Jump to content

Guest, which answer was the most helpful?

If any of these replies answered your question, please take a moment to click the 'Mark as solution' button on the post with the best answer.
Marking posts as the solution will help other community members find answers to their questions quickly. Thank you for your help!

Featured Replies

Re: Why Vists is sometimes no more useful than a pile of wet dogcrap

 

On 8/30/2007 11:15 AM On a whim, Alias pounded out on the keyboard

> Frank wrote:

> souther cal, where I live.

>> Frank

>

> La La land. Figures. Orange county?

>

 

No, around by LAX (for a reference point for you).

 

--

Terry R.

 

***Reply Note***

Anti-spam measures are included in my email address.

Delete NOSPAM from the email address after clicking Reply.

  • Replies 181
  • Views 3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Re: Why Vists is sometimes no more useful than a pile of wet dogcrap

 

Adam Albright wrote:

>

> I'll give you this much.

 

A known idiot like you has noting of value to give me.

 

You sure have a vivid imagination, but you

> also have a lousy memory for what you already claimed in the past

> which always trips you up and makes you dig a deeper hole which you

> then try to lie your way out of.

>

 

hehehe...still can't come up with the goods to prove I'm not telling the

truth, huh?

Then that makes you a big mouth liar doesn't it.

Frank

Re: Why Vists is sometimes no more useful than a pile of wet dogcrap

 

Alias wrote:

> Frank wrote:

> souther cal, where I live.

>

>> Frank

>

>

> La La land. Figures. Orange county?

>

Never!

Try again.

Frank

Re: Why Vists is sometimes no more useful than a pile of wet dogcrap

 

Terry R. wrote:

> On 8/30/2007 11:15 AM On a whim, Alias pounded out on the keyboard

>

>> Frank wrote:

>> souther cal, where I live.

>>

>>> Frank

>>

>>

>> La La land. Figures. Orange county?

>>

>

> No, around by LAX (for a reference point for you).

>

 

Sorry, wrong again!

Frank

Re: Why Vists is sometimes no more useful than a pile of wet dogcrap

 

Adam Albright wrote:

>

>

> Frankie is changing his story again. This is about the 6th version.

 

 

No, but this is about the up-teenth verision you, in your drunken

stupor have imagined...lol.

 

 

I

> wonder what tomorrow will bring.

 

Another dreamed up lie from you no doubt? Prove you point loser, we're

all waiting....

 

 

Maybe Frankie will tell us about his

> astronaut days or when he set the world land speed record, or maybe

> when Frankie climbed Mt. Everest on one leg with one eye shut. Maybe

> Frank will say he held the world record for eating hot dogs on Coney

> Island before that skinny Japanese guy did. Who knows, with Frankie

> he'll claim anything, but never is willing to offer proof of any of

> it.

>

Drunk and delusional again are you?

I keep challenging you to produce the proof of your lies but you can't

seem to do it.

Sober up you fat as*hole and face the truth...you're the real phony, the

fake, the fraud, the liar.

we all know it.

Frank

Re: Why Vists is sometimes no more useful than a pile of wet dogcrap

 

Adam Albright wrote:

> On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:07:12 -0700, Frank <fb@nospan.crm> wrote:

>

>

>>Adam Albright wrote:

>>

>>

>>>If anybody wanted to waste the time doing it they could pick apart

>>>your posts one by one and prove what a lying sack of sh*t you truly

>>>are.

>>

>>Do it! Or else STFU ok?

>

>

> More fun just to watch you slowly twisting in the wind as you keep

> lying.

>

 

Still can't come up with the proof of your lies huh?

Get up off the floor you drunken sod! Stop making a fool out of yourself

for pete's sake!

But then again, don't do it for me!

I'm enjoying your delusion diatribes.

Frank

Re: Why Vists is sometimes no more useful than a pile of wet dogcrap

 

Terry R. wrote:

 

>

> That would be "your" stupid responses. All you've boasted about and you

> have trouble with your and you're?

 

So, but typo's do happen! Does that bother you that much.

>

> Your actual wording was "build the hardware". Something you have not

> done. After I asked for a deeper explanation, it came down to repairing

> a single mb and making a mod to a single card. Just because I change

> the oil and tune my car doesn't mean I built it.

