"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

news:mpm0f3lbucu8k3hcsak4b699rnhefhn771@4ax.com...

> On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 23:28:36 +0100, "dennis@home"

> <dennis@killspam.kicks-ass.net> wrote:

>

>>

>>"Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

>>news:fcog3u$i7c$2@aioe.org...

>>> dennis@home wrote:

>>>>

>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

>>>> news:fco9d6$vvn$1@aioe.org...

>>>>

>>>>> Fact: the only computers that are members of herd bots are Windows

>>>>> boxes. Live with it or wake up and go Open Source.

>>>>

>>>> You can say that as often as you like.. it doesn't make it true.. it

>>>> just

>>>> makes *you* sound crazy.

>>>> I don't think anyone is going to take notice of a crazy person so you

>>>> may

>>>> as well either tell the truth or go away.

>>>

>>> Ad hominem attacks are probably the most amateurish was of debating. I

>>> stand by what I said and you can't prove otherwise. Insulting me, btw,

>>> it

>>> not proving otherwise.

>>

>>That is not an insult.. it is a statement of fact.

>

> Oh, you like facts. Here's one: You're just another pompous windbag.

>

>>It is you that results to insults when you have lost the debate as it is

>>you

>>that uses the other crude debating tactics in a vain attempt to conceal

>>your

>>blatant ignorance.

>

> Like you do? Funny, where I come from calling someone 'crazy' isn't

> meant as a complement.

>

 

You are like alias and can't/don't bother to read what is said.

This gets you into chucking insults like those above for no reason other

than your own stupidity.

dennis@home wrote:

>

> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

> news:fcpm1d$18c$1@aioe.org...

>> dennis@home wrote:

>>>

>>> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

>>> news:fcog3u$i7c$2@aioe.org...

>>>> dennis@home wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

>>>>> news:fco9d6$vvn$1@aioe.org...

>>>>>

>>>>>> Fact: the only computers that are members of herd bots are Windows

>>>>>> boxes. Live with it or wake up and go Open Source.

>>>>>

>>>>> You can say that as often as you like.. it doesn't make it true..

>>>>> it just makes *you* sound crazy.

>>>>> I don't think anyone is going to take notice of a crazy person so

>>>>> you may as well either tell the truth or go away.

>>>>

>>>> Ad hominem attacks are probably the most amateurish was of debating.

>>>> I stand by what I said and you can't prove otherwise. Insulting me,

>>>> btw, it not proving otherwise.

>>>

>>> That is not an insult.. it is a statement of fact.

>>

>> Calling me crazy isn't an insult?

>

> I didn't call you crazy.. you just don't/can't read.

 

No you can't read. You called me crazy twice. See what you wrote above.

>

>> What world do you live in?

>

> Not the same one as you by the stuff you claim to believe to be true.

>

>

>>> It is you that results to insults when you have lost the debate as it

>>> is you that uses the other crude debating tactics in a vain attempt

>>> to conceal your blatant ignorance.

>>

>> Fact:the only computers that are members of herd bots are Windows

>> boxes. Live with it or wake up and go Open Source. Calling me crazy or

>> saying I have crude debating tactics doesn't address this fact. It's

>> an ad hominem attack, a very amateurish debating technique.

>

> Fact: You still don't understand even the basics of computing but are

> prepared to claim to be an expert and advise others.. badly.

> No amount of claiming others are insulting you when they aren't or lying

> when they aren't is going to change the fact that you are ignorant when

> it comes to computers. Listening and learning is the only way you will

> improve and you don't appear to be capable of that.

 

More unfounded insults. I stand by my statement that Linux boxes are not

a part of herd bots and hundreds of thousands of Windows boxes are. I

also stand by my statement that, compared to Windows, Linux is

bulletproof. Calling me names and lying about me will not refute that.

 

--

Alias

To email me, remove shoes

On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 10:52:30 +0100, "dennis@home"

<dennis@killspam.kicks-ass.net> wrote:

 

>Fact: You still don't understand even the basics of computing but are

>prepared to claim to be an expert and advise others.. badly.

 

Damn, isn't that exactly what you and the typical fanboy does Dennis?

 

ROTFLAMO!

>No amount of claiming others are insulting you when they aren't or lying

>when they aren't is going to change the fact that you are ignorant when it

>comes to computers. Listening and learning is the only way you will improve

>and you don't appear to be capable of that.

 

You're rapidly getting as delusional as our resident troll Frank.

Re: Lies

 

Alias wrote:

> Mama Putzke wrote:

>

>> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

>> news:fco5rk$mm9$1@aioe.org...

>>

>>> NT Canuck wrote:

>>>

>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> Yeah, but Windows boxes have been proven to be more virus prone and

>>>>> Windows boxes are the only boxes that are members of herd bots that

>>>>> send us all the spam. You are talking about a theoretical

>>>>> possibility when, in reality, Windows boxes are the ones spreading

>>>>> crap all over the Internet, not Linux boxes. Proof is in the

>>>>> pudding and all that jazz.

>>>>

>>>> Someone once told me Windows Users weren't very smart,

>>>> certainly not smart enough to write a virus.

>>>

>>> So?

>>>

>>>> Windows Servers that suffer as Spamming Hosts were

>>>> obviously taken over by people smarter than the

>>>> Windows Server SysAdmin...looking around...hmm...

>>>> what kind of group does that leave?

>>>

>>> So?

>>>

>>>> The reality of the situation is that both operating systems

>>>> are prone to attacks and exploits constantly...

>>>

>>> False.

>>>

>>>> People are most often drawn to Windows Systems because

>>>> it's easy enough to use and learn for the entire family.

>>>

>>> Ubuntu is much easier to run than Windows will ever be.

>>

>>

>> Lie! Lie! Lie Windows is much easier than Ubuntu - Every where Every

>> time. Stop spreading lies.

>>

>>

>

> You wish. Ubuntu is MUCH easier than Windows. Course, how would you

> know, being as you've never installed Ubuntu.

>

I have, it isn't!

Frank

Re: Lies

 

Frank wrote:

> Alias wrote:

>

>> Mama Putzke wrote:

>>

>>> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

>>> news:fco5rk$mm9$1@aioe.org...

