Jump to content

Guest, which answer was the most helpful?

If any of these replies answered your question, please take a moment to click the 'Mark as solution' button on the post with the best answer.
Marking posts as the solution will help other community members find answers to their questions quickly. Thank you for your help!

Featured Replies

On 8/4/2010 4:11 PM, Boscoe wrote:

 

> On 04/08/2010 10:42 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>> On 08/04/2010 01:28 AM, Boscoe wrote:

 

>>> IE8 final code was released on 19 March 2009 and overtook IE6 in

 

>>> February 2010 to become the most popular browser in the world.

 

>>

 

>> Real good reason not to use it as it is also the most attacked browser

 

>> in the world. Combine that with the malware vulnerable Windows and

 

>> you've got a great combo for a compromised computer.

 

>>

 

>

 

> They're hardly going to target an O/S that has less than i% of the

 

> market. Seen any malware written for Win 98 or 2000, lately?

 

> LOL

 

 

 

Oh dear, another one who doesn't understand the difference between Linux

 

architecture and Windows architecture. Course, you don't seem to know

 

the difference between "1" and "i" either so it's not surprising.

 

 

 

--

 

Alias

  • Replies 216
  • Views 6.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

On 8/4/2010 4:11 PM, Boscoe wrote:

 

> On 04/08/2010 10:42 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>> On 08/04/2010 01:28 AM, Boscoe wrote:

 

>>> IE8 final code was released on 19 March 2009 and overtook IE6 in

 

>>> February 2010 to become the most popular browser in the world.

 

>>

 

>> Real good reason not to use it as it is also the most attacked browser

 

>> in the world. Combine that with the malware vulnerable Windows and

 

>> you've got a great combo for a compromised computer.

 

>>

 

>

 

> They're hardly going to target an O/S that has less than i% of the

 

> market. Seen any malware written for Win 98 or 2000, lately?

 

> LOL

 

 

 

You snipped this:

 

 

> Windows is not perfect but it's easy to use and

 

> has made the computer so accessible to so many.

 

 

 

Not so easy to use when it keeps giving you a BSOD or is compromised by

 

malware.

 

 

 

Well?

 

 

 

--

 

Alias

On 8/4/2010 2:46 AM, Alias wrote:

 

> On 08/04/2010 01:28 AM, Frank wrote:

 

>> On 8/3/2010 4:00 PM, Alias wrote:

 

>>> On 08/03/2010 10:13 PM, Pulled Pork wrote:

 

>>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>>> news:i39smj$qdq$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>>> On 08/03/2010 09:55 PM, Boscoe wrote:

 

>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 8:36 PM, DanS wrote:

 

>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

 

>>>>>>> news:vBZ5o.4300$Pi3.3229@hurricane:

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 6:25 PM, DanS wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

 

>>>>>>>>> news:1wV5o.18728$MQ3.2273@hurricane:

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 9:12 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 03:03 AM, DanS wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> news:IxF5o.12302$7Z3.3276@hurricane:

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> sh are .aspx?qprid=8>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ha Ha Ha

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Interestingly IE8 only took 10 months to become the

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>> global browser leader.

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> It it pushed through automatic updates ?

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>> Of course.

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> You and your fellow Linux trolls never make much sense,

 

>>>>>>>>>> do you?

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> So explain the continued rise of Internet Explorer, which

 

>>>>>>>>>> is a reversal in the browser?s fortunes, which has

 

>>>>>>>>>> continually lost share to the likes of Firefox over the

 

>>>>>>>>>> last few years. So, much for the automatic updates?

 

>>>>>>>>>> Idiots!!

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> Why so much for automatic updates ?

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> Let's see.....IE *COMES* on the PC most buy that already

 

>>>>>>>>> *COMES* with Windows installed.......

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> Most PCs come with automatic updates enabled, and set to

 

>>>>>>>>> automatically install any updates it finds....

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> Why is it so hard to accept this as a valid justification

 

>>>>>>>>> as to why IE8 was adopted quickly.

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> (Other than it goes against what you are trying to

 

>>>>>>>>> say....whatever that is.)

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> Well as you seem to be bit slow let me explain. Over the

 

>>>>>>>> last two years - with me so far? - IE has lost some of its

 

>>>>>>>> market share to Firefox. You know people switching to

 

>>>>>>>> Firefox... er... from IE Geddit?

 

>>>>>>>> Hard to imagine updating IE with Firefox, but there you

 

>>>>>>>> go, or in

 

>>>>>>>> your case there you don't. Now IE8 has once again

 

>>>>>>>> established itself as the ultimate browser by gaining back

 

>>>>>>>> more than it lost.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> So what you are saying is that in the previous 2 years, where

 

>>>>>>> the MS IE browser went from roughly 75% share to a low of

 

>>>>>>> 59.75%.......

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> ....and in the past two months, it has 'skyrocketed' back to

 

>>>>>>> 60.74%.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> (These are the numbers listed form the site *you* linked.)

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> http://www.netmarketshare.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=

 

>>>>>>> 1&qptimeframe=M&qpsp=115&qpnp=25

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> This is gaining back *more* than it lost ?

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> And you call *me* slow ?

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> You shouldn't have an attitude as you do when you don't even

 

>>>>>>> understand what the hell you are trying to say.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> In-other-words, now people are

 

>>>>>>>> switching back from Firefox to IE8 in greater numbers than

 

>>>>>>>> ever before.

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> Now, that wasn't hard was it?

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> To make you look like just another fool that doesn't even know

 

>>>>>>> he's trying to say ?

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Nope.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Yep...I just go by the facts...And IE8 is the global leader... "itis

 

>>>>>> the second month in a row of global gains for

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Internet Explorer and the third straight month of increasing sharein

 

>>>>>> the US.

 

>>>>>> The world?s most popular browser accounted for a 60.7 per cent

 

>>>>>> share of

 

>>>>>> the global browser market during July, up on the previous month by

 

>>>>>> 0.4

 

>>>>>> per cent."

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> "Firefox?s market share peaked in April 2010, with 24.59 per cent and

 

>>>>>> has been declining ever since."

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Anyway, better a fool than a Linux troll in a Windows froupe.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Taking sides are we? Why? Why not have both? MS for those Windows

 

>>>>> programs that work better in Windows and Linux for everything else but

 

>>>>> more securely. Computers aren't expensive these days and hard drives

 

>>>>> even cheaper. Hell, you could run Linux from a pen drive.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> --

 

>>>>> Alias

 

>>>>

 

>>>> So MS for those Windows programs that work better in Windows. - Hey

 

>>>> fuckwit - That would be all of them!

