All is CONFIRMED

September 17, 200717 yr

That's F'ing Incredible

Wow, you were successful at installing and using Zone Alarm 7.1. How did

you do it? Inquiring minds want to know. Just FYI. Aren't you an Ubuntu

evangalist now? Just FYI.

What happened to Windows 2008 Server? I thought you were very very upset

with Microsoft and had a tantrum. Just FYI.

<kevpan815@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:D7D325B9-E19E-4257-98B7-394DF4872C5A@microsoft.com...

> P.S. I Was Also Successful At Installing And Using Zone Alarm 7.1 Free

> Edition On 32 Bit Windows Server 2008 June CTP As Well, Just FYI.

>

> <kevpan815@hotmail.com> wrote in message

> news:u$1FhtW#HHA.4184@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>> Indeed, The Only Problem That I Have Found So Far With The Windows Server

>> 2008 June CTP, Is That Microsoft Money 2008 Does Not Work On It, After

>> It's Successfully Installed On It, Just FYI. Otherwise, I Have Had No

>> Major Problems To Report With It, And Most Windows Vista 32 Bit Driver's

>> Work Just Fine On 32 Bit Windows Server 2008 June CTP, Just FYI.

>>

>> "I eat vista" <Ieatvista@gmail.com> wrote in message

>> news:46eec643@newsgate.x-privat.org...

>>> windows 2003 that is a server OS was used by many many many people as a

>>> desktop OS!

>>>

>>> They claimed better stabily and I can say that that must have been true

>>> since

>>> the kernel of win2003 was 5.2 while on XP it was 5.1

>>>

>>> So if all these people were using win2003 as a desktop I see no reason

>>> why people will not use server 2008 as a desktop.

>>>

>>> The only problem really is the cost.. since you can make 2008 function

>>> as a desktop OS>

>>>

>>> "Peter M" . wrote in message

>>> news:%23H1ZKDV%23HHA.5464@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

>>>>

>>>> <kevpan815@hotmail.com> wrote in message

>>>> news:CC9F2C81-5B3F-4088-9813-DA222E22AB41@microsoft.com...

>>>>> Windows Server 2008 Beta 3 Public Beta Is A Much Better Operating

>>>>> System Then Windows Vista RTM, Just FYI.

>>>>>

>>>> OH mighty postal employee (and we know what the IQ requirements to be a

>>>> postman are) you do realize vista is built on the server kernel and in

>>>> fact sp1beta updates vista to the exact same kernel as server 2008.

>>>> But hey, keep licking those stamps and one day you might gravitate to

>>>> envelopes.

>>>

Quote

Mark as Solution

September 17, 200717 yr

Re: Another stupid response

I thought Windows 2008 server was your answer to Vista? Just FYI. Is there

problems in server land? Just FYI. Isn't Windows 2008 Server the BEST

choice for desktop? Just FYI.

Come on Mr. Answerman, give us the information. Just FYI

<kevpan815@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:u$1FhtW%23HHA.4184@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

> Indeed, The Only Problem That I Have Found So Far With The Windows Server

> 2008 June CTP, Is That Microsoft Money 2008 Does Not Work On It, After

> It's Successfully Installed On It, Just FYI. Otherwise, I Have Had No

> Major Problems To Report With It, And Most Windows Vista 32 Bit Driver's

> Work Just Fine On 32 Bit Windows Server 2008 June CTP, Just FYI.

>

> "I eat vista" <Ieatvista@gmail.com> wrote in message

> news:46eec643@newsgate.x-privat.org...

>> windows 2003 that is a server OS was used by many many many people as a

>> desktop OS!

>>

>> They claimed better stabily and I can say that that must have been true

>> since

>> the kernel of win2003 was 5.2 while on XP it was 5.1

>>

>> So if all these people were using win2003 as a desktop I see no reason

>> why people will not use server 2008 as a desktop.

>>

>> The only problem really is the cost.. since you can make 2008 function as

>> a desktop OS>

>>

>> "Peter M" . wrote in message

>> news:%23H1ZKDV%23HHA.5464@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

>>>

>>> <kevpan815@hotmail.com> wrote in message

>>> news:CC9F2C81-5B3F-4088-9813-DA222E22AB41@microsoft.com...

>>>> Windows Server 2008 Beta 3 Public Beta Is A Much Better Operating

>>>> System Then Windows Vista RTM, Just FYI.

>>>>

>>> OH mighty postal employee (and we know what the IQ requirements to be a

>>> postman are) you do realize vista is built on the server kernel and in

>>> fact sp1beta updates vista to the exact same kernel as server 2008. But

>>> hey, keep licking those stamps and one day you might gravitate to

>>> envelopes.

>>

Quote

Mark as Solution

September 17, 200717 yr

On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 13:44:28 -0700, Frank wrote:

> Stephan Rose wrote:

>> On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 11:42:52 -0700, Frank wrote:

>>

>>>First of all space cadet, you need to realize that the restore/delete

>>>problem is an XP problem.

>>>Not a Vista problem.

>>

>> Actually it is a Vista problem. XP already existed, so why doesn't

>> Vista create it's restore points in such a way that XP doesn't get

>> confused by them and delete them?

>>

>> XP can't look in the future and know Vista exists so it can't take

>> changes in Vista into account.

>>

>> Vista however was created after XP so it shouldn't be creating restore

>> points in such a way that it causes XP to delete them. It isn't causing

>> problems with XP..it's ultimately causing problems with Vista, making

>> it a Vista problem.

>>

> It's an XP problem:

>

> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/926185

>

> ..."This problem occurs because the volume snapshot driver that is

> included with Windows Vista and with Windows Server "Longhorn" uses disk

> structures that are incompatible with earlier versions of Windows.

> Therefore, the earlier operating system deletes Windows Vista shadow

> copies or Windows Server "Longhorn" shadow copies together with the

> associated restore points. This behavior occurs because the earlier

> Windows operating systems do not recognize the new disk structures."

>

> Proly be fixed by XP SP3.

Sure a fix can be applied to XP, but ultimately what XP is doing is only

causing issues in Vista. XP is unaffected by it.

That said, I honestly don't get how MS can implement something in a way

that they know XP will destroy. And nobody can tell me they didn't know.

That is why I say it's a problem with Vista. If one knows there's going

to be a problem, why not implement it in a way that it doesn't cause a

problem?

