On Sat, 1 Sep 2007 15:48:30 +0800, "David A. Spicer"

<vista_ultimate_fan@hotmail.com> wrote:

>No, I didn't mean delete posts. Merely warning, and banning if necessary,

>the posters of these worthless posts would suffice.

 

Are you planning on moving to China or Cuba soon? They love the idea

of strictly controlling who can do and say what. Break the rules, who

knows, the punishment varies from an all expense paid vacation in some

cold dank prison cell for a dozen years or so while you undergo

intensive retraining to respect the absolute powers of the state to

just trotting you out into the parking lot to meet a firing squad

after having a staged show trial that before it began already

concluded you were guilty.

 

Newsgroups are one of the last remaining beacons of free speech. This

newsgroup doesn't need some wannabe be hall monitor, whistle blower,

net cop or blowhard deciding what is or isn't appropriate. You see

that's exactly why out of the 100,000 plus newsgroups there are, only

a tiny handful are moderated.

 

Fools like Jupiter are just trying to impose themselves as you

"leader" and as often as such idiots claim otherwise their actions

confirm what Bozo's like him are all about which is CONTROL and he is

itching to have control so he can pontificate even more than he

already does. Ain't going to happen.

On Sat, 1 Sep 2007 21:54:11 +0800, "David A. Spicer"

<vista_ultimate_fan@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Well in that case, I applaud the patience of you and your fellow MVP's.

>--------------------

>Artificial Intelligence usually beats real stupidity.

>

Damn, you're really a first class boot licker!

Adam Albright wrote:

> On Sat, 1 Sep 2007 21:54:11 +0800, "David A. Spicer"

> <vista_ultimate_fan@hotmail.com> wrote:

>

>> Well in that case, I applaud the patience of you and your fellow MVP's.

>> --------------------

>> Artificial Intelligence usually beats real stupidity.

>>

> Damn, you're really a first class boot licker!

>

 

<And you are a first class lent licker in public restrooms with your

dirty old man chananigans!>

Adam Albright wrote:

>

> Fools like Jupiter are just trying to impose themselves as you

> "leader" and as often as such idiots claim otherwise their actions

> confirm what Bozo's like him are all about which is CONTROL and he is

> itching to have control so he can pontificate even more than he

> already does. Ain't going to happen.

>

>

 

<Does anyone see any difference in what the old *clown* is doing, as he

tries to control the NG? His sick and delusional mind can't see what it

is up to. The right mind Dr. Jekyll and can't see what the left mind Mr.

Heckle is doing.>

Charlie Wilkes <charlie_wilkes@users.easynews.com> wrote:

> Why can't you direct your questions about Vista to Microsoft?

 

What a odd comment, I have no questions about Vista, it works and works

perfectly for me. Possibly because I RTFM first?

> If you're using it anyplace outside of Asia, chances are you paid

> through the nose for it, and you shouldn't have to rely on Usenet

> for tech support.

 

I paid nothing for it, of course, and I rely on usenet for tech support

for ALL hardware and software issues, it's far and away the best

source.

 

 

--

XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups

The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html

On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 09:29:14 -0700, XS11E <xs11e@NOSPAMyahoo.com>

wrote:

>Charlie Wilkes <charlie_wilkes@users.easynews.com> wrote:

>

>> Why can't you direct your questions about Vista to Microsoft?

>

>What a odd comment, I have no questions about Vista, it works and works

>perfectly for me. Possibly because I RTFM first?

 

What manual? There isn't any. You have no questions about Vista? Odd,

I have a few hundred NOBODY has been able to answer.

>

>> If you're using it anyplace outside of Asia, chances are you paid

>> through the nose for it, and you shouldn't have to rely on Usenet

>> for tech support.

>

>I paid nothing for it, of course, and I rely on usenet for tech support

>for ALL hardware and software issues, it's far and away the best

>source.

 

LOL! Yea, sure when the "experts" you rely on are Frank, Jupiter and

assorted other fakers. Thanks for sharing, I now understand your

experience level.

