"Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

news:fbcunr$9rb$1@aioe.org...

> Saucy wrote:

>> You use Windows, eh? That's rich, the Ubuntu advocate runs Windows.

>> Saucy

>

> LOL! I've been using windows since 92. If the gaming folks made their

> games for Ubuntu, I would ditch Windows in a New York second.

>

> --

> Alias

> To email me, remove shoes

 

Uh huh. Not much of an advocate in other words - you don't put your money

where your mouth is.

 

But I have to agree, like for many things including gaming, the Linux

platform doesn't cut it.

 

People who do sound production have a similar excuse. Most of the really

good software is on the Windows platform save the odd Mac piece.

 

The Linux platform doesn't cut it. Not for games, not for sound, not for

business and so on. About he only major success Linux has is in file and web

file serving .. and it doesn't do any better than Windows at these, if. The

rest of the Linux platform is and will stay sh*t.

 

Saucy

"Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

news:fbejmp$i3h$1@aioe.org...

> I have never advised anyone to switch to Ubuntu for gaming. I have advised

> it if they are tired of the "anti piracy" crap, being prone to viruses and

> malware, the ease of install, etc. and that it will do MOST things that

> MOST people need.

 

You have advised people to switch to Ubuntu without a clue as to what they

want to do!

So you can stop those lies as they are easy to disprove.

> Just curious, why do you object to my running more than one OS? I may buy

> a Mac. Will that bother you too?

 

No, but I bet the Mac user group are worried.

"The poster formerly known as the poster formerly known as Nina DiBoy"

<nonee@none.not> wrote in message news:fbekk2$k9e$1@aioe.org...

> dennis@home wrote:

>>

>> "The poster formerly known as the poster formerly known as Nina DiBoy"

>> <nonee@none.not> wrote in message news:fbd8v0$3ht$1@aioe.org...

>>

>>> Windows does not do all Ubuntu does, not in some cases. For example, I

>>> was able to purchase a $300 Dell server with No OS, load linux, and run

>>> apache off of it, sendmail, samba, and all of my other server type

>>> applications while spending only the money for the hardware as opposed

>>> to spending all of the other money that it would cost to do it on

>>> windows software.

>>

>> What is all this "other money it would cost to do it on windows"?

>> The same free applications run on windows to do your mail (not sendmail,

>> I hope <spits>), etc. as those that are on linux so there is no extra

>> cost if you have a windows system.

>>

>>

>

> It just costs alot more to purchase a windows server OS, and with windows,

> you are also more prone to security issues.

>

 

Why would you need a windows server OS?

Windows Server is a software package specially designed for server

operation. It comes with a wide variety of softwares for server duties.

 

[Windows Server 2003 Operating Systems]

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-ca/windowsserver/bb429524.aspx

 

Saucy

 

 

"dennis@home" <dennis@killspam.kicks-ass.net> wrote in message

news:C853909A-2D3D-489D-9ECE-4B26734F06AA@microsoft.com...

>

> "The poster formerly known as the poster formerly known as Nina DiBoy"

> <nonee@none.not> wrote in message news:fbekk2$k9e$1@aioe.org...

>> dennis@home wrote:

>>>

>>> "The poster formerly known as the poster formerly known as Nina DiBoy"

>>> <nonee@none.not> wrote in message news:fbd8v0$3ht$1@aioe.org...

>>>

>>>> Windows does not do all Ubuntu does, not in some cases. For example, I

>>>> was able to purchase a $300 Dell server with No OS, load linux, and run

>>>> apache off of it, sendmail, samba, and all of my other server type

>>>> applications while spending only the money for the hardware as opposed

>>>> to spending all of the other money that it would cost to do it on

>>>> windows software.

>>>

>>> What is all this "other money it would cost to do it on windows"?

>>> The same free applications run on windows to do your mail (not sendmail,

>>> I hope <spits>), etc. as those that are on linux so there is no extra

>>> cost if you have a windows system.

>>>

>>>

>>

>> It just costs alot more to purchase a windows server OS, and with

>> windows, you are also more prone to security issues.

>>

>

> Why would you need a windows server OS?

dennis@home wrote:

>

> "The poster formerly known as the poster formerly known as Nina DiBoy"

> <nonee@none.not> wrote in message news:fbekk2$k9e$1@aioe.org...