--

Stephan

2003 Yamaha R6

å›ã®ã“ã¨æ€ã„å‡ºã™æ—¥ãªã‚“ã¦ãªã„ã®ã¯

å›ã®ã“ã¨å¿˜ã‚ŒãŸã¨ããŒãªã„ã‹ã‚‰

Quote

Mark as Solution

September 17, 200717 yr

Re: That's F'ing Incredible

Le Mon, 17 Sep 2007 14:00:38 -0700, Bill Yanaire ("Bill Yanaire"

<bill@yanaire.com>) a caressé son clavier pour nous dire ce qui suit:

> Aren't you an Ubuntu

> evangalist now? Just FYI.

Just for your information: Linux and more speciallt Ubuntu is far above

the Vista OS ... FYI

--

Utiliser le butineur, le courrielleur, le lecteur de nouvelles

et l'OS avec lesquels vous vous sentez le plus sécurisé ...

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://news.motzarella.org/

http://mdoucet.wordpress.com/

Quote

Mark as Solution

September 17, 200717 yr

Re: That's F'ing Incredible

"Michel Doucet" <mimi@home.invalid> wrote in message

news:pan.2007.09.17.21.12.10@home.invalid...

> Le Mon, 17 Sep 2007 14:00:38 -0700, Bill Yanaire ("Bill Yanaire"

> <bill@yanaire.com>) a caressé son clavier pour nous dire ce qui suit:

>

>> Aren't you an Ubuntu

>> evangalist now? Just FYI.

>

> Just for your information: Linux and more speciallt Ubuntu is far above

> the Vista OS ... FYI

What? R U on drugs or somethin? Ubuntu is far above Vista? Oh, I get

it, you are at the store and Ubuntu is is far above Vista on the shelf! My

suggestion is to ask one of the associates to bring a ladder over and grab

the Ubuntu off that top shelf. Hurry home, wipe your system clean of Vista

because it's crap according to you and install Ubuntu. When finished, start

hanging around the Ubuntu forum from now on.

>

> --

> Utiliser le butineur, le courrielleur, le lecteur de nouvelles

> et l'OS avec lesquels vous vous sentez le plus sécurisé ...

> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://news.motzarella.org/

> http://mdoucet.wordpress.com/

Quote

Mark as Solution

September 17, 200717 yr

Re: That's F'ing Incredible

Le Mon, 17 Sep 2007 14:21:10 -0700, Bill Yanaire ("Bill Yanaire"

<bill@yanaire.com>) a caressé son clavier pour nous dire ce qui suit:

> What? R U on drugs or somethin? Ubuntu is far above Vista? Oh, I

> get it, you are at the store and Ubuntu is is far above Vista on the

> shelf! My suggestion is to ask one of the associates to bring a ladder

> over and grab the Ubuntu off that top shelf. Hurry home, wipe your

> system clean of Vista because it's crap according to you and install

> Ubuntu. When finished, start hanging around the Ubuntu forum from now

> on.

Are you paid by Bill ? Your earnings will decrease for sure after

Microsof has paid European Community ! 500,000,000 ¤ ....

--

Utiliser le butineur, le courrielleur, le lecteur de nouvelles

et l'OS avec lesquels vous vous sentez le plus sécurisé ...

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://news.motzarella.org/

http://mdoucet.wordpress.com/

Quote

Mark as Solution

September 17, 200717 yr

Re: That's F'ing Incredible

"Michel Doucet" <mimi@home.invalid> wrote in message

news:pan.2007.09.17.21.26.03@home.invalid...

> Le Mon, 17 Sep 2007 14:21:10 -0700, Bill Yanaire ("Bill Yanaire"

> <bill@yanaire.com>) a caressé son clavier pour nous dire ce qui suit:

>

>> What? R U on drugs or somethin? Ubuntu is far above Vista? Oh, I

>> get it, you are at the store and Ubuntu is is far above Vista on the

>> shelf! My suggestion is to ask one of the associates to bring a ladder

>> over and grab the Ubuntu off that top shelf. Hurry home, wipe your

>> system clean of Vista because it's crap according to you and install

>> Ubuntu. When finished, start hanging around the Ubuntu forum from now

>> on.

>

> Are you paid by Bill ? Your earnings will decrease for sure after

> Microsof has paid European Community ! 500,000,000 ¤ ....

By the way, yes I am. I get paid lots more than you!

>

> --

> Utiliser le butineur, le courrielleur, le lecteur de nouvelles

> et l'OS avec lesquels vous vous sentez le plus sécurisé ...

> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://news.motzarella.org/

> http://mdoucet.wordpress.com/

Quote

Mark as Solution

September 17, 200717 yr

Stephan Rose wrote:

>

> Sure a fix can be applied to XP, but ultimately what XP is doing is only

> causing issues in Vista. XP is unaffected by it.

>

> That said, I honestly don't get how MS can implement something in a way

> that they know XP will destroy. And nobody can tell me they didn't know.

I'm sure they knew but were more concerned with the new structure of

Vista than any incompatibility with XP. Anyway it's only a problem for

just a few and there are work arounds...one being using separate

physical HDD for XP & Vista...which is what I've done on one box that

has XP, 2K, ME and Vista on it.

> That is why I say it's a problem with Vista.

No, it's an XP problem as the fix will be applied to XP, not Vista.

If one knows there's going

> to be a problem, why not implement it in a way that it doesn't cause a

> problem?

I'm sure they would have done that had it been possible.

But of course, all we're doing is speculating. :-)

Frank

>

Quote

Mark as Solution

September 17, 200717 yr

This problem occurs because the volume snapshot driver that is

included with Windows Vista and with Windows Server "Longhorn" uses disk

structures that are incompatible with earlier versions of Windows.

This problem occurs because the volume snapshot driver that is

included with Windows Vista and with Windows Server

AGAIN YOU STUPID IDIOT

This problem occurs because the volume snapshot driver that is

included with Windows Vista and with Windows Server

"Frank" <fb@nosspan.clim> wrote in message

news:uyUDMuW%23HHA.4180@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

> Stephan Rose wrote:

>> On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 11:42:52 -0700, Frank wrote:

>>

>>>>

>>>First of all space cadet, you need to realize that the restore/delete

>>>problem is an XP problem.

>>>Not a Vista problem.

>>

>> Actually it is a Vista problem. XP already existed, so why doesn't Vista

>> create it's restore points in such a way that XP doesn't get confused by

>> them and delete them?

>>

>> XP can't look in the future and know Vista exists so it can't take

>> changes in Vista into account.

>>

>> Vista however was created after XP so it shouldn't be creating restore

>> points in such a way that it causes XP to delete them. It isn't causing

>> problems with XP..it's ultimately causing problems with Vista, making it

>> a Vista problem.

>>

>

> It's an XP problem:

>

> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/926185

>

> ..."This problem occurs because the volume snapshot driver that is

> included with Windows Vista and with Windows Server "Longhorn" uses disk

> structures that are incompatible with earlier versions of Windows.

