FPCH Admin allheart55 Cindy E Posted February 7, 2016 FPCH Admin Posted February 7, 2016 Microsoft's ambitious plan to get Windows 10 running on a billion devices within the next few years depends to a large extent on the success of its free upgrade offer. When the company first announced the terms of that offer last May, it literally included an asterisk and fine print. Those terms have changed slightly over the intervening months, but one element has remained constant: The offer is good for one year after the availability of Windows 10. Here's the actual wording of the offer, as it appears today: It's free and easy Upgrade confidently - 100+ million fans have upgraded and are loving it. You'll have a free, full version of Windows 10 -- not a trial or a lite version -- if you complete your upgrade before July 29, 2016. And this is what currently appears in the fine print at the bottom of that page (emphasis added): There's plenty of precedent for this, based on past behavior. For Windows 7 and 8, Microsoft offered significant introductory discounts and then ended them on schedule after a few months, with no extensions. I suppose that could happen here, too. But does it make sense? Not really. There's no financial reason to pull the plug after one year. Retail upgrades have historically represented a microscopic share of Microsoft's revenue (see the chart in this article), and most customers who might have been willing to pay for an upgrade will have taken advantage of the free offer by then. Asking existing Windows 7 users to pay $99 or more after they've spent a year avoiding the free upgrade seems like a surefire way to guarantee that they never upgrade. That significantly increases the risk of an XP-style mess come 2020. I consider this scenario highly unlikely. Scenario 2: Microsoft extends the free upgrade offer indefinitely. The point of imposing an expiration date is to add some urgency to the upgrade decision. Act now! Don't be shut out! In theory, the company could get to the end of the free upgrade period, declare that the entire program has been an unbridled success, and just extend it. But all that strategy does is provide an excuse for laggards to keep kicking the can down the road for as long as possible. That doesn't align with any of Microsoft's goals, and as a result I consider this scenario also highly unlikely Scenario 3: A new "free upgrade" offer replaces the current offer. Sometime in the first half of 2016, Microsoft plans to ship the next major feature upgrade to Windows 10, codenamed "Redstone." Members of the Windows Insider program are currently testing preview releases of the first Redstone builds, and the release notes for the latest build, 14251, offers a hint that new features will begin arriving very soon: We're at the beginning of a new development cycle for our next feature update to Windows 10, and that means teams will be checking in lots of new code as they integrate their feature payloads. In the new "Windows as a Service" model, Microsoft says it plans to deliver two or three new releases each year. So let's assume that Redstone arrives six months after the version 1511 update. That would put its release date in May 2016, which would give Microsoft about two months for one final push to convince holdouts to take advantage of the free upgrade offer before it expires. And then July 29, 2016, rolls around. That's a perfect opportunity to brag about the success of the upgrade offer so far and to say it's been so successful that Microsoft is extending it for a limited time. (Remember, the point of the deadline is to add urgency.) One possible extension date is October 31, 2016. That's when OEM sales of new PCs with Windows 7 Professional officially end. Another possibility? December 31, 2016. New rules for the New Year, and an opportunity to capture upgrades from one last holiday buying season. But the most likely date, as far as I'm concerned, is July 17, 2017. That's the date when Microsoft plans to drop support for Windows 7 and Windows 8.1 on hardware that's based on the latest generation of Intel CPUs, codenamed Skylake. Aligning those dates would be perfectly in keeping with Microsoft's long-term goals and offer a carrot (free upgrades) to go with the stick (an early end of support) for those customers. After watching Microsoft in action over the past few years, I'm fairly certain that even the top executives haven't yet decided exactly what to do in six months. That decision might not be made until very late, and it certainly won't be communicated to the public anytime soon. If someone tries to tell you they know what will happen come that day, don't believe them. Source: zdnet Quote ~I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.~ ~~Robert McCloskey~~
FPCH Admin AWS Posted February 7, 2016 FPCH Admin Posted February 7, 2016 I see number 3 happening. Timeline would be about right. Microsoft wants a 2 year major upgrade cycle. With their beta cycle for new OS being 1 year. That means the free upgrade offer kicks in for the new version being tested as the old offer expires. Quote Off Topic Forum - Unlike the Rest
Recommended Posts