>> dennis@home wrote:

>>>

>>> "The poster formerly known as the poster formerly known as Nina

>>> DiBoy" <nonee@none.not> wrote in message news:fbd8v0$3ht$1@aioe.org...

>>>

>>>> Windows does not do all Ubuntu does, not in some cases. For

>>>> example, I was able to purchase a $300 Dell server with No OS, load

>>>> linux, and run apache off of it, sendmail, samba, and all of my

>>>> other server type applications while spending only the money for the

>>>> hardware as opposed to spending all of the other money that it would

>>>> cost to do it on windows software.

>>>

>>> What is all this "other money it would cost to do it on windows"?

>>> The same free applications run on windows to do your mail (not

>>> sendmail, I hope <spits>), etc. as those that are on linux so there

>>> is no extra cost if you have a windows system.

>>>

>>>

>>

>> It just costs alot more to purchase a windows server OS, and with

>> windows, you are also more prone to security issues.

>>

>

> Why would you need a windows server OS?

 

Wouldn't using a server OS make more sense if your hardware is a server

and you will be utilizing the machine for server apps?

 

--

Priceless quotes in m.p.w.vista.general group:

http://protectfreedom.tripod.com/kick.html

 

"Fair use is not merely a nice concept--it is a federal law based on

free speech rights under the First Amendment and is a cornerstone of the

creativity and innovation that is a hallmark of this country. Consumer

rights in the digital age are not frivolous."

- Maura Corbett

"The poster formerly known as the poster formerly known as Nina DiBoy"

<nonee@none.not> wrote in message news:fbf0v6$k5k$1@aioe.org...

> dennis@home wrote:

>>

>> "The poster formerly known as the poster formerly known as Nina DiBoy"

>> <nonee@none.not> wrote in message news:fbekk2$k9e$1@aioe.org...

>>> dennis@home wrote:

>>>>

>>>> "The poster formerly known as the poster formerly known as Nina DiBoy"

>>>> <nonee@none.not> wrote in message news:fbd8v0$3ht$1@aioe.org...

>>>>

>>>>> Windows does not do all Ubuntu does, not in some cases. For example,

>>>>> I was able to purchase a $300 Dell server with No OS, load linux, and

>>>>> run apache off of it, sendmail, samba, and all of my other server type

>>>>> applications while spending only the money for the hardware as opposed

>>>>> to spending all of the other money that it would cost to do it on

>>>>> windows software.

>>>>

>>>> What is all this "other money it would cost to do it on windows"?

>>>> The same free applications run on windows to do your mail (not

>>>> sendmail, I hope <spits>), etc. as those that are on linux so there is

>>>> no extra cost if you have a windows system.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>

>>> It just costs alot more to purchase a windows server OS, and with

>>> windows, you are also more prone to security issues.

>>>

>>

>> Why would you need a windows server OS?

>

> Wouldn't using a server OS make more sense if your hardware is a server

> and you will be utilizing the machine for server apps?

 

Well the comparison was between windows and ubuntu.. neither is intended as

a server even though both will serve.

dennis@home wrote:

>

> "The poster formerly known as the poster formerly known as Nina DiBoy"

> <nonee@none.not> wrote in message news:fbf0v6$k5k$1@aioe.org...

>> dennis@home wrote:

>>>

>>> "The poster formerly known as the poster formerly known as Nina

>>> DiBoy" <nonee@none.not> wrote in message news:fbekk2$k9e$1@aioe.org...

>>>> dennis@home wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>> "The poster formerly known as the poster formerly known as Nina

>>>>> DiBoy" <nonee@none.not> wrote in message news:fbd8v0$3ht$1@aioe.org...

>>>>>

>>>>>> Windows does not do all Ubuntu does, not in some cases. For

>>>>>> example, I was able to purchase a $300 Dell server with No OS,

>>>>>> load linux, and run apache off of it, sendmail, samba, and all of

>>>>>> my other server type applications while spending only the money

>>>>>> for the hardware as opposed to spending all of the other money

>>>>>> that it would cost to do it on windows software.

>>>>>

>>>>> What is all this "other money it would cost to do it on windows"?

>>>>> The same free applications run on windows to do your mail (not

>>>>> sendmail, I hope <spits>), etc. as those that are on linux so there

>>>>> is no extra cost if you have a windows system.

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> It just costs alot more to purchase a windows server OS, and with

>>>> windows, you are also more prone to security issues.