> Therefore, the earlier operating system deletes Windows Vista shadow

> copies or Windows Server "Longhorn" shadow copies together with the

> associated restore points. This behavior occurs because the earlier

> Windows operating systems do not recognize the new disk structures."

>

> Proly be fixed by XP SP3.

> Frank

Quote

Mark as Solution

September 17, 200717 yr

I don't think dual-boot users are MSs primary target or a very large

audience, that is likely why it wasn't tested. Again, if some of you are

so sure Vista sucks, don't use it.

--

bob_c_b

Quote

Mark as Solution

September 17, 200717 yr

"I eat vista" <Ieatvista@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:46eef4ea@newsgate.x-privat.org...

> This problem occurs because the volume snapshot driver that is

> included with Windows Vista and with Windows Server "Longhorn" uses disk

> structures that are incompatible with earlier versions of Windows.

>

> This problem occurs because the volume snapshot driver that is

> included with Windows Vista and with Windows Server

Actually you are wrong. The problem occurs is when you type something and

post to the vista.general group.

>

> AGAIN YOU STUPID IDIOT

You are talking about yourself again.

>

> This problem occurs because the volume snapshot driver that is

> included with Windows Vista and with Windows Server

>

The problem occurs when you do anything, anywhere. Best thing you can do is

flush yourself down the toilet. Just FYI.

>

> "Frank" <fb@nosspan.clim> wrote in message

> news:uyUDMuW%23HHA.4180@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>> Stephan Rose wrote:

>>> On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 11:42:52 -0700, Frank wrote:

>>>

>>>>>

>>>>First of all space cadet, you need to realize that the restore/delete

>>>>problem is an XP problem.

>>>>Not a Vista problem.

>>>

>>> Actually it is a Vista problem. XP already existed, so why doesn't Vista

>>> create it's restore points in such a way that XP doesn't get confused by

>>> them and delete them?

>>>

>>> XP can't look in the future and know Vista exists so it can't take

>>> changes in Vista into account.

>>>

>>> Vista however was created after XP so it shouldn't be creating restore

>>> points in such a way that it causes XP to delete them. It isn't causing

>>> problems with XP..it's ultimately causing problems with Vista, making it

>>> a Vista problem.

>>>

>>

>> It's an XP problem:

>>

>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/926185

>>

>> ..."This problem occurs because the volume snapshot driver that is

>> included with Windows Vista and with Windows Server "Longhorn" uses disk

>> structures that are incompatible with earlier versions of Windows.

>> Therefore, the earlier operating system deletes Windows Vista shadow

>> copies or Windows Server "Longhorn" shadow copies together with the

>> associated restore points. This behavior occurs because the earlier

>> Windows operating systems do not recognize the new disk structures."

>>

>> Proly be fixed by XP SP3.

>> Frank

>

Quote

Mark as Solution

September 17, 200717 yr

Yanaire I see you are following the footsteps of your role model Frank..

be careful, he is dumber than you.. but you are trying hard to reach his

level of stupidity.

"Bill Yanaire" <bill@yanaire.com> wrote in message

news:eNuWFSX%23HHA.1208@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

>

> "I eat vista" <Ieatvista@gmail.com> wrote in message

> news:46eef4ea@newsgate.x-privat.org...

>> This problem occurs because the volume snapshot driver that is

>> included with Windows Vista and with Windows Server "Longhorn" uses disk

>> structures that are incompatible with earlier versions of Windows.

>>

>> This problem occurs because the volume snapshot driver that is

>> included with Windows Vista and with Windows Server

>

> Actually you are wrong. The problem occurs is when you type something and

> post to the vista.general group.

>>

>> AGAIN YOU STUPID IDIOT

>

> You are talking about yourself again.

>>

>> This problem occurs because the volume snapshot driver that is

>> included with Windows Vista and with Windows Server

>>

> The problem occurs when you do anything, anywhere. Best thing you can do

> is flush yourself down the toilet. Just FYI.

>

>>

>> "Frank" <fb@nosspan.clim> wrote in message

>> news:uyUDMuW%23HHA.4180@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>>> Stephan Rose wrote:

>>>> On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 11:42:52 -0700, Frank wrote:

>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>First of all space cadet, you need to realize that the restore/delete

>>>>>problem is an XP problem.

>>>>>Not a Vista problem.

>>>>

>>>> Actually it is a Vista problem. XP already existed, so why doesn't

>>>> Vista create it's restore points in such a way that XP doesn't get

>>>> confused by them and delete them?

>>>>

>>>> XP can't look in the future and know Vista exists so it can't take

>>>> changes in Vista into account.

>>>>

>>>> Vista however was created after XP so it shouldn't be creating restore

>>>> points in such a way that it causes XP to delete them. It isn't causing

>>>> problems with XP..it's ultimately causing problems with Vista, making

>>>> it a Vista problem.

>>>>

>>>

>>> It's an XP problem:

>>>

>>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/926185

>>>

>>> ..."This problem occurs because the volume snapshot driver that is

>>> included with Windows Vista and with Windows Server "Longhorn" uses disk

>>> structures that are incompatible with earlier versions of Windows.

>>> Therefore, the earlier operating system deletes Windows Vista shadow

>>> copies or Windows Server "Longhorn" shadow copies together with the

>>> associated restore points. This behavior occurs because the earlier

>>> Windows operating systems do not recognize the new disk structures."

>>>

>>> Proly be fixed by XP SP3.

>>> Frank

>>

>

Quote

Mark as Solution

September 17, 200717 yr

Don't be late

"I eat vista" <Ieatvista@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:46eef71a$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...

> Yanaire I see you are following the footsteps of your role model Frank..

> be careful, he is dumber than you.. but you are trying hard to reach his

> level of stupidity.

If you look up from the gutter, raw sewage is smarter than you. Just FYI.

By the way, Senator Craig called and said that he wants to meet you in the

public restroom over near the airport. Hurry and don't be late. Bring

flowers.

Just FYI.

>

> "Bill Yanaire" <bill@yanaire.com> wrote in message

> news:eNuWFSX%23HHA.1208@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

>>

>> "I eat vista" <Ieatvista@gmail.com> wrote in message

>> news:46eef4ea@newsgate.x-privat.org...

>>> This problem occurs because the volume snapshot driver that is

>>> included with Windows Vista and with Windows Server "Longhorn" uses disk

>>> structures that are incompatible with earlier versions of Windows.

>>>

>>> This problem occurs because the volume snapshot driver that is

>>> included with Windows Vista and with Windows Server

>>

>> Actually you are wrong. The problem occurs is when you type something

>> and post to the vista.general group.

