Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

Hello, there is higher %wa value on top command both on VPS and on host server (OpenVZ virtualization). Both RHEL CentOS 5.x

 

VPS:

 

Quote:

[root@* hqs]# w

18:13:05 up 17 days, 12:34, 1 user, load average: 1.08, 1.40, 1.33

USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE JCPU PCPU WHAT

root pts/0 :1.0 03May14 17days 0.01s 0.01s -bash

[root@vps hqs]# iostat

Linux 2.6.18-371.3.1.el5.028stab110.1 (*) 05/20/14

 

avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle

8.68 0.16 7.90 12.80 0.00 70.46

 

Device: tps Blk_read/s Blk_wrtn/s Blk_read Blk_wrtn

 

[root@vps hqs]# vmstat

procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system-- -----cpu------

r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa st

2 0 0 9047468 0 0 0 0 13 24 0 7 9 8 70 13 0

 

Host server:

 

Quote:

-bash-3.2# w;iostat;vmstat

12:15:17 up 21 days, 7:05, 1 user, load average: 26.44, 28.58, 20.12

USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE JCPU PCPU WHAT

root pts/0 chomsky.torserve 12:00 0.00s 0.03s 0.02s w

Linux 2.6.18-371.3.1.el5.028stab110.1 (*) 05/20/14

 

avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle

10.87 0.16 3.60 13.08 0.00 72.29

 

Device: tps Blk_read/s Blk_wrtn/s Blk_read Blk_wrtn

sda 263.58 521.79 9977.21 960046912 18357245870

sda1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2302 38

sda2 263.58 521.79 9977.21 960044330 18357245832

dm-0 1265.03 521.79 9977.21 960041306 18357244688

dm-1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2536 2136

 

procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system-- -----cpu------

r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa st

8 7 288 561216 999776 15036684 0 0 16 312 1 1 11 4 72 13 0

io, packets per second on host server for all OpenVZ VMs:

a9897ad97c492fa0d10a14e59a1cf426.jpg.99a3f497a74c510a1a56296bea4ccb37.jpg

 

host server load is usually around 9, server having 16 cores.

 

Please anyone can advice some commands or ideas? Thank you

 

Continue reading...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...