>>>>

>>>

>>> Why would you need a windows server OS?

>>

>> Wouldn't using a server OS make more sense if your hardware is a

>> server and you will be utilizing the machine for server apps?

>

> Well the comparison was between windows and ubuntu.. neither is intended

> as a server even though both will serve.

 

Well, I was referring to linux, not specifically to ubuntu. I actually

use fedora core. One of the big differences between windows and linux

is that windows has a very clearly drawn line between server and desktop

OSes, while most distributions of linux are all in one package and can

suit either need.

 

--

Priceless quotes in m.p.w.vista.general group:

http://protectfreedom.tripod.com/kick.html

 

"Fair use is not merely a nice concept--it is a federal law based on

free speech rights under the First Amendment and is a cornerstone of the

creativity and innovation that is a hallmark of this country. Consumer

rights in the digital age are not frivolous."

- Maura Corbett

The poster formerly known as the poster formerly known as Nina DiBoy wrote:

> Leythos wrote:

>> In article <fbd8v0$3ht$1@aioe.org>, nonee@none.not says...

>>> Leythos wrote:

>>>> In article <fb8noc$rbd$1@aioe.org>, iamalias@shoesgmail.com says...

>>>>> Leythos wrote:

>>>>>> In article <eXKO5u16HHA.1204@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl>, a@b.com says...

>>>>>>> And yes, I have used Ubuntu, quite a lot actually. I find it

>>>>>>> most amusing that the default installation is that it erases

>>>>>>> Windows and installs itself over.

>>>>>> What's more amusing is that Alias keeps preaching Ubuntu as the

>>>>>> solution for the masses, but he keeps running XP for the same

>>>>>> reason that other people use Windows.

>>>>> I only use Windows for gaming and that's only because the people

>>>>> who make games don't make them for Ubuntu.

>>>>>

>>>>>> If he really believe in his preachings to the masses he would have

>>>>>> got rid of all MS products and lived his message instead of being

>>>>>> such a hypocrite.

>>>>> With the exception of gaming, I *am* living my message and I'm not

>>>>> being hypocritical at all.

>>>> No, you're telling lies, you keep preaching how Ubuntu is what

>>>> people need and that it's better than Windows, but you keep using

>>>> Windows....

>>>>

>>>> You're exposed and a liar - If you're going to keep Windows,

>>>> supporting Microsoft, for any reason, then you don't need Ubuntu -

>>>> Windows does all that Ubuntu does, so there is no reason to have

>>>> Ubuntu - there is no reason to complicate things with having TWO

>>>> O/S's two sets of applications...

>>> Windows does not do all Ubuntu does, not in some cases. For example,

>>> I was able to purchase a $300 Dell server with No OS, load linux, and

>>> run apache off of it, sendmail, samba, and all of my other server

>>> type applications while spending only the money for the hardware as

>>> opposed to spending all of the other money that it would cost to do

>>> it on windows software.

>>

>> Ubuntu doesn't do all of that either, it's ADDED to the distro, same

>> for Windows, I can add all of that to my Windows machine for free also.

>>

>> Why have Ubuntu if you're going to have Windows for other things -

>> that's the point.

>>

>> Alias claimed that Ubuntu was the solution, but he still has Windows

>> to do things that Ubuntu won't do. Sounds like he's not living the

>> truth he preaches.

>>

>

> I'm just saying that you can do it for alot less with linux because you

> don't need to shell out lots of $ for the OS.

>

 

<A person's time is just as valuable to most than money. They don't and

most won't spend the time messing around with Linux, when they are very

familiar with MS solutions O/S(s) or otherwise in the home and work

environments.>

 

<In all the time I have seen people use O/S(s) in the home and work

environments and these are typical everyday Joe Blow users, which make

up the vast vast majority of computer users, I have only seen one other

O/S being used and that Apple, and that was being used by two people.

