On Sun, 09 Sep 2007 10:30:42 -0700, Frank <fb@nospan.crm> wrote:

>Adam Albright wrote:

>> Feature: ===> some JPEG files get corrupted when moving from certain

>> cameras.

>

>Really? We handle tons of JPEG's in our daily business from multiple

>cameras and have never had such a problem.

 

Your above comments more than anything demonstrates your level of

intelligence or more accurately lack of same. You being the total

fool, make the absurd assumption that what YOU alone experience is

shared by the countless tens of millions of others also using Vista.

This problem, like the others I mentioned have been reported far and

wide by many users. You of course just blow them off because it is

impossible for a butt kissing Microsoft apologist like to admit Vista

has flaws even after Microsoft admits it themselves.

 

You got to be a special kind of idiot to think that stupidly, but hey,

you Frank have proved beyond all doubt that is indeed how you "think".

If Frank doesn't experience it himself, then it doesn't exist. He's

said that countless times and little Frankie numbnuts is sticking with

his position.

 

ROTFLAMO!

On Sun, 09 Sep 2007 10:36:45 -0700, Frank <fb@nospan.crm> wrote:

>Adam Albright wrote:

>

>>

>>

>> You can judge the relative intelligence of a poster by how often they

>> find it necessary to announce they plonked somebody which to any long

>> time user of newsgroups is the equivalent of the Bozo holding up a

>> sign that's reads "Hey world, I'm just an idiot, ignore me."

>>

>

>You're the idiot! He's pulling your strings and pushing your buttons and

>you're reacting each and every time!

>Dance for us adam...lol!

>Frank

 

Accepting your "logic" since you insist on responding to every post I

make, I guess I sure know how to push your buttons. I do of course as

you insist on proving day after day.

 

ROTFLMAO!

"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

news:kr78e3pg1i137hh9bnj24be3m8afi1f4j3@4ax.com...

> Does it really matter?

>

 

Only as much as it appears anything alias and much of what others say.. is

wrong.

It doesn't actually matter at all.

However his constant lies that encourage people to switch to Linux for the

wrong reasons do matter both to Linux users who understand what they are

doing and have to take the flack and to the poor unsuspecting user that

takes the advice.

Adam Albright wrote:

> Your above comments more than anything demonstrates your level of

> intelligence or more accurately lack of same. You being the total

> fool, make the absurd assumption that what YOU alone experience is

> shared by the countless tens of millions of others also using Vista.

> This problem, like the others I mentioned have been reported far and

> wide by many users. You of course just blow them off because it is

> impossible for a butt kissing Microsoft apologist like to admit Vista

> has flaws even after Microsoft admits it themselves.

 

Is that the best you can do?

That's pathetic...just like you.

>

> You got to be a special kind of idiot to think that stupidly, but hey,

> you Frank have proved beyond all doubt that is indeed how you "think".

> If Frank doesn't experience it himself, then it doesn't exist. He's

> said that countless times and little Frankie numbnuts is sticking with

> his position.

 

Hey mr computer expert...hahaha...yeah, right...ever get that one little

in place install of Vista business to run correctly?

Huh?

Hey, you low life excuse for a human being, I've got 9...count'em...9

installs of Vista Ultimate to run correctly.

Now, who's the fukkin idiot?

Well...hahaha...got screw yourself mr genius.

Frank

ROTFLAMO!

>

Adam Albright wrote:

> On Sun, 09 Sep 2007 10:36:45 -0700, Frank <fb@nospan.crm> wrote:

>

>

>>Adam Albright wrote:

>>

>>

>>>

>>>You can judge the relative intelligence of a poster by how often they

>>>find it necessary to announce they plonked somebody which to any long

>>>time user of newsgroups is the equivalent of the Bozo holding up a

>>>sign that's reads "Hey world, I'm just an idiot, ignore me."

>>>

>>

>>You're the idiot! He's pulling your strings and pushing your buttons and

>>you're reacting each and every time!

>>Dance for us adam...lol!

>>Frank

>

>

> Accepting your "logic" since you insist on responding to every post I

> make, I guess I sure know how to push your buttons. I do of course as

> you insist on proving day after day.

>

> ROTFLMAO!

>

 

hehehe...we're all kickin your fat stupid ass and you like it!

Frank

On Sun, 9 Sep 2007 20:49:57 +0100, "dennis@home"

<dennis@killspam.kicks-ass.net> wrote:

>

>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

>news:kr78e3pg1i137hh9bnj24be3m8afi1f4j3@4ax.com...

>

>> Does it really matter?

>>

>

>Only as much as it appears anything alias and much of what others say.. is

>wrong.

