the Internet.

We have one box dedicated to new files. It has numerous OS's, old and

new and a very wide variety of old and new graphic/word processor apps

installed.

If the file is physically received, we disco the Internet/LAN connection

and run a virus check on the file first thing. If the file is to be

dl'ed, we disco the LAN, dl it and then run the virus check.

If all is well, we then make two copies of the original and create a

physical file to contain the original, (if available) or a copy of the

original dl'ed file that we've created.

As you only mentioned Adobe software, you may not be aware that there

are lots of other, very good, graphic software in use. And some

proprietary software files are not backward compatible. Did you know that?

The worst thing a company like mind could ever say to a paying customer

is…"sorry, but we can't open your file".

Now, call us stupid if you like, but we make a lot of money by being

able to accommodate most everyone's file.

We laugh all the way to the bank!

Frank

Synapse Syndrome wrote:

> "Frank" <fb@nosspan.clim> wrote in message

> news:eun3v9l%23HHA.1208@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

>

>>Exactly!

>

>

>

> Erm, Frank.. what exactly are you agreeing to here? It seems to me that you

> are agreeing that you are a bit of a moron.

>

> ss.

>

>

Errr...maybe it's your reading comprehension is a bit aria...I'm

agreeing to your statement that "As you know, the applications are of

relevance, and not the OS."

But of course, not all apps will run on all OS's, right.

Therefore we only run WinX apps on WinX OS’s.

Frank

Synapse Syndrome wrote:

> "Frank" <fb@nosspan.clim> wrote in message

> news:efk8jCm%23HHA.1204@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

>

>>>And what file does an OS open that a newer one won't?

>>

>>What's wrong with you terry? Want to do battle with me? Are you feigning

>>stupidity or what? We have to install legacy apps that only run properly

>>on older os's so that we can nativity open the files correctly and as they

>>were created.

>>You should already know that, if you are as computer savvy as you say you

>>are.

>>So grow up terry. You're beginning to sound just like a stupid ignorant

>>as*hole!

>

>

>

> Hey Frank. I cannot remember there being any significant design apps that

> could not run in 2000/XP (essentially the same OS), that could run okay in

> Win98. All serious apps would have been designed to run on NT workstations

> well before XP ever came out.

>

> Professional apps stopped support for Win9x as soon as they could, like

> Adobe CS apps and a lot of 3D and CAD programs, so it worked the other way

> around.

>

> Vista has a lot of compatibilty problems with older software, and this is

> much more than it was ever before, with previous new versions of Windows.

>

> ss.

>

>

Then you know what a dep or cft or an evy or ded or an rd4 or an opd

file is. Many of these file will only open using their original app

which in some cases is the only one ever made and will only install on

older WinX's.

Hell, even the latest opd file (v15) will not open in V14. Unbelievable

that a company would do that!

So, I'm not sure where you're going with this thread or what you're

trying to prove, but we've been in biz since the early '80's and have

done quite well with how we operate.

If it bothers you, and it sure seems to, then I can't do anything about

that.

Frank

On 9/18/2007 6:58 PM On a whim, Frank pounded out on the keyboard

> Terry R. wrote:

>

>> On 9/18/2007 1:40 PM On a whim, Frank pounded out on the keyboard

>>

>>> Terry R. wrote:

>>>

>>>> On 9/18/2007 11:14 AM On a whim, Frank pounded out on the keyboard

>>>>

>>>>> Terry R. wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> You have been "touting" Vista since your post of "All Vista all the

>>>>>> time". Are you now going to say you haven't been?

>>>>>

>>>>> Haven't been what? Using Vista? Of course we use Vista and I

>>>>> personally use Vista.

>>>>> It works just fine for the biz and for my personal use.

>>>>

>>>> So why do you have XP, W2K, and Me still?

>>>

>>> That statement illustrates the fact that you don't have to deal with

>>> the public.

>>> We need to be able to natively open almost any file that comes to us.

>>

>>

>> I have Win98, Me, W2K, XP, & Mandrake Linux on separate partitions. But

>> I'm a consultant who "deals with the public".

>

> Good for you!

 

A typical worthless comment. You said I don't have to deal with the

public. Little do you know.

 

>> And what file does an OS open that a newer one won't?

>

> What's wrong with you terry? Want to do battle with me? Are you feigning

> stupidity or what? We have to install legacy apps that only run properly

> on older os's so that we can nativity open the files correctly and as

> they were created.

> You should already know that, if you are as computer savvy as you say

> you are.

> So grow up terry. You're beginning to sound just like a stupid ignorant

> as*hole!

> Frank

 

Like I said Frank, we live close. Care to say that to my face? If not,

move on little man. You're the one who changes what you say with every

post. Don't hide behind your keyboard. Step up or shut up.

 

--

Terry R.

 

***Reply Note***

Anti-spam measures are included in my email address.

Delete NOSPAM from the email address after clicking Reply.