dennis@home wrote:

>

> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

> news:fbjtgk$968$1@aioe.org...

>

>> Well, a friend of mine and I have convinced dozens of Windows users to

>> become Ubuntu users and you have convinced zero Ubuntu users to switch

>> to Windows. ALL of them, without exception, tell us they are much

>> happier with Ubuntu than Windows. For the few who did games, we set up

>> a dual boot with XP. Most don't do games.

>

>

> You need to do some research so you aren't so ignorant.. hint.. most

> Linux installs are abandoned.

 

My, my, more lies, insults and bluster. This is getting boring.

 

--

Alias

To email me, remove shoes

dennis@home wrote:

>

> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

> news:fbjipu$91f$2@aioe.org...

>

>> ONE thing: gaming.

>>

>

> It only takes one thing.. in your case it is games.. you still don't

> advise the "ignorant" potential Ubuntu users that it may not, no

> probably will not do everything they want. They find out just after

> Ubuntu has deleted windows and their recovery partition. I expect your

> advice has cost people money and you are lucky they don't try and get it

> back from you.

 

More lies, insults and bluster. Ho hum.

 

--

Alias

To email me, remove shoes

dennis@home wrote:

>

> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

> news:fbjhng$58h$1@aioe.org...

>> Leythos wrote:

>>> In article <fbjg3s$cn$1@aioe.org>, iamalias@shoesgmail.com says...

>>>> Leythos wrote:

>>>>> In article <fbgia1$q8q$2@aioe.org>, iamalias@shoesgmail.com says...

>>>>>> Leythos wrote:

>>>>>>> In article <uBcoTRX7HHA.5012@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl>,

>>>>>>> iamalias@shoesgmail.com. says...

>>>>>>>> So, once again, it's a indisputable fact that WPA and WGA do

>>>>>>>> NOTHING to stop piracy and ONLY inconvenience paying customers.

>>>>>>>> Live with it. Oh, I forgot, you LIKE living with it :-)

>>>>>>> Wrong, it stopped Piracy, once the pirate was exposed the police

>>>>>>> were able to stop him - without WPA/WGA it would never have been

>>>>>>> stopped.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>> Does this mean you are conceding all the other points I made that

>>>>>> you snipped? One case where WGA worked does not stop piracy.

>>>>>> Piracy is more rampant now than it was ten years ago.

>>>>> No, I snipped what wasn't needed - WGA and WPA does work, just not

>>>>> a complete solution, but it does stop piracy in many cases.

>>>>>

>>>> It inconveniences paying customers MUCH more, MILLIONS more, times

>>>> than it catches any pirates.

>>

>> No answer from Leythos. Everyone act surprised.

>

> I expect more people are surprised by you..

> Piracy does happen.. I have been offered M$ office preinstalled for £10

> on a system I was buying.

> Do you think it was a real copy for that price?

> Maybe they thought I was a crook because I didn't want windows on it?

>

> Probably unlike many of the buyers of Dell linux systems who then put a

> dodgy version of windows on them I really did want it for Unix and its

> probably still running it now (it was sold on so I don't know).

>

> You fail to tell people that nearly all Linux downloads and installs are

> abandoned.. you really should tell these "ignorant" users that you are

> informing about Ubuntu that most people give up just so they know it may

> be a waste of time.

>

> 8<

>

>

>> The LAST thing I need when a NIC isn't behaving properly is to have to

>> activate FOUR bloody times and then have to call Morocco in order to

>> use MY computer. When that happened, I made the decision to learn

>> Ubuntu and I found out about Ubuntu on this very news group. Yeah,

>> you're right I don't like it and I am not alone. Only logic impaired

>> fools like you accept it as "normal".

>

> So you get a duff NIC and everything is windows fault.

 

The NIC didn't tell me, erroneously, that I had a pirated copy of

Windows, Windows did. So, yes, it's Windows' fault.

 

--

Alias

To email me, remove shoes

"Pete Stavrakoglou" <ntotrr@optonline.net> wrote in message

news:eJ1qSxv7HHA.1184@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

 

8< alias stuff

> What is your idea of real work? The company I work for uses XP now and

> used NT before that. Both OSs are very stable and we do real work here.