 

>>>

 

>>> Wrong.

 

>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> For everything else you don't need a computer and that makes Linux

 

>>>> worth

 

>>>> exactly what you pay for it: NOTHING.

 

>>>

 

>>> Wrong.

 

>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Better boot up your Linux pen and watch the spinning cube! LOL!

 

>>>

 

>>> You're an idiot.

 

>>>

 

>> Projecting again...idiot?

 

>>

 

>

 

> That's all you've got?

 

>

 

That is more than you can handle!

 

Oops!

On 8/4/2010 2:36 AM, Alias wrote:

 

> On 08/04/2010 03:41 AM, Frank wrote:

 

>> On 8/3/2010 5:57 PM, DanS wrote:

 

>>>>> Taking sides are we? Why? Why not have both? MS for those

 

>>>>> Windows programs that work better in Windows and Linux for

 

>>>>> everything else but more securely.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> *BULLSHIT*!!!

 

>>>> All anyone need for their computer use is Windows

 

>>>> 7...PERIOD!!! Live with it.

 

>>>

 

>>> You can't run Pro-E Wildfire 3 for Linux under Windows.

 

>>

 

>> Nor can you make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.

 

>

 

> You just got punked and all you can do is quote the fairy tale Bible?

 

>

 

You didn't even have to duck in order to miss that one!...LOL!

 

Oops!

On 8/4/2010 7:26 AM, Alias wrote:

 

> On 8/4/2010 4:06 PM, Boscoe wrote:

 

>> On 04/08/2010 10:40 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>

 

>>> And your source for being able to read the minds of all of today's Linux

 

>>> users is?

 

>>>

 

>>

 

>>

 

>> They like to be seen as geeky and different. Not you because you use

 

>> kids Linux...

 

>

 

> Have you always had a problem with thinking in this stereotypical

 

> fashion? You do know what a stereotype is, or do you?

 

>

 

Projecting again, huh? You do know what projecting is, or do you?

On 08/04/2010 04:40 PM, Frank wrote:

 

> On 8/4/2010 2:46 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>> On 08/04/2010 01:28 AM, Frank wrote:

 

>>> On 8/3/2010 4:00 PM, Alias wrote:

 

>>>> On 08/03/2010 10:13 PM, Pulled Pork wrote:

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>>>> news:i39smj$qdq$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 09:55 PM, Boscoe wrote:

 

>>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 8:36 PM, DanS wrote:

 

>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

 

>>>>>>>> news:vBZ5o.4300$Pi3.3229@hurricane:

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 6:25 PM, DanS wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

 

>>>>>>>>>> news:1wV5o.18728$MQ3.2273@hurricane:

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 9:12 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 03:03 AM, DanS wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:IxF5o.12302$7Z3.3276@hurricane:

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> sh are .aspx?qprid=8>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ha Ha Ha

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Interestingly IE8 only took 10 months to become the

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> global browser leader.

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>> It it pushed through automatic updates ?

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course.

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>> You and your fellow Linux trolls never make much sense,

 

>>>>>>>>>>> do you?

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>> So explain the continued rise of Internet Explorer, which

 

>>>>>>>>>>> is a reversal in the browser?s fortunes, which has

 

>>>>>>>>>>> continually lost share to the likes of Firefox over the

 

>>>>>>>>>>> last few years. So, much for the automatic updates?

 

>>>>>>>>>>> Idiots!!

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> Why so much for automatic updates ?

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> Let's see.....IE *COMES* on the PC most buy that already

 

>>>>>>>>>> *COMES* with Windows installed.......

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> Most PCs come with automatic updates enabled, and set to

 

>>>>>>>>>> automatically install any updates it finds....

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> Why is it so hard to accept this as a valid justification

 

>>>>>>>>>> as to why IE8 was adopted quickly.

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> (Other than it goes against what you are trying to

 

>>>>>>>>>> say....whatever that is.)

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> Well as you seem to be bit slow let me explain. Over the

 

>>>>>>>>> last two years - with me so far? - IE has lost some of its

 

>>>>>>>>> market share to Firefox. You know people switching to

 

>>>>>>>>> Firefox... er... from IE Geddit?

 

>>>>>>>>> Hard to imagine updating IE with Firefox, but there you

 

>>>>>>>>> go, or in

 

>>>>>>>>> your case there you don't. Now IE8 has once again

 

>>>>>>>>> established itself as the ultimate browser by gaining back

 

>>>>>>>>> more than it lost.

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> So what you are saying is that in the previous 2 years, where

 

>>>>>>>> the MS IE browser went from roughly 75% share to a low of

 

>>>>>>>> 59.75%.......

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> ....and in the past two months, it has 'skyrocketed' back to

 

>>>>>>>> 60.74%.

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> (These are the numbers listed form the site *you* linked.)

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> http://www.netmarketshare.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=

 

>>>>>>>> 1&qptimeframe=M&qpsp=115&qpnp=25

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> This is gaining back *more* than it lost ?

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> And you call *me* slow ?

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> You shouldn't have an attitude as you do when you don't even

 

>>>>>>>> understand what the hell you are trying to say.

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> In-other-words, now people are

 

>>>>>>>>> switching back from Firefox to IE8 in greater numbers than

 

>>>>>>>>> ever before.

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> Now, that wasn't hard was it?

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> To make you look like just another fool that doesn't even know

 

>>>>>>>> he's trying to say ?

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> Nope.

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Yep...I just go by the facts...And IE8 is the global leader...

 

>>>>>>> "it is

 

>>>>>>> the second month in a row of global gains for

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Internet Explorer and the third straight month of increasing

 

>>>>>>> share in

 

>>>>>>> the US.

 

>>>>>>> The world?s most popular browser accounted for a 60.7 per cent

 

>>>>>>> share of

 

>>>>>>> the global browser market during July, up on the previous month by

 

>>>>>>> 0.4

 

>>>>>>> per cent."

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> "Firefox?s market share peaked in April 2010, with 24.59 per cent

 

>>>>>>> and

 

>>>>>>> has been declining ever since."