 

I guess that really does bother you, doesn't it.

>

> I guess this is where DanS was talking about the S T R E T C H thing.

 

Nice try terry, but no cigar. If you think interpreting "build the

hardware" constitutes some kind of stretching of something then you've

got more problems than I originally thought.

Frank

On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:57:16 -0700, Frank <fb@nospan.crm> wrote:

>Alias wrote:

>

>> Frank wrote:

>> souther cal, where I live.

>>

>>> Frank

>>

>>

>> La La land. Figures. Orange county?

>>

>Never!

>Try again.

>Frank

 

Frankie lives in Watts, across the street from Magic Johnson's

Recreation Center, in Los Angles.

Re: Why Vists is sometimes no more useful than a pile of wet dogcrap

 

On 8/30/2007 4:20 PM On a whim, Frank pounded out on the keyboard

> Terry R. wrote:

>

>

>> That would be "your" stupid responses. All you've boasted about and you

>> have trouble with your and you're?

>

> So, but typo's do happen! Does that bother you that much.

>> Your actual wording was "build the hardware". Something you have not

>> done. After I asked for a deeper explanation, it came down to repairing

>> a single mb and making a mod to a single card. Just because I change

>> the oil and tune my car doesn't mean I built it.

>

> I guess that really does bother you, doesn't it.

 

Bother me, no. Did you make an incorrect statement in regards to your

explanation? Yes.

>> I guess this is where DanS was talking about the S T R E T C H thing.

>

> Nice try terry, but no cigar. If you think interpreting "build the

> hardware" constitutes some kind of stretching of something then you've

> got more problems than I originally thought.

> Frank

 

There isn't any interpreting needed for your comment. Your explanation

didn't match what you said. What problems would I have for bringing

this to your attention Frank?

 

--

Terry R.

 

***Reply Note***

Anti-spam measures are included in my email address.

Delete NOSPAM from the email address after clicking Reply.

Re: Why Vists is sometimes no more useful than a pile of wet dogcrap

 

On 8/30/2007 3:57 PM On a whim, Frank pounded out on the keyboard

> Terry R. wrote:

>

>> On 8/30/2007 11:15 AM On a whim, Alias pounded out on the keyboard

>>

>>> Frank wrote:

>>> souther cal, where I live.

>>>

>>>> Frank

>>>

>>> La La land. Figures. Orange county?

>>>

>> No, around by LAX (for a reference point for you).

>>

>

> Sorry, wrong again!

> Frank

 

Well Road Runner seems to be coming out of Temecula now. I thought at

one point it came from Redondo Beach.

 

--

Terry R.

 

***Reply Note***

Anti-spam measures are included in my email address.

Delete NOSPAM from the email address after clicking Reply.

Re: Why Vists is sometimes no more useful than a pile of wet dogcrap

 

Frank wrote:

> Alias wrote:

>

>> Frank wrote:

>> souther cal, where I live.

>>

>>> Frank

>>

>>

>> La La land. Figures. Orange county?

>>

> Never!

> Try again.

> Frank

 

SO CAL is a big place. Ashamed to say what part?

 

--

Alias

To email me, remove shoes

Re: Why Vists is sometimes no more useful than a pile of wet dogcrap

 

Terry R. wrote:

 

>

> Bother me, no. Did you make an incorrect statement in regards to your

> explanation? Yes.

 

Of course I didn't. You just decided to interpret it that way. That's

your problem not mine.

>

>>> I guess this is where DanS was talking about the S T R E T C H

>>> thing.

>>

>>

>> Nice try terry, but no cigar. If you think interpreting "build the

>> hardware" constitutes some kind of stretching of something then you've

>> got more problems than I originally thought.

>> Frank

>

>

> There isn't any interpreting needed for your comment.

 

Then why did you decide to mis-interpret it, huh?

 

Your explanation

> didn't match what you said.

 

Of course it did.

 

What problems would I have for bringing

> this to your attention Frank?

 

You tell me as you're the one who's apparently so upset with my statements.

Frank

"Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

news:fb63f0$jad$2@aioe.org...

> Vista User wrote:

>>

>> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

>> news:fb2d99$59q$1@aioe.org...