On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 09:29:14 -0700, XS11E wrote:

> Charlie Wilkes <charlie_wilkes@users.easynews.com> wrote:

>

>> Why can't you direct your questions about Vista to Microsoft?

>

> What a odd comment, I have no questions about Vista, it works and works

> perfectly for me. Possibly because I RTFM first?

 

Well then why are you bitching about how you have to direct your

questions to GRC groups?

>

>> If you're using it anyplace outside of Asia, chances are you paid

>> through the nose for it, and you shouldn't have to rely on Usenet for

>> tech support.

>

> I paid nothing for it, of course,

 

Bigshot, eh?

 

Charlie

Charlie Wilkes <charlie_wilkes@users.easynews.com> wrote:

> On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 09:29:14 -0700, XS11E wrote:

>

>> Charlie Wilkes <charlie_wilkes@users.easynews.com> wrote:

>>

>>> Why can't you direct your questions about Vista to Microsoft?

>>

>> What a odd comment, I have no questions about Vista, it works and

>> works perfectly for me. Possibly because I RTFM first?

>

> Well then why are you bitching about how you have to direct your

> questions to GRC groups?

 

I wasn't, sorry about your reading disability.

 

 

--

XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups

The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html

Adam Albright wrote:

>

> What manual? There isn't any. You have no questions about Vista? Odd,

> I have a few hundred NOBODY has been able to answer.

 

You mean like why in the world did I (aa) do an in place upgrade install

of Vista business and am now blaming MS for my not being able to get it

to run correctly?

Is that your question you fukkin loser?

>

>>>If you're using it anyplace outside of Asia, chances are you paid

>>>through the nose for it, and you shouldn't have to rely on Usenet

>>>for tech support.

>>

>>I paid nothing for it, of course, and I rely on usenet for tech support

>>for ALL hardware and software issues, it's far and away the best

>>source.

>

>

> LOL! Yea, sure when the "experts" you rely on are Frank, Jupiter and

> assorted other fakers.

 

You mean "fakers" who can properly install and run Vista (multiple

installs) whereas you, mr computer expert, can't even get his one little

upgraded install of Vista business to run correctly.

Is that what you're talking about mr genius?

 

Thanks for sharing, I now understand your

> experience level.

 

Yeah, we get your level of knowledge and expertise ok. Bottom of the

fukkin barrel!

 

ROTFLMAO

Frank

Adam Albright wrote:

> On Sat, 1 Sep 2007 21:54:11 +0800, "David A. Spicer"

> <vista_ultimate_fan@hotmail.com> wrote:

>

>

>>Well in that case, I applaud the patience of you and your fellow MVP's.

>>--------------------

>>Artificial Intelligence usually beats real stupidity.

>>

>

> Damn, you're really a first class boot licker!

>

 

And you're a first class as*hole faker!

Frank

Adam Albright wrote:

 

>

> Fools like Jupiter are just trying to impose themselves as you

> "leader" and as often as such idiots claim otherwise their actions

> confirm what Bozo's like him are all about which is CONTROL and he is

> itching to have control so he can pontificate even more than he

> already does. Ain't going to happen.

>

>

"Fools"...you're the biggest fool blowhard idiot faker lying loser in

this ng.

Wake up you moron!

Or didn't you yet realize everyone here is laughing at your stupid ass?

Frank

> What a odd comment, I have no questions about Vista, it works and works

> perfectly for me. Possibly because I RTFM first?

>

>

>

>

Manual? Are you kidding? Just bought 2 new laptops with Vista a couple

months ago. Didn't get any frickin' manuals. I doubt you did either.

But I do go to to Help when I have a question. And if that doesn't

answer my question, then I go on line and Google and then ask in a

newsgroup. I don't always get my questions answered, but I do often

enough that I find those two resources worth my time. Manual. Ha! MS

is too cheap to include a manual.