The rest were using MS, and Linux was no where to be found.>

 

<If you ask Joe Blow home user what O/S(s) he or she will use, the vast

majority are going to say MS. MS is in their face not Linux, not even

Apple that much. The consumer is going to use what's put in their face,

and there is no ignoring that fact in Human nature. It's monkey use what

monkey sees.>

On Sun, 02 Sep 2007 18:26:17 -0400, Adam 50 something child Albright

<WellHeHasToBeSomeone'sChild@Unfoutunatly.net> wrote:

 

><A person's time is just as valuable to most than money. They don't and

>most won't spend the time messing around with Linux, when they are very

>familiar with MS solutions O/S(s) or otherwise in the home and work

>environments.>

 

Total idiot that you are, I guess you think people have time to mess

around with DRM, WMA and UAC, blue screens, Defender, program hangs,

random crashes, searching for drivers, Windows Explorer needs to

close, blah, blah, blah. Damn, if you were any more stupid I wouldn't

be able to stop laughing at your tripe.

>

><In all the time I have seen people use O/S(s) in the home and work

>environments and these are typical everyday Joe Blow users, which make

>up the vast vast majority of computer users, I have only seen one other

>O/S being used and that Apple, and that was being used by two people.

>The rest were using MS, and Linux was no where to be found.>

>It's monkey use what monkey sees.

 

Face facts. You're nothing but a below average troll with sh*t for

brains. Speaking of monkeys, what did you do to so upset your mother?

 

http://williamcalvin.com/portraits/Chimp/Arnhem%20283sml.jpg

Saucy wrote:

> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

> news:fbcunr$9rb$1@aioe.org...

>> Saucy wrote:

>>> You use Windows, eh? That's rich, the Ubuntu advocate runs Windows.

>>> Saucy

>>

>> LOL! I've been using windows since 92. If the gaming folks made their

>> games for Ubuntu, I would ditch Windows in a New York second.

>>

>> --

>> Alias

>> To email me, remove shoes

>

> Uh huh. Not much of an advocate in other words - you don't put your

> money where your mouth is.

 

I'm not an "advocate". I am merely another user who is happy with Ubuntu

and wants to spread the good news because most people don't know about

it. Windows still has its uses.

>

> But I have to agree, like for many things including gaming, the Linux

> platform doesn't cut it.

 

Only gaming.

>

> People who do sound production have a similar excuse. Most of the really

> good software is on the Windows platform save the odd Mac piece.

 

I don't do sound production so I couldn't say.

>

> The Linux platform doesn't cut it. Not for games, not for sound, not for

> business

 

Works fine for my business and would work fine for most.

> and so on. About he only major success Linux has is in file and

> web file serving .. and it doesn't do any better than Windows at these,

> if. The rest of the Linux platform is and will stay sh*t.

>

> Saucy

 

Do you always have such an open mind?

 

--

Alias

To email me, remove shoes

dennis@home wrote:

>

> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

> news:fbejmp$i3h$1@aioe.org...

>

>> I have never advised anyone to switch to Ubuntu for gaming. I have

>> advised it if they are tired of the "anti piracy" crap, being prone to

>> viruses and malware, the ease of install, etc. and that it will do

>> MOST things that MOST people need.

>

> You have advised people to switch to Ubuntu without a clue as to what

> they want to do!

> So you can stop those lies as they are easy to disprove.

>

>> Just curious, why do you object to my running more than one OS? I may

>> buy a Mac. Will that bother you too?

>

> No, but I bet the Mac user group are worried.

 

Typical reply when out of ammo: insult the OS and insult the messenger

and not reply to content at all. Who taught you this amateur "debate"

technique, the other kids on the playground?

 

--

Alias

To email me, remove shoes

Alias wrote:

> Saucy wrote:

>

>> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

>> news:fbcunr$9rb$1@aioe.org...

>>

>>> Saucy wrote:

>>>

>>>> You use Windows, eh? That's rich, the Ubuntu advocate runs Windows.

>>>> Saucy

>>>

>>>

>>> LOL! I've been using windows since 92. If the gaming folks made their

>>> games for Ubuntu, I would ditch Windows in a New York second.

>>>

>>> --

>>> Alias

>>> To email me, remove shoes

>>

>>

>> Uh huh. Not much of an advocate in other words - you don't put your

>> money where your mouth is.

>

>

> I'm not an "advocate". I am merely another user who is happy with Ubuntu

> and wants to spread the good news because most people don't know about

> it. Windows still has its uses.

>

>>

>> But I have to agree, like for many things including gaming, the Linux

>> platform doesn't cut it.

>

>

> Only gaming.

>

>>

>> People who do sound production have a similar excuse. Most of the

>> really good software is on the Windows platform save the odd Mac piece.

>

>

> I don't do sound production so I couldn't say.

