Does anyone really care...?

 

On 7/7/2010 10:35 AM, DanS wrote:

 

> Frank wrote in news:4c349dce$1@news.x-privat.org:

 

>

 

>> On 7/7/2010 5:22 AM, DanS wrote:

 

>>> Frank wrote in news:4c33c738@news.x-

 

> privat.org:

 

>>>

 

>>>> On 7/6/2010 5:11 PM, DanS wrote:

 

>>>>> Frank wrote in

 

>>>>> news:4c33c123$1@news.x-privat.org:

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>> On 7/6/2010 2:59 PM, DanS wrote:

 

>>>>>>> Frank wrote in

 

>>>>>>> news:4c338d66$1@news.x-privat.org:

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> On 7/6/2010 1:00 PM, DanS wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>> Frank wrote in

 

>>>>>>>>> news:4c337e6c$1@news.x-privat.org:

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/2010 8:21 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> service-->

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> Maybe 3-5 people in here care about your

 

>>>>>>>>>> opinion...maybe!

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> Like I said....

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Lee than that care about your opinion.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>> Obviously you do!...LOL!

 

>>>>

 

>>>

 

>> WoW little boy. Do I push all of your buttons, or

 

> what?...LOL!

 

>>

 

>

 

> It is you who is owned. This entire part of the thread where I

 

> said absolutely nothing,...

 

 

 

You dumb fuck, you re-posted my post, which is a reply, you moron.

 

 

 

yet you replied to each and every one

 

> of them.

 

 

 

Yes, you did.

 

>

 

> Fool.

 

 

 

No, you're the GD fool, fool.

 

Now go fuck yourself, loser!

alias is taught a lesson...!

 

On 7/7/2010 1:07 PM, DanS wrote:

 

>>>>> You may have noticed that I advocate using both. How did

 

>>>>> you miss that or were you too busy nit picking?

 

>>>>

 

>>>> That is only a facade that you think allows you to openly

 

>>>> express your hatred for all things MS.

 

>>>

 

>>> You wish.

 

>>

 

>> I know and this entire ng knows.

 

>

 

> Now you are claiming that you know what every person in this

 

> newsgroup knows ?

 

>

 

 

 

Those who can read know. I guess that leaves you out, cock sucker.

 

 

>

 

>

 

>>>

 

>>> Read for content. I didn't write "entire governments".

 

>>

 

>> "governments" in the context you used clearly mean "the

 

>> entire government".

 

>>

 

>> You been caught lying through omission. The worst kind of

 

>> lying.

 

>

 

>>

 

>>>

 

>

 

>

 

>

 

>>>

 

>>> No, it's yours.

 

>>

 

>> How childish of you, seeing as how you've already used that

 

>> term twice today and it is a childish term I'd never use.

 

>

 

> Childish for using the same terms and saying over, and over,

 

> and over, and over again ?

 

 

 

Childish "term" you moron.

 

>

 

> That's *exactly* what you do, hypocrite.

 

 

 

Not what I say, you jackass.

 

 

>

 

>>>

 

>>>> Are you now

 

>>>> threatening physical violence when someone makes a fool

 

>>>> out of you...or you make a fool out of yourself and we

 

>>>> all let you know it? Oops!

 

>>>

 

>>> That would be your M.O.

 

>>

 

>> No, it is yours.

 

>>

 

>> You've threatened at least three people here and

 

>>> on Vista General.

 

>>

 

>> LIAR, never happened.

 

>

 

> You threatened Alias,...

 

 

 

Prove it, cock sucker.

 

Well...?

 

Oh, you can't cause I never did.

 

 

 

and demanded my contact information so

 

> you could kick my ass after I called your dog a

 

> wife.......er....your wife a dog. I'm sure there were others

 

> you had threatened.

 

 

 

Hey you stupid POS, I requested your name and addy so that you could

 

insult me to my face. Same thing I've done with every loser who insults

 

my family. That is not a threat, you moron.

 

However, you're too much of a *COWARD*, like alias is, to insult my

 

family to my face. You all big mouthed losers who hide behind your

 

keyboards are all afraid of me, and rightly so.

 

>

 

> Later, hypocrite.

 

>

 

Stick around cock sucker, I'm enjoying exposing your lies.

 

Asshole!

Does anyone really care...?