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Anyway, better a fool than a Linux troll in a Windows froupe.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Taking sides are we? Why? Why not have both? MS for those Windows

 

>>>>>> programs that work better in Windows and Linux for everything else

 

>>>>>> but

 

>>>>>> more securely. Computers aren't expensive these days and hard drives

 

>>>>>> even cheaper. Hell, you could run Linux from a pen drive.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> --

 

>>>>>> Alias

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> So MS for those Windows programs that work better in Windows. - Hey

 

>>>>> fuckwit - That would be all of them!

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Wrong.

 

>>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> For everything else you don't need a computer and that makes Linux

 

>>>>> worth

 

>>>>> exactly what you pay for it: NOTHING.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Wrong.

 

>>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Better boot up your Linux pen and watch the spinning cube! LOL!

 

>>>>

 

>>>> You're an idiot.

 

>>>>

 

>>> Projecting again...idiot?

 

>>>

 

>>

 

>> That's all you've got?

 

>>

 

> That is more than you can handle!

 

> Oops!

 

>

 

 

 

You don't have much and *nothing* you post upsets me in any way, as much

 

as you'd like to think it does. I just consider the source and I know

 

you're a low life liar who is desperate to find something to put me down

 

with but, so far, all you have are LIES.

 

 

 

--

 

Alias

On 08/04/2010 04:41 PM, Frank wrote:

 

> On 8/4/2010 2:36 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>> On 08/04/2010 03:41 AM, Frank wrote:

 

>>> On 8/3/2010 5:57 PM, DanS wrote:

 

>>>>>> Taking sides are we? Why? Why not have both? MS for those

 

>>>>>> Windows programs that work better in Windows and Linux for

 

>>>>>> everything else but more securely.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> *BULLSHIT*!!!

 

>>>>> All anyone need for their computer use is Windows

 

>>>>> 7...PERIOD!!! Live with it.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> You can't run Pro-E Wildfire 3 for Linux under Windows.

 

>>>

 

>>> Nor can you make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.

 

>>

 

>> You just got punked and all you can do is quote the fairy tale Bible?

 

>>

 

> You didn't even have to duck in order to miss that one!...LOL!

 

> Oops!

 

 

 

Oh, I got it. It wasn't as clever as you think. Try running Compiz under

 

Windows.

 

 

 

--

 

Alias

On 08/04/2010 04:42 PM, Frank wrote:

 

> On 8/4/2010 7:26 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>> On 8/4/2010 4:06 PM, Boscoe wrote:

 

>>> On 04/08/2010 10:40 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>>

 

>>>> And your source for being able to read the minds of all of today's

 

>>>> Linux

 

>>>> users is?

 

>>>>

 

>>>

 

>>>

 

>>> They like to be seen as geeky and different. Not you because you use

 

>>> kids Linux...

 

>>

 

>> Have you always had a problem with thinking in this stereotypical

 

>> fashion? You do know what a stereotype is, or do you?

 

>>

 

> Projecting again, huh? You do know what projecting is, or do you?

 

 

 

As predictable as the tide. Yeah, I know what it is. You plagiarized the

 

phrase from me a couple of years ago and have been using it multiple

 

times every fucking day since.

 

 

 

--

 

Alias

On 8/4/2010 7:44 AM, Alias wrote:

 

> On 08/04/2010 04:40 PM, Frank wrote:

 

>> On 8/4/2010 2:46 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>> On 08/04/2010 01:28 AM, Frank wrote:

 

>>>> On 8/3/2010 4:00 PM, Alias wrote:

 

>>>>> On 08/03/2010 10:13 PM, Pulled Pork wrote:

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>>>>> news:i39smj$qdq$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 09:55 PM, Boscoe wrote:

 

>>>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 8:36 PM, DanS wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

 

>>>>>>>>> news:vBZ5o.4300$Pi3.3229@hurricane:

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 6:25 PM, DanS wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

 

>>>>>>>>>>> news:1wV5o.18728$MQ3.2273@hurricane:

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 9:12 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 03:03 AM, DanS wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:IxF5o.12302$7Z3.3276@hurricane:

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sh are .aspx?qprid=8>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ha Ha Ha

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Interestingly IE8 only took 10 months to become the

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> global browser leader.

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It it pushed through automatic updates ?

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course.

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> You and your fellow Linux trolls never make much sense,

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> do you?

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> So explain the continued rise of Internet Explorer, which

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> is a reversal in the browser?s fortunes, which has

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> continually lost share to the likes of Firefox over the

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> last few years. So, much for the automatic updates?

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> Idiots!!

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>> Why so much for automatic updates ?

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>> Let's see.....IE *COMES* on the PC most buy that already

 

>>>>>>>>>>> *COMES* with Windows installed.......

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>> Most PCs come with automatic updates enabled, and set to

 

>>>>>>>>>>> automatically install any updates it finds....

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>> Why is it so hard to accept this as a valid justification

 

>>>>>>>>>>> as to why IE8 was adopted quickly.

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>> (Other than it goes against what you are trying to

 

>>>>>>>>>>> say....whatever that is.)

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> Well as you seem to be bit slow let me explain. Over the

 

>>>>>>>>>> last two years - with me so far? - IE has lost some of its

 

>>>>>>>>>> market share to Firefox. You know people switching to

 

>>>>>>>>>> Firefox... er... from IE Geddit?

 

>>>>>>>>>> Hard to imagine updating IE with Firefox, but there you

 

>>>>>>>>>> go, or in

 

>>>>>>>>>> your case there you don't. Now IE8 has once again

 

>>>>>>>>>> established itself as the ultimate browser by gaining back

 

>>>>>>>>>> more than it lost.

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> So what you are saying is that in the previous 2 years, where

 

>>>>>>>>> the MS IE browser went from roughly 75% share to a low of

 

>>>>>>>>> 59.75%.......

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> ....and in the past two months, it has 'skyrocketed' back to

 

>>>>>>>>> 60.74%.

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> (These are the numbers listed form the site *you* linked.)

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> http://www.netmarketshare.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=

 

>>>>>>>>> 1&qptimeframe=M&qpsp=115&qpnp=25

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> This is gaining back *more* than it lost ?

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> And you call *me* slow ?

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> You shouldn't have an attitude as you do when you don't even

 

>>>>>>>>> understand what the hell you are trying to say.

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> In-other-words, now people are

 

>>>>>>>>>> switching back from Firefox to IE8 in greater numbers than

 

>>>>>>>>>> ever before.

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> Now, that wasn't hard was it?