 

Wow, that's mighty judgmental. I could make a list and it would be a

damn long one of all the wrong things fanboys and MVPs have said here

in the last nine months.

 

>It doesn't actually matter at all.

>However his constant lies that encourage people to switch to Linux for the

>wrong reasons do matter both to Linux users who understand what they are

>doing and have to take the flack and to the poor unsuspecting user that

>takes the advice.

 

What about the lies about Vista and all the rest of the crap that

routinely gets posted here that is BS? How come you're not bitching

about that?

 

For somebody that just joined the group you seem to have an

excessively high opinion of yourself and what you claim to know.

Sorry, not impressed.

Adam Albright wrote:

> On Sun, 9 Sep 2007 20:49:57 +0100, "dennis@home"

> <dennis@killspam.kicks-ass.net> wrote:

>

>

>>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

>>news:kr78e3pg1i137hh9bnj24be3m8afi1f4j3@4ax.com...

>>

>>

>>>Does it really matter?

>>>

>>

>>Only as much as it appears anything alias and much of what others say.. is

>>wrong.

>

>

> Wow, that's mighty judgmental. I could make a list and it would be a

> damn long one of all the wrong things fanboys and MVPs have said here

> in the last nine months.

>

>

>

>>It doesn't actually matter at all.

>>However his constant lies that encourage people to switch to Linux for the

>>wrong reasons do matter both to Linux users who understand what they are

>>doing and have to take the flack and to the poor unsuspecting user that

>>takes the advice.

>

>

> What about the lies about Vista and all the rest of the crap that

> routinely gets posted here that is BS? How come you're not bitching

> about that?

>

> For somebody that just joined the group you seem to have an

> excessively high opinion of yourself and what you claim to know.

> Sorry, not impressed.

>

 

You're a lying sack of sh*t!

Frank

"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

news:k8l8e39ed1k058m7ggs9ii4k6esn752mum@4ax.com...

> On Sun, 9 Sep 2007 20:49:57 +0100, "dennis@home"

> <dennis@killspam.kicks-ass.net> wrote:

>

>>

>>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

>>news:kr78e3pg1i137hh9bnj24be3m8afi1f4j3@4ax.com...

>>

>>> Does it really matter?

>>>

>>

>>Only as much as it appears anything alias and much of what others say.. is

>>wrong.

>

> Wow, that's mighty judgmental. I could make a list and it would be a

> damn long one of all the wrong things fanboys and MVPs have said here

> in the last nine months.

 

What has that got to do with it?

Even if its true, which I don't know, it has nothing to do with this.

You may think there is some kind of contest to see who can come up with the

biggest lie but I don't.

 

>>It doesn't actually matter at all.

>>However his constant lies that encourage people to switch to Linux for the

>>wrong reasons do matter both to Linux users who understand what they are

>>doing and have to take the flack and to the poor unsuspecting user that

>>takes the advice.

>

> What about the lies about Vista and all the rest of the crap that

> routinely gets posted here that is BS? How come you're not bitching

> about that?

 

Probably because I don't know if its true.

I have yet to become an expert on Vista and I wouldn't call myself an expert

on Linux either but its apparant that I know more than a lot of advocates

and experts here.

>

> For somebody that just joined the group you seem to have an

> excessively high opinion of yourself and what you claim to know.

 

You are deluding yourself.

> Sorry, not impressed.

>

 

Do you think I am impressed by you?

Adam Albright wrote:

 

<snipped the Albright BS>

 

<Do yourself a real favor and ignore Albright. As you can see, he tries

to belittle and attack everyone in the NG that doesn't kiss his behind

or doesn't agree with him. I suggest that you sit back, watch, and

follow him. You'll see that he is nothing but a *troll* that should be

kick to the curb by you.>

dennis@home wrote:

 

<snipped Albright's BS>

>

>

> Do you think I am impressed by you?

 

 

<You are dealing with a NG troll. You should cut him loose and not

respond to him as most have done. Only his posse approves of him, which

you'll see him in commutations with them. You can't miss them. You

should cut them a loose too.>

I am well aware of that link.

I am also aware of the fact Microsoft sometimes extends the lifecycle

as they recently did with Windows XP Home.

 

--

Jupiter Jones [MVP]

http://www3.telus.net/dandemar

http://www.dts-l.org

 

 

"Kayman" <kayhkay~nospam~@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:e2qgTBo8HHA.1212@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

> http://support.microsoft.com/lifecycle/?p1=3223

Depending on how you limited your selection determined if you had a

choice.

Laptops and desktops are still available with windows XP.