 

Frank wrote in

 

news:4c34e832$1@news.x-privat.org:

 

 

> On 7/7/2010 10:35 AM, DanS wrote:

 

>> Frank wrote in

 

>> news:4c349dce$1@news.x-privat.org:

 

>>

 

>>> On 7/7/2010 5:22 AM, DanS wrote:

 

>>>> Frank wrote in news:4c33c738@news.x-

 

>> privat.org:

 

>>>>

 

>>>>> On 7/6/2010 5:11 PM, DanS wrote:

 

>>>>>> Frank wrote in

 

>>>>>> news:4c33c123$1@news.x-privat.org:

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> On 7/6/2010 2:59 PM, DanS wrote:

 

>>>>>>>> Frank wrote in

 

>>>>>>>> news:4c338d66$1@news.x-privat.org:

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/2010 1:00 PM, DanS wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>>> Frank wrote in

 

>>>>>>>>>> news:4c337e6c$1@news.x-privat.org:

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/2010 8:21 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> service-->

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe 3-5 people in here care about your

 

>>>>>>>>>>> opinion...maybe!

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> Like I said....

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Lee than that care about your opinion.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>> Obviously you do!...LOL!

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>> WoW little boy. Do I push all of your buttons, or

 

>> what?...LOL!

 

>>>

 

>>

 

>> It is you who is owned. This entire part of the thread

 

>> where I said absolutely nothing,...

 

>

 

> You dumb fuck, you re-posted my post, which is a reply, you

 

> moron.

 

 

 

If all I did was repost your post, then you were replying to

 

yourself !!!!!!!!

 

 

 

 

 

I don't know who's more intelligent....you or Kevin Panzke.

Does anyone really care...?

 

On 7/7/2010 2:27 PM, DanS wrote:

 

> Frank wrote in

 

> news:4c34e832$1@news.x-privat.org:

 

>

 

>> On 7/7/2010 10:35 AM, DanS wrote:

 

>>> Frank wrote in

 

>>> news:4c349dce$1@news.x-privat.org:

 

>>>

 

>>>> On 7/7/2010 5:22 AM, DanS wrote:

 

>>>>> Frank wrote in news:4c33c738@news.x-

 

>>> privat.org:

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>> On 7/6/2010 5:11 PM, DanS wrote:

 

>>>>>>> Frank wrote in

 

>>>>>>> news:4c33c123$1@news.x-privat.org:

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> On 7/6/2010 2:59 PM, DanS wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>> Frank wrote in

 

>>>>>>>>> news:4c338d66$1@news.x-privat.org:

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/2010 1:00 PM, DanS wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>>>> Frank wrote in

 

>>>>>>>>>>> news:4c337e6c$1@news.x-privat.org:

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/2010 8:21 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> service-->

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe 3-5 people in here care about your

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> opinion...maybe!

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> Like I said....

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> Lee than that care about your opinion.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Obviously you do!...LOL!

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>> WoW little boy. Do I push all of your buttons, or

 

>>> what?...LOL!

 

>>>>

 

>>>

 

>>> It is you who is owned. This entire part of the thread

 

>>> where I said absolutely nothing,...

 

>>

 

>> You dumb fuck, you re-posted my post, which is a reply, you

 

>> moron.

 

>

 

> If all I did was repost your post, then you were replying to

 

> yourself !!!!!!!!

 

 

 

WoW! You're really an idiot! I didn't re-post my post so it's impossible

 

to reply to my own post.

 

>

 

>

 

> I don't know who's more intelligent....you or Kevin Panzke.

 

 

 

Leaves you out of the running.

 

Oops!

alias is taught a lesson...!

 

Frank wrote in news:4c34e9f3@news.x-privat.org:

 

 

> On 7/7/2010 1:07 PM, DanS wrote:

 

>>>>>> You may have noticed that I advocate using both. How

 

>>>>>> did you miss that or were you too busy nit picking?

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> That is only a facade that you think allows you to

 

>>>>> openly express your hatred for all things MS.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> You wish.

 

>>>

 

>>> I know and this entire ng knows.

 

>>

 

>> Now you are claiming that you know what every person in

 

>> this newsgroup knows ?

 

>>

 

>

 

> Those who can read know. I guess that leaves you out, cock

 

> sucker.

 

 

 

It's pretty obvious I can read.

 

 

>

 

>>

 

>>>

 

>>> How childish of you, seeing as how you've already used

 

>>> that term twice today and it is a childish term I'd never

 

>>> use.

 

>>

 

>> Childish for using the same terms and saying over, and

 

>> over, and over, and over again ?

 

>

 

> Childish "term" you moron.

 

>>

 

>> That's *exactly* what you do, hypocrite.

 

>

 

> Not what I say, you jackass.

 

 

 

Oops!!! (Over and over and over again.) = Childish

 

Addy = childish

 

LOL = childish

 

 

 

 

>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>>> Are you now

 

>>>>> threatening physical violence when someone makes a fool

 

>>>>> out of you...or you make a fool out of yourself and we

 

>>>>> all let you know it? Oops!

 

>>>>

 

>>>> That would be your M.O.

 

>>>

 

>>> No, it is yours.

 

>>>

 

>>> You've threatened at least three people here and

 

>>>> on Vista General.

 

>>>

 

>>> LIAR, never happened.