>>>

>>>> NT Canuck wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> Yeah, but Windows boxes have been proven to be more virus prone

>>>>>> and Windows boxes are the only boxes that are members of herd bots

>>>>>> that send us all the spam. You are talking about a theoretical

>>>>>> possibility when, in reality, Windows boxes are the ones spreading

>>>>>> crap all over the Internet, not Linux boxes. Proof is in the

>>>>>> pudding and all that jazz.

>>>>>

>>>>> Someone once told me Windows Users weren't very smart,

>>>>> certainly not smart enough to write a virus.

>>>>

>>>> So?

>>>>

>>>>> Windows Servers that suffer as Spamming Hosts were

>>>>> obviously taken over by people smarter than the

>>>>> Windows Server SysAdmin...looking around...hmm...

>>>>> what kind of group does that leave?

>>>>

>>>> So?

>>>>

>>>>> The reality of the situation is that both operating systems

>>>>> are prone to attacks and exploits constantly...

>>>>

>>>> False.

>>>>

>>>>> People are most often drawn to Windows Systems because

>>>>> it's easy enough to use and learn for the entire family.

>>>>

>>>> Ubuntu is much easier to run than Windows will ever be.

>>>

>>>

>>> Lie! Lie! Lie Windows is much easier than Ubuntu - Every where Every

>>> time. Stop spreading lies.

>>>

>>>

>>

>> You wish. Ubuntu is MUCH easier than Windows. Course, how would you

>> know, being as you've never installed Ubuntu.

>>

> I have, it isn't!

> Frank

 

You haven't and it is.

 

--

Alias

To email me, remove shoes

Re: Lies

 

Alias wrote:

> Frank wrote:

>

>> Alias wrote:

>>

>>> Mama Putzke wrote:

>>>

>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

>>>> news:fco5rk$mm9$1@aioe.org...

>>>>

>>>>> NT Canuck wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Yeah, but Windows boxes have been proven to be more virus prone

>>>>>>> and Windows boxes are the only boxes that are members of herd

>>>>>>> bots that send us all the spam. You are talking about a

>>>>>>> theoretical possibility when, in reality, Windows boxes are the

>>>>>>> ones spreading crap all over the Internet, not Linux boxes. Proof

>>>>>>> is in the pudding and all that jazz.

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Someone once told me Windows Users weren't very smart,

>>>>>> certainly not smart enough to write a virus.

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> So?

>>>>>

>>>>>> Windows Servers that suffer as Spamming Hosts were

>>>>>> obviously taken over by people smarter than the

>>>>>> Windows Server SysAdmin...looking around...hmm...

>>>>>> what kind of group does that leave?

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> So?

>>>>>

>>>>>> The reality of the situation is that both operating systems

>>>>>> are prone to attacks and exploits constantly...

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> False.

>>>>>

>>>>>> People are most often drawn to Windows Systems because

>>>>>> it's easy enough to use and learn for the entire family.

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Ubuntu is much easier to run than Windows will ever be.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Lie! Lie! Lie Windows is much easier than Ubuntu - Every where

>>>> Every time. Stop spreading lies.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>

>>> You wish. Ubuntu is MUCH easier than Windows. Course, how would you

>>> know, being as you've never installed Ubuntu.

>>>

>> I have, it isn't!

>> Frank

>

>

> You haven't and it is.

>

More lies! I've installed and used ubuntu. It is not easier to use than

windows.

The whole world knows that that, is a fact.

Live with it.

Frank

Re: Lies

 

Frank wrote:

> Alias wrote:

>

>> Frank wrote:

>>

>>> Alias wrote:

>>>

>>>> Mama Putzke wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

>>>>> news:fco5rk$mm9$1@aioe.org...

>>>>>

>>>>>> NT Canuck wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Yeah, but Windows boxes have been proven to be more virus prone

>>>>>>>> and Windows boxes are the only boxes that are members of herd

>>>>>>>> bots that send us all the spam. You are talking about a

>>>>>>>> theoretical possibility when, in reality, Windows boxes are the

>>>>>>>> ones spreading crap all over the Internet, not Linux boxes.

>>>>>>>> Proof is in the pudding and all that jazz.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Someone once told me Windows Users weren't very smart,

>>>>>>> certainly not smart enough to write a virus.

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> So?

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Windows Servers that suffer as Spamming Hosts were

>>>>>>> obviously taken over by people smarter than the

>>>>>>> Windows Server SysAdmin...looking around...hmm...

>>>>>>> what kind of group does that leave?

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> So?

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> The reality of the situation is that both operating systems

>>>>>>> are prone to attacks and exploits constantly...

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> False.

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> People are most often drawn to Windows Systems because

>>>>>>> it's easy enough to use and learn for the entire family.

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Ubuntu is much easier to run than Windows will ever be.

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Lie! Lie! Lie Windows is much easier than Ubuntu - Every where

>>>>> Every time. Stop spreading lies.

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> You wish. Ubuntu is MUCH easier than Windows. Course, how would you

>>>> know, being as you've never installed Ubuntu.

>>>>

>>> I have, it isn't!

>>> Frank

>>

>>

>> You haven't and it is.

>>

> More lies! I've installed and used ubuntu.

 

A lie.

> It is not easier to use than

> windows.

 

Another lie.

> The whole world knows that that, is a fact.

 

No, it is your ill informed opinion.

> Live with it.

> Frank

 

Sigh.

--

Alias

To email me, remove shoes

"Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

news:fcqshr$30h$1@aioe.org...

> dennis@home wrote:

>>

>> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

>> news:fcpm1d$18c$1@aioe.org...

>>> dennis@home wrote:

>>>>

>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

>>>> news:fcog3u$i7c$2@aioe.org...

>>>>> dennis@home wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

>>>>>> news:fco9d6$vvn$1@aioe.org...

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Fact: the only computers that are members of herd bots are Windows

>>>>>>> boxes. Live with it or wake up and go Open Source.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> You can say that as often as you like.. it doesn't make it true.. it

>>>>>> just makes *you* sound crazy.

>>>>>> I don't think anyone is going to take notice of a crazy person so you

>>>>>> may as well either tell the truth or go away.

>>>>>

>>>>> Ad hominem attacks are probably the most amateurish was of debating. I

>>>>> stand by what I said and you can't prove otherwise. Insulting me, btw,

>>>>> it not proving otherwise.

>>>>

>>>> That is not an insult.. it is a statement of fact.

>>>

>>> Calling me crazy isn't an insult?

>>

>> I didn't call you crazy.. you just don't/can't read.

>

> No you can't read. You called me crazy twice. See what you wrote above.