> I've been using XP at home since it's release and I give it quite a

> workout. A lot of database work, spreadsheets, photo processing, etc. It

> has been extremely stable. I cannot remember when the OS crashed, it's

> been that long. I've recently bought a Mac laptop for my son and I've

> taken the eight-month desktop I bought him. The hardware in that is newer

> than the hardware in my homebuilt system and it run Vista. Thus far, I've

> got no complaints about Vista. It is extremely stable running Photoshop

> CS3, Office 2007, WordPerfect Office X3, Nikon Capture NX, Sigma Photo

> Pro, Olympus Studio, and a host of other apps. For my work, Windows is

> stable and suits my needs. All of my hardware works, I can't see myself

> going through the hoops you have to using Linux to get hardware to work.

>

 

Now you have done it.. you can't list that many applications that don't run

on Linux and expect to get away with it. -)

Alias wrote:

> Frank wrote:

>

>> Alias wrote:

>>

>>> Frank wrote:

>>>

>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> It's likely that Office 2007 doesn't work with their school.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Why would that "be likely"?

>>>> Frank

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>> Because of something you don't have: common sense.

>>>

>>

>> Fukk!!!

>

>

> No thanks.

>

>> That is the most outrageously remark I've ever heard form you (well,

>> to date anyway).

>

>

> Make your day_

>

>> You my friend, are totally devoid of any semblance of "common sense",

>

>

> LOL! This from Mr Lies, Insults and Bluster.

>

>> which, btw, is not at all common.

>> Frank

>

>

> When you decide to stop using worn out clichés, let me know.

>

 

 

And when you decide to start telling the truth...please lets us all

know, ok?

Frank

Alias wrote:

> dennis@home wrote:

>

>>

>> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

>> news:fbjrdg$316$1@aioe.org...

>>

>>> Most users think they have a solution because their computer came

>>> bundled with McAfee or Norton. Most users do not read these groups or

>>> any other technical web sites. Just because they are not spending

>>> their time researching how to maintain a computer, doesn't mean

>>> they're stupid. It means they have better things to do. With Ubuntu,

>>> there is no need to do this research because it's, compared to

>>> Windows, practically bullet proof.

>>

>>

>> However as you have been told in the past it is *not* bullet proof and

>> you have only your own ignorance if you do not research it and find

>> out why many people are telling you that you are *wrong*.

>

>

> Reading comprehension problem? I wrote: "practically bullet proof".

>

>> The last time I looked there were tens of unfixed vulnerabilities in

>> Ubuntu, probably more than in Vista.

>

>

> Keep telling yourself that lie.

>

>> If you haven't been exploited with an attitude like yours it will be

>> more luck than skill.

>

>

> Ah, the unfounded insult. Can't you do better than that?

>

>>

>> You had best use Google to find how to check your box for exploits and

>> see if you need to fix them.

>

>

> No need to Google as I already know how.

>

>>

>> In the mean time I suggest that less knowledgeable users than yourself

>> would be better off using some of the better security tools on windows

>> as they do the work you will have to do manually if you want to be

>> certain you have not been compromised.

>

>

> Sure, pull the other one, it has bells on it.

>

>>

>> BTW you are running a separate hardware based firewall with logging so

>> you can easily check for exploits running on your machines or do you

>> plan on doing it the hard way?

>

>

> I can see you don't understand the architecture of Linux. Try Google.

 

What a fukkin as*hole loser you've become!

I guess that is your real persona huh?

Frank

Alias wrote:

> dennis@home wrote:

>

>>

>> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

>> news:fbjilc$91f$1@aioe.org...

>>

>>>

>>> The word you want is "ignorant" because they don't know any better.

>>> Just because someone's intelligent doesn't mean they are aware of

>>> everything.

>>>

>>

>> What is the word when someone is not ignorant of the facts but still

>> pushes it to everyone and anyone without any thought as to if it will

>> do what they need?

>> Stupid and malicious are a couple that spring to mind.

>> I suppose that the PC people would classify you as learning deficient

>> as it hasn't sunk in yet and doesn't look like it will.

>

>

> More lies, insults and bluster. Trying to be like Frank?

>

 

 

He's completely nailed your "stupid and malicious" ass, which perfectly

describes the act you've been doing in this ng from day one.

That you know it and we all know it makes you a really despicable human

being.

Frank

Alias wrote:

> dennis@home wrote:

>

>>

>> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

>> news:fbjhng$58h$1@aioe.org...

>>

>>> Leythos wrote:

>>>

>>>> In article <fbjg3s$cn$1@aioe.org>, iamalias@shoesgmail.com says...