 

Dave

On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 11:36:03 -0700, XS11E wrote:

> Charlie Wilkes <charlie_wilkes@users.easynews.com> wrote:

>

>> On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 09:29:14 -0700, XS11E wrote:

>>

>>> Charlie Wilkes <charlie_wilkes@users.easynews.com> wrote:

>>>

>>>> Why can't you direct your questions about Vista to Microsoft?

>>>

>>> What a odd comment, I have no questions about Vista, it works and

>>> works perfectly for me. Possibly because I RTFM first?

>>

>> Well then why are you bitching about how you have to direct your

>> questions to GRC groups?

>

> I wasn't, sorry about your reading disability.

>

OK, my bad. You referred to questions you _get_ about Vista rather than

questions you _have_ about Vista. So, with this misunderstanding put

aside, let me ask you: if Vista works perfectly, and if your

comprehension of Vista leaves you with no unanswered questions, then why

are you complaining about the need to refer questions about Vista that

you _get_? Why don't you consult the mighty oracle resting on your

shoulders and deliver the answer, instead of obliging your supplicants to

scramble around on various help forums?

 

Charlie

David <david@invalid.com> wrote:

>

>> What a odd comment, I have no questions about Vista, it works and

>> works perfectly for me. Possibly because I RTFM first?

> Manual? Are you kidding?

 

No, I'm not kidding. RTFM means a whole lot more than a paper manual.

 

Simply put, it means do your homework.

 

 

--

XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups

The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html

Paper manuals largely disappeared years ago for many reasons with a

few being:

1. Many never read their manuals, some leaving them in the original

boxes and eventually throwing them away never having been used.

2. Eliminating paper manuals saves $ for manufacturers by eliminating

printing costs, distribution costs etc.

3. Environmentalists liked the idea since less paper means less trees

cut down.

There are probably other reasons, but those are three I quickly

thought of.

 

The above applies to many manufacturers not just Microsoft.

 

--

Jupiter Jones [MVP]

http://www3.telus.net/dandemar

http://www.dts-l.org

 

 

"David" <david@invalid.com> wrote in message

news:MfWdnf0ry5_jTUTbnZ2dnUVZ_o6knZ2d@comcast.com...

> Manual? Are you kidding? Just bought 2 new laptops with Vista a

> couple months ago. Didn't get any frickin' manuals. I doubt you

> did either. But I do go to to Help when I have a question. And if

> that doesn't answer my question, then I go on line and Google and

> then ask in a newsgroup. I don't always get my questions answered,

> but I do often enough that I find those two resources worth my time.

> Manual. Ha! MS is too cheap to include a manual.

>

> Dave

XS11E wrote:

> David <david@invalid.com> wrote:

>

>

>>> What a odd comment, I have no questions about Vista, it works and

>>> works perfectly for me. Possibly because I RTFM first?

>>>

>

>

>> Manual? Are you kidding?

>>

>

> No, I'm not kidding. RTFM means a whole lot more than a paper manual.

>

> Simply put, it means do your homework.

>

>

>

so u are redefining "RTFM". fair enough.

XS11E wrote:

> David <david@invalid.com> wrote:

>

>

>>> What a odd comment, I have no questions about Vista, it works and

>>> works perfectly for me. Possibly because I RTFM first?

>>>

>

>

>> Manual? Are you kidding?

>>

>

> No, I'm not kidding. RTFM means a whole lot more than a paper manual.

>

> Simply put, it means do your homework.

>

>

>

btw, don't u think "DAGS" would have been more appropriate than "RTFM",

since there IS no manual??

Jupiter Jones [MVP] wrote:

> Paper manuals largely disappeared years ago for many reasons with a

> few being:

> 1. Many never read their manuals, some leaving them in the original

> boxes and eventually throwing them away never having been used.

> 2. Eliminating paper manuals saves $ for manufacturers by eliminating

> printing costs, distribution costs etc.

> 3. Environmentalists liked the idea since less paper means less trees

> cut down.

> There are probably other reasons, but those are three I quickly

> thought of.

>

> The above applies to many manufacturers not just Microsoft.

>

or you could just condense all those reasons down to the REAL reason--COST.