 

Now you are showing an inability to understand English.

Maybe that is why you get confused about what you think you know.. you just

don't understand what is written?

>>> What world do you live in?

>>

>> Not the same one as you by the stuff you claim to believe to be true.

>>

>>

>>>> It is you that results to insults when you have lost the debate as it

>>>> is you that uses the other crude debating tactics in a vain attempt to

>>>> conceal your blatant ignorance.

>>>

>>> Fact:the only computers that are members of herd bots are Windows boxes.

>>> Live with it or wake up and go Open Source. Calling me crazy or saying I

>>> have crude debating tactics doesn't address this fact. It's an ad

>>> hominem attack, a very amateurish debating technique.

>>

>> Fact: You still don't understand even the basics of computing but are

>> prepared to claim to be an expert and advise others.. badly.

>> No amount of claiming others are insulting you when they aren't or lying

>> when they aren't is going to change the fact that you are ignorant when

>> it comes to computers. Listening and learning is the only way you will

>> improve and you don't appear to be capable of that.

>

> More unfounded insults. I stand by my statement that Linux boxes are not a

> part of herd bots and hundreds of thousands of Windows boxes are. I also

> stand by my statement that, compared to Windows, Linux is bulletproof.

> Calling me names and lying about me will not refute that.

 

I stand by the fact that you are wrong.

Also I have not insulted you, you just don't understand English.

You can attempt to draw the conversation away from the fact that you are

wrong if you want.. it is just a sign of you being childish.

"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

news:9u72f39djp9bdqstijipf1e5sbjjtghee6@4ax.com...

> On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 10:52:30 +0100, "dennis@home"

> <dennis@killspam.kicks-ass.net> wrote:

>

>

>>Fact: You still don't understand even the basics of computing but are

>>prepared to claim to be an expert and advise others.. badly.

>

> Damn, isn't that exactly what you and the typical fanboy does Dennis?

 

As I have already stated in this group that I am not a Vista expert then

that can't be true can it?

Are you also having trouble reading what is said?

On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 19:52:39 +0100, "dennis@home"

<dennis@killspam.kicks-ass.net> wrote:

>

>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

>news:9u72f39djp9bdqstijipf1e5sbjjtghee6@4ax.com...

>> On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 10:52:30 +0100, "dennis@home"

>> <dennis@killspam.kicks-ass.net> wrote:

>>

>>

>>>Fact: You still don't understand even the basics of computing but are

>>>prepared to claim to be an expert and advise others.. badly.

>>

>> Damn, isn't that exactly what you and the typical fanboy does Dennis?

>

>As I have already stated in this group that I am not a Vista expert then

>that can't be true can it?

>Are you also having trouble reading what is said?

 

Nobody has trouble reading any of the crap 'you said' since you write

at best at a 6th grade level. Hell, even the idiot Frank probably can

get most of what you're trying to say. Your problem is what you claim.

I know that now you're trying to pretend you didn't call Alias 'crazy'

when I've quoted your own words which like all blowhards you've now

deleted in your replies in some feeble effort to pretend you didn't

say what you said. That sir is expected of 3rd graders, not adults. So

I got to ask, are you older than 14? You sure don't act like it.

"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

news:qfs2f35hsq22hmep82puhgm3hmb3j2q23c@4ax.com...

> On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 19:52:39 +0100, "dennis@home"

> <dennis@killspam.kicks-ass.net> wrote:

>

>>

>>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

>>news:9u72f39djp9bdqstijipf1e5sbjjtghee6@4ax.com...

>>> On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 10:52:30 +0100, "dennis@home"

>>> <dennis@killspam.kicks-ass.net> wrote:

>>>

>>>

>>>>Fact: You still don't understand even the basics of computing but are

>>>>prepared to claim to be an expert and advise others.. badly.

>>>

>>> Damn, isn't that exactly what you and the typical fanboy does Dennis?

>>

>>As I have already stated in this group that I am not a Vista expert then

>>that can't be true can it?

>

>>Are you also having trouble reading what is said?

>

> Nobody has trouble reading any of the crap 'you said' since you write

> at best at a 6th grade level. Hell, even the idiot Frank probably can

> get most of what you're trying to say. Your problem is what you claim.

 

I find that I have to write in very simple terms for you and alias.. you

have provided more proof of the fact that you can't/don't read in this post.

You state that I have snipped stuff from the post to hide things which I

have not.

I also understand that a reader can always refer back to the original post

so it would be pointless doing as you claim.

If you really can't understand this then it is just too much work talking to

you.

> I know that now you're trying to pretend you didn't call Alias 'crazy'

 

If you are so sure I said that then produce the evidence.. be advised that

if you do attempt to do so it will just prove that you can't/don't

read/understand what you claim is 6th grade English (what is that in UK

speak?).

> when I've quoted your own words which like all blowhards you've now

> deleted in your replies in some feeble effort to pretend you didn't

> say what you said. That sir is expected of 3rd graders, not adults. So

> I got to ask, are you older than 14? You sure don't act like it.

>

 

Not once have you quoted anything that backs up what you claim BTW.

dennis@home wrote:

>

> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

> news:fcqshr$30h$1@aioe.org...

>> dennis@home wrote:

>>>

>>> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

>>> news:fcpm1d$18c$1@aioe.org...

>>>> dennis@home wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

>>>>> news:fcog3u$i7c$2@aioe.org...

>>>>>> dennis@home wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

>>>>>>> news:fco9d6$vvn$1@aioe.org...

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Fact: the only computers that are members of herd bots are

>>>>>>>> Windows boxes. Live with it or wake up and go Open Source.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> You can say that as often as you like.. it doesn't make it true..

>>>>>>> it just makes *you* sound crazy.

>>>>>>> I don't think anyone is going to take notice of a crazy person so

>>>>>>> you may as well either tell the truth or go away.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Ad hominem attacks are probably the most amateurish was of

>>>>>> debating. I stand by what I said and you can't prove otherwise.

>>>>>> Insulting me, btw, it not proving otherwise.

>>>>>

>>>>> That is not an insult.. it is a statement of fact.

>>>>

>>>> Calling me crazy isn't an insult?

>>>

>>> I didn't call you crazy.. you just don't/can't read.

>>

>> No you can't read. You called me crazy twice. See what you wrote above.

>

> Now you are showing an inability to understand English.

> Maybe that is why you get confused about what you think you know.. you

> just don't understand what is written?