>>>

>>> AGAIN YOU STUPID IDIOT

>>

>> You are talking about yourself again.

>>>

>>> This problem occurs because the volume snapshot driver that is

>>> included with Windows Vista and with Windows Server

>>>

>> The problem occurs when you do anything, anywhere. Best thing you can do

>> is flush yourself down the toilet. Just FYI.

>>

>>>

>>> "Frank" <fb@nosspan.clim> wrote in message

>>> news:uyUDMuW%23HHA.4180@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>>>> Stephan Rose wrote:

>>>>> On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 11:42:52 -0700, Frank wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>First of all space cadet, you need to realize that the restore/delete

>>>>>>problem is an XP problem.

>>>>>>Not a Vista problem.

>>>>>

>>>>> Actually it is a Vista problem. XP already existed, so why doesn't

>>>>> Vista create it's restore points in such a way that XP doesn't get

>>>>> confused by them and delete them?

>>>>>

>>>>> XP can't look in the future and know Vista exists so it can't take

>>>>> changes in Vista into account.

>>>>>

>>>>> Vista however was created after XP so it shouldn't be creating restore

>>>>> points in such a way that it causes XP to delete them. It isn't

>>>>> causing problems with XP..it's ultimately causing problems with Vista,

>>>>> making it a Vista problem.

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> It's an XP problem:

>>>>

>>>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/926185

>>>>

>>>> ..."This problem occurs because the volume snapshot driver that is

>>>> included with Windows Vista and with Windows Server "Longhorn" uses

>>>> disk structures that are incompatible with earlier versions of Windows.

>>>> Therefore, the earlier operating system deletes Windows Vista shadow

>>>> copies or Windows Server "Longhorn" shadow copies together with the

>>>> associated restore points. This behavior occurs because the earlier

>>>> Windows operating systems do not recognize the new disk structures."

>>>>

>>>> Proly be fixed by XP SP3.

>>>> Frank

>>>

>>

>

Quote

Mark as Solution

September 17, 200717 yr

Ah another Linux troll.

"Harry" wrote:

> I fully agree with you and went back to XP Pro

> "I eat vista" <Ieatvista@gmail.com> wrote in message

> news:46ee8cb9@newsgate.x-privat.org...

> >I am very happy to say that things I have been saying over the past 1 year

> > are all confirmed. Of course I am sad to see that I had to say all these

> > things in the first place.

> > Vista should have been better, then no need for criticism and rejection

> > would exist.

> >

> > - Vista is far slower than XP

> > - Vista search is horrid, slow, gets corrupted and thrashes the disk. The

> > service should be turned off. It doesnt work.

> > - The vista start menu design is extremely bad, with menus that collapse

> > upon itself.

> > - Vista is unstable and incompatible with no great reason since it is NT

> > kernel.

> > - Vista is not user friendly, creating frustration to the simple user

> > - Readyboost is a gimmick that helps only a small percentage of machines.

> > Its more of a crutch to help vista pull its own obese weight. Many have

> > reported a NEGATIVE result when trying it on machines with much ram.

> > - Vista is not compatible with XP when in dual boot, since its restore

> > format conflicts with XP and XP detects it and erases it. Clearly a vista

> > problem since the vista designers should have taken this into account.

> > -The colors and fonts and general design of the theme makes it hard to see

> > the information presented. Numerous people have complained about this with

> > good cause.

> > - The SPEECH to Text function is a joke. It doesnt work!

> > - Vistas "better memory management" is a myth. By loading vast amount of

> > data on to the ram and therefore "using it all" there is no significant

> > improvement in performance compared to XP. In fact XP wins hands down on

> > almost all comparisons.

> > - The fast vista boot is also a myth. Systems with lots of programs

> > installed,

> > start just as slow as XP

> > - The "Branded sounds" in Vista was a stupid thing that users don't like

> > and

> > are looking for ways to change.

> > - Windows Mail uses EML format and that creates thousands upon thousands

> > of

> > files when you have lots of emails, the result is slower loading of

> > windows

> > mail and very bad performance.

> > - The simplified vista DEFRAGMENT with no visual feedback is slower, and

> > most people absolutely hate it. A clear degrade from XP's defrag. The

> > result

> > is people searching for third party solutions

> > -Copying and moving files in vista is a joke.. even deleting small files

> > takes up to much time.

> > -Network speed is horrendous

> > -People hate the internet explorer 7 toolbar that cannot be configured.

> > -SP1 will not save vista, its bad design is so well integrated that

> > nothing

> > can save it.

> > -Windows vista is over-all comparably the worse OS Microsoft has ever

> > made..

> > even worse that windows Me.

> > -The cost of use of vista (in time, labor and upgrade expenses) is more

> > than anything ever seen before.

> > -People who really like vista are stupid. No one who has above average

> > intelligence could actually think vista is a good OS. Sorry guys.

> >

> > Over all vista has a "not finished" badly designed, amateur, and stupid

> > feeling to it that frustrates the common user. So much that people have

> > shot vista computers with guns!

> >

> > I have more.. I might add with later posts...

> >

>

Quote

Mark as Solution

September 17, 200717 yr

I eat vista wrote:

> Yanaire I see you are following the footsteps of your role model Frank..

> be careful, he is dumber than you.. but you are trying hard to reach his

> level of stupidity.

>

> "Bill Yanaire" <bill@yanaire.com> wrote in message

> news:eNuWFSX%23HHA.1208@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

>

>>"I eat vista" <Ieatvista@gmail.com> wrote in message

>>news:46eef4ea@newsgate.x-privat.org...

>>

>>>This problem occurs because the volume snapshot driver that is

>>>included with Windows Vista and with Windows Server "Longhorn" uses disk

>>>structures that are incompatible with earlier versions of Windows.

>>>

>>>This problem occurs because the volume snapshot driver that is

>>>included with Windows Vista and with Windows Server

>>

>>Actually you are wrong. The problem occurs is when you type something and

>>post to the vista.general group.

>>

>>>AGAIN YOU STUPID IDIOT

>>

>>You are talking about yourself again.

>>

>>>This problem occurs because the volume snapshot driver that is

>>>included with Windows Vista and with Windows Server

>>>

>>

>>The problem occurs when you do anything, anywhere. Best thing you can do

>>is flush yourself down the toilet. Just FYI.

>>

>>>

>>>"Frank" <fb@nosspan.clim> wrote in message

>>>news:uyUDMuW%23HHA.4180@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>>>

>>>>Stephan Rose wrote:

>>>>

>>>>>On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 11:42:52 -0700, Frank wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>>First of all space cadet, you need to realize that the restore/delete

>>>>>>problem is an XP problem.