>>>>

>>>>> Leythos wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> In article <fbgia1$q8q$2@aioe.org>, iamalias@shoesgmail.com says...

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Leythos wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> In article <uBcoTRX7HHA.5012@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl>,

>>>>>>>> iamalias@shoesgmail.com. says...

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> So, once again, it's a indisputable fact that WPA and WGA do

>>>>>>>>> NOTHING to stop piracy and ONLY inconvenience paying customers.

>>>>>>>>> Live with it. Oh, I forgot, you LIKE living with it :-)

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Wrong, it stopped Piracy, once the pirate was exposed the police

>>>>>>>> were able to stop him - without WPA/WGA it would never have been

>>>>>>>> stopped.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Does this mean you are conceding all the other points I made that

>>>>>>> you snipped? One case where WGA worked does not stop piracy.

>>>>>>> Piracy is more rampant now than it was ten years ago.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> No, I snipped what wasn't needed - WGA and WPA does work, just not

>>>>>> a complete solution, but it does stop piracy in many cases.

>>>>>>

>>>>> It inconveniences paying customers MUCH more, MILLIONS more, times

>>>>> than it catches any pirates.

>>>

>>>

>>> No answer from Leythos. Everyone act surprised.

>>

>>

>> I expect more people are surprised by you..

>> Piracy does happen.. I have been offered M$ office preinstalled for

>> £10 on a system I was buying.

>> Do you think it was a real copy for that price?

>> Maybe they thought I was a crook because I didn't want windows on it?

>>

>> Probably unlike many of the buyers of Dell linux systems who then put

>> a dodgy version of windows on them I really did want it for Unix and

>> its probably still running it now (it was sold on so I don't know).

>>

>> You fail to tell people that nearly all Linux downloads and installs

>> are abandoned.. you really should tell these "ignorant" users that you

>> are informing about Ubuntu that most people give up just so they know

>> it may be a waste of time.

>>

>> 8<

>>

>>

>>> The LAST thing I need when a NIC isn't behaving properly is to have

>>> to activate FOUR bloody times and then have to call Morocco in order

>>> to use MY computer. When that happened, I made the decision to learn

>>> Ubuntu and I found out about Ubuntu on this very news group. Yeah,

>>> you're right I don't like it and I am not alone. Only logic impaired

>>> fools like you accept it as "normal".

>>

>>

>> So you get a duff NIC and everything is windows fault.

>

>

> The NIC didn't tell me, erroneously, that I had a pirated copy of

> Windows, Windows did. So, yes, it's Windows' fault.

>

 

More lies?

When will you cease your incessant lying?

Frank

Frank wrote:

> Alias wrote:

>> Frank wrote:

>>

>>> Alias wrote:

>>>

>>>> Frank wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> Alias wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> It's likely that Office 2007 doesn't work with their school.

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Why would that "be likely"?

>>>>> Frank

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Because of something you don't have: common sense.

>>>>

>>>

>>> Fukk!!!

>>

>>

>> No thanks.

>>

>>> That is the most outrageously remark I've ever heard form you (well,

>>> to date anyway).

>>

>>

>> Make your day_

>>

>>> You my friend, are totally devoid of any semblance of "common sense",

>>

>>

>> LOL! This from Mr Lies, Insults and Bluster.

>>

>>> which, btw, is not at all common.

>>> Frank

>>

>>

>> When you decide to stop using worn out clichés, let me know.

>>

>

>

> And when you decide to start telling the truth...please lets us all

> know, ok?

> Frank

 

This from Mr Liar, Insulter and Blusterer!

 

LOL!

 

--

Alias

To email me, remove shoes

Frank wrote:

> Alias wrote:

>

>> dennis@home wrote:

>>

>>>

>>> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

>>> news:fbjrdg$316$1@aioe.org...

>>>

>>>> Most users think they have a solution because their computer came

>>>> bundled with McAfee or Norton. Most users do not read these groups

>>>> or any other technical web sites. Just because they are not spending

>>>> their time researching how to maintain a computer, doesn't mean

>>>> they're stupid. It means they have better things to do. With Ubuntu,

>>>> there is no need to do this research because it's, compared to

>>>> Windows, practically bullet proof.

>>>

>>>

>>> However as you have been told in the past it is *not* bullet proof

>>> and you have only your own ignorance if you do not research it and

>>> find out why many people are telling you that you are *wrong*.