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> To make you look like just another fool that doesn't even know

 

>>>>>>>>> he's trying to say ?

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> Nope.

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> Yep...I just go by the facts...And IE8 is the global leader...

 

>>>>>>>> "it is

 

>>>>>>>> the second month in a row of global gains for

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> Internet Explorer and the third straight month of increasing

 

>>>>>>>> share in

 

>>>>>>>> the US.

 

>>>>>>>> The world?s most popular browser accounted for a 60.7 per cent

 

>>>>>>>> share of

 

>>>>>>>> the global browser market during July, up on the previous month by

 

>>>>>>>> 0.4

 

>>>>>>>> per cent."

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> "Firefox?s market share peaked in April 2010, with 24.59 per cent

 

>>>>>>>> and

 

>>>>>>>> has been declining ever since."

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> Anyway, better a fool than a Linux troll in a Windows froupe.

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Taking sides are we? Why? Why not have both? MS for those Windows

 

>>>>>>> programs that work better in Windows and Linux for everything else

 

>>>>>>> but

 

>>>>>>> more securely. Computers aren't expensive these days and hard drives

 

>>>>>>> even cheaper. Hell, you could run Linux from a pen drive.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> --

 

>>>>>>> Alias

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> So MS for those Windows programs that work better in Windows. - Hey

 

>>>>>> fuckwit - That would be all of them!

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Wrong.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> For everything else you don't need a computer and that makes Linux

 

>>>>>> worth

 

>>>>>> exactly what you pay for it: NOTHING.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Wrong.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Better boot up your Linux pen and watch the spinning cube! LOL!

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> You're an idiot.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>> Projecting again...idiot?

 

>>>>

 

>>>

 

>>> That's all you've got?

 

>>>

 

>> That is more than you can handle!

 

>> Oops!

 

>>

 

>

 

> You don't have much and *nothing* you post upsets me in any way, as much

 

> as you'd like to think it does.

 

 

 

HEHEHE...KEEP LYING...TO YOURSELF...HAHAHA!

 

 

 

I just consider the source and I know

 

> you're a low life liar who is desperate to find something to put me down

 

> with but, so far, all you have are LIES.

 

 

 

I push all of your hate/anger buttons at will...my will. I say jump and

 

you say "how high"!

 

Oops!...LOL!

On 8/4/2010 7:45 AM, Alias wrote:

 

> On 08/04/2010 04:41 PM, Frank wrote:

 

>> On 8/4/2010 2:36 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>> On 08/04/2010 03:41 AM, Frank wrote:

 

>>>> On 8/3/2010 5:57 PM, DanS wrote:

 

>>>>>>> Taking sides are we? Why? Why not have both? MS for those

 

>>>>>>> Windows programs that work better in Windows and Linux for

 

>>>>>>> everything else but more securely.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> *BULLSHIT*!!!

 

>>>>>> All anyone need for their computer use is Windows

 

>>>>>> 7...PERIOD!!! Live with it.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> You can't run Pro-E Wildfire 3 for Linux under Windows.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Nor can you make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.

 

>>>

 

>>> You just got punked and all you can do is quote the fairy tale Bible?

 

>>>

 

>> You didn't even have to duck in order to miss that one!...LOL!

 

>> Oops!

 

>

 

> Oh, I got it.

 

 

 

No, it's obvious you didn't.

 

 

 

It wasn't as clever as you think.

 

 

 

It was clever enough to stump an ignorant, unintelligent, uneducated

 

bozo like you.

 

 

 

Try running Compiz under

 

> Windows.

 

 

 

Only and a desperate loser like you would make a stupid statement like that.

 

Oops!

On 8/4/2010 7:50 AM, Alias wrote:

 

> On 08/04/2010 04:42 PM, Frank wrote:

 

>> On 8/4/2010 7:26 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>> On 8/4/2010 4:06 PM, Boscoe wrote:

 

>>>> On 04/08/2010 10:40 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>>>

 

>>>>> And your source for being able to read the minds of all of today's

 

>>>>> Linux

 

>>>>> users is?

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> They like to be seen as geeky and different. Not you because you use

 

>>>> kids Linux...

 

>>>

 

>>> Have you always had a problem with thinking in this stereotypical

 

>>> fashion? You do know what a stereotype is, or do you?

 

>>>

 

>> Projecting again, huh? You do know what projecting is, or do you?

 

>

 

> As predictable as the tide.

 

 

 

Yes, you are.

 

 

 

Yeah, I know what it is.

 

 

 

I'm not to sure you really do.

 

 

 

You plagiarized the

 

> phrase from me a couple of years ago and have been using it multiple

 

> times every fucking day since.

 

 

 

Oh, so you're the first person to ever say that huh?...hahaha!

 

Sure you are!

 

Oh and you're misusing the term "plagiarized".

 

Oops!

On 04/08/2010 3:42 PM, Frank wrote:

 

> On 8/4/2010 7:26 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>> On 8/4/2010 4:06 PM, Boscoe wrote:

 

>>> On 04/08/2010 10:40 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>>

 

>>>> And your source for being able to read the minds of all of today's

 

>>>> Linux

 

>>>> users is?

 

>>>>

 

>>>

 

>>>

 

>>> They like to be seen as geeky and different. Not you because you use

 

>>> kids Linux...

 

>>

 

>> Have you always had a problem with thinking in this stereotypical

 

>> fashion? You do know what a stereotype is, or do you?

 

>>

 

> Projecting again, huh? You do know what projecting is, or do you?

 

 

 

 

 

He's stereotypical of the Linux troll. They despise Windows and use

 

jargon which is deliberately contrived simply to make it appear

 

different to Windows. 'Tux?, has spawned an entire sub-culture, a very

 

small clique with visions of grandeur.

On 08/04/2010 04:54 PM, Frank wrote:

 

> On 8/4/2010 7:44 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>> On 08/04/2010 04:40 PM, Frank wrote:

 

>>> On 8/4/2010 2:46 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>>> On 08/04/2010 01:28 AM, Frank wrote:

 

>>>>> On 8/3/2010 4:00 PM, Alias wrote:

 

>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 10:13 PM, Pulled Pork wrote:

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>>>>>> news:i39smj$qdq$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 09:55 PM, Boscoe wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 8:36 PM, DanS wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

 

>>>>>>>>>> news:vBZ5o.4300$Pi3.3229@hurricane:

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 6:25 PM, DanS wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> news:1wV5o.18728$MQ3.2273@hurricane:

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 9:12 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 03:03 AM, DanS wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:IxF5o.12302$7Z3.3276@hurricane:

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sh are .aspx?qprid=8>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ha Ha Ha

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Interestingly IE8 only took 10 months to become the

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> global browser leader.