>

>>>> What world do you live in?

>>>

>>> Not the same one as you by the stuff you claim to believe to be true.

>>>

>>>

>>>>> It is you that results to insults when you have lost the debate as

>>>>> it is you that uses the other crude debating tactics in a vain

>>>>> attempt to conceal your blatant ignorance.

>>>>

>>>> Fact:the only computers that are members of herd bots are Windows

>>>> boxes. Live with it or wake up and go Open Source. Calling me crazy

>>>> or saying I have crude debating tactics doesn't address this fact.

>>>> It's an ad hominem attack, a very amateurish debating technique.

>>>

>>> Fact: You still don't understand even the basics of computing but are

>>> prepared to claim to be an expert and advise others.. badly.

>>> No amount of claiming others are insulting you when they aren't or

>>> lying when they aren't is going to change the fact that you are

>>> ignorant when it comes to computers. Listening and learning is the

>>> only way you will improve and you don't appear to be capable of that.

>>

>> More unfounded insults. I stand by my statement that Linux boxes are

>> not a part of herd bots and hundreds of thousands of Windows boxes

>> are. I also stand by my statement that, compared to Windows, Linux is

>> bulletproof. Calling me names and lying about me will not refute that.

>

> I stand by the fact that you are wrong.

 

Yes the only proof you offer is calling me a "crazy person".

> Also I have not insulted you, you just don't understand English.

 

See below.

> You can attempt to draw the conversation away from the fact that you are

> wrong if you want.. it is just a sign of you being childish.

 

You wrote, and I quote:

 

"I don't think anyone is going to take notice of a crazy person so you

may as well either tell the truth or go away."

 

--

Alias

To email me, remove shoes

On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 01:14:20 +0200, Alias <iamalias@shoesgmail.com>

wrote:

>dennis@home wrote:

>See below.

>

>> You can attempt to draw the conversation away from the fact that you are

>> wrong if you want.. it is just a sign of you being childish.

>

>You wrote, and I quote:

>

>"I don't think anyone is going to take notice of a crazy person so you

>may as well either tell the truth or go away."

 

After following this wacky newsgroup for about nine months I've come

to a conclusion. It's a magnet for newsgroup crazies. We got Jupiter

sitting on his throne pontificating, Frankie doing his I'm God's gift

to mankind act and now another blowhard named Dennis that denies he

said what he said even when shown his own quote. There's so many out

of control little boys here in their 30's, 40's and beyond it would

give any shrink years of intense interviews trying to unravel the

mess.

 

ROTFLAMO!

Adam Albright wrote:

> On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 01:14:20 +0200, Alias <iamalias@shoesgmail.com>

> wrote:

>

>

>>dennis@home wrote:

>

>

>>See below.

>>

>>

>>>You can attempt to draw the conversation away from the fact that you are

>>>wrong if you want.. it is just a sign of you being childish.

>>

>>You wrote, and I quote:

>>

>>"I don't think anyone is going to take notice of a crazy person so you

>>may as well either tell the truth or go away."

>

>

> After following this wacky newsgroup for about nine months I've come

> to a conclusion. It's a magnet for newsgroup crazies.

 

And you're the biggest one!

 

We got Jupiter

> sitting on his throne pontificating,

 

he's knows more than you'd know in a hundred lifetimes, you dispsh*t

drunken idiot!

 

Frankie doing his I'm God's gift

> to mankind act and now another blowhard named Dennis that denies he

> said what he said even when shown his own quote. There's so many out

> of control little boys here in their 30's, 40's and beyond it would

> give any shrink years of intense interviews trying to unravel the

> mess.

>

You're the laughing stock of this news group you fat bald drunken

pompous as*hole loser!

Frank

ROTFLAMO!

>

"Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

news:fcsagc$6kc$1@aioe.org...

> dennis@home wrote:

>>

>> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

>> news:fcqshr$30h$1@aioe.org...

>>> dennis@home wrote:

>>>>

>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

>>>> news:fcpm1d$18c$1@aioe.org...

>>>>> dennis@home wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

>>>>>> news:fcog3u$i7c$2@aioe.org...

>>>>>>> dennis@home wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

>>>>>>>> news:fco9d6$vvn$1@aioe.org...

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Fact: the only computers that are members of herd bots are Windows

>>>>>>>>> boxes. Live with it or wake up and go Open Source.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> You can say that as often as you like.. it doesn't make it true..

>>>>>>>> it just makes *you* sound crazy.

>>>>>>>> I don't think anyone is going to take notice of a crazy person so

>>>>>>>> you may as well either tell the truth or go away.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Ad hominem attacks are probably the most amateurish was of debating.

>>>>>>> I stand by what I said and you can't prove otherwise. Insulting me,

>>>>>>> btw, it not proving otherwise.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> That is not an insult.. it is a statement of fact.

>>>>>

>>>>> Calling me crazy isn't an insult?

>>>>

>>>> I didn't call you crazy.. you just don't/can't read.

>>>

>>> No you can't read. You called me crazy twice. See what you wrote above.

>>

>> Now you are showing an inability to understand English.

>> Maybe that is why you get confused about what you think you know.. you

>> just don't understand what is written?

>>

>>>>> What world do you live in?

>>>>

>>>> Not the same one as you by the stuff you claim to believe to be true.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>>> It is you that results to insults when you have lost the debate as it

>>>>>> is you that uses the other crude debating tactics in a vain attempt

>>>>>> to conceal your blatant ignorance.

>>>>>

>>>>> Fact:the only computers that are members of herd bots are Windows

>>>>> boxes. Live with it or wake up and go Open Source. Calling me crazy or

>>>>> saying I have crude debating tactics doesn't address this fact. It's

>>>>> an ad hominem attack, a very amateurish debating technique.

>>>>

>>>> Fact: You still don't understand even the basics of computing but are

>>>> prepared to claim to be an expert and advise others.. badly.

>>>> No amount of claiming others are insulting you when they aren't or

>>>> lying when they aren't is going to change the fact that you are

>>>> ignorant when it comes to computers. Listening and learning is the only

>>>> way you will improve and you don't appear to be capable of that.

>>>

>>> More unfounded insults. I stand by my statement that Linux boxes are not

>>> a part of herd bots and hundreds of thousands of Windows boxes are. I

>>> also stand by my statement that, compared to Windows, Linux is

>>> bulletproof. Calling me names and lying about me will not refute that.