>>

>>

>> Reading comprehension problem? I wrote: "practically bullet proof".

>>

>>> The last time I looked there were tens of unfixed vulnerabilities in

>>> Ubuntu, probably more than in Vista.

>>

>>

>> Keep telling yourself that lie.

>>

>>> If you haven't been exploited with an attitude like yours it will be

>>> more luck than skill.

>>

>>

>> Ah, the unfounded insult. Can't you do better than that?

>>

>>>

>>> You had best use Google to find how to check your box for exploits

>>> and see if you need to fix them.

>>

>>

>> No need to Google as I already know how.

>>

>>>

>>> In the mean time I suggest that less knowledgeable users than

>>> yourself would be better off using some of the better security tools

>>> on windows as they do the work you will have to do manually if you

>>> want to be certain you have not been compromised.

>>

>>

>> Sure, pull the other one, it has bells on it.

>>

>>>

>>> BTW you are running a separate hardware based firewall with logging

>>> so you can easily check for exploits running on your machines or do

>>> you plan on doing it the hard way?

>>

>>

>> I can see you don't understand the architecture of Linux. Try Google.

>

> What a fukkin as*hole loser you've become!

> I guess that is your real persona huh?

> Frank

 

LOL! This from Mr Liar, Insulter and Blusterer!

 

--

Alias

To email me, remove shoes

Frank wrote:

> Alias wrote:

>

>> dennis@home wrote:

>>

>>>

>>> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

>>> news:fbjilc$91f$1@aioe.org...

>>>

>>>>

>>>> The word you want is "ignorant" because they don't know any better.

>>>> Just because someone's intelligent doesn't mean they are aware of

>>>> everything.

>>>>

>>>

>>> What is the word when someone is not ignorant of the facts but still

>>> pushes it to everyone and anyone without any thought as to if it will

>>> do what they need?

>>> Stupid and malicious are a couple that spring to mind.

>>> I suppose that the PC people would classify you as learning deficient

>>> as it hasn't sunk in yet and doesn't look like it will.

>>

>>

>> More lies, insults and bluster. Trying to be like Frank?

>>

>

>

> He's completely nailed your "stupid and malicious" ass,

 

Lie and insult.

 

: which perfectly

> describes the act you've been doing in this ng from day one.

 

Bluster.

> That you know it and we all know it makes you a really despicable human

> being.

> Frank

 

Another lie and another insult.

 

As predictable as the tide ...

 

--

Alias

To email me, remove shoes

Frank wrote:

> Alias wrote:

>

>> dennis@home wrote:

>>

>>>

>>> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

>>> news:fbjhng$58h$1@aioe.org...

>>>

>>>> Leythos wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> In article <fbjg3s$cn$1@aioe.org>, iamalias@shoesgmail.com says...

>>>>>

>>>>>> Leythos wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> In article <fbgia1$q8q$2@aioe.org>, iamalias@shoesgmail.com says...

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Leythos wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> In article <uBcoTRX7HHA.5012@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl>,

>>>>>>>>> iamalias@shoesgmail.com. says...

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> So, once again, it's a indisputable fact that WPA and WGA do

>>>>>>>>>> NOTHING to stop piracy and ONLY inconvenience paying

>>>>>>>>>> customers. Live with it. Oh, I forgot, you LIKE living with it

>>>>>>>>>> :-)

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Wrong, it stopped Piracy, once the pirate was exposed the

>>>>>>>>> police were able to stop him - without WPA/WGA it would never

>>>>>>>>> have been stopped.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Does this mean you are conceding all the other points I made

>>>>>>>> that you snipped? One case where WGA worked does not stop

>>>>>>>> piracy. Piracy is more rampant now than it was ten years ago.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> No, I snipped what wasn't needed - WGA and WPA does work, just

>>>>>>> not a complete solution, but it does stop piracy in many cases.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>> It inconveniences paying customers MUCH more, MILLIONS more, times

>>>>>> than it catches any pirates.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> No answer from Leythos. Everyone act surprised.

>>>

>>>

>>> I expect more people are surprised by you..

>>> Piracy does happen.. I have been offered M$ office preinstalled for

>>> £10 on a system I was buying.

>>> Do you think it was a real copy for that price?

>>> Maybe they thought I was a crook because I didn't want windows on it?