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It it pushed through automatic updates ?

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course.

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>> You and your fellow Linux trolls never make much sense,

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>> do you?

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>> So explain the continued rise of Internet Explorer, which

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a reversal in the browser?s fortunes, which has

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>> continually lost share to the likes of Firefox over the

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>> last few years. So, much for the automatic updates?

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Idiots!!

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> Why so much for automatic updates ?

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's see.....IE *COMES* on the PC most buy that already

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> *COMES* with Windows installed.......

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> Most PCs come with automatic updates enabled, and set to

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> automatically install any updates it finds....

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> Why is it so hard to accept this as a valid justification

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> as to why IE8 was adopted quickly.

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> (Other than it goes against what you are trying to

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> say....whatever that is.)

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>> Well as you seem to be bit slow let me explain. Over the

 

>>>>>>>>>>> last two years - with me so far? - IE has lost some of its

 

>>>>>>>>>>> market share to Firefox. You know people switching to

 

>>>>>>>>>>> Firefox... er... from IE Geddit?

 

>>>>>>>>>>> Hard to imagine updating IE with Firefox, but there you

 

>>>>>>>>>>> go, or in

 

>>>>>>>>>>> your case there you don't. Now IE8 has once again

 

>>>>>>>>>>> established itself as the ultimate browser by gaining back

 

>>>>>>>>>>> more than it lost.

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> So what you are saying is that in the previous 2 years, where

 

>>>>>>>>>> the MS IE browser went from roughly 75% share to a low of

 

>>>>>>>>>> 59.75%.......

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> ....and in the past two months, it has 'skyrocketed' back to

 

>>>>>>>>>> 60.74%.

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> (These are the numbers listed form the site *you* linked.)

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> http://www.netmarketshare.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=

 

>>>>>>>>>> 1&qptimeframe=M&qpsp=115&qpnp=25

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> This is gaining back *more* than it lost ?

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> And you call *me* slow ?

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> You shouldn't have an attitude as you do when you don't even

 

>>>>>>>>>> understand what the hell you are trying to say.

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>> In-other-words, now people are

 

>>>>>>>>>>> switching back from Firefox to IE8 in greater numbers than

 

>>>>>>>>>>> ever before.

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>> Now, that wasn't hard was it?

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> To make you look like just another fool that doesn't even know

 

>>>>>>>>>> he's trying to say ?

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> Nope.

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> Yep...I just go by the facts...And IE8 is the global leader...

 

>>>>>>>>> "it is

 

>>>>>>>>> the second month in a row of global gains for

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> Internet Explorer and the third straight month of increasing

 

>>>>>>>>> share in

 

>>>>>>>>> the US.

 

>>>>>>>>> The world?s most popular browser accounted for a 60.7 per cent

 

>>>>>>>>> share of

 

>>>>>>>>> the global browser market during July, up on the previous month by

 

>>>>>>>>> 0.4

 

>>>>>>>>> per cent."

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> "Firefox?s market share peaked in April 2010, with 24.59 per cent

 

>>>>>>>>> and

 

>>>>>>>>> has been declining ever since."

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> Anyway, better a fool than a Linux troll in a Windows froupe.

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> Taking sides are we? Why? Why not have both? MS for those Windows

 

>>>>>>>> programs that work better in Windows and Linux for everything else

 

>>>>>>>> but

 

>>>>>>>> more securely. Computers aren't expensive these days and hard

 

>>>>>>>> drives

 

>>>>>>>> even cheaper. Hell, you could run Linux from a pen drive.

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> --

 

>>>>>>>> Alias

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> So MS for those Windows programs that work better in Windows. - Hey

 

>>>>>>> fuckwit - That would be all of them!

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Wrong.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> For everything else you don't need a computer and that makes Linux

 

>>>>>>> worth

 

>>>>>>> exactly what you pay for it: NOTHING.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Wrong.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Better boot up your Linux pen and watch the spinning cube! LOL!

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> You're an idiot.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>> Projecting again...idiot?

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> That's all you've got?

 

>>>>

 

>>> That is more than you can handle!

 

>>> Oops!

 

>>>

 

>>

 

>> You don't have much and *nothing* you post upsets me in any way, as much

 

>> as you'd like to think it does.

 

>

 

> HEHEHE...KEEP LYING...TO YOURSELF...HAHAHA!

 

 

 

Hate to burst your troll bubble but you are as significant as a gnat.

 

 

>

 

> I just consider the source and I know

 

>> you're a low life liar who is desperate to find something to put me down

 

>> with but, so far, all you have are LIES.

 

>

 

> I push all of your hate/anger buttons at will...my will. I say jump and

 

> you say "how high"!

 

> Oops!...LOL!

 

>

 

>

 

>

 

 

 

No, you don't. You think you do. You think you're cute and clever. You

 

think you've kicked the ass of multiple posters here. You think you can

 

fool people into thinking your rich and own property in France. Guess

 

what? No one believes you and no one comes round to say you've done any

 

of the above except YOU.

 

 

 

--

 

Alias

On 08/04/2010 04:57 PM, Frank wrote:

 

> On 8/4/2010 7:45 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>> On 08/04/2010 04:41 PM, Frank wrote:

 

>>> On 8/4/2010 2:36 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>>> On 08/04/2010 03:41 AM, Frank wrote:

 

>>>>> On 8/3/2010 5:57 PM, DanS wrote:

 

>>>>>>>> Taking sides are we? Why? Why not have both? MS for those

 

>>>>>>>> Windows programs that work better in Windows and Linux for

 

>>>>>>>> everything else but more securely.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> *BULLSHIT*!!!

 

>>>>>>> All anyone need for their computer use is Windows

 

>>>>>>> 7...PERIOD!!! Live with it.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> You can't run Pro-E Wildfire 3 for Linux under Windows.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Nor can you make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> You just got punked and all you can do is quote the fairy tale Bible?

 

>>>>

 

>>> You didn't even have to duck in order to miss that one!...LOL!

 

>>> Oops!

 

>>

 

>> Oh, I got it.

 

>

 

> No, it's obvious you didn't.