>>>>>>Not a Vista problem.

>>>>>

>>>>>Actually it is a Vista problem. XP already existed, so why doesn't

>>>>>Vista create it's restore points in such a way that XP doesn't get

>>>>>confused by them and delete them?

>>>>>

>>>>>XP can't look in the future and know Vista exists so it can't take

>>>>>changes in Vista into account.

>>>>>

>>>>>Vista however was created after XP so it shouldn't be creating restore

>>>>>points in such a way that it causes XP to delete them. It isn't causing

>>>>>problems with XP..it's ultimately causing problems with Vista, making

>>>>>it a Vista problem.

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>>It's an XP problem:

>>>>

>>>>http://support.microsoft.com/kb/926185

>>>>

>>>>..."This problem occurs because the volume snapshot driver that is

>>>>included with Windows Vista and with Windows Server "Longhorn" uses disk

>>>>structures that are incompatible with earlier versions of Windows.

>>>>Therefore, the earlier operating system deletes Windows Vista shadow

>>>>copies or Windows Server "Longhorn" shadow copies together with the

>>>>associated restore points. This behavior occurs because the earlier

>>>>Windows operating systems do not recognize the new disk structures."

>>>>

>>>>Proly be fixed by XP SP3.

>>>>Frank

>>>

>>

>

Why are you here?

You're not using Vista are you?

Frank

Quote

Mark as Solution

September 17, 200717 yr

I eat vista wrote:

> This problem occurs because the volume snapshot driver that is

> included with Windows Vista and with Windows Server "Longhorn" uses disk

> structures that are incompatible with earlier versions of Windows.

>

Yes, that's what the article says.

I hope you can read.

The problem emanates in XP, not Vista.

It will proly be fixed in XP SP3.

Frank

Quote

Mark as Solution

September 17, 200717 yr

Ron K. wrote:

> Ah another Linux troll.

Another top posting Wintard who has reading comprehension problem.

"Harry" said he "went back to XP Pro". Last I checked, there is no Linux

Distro called "XP Pro".

--

Alias

To email me, remove shoes

>

> "Harry" wrote:

>

>> I fully agree with you and went back to XP Pro

>> "I eat vista" <Ieatvista@gmail.com> wrote in message

>> news:46ee8cb9@newsgate.x-privat.org...

>>> I am very happy to say that things I have been saying over the past 1 year

>>> are all confirmed. Of course I am sad to see that I had to say all these

>>> things in the first place.

>>> Vista should have been better, then no need for criticism and rejection

>>> would exist.

>>>

>>> - Vista is far slower than XP

>>> - Vista search is horrid, slow, gets corrupted and thrashes the disk. The

>>> service should be turned off. It doesnt work.

>>> - The vista start menu design is extremely bad, with menus that collapse

>>> upon itself.

>>> - Vista is unstable and incompatible with no great reason since it is NT

>>> kernel.

>>> - Vista is not user friendly, creating frustration to the simple user

>>> - Readyboost is a gimmick that helps only a small percentage of machines.

>>> Its more of a crutch to help vista pull its own obese weight. Many have

>>> reported a NEGATIVE result when trying it on machines with much ram.

>>> - Vista is not compatible with XP when in dual boot, since its restore

>>> format conflicts with XP and XP detects it and erases it. Clearly a vista

>>> problem since the vista designers should have taken this into account.

>>> -The colors and fonts and general design of the theme makes it hard to see

>>> the information presented. Numerous people have complained about this with

>>> good cause.

>>> - The SPEECH to Text function is a joke. It doesnt work!

>>> - Vistas "better memory management" is a myth. By loading vast amount of

>>> data on to the ram and therefore "using it all" there is no significant

>>> improvement in performance compared to XP. In fact XP wins hands down on

>>> almost all comparisons.

>>> - The fast vista boot is also a myth. Systems with lots of programs

>>> installed,

>>> start just as slow as XP

>>> - The "Branded sounds" in Vista was a stupid thing that users don't like

>>> and

>>> are looking for ways to change.

>>> - Windows Mail uses EML format and that creates thousands upon thousands

>>> of

>>> files when you have lots of emails, the result is slower loading of

>>> windows

>>> mail and very bad performance.

>>> - The simplified vista DEFRAGMENT with no visual feedback is slower, and

>>> most people absolutely hate it. A clear degrade from XP's defrag. The

>>> result

>>> is people searching for third party solutions

>>> -Copying and moving files in vista is a joke.. even deleting small files

>>> takes up to much time.

>>> -Network speed is horrendous

>>> -People hate the internet explorer 7 toolbar that cannot be configured.

>>> -SP1 will not save vista, its bad design is so well integrated that

>>> nothing

>>> can save it.

>>> -Windows vista is over-all comparably the worse OS Microsoft has ever

>>> made..

>>> even worse that windows Me.

>>> -The cost of use of vista (in time, labor and upgrade expenses) is more

>>> than anything ever seen before.

>>> -People who really like vista are stupid. No one who has above average

>>> intelligence could actually think vista is a good OS. Sorry guys.

>>>

>>> Over all vista has a "not finished" badly designed, amateur, and stupid

>>> feeling to it that frustrates the common user. So much that people have

>>> shot vista computers with guns!

>>>

>>> I have more.. I might add with later posts...

>>>

>>

Quote

Mark as Solution

September 17, 200717 yr

Re: That's F'ing Incredible

On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 21:26:16 +0000, Michel Doucet wrote:

> Le Mon, 17 Sep 2007 14:21:10 -0700, Bill Yanaire ("Bill Yanaire"

> <bill@yanaire.com>) a caressÃ© son clavier pour nous dire ce qui suit:

>

>> What? R U on drugs or somethin? Ubuntu is far above Vista? Oh, I

>> get it, you are at the store and Ubuntu is is far above Vista on the

>> shelf! My suggestion is to ask one of the associates to bring a ladder

>> over and grab the Ubuntu off that top shelf. Hurry home, wipe your

>> system clean of Vista because it's crap according to you and install

>> Ubuntu. When finished, start hanging around the Ubuntu forum from now

>> on.

>

> Are you paid by Bill ? Your earnings will decrease for sure after

> Microsof has paid European Community ! 500,000,000 â‚¬ ....

Ehhh, while that's a nice amount...isn't that pretty much just spare

pocket change to MS?

--

Stephan

2003 Yamaha R6

å›ã®ã“ã¨æ€ã„å‡ºã™æ—¥ãªã‚“ã¦ãªã„ã®ã¯

å›ã®ã“ã¨å¿˜ã‚ŒãŸã¨ããŒãªã„ã‹ã‚‰

Quote

Mark as Solution

September 17, 200717 yr

On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 14:35:22 -0700, Frank wrote:

> Stephan Rose wrote:

>

>>

>> Sure a fix can be applied to XP, but ultimately what XP is doing is

>> only causing issues in Vista. XP is unaffected by it.