>>>

>>> Probably unlike many of the buyers of Dell linux systems who then put

>>> a dodgy version of windows on them I really did want it for Unix and

>>> its probably still running it now (it was sold on so I don't know).

>>>

>>> You fail to tell people that nearly all Linux downloads and installs

>>> are abandoned.. you really should tell these "ignorant" users that

>>> you are informing about Ubuntu that most people give up just so they

>>> know it may be a waste of time.

>>>

>>> 8<

>>>

>>>

>>>> The LAST thing I need when a NIC isn't behaving properly is to have

>>>> to activate FOUR bloody times and then have to call Morocco in order

>>>> to use MY computer. When that happened, I made the decision to learn

>>>> Ubuntu and I found out about Ubuntu on this very news group. Yeah,

>>>> you're right I don't like it and I am not alone. Only logic impaired

>>>> fools like you accept it as "normal".

>>>

>>>

>>> So you get a duff NIC and everything is windows fault.

>>

>>

>> The NIC didn't tell me, erroneously, that I had a pirated copy of

>> Windows, Windows did. So, yes, it's Windows' fault.

>>

>

> More lies?

> When will you cease your incessant lying?

> Frank

 

LOL! And this is from Mr Liar, Insulter and Blusterer!

 

--

Alias

To email me, remove shoes

"Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

news:fbltmr$i31$8@aioe.org...

> More lies,

 

Well yes, we know that you lie.. there is enough documented proof in this NG

to show that.

Adding lie to the list of lies isn't helping.

 

> insults and bluster.

 

You may think that calling a description of your behavior as insults and

bluster makes it OK but others don't.

It makes you appear to be irrational and untrustworthy.

Alias wrote:

> Frank wrote:

>

>> Alias wrote:

>>

>>> dennis@home wrote:

>>>

>>>>

>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

>>>> news:fbjilc$91f$1@aioe.org...

>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> The word you want is "ignorant" because they don't know any better.

>>>>> Just because someone's intelligent doesn't mean they are aware of

>>>>> everything.

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> What is the word when someone is not ignorant of the facts but still

>>>> pushes it to everyone and anyone without any thought as to if it

>>>> will do what they need?

>>>> Stupid and malicious are a couple that spring to mind.

>>>> I suppose that the PC people would classify you as learning

>>>> deficient as it hasn't sunk in yet and doesn't look like it will.

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>> More lies, insults and bluster. Trying to be like Frank?

>>>

>>

>>

>> He's completely nailed your "stupid and malicious" ass,

>

>

> Lie and insult.

>

> : which perfectly

>

>> describes the act you've been doing in this ng from day one.

>

>

> Bluster.

>

>> That you know it and we all know it makes you a really despicable

>> human being.

>> Frank

>

>

> Another lie and another insult.

>

> As predictable as the tide ...

>

 

Proof for the entire ng that you know you post stupid and malicious

postings makes you a really despicable human being!

I guess that is your goal in this ng.

Well congratulations! You've achieved your goal.

Frank

"Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

news:fbltlj$i31$7@aioe.org...

> dennis@home wrote:

>>

>> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

>> news:fbjrdg$316$1@aioe.org...

>>

>>> Most users think they have a solution because their computer came

>>> bundled with McAfee or Norton. Most users do not read these groups or

>>> any other technical web sites. Just because they are not spending their

>>> time researching how to maintain a computer, doesn't mean they're

>>> stupid. It means they have better things to do. With Ubuntu, there is no

>>> need to do this research because it's, compared to Windows, practically

>>> bullet proof.

>>

>> However as you have been told in the past it is *not* bullet proof and

>> you have only your own ignorance if you do not research it and find out

>> why many people are telling you that you are *wrong*.

>

> Reading comprehension problem? I wrote: "practically bullet proof".

>

>> The last time I looked there were tens of unfixed vulnerabilities in

>> Ubuntu, probably more than in Vista.

>

> Keep telling yourself that lie.

>

>> If you haven't been exploited with an attitude like yours it will be more

>> luck than skill.

>

> Ah, the unfounded insult. Can't you do better than that?

>

>>

>> You had best use Google to find how to check your box for exploits and

>> see if you need to fix them.

>

> No need to Google as I already know how.

 

You know how but refuse to accept that the problem exists.

Is it a surprise to you that noone thinks you know anything about linux?