 

 

 

Yes, you think that Linux programs suck. It's obvious. If one can

 

understand Dick and Jane, one can understand your third grade posts.

 

 

>

 

> It wasn't as clever as you think.

 

>

 

> It was clever enough to stump an ignorant, unintelligent, uneducated

 

> bozo like you.

 

 

 

Erm, no it wasn't.

 

 

>

 

> Try running Compiz under

 

>> Windows.

 

>

 

> Only and a desperate loser like you would make a stupid statement like

 

> that.

 

> Oops!

 

>

 

 

 

We were talking about programs that will run in Linux but not in

 

Windows. You fell off the boat in the process and want to distract from

 

the fact that you're drowning in mistakes.

 

 

 

--

 

Alias

On 08/04/2010 04:59 PM, Frank wrote:

 

> On 8/4/2010 7:50 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>> On 08/04/2010 04:42 PM, Frank wrote:

 

>>> On 8/4/2010 7:26 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>>> On 8/4/2010 4:06 PM, Boscoe wrote:

 

>>>>> On 04/08/2010 10:40 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>> And your source for being able to read the minds of all of today's

 

>>>>>> Linux

 

>>>>>> users is?

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> They like to be seen as geeky and different. Not you because you use

 

>>>>> kids Linux...

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Have you always had a problem with thinking in this stereotypical

 

>>>> fashion? You do know what a stereotype is, or do you?

 

>>>>

 

>>> Projecting again, huh? You do know what projecting is, or do you?

 

>>

 

>> As predictable as the tide.

 

>

 

> Yes, you are.

 

>

 

> Yeah, I know what it is.

 

>

 

> I'm not to sure you really do.

 

>

 

> You plagiarized the

 

>> phrase from me a couple of years ago and have been using it multiple

 

>> times every fucking day since.

 

>

 

> Oh, so you're the first person to ever say that huh?...hahaha!

 

> Sure you are!

 

> Oh and you're misusing the term "plagiarized".

 

> Oops!

 

>

 

>

 

>

 

 

 

How about "stole"? Is that better? You never used that phrase until I

 

did, along with others of mine that you use over and over again. You're

 

not imaginative or very bright and everyone knows that but you.

 

 

 

--

 

Alias

On 08/04/2010 05:03 PM, Boscoe wrote:

 

> On 04/08/2010 3:42 PM, Frank wrote:

 

>> On 8/4/2010 7:26 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>> On 8/4/2010 4:06 PM, Boscoe wrote:

 

>>>> On 04/08/2010 10:40 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>>>

 

>>>>> And your source for being able to read the minds of all of today's

 

>>>>> Linux

 

>>>>> users is?

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> They like to be seen as geeky and different. Not you because you use

 

>>>> kids Linux...

 

>>>

 

>>> Have you always had a problem with thinking in this stereotypical

 

>>> fashion? You do know what a stereotype is, or do you?

 

>>>

 

>> Projecting again, huh? You do know what projecting is, or do you?

 

>

 

>

 

> He's stereotypical of the Linux troll. They despise Windows and use

 

> jargon which is deliberately contrived simply to make it appear

 

> different to Windows. 'Tux?, has spawned an entire sub-culture, a very

 

> small clique with visions of grandeur.

 

>

 

>

 

>

 

>

 

 

 

Um, I use Windows all the time. Oops. I belong to no clique, be it Linux

 

or otherwise. I use what works.

 

 

 

--

 

Alias

On 8/4/2010 8:03 AM, Alias wrote:

 

> On 08/04/2010 04:54 PM, Frank wrote:

 

>> On 8/4/2010 7:44 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>> On 08/04/2010 04:40 PM, Frank wrote:

 

>>>> On 8/4/2010 2:46 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>>>> On 08/04/2010 01:28 AM, Frank wrote:

 

>>>>>> On 8/3/2010 4:00 PM, Alias wrote:

 

>>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 10:13 PM, Pulled Pork wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>>>>>>> news:i39smj$qdq$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 09:55 PM, Boscoe wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 8:36 PM, DanS wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

 

>>>>>>>>>>> news:vBZ5o.4300$Pi3.3229@hurricane:

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 6:25 PM, DanS wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:1wV5o.18728$MQ3.2273@hurricane:

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 03/08/2010 9:12 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 08/03/2010 03:03 AM, DanS wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Boscoe wrote in

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:IxF5o.12302$7Z3.3276@hurricane:

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sh are .aspx?qprid=8>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ha Ha Ha

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Interestingly IE8 only took 10 months to become the

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> global browser leader.

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It it pushed through automatic updates ?

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course.

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You and your fellow Linux trolls never make much sense,

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do you?

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So explain the continued rise of Internet Explorer, which

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a reversal in the browser?s fortunes, which has

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> continually lost share to the likes of Firefox over the

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> last few years. So, much for the automatic updates?

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Idiots!!

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why so much for automatic updates ?

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's see.....IE *COMES* on the PC most buy that already

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>> *COMES* with Windows installed.......

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Most PCs come with automatic updates enabled, and set to

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>> automatically install any updates it finds....

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why is it so hard to accept this as a valid justification

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>> as to why IE8 was adopted quickly.

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Other than it goes against what you are trying to

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>> say....whatever that is.)

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> Well as you seem to be bit slow let me explain. Over the

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> last two years - with me so far? - IE has lost some of its

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> market share to Firefox. You know people switching to

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> Firefox... er... from IE Geddit?

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> Hard to imagine updating IE with Firefox, but there you

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> go, or in

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> your case there you don't. Now IE8 has once again

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> established itself as the ultimate browser by gaining back

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> more than it lost.

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>> So what you are saying is that in the previous 2 years, where

 

>>>>>>>>>>> the MS IE browser went from roughly 75% share to a low of

 

>>>>>>>>>>> 59.75%.......

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>> ....and in the past two months, it has 'skyrocketed' back to

 

>>>>>>>>>>> 60.74%.

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>> (These are the numbers listed form the site *you* linked.)

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.netmarketshare.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=

 

>>>>>>>>>>> 1&qptimeframe=M&qpsp=115&qpnp=25

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>> This is gaining back *more* than it lost ?

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>> And you call *me* slow ?

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>> You shouldn't have an attitude as you do when you don't even

 

>>>>>>>>>>> understand what the hell you are trying to say.

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> In-other-words, now people are

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> switching back from Firefox to IE8 in greater numbers than

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> ever before.

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> Now, that wasn't hard was it?