On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 16:25:30 -0700, David <david@invalid.com> wrote:

>Jupiter Jones [MVP] wrote:

>> Paper manuals largely disappeared years ago for many reasons with a

>> few being:

>> 1. Many never read their manuals, some leaving them in the original

>> boxes and eventually throwing them away never having been used.

>> 2. Eliminating paper manuals saves $ for manufacturers by eliminating

>> printing costs, distribution costs etc.

>> 3. Environmentalists liked the idea since less paper means less trees

>> cut down.

>> There are probably other reasons, but those are three I quickly

>> thought of.

>>

>> The above applies to many manufacturers not just Microsoft.

>>

>or you could just condense all those reasons down to the REAL reason--COST.

 

 

JJ is forever and foremost a Microsoft apologist.

David <david@invalid.com> wrote:

> XS11E wrote:

>> David <david@invalid.com> wrote:

>>>> What a odd comment, I have no questions about Vista, it works

>>>> and works perfectly for me. Possibly because I RTFM first?

>>> Manual? Are you kidding?

>> No, I'm not kidding. RTFM means a whole lot more than a paper

>> manual.

>> Simply put, it means do your homework.

> so u are redefining "RTFM". fair enough.

 

Not really, that's what it's always meant, or at least since Windows

3.0 days....

 

 

 

 

--

XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups

The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html

Perhaps, but I think the manuals being eliminated is the result of

many things.

Narrowing it down to just one and ignoring others can give a false

impression since there multiple benefits.

Although I do believe cost was a major factor.

 

--

Jupiter Jones [MVP]

http://www3.telus.net/dandemar

http://www.dts-l.org

 

 

"David" <david@invalid.com> wrote in message

news:Fu-dndIcqKRyaUTbnZ2dnUVZ_qvinZ2d@comcast.com...

> or you could just condense all those reasons down to the REAL

> reason--COST.

Jupiter Jones [MVP] wrote:

> Perhaps, but I think the manuals being eliminated is the result of

> many things.

> Narrowing it down to just one and ignoring others can give a false

> impression since there multiple benefits.

> Although I do believe cost was a major factor.

>

as with most things, it's all about the bottom line: leaving out the

manual saves on printing, packaging, and shipping costs. all win/win

items for the mfgr.

 

Dave

You're close. I just moved to the Philippines the first of the year. No such

restrictions.

--------------------

Useless Invention: Unsinkable submarine.

 

 

 

"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

news:53rid35bndsrqeee5lff4tk7cu1cfbjr3u@4ax.com...

> On Sat, 1 Sep 2007 15:48:30 +0800, "David A. Spicer"

> <vista_ultimate_fan@hotmail.com> wrote:

>

>>No, I didn't mean delete posts. Merely warning, and banning if necessary,

>>the posters of these worthless posts would suffice.

>

> Are you planning on moving to China or Cuba soon? They love the idea

> of strictly controlling who can do and say what. Break the rules, who

> knows, the punishment varies from an all expense paid vacation in some

> cold dank prison cell for a dozen years or so while you undergo

> intensive retraining to respect the absolute powers of the state to

> just trotting you out into the parking lot to meet a firing squad

> after having a staged show trial that before it began already

> concluded you were guilty.

>

> Newsgroups are one of the last remaining beacons of free speech. This

> newsgroup doesn't need some wannabe be hall monitor, whistle blower,

> net cop or blowhard deciding what is or isn't appropriate. You see

> that's exactly why out of the 100,000 plus newsgroups there are, only

> a tiny handful are moderated.

>

> Fools like Jupiter are just trying to impose themselves as you

> "leader" and as often as such idiots claim otherwise their actions

> confirm what Bozo's like him are all about which is CONTROL and he is

> itching to have control so he can pontificate even more than he

> already does. Ain't going to happen.

>

>

Adam Albright wrote:

>

>

> JJ is forever and foremost a Microsoft apologist.

>

 

Is there ever a point in time that you're not a fukkin loser as*hole?

Frank