>>

>> That said, I honestly don't get how MS can implement something in a way

>> that they know XP will destroy. And nobody can tell me they didn't

>> know.

>

> I'm sure they knew but were more concerned with the new structure of

> Vista than any incompatibility with XP. Anyway it's only a problem for

> just a few and there are work arounds...one being using separate

> physical HDD for XP & Vista...which is what I've done on one box that

> has XP, 2K, ME and Vista on it.

Well I agree with ya on one thing, one OS per drive. Period. I personally

don't like throwing multiple OS' on a single drive either.

Though I suppose I may need to break that rule on my next system if I

actually do build myself a raid array. It'll be hard to dedicate Windows

and Ubuntu each to their own physical drive then.

Though there is this one new hard drive out that is really tempting,

maybe I'll just buy two of those instead. Up to 200 gigs capacity and it

has 1 gig worth of cache in the form of RAM with a 90 second battery

backup in case of power failure to commit said cache to media if

necessary.

Supposed to be extremely fast due to its huge cache.

>

>> That is why I say it's a problem with Vista.

>

> No, it's an XP problem as the fix will be applied to XP, not Vista.

Vista is still the one that's having the problem with it. =)

>

> If one knows there's going

>> to be a problem, why not implement it in a way that it doesn't cause a

>> problem?

>

> I'm sure they would have done that had it been possible. But of course,

> all we're doing is speculating. :-) Frank

Personally I would not say that it would have been impossible. Most

software related things these days are generally not impossible,

though...they can be inconvenient to implement. But agreed, all either

one of us can do on the matter is speculate.

--

Stephan

2003 Yamaha R6

å›ã®ã“ã¨æ€ã„å‡ºã™æ—¥ãªã‚“ã¦ãªã„ã®ã¯

å›ã®ã“ã¨å¿˜ã‚ŒãŸã¨ããŒãªã„ã‹ã‚‰

Quote

Mark as Solution

September 18, 200717 yr

Re: Another stupid response

ENOUGH WITH THE FYI CRAP.

"Bill Yanaire" wrote:

> I thought Windows 2008 server was your answer to Vista? Just FYI. Is there

> problems in server land? Just FYI. Isn't Windows 2008 Server the BEST

> choice for desktop? Just FYI.

>

> Come on Mr. Answerman, give us the information. Just FYI

>

> <kevpan815@hotmail.com> wrote in message

> news:u$1FhtW%23HHA.4184@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

> > Indeed, The Only Problem That I Have Found So Far With The Windows Server

> > 2008 June CTP, Is That Microsoft Money 2008 Does Not Work On It, After

> > It's Successfully Installed On It, Just FYI. Otherwise, I Have Had No

> > Major Problems To Report With It, And Most Windows Vista 32 Bit Driver's

> > Work Just Fine On 32 Bit Windows Server 2008 June CTP, Just FYI.

> >

> > "I eat vista" <Ieatvista@gmail.com> wrote in message

> > news:46eec643@newsgate.x-privat.org...

> >> windows 2003 that is a server OS was used by many many many people as a

> >> desktop OS!

> >>

> >> They claimed better stabily and I can say that that must have been true

> >> since

> >> the kernel of win2003 was 5.2 while on XP it was 5.1

> >>

> >> So if all these people were using win2003 as a desktop I see no reason

> >> why people will not use server 2008 as a desktop.

> >>

> >> The only problem really is the cost.. since you can make 2008 function as

> >> a desktop OS>

> >>

> >> "Peter M" . wrote in message

> >> news:%23H1ZKDV%23HHA.5464@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

> >>>

> >>> <kevpan815@hotmail.com> wrote in message

> >>> news:CC9F2C81-5B3F-4088-9813-DA222E22AB41@microsoft.com...

> >>>> Windows Server 2008 Beta 3 Public Beta Is A Much Better Operating

> >>>> System Then Windows Vista RTM, Just FYI.

> >>>>

> >>> OH mighty postal employee (and we know what the IQ requirements to be a

> >>> postman are) you do realize vista is built on the server kernel and in

> >>> fact sp1beta updates vista to the exact same kernel as server 2008. But

> >>> hey, keep licking those stamps and one day you might gravitate to

> >>> envelopes.

> >>

>

Quote

Mark as Solution

September 18, 200717 yr

> Distro called "XP Pro".

lol gee its the vista-virus getting to whats left of their brains!!!!

"Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

news:fcn1tv$uvh$1@aioe.org...

> Ron K. wrote:

>> Ah another Linux troll.

>

> Another top posting Wintard who has reading comprehension problem. "Harry"

> said he "went back to XP Pro". Last I checked, there is no Linux Distro

> called "XP Pro".

>

> --

> Alias

> To email me, remove shoes

>

>>

>> "Harry" wrote:

>>

>>> I fully agree with you and went back to XP Pro

>>> "I eat vista" <Ieatvista@gmail.com> wrote in message

>>> news:46ee8cb9@newsgate.x-privat.org...

>>>> I am very happy to say that things I have been saying over the past 1

>>>> year

>>>> are all confirmed. Of course I am sad to see that I had to say all

>>>> these things in the first place.

>>>> Vista should have been better, then no need for criticism and rejection

>>>> would exist.

>>>>

>>>> - Vista is far slower than XP

>>>> - Vista search is horrid, slow, gets corrupted and thrashes the disk.

>>>> The

>>>> service should be turned off. It doesnt work.

>>>> - The vista start menu design is extremely bad, with menus that

>>>> collapse

>>>> upon itself.

>>>> - Vista is unstable and incompatible with no great reason since it is

>>>> NT

>>>> kernel.

>>>> - Vista is not user friendly, creating frustration to the simple user

>>>> - Readyboost is a gimmick that helps only a small percentage of

>>>> machines.

>>>> Its more of a crutch to help vista pull its own obese weight. Many have

>>>> reported a NEGATIVE result when trying it on machines with much ram.

>>>> - Vista is not compatible with XP when in dual boot, since its restore

>>>> format conflicts with XP and XP detects it and erases it. Clearly a

>>>> vista

>>>> problem since the vista designers should have taken this into account.

>>>> -The colors and fonts and general design of the theme makes it hard to

>>>> see

>>>> the information presented. Numerous people have complained about this

>>>> with

>>>> good cause.

>>>> - The SPEECH to Text function is a joke. It doesnt work!