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>> To make you look like just another fool that doesn't even know

 

>>>>>>>>>>> he's trying to say ?

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>> Nope.

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> Yep...I just go by the facts...And IE8 is the global leader...

 

>>>>>>>>>> "it is

 

>>>>>>>>>> the second month in a row of global gains for

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> Internet Explorer and the third straight month of increasing

 

>>>>>>>>>> share in

 

>>>>>>>>>> the US.

 

>>>>>>>>>> The world?s most popular browser accounted for a 60.7 per cent

 

>>>>>>>>>> share of

 

>>>>>>>>>> the global browser market during July, up on the previous

 

>>>>>>>>>> month by

 

>>>>>>>>>> 0.4

 

>>>>>>>>>> per cent."

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> "Firefox?s market share peaked in April 2010, with 24.59 percent

 

>>>>>>>>>> and

 

>>>>>>>>>> has been declining ever since."

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> Anyway, better a fool than a Linux troll in a Windows froupe.

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> Taking sides are we? Why? Why not have both? MS for those Windows

 

>>>>>>>>> programs that work better in Windows and Linux for everything else

 

>>>>>>>>> but

 

>>>>>>>>> more securely. Computers aren't expensive these days and hard

 

>>>>>>>>> drives

 

>>>>>>>>> even cheaper. Hell, you could run Linux from a pen drive.

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> --

 

>>>>>>>>> Alias

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> So MS for those Windows programs that work better in Windows. - Hey

 

>>>>>>>> fuckwit - That would be all of them!

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Wrong.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> For everything else you don't need a computer and that makes Linux

 

>>>>>>>> worth

 

>>>>>>>> exactly what you pay for it: NOTHING.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Wrong.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> Better boot up your Linux pen and watch the spinning cube! LOL!

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> You're an idiot.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Projecting again...idiot?

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> That's all you've got?

 

>>>>>

 

>>>> That is more than you can handle!

 

>>>> Oops!

 

>>>>

 

>>>

 

>>> You don't have much and *nothing* you post upsets me in any way, as much

 

>>> as you'd like to think it does.

 

>>

 

>> HEHEHE...KEEP LYING...TO YOURSELF...HAHAHA!

 

>

 

> Hate to burst your troll bubble but you are as significant as a gnat.

 

 

 

You are as INSIGNIFICANT as a flea.

 

>

 

>>

 

>> I just consider the source and I know

 

>>> you're a low life liar who is desperate to find something to put me down

 

>>> with but, so far, all you have are LIES.

 

>>

 

>> I push all of your hate/anger buttons at will...my will. I say jump and

 

>> you say "how high"!

 

>> Oops!...LOL!

 

>>

 

>>

 

>>

 

>

 

> No, you don't. You think you do.

 

 

 

I know I do.

 

 

 

You think you're cute and clever.

 

 

 

More so than you'll ever be.

 

 

 

You

 

> think you've kicked the ass of multiple posters here.

 

 

 

I know I do. Butt [sic], you ass is my main target.

 

 

 

You think you can

 

> fool people into thinking your rich and own property in France.

 

 

 

You are the fool.

 

 

 

Guess

 

> what? No one believes you and no one comes round to say you've done any

 

> of the above except YOU.

 

 

 

Oh? Wanna meet me in Paris at my apartment? Or at my house in Louvier?

 

Well...?

 

 

>

On 8/4/2010 8:05 AM, Alias wrote:

 

> On 08/04/2010 04:57 PM, Frank wrote:

 

>> On 8/4/2010 7:45 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>> On 08/04/2010 04:41 PM, Frank wrote:

 

>>>> On 8/4/2010 2:36 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>>>> On 08/04/2010 03:41 AM, Frank wrote:

 

>>>>>> On 8/3/2010 5:57 PM, DanS wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>> Taking sides are we? Why? Why not have both? MS for those

 

>>>>>>>>> Windows programs that work better in Windows and Linux for

 

>>>>>>>>> everything else but more securely.

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> *BULLSHIT*!!!

 

>>>>>>>> All anyone need for their computer use is Windows

 

>>>>>>>> 7...PERIOD!!! Live with it.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> You can't run Pro-E Wildfire 3 for Linux under Windows.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Nor can you make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> You just got punked and all you can do is quote the fairy tale Bible?

 

>>>>>

 

>>>> You didn't even have to duck in order to miss that one!...LOL!

 

>>>> Oops!

 

>>>

 

>>> Oh, I got it.

 

>>

 

>> No, it's obvious you didn't.

 

>

 

> Yes, you think that Linux programs suck. It's obvious. If one can

 

> understand Dick and Jane, one can understand your third grade posts.

 

 

 

Oops...you did it again!...LOL!

 

>

 

>>

 

>> It wasn't as clever as you think.

 

>>

 

>> It was clever enough to stump an ignorant, unintelligent, uneducated

 

>> bozo like you.

 

>

 

> Erm, no it wasn't.

 

 

 

You proved i9t was!

 

Oops!

 

>

 

>>

 

>> Try running Compiz under

 

>>> Windows.

 

>>

 

>> Only and a desperate loser like you would make a stupid statement like

 

>> that.

 

>> Oops!

 

>>

 

>

 

> We were talking about programs that will run in Linux but not in

 

> Windows. You fell off the boat in the process and want to distract from

 

> the fact that you're drowning in mistakes.

 

 

 

OMG! You're really desperately stupid and you keep proving it!

 

Keep it up...I love watching you making a fool out of yourself in here!

On 04/08/2010 3:30 PM, Alias wrote:

 

> On 8/4/2010 4:11 PM, Boscoe wrote:

 

>> On 04/08/2010 10:42 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>> On 08/04/2010 01:28 AM, Boscoe wrote:

 

>>>> IE8 final code was released on 19 March 2009 and overtook IE6 in

 

>>>> February 2010 to become the most popular browser in the world.

 

>>>

 

>>> Real good reason not to use it as it is also the most attacked browser

 

>>> in the world. Combine that with the malware vulnerable Windows and

 

>>> you've got a great combo for a compromised computer.

 

>>>

 

>>

 

>> They're hardly going to target an O/S that has less than i% of the

 

>> market. Seen any malware written for Win 98 or 2000, lately?

 

>> LOL

 

>

 

> You snipped this:

 

>

 

> > Windows is not perfect but it's easy to use and

 

> > has made the computer so accessible to so many.