>>> Vista User wrote:

>>>>

>>>> "Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

>>>> news:9na9d3p6nj1c06s0qc655qpnjqcnol2ph7@4ax.com...

>>>>> On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 14:50:10 -0700, Frank <fb@nospan.crm> wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> Adam Albright wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 12:34:03 -0700, "Vista User"

>>>>>>> <VistaRules@NoSpam.net> wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Well it must be the crap hardware your running. I'm sure it not the

>>>>>>>> pompous

>>>>>>>> a$$hole at the keyboard.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> I'm sure Seagate will appreciate your stupid comments. They

>>>>>>> presently

>>>>>>> make some of the best drives and are the only ones that come with a

>>>>>>> five year warranty, others if you're lucky give you just a one year

>>>>>>> warranty.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Really? Then I must have gotten very lucky cause all of our WD

>>>>>> Raptors

>>>>>> come with a 5 yr warranty.

>>>>>

>>>>> As usual you lie about everything. You're comparing apples and

>>>>> oranges. Consumer grade verses enterprise models. And do note the ***

>>>>> footnote.

>>>>>

>>>>> http://support.wdc.com/warranty/policy.asp#policy

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Well your still full of crap Seagate does NOT provide 5 year warranty's

>>>> on all there drives.

>>>> And Western Digital does provide 5 year warranty's for some drives.

>>>> So your statement is as full of crap as you are.

>>>>

>>>> Now dance monkey and tell us how you were talking about something else.

>>>> (your usual way of trying to not admit you were wrong again).

>>>>

>>>

>>> Yeah, but the warranty isn't very helpful if, like me, you had to send

>>> the hard drive to Ireland, pay for the postage and wait a couple weeks

>>> to get a good one back. It wouldn't have been much more expensive to

>>> just buy a new one.

>>>

>>> --

>>> Alias

>>> To email me, remove shoes

>>

>> I have never had to wait more then 3 days.

>> Maybe you should move out of that backward country you live in.

>

> The country in question is Ireland and I don't live there. Please try to

> keep up.

>

> --

> Alias

> To email me, remove shoes

 

Never said you did. Try reading first.

On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 17:34:33 -0700, Frank <fb@nospan.crm> wrote:

>Terry R. wrote:

>

>

>>

>> Bother me, no. Did you make an incorrect statement in regards to your

>> explanation? Yes.

>

>Of course I didn't. You just decided to interpret it that way. That's

>your problem not mine.

 

You're the one that constantly says something then tries to say he

really meant something else. I've dealt with HUNDREDS of clowns over

the years that always do the same thing like you try. All trolls and

that's all you are a troll, sooner or later hang themselves.

 

You try to float some lie. Somebody notices you are obviously lying so

you try to modify what you originally said or pretend you meant

something else or it's the reader not you the poster that made

something up or is confused.

 

You've made hundreds of posts that way. Sooner or later you reach a

tipping point where your creditability is totally shot. You are

actually past that point. Nobody believes anything you say because

you've been caught lying so many times. Give is up Frank. Do yourself

a favor and just shut-up.

On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 19:35:21 -0700, "Vista User"

<VistaRules@NoSpam.net> wrote:

>

>"Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

>> The country in question is Ireland and I don't live there. Please try to

>> keep up.

>>

>> --

>> Alias

>> To email me, remove shoes

>

>Never said you did. Try reading first.

 

Trying growing up. I know, an impossible dream for twits like you.

"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

news:gu0fd39bsh043fde6hrobiashmsm7t4n4g@4ax.com...

> On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 19:35:21 -0700, "Vista User"

> <VistaRules@NoSpam.net> wrote:

>

>>

>>"Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

>

>>> The country in question is Ireland and I don't live there. Please try to

>>> keep up.

>>>

>>> --

>>> Alias

>>> To email me, remove shoes

>>

>>Never said you did. Try reading first.

>

> Trying growing up. I know, an impossible dream for twits like you.

>

 

Still upset that I forced you to say you were wrong.

Let it go, you will feel better and be more of a man for it.

Re: Why Vists is sometimes no more useful than a pile of wet dogcrap

 

On 8/30/2007 5:34 PM On a whim, Frank pounded out on the keyboard

> Terry R. wrote:

>

>

>> Bother me, no. Did you make an incorrect statement in regards to your

>> explanation? Yes.