>

>>

>> The Linux platform doesn't cut it. Not for games, not for sound, not

>> for business

>

>

> Works fine for my business and would work fine for most.

>

>> and so on. About he only major success Linux has is in file and web

>> file serving .. and it doesn't do any better than Windows at these,

>> if. The rest of the Linux platform is and will stay sh*t.

>>

>> Saucy

>

>

> Do you always have such an open mind?

>

 

You sound like the brain washed lying lovin linux loser you are.

Now what that's about an "open mind"?

Frank

Alias wrote:

> Adam The Thread Destroyer Albright > wrote:

>

>> Alias wrote:

>>

>>> Leythos wrote:

>>>

>>>> In article <fbehkn$cc0$1@aioe.org>, iamalias@shoesgmail.com says...

>>>>

>>>>> EXCEPT FOR SOME GAMES, Ubuntu can meet the needs of most people.

>>>>> Nowadays, MOST PEOPLE play games on a console so Windows is needed

>>>>> much less nowadays than before. Personally, I hate consoles so I

>>>>> have a Windows box to play games MADE ONLY FOR WINDOWS.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> And except for nothing, Windows meets the needs of MOST PEOPLE

>>>> NOWADAYS. And the nice thing about Windows is that it doesn't

>>>> require that you have a hobby OS in order to pretend you don't need

>>>> other things.

>>>

>>>

>>> It is much better at acquiring viruses and malware.

>>>

>>>> Face it, if Ubuntu was able to do the things that MOST people need,

>>>> you would not be running Windows - as most families have kids that

>>>> play GAMES, your logic fails you and proves that you are wrong.

>>>>

>>>

>>> Most kids use PS2/3, Xbox or Wii for gaming. Where have you been,

>>> under a rock?

>>>

>>> I have never advised anyone to switch to Ubuntu for gaming. I have

>>> advised it if they are tired of the "anti piracy" crap, being prone

>>> to viruses and malware, the ease of install, etc. and that it will do

>>> MOST things that MOST people need.

>>>

>>> Just curious, why do you object to my running more than one OS? I may

>>> buy a Mac. Will that bother you too?

>>>

>>

>> <Alias, why don't you just shut the he** up. You've been made to be a

>> *fool* and a *hypocrite*. Your mo is the mo of a *fool* and a

>> *hypocrite*. I am sure I am not the only one that is seeing this.>

>

>

> Can you address the issues or merely try to shoot the messenger and miss

> every single time?

>

Sorry pal but that old line ain't gonna work in this case cause you, the

messenger, are the issue!

Frank

Alias wrote:

> dennis@home wrote:

>

>>

>> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

>> news:fbejmp$i3h$1@aioe.org...

>>

>>> I have never advised anyone to switch to Ubuntu for gaming. I have

>>> advised it if they are tired of the "anti piracy" crap, being prone

>>> to viruses and malware, the ease of install, etc. and that it will do

>>> MOST things that MOST people need.

>>

>>

>> You have advised people to switch to Ubuntu without a clue as to what

>> they want to do!

>> So you can stop those lies as they are easy to disprove.

>>

>>> Just curious, why do you object to my running more than one OS? I may

>>> buy a Mac. Will that bother you too?

>>

>>

>> No, but I bet the Mac user group are worried.

>

>

> Typical reply when out of ammo: insult the OS and insult the messenger

> and not reply to content at all.

 

You moron...how fukkin dumb are you? You are the issue and the

messenger, got it!

 

Who taught you this amateur "debate"

> technique, the other kids on the playground?

 

Who the fukk taught you to be so fukkin stupid, huh?

Lying as*hole!

Frank

>

Adam Albright wrote:

>

> Total idiot that you are, I guess you think people have time to mess

> around with DRM, WMA and UAC, blue screens, Defender, program hangs,

> random crashes, searching for drivers, Windows Explorer needs to

> close, blah, blah, blah. Damn, if you were any more stupid I wouldn't

> be able to stop laughing at your tripe.

 

Nah...that only happens to stupid drunken incompetent losers idiots like

you who can't even figure out one simple in place upgrade install of

Vista business.

>

>><In all the time I have seen people use O/S(s) in the home and work

>>environments and these are typical everyday Joe Blow users, which make

>>up the vast vast majority of computer users, I have only seen one other

>>O/S being used and that Apple, and that was being used by two people.