>>

>> I stand by the fact that you are wrong.

>

> Yes the only proof you offer is calling me a "crazy person".

>

>> Also I have not insulted you, you just don't understand English.

>

> See below.

>

>> You can attempt to draw the conversation away from the fact that you are

>> wrong if you want.. it is just a sign of you being childish.

>

> You wrote, and I quote:

>

> "I don't think anyone is going to take notice of a crazy person so you may

> as well either tell the truth or go away."

 

Well if you actually quote all of it-

>>>>>>

 

You can say that as often as you like.. it doesn't make it true.. it just

makes *you* sound crazy.

I don't think anyone is going to take notice of a crazy person so you may as

well either tell the truth or go away.

 

 

<<<<<<<<<

 

Then it is obvious to anyone else that I didn't call you crazy and I

actually advised you to stop talking like you did as it made people think

you were crazy and therefore ignored what you said.

But as you can't understand simple English you got it wrong as you appear to

do with nearly everything.

This debate is pointless as I can't write any simpler English so you are

never going to understand.

Do you have a friend that can help you with your understanding or maybe a

different language that I may be able to write in?

"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

news:umo3f3p747g3vml8ft2d60l9hqn8pneq19@4ax.com...

> On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 01:14:20 +0200, Alias <iamalias@shoesgmail.com>

> wrote:

>

>>dennis@home wrote:

>

>>See below.

>>

>>> You can attempt to draw the conversation away from the fact that you are

>>> wrong if you want.. it is just a sign of you being childish.

>>

>>You wrote, and I quote:

>>

>>"I don't think anyone is going to take notice of a crazy person so you

>>may as well either tell the truth or go away."

>

> After following this wacky newsgroup for about nine months I've come

> to a conclusion. It's a magnet for newsgroup crazies. We got Jupiter

> sitting on his throne pontificating, Frankie doing his I'm God's gift

> to mankind act and now another blowhard named Dennis that denies he

> said what he said even when shown his own quote. There's so many out

> of control little boys here in their 30's, 40's and beyond it would

> give any shrink years of intense interviews trying to unravel the

> mess.

 

You are the same as alias.. you can't/don't bother to read what is said.

Then you half quote things to try and get out of the hole you have dug.

It appears that you and alias have a personality problem as you can't accept

that you are wrong.

Being unable to accept that you are wrong means that you cannot learn.

Being unable to learn means that anything you say is unreliable and that you

can be safely ignored without anyone worrying that they may miss something

of benefit.

On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 08:27:13 +0100, "dennis@home"

<dennis@killspam.kicks-ass.net> wrote:

>

>"Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

>news:fcsagc$6kc$1@aioe.org...

>> dennis@home wrote:

>>> I stand by the fact that you are wrong.

>>

>> Yes the only proof you offer is calling me a "crazy person".

>>

>>> Also I have not insulted you, you just don't understand English.

>>

>> See below.

>>

>>> You can attempt to draw the conversation away from the fact that you are

>>> wrong if you want.. it is just a sign of you being childish.

>>

>> You wrote, and I quote:

>>

>> "I don't think anyone is going to take notice of a crazy person so you may

>> as well either tell the truth or go away."

>

>Well if you actually quote all of it-

>

>>>>>>>

>

>You can say that as often as you like.. it doesn't make it true.. it just

>makes *you* sound crazy.

>I don't think anyone is going to take notice of a crazy person so you may as

>well either tell the truth or go away.

>

>

><<<<<<<<<

>

>Then it is obvious to anyone else that I didn't call you crazy and I

>actually advised you to stop talking like you did as it made people think

>you were crazy and therefore ignored what you said.

 

Speaking of SOUNDING crazy... it is becoming more obvious you are just

as psychotic as the newsgroup psychopath Frank. You say things then

first repeatedly deny you said them, then finally when painted into a

corner admit you did say it, then you attempt to parse your words

pretending we didn't understand what you meant. Yep, you're just

another nut job and you're not going to tap dance away from what you

said or meant.

>This debate is pointless as I can't write any simpler English so you are

>never going to understand.

 

This "debate" is important in that it establishes YOU as a liar and

apparent psycho. Now going forward no matter what you say it will be

highly suspect.

"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

news:aus4f31e2q31bafg7jbt636c7e4d40cvfo@4ax.com...

> On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 08:27:13 +0100, "dennis@home"

> <dennis@killspam.kicks-ass.net> wrote:

>

>>

>>"Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

>>news:fcsagc$6kc$1@aioe.org...

>>> dennis@home wrote:

>

>>>> I stand by the fact that you are wrong.

>>>

>>> Yes the only proof you offer is calling me a "crazy person".

>>>

>>>> Also I have not insulted you, you just don't understand English.

>>>

>>> See below.

>>>

>>>> You can attempt to draw the conversation away from the fact that you

>>>> are

>>>> wrong if you want.. it is just a sign of you being childish.

>>>

>>> You wrote, and I quote:

>>>

>>> "I don't think anyone is going to take notice of a crazy person so you

>>> may

>>> as well either tell the truth or go away."

>>

>>Well if you actually quote all of it-

>>

>>>>>>>>

>>

>>You can say that as often as you like.. it doesn't make it true.. it just

>>makes *you* sound crazy.

>>I don't think anyone is going to take notice of a crazy person so you may

>>as

>>well either tell the truth or go away.

>>

>>

>><<<<<<<<<

>>

>>Then it is obvious to anyone else that I didn't call you crazy and I

>>actually advised you to stop talking like you did as it made people think

>>you were crazy and therefore ignored what you said.

>

> Speaking of SOUNDING crazy... it is becoming more obvious you are just

> as psychotic as the newsgroup psychopath Frank. You say things then

> first repeatedly deny you said them, then finally when painted into a

> corner admit you did say it, then you attempt to parse your words

> pretending we didn't understand what you meant. Yep, you're just

> another nut job and you're not going to tap dance away from what you

> said or meant.

>

>>This debate is pointless as I can't write any simpler English so you are

>>never going to understand.

>

> This "debate" is important in that it establishes YOU as a liar and

> apparent psycho. Now going forward no matter what you say it will be

> highly suspect.

>

 

You really do have a problem with comprehension, have you tried evening

classes?

If I wanted to call alias crazy I would, it is of no consequence to me.

If I thought he was crazy I would try and contact the authorities to have

him treated.