>

> Of course I didn't. You just decided to interpret it that way. That's

> your problem not mine.

 

Sorry Frank. You tell me where "I build hardware" is the same as

repairing a capacitor or modifying an add on card. There is no

interpretation problem. You did not "build" anything which means to

create from nothing.

 

>>>> I guess this is where DanS was talking about the S T R E T C H

>>>> thing.

>>>

>>> Nice try terry, but no cigar. If you think interpreting "build the

>>> hardware" constitutes some kind of stretching of something then you've

>>> got more problems than I originally thought.

>>> Frank

>>

>> There isn't any interpreting needed for your comment.

>

> Then why did you decide to mis-interpret it, huh?

 

This is your typical round and round. I didn't misinterpret anything.

You said you build hardware and your explanation did not verify your

prior statement.

>

> Your explanation

>> didn't match what you said.

>

> Of course it did.

 

Another of your round and round. It most certainly did NOT. How can

you claim to "build hardware" and then say you replaced a capacitor?

Do you really think those are one and the same? Funny, because no one

else does.

>

> What problems would I have for bringing

>> this to your attention Frank?

>

> You tell me as you're the one who's apparently so upset with my statements.

> Frank

>

 

Again, not upset. Just wanting your statements to match. Something

that hasn't happened yet.

 

--

Terry R.

 

***Reply Note***

Anti-spam measures are included in my email address.

Delete NOSPAM from the email address after clicking Reply.

On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 20:18:11 -0700, "Terry R." <F1ComNOSPAM@pobox.com>

wrote:

 

>Another of your round and round. It most certainly did NOT. How can

>you claim to "build hardware" and then say you replaced a capacitor?

>Do you really think those are one and the same? Funny, because no one

>else does.

 

Frank always speaks in pig Latin. If we say wow that's a hot looking

woman we mean something like this:

 

http://googlegirls.files.wordpress.com/2006/01/873286260.jpg

 

When Frank says he's dating a hot woman he means something more like

this:

 

http://www.wayodd.com/funny-pictures2/funny-pictures-beautiful-old-lady-13b.jpg

On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 20:09:04 -0700, "Vista User"

<VistaRules@NoSpam.net> wrote:

>

>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message

>news:gu0fd39bsh043fde6hrobiashmsm7t4n4g@4ax.com...

>> On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 19:35:21 -0700, "Vista User"

>> <VistaRules@NoSpam.net> wrote:

>>

>>>

>>>"Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message

>>

>>>> The country in question is Ireland and I don't live there. Please try to

>>>> keep up.

>>>>

>>>> --

>>>> Alias

>>>> To email me, remove shoes

>>>

>>>Never said you did. Try reading first.

>>

>> Trying growing up. I know, an impossible dream for twits like you.

>>

>

>Still upset that I forced you to say you were wrong.

>Let it go, you will feel better and be more of a man for it.

 

Forced me? How do you force anybody to post anything in a newsgroup?

 

I admit my mistakes. You should try it sometime fool.

Re: Why Vists is sometimes no more useful than a pile of wet dogcrap

 

Adam Albright wrote:

> You're the one that constantly says something then tries to say he

> really meant something else.

 

Point our where I did that right now, because I'm calling you a fukkin

liar. You are a liar, got it?

Liar.

 

I've dealt with HUNDREDS of clowns over

> the years that always do the same thing like you try. All trolls and

> that's all you are a troll, sooner or later hang themselves.

 

Again, if you have a case, and we all know you don't, show me and the

rest of this ng and save yourself from forever being labeled as a liar.

Do it!

>

> You try to float some lie. Somebody notices you are obviously lying so

> you try to modify what you originally said or pretend you meant

> something else or it's the reader not you the poster that made

> something up or is confused.

 

Right now, point out where I've done any of what you've just said. Go

ahead and do it if you think you're right.

Save yourself if you have any pride or character at all.

>

> You've made hundreds of posts that way. Sooner or later you reach a

> tipping point where your creditability is totally shot. You are

> actually past that point.

 

Prove it right now, if you can.

 

Nobody believes anything you say because

> you've been caught lying so many times.