 

--

Jupiter Jones [MVP]

http://www3.telus.net/dandemar

http://www.dts-l.org

 

 

"AP" <gdvert@earthlink.net> wrote in message

news:1189299325.056010.319700@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...

> I got Vista with a new laptop. I had no choice.

>

> Now my choice is between buying a new printer, buying

> XP to replace Vista or waiting for the fix while

> moving files to another computer to be printed.

> (I can print only the first page of the text).

>

On Sun, 9 Sep 2007 22:00:19 +0100, "dennis@home"

<dennis@killspam.kicks-ass.net> wrote:

>

>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

>news:k8l8e39ed1k058m7ggs9ii4k6esn752mum@4ax.com...

>> On Sun, 9 Sep 2007 20:49:57 +0100, "dennis@home"

>> <dennis@killspam.kicks-ass.net> wrote:

>>

>>>

>>>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

>>>news:kr78e3pg1i137hh9bnj24be3m8afi1f4j3@4ax.com...

>>>

>>>> Does it really matter?

>>>>

>>>

>>>Only as much as it appears anything alias and much of what others say.. is

>>>wrong.

>>

>> Wow, that's mighty judgmental. I could make a list and it would be a

>> damn long one of all the wrong things fanboys and MVPs have said here

>> in the last nine months.

>

>What has that got to do with it?

 

You're pandering to ONE side. While Alias and others may be a bit over

the top in praising Linux, there are even more praising Vista, simply

because they don't know any better. Ever since I first visited this

newsgroup about nine months ago there has always been non stop banter

back and forth. A little of that is normal in many newsgroups. Here

there are obviously a few hot headed fools that are rabid in their

blind devotion to Microsoft so they don't see clearly. I don't even

have to mention who the worst case is, everyone knows what PUTZ I

mean. He's that big an idiot and the cause of 90% of the noise.

>Even if its true, which I don't know, it has nothing to do with this.

>You may think there is some kind of contest to see who can come up with the

>biggest lie but I don't.

 

The biggest thing I see wrong with this newsgroup is too many blindly

ignore all that's wrong with Vista trying to sweep problems under the

rug rather than openly discussing them. How does that help anybody

having real problems? The irony is for some so-called "support"

newsgroup, this one sucks big time. That's an honest assessment of the

silly happenings here. Talk about shooting the messenger. Too many

here simply don't want to hear about Vista problems. They prefer to

live in never never land and seem to enjoy pretending everything is

peachy.

>>>It doesn't actually matter at all.

>>>However his constant lies that encourage people to switch to Linux for the

>>>wrong reasons do matter both to Linux users who understand what they are

>>>doing and have to take the flack and to the poor unsuspecting user that

>>>takes the advice.

>>

>> What about the lies about Vista and all the rest of the crap that

>> routinely gets posted here that is BS? How come you're not bitching

>> about that?

>

>Probably because I don't know if its true.

 

So maybe you should educate yourself to what's been going on here for

months before you jump to conclusions and pick sides. Hint: You're

supporting the wrong camp.

>I have yet to become an expert on Vista and I wouldn't call myself an expert

>on Linux either but its apparant that I know more than a lot of advocates

>and experts here.

 

Heck, everybody more or less seems to claim the same thing. Fancy

that. Again, typical in newsgroups. I've seen it all before. Many,

many times. Everybody the expert. LOL!

>> For somebody that just joined the group you seem to have an

>> excessively high opinion of yourself and what you claim to know.

>

>You are deluding yourself.

 

Hardly. I've watched newsgroups and the weird characters attracted to

them for over 20 years. Easy to spot common flaws in posters. You are

what you are.

>

>> Sorry, not impressed.

>>

>

>Do you think I am impressed by you?

 

I couldn't care less if you are or not. See that's the difference. A

lot of dopes are out to obviously try to impress others with what they

pretend to know. I don't have to impress anybody. I can truly say I've

been there, done that, and that was over two decades ago, while some

of the current "experts" were barely out of pooping in their pampers.

I'm simply watching the parade of fakers march past. Like I've said,

see it all before. What can I say, goofy hobby, yes, but damn it has

it's moments. You may not know it, but in your own weird way you are

entertaining me. Thanks. :-)

On Sun, 09 Sep 2007 13:39:36 -0700, Frank <fb@nospan.crm> wrote:

>Adam Albright wrote:

>

>> On Sun, 9 Sep 2007 20:49:57 +0100, "dennis@home"

>> <dennis@killspam.kicks-ass.net> wrote:

>>

>>

>>>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

>>>news:kr78e3pg1i137hh9bnj24be3m8afi1f4j3@4ax.com...