>>The rest were using MS, and Linux was no where to be found.>

>

>

>>It's monkey use what monkey sees.

 

You're now seeing minkies?

Call 911 immediately before you black out and hurt yourself.

OTH, never mind.

>

>

> Face facts. You're nothing but a below average troll with sh*t for

> brains. Speaking of monkeys, what did you do to so upset your mother?

>

> http://williamcalvin.com/portraits/Chimp/Arnhem%20283sml.jpg

>

Still posting pictures of your family?

Let me just say this about that...they're as butt ugly and stupid

looking as you are.

Frighting!

Frank

On Sun, 02 Sep 2007 18:34:48 -0700, Frank <fb@nospan.crm> wrote:

>Adam Albright wrote:

>

>>

>> Total idiot that you are, I guess you think people have time to mess

>> around with DRM, WMA and UAC, blue screens, Defender, program hangs,

>> random crashes, searching for drivers, Windows Explorer needs to

>> close, blah, blah, blah. Damn, if you were any more stupid I wouldn't

>> be able to stop laughing at your tripe.

>

>Nah...that only happens to stupid drunken incompetent losers idiots like

>you who can't even figure out one simple in place upgrade install of

>Vista business.

 

It must be at least the 100th time you repeated that lie already sissy

boy. Your average turnip is smarter than you are.

 

Build and more hardware Bozo? Any idiot that tries to pass himself off

as an electrical engineer like you did by claiming he "builds"

hardware when he is later forced to admit it meant he only replaced

ONE capacitor on ONE circuit board is a jackass, fool and fraud for

sure.

 

Frank working from home like he claims:

 

http://ramblingrhodes.mu.nu/archives/ass.jpg

In article <uFT77KX7HHA.464@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl>,

iamalias@shoesgmail.com. says...

> Just curious, why do you object to my using both systems, other than

> your obsession with trying to oneupmanship me? I may buy a Mac just to

> see how it is. Would that bother you too?

>

> I have never advised someone to switch to Ubuntu to play games. I have

> advised it for safer surfing, no need for ninja hardware, etc,, but not

> for gaming.

 

I don't object to you using windows - I object to your BS mantra that

Ubuntu does what most people need and they won't need windows - that it

solves their problems....

 

Clearly, just about any home with a computer also has at least one game

on it, other than what was included, and that means that any home with

kids in their teens, well, they just need Windows to play those games.

 

Now, while Ubuntu is a good BOX for browsing, email, and some other

common things, it does not give your average home with kids what they

need.

 

You seem to think that Mom and Dad are going to be able to manage a Dual

Boot system when they don't need to, they just need Windows and a little

education. As was already proven, a stupid Administrator, someone that

should know better, compromised their Ubuntu installation - so it

appears that all OS's need to have trained users.

 

Now, you can preach that Ubuntu is for the masses, but it fails the one

task - being a full replacement for something that already works.

 

--

 

Leythos

- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.

- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a

drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"

spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)

In article <fbeo2m$u4b$1@aioe.org>, iamalias@shoesgmail.com says...

> Can you address the issues or merely try to shoot the messenger and miss

> every single time?

>

 

You are the issue Alias - preaching that Ubuntu is the salvation for the

masses, yet you don't tell them about it's failings that keep you

running Windows.

 

That means that you are the issue, telling lies without concern,

screwing people that don't know any better.

 

--

 

Leythos

- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.

- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a

drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"

spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)

In article <uBcoTRX7HHA.5012@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl>,

iamalias@shoesgmail.com. says...

> So, once again, it's a indisputable fact that WPA and WGA do NOTHING to

> stop piracy and ONLY inconvenience paying customers. Live with it. Oh, I

> forgot, you LIKE living with it :-)

 

Wrong, it stopped Piracy, once the pirate was exposed the police were

able to stop him - without WPA/WGA it would never have been stopped.

 

--

 

Leythos

- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.

- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a

drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"

spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)

In article <fbekn7$k9e$2@aioe.org>, nonee@none.not says...

> I'm just saying that you can do it for alot less with linux because you

> don't need to shell out lots of $ for the OS.

 

When it comes down to it, there is little cost difference if you want

support - check it out yourself, there is little ROI for going to Linux.

 

--

 

Leythos

- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.

- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a

drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"

spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)

In article <fbekso$k9e$3@aioe.org>, nonee@none.not says...