Telling someone that they are talking crazy is friendly advice not an

accusation but I bet you can't understand that either.

On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 15:04:02 +0100, "dennis@home"

<dennis@killspam.kicks-ass.net> wrote:

>

>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

>news:aus4f31e2q31bafg7jbt636c7e4d40cvfo@4ax.com...

>> On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 08:27:13 +0100, "dennis@home"

>> <dennis@killspam.kicks-ass.net> wrote:

>>

>>>

>>>"Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

>>>news:fcsagc$6kc$1@aioe.org...

>>>> dennis@home wrote:

>>

>>>>> I stand by the fact that you are wrong.

>>>>

>>>> Yes the only proof you offer is calling me a "crazy person".

>>>>

>>>>> Also I have not insulted you, you just don't understand English.

>>>>

>>>> See below.

>>>>

>>>>> You can attempt to draw the conversation away from the fact that you

>>>>> are

>>>>> wrong if you want.. it is just a sign of you being childish.

>>>>

>>>> You wrote, and I quote:

>>>>

>>>> "I don't think anyone is going to take notice of a crazy person so you

>>>> may

>>>> as well either tell the truth or go away."

>>>

>>>Well if you actually quote all of it-

>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>

>>>You can say that as often as you like.. it doesn't make it true.. it just

>>>makes *you* sound crazy.

>>>I don't think anyone is going to take notice of a crazy person so you may

>>>as

>>>well either tell the truth or go away.

>>>

>>>

>>><<<<<<<<<

>>>

>>>Then it is obvious to anyone else that I didn't call you crazy and I

>>>actually advised you to stop talking like you did as it made people think

>>>you were crazy and therefore ignored what you said.

>>

>> Speaking of SOUNDING crazy... it is becoming more obvious you are just

>> as psychotic as the newsgroup psychopath Frank. You say things then

>> first repeatedly deny you said them, then finally when painted into a

>> corner admit you did say it, then you attempt to parse your words

>> pretending we didn't understand what you meant. Yep, you're just

>> another nut job and you're not going to tap dance away from what you

>> said or meant.

>>

>>>This debate is pointless as I can't write any simpler English so you are

>>>never going to understand.

>>

>> This "debate" is important in that it establishes YOU as a liar and

>> apparent psycho. Now going forward no matter what you say it will be

>> highly suspect.

>>

>

>You really do have a problem with comprehension, have you tried evening

>classes?

 

I have no trouble at all exposing crackpots like you.

>If I wanted to call alias crazy I would, it is of no consequence to me.

 

You did. Your repeated attempts to deny what you actually said only

confirms you are border line psycho at best.

>If I thought he was crazy I would try and contact the authorities to have

>him treated.

 

More proof you're not operating with a full deck of cards.

>Telling someone that they are talking crazy is friendly advice not an

>accusation but I bet you can't understand that either.

 

LOL! That's rich. Now you FINALLY admit you called Alias crazy and

since your original denial obviously isn't working you shift to trying

to say you only called him crazy in a "friendly" way.

 

Damn man, seek help. Don't walk, run to the nearly mental health

facility. You are border line psycho for sure.

Adam Albright wrote:

> On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 15:04:02 +0100, "dennis@home"

> <dennis@killspam.kicks-ass.net> wrote:

>

>

>>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

>>news:aus4f31e2q31bafg7jbt636c7e4d40cvfo@4ax.com...

>>

>>>On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 08:27:13 +0100, "dennis@home"

>>><dennis@killspam.kicks-ass.net> wrote:

>>>

>>>

>>>>"Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

>>>>news:fcsagc$6kc$1@aioe.org...

>>>>

>>>>>dennis@home wrote:

>>>

>>>>>>I stand by the fact that you are wrong.

>>>>>

>>>>>Yes the only proof you offer is calling me a "crazy person".

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>>Also I have not insulted you, you just don't understand English.

>>>>>

>>>>>See below.

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>>You can attempt to draw the conversation away from the fact that you

>>>>>>are

>>>>>>wrong if you want.. it is just a sign of you being childish.

>>>>>

>>>>>You wrote, and I quote:

>>>>>

>>>>>"I don't think anyone is going to take notice of a crazy person so you

>>>>>may

>>>>>as well either tell the truth or go away."

>>>>

>>>>Well if you actually quote all of it-

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>You can say that as often as you like.. it doesn't make it true.. it just

>>>>makes *you* sound crazy.

>>>>I don't think anyone is going to take notice of a crazy person so you may

>>>>as

>>>>well either tell the truth or go away.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>><<<<<<<<<

>>>>

>>>>Then it is obvious to anyone else that I didn't call you crazy and I

>>>>actually advised you to stop talking like you did as it made people think

>>>>you were crazy and therefore ignored what you said.

>>>

>>>Speaking of SOUNDING crazy... it is becoming more obvious you are just

>>>as psychotic as the newsgroup psychopath Frank. You say things then

>>>first repeatedly deny you said them, then finally when painted into a

>>>corner admit you did say it, then you attempt to parse your words

>>>pretending we didn't understand what you meant. Yep, you're just

>>>another nut job and you're not going to tap dance away from what you

>>>said or meant.

>>>

>>>

>>>>This debate is pointless as I can't write any simpler English so you are

>>>>never going to understand.

>>>

>>>This "debate" is important in that it establishes YOU as a liar and

>>>apparent psycho. Now going forward no matter what you say it will be

>>>highly suspect.

>>>

>>

>>You really do have a problem with comprehension, have you tried evening

>>classes?

>

>

> I have no trouble at all exposing crackpots like you.

>

>

>>If I wanted to call alias crazy I would, it is of no consequence to me.

>

>

> You did. Your repeated attempts to deny what you actually said only

> confirms you are border line psycho at best.

>

>

>>If I thought he was crazy I would try and contact the authorities to have

>>him treated.

>

>

> More proof you're not operating with a full deck of cards.

>

>

>>Telling someone that they are talking crazy is friendly advice not an

>>accusation but I bet you can't understand that either.

>

>

> LOL! That's rich. Now you FINALLY admit you called Alias crazy and

> since your original denial obviously isn't working you shift to trying

> to say you only called him crazy in a "friendly" way.

>

> Damn man, seek help. Don't walk, run to the nearly mental health

> facility. You are border line psycho for sure.

>

 

 

Adam, you need to get a real life. Obviously, from your postings, you've

got some real mental problems that seriously impair your ability to

think clearly.