>>>

>>>

>>>>Does it really matter?

>>>>

>>>

>>>Only as much as it appears anything alias and much of what others say.. is

>>>wrong.

>>

>>

>> Wow, that's mighty judgmental. I could make a list and it would be a

>> damn long one of all the wrong things fanboys and MVPs have said here

>> in the last nine months.

>>

>>

>>

>>>It doesn't actually matter at all.

>>>However his constant lies that encourage people to switch to Linux for the

>>>wrong reasons do matter both to Linux users who understand what they are

>>>doing and have to take the flack and to the poor unsuspecting user that

>>>takes the advice.

>>

>>

>> What about the lies about Vista and all the rest of the crap that

>> routinely gets posted here that is BS? How come you're not bitching

>> about that?

>>

>> For somebody that just joined the group you seem to have an

>> excessively high opinion of yourself and what you claim to know.

>> Sorry, not impressed.

>>

>

>You're a lying sack of sh*t!

>Frank

 

You are obviously demented.

Adam Albright wrote:

>> Do you think I am impressed by you?

 

<snipped the Albright BS>

>

> I couldn't care less if you are or not. See that's the difference. A

> lot of dopes are out to obviously try to impress others with what they

> pretend to know. I don't have to impress anybody. I can truly say I've

> been there, done that, and that was over two decades ago, while some

> of the current "experts" were barely out of pooping in their pampers.

> I'm simply watching the parade of fakers march past. Like I've said,

> see it all before. What can I say, goofy hobby, yes, but damn it has

> it's moments. You may not know it, but in your own weird way you are

> entertaining me. Thanks. :-)

>

 

<Does anything else need to be said about a male that is 50 something

years old that can't act like a grown man? Don't you see that this

person has some mental issues?>

 

<How long has this *clown* been doing this on the Internet you may ask?

I'll tell you. He has been loose out here on the Internet acting like an

old fool for 20 some years according to him with his mental breakdown.>

 

<Don't let him fool you, because he just happens to be in this NG with

his mental illness. One suspects he has been in several NG(s) with his

mental disease over the years. This NG just happens to be the latest one

he has squatted in trolling. He tries to impress the *audience* as he

puts it. BUT THERE IS NO *AUDIENCE*, and it's all in his ill mind. <g>>

In article <OilmI3l8HHA.484@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl>,

<msnews.microsoft.com> says...

> I am currently running XP MCE SP2 without any problems at all. AMD 64bit

> 3200, 2 GB RAM, nVidia 6600 GT Video, 250 GB SATA HD. Hauppauge tuner card.

> Vista upgrade advisor says everything is supported and all device and apps

> are fine. My typical work is in SQL Server 2005, VStudio 2005 and Office

> 2007. I use Media Centre occasionally. I am wondering if it is actually

> worth upgrading to Ultimate. I have read about a lot of issues... it

> doesn't seem that many peole are very happy with Vista. Any feedback?

 

Unless you have 256MB or 512MB on the video card and are willing to put

up with a machine that will be slower, there is no reason to upgrade.

 

I personally use SQL 2000/2005 and VS on my computers, and I'm about to

switch back from office 2007 to Office 2003 because of Office

performance issues. I don't like and find the performance of Vista to be

very lacking.

 

If you can stick with MCE or XP Prof, then do so - you could also

consider Server 2003 Standard if you can live without the MCE junk.

Server 2003 runs very well on your hardware.

 

--

 

Leythos

- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.

- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a

drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"

spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)

"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

news:d8r8e398udglintnsb6d6sqfgan5o8fu06@4ax.com...

> On Sun, 9 Sep 2007 22:00:19 +0100, "dennis@home"

> <dennis@killspam.kicks-ass.net> wrote:

>

>>

>>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

>>news:k8l8e39ed1k058m7ggs9ii4k6esn752mum@4ax.com...

>>> On Sun, 9 Sep 2007 20:49:57 +0100, "dennis@home"

>>> <dennis@killspam.kicks-ass.net> wrote:

>>>

>>>>

>>>>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

>>>>news:kr78e3pg1i137hh9bnj24be3m8afi1f4j3@4ax.com...

>>>>

>>>>> Does it really matter?

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>>Only as much as it appears anything alias and much of what others say..

>>>>is

>>>>wrong.

>>>

>>> Wow, that's mighty judgmental. I could make a list and it would be a

>>> damn long one of all the wrong things fanboys and MVPs have said here

>>> in the last nine months.

>>

>>What has that got to do with it?