 

>> In the mean time I suggest that less knowledgeable users than yourself

>> would be better off using some of the better security tools on windows as

>> they do the work you will have to do manually if you want to be certain

>> you have not been compromised.

>

> Sure, pull the other one, it has bells on it.

 

More evidence you know nothing about linux and anything you recommend can be

ignored quite safely.

>> BTW you are running a separate hardware based firewall with logging so

>> you can easily check for exploits running on your machines or do you plan

>> on doing it the hard way?

>

> I can see you don't understand the architecture of Linux. Try Google.

 

I can see you have never written any kernel code in any Unix.

I have BTW and I do know quite a bit more than you about Linux and some

other better flavors of kernel.

You just repeat what some Linux guy has told you and lack the basic skills

to know he was lying or at best wrong just like you.

 

As for Google you wouldn't know which bit to ignore even if it flashed in

red lights saying this is wrong.. that's the trouble with the WWW its full

of cr@p and users like you can't tell the difference between the cr@p and

the good stuff and just propagate the cr@p.

"Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

news:fblts4$i31$11@aioe.org...

> The NIC didn't tell me, erroneously, that I had a pirated copy of Windows,

> Windows did. So, yes, it's Windows' fault.

 

I bet windows didn't tell you that either.. it probably said you may be

running a pirated copy and to please verify it.

Alias wrote:

> Frank wrote:

>

>> Alias wrote:

>>

>>> dennis@home wrote:

>>>

>>>>

>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

>>>> news:fbjhng$58h$1@aioe.org...

>>>>

>>>>> Leythos wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> In article <fbjg3s$cn$1@aioe.org>, iamalias@shoesgmail.com says...

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Leythos wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> In article <fbgia1$q8q$2@aioe.org>, iamalias@shoesgmail.com says...

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Leythos wrote:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> In article <uBcoTRX7HHA.5012@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl>,

>>>>>>>>>> iamalias@shoesgmail.com. says...

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> So, once again, it's a indisputable fact that WPA and WGA do

>>>>>>>>>>> NOTHING to stop piracy and ONLY inconvenience paying

>>>>>>>>>>> customers. Live with it. Oh, I forgot, you LIKE living with

>>>>>>>>>>> it :-)

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Wrong, it stopped Piracy, once the pirate was exposed the

>>>>>>>>>> police were able to stop him - without WPA/WGA it would never

>>>>>>>>>> have been stopped.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Does this mean you are conceding all the other points I made

>>>>>>>>> that you snipped? One case where WGA worked does not stop

>>>>>>>>> piracy. Piracy is more rampant now than it was ten years ago.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> No, I snipped what wasn't needed - WGA and WPA does work, just

>>>>>>>> not a complete solution, but it does stop piracy in many cases.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> It inconveniences paying customers MUCH more, MILLIONS more,

>>>>>>> times than it catches any pirates.

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> No answer from Leythos. Everyone act surprised.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> I expect more people are surprised by you..

>>>> Piracy does happen.. I have been offered M$ office preinstalled for

>>>> £10 on a system I was buying.

>>>> Do you think it was a real copy for that price?

>>>> Maybe they thought I was a crook because I didn't want windows on it?

>>>>

>>>> Probably unlike many of the buyers of Dell linux systems who then

>>>> put a dodgy version of windows on them I really did want it for Unix

>>>> and its probably still running it now (it was sold on so I don't know).

>>>>

>>>> You fail to tell people that nearly all Linux downloads and installs

>>>> are abandoned.. you really should tell these "ignorant" users that

>>>> you are informing about Ubuntu that most people give up just so they

>>>> know it may be a waste of time.

>>>>

>>>> 8<

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>> The LAST thing I need when a NIC isn't behaving properly is to have

>>>>> to activate FOUR bloody times and then have to call Morocco in

>>>>> order to use MY computer. When that happened, I made the decision

>>>>> to learn Ubuntu and I found out about Ubuntu on this very news

>>>>> group. Yeah, you're right I don't like it and I am not alone. Only

>>>>> logic impaired fools like you accept it as "normal".

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> So you get a duff NIC and everything is windows fault.

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>> The NIC didn't tell me, erroneously, that I had a pirated copy of

>>> Windows, Windows did. So, yes, it's Windows' fault.

>>>

>>

>> More lies?

>> When will you cease your incessant lying?

>> Frank

>

>

> LOL! And this is from Mr Liar, Insulter and Blusterer!