We've all noticed this from day one about you.

Get some real help, ok?

Just friendly advice from concerned posters.

Frank

"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

news:1m05f39fv7el5pp2flsn43oe5vgk13bgnu@4ax.com...

> On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 15:04:02 +0100, "dennis@home"

> <dennis@killspam.kicks-ass.net> wrote:

>

>>

>>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

>>news:aus4f31e2q31bafg7jbt636c7e4d40cvfo@4ax.com...

>>> On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 08:27:13 +0100, "dennis@home"

>>> <dennis@killspam.kicks-ass.net> wrote:

>>>

>>>>

>>>>"Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

>>>>news:fcsagc$6kc$1@aioe.org...

>>>>> dennis@home wrote:

>>>

>>>>>> I stand by the fact that you are wrong.

>>>>>

>>>>> Yes the only proof you offer is calling me a "crazy person".

>>>>>

>>>>>> Also I have not insulted you, you just don't understand English.

>>>>>

>>>>> See below.

>>>>>

>>>>>> You can attempt to draw the conversation away from the fact that you

>>>>>> are

>>>>>> wrong if you want.. it is just a sign of you being childish.

>>>>>

>>>>> You wrote, and I quote:

>>>>>

>>>>> "I don't think anyone is going to take notice of a crazy person so you

>>>>> may

>>>>> as well either tell the truth or go away."

>>>>

>>>>Well if you actually quote all of it-

>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>

>>>>You can say that as often as you like.. it doesn't make it true.. it

>>>>just

>>>>makes *you* sound crazy.

>>>>I don't think anyone is going to take notice of a crazy person so you

>>>>may

>>>>as

>>>>well either tell the truth or go away.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>><<<<<<<<<

>>>>

>>>>Then it is obvious to anyone else that I didn't call you crazy and I

>>>>actually advised you to stop talking like you did as it made people

>>>>think

>>>>you were crazy and therefore ignored what you said.

>>>

>>> Speaking of SOUNDING crazy... it is becoming more obvious you are just

>>> as psychotic as the newsgroup psychopath Frank. You say things then

>>> first repeatedly deny you said them, then finally when painted into a

>>> corner admit you did say it, then you attempt to parse your words

>>> pretending we didn't understand what you meant. Yep, you're just

>>> another nut job and you're not going to tap dance away from what you

>>> said or meant.

>>>

>>>>This debate is pointless as I can't write any simpler English so you are

>>>>never going to understand.

>>>

>>> This "debate" is important in that it establishes YOU as a liar and

>>> apparent psycho. Now going forward no matter what you say it will be

>>> highly suspect.

>>>

>>

>>You really do have a problem with comprehension, have you tried evening

>>classes?

>

> I have no trouble at all exposing crackpots like you.

>

>>If I wanted to call alias crazy I would, it is of no consequence to me.

>

> You did. Your repeated attempts to deny what you actually said only

> confirms you are border line psycho at best.

>

>>If I thought he was crazy I would try and contact the authorities to have

>>him treated.

>

> More proof you're not operating with a full deck of cards.

>

>>Telling someone that they are talking crazy is friendly advice not an

>>accusation but I bet you can't understand that either.

>

> LOL! That's rich. Now you FINALLY admit you called Alias crazy and

> since your original denial obviously isn't working you shift to trying

> to say you only called him crazy in a "friendly" way.

 

There is nothing to admit on my part.

It is you that lacks the comprehension to understand no matter how simple it

is put.

>

> Damn man, seek help. Don't walk, run to the nearly mental health

> facility. You are border line psycho for sure.

>

 

Now more insults.. you really are desperate trying to persuade people that I

have said something that I have not even though the evidence is all there in

black and green.

On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 19:06:10 +0100, "dennis@home"

<dennis@killspam.kicks-ass.net> wrote:

>

>>>Telling someone that they are talking crazy is friendly advice not an

>>>accusation but I bet you can't understand that either.

>>

>> LOL! That's rich. Now you FINALLY admit you called Alias crazy and

>> since your original denial obviously isn't working you shift to trying

>> to say you only called him crazy in a "friendly" way.

>

>There is nothing to admit on my part.

>It is you that lacks the comprehension to understand no matter how simple it

>is put.

 

Comprehension isn't required. Only being able to read English. Stop

making feeble excuses for your poor conduct. You called Alias crazy.

Own up to it or be seen as a sniveling coward. Your choice.

>

>>

>> Damn man, seek help. Don't walk, run to the nearly mental health

>> facility. You are border line psycho for sure.

>>

>

>Now more insults.

 

Not insults, FACTS. You lied, first pretending you didn't say what you

said, then you attempted to make excuses for what you said. That is

the very essence of delusional behavior or just being a pathological

liar. Maybe you would prefer that label. Take your pick.

>you really are desperate trying to persuade people that I

>have said something that I have not even though the evidence is all there in

>black and green.

 

You're still in denial. Another sign of a delusional mental state.

What you said is clear. You accused Alias of being crazy. Now you are

desperate to try to parse what you said.

 

Your conduct was totally uncalled for since Alias seems to be one of

the more rational posters. Never mind he's passionate about Linux,

which many here hold against him. So what, a lot of "crazies" here are

far more passionate about Vista. The difference is Alias doesn't fly

off the handle or rant and rave like some loons here always do.

 

While Alias and I disagree on several things none the less we can

respect each other and still have a normal conversation. Something the

fanboy crowd rarely is capable of.

"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

news:m7n5f31ioomt1skmqn8jkb12n800dpb1i5@4ax.com...

> On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 19:06:10 +0100, "dennis@home"

> <dennis@killspam.kicks-ass.net> wrote:

>

>>

>>>>Telling someone that they are talking crazy is friendly advice not an

>>>>accusation but I bet you can't understand that either.

>>>

>>> LOL! That's rich. Now you FINALLY admit you called Alias crazy and

>>> since your original denial obviously isn't working you shift to trying

>>> to say you only called him crazy in a "friendly" way.

>>

>>There is nothing to admit on my part.

>>It is you that lacks the comprehension to understand no matter how simple

>>it

>>is put.

>

> Comprehension isn't required. Only being able to read English. Stop

> making feeble excuses for your poor conduct. You called Alias crazy.

> Own up to it or be seen as a sniveling coward. Your choice.

>>

>>>

>>> Damn man, seek help. Don't walk, run to the nearly mental health

>>> facility. You are border line psycho for sure.