>

> You're pandering to ONE side. While Alias and others may be a bit over

> the top in praising Linux, there are even more praising Vista, simply

> because they don't know any better. Ever since I first visited this

> newsgroup about nine months ago there has always been non stop banter

> back and forth. A little of that is normal in many newsgroups. Here

> there are obviously a few hot headed fools that are rabid in their

> blind devotion to Microsoft so they don't see clearly. I don't even

> have to mention who the worst case is, everyone knows what PUTZ I

> mean. He's that big an idiot and the cause of 90% of the noise.

>

>>Even if its true, which I don't know, it has nothing to do with this.

>>You may think there is some kind of contest to see who can come up with

>>the

>>biggest lie but I don't.

>

> The biggest thing I see wrong with this newsgroup is too many blindly

> ignore all that's wrong with Vista trying to sweep problems under the

> rug rather than openly discussing them. How does that help anybody

> having real problems? The irony is for some so-called "support"

> newsgroup, this one sucks big time. That's an honest assessment of the

> silly happenings here. Talk about shooting the messenger. Too many

> here simply don't want to hear about Vista problems. They prefer to

> live in never never land and seem to enjoy pretending everything is

> peachy.

 

As I see it you get three types here:-

 

A: Those with Vista with a serious problem looking for a solution.

 

B: Those without Vista, without a solution looking for a problem and those

without windows looking for a problem.

 

C: Those like me who dropped in with a minor problem and are still waiting

to see if a solution appears.

 

You and alias and a few others are in catagory B and are of no use at all to

people in categories A or C who already have Vista and don't want to

uninstal it and replace it with something else at this time. If I did want

to install XP then I would ask in an XP news group how to do it, likewise I

would in a Linux news group if I wanted Linux so people that want to get rid

of Vista shouldn't really be here at all as installing something else isn't

a Vista problem.

>

>>>>It doesn't actually matter at all.

>>>>However his constant lies that encourage people to switch to Linux for

>>>>the

>>>>wrong reasons do matter both to Linux users who understand what they are

>>>>doing and have to take the flack and to the poor unsuspecting user that

>>>>takes the advice.

>>>

>>> What about the lies about Vista and all the rest of the crap that

>>> routinely gets posted here that is BS? How come you're not bitching

>>> about that?

>>

>>Probably because I don't know if its true.

>

> So maybe you should educate yourself to what's been going on here for

> months before you jump to conclusions and pick sides. Hint: You're

> supporting the wrong camp.

>

>>I have yet to become an expert on Vista and I wouldn't call myself an

>>expert

>>on Linux either but its apparant that I know more than a lot of advocates

>>and experts here.

>

> Heck, everybody more or less seems to claim the same thing. Fancy

> that. Again, typical in newsgroups. I've seen it all before. Many,

> many times. Everybody the expert. LOL!

>

>>> For somebody that just joined the group you seem to have an

>>> excessively high opinion of yourself and what you claim to know.

>>

>>You are deluding yourself.

>

> Hardly. I've watched newsgroups and the weird characters attracted to

> them for over 20 years. Easy to spot common flaws in posters. You are

> what you are.

>>

>>> Sorry, not impressed.

>>>

>>

>>Do you think I am impressed by you?

>

> I couldn't care less if you are or not. See that's the difference. A

> lot of dopes are out to obviously try to impress others with what they

> pretend to know. I don't have to impress anybody. I can truly say I've

> been there, done that, and that was over two decades ago, while some

> of the current "experts" were barely out of pooping in their pampers.

> I'm simply watching the parade of fakers march past. Like I've said,

> see it all before. What can I say, goofy hobby, yes, but damn it has

> it's moments. You may not know it, but in your own weird way you are

> entertaining me. Thanks. :-)

>

On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 08:17:32 +0100, "dennis@home"

<dennis@killspam.kicks-ass.net> wrote:

>

>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

>news:d8r8e398udglintnsb6d6sqfgan5o8fu06@4ax.com...

>> On Sun, 9 Sep 2007 22:00:19 +0100, "dennis@home"

>> <dennis@killspam.kicks-ass.net> wrote:

>>

>>>

>>>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

>>>news:k8l8e39ed1k058m7ggs9ii4k6esn752mum@4ax.com...

>>>> On Sun, 9 Sep 2007 20:49:57 +0100, "dennis@home"

>>>> <dennis@killspam.kicks-ass.net> wrote:

>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

>>>>>news:kr78e3pg1i137hh9bnj24be3m8afi1f4j3@4ax.com...

>>>>>

>>>>>> Does it really matter?

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>Only as much as it appears anything alias and much of what others say..

>>>>>is

>>>>>wrong.

