Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

bd3e58ba488789cbe4e491e277a9afdb.jpg

 

Photos for OS X brings Apple's new, system-live image and video service to the Mac.

 

That meant an end to Apple's traditional photography tools, iPhoto and Aperture, but in their place Photos for OX offers seamless integration with Photos for iOS. That includes sync for both content and edits via iCloud Photo Library. With optimized storage, only your most frequent, favorite, and recent images and videos take up space on your Mac's drive while the rest are stores a click-and-download away on Apple's servers. Yet, as much as Photos for OS X may have replaced iPhoto, it's left some Aperture users looking for more. So, what would you change?

 

  • Support for external editors.
  • Multiple library import and merge.
  • Post-import de-duplication.
  • Brush tools (Dodge, burn, blur, sharpen, etc.).
  • Photo extensions (like iOS).
  • Aperture-style Loupe.
  • Sync Faces/Smart albums.
  • Star or up/down ratings.
  • Add/edit geolocation data.
  • Family sharing.

 

Photos for OS X is a reboot, something born of the iCloud age, but it's also a version 1.0. Apple is already working on OS X 10.11 and presumably Photos for Mac version 2.0. If Apple asked you, what would you want to see in it?

 

Photos for OS X

 

3365b811f771fa6c023f556e797b71e8.gif

 

 

e0007c7a03f3424ed46688cced5fd46e._.png

9026f5691d57b3b3e029121bf82a8c62._.png

820e81e7ffaf2437ff2835a18c42022a._.png

 

fd843dcec5f1107e11d954f3164d65a9._.gif62ff9c9df0a6f09059454f9679573584._.gif160ec80d96344ab2b932fe1a76704b71._.gif

 

Continue reading...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...