 

>

 

> Not so easy to use when it keeps giving you a BSOD or is compromised by

 

> malware.

 

>

 

> Well?

 

>

 

 

 

 

 

Quite well, and you?

 

 

 

A stereotypical answer from you-know-who. As has been pointed out many

 

times before, there's kudos for the imbeciles who specially write

 

malicious code for Windows. Like Linux users, it's their life and gives

 

them pleasure. Sad, init?

On 8/4/2010 8:06 AM, Alias wrote:

 

> On 08/04/2010 04:59 PM, Frank wrote:

 

>> On 8/4/2010 7:50 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>> On 08/04/2010 04:42 PM, Frank wrote:

 

>>>> On 8/4/2010 7:26 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>>>> On 8/4/2010 4:06 PM, Boscoe wrote:

 

>>>>>> On 04/08/2010 10:40 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> And your source for being able to read the minds of all of today's

 

>>>>>>> Linux

 

>>>>>>> users is?

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> They like to be seen as geeky and different. Not you because you use

 

>>>>>> kids Linux...

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Have you always had a problem with thinking in this stereotypical

 

>>>>> fashion? You do know what a stereotype is, or do you?

 

>>>>>

 

>>>> Projecting again, huh? You do know what projecting is, or do you?

 

>>>

 

>>> As predictable as the tide.

 

>>

 

>> Yes, you are.

 

>>

 

>> Yeah, I know what it is.

 

>>

 

>> I'm not to sure you really do.

 

>>

 

>> You plagiarized the

 

>>> phrase from me a couple of years ago and have been using it multiple

 

>>> times every fucking day since.

 

>>

 

>> Oh, so you're the first person to ever say that huh?...hahaha!

 

>> Sure you are!

 

>> Oh and you're misusing the term "plagiarized".

 

>> Oops!

 

>>

 

>>

 

>>

 

>

 

> How about "stole"? Is that better?

 

 

 

Oh so you think you own that statement? You are that stupid and that

 

arrogant, aren't you.

 

 

 

You never used that phrase until I

 

> did, along with others of mine that you use over and over again.

 

 

 

My. my, my...but you little ego is really bruised huh? Too bad

 

sheep-fucker. You'll just have to live with it.

 

 

 

You're

 

> not imaginative or very bright and everyone knows that but you.

 

 

 

But I can outwit you and kick your lamers ass at will!...hahaha!

 

Oops!

 

>

On 8/4/2010 8:09 AM, Alias wrote:

 

> On 08/04/2010 05:03 PM, Boscoe wrote:

 

>> On 04/08/2010 3:42 PM, Frank wrote:

 

>>> On 8/4/2010 7:26 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>>> On 8/4/2010 4:06 PM, Boscoe wrote:

 

>>>>> On 04/08/2010 10:40 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>> And your source for being able to read the minds of all of today's

 

>>>>>> Linux

 

>>>>>> users is?

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> They like to be seen as geeky and different. Not you because you use

 

>>>>> kids Linux...

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Have you always had a problem with thinking in this stereotypical

 

>>>> fashion? You do know what a stereotype is, or do you?

 

>>>>

 

>>> Projecting again, huh? You do know what projecting is, or do you?

 

>>

 

>>

 

>> He's stereotypical of the Linux troll. They despise Windows and use

 

>> jargon which is deliberately contrived simply to make it appear

 

>> different to Windows. 'Tux?, has spawned an entire sub-culture, a very

 

>> small clique with visions of grandeur.

 

>>

 

>>

 

>>

 

>>

 

>

 

> Um, I use Windows all the time. Oops. I belong to no clique, be it Linux

 

> or otherwise. I use what works.

 

>

 

LIAR! You're an MS hating, FUD spreading, lying linturd asshole loser.

On 8/4/2010 5:13 PM, Frank wrote:

 

> Oh? Wanna meet me in Paris at my apartment? Or at my house in Louvier?

 

> Well...?

 

 

 

Not really. In fact, I won't meet you anywhere. I don't want to waste my

 

time on a low life loser like you.

 

 

 

--

 

Alias

On 8/4/2010 5:19 PM, Frank wrote:

 

> But I can outwit you and kick your lamers ass at will!...hahaha!

 

> Oops!

 

 

 

LOL! You fucking wish. All you do, every day, is make a fool out of

 

yourself here.

 

 

 

--

 

Alias

On 8/4/2010 5:31 PM, Frank wrote:

 

> On 8/4/2010 8:09 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>> On 08/04/2010 05:03 PM, Boscoe wrote:

 

>>> On 04/08/2010 3:42 PM, Frank wrote:

 

>>>> On 8/4/2010 7:26 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>>>> On 8/4/2010 4:06 PM, Boscoe wrote:

 

>>>>>> On 04/08/2010 10:40 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> And your source for being able to read the minds of all of today's

 

>>>>>>> Linux

 

>>>>>>> users is?

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> They like to be seen as geeky and different. Not you because you use

 

>>>>>> kids Linux...

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Have you always had a problem with thinking in this stereotypical

 

>>>>> fashion? You do know what a stereotype is, or do you?

 

>>>>>

 

>>>> Projecting again, huh? You do know what projecting is, or do you?

 

>>>

 

>>>

 

>>> He's stereotypical of the Linux troll. They despise Windows and use

 

>>> jargon which is deliberately contrived simply to make it appear

 

>>> different to Windows. 'Tux?, has spawned an entire sub-culture, a very

 

>>> small clique with visions of grandeur.

 

>>>

 

>>>

 

>>>

 

>>>

 

>>

 

>> Um, I use Windows all the time. Oops. I belong to no clique, be it Linux

 

>> or otherwise. I use what works.

 

>>

 

> LIAR! You're an MS hating, FUD spreading, lying linturd asshole loser.

 

>

 

 

 

Read my headers. Windows 7 ain't bad considering it's Windows. I wish I

 

had gotten a faster computer, though, as i3 isn't all that fast with a

 

piggy Windows install.

 

 

 

--

 

Alias

On 8/4/2010 8:32 AM, Alias wrote:

 

> On 8/4/2010 5:13 PM, Frank wrote:

 

>> Oh? Wanna meet me in Paris at my apartment? Or at my house in Louvier?

 

>> Well...?

 

>

 

> Not really. In fact, I won't meet you anywhere. I don't want to waste my

 

> time on a low life loser like you.

 

>

 

YOUR COWARDICE IS NOTED.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...