Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • FPCH Admin
Posted

52dc427d266f8cfa8cb3341011c2ee77.jpg

 

When Windows 10 got announced, there was one immediately glaring question: Why Windows 10? Maybe for the extra distance from 8, but a Redditor who claims to be a Microsoft dev has a better—and funnier—answer.

 

The name "Windows 9" could break a whole bunch of lazy code.

 

Microsoft just announced the newest version of Windows. It's called Windows 10.

Cranbourne describes the issue like this:

 

2a25bc067ac0fb3c9b80cdf976831220.png

 

If you're not code literate, allow me to explain. An easy (and lazy, and bad) way to check what version of Windows a user is running is to just read in the first little bit of the name the operating system is using to identify itself.

 

There are better ways to do it, but if that first bit reads "Windows 9" it means the operating system has to be either Windows 95 or Windows 98.

 

Unless of course there's a Windows 9.

 

It's a y2k sort of problem, where programmers either didn't think the Windows naming scheme could ever generate another "Windows 9x" version, or didn't want to bother future-proofing their code to control for it.

 

And while it's just an unsubstantiated theory that this is why the name is Windows 10, the problem this coder brings up is verifiably a common shortcut. We've reached out to Microsoft for comment, but we may never really know. What's for sure though is that this name just happens to solve one big, obnoxious problem.

 

Update: A Microsoft spokesperson provided us with the following, mystery-preserving statement:

 

Windows 10 carries Windows forward into a new way of doing things. It is not an incremental change, but a new Windows that will empower the next billion users.

~I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.~

~~Robert McCloskey~~

  • FPCH Admin
Posted
While that is possible a good coder would simply change the function. I highly doubt Microsoft programmers are to lazy to fix a small section of code or that Microsoft would even allow a name change based on a function of the code that may or may not work in the name was Windows 9.
  • FPCH Admin
Posted
Yeah, they can speculate all they want, I didn't believe it for a minute. :D

~I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.~

~~Robert McCloskey~~

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...