 

You're the only one doing that adam...where is everyone else claim, huh?

 

Give is up Frank. Do yourself

> a favor and just shut-up.

 

 

No, no, no...doesn't work that way georgie-boy. You've made a big deal

and a false and libelous claim...now prove it or else accept the fact

that you are actually the lying scumbag as*hole big mouth PUTZ that you

come across as being.

So...where is your proof?

Frank

Re: Why Vists is sometimes no more useful than a pile of wet dogcrap

 

Terry R. wrote:

>

>

> Sorry Frank. You tell me where "I build hardware" is the same as

> repairing a capacitor or modifying an add on card.

 

Hummm...never said building hardware is the same thing as repairing

capacitors on a mobo or moding a card.

I said "Obviously, I build all of our computers including the hardware,

install all of the software and maintain our LAN/Network & server".

 

There is no

> interpretation problem.

 

Obviously, you have a big problem with interpretation. Maybe, and just

for you I should have included an comma after the word computers, which

would have made my meaning a little more clear to eggheads like you. But

you've have to brain dead not to get my actual meaning. I build all of

our computers, including etc, etc, etc,.

 

You did not "build" anything which means to

> create from nothing.

 

Oh? Build means to create from nothing?

Not in any dictornaty I've ever seen.

Create means to make something from nothing.

Only God can do that.

Frank

Re: Why Vists is sometimes no more useful than a pile of wet dogcrap

 

Adam Albright wrote:

 

>

> I admit my mistakes. You should try it sometime fool.

>

Damn, I almost hurt myself falling on the floor laughing at that statement!

Even when you've been proved wrong you can't admit it.

You're nothing but a drunken lying as*hole.

Frank

On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 22:19:50 -0700, Frank <fb@nospan.crm> wrote:

>Adam Albright wrote:

>

>> You're the one that constantly says something then tries to say he

>> really meant something else.

>

>Point our where I did that right now, because I'm calling you a fukkin

>liar. You are a liar, got it?

>Liar.

 

Damn Frankie... watching you twist in the wind getting caught in your

constant lies is sure FUN to watch!

 

I bet you feel like a certain senator from Utah caught in a public

bathroom getting a bit too friendly with the guy in the next stall and

then desperately trying to pretend, oh no, not me, you just don't

understand.

 

ROTFLMAO!

On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 22:32:23 -0700, Frank <fb@nospan.crm> wrote:

>Terry R. wrote:

>

>>

>>

>> Sorry Frank. You tell me where "I build hardware" is the same as

>> repairing a capacitor or modifying an add on card.

>

>Hummm...never said building hardware is the same thing as repairing

>capacitors on a mobo or moding a card.

>I said "Obviously, I build all of our computers including the hardware,

>install all of the software and maintain our LAN/Network & server".

>

> There is no

>> interpretation problem.

>

>Obviously, you have a big problem with interpretation. Maybe, and just

>for you I should have included an comma after the word computers, which

>would have made my meaning a little more clear to eggheads like you. But

>you've have to brain dead not to get my actual meaning. I build all of

>our computers, including etc, etc, etc,.

>

> You did not "build" anything which means to

>> create from nothing.

>

>Oh? Build means to create from nothing?

>Not in any dictornaty I've ever seen.

>Create means to make something from nothing.

>Only God can do that.

>Frank

>

 

Let us know when that hole you're digging for yourself gets to China.

 

You must have an odd dictionary. Mine says "building" means to cause

to be constructed. While repair, what you did by replacing a single

capacitor means to return to a prior state, ie, to fix. You'll need

way more than adding a comma to undo your constant lying.

On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 22:35:09 -0700, Frank <fb@nospan.crm> wrote:

>Adam Albright wrote:

>

>

>>

>> I admit my mistakes. You should try it sometime fool.

>>

>Damn, I almost hurt myself falling on the floor laughing at that statement!

>Even when you've been proved wrong you can't admit it.

>You're nothing but a drunken lying as*hole.

>Frank

 

No idiot like you ever proved me wrong at anything and we both know

it. So again, Frankie is lying his stupid sh*t encrusted ass off in

some desperate effort to try to save face. Won't work. You known as a

liar.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...