>>>

>>

>>Now more insults.

>

> Not insults, FACTS. You lied, first pretending you didn't say what you

> said, then you attempted to make excuses for what you said. That is

> the very essence of delusional behavior or just being a pathological

> liar. Maybe you would prefer that label. Take your pick.

>

>>you really are desperate trying to persuade people that I

>>have said something that I have not even though the evidence is all there

>>in

>>black and green.

>

> You're still in denial. Another sign of a delusional mental state.

> What you said is clear. You accused Alias of being crazy. Now you are

> desperate to try to parse what you said.

>

> Your conduct was totally uncalled for since Alias seems to be one of

> the more rational posters. Never mind he's passionate about Linux,

> which many here hold against him. So what, a lot of "crazies" here are

> far more passionate about Vista. The difference is Alias doesn't fly

> off the handle or rant and rave like some loons here always do.

>

> While Alias and I disagree on several things none the less we can

> respect each other and still have a normal conversation. Something the

> fanboy crowd rarely is capable of.

>

 

You are being stupid.

Note: that doesn't say you are stupid just in case you are stupid and can't

understand.

 

BTW why do you have this fixation on a fanboy crowd?

Isn't it something of your own creation?

Alias wrote:

> Charlie Tame wrote:

>> dennis@home wrote:

>>>

>>> "Erwin Moller"

>>> <Since_humans_read_this_I_am_spammed_too_much@spamyourself.com> wrote

>>> in message news:46eeaa68$0$227$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl...

>>>

>>>> So lets focus on the argument, and simply not take each other word

>>>> for it.

>>>

>>> There is no argument..

>>> you have the view that because the code is public lots of people will

>>> read it, understand it, and make sure its safe.

>>> I say they can't/don't do that and have offered evidence that backs

>>> my view.

>>> Until you have some actual evidence the argument is finished.

>>

>>

>> Just a quick scan before giving up for the night and a happened to

>> find this post :)

>>

>> Have to say Dennis that is something I've always said...

>>

>> Why, unless working on a section of it currently, would anyone sit and

>> wade through the code for (say) a Linux Kernel?

>>

>> Surely you would modify the bit you were working on and compile the

>> whole thing again... thus recompiling something that may be incorrect

>> or even malicious that sneaked in before. I mean I know this

>> "Shouldn't" happen but that does not equate to "Couldn't" happen, and

>> it seems to me that risk is somewhat dependent on such things as a

>> strict version control system.

>>

>> Considering that there are many more independent "Fingers in the pie"

>> than there are with (Say) Sun or Microsoft I don't think you can make

>> a straight comparison between open and closed code. There's no

>> doubting that errors still happen.

>

> Yeah, but Windows boxes have been proven to be more virus prone and

> Windows boxes are the only boxes that are members of herd bots that send

> us all the spam. You are talking about a theoretical possibility when,

> in reality, Windows boxes are the ones spreading crap all over the

> Internet, not Linux boxes. Proof is in the pudding and all that jazz.

>

> The fact that preinstalled Windows boxes that come from the likes of

> Dell and HP are bundled with trial crap should tell you how much the

> large computer vendors care about their customers.

>

 

 

Actually I made a careless mistake a few months back leaving a mail

server "Open Relay" for a few minutes while making some settings changes

(Simply didn't notice it had started up) and it was put to use

immediately, which considering the time is was up and running might

surprise you. That was Debian. Absolutely nothing to do with the

software or the OS, entirely my own fault.

 

I agree that many MS defaults were badly designed, better to make it not

work and have people turn it on that have it all on and nobody aware

enough to notice, and even some that are aware make mistakes like I did,

so yes "Windows" has been responsible for some problems, however MS have

improved their defaults and now user problems are a large part of it,

either because they have older installs with no updates or just simply

lack knowledge. If you really want these people to leave Windows and

join Linux than you have to expect the Windows Vs Linux argument to

become Windows users Vs Linux users.

On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 22:25:25 +0100, "dennis@home"

<dennis@killspam.kicks-ass.net> wrote:

>

>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

>> Comprehension isn't required. Only being able to read English. Stop

>> making feeble excuses for your poor conduct. You called Alias crazy.

>> Own up to it or be seen as a sniveling coward. Your choice.

>>>

>>>>

>>>> Damn man, seek help. Don't walk, run to the nearly mental health

>>>> facility. You are border line psycho for sure.

>>>>

>>>

>>>Now more insults.

>>

>> Not insults, FACTS. You lied, first pretending you didn't say what you

>> said, then you attempted to make excuses for what you said. That is

>> the very essence of delusional behavior or just being a pathological

>> liar. Maybe you would prefer that label. Take your pick.

>>

>>>you really are desperate trying to persuade people that I

>>>have said something that I have not even though the evidence is all there

>>>in

>>>black and green.

>>

>> You're still in denial. Another sign of a delusional mental state.

>> What you said is clear. You accused Alias of being crazy. Now you are

>> desperate to try to parse what you said.

>>

>> Your conduct was totally uncalled for since Alias seems to be one of

>> the more rational posters. Never mind he's passionate about Linux,

>> which many here hold against him. So what, a lot of "crazies" here are

>> far more passionate about Vista. The difference is Alias doesn't fly

>> off the handle or rant and rave like some loons here always do.

>>

>> While Alias and I disagree on several things none the less we can

>> respect each other and still have a normal conversation. Something the

>> fanboy crowd rarely is capable of.

>>

>

>You are being stupid.

 

Oh I see, this must be another of your comments where you don't mean

what you're saying I'm just confused, right?

>Note: that doesn't say you are stupid just in case you are stupid and can't

>understand.

 

You're right on cue. I understand you perfectly. You think you can

insult people, then deny you insulted them then go on pretending when

you call someone crazy or stupid you're just playing or we don't

understand what you really meant. Got it.

>

>BTW why do you have this fixation on a fanboy crowd?

 

No fixation, just an observation how most of the crazies here act

alike. You're no exception. Want me to explain it to you in still

simpler terms?

>Isn't it something of your own creation?

 

Now you're confusing me with the village idiot Frank. It creates

things out of his fantasy world. His latest creation is he's a WWII

vet. That makes him pushing 90. You won't have to wait long for him to

say oh, I didn't meant that and like you pretend he didn't understand

to imply he served in WWII, he just got WWII benefits. Sure right.