>>>>

>>>> Wow, that's mighty judgmental. I could make a list and it would be a

>>>> damn long one of all the wrong things fanboys and MVPs have said here

>>>> in the last nine months.

>>>

>>>What has that got to do with it?

>>

>> You're pandering to ONE side. While Alias and others may be a bit over

>> the top in praising Linux, there are even more praising Vista, simply

>> because they don't know any better. Ever since I first visited this

>> newsgroup about nine months ago there has always been non stop banter

>> back and forth. A little of that is normal in many newsgroups. Here

>> there are obviously a few hot headed fools that are rabid in their

>> blind devotion to Microsoft so they don't see clearly. I don't even

>> have to mention who the worst case is, everyone knows what PUTZ I

>> mean. He's that big an idiot and the cause of 90% of the noise.

>>

>>>Even if its true, which I don't know, it has nothing to do with this.

>>>You may think there is some kind of contest to see who can come up with

>>>the

>>>biggest lie but I don't.

>>

>> The biggest thing I see wrong with this newsgroup is too many blindly

>> ignore all that's wrong with Vista trying to sweep problems under the

>> rug rather than openly discussing them. How does that help anybody

>> having real problems? The irony is for some so-called "support"

>> newsgroup, this one sucks big time. That's an honest assessment of the

>> silly happenings here. Talk about shooting the messenger. Too many

>> here simply don't want to hear about Vista problems. They prefer to

>> live in never never land and seem to enjoy pretending everything is

>> peachy.

>

>As I see it you get three types here:-

>

>A: Those with Vista with a serious problem looking for a solution.

>

>B: Those without Vista, without a solution looking for a problem and those

>without windows looking for a problem.

>

>C: Those like me who dropped in with a minor problem and are still waiting

>to see if a solution appears.

>

>You and alias and a few others are in catagory B and are of no use at all to

>people in categories A or C who already have Vista and don't want to

>uninstal it and replace it with something else at this time.

 

Your comments as lame as they are sadly typical of the clueless fanboy

crowd. Right off the bat you get it wrong. I've had Vista installed

since February, which if you would have bothered to check before

flapping you gums making a fool of yourself you could have easily

determined reading many of my posts where I've offered suggestions for

people having problems. Why would I want to uninstall it? You make no

sense. I want it to WORK. Are you so dense that you find that an

unreasonable expectation? I'm actually in Group D.

 

D: Experienced users that have used many versions of Windows over the

years and keep hoping Microsoft finally gets it's act together and

releases a WORKING version of Windows not desperately needing a

Service Pak before it actually works right. I'm sick of being

some unpaid beta tester that has to fight with a bloated,

rushed out the door, not fully tested pile of crap that is

obviously causing untold numbers of customers serious problems with

Microsoft basically saying talk to the hand.

 

What I find revolting is the fanboy crowd is all too willing to except

good enough is good enough. This newsgroup is filled with moronic

posts saying don't expect any better, because Microsoft has always

released Windows this way: Prematurely, bug infested and people are

expected to wait till SP1 before it is even close to being really

ready for retail release. I have one question. What the hell is wrong

with your people? Why do you line up to hand over your money to

Microsoft for a product that never delivers without needed a major

rewrite?

Adam Albright wrote:

> On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 08:17:32 +0100, "dennis@home"

> <dennis@killspam.kicks-ass.net> wrote:

>

>

>>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

>>news:d8r8e398udglintnsb6d6sqfgan5o8fu06@4ax.com...

>>

>>>On Sun, 9 Sep 2007 22:00:19 +0100, "dennis@home"

>>><dennis@killspam.kicks-ass.net> wrote:

>>>

>>>

>>>>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

>>>>news:k8l8e39ed1k058m7ggs9ii4k6esn752mum@4ax.com...

>>>>

>>>>>On Sun, 9 Sep 2007 20:49:57 +0100, "dennis@home"

>>>>><dennis@killspam.kicks-ass.net> wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

>>>>>>news:kr78e3pg1i137hh9bnj24be3m8afi1f4j3@4ax.com...

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>>Does it really matter?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>Only as much as it appears anything alias and much of what others say..

>>>>>>is

>>>>>>wrong.

>>>>>

>>>>>Wow, that's mighty judgmental. I could make a list and it would be a

>>>>>damn long one of all the wrong things fanboys and MVPs have said here

>>>>>in the last nine months.

>>>>

>>>>What has that got to do with it?