>>>> - Vistas "better memory management" is a myth. By loading vast amount

>>>> of

>>>> data on to the ram and therefore "using it all" there is no significant

>>>> improvement in performance compared to XP. In fact XP wins hands down

>>>> on

>>>> almost all comparisons.

>>>> - The fast vista boot is also a myth. Systems with lots of programs

>>>> installed,

>>>> start just as slow as XP

>>>> - The "Branded sounds" in Vista was a stupid thing that users don't

>>>> like and

>>>> are looking for ways to change.

>>>> - Windows Mail uses EML format and that creates thousands upon

>>>> thousands of

>>>> files when you have lots of emails, the result is slower loading of

>>>> windows

>>>> mail and very bad performance.

>>>> - The simplified vista DEFRAGMENT with no visual feedback is slower,

>>>> and

>>>> most people absolutely hate it. A clear degrade from XP's defrag. The

>>>> result

>>>> is people searching for third party solutions

>>>> -Copying and moving files in vista is a joke.. even deleting small

>>>> files

>>>> takes up to much time.

>>>> -Network speed is horrendous

>>>> -People hate the internet explorer 7 toolbar that cannot be configured.

>>>> -SP1 will not save vista, its bad design is so well integrated that

>>>> nothing

>>>> can save it.

>>>> -Windows vista is over-all comparably the worse OS Microsoft has ever

>>>> made..

>>>> even worse that windows Me.

>>>> -The cost of use of vista (in time, labor and upgrade expenses) is more

>>>> than anything ever seen before.

>>>> -People who really like vista are stupid. No one who has above average

>>>> intelligence could actually think vista is a good OS. Sorry guys.

>>>>

>>>> Over all vista has a "not finished" badly designed, amateur, and stupid

>>>> feeling to it that frustrates the common user. So much that people have

>>>> shot vista computers with guns!

>>>>

>>>> I have more.. I might add with later posts...

>>>>

>>>

Quote

Mark as Solution

September 18, 200717 yr

Re: Don't be late

spanky you are impersonating an idiot called bill yanair now? Is he your new

role model?

Ok.. but just dont impersonate frank.. his stupidity might stick forever and

reduce yout IQ from one to zero

"Bill Yanaire" <bill@yanaire.com> wrote in message

news:Of1mOYX%23HHA.980@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>

> "I eat vista" <Ieatvista@gmail.com> wrote in message

> news:46eef71a$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...

>> Yanaire I see you are following the footsteps of your role model Frank..

>> be careful, he is dumber than you.. but you are trying hard to reach his

>> level of stupidity.

>

> If you look up from the gutter, raw sewage is smarter than you. Just FYI.

> By the way, Senator Craig called and said that he wants to meet you in the

> public restroom over near the airport. Hurry and don't be late. Bring

> flowers.

>

> Just FYI.

>

>>

>> "Bill Yanaire" <bill@yanaire.com> wrote in message

>> news:eNuWFSX%23HHA.1208@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

>>>

>>> "I eat vista" <Ieatvista@gmail.com> wrote in message

>>> news:46eef4ea@newsgate.x-privat.org...

>>>> This problem occurs because the volume snapshot driver that is

>>>> included with Windows Vista and with Windows Server "Longhorn" uses

>>>> disk

>>>> structures that are incompatible with earlier versions of Windows.

>>>>

>>>> This problem occurs because the volume snapshot driver that is

>>>> included with Windows Vista and with Windows Server

>>>

>>> Actually you are wrong. The problem occurs is when you type something

>>> and post to the vista.general group.

>>>>

>>>> AGAIN YOU STUPID IDIOT

>>>

>>> You are talking about yourself again.

>>>>

>>>> This problem occurs because the volume snapshot driver that is

>>>> included with Windows Vista and with Windows Server

>>>>

>>> The problem occurs when you do anything, anywhere. Best thing you can

>>> do is flush yourself down the toilet. Just FYI.

>>>

>>>>

>>>> "Frank" <fb@nosspan.clim> wrote in message

>>>> news:uyUDMuW%23HHA.4180@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>>>>> Stephan Rose wrote:

>>>>>> On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 11:42:52 -0700, Frank wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>First of all space cadet, you need to realize that the restore/delete

>>>>>>>problem is an XP problem.

>>>>>>>Not a Vista problem.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Actually it is a Vista problem. XP already existed, so why doesn't

>>>>>> Vista create it's restore points in such a way that XP doesn't get

>>>>>> confused by them and delete them?

>>>>>>

>>>>>> XP can't look in the future and know Vista exists so it can't take

>>>>>> changes in Vista into account.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Vista however was created after XP so it shouldn't be creating

>>>>>> restore points in such a way that it causes XP to delete them. It

>>>>>> isn't causing problems with XP..it's ultimately causing problems with

>>>>>> Vista, making it a Vista problem.

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> It's an XP problem:

>>>>>

>>>>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/926185

>>>>>

>>>>> ..."This problem occurs because the volume snapshot driver that is

>>>>> included with Windows Vista and with Windows Server "Longhorn" uses

>>>>> disk structures that are incompatible with earlier versions of

>>>>> Windows. Therefore, the earlier operating system deletes Windows Vista

>>>>> shadow copies or Windows Server "Longhorn" shadow copies together with

>>>>> the associated restore points. This behavior occurs because the

>>>>> earlier Windows operating systems do not recognize the new disk

>>>>> structures."

>>>>>

>>>>> Proly be fixed by XP SP3.

>>>>> Frank

>>>>

>>>

>>

>

Quote

Mark as Solution

September 18, 200717 yr

Oh my... Aren't you the one...

Aren't you the one with that mentally disabled syndrome. Just FYI. I am so

sorry to hear about your condition. Just FYI. I hear there are facilities

throughout the country that can help someone like you. Just FYI.

Good luck.

Just FYI

"Erwin Moller"

<Since_humans_read_this_I_am_spammed_too_much@spamyourself.com> wrote in

message news:46ee9920$0$244$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl...

>I eat vista wrote:

>> I am very happy to say that things I have been saying over the past 1

>> year

>> are all confirmed. Of course I am sad to see that I had to say all these

>> things in the first place.

>> Vista should have been better, then no need for criticism and rejection

>> would exist.

>>

>> - Vista is far slower than XP

>> - Vista search is horrid, slow, gets corrupted and thrashes the disk. The

>> service should be turned off. It doesnt work.

>> - The vista start menu design is extremely bad, with menus that collapse

>> upon itself.

>> - Vista is unstable and incompatible with no great reason since it is NT

>> kernel.

>> - Vista is not user friendly, creating frustration to the simple user

>> - Readyboost is a gimmick that helps only a small percentage of machines.

