Jump to content

Guest, which answer was the most helpful?

If any of these replies answered your question, please take a moment to click the 'Mark as solution' button on the post with the best answer.
Marking posts as the solution will help other community members find answers to their questions quickly. Thank you for your help!

Featured Replies

Posted

My Windows Server 2003 SP2 server (IIS 6, MySQL, Tomcat, PostgreSQL,

PHP via FastCGI) runs at a constant 90k-105k handles. The Limit is set

at 2492408.

 

I think there is something wrong since that's an insanely high count -

but the server remains fast and stable, so I'm not sure.

 

It's an x86, with 1GB of RAM (generally around 3/4ths is used).

 

 

Is there something wrong or is this perfectly OK?

On Jul 4, 8:17 am, Computer Guru <mqu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> My Windows Server 2003 SP2 server (IIS 6, MySQL, Tomcat, PostgreSQL,

> PHP via FastCGI) runs at a constant 90k-105k handles. The Limit is set

> at 2492408.

>

> I think there is something wrong since that's an insanely high count -

> but the server remains fast and stable, so I'm not sure.

>

> It's an x86, with 1GB of RAM (generally around 3/4ths is used).

>

> Is there something wrong or is this perfectly OK?

 

Please ignore that sentence about the limit. I was looking in the

wrong place - that's for the "commit charge"

Why making a problem, when it is fast and stable?

 

Computer Guru wrote:

> My Windows Server 2003 SP2 server (IIS 6, MySQL, Tomcat, PostgreSQL,

> PHP via FastCGI) runs at a constant 90k-105k handles. The Limit is set

> at 2492408.

>

> I think there is something wrong since that's an insanely high count -

> but the server remains fast and stable, so I'm not sure.

>

> It's an x86, with 1GB of RAM (generally around 3/4ths is used).

>

>

> Is there something wrong or is this perfectly OK?

>

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...