>>>

>>>You're pandering to ONE side. While Alias and others may be a bit over

>>>the top in praising Linux, there are even more praising Vista, simply

>>>because they don't know any better. Ever since I first visited this

>>>newsgroup about nine months ago there has always been non stop banter

>>>back and forth. A little of that is normal in many newsgroups. Here

>>>there are obviously a few hot headed fools that are rabid in their

>>>blind devotion to Microsoft so they don't see clearly. I don't even

>>>have to mention who the worst case is, everyone knows what PUTZ I

>>>mean. He's that big an idiot and the cause of 90% of the noise.

>>>

>>>

>>>>Even if its true, which I don't know, it has nothing to do with this.

>>>>You may think there is some kind of contest to see who can come up with

>>>>the

>>>>biggest lie but I don't.

>>>

>>>The biggest thing I see wrong with this newsgroup is too many blindly

>>>ignore all that's wrong with Vista trying to sweep problems under the

>>>rug rather than openly discussing them. How does that help anybody

>>>having real problems? The irony is for some so-called "support"

>>>newsgroup, this one sucks big time. That's an honest assessment of the

>>>silly happenings here. Talk about shooting the messenger. Too many

>>>here simply don't want to hear about Vista problems. They prefer to

>>>live in never never land and seem to enjoy pretending everything is

>>>peachy.

>>

>>As I see it you get three types here:-

>>

>>A: Those with Vista with a serious problem looking for a solution.

>>

>>B: Those without Vista, without a solution looking for a problem and those

>>without windows looking for a problem.

>>

>>C: Those like me who dropped in with a minor problem and are still waiting

>>to see if a solution appears.

>>

>>You and alias and a few others are in catagory B and are of no use at all to

>>people in categories A or C who already have Vista and don't want to

>>uninstal it and replace it with something else at this time.

>

>

> Your comments as lame as they are sadly typical of the clueless fanboy

> crowd. Right off the bat you get it wrong. I've had Vista installed

> since February, which if you would have bothered to check before

> flapping you gums making a fool of yourself you could have easily

> determined reading many of my posts where I've offered suggestions for

> people having problems. Why would I want to uninstall it? You make no

> sense. I want it to WORK. Are you so dense that you find that an

> unreasonable expectation? I'm actually in Group D.

>

> D: Experienced users that have used many versions of Windows over the

> years and keep hoping Microsoft finally gets it's act together and

> releases a WORKING version of Windows not desperately needing a

> Service Pak before it actually works right. I'm sick of being

> some unpaid beta tester that has to fight with a bloated,

> rushed out the door, not fully tested pile of crap that is

> obviously causing untold numbers of customers serious problems with

> Microsoft basically saying talk to the hand.

>

> What I find revolting is the fanboy crowd is all too willing to except

> good enough is good enough. This newsgroup is filled with moronic

> posts saying don't expect any better, because Microsoft has always

> released Windows this way: Prematurely, bug infested and people are

> expected to wait till SP1 before it is even close to being really

> ready for retail release. I have one question. What the hell is wrong

> with your people? Why do you line up to hand over your money to

> Microsoft for a product that never delivers without needed a major

> rewrite?

>

>

 

Can't you find another stupid diatribe remark to cover up your ignorance

and computer incompetence?

We're all sick and tired of the same old lame excuse you post every time

someone puts your dumb ass into a corner over your in ability to get

your one little flawed install of Vista business running correctly.

Try posting something intelligent for once your fat PUTZ!

Frank

linuxlover66@gmail.com wrote:

> On Sep 8, 5:18 pm, <msnews.microsoft.com> wrote:

>> I am currently running XP MCE SP2 without any problems at all. AMD 64bit

>> 3200, 2 GB RAM, nVidia 6600 GT Video, 250 GB SATA HD. Hauppauge tuner card.

>> Vista upgrade advisor says everything is supported and all device and apps

>> are fine. My typical work is in SQL Server 2005, VStudio 2005 and Office

>> 2007. I use Media Centre occasionally. I am wondering if it is actually

>> worth upgrading to Ultimate. I have read about a lot of issues... it

>> doesn't seem that many peole are very happy with Vista. Any feedback?

>

> You should upgrade to Linux and fully utilize the excellent hardware

> you have.

> Running total OpenSource software is really the only way to get the

> freedom from proprietary constraints.

> Why pay $200 for Vista when you can get Ubuntu for free?

>

> Your hardware will scream with Linux.

>

>

>

If you don't have any problem stick with what you have until you do have

problems. You should only upgrade if you think there is a real benefit

from it. XP is fine until you need something else in the future which

might not be supported by it.

I agree, I almost to the point of telling general user's asking my advice to wait until the first service pack is released for DX10.

Other than that I have not seen any significant need.

Vista looks great, but still on the obtuse side for the average user by far.