> And I still disagree with you because of all of the

> "you as a paying customer are guilty until proven innocent (IF our buggy

> DRM doesn't screw up) until our checks indicate otherwise" treatment

> from MS.

 

I'm not proven anything - I'm asked to validate a license, like many

other apps that are not MS's, and it's been around longer than MS was

doing it.

 

Only people that suspect themselves as being guilty have your disease.

 

--

 

Leythos

- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.

- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a

drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"

spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)

In article <fbfih4$6kj$1@aioe.org>, iamalias@shoesgmail.com says...

> I'm not an "advocate". I am merely another user who is happy with Ubuntu

> and wants to spread the good news because most people don't know about

> it. Windows still has its uses.

 

You are advocating that people switch to Ubuntu, you have done it many

times in this group and the XP groups, but you failed, each time, to

tell them that you continue to run Windows because Ubuntu doesn't

provide all that you need. Funny thing is that you also failed to tell

them that Windows does all that you need, you are just paranoid.

 

So, windows does all that most users (home and corporate) need, in fact,

it does more than Ubuntu can deliver. Fact is that home users would have

to Dual Boot or have two computers if they listened to your Use Ubuntu,

it's all you need and will be simple....

 

--

 

Leythos

- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.

- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a

drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"

spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)

Adam Albright wrote:

> On Sun, 02 Sep 2007 09:39:04 -0700, Frank <fb@nospan.crm> wrote:

>

>

>>Adam Albright wrote:

>

>

>>>You're nothing but a fu*king idiot Frank. You'll never be anything

>>>else. I pity you.

>>>

>>

>>hehehe...if you had half the brains and intelligence you think or want

>>to have you'd still be a half brained moron.

>>Did you even bother to read you own ignorant response to me? You who

>>told us all that you were a paid lying accountant of some blood sucking

>>attorneys...I guess you didn't retire but in reality you got fired for

>>your incompetence.

>>Find the part where you contradicted yourself and blew your own logic

>>out of the water.

>>I strongly suggest you pity only your own stupid idiotic self.

>>Frank

>

>

> I never told you any such thing your ignorant dickwad. I said I worked

> for one of the major unions in the AFL-CIO and part of my JOB was to

> testify as to the results of audits where certain employers failed to

> make the required contributions to their contractual obligations to

> welfare and pension funds which is regulated under federal law under

> ERISA.

>

> You being the fuc*ing idiot you always are tried to twist that into

> saying I was a paid liar for attorneys.

>

> You're nothing but low class sleaze Frank. Pond scum. That's all you

> are. A lowlife always lying no account loser since it is becoming

> increasingly obvious you must be deranged.

>

hehehe...you're not doing a very good job of back pedaling you lying

scumbag account.

We all know of your "court room tactics" you've bragged about so many

times in this ng. Getting on the stand and lying for a bunch of blood

sucking attorneys, so you've bragged. Nobody believed you when you

testified did they? They saw right thru your drunken delusional bullsh*t

lies, didn't they.

Well, that same "court room tactic " obviously isn't working in here either.

So go screw yourself as we're all onto your stupid, condescending, lying

big mouth bullsh*t act.

And one other thing...I'd strongly suggest that when you leave that

basement you're currently in you keep your big fat lying mouth shut

least you run into someone like me who'll shut it for you.

As*hole!

Frank

Alias wrote:

> Frank wrote:

>

>> Alias wrote:

>>

>>> Frank wrote:

>>>

>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> Frank wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> The fact that you're guilty until you prove otherwise over and

>>>>>>> over again makes you feel like what?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>> You know, I still get the idea that maybe you've got wants &

>>>>>> warrants out for your sorry ass in the good'o US of A. You can't

>>>>>> use your real name (or maybe you're ashamed of it?) and you feel

>>>>>> like a thief all the time according to your postings.

>>>>>> What is that all about? Are you a thief? I've never heard anyone

>>>>>> else except you say you feel like a thief concerning Windows.

>>>>>> I'm sure it's proly just a Freudian slip of sorts right?

>>>>>> You're not a thief right?

>>>>>> Just curious.

>>>>>> Frank

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Um, you're the one who continually brings up warrants and being

>>>>> wanted by the law. I'm sure it's proly just a Freudian slip of

>>>>> sorts right?