>> Its more of a crutch to help vista pull its own obese weight. Many have

>> reported a NEGATIVE result when trying it on machines with much ram.

>> - Vista is not compatible with XP when in dual boot, since its restore

>> format conflicts with XP and XP detects it and erases it. Clearly a vista

>> problem since the vista designers should have taken this into account.

>> -The colors and fonts and general design of the theme makes it hard to

>> see

>> the information presented. Numerous people have complained about this

>> with

>> good cause.

>> - The SPEECH to Text function is a joke. It doesnt work!

>> - Vistas "better memory management" is a myth. By loading vast amount of

>> data on to the ram and therefore "using it all" there is no significant

>> improvement in performance compared to XP. In fact XP wins hands down on

>> almost all comparisons.

>> - The fast vista boot is also a myth. Systems with lots of programs

>> installed,

>> start just as slow as XP

>> - The "Branded sounds" in Vista was a stupid thing that users don't like

>> and

>> are looking for ways to change.

>> - Windows Mail uses EML format and that creates thousands upon thousands

>> of

>> files when you have lots of emails, the result is slower loading of

>> windows

>> mail and very bad performance.

>> - The simplified vista DEFRAGMENT with no visual feedback is slower, and

>> most people absolutely hate it. A clear degrade from XP's defrag. The

>> result

>> is people searching for third party solutions

>> -Copying and moving files in vista is a joke.. even deleting small files

>> takes up to much time.

>> -Network speed is horrendous

>> -People hate the internet explorer 7 toolbar that cannot be configured.

>> -SP1 will not save vista, its bad design is so well integrated that

>> nothing

>> can save it.

>> -Windows vista is over-all comparably the worse OS Microsoft has ever

>> made..

>> even worse that windows Me.

>> -The cost of use of vista (in time, labor and upgrade expenses) is more

>> than anything ever seen before.

>> -People who really like vista are stupid. No one who has above average

>> intelligence could actually think vista is a good OS. Sorry guys.

>>

>> Over all vista has a "not finished" badly designed, amateur, and stupid

>> feeling to it that frustrates the common user. So much that people have

>> shot vista computers with guns!

>>

>> I have more.. I might add with later posts...

>>

>

> Please add some of my 'favorite' annoyances:

>

> - Impossible to change language of the OS (unless it is Zulu)

> - Impossible to resize some windows (core-Vista windows. I have windows in

> IIS7/msconfig that contain information I cannot read because it is behind

> a button or something like that.)

> - Why can Vista not copy a 300MB file from cdrom?

> I am sure my old W95 box could do that...

> I get exceptions/errors thrown at my head if I try. (Workaround, zip the

> file from cdrom to desktop, unzip it there. Even if the zipping gives 0

> results in smaller filesize, it circumvents Vistas inability to copy large

> files.)

>

> Regards,

> Erwin Moller

Quote

Mark as Solution

September 18, 200717 yr

He can't use Vista

"Frank" <fb@nosspan.clim> wrote in message

news:ez8tWcX%23HHA.748@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

>I eat vista wrote:

>

>> Yanaire I see you are following the footsteps of your role model Frank..

>> be careful, he is dumber than you.. but you are trying hard to reach his

>> level of stupidity.

>>

>> "Bill Yanaire" <bill@yanaire.com> wrote in message

>> news:eNuWFSX%23HHA.1208@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

>>

>>>"I eat vista" <Ieatvista@gmail.com> wrote in message

>>>news:46eef4ea@newsgate.x-privat.org...

>>>

>>>>This problem occurs because the volume snapshot driver that is

>>>>included with Windows Vista and with Windows Server "Longhorn" uses disk

>>>>structures that are incompatible with earlier versions of Windows.

>>>>

>>>>This problem occurs because the volume snapshot driver that is

>>>>included with Windows Vista and with Windows Server

>>>

>>>Actually you are wrong. The problem occurs is when you type something

>>>and post to the vista.general group.

>>>

>>>>AGAIN YOU STUPID IDIOT

>>>

>>>You are talking about yourself again.

>>>

>>>>This problem occurs because the volume snapshot driver that is

>>>>included with Windows Vista and with Windows Server

>>>>

>>>

>>>The problem occurs when you do anything, anywhere. Best thing you can do

>>>is flush yourself down the toilet. Just FYI.

>>>

>>>>

>>>>"Frank" <fb@nosspan.clim> wrote in message

>>>>news:uyUDMuW%23HHA.4180@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>>>>

>>>>>Stephan Rose wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>>On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 11:42:52 -0700, Frank wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>>First of all space cadet, you need to realize that the restore/delete

>>>>>>>problem is an XP problem.

>>>>>>>Not a Vista problem.

>>>>>>

>>>>>>Actually it is a Vista problem. XP already existed, so why doesn't

>>>>>>Vista create it's restore points in such a way that XP doesn't get

>>>>>>confused by them and delete them?

>>>>>>

>>>>>>XP can't look in the future and know Vista exists so it can't take

>>>>>>changes in Vista into account.

>>>>>>

>>>>>>Vista however was created after XP so it shouldn't be creating restore

>>>>>>points in such a way that it causes XP to delete them. It isn't

>>>>>>causing problems with XP..it's ultimately causing problems with Vista,

>>>>>>making it a Vista problem.

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>It's an XP problem:

>>>>>

>>>>>http://support.microsoft.com/kb/926185

>>>>>

>>>>>..."This problem occurs because the volume snapshot driver that is

>>>>>included with Windows Vista and with Windows Server "Longhorn" uses

>>>>>disk structures that are incompatible with earlier versions of Windows.

>>>>>Therefore, the earlier operating system deletes Windows Vista shadow

>>>>>copies or Windows Server "Longhorn" shadow copies together with the

>>>>>associated restore points. This behavior occurs because the earlier

>>>>>Windows operating systems do not recognize the new disk structures."

>>>>>

>>>>>Proly be fixed by XP SP3.

>>>>>Frank

>>>>

>>>

>>

> Why are you here?

> You're not using Vista are you?

> Frank

The reason he can't use Vista is because when he walks he drags his knuckles

on the ground and makes a chimping sound.

He then gets bananas and swings in trees.

Quote

Mark as Solution

September 18, 200717 yr

Stephan Rose wrote:

> On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 10:41:40 -0400, Tom Lake wrote:

>

> Gaining and keeping customers is easy. Regaining lost customers on the

> other hand, now that one is extremely difficult.

>

You have that exactly right Stephan

Quote

Mark as Solution

Sign In

All is CONFIRMED

Guest, which answer was the most helpful?

Featured Replies

Popular Days

Join the conversation

Popular Days

Account

Navigation

Search