 

It is a worthwhile effort but we are coming up on the first years end since its release and for the most part,

Software vendors are not programming for 64-bit, and hardware vendors are not finding the demand yet.

 

"ProfGene" <mfevs@winco.net> wrote in message news:ficab0$ogt$1@news04.infoave.net...

linuxlover66@gmail.com wrote:

> On Sep 8, 5:18 pm, <msnews.microsoft.com> wrote:

>> I am currently running XP MCE SP2 without any problems at all. AMD 64bit

>> 3200, 2 GB RAM, nVidia 6600 GT Video, 250 GB SATA HD. Hauppauge tuner card.

>> Vista upgrade advisor says everything is supported and all device and apps

>> are fine. My typical work is in SQL Server 2005, VStudio 2005 and Office

>> 2007. I use Media Centre occasionally. I am wondering if it is actually

>> worth upgrading to Ultimate. I have read about a lot of issues... it

>> doesn't seem that many peole are very happy with Vista. Any feedback?

>

> You should upgrade to Linux and fully utilize the excellent hardware

> you have.

> Running total OpenSource software is really the only way to get the

> freedom from proprietary constraints.

> Why pay $200 for Vista when you can get Ubuntu for free?

>

> Your hardware will scream with Linux.

>

>

>

If you don't have any problem stick with what you have until you do have

problems. You should only upgrade if you think there is a real benefit

from it. XP is fine until you need something else in the future which

might not be supported by it.

Please read my review:

http://www.activewin.com/reviews/software/operating-sys/vista/index.shtml

 

The security features in Vista alone make it a worthy upgrade in my honest

opinion.

--

Andre

Blog: http://adacosta.spaces.live.com

My Vista Quickstart Guide:

http://adacosta.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!E8E5CC039D51E3DB!9709.entry

"ProfGene" <mfevs@winco.net> wrote in message

news:ficab0$ogt$1@news04.infoave.net...

> linuxlover66@gmail.com wrote:

>> On Sep 8, 5:18 pm, <msnews.microsoft.com> wrote:

>>> I am currently running XP MCE SP2 without any problems at all. AMD

>>> 64bit

>>> 3200, 2 GB RAM, nVidia 6600 GT Video, 250 GB SATA HD. Hauppauge tuner

>>> card.

>>> Vista upgrade advisor says everything is supported and all device and

>>> apps

>>> are fine. My typical work is in SQL Server 2005, VStudio 2005 and

>>> Office

>>> 2007. I use Media Centre occasionally. I am wondering if it is

>>> actually

>>> worth upgrading to Ultimate. I have read about a lot of issues... it

>>> doesn't seem that many peole are very happy with Vista. Any feedback?

>>

>> You should upgrade to Linux and fully utilize the excellent hardware

>> you have.

>> Running total OpenSource software is really the only way to get the

>> freedom from proprietary constraints.

>> Why pay $200 for Vista when you can get Ubuntu for free?

>>

>> Your hardware will scream with Linux.

>>

>>

>>

> If you don't have any problem stick with what you have until you do have

> problems. You should only upgrade if you think there is a real benefit

> from it. XP is fine until you need something else in the future which

> might not be supported by it.

In article <eevuos5LIHA.3516@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl>,

Andre Da Costa[ActiveWin] <andred25@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Please read my review:

>http://www.activewin.com/reviews/software/operating-sys/vista/index.shtml

>

 

Wow. That is a totally awesome review.

 

Question: Other than forcing the user to click a popup for everything

what exactly does it buy you? IMHO people will simply begin clicking the

thing by reflex or find a way to turn it off.

"the wharf rat" <wrat@panix.com> wrote in message

news:ficneo$bmp$1@reader1.panix.com...

> In article <eevuos5LIHA.3516@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl>,

> Andre Da Costa[ActiveWin] <andred25@hotmail.com> wrote:

>>Please read my review:

>>http://www.activewin.com/reviews/software/operating-sys/vista/index.shtml

>>

>

> Wow. That is a totally awesome review.

>

> Question: Other than forcing the user to click a popup for everything

> what exactly does it buy you? IMHO people will simply begin clicking the

> thing by reflex or find a way to turn it off.

>

 

 

I didn't get any popups.

Perhaps I have my browser configured better.

In article <ficnjq$2um$1@aioe.org>, forty-nine <49@linux.sux> wrote:

>"the wharf rat" <wrat@panix.com> wrote in message

>>

>> Question: Other than forcing the user to click a popup for everything

>> what exactly does it buy you? IMHO people will simply begin clicking the

>

>I didn't get any popups.

 

Sorry, I guess I wasn't clear. I'm refering to the UAC thing.