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Afraid to answer the question? I live in America. I promise not to

>>>> turn you in, ok?

>>>> Frank

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>> So, you're wanted in some other country and are hiding in LA LA Land.

>>> I have explained how it is impossible for me to be wanted but you,

>>> conveniently, ignored those posts. Besides, if I were wanted by the

>>> USA legal authorities, do you think I would be posting on Usenet?

>>>

>>

>> hahaha...I seriously doubt very much that the USA authorities are

>> looking for anyone named "alias"...lol!

>

>

> Ever hear of an IP address? You, again, ignore why it is impossible that

> the US authorities are looking for me.

 

Oh? They're looking for a person by the name of "alias"?

I don't think so!

Try again.

 

Again, sigh, one has to have a

> passport to travel overseas to Spain. I have been here for almost twenty

> years. Passports expire in ten years, ergo, I needed to renew it and

> they do an FBI, Interpol and IRS check on any and all passport

> applications. You can apologize anytime you're man enough which will

> probably be never.

 

Oh please...don't give me that bs. Fake ID's were a dime a dozen in

spain, italy, france, etc., 20 yrs ago and you know it.

Bribing authorities in a lawless, corrupt 3rd world country like spain

20 yrs ago was common.

Very common.

>> Oh, btw, "La La Land" is an LA (Los Angeles) reference.

>> Frank

>

>

> Specifically, yes, generally, it means Southern California.

 

Nope...wrong again! Southern California is a very big area and LA is

just one part of it.

La La Land is only an LA (Los Angeles) reference.

Try again.

Frank

>

Adam Albright wrote:

> On Sun, 2 Sep 2007 10:27:09 -0400, Leythos <void@nowhere.lan> wrote:

>

>

>

>>>Assuming all your paying customers to be running pirated copies of

>>>Windows until they prove otherwise only shows the disdain that MS holds

>>>for their paying customers. The hate is squarely on MS' shoulders.

>>

>>No, the hate is on your shoulders and those of the zealots of you that

>>don't believe in a company protecting ITS PRODUCT.

>

>

> You clueless putz, then explain why it is alright with Bill Gates that

> not only looks the other way, he openly encourages the Chinese to

> outright steal Windows in the hope at some time in the future they may

> buy it. Ditto for Eastern Europe countries.

>

> I don't have the exact figure handy, but if I recall correctly there

> was a recent article in one of the trade magazines is something like

> all of 200 copies of Vista are registered to Chinese mainland

> owners... with who knows how many millions of pirated copies in use.

> That sure doesn't sound like Microsoft is "protecting" it's product.

>

> What Microsoft is really doing is trying to squeeze Joe Six Pack in

> America to make up the difference for loss sales in poorer countries.

> I guess you're one of the dopes that doesn't mind having his pocket

> picketed by Microsoft while they give a wink and nod to someone doing

> it on a grand scale offshore.

>

> I really enjoy exposing loud mouth blowhards like you that never know

> what the hell their blubbering about. I really, really do!

>

>>Fact is that not one single customer, not one single person I know, not

>>even myself, feel that being asked to validate is an issue, not a

>>problem, nothing, it's a fact of piracy protection and it works.

>

>

> You're full of crap as I just illustrated. The issue which you

> conveniently ignore is last weekend's disaster when valid and fully

> licensed and activated copies of Vista were marked as counterfeit by

> Microsoft. There simply is no excuse for such reckless conduct.

> Especially by the world's biggest software company. If they can't even

> program a server right, what does that really say about how well they

> wrote Vista?

>

>>>I have said this before and I will say it again: MS made BILLIONS with

>>>DRM free Windows. Most people are honest and will buy Windows, otherwise

>>>MS wouldn't have made BILLIONS with pre-XP Windows.

>>

>>And that doesn't change a thing - Windows is still a great product, runs

>>more anything than Ubuntu, and you even continue to use it and you even

>>have Vista now - why means that you are exposed as a Hypocrite and liar.

>

>

> You meanwhile are just another hot headed Microsoft zealot that

> doesn't have a clue what he's jabbering about.

>

 

 

hehehe...what a fukkin diatribe! Do you ever read the bs you write? If

you did wouldn't you come to the same conclusion you do about ever other

post you respond to saying..."you are just another hot headed idiot that

doesn't have a clue what you're jabbering about".

Wonderful!

Frank