>

Projecting again?

Stop lying!

Frank

dennis@home wrote:

>

> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

> news:fbltlj$i31$7@aioe.org...

>> dennis@home wrote:

>>>

>>> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

>>> news:fbjrdg$316$1@aioe.org...

>>>

>>>> Most users think they have a solution because their computer came

>>>> bundled with McAfee or Norton. Most users do not read these groups

>>>> or any other technical web sites. Just because they are not spending

>>>> their time researching how to maintain a computer, doesn't mean

>>>> they're stupid. It means they have better things to do. With Ubuntu,

>>>> there is no need to do this research because it's, compared to

>>>> Windows, practically bullet proof.

>>>

>>> However as you have been told in the past it is *not* bullet proof

>>> and you have only your own ignorance if you do not research it and

>>> find out why many people are telling you that you are *wrong*.

>>

>> Reading comprehension problem? I wrote: "practically bullet proof".

>>

>>> The last time I looked there were tens of unfixed vulnerabilities in

>>> Ubuntu, probably more than in Vista.

>>

>> Keep telling yourself that lie.

>>

>>> If you haven't been exploited with an attitude like yours it will be

>>> more luck than skill.

>>

>> Ah, the unfounded insult. Can't you do better than that?

>>

>>>

>>> You had best use Google to find how to check your box for exploits

>>> and see if you need to fix them.

>>

>> No need to Google as I already know how.

>

> You know how but refuse to accept that the problem exists.

> Is it a surprise to you that noone thinks you know anything about linux?

>

>

>>> In the mean time I suggest that less knowledgeable users than

>>> yourself would be better off using some of the better security tools

>>> on windows as they do the work you will have to do manually if you

>>> want to be certain you have not been compromised.

>>

>> Sure, pull the other one, it has bells on it.

>

> More evidence you know nothing about linux and anything you recommend

> can be ignored quite safely.

>

>>> BTW you are running a separate hardware based firewall with logging

>>> so you can easily check for exploits running on your machines or do

>>> you plan on doing it the hard way?

>>

>> I can see you don't understand the architecture of Linux. Try Google.

>

> I can see you have never written any kernel code in any Unix.

> I have BTW and I do know quite a bit more than you about Linux and some

> other better flavors of kernel.

> You just repeat what some Linux guy has told you and lack the basic

> skills to know he was lying or at best wrong just like you.

>

> As for Google you wouldn't know which bit to ignore even if it flashed

> in red lights saying this is wrong.. that's the trouble with the WWW its

> full of cr@p and users like you can't tell the difference between the

> cr@p and the good stuff and just propagate the cr@p.

 

Sigh, more lies, insults, bragging and bluster. Ho hum.

 

--

Alias

To email me, remove shoes

dennis@home wrote:

>

> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

> news:fblts4$i31$11@aioe.org...

>

>> The NIC didn't tell me, erroneously, that I had a pirated copy of

>> Windows, Windows did. So, yes, it's Windows' fault.

>

> I bet windows didn't tell you that either.. it probably said you may be

> running a pirated copy and to please verify it.

 

Same thing. I had to call Morocco to get permission to use something I

paid for. You may think that normal but I prefer to control my own

computer and not need permission from *anybody* to use what I paid for.

 

--

Alias

To email me, remove shoes

On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 10:03:20 -0700, Frank <fb@nospan.crm> wrote:

>Alias wrote:

>

>> When you decide to stop using worn out clichés, let me know.

>And when you decide to start telling the truth...please lets us all

>know, ok?

>Frank

 

That from the newsgroup's biggest liar. Priceless!

On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 10:58:14 -0700, Frank <fb@nospan.crm> wrote:

>Proof for the entire ng that you know you post stupid and malicious

>postings makes you a really despicable human being!

>I guess that is your goal in this ng.

>Well congratulations! You've achieved your goal.

 

Nobody is more malicious and despicable then you are Frank. You even

lie about your lying. What a putz!

dennis@home wrote:

>

> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

> news:fbltmr$i31$8@aioe.org...

<snipage>

> It makes you appear to be irrational and untrustworthy.

 

Like MS's initiative Untrustworthy Computing?

 

--

Priceless quotes in m.p.w.vista.general group:

http://protectfreedom.tripod.com/kick.html

 

"Fair use is not merely a nice concept--it is a federal law based on

free speech rights under the First Amendment and is a cornerstone of the

creativity and innovation that is a hallmark of this country. Consumer

rights in the digital age are not frivolous."

- Maura Corbett

Alias wrote:

> dennis@home wrote:

>

>>

>> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

>> news:fbltlj$i31$7@aioe.org...

>>

>>> dennis@home wrote:

>>>

>>>>

>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

>>>> news:fbjrdg$316$1@aioe.org...

>>>>

>>>>> Most users think they have a solution because their computer came

>>>>> bundled with McAfee or Norton. Most users do not read these groups

>>>>> or any other technical web sites. Just because they are not

>>>>> spending their time researching how to maintain a computer, doesn't

>>>>> mean they're stupid. It means they have better things to do. With

>>>>> Ubuntu, there is no need to do this research because it's, compared

>>>>> to Windows, practically bullet proof.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> However as you have been told in the past it is *not* bullet proof

>>>> and you have only your own ignorance if you do not research it and

>>>> find out why many people are telling you that you are *wrong*.

>>>

>>>

>>> Reading comprehension problem? I wrote: "practically bullet proof".

>>>

>>>> The last time I looked there were tens of unfixed vulnerabilities in

>>>> Ubuntu, probably more than in Vista.

>>>

>>>

>>> Keep telling yourself that lie.

>>>

>>>> If you haven't been exploited with an attitude like yours it will be

>>>> more luck than skill.

>>>

>>>

>>> Ah, the unfounded insult. Can't you do better than that?

>>>

>>>>

>>>> You had best use Google to find how to check your box for exploits

>>>> and see if you need to fix them.

>>>

>>>

>>> No need to Google as I already know how.

>>

>>

>> You know how but refuse to accept that the problem exists.

>> Is it a surprise to you that noone thinks you know anything about linux?

>>

>>

>>>> In the mean time I suggest that less knowledgeable users than

>>>> yourself would be better off using some of the better security tools

>>>> on windows as they do the work you will have to do manually if you

>>>> want to be certain you have not been compromised.

>>>

>>>

>>> Sure, pull the other one, it has bells on it.

>>

>>

>> More evidence you know nothing about linux and anything you recommend

>> can be ignored quite safely.

>>

>>>> BTW you are running a separate hardware based firewall with logging

>>>> so you can easily check for exploits running on your machines or do

>>>> you plan on doing it the hard way?

>>>

>>>

>>> I can see you don't understand the architecture of Linux. Try Google.

>>

>>

>> I can see you have never written any kernel code in any Unix.

>> I have BTW and I do know quite a bit more than you about Linux and

>> some other better flavors of kernel.

>> You just repeat what some Linux guy has told you and lack the basic

>> skills to know he was lying or at best wrong just like you.

>>

>> As for Google you wouldn't know which bit to ignore even if it flashed

>> in red lights saying this is wrong.. that's the trouble with the WWW

>> its full of cr@p and users like you can't tell the difference between

>> the cr@p and the good stuff and just propagate the cr@p.

>

>

> Sigh, more lies, insults, bragging and bluster. Ho hum.

>

 

You need to stop sighing and ho-huming and face the truth about your

very flawed character that you've built on your constant lying.

It's called the "awful truth" and it must be very painful knowing that

the entire ng knows about your pathological lying, but with real help,

you just might be able to over come your mental maladies which currently

afflict you.

At least you could try...if you're man enough!

Frank

Adam Albright wrote:

> On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 10:58:14 -0700, Frank <fb@nospan.crm> wrote:

>

>

>>Proof for the entire ng that you know you post stupid and malicious

>>postings makes you a really despicable human being!

>>I guess that is your goal in this ng.

>>Well congratulations! You've achieved your goal.

>

>

> Nobody is more malicious and despicable then you are Frank. You even

> lie about your lying. What a putz!

>

OMG, you're stinkin drunk again aren't you?

Sober up, ok?

Frank

On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 12:04:15 -0700, Frank <fb@nospan.crm> wrote:

 

>You need to stop sighing and ho-huming and face the truth about your

>very flawed character that you've built on your constant lying.

>It's called the "awful truth" and it must be very painful knowing that

>the entire ng knows about your pathological lying, but with real help,

>you just might be able to over come your mental maladies which currently

>afflict you.

>At least you could try...if you're man enough!

>Frank

 

Frankie projecting again. Everybody knows the pathological liar is you

Frank.