 

>>

 

>> You threatened Alias,...

 

>

 

> Prove it, cock sucker.

 

> Well...?

 

> Oh, you can't cause I never did.

 

 

 

Then what was it you were going to do when you went to Eurpope

 

and demanded his 'addy' ?

 

 

 

But wait....I digress....Ask and you shall receive....here's

 

your 'empirical' proof that you always ask for, hypocrite.

 

 

 

Here's the link.....

 

 

 

http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.windows.vista.

 

general/browse_thread/thread/d2a296cf5a8b3e51/0792b84d9b9bdc39

 

?q=alias+frank+europe+spain&lnk=ol&

 

 

 

In the thread, you say things like.......

 

 

 

".......No watching you being taken away by the ambulance is

 

the real "priceless" part...LOL!

 

Coward!

 

Frank"

 

 

 

"......You have every right to be afraid, I certainly would be

 

if I were you, especially after the way you denigrated my wife

 

and my daughter. There are consequences for that sort of

 

behavior.

 

Frank"

 

 

 

"....Well, let me have your address in spain, ok? I don't

 

think I'd kiss your ass...that's nostop, your butt-buddy's

 

job, but I'll sure bury my #13's in it...hahaha!

 

You're not afraid of me are you...LOL!

 

Frank"

 

 

 

Yeah....none of that sounds like threatening to me. OK.

 

 

 

I'd hate to call you a liar because that is childish, but

 

there you go....liar. Oh, or wait, you didn't mean those thing

 

like that ?....sure....OK....liar.

 

 

>

 

> and demanded my contact information so

 

>> you could kick my ass after I called your dog a

 

>> wife.......er....your wife a dog. I'm sure there were

 

>> others you had threatened.

 

>

 

> Hey you stupid POS, I requested your name and addy so that

 

> you could insult me to my face. Same thing I've done with

 

> every loser who insults my family.

 

 

 

Again.....why would many different people insult your family ?

 

 

 

It makes you wonder.....I don't insult anyone else or their

 

family. Others too, I'm sure. Yet with you, it seems to happen

 

over and over again. Why is that ?

 

 

 

 

> That is not a threat,

 

 

 

Like the threats to Alias weren't threats ?

 

 

> you moron. However, you're too much of a *COWARD*, like

 

> alias is, to insult my family to my face. You all big

 

> mouthed losers who hide behind your keyboards are all

 

> afraid of me, and rightly so.

 

 

 

Why, are you a huge rotund fellow of over 600 lbs that can

 

kill me by sitting on me ?

 

 

>>

 

>> Later, hypocrite.

 

>>

 

> Stick around cock sucker, I'm enjoying exposing your lies.

 

 

 

You mean like I just did above, where you claim to have never

 

threatened anyone ?

 

 

 

Fine, show me one.......just one, an outright lie, as you have

 

done above.

Does anyone really care...?

 

>> I don't know who's more intelligent....you or Kevin

 

>> Panzke.

 

>

 

> Leaves you out of the running.

 

> Oops!

 

 

 

That's because there's no question I am far more intelligent

 

than you. Or at the very least, far more civilized, clever,

 

personable, logical, and, much easier to get along with, if your

 

not an a**hole.

Does anyone really care...?

 

On 7/7/2010 3:09 PM, DanS wrote:

 

>>> I don't know who's more intelligent....you or Kevin

 

>>> Panzke.

 

>>

 

>> Leaves you out of the running.

 

>> Oops!

 

>

 

> That's because there's no question I am far more intelligent

 

> than you.

 

 

 

 

 

Hahaha...yeah, you're a legend in your own mind!

 

 

 

Or at the very least, far more civilized, clever,

 

> personable, logical, and, much easier to get along with, if your

 

> not an a**hole.

 

 

 

Sorry cock sucker, but you already proved just how very stupid you

 

really are when I cornered you in an argument and you crossed the line

 

in order to try and win by insulting my family.

 

You're a stupid, ignorant, uneducated, low-life POS loser and an asshole

 

punk.

 

Now fuck off!

 

>

 

>

 

>

DanS is a cock sucking POS *COWARD*!

 

On 7/7/2010 3:02 PM, DanS wrote:

 

> Frank wrote in news:4c34e9f3@news.x-privat.org:

 

>

 

>> On 7/7/2010 1:07 PM, DanS wrote:

 

>>>>>>> You may have noticed that I advocate using both. How

 

>>>>>>> did you miss that or were you too busy nit picking?

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> That is only a facade that you think allows you to

 

>>>>>> openly express your hatred for all things MS.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> You wish.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> I know and this entire ng knows.

 

>>>

 

>>> Now you are claiming that you know what every person in

 

>>> this newsgroup knows ?

 

>>>

 

>>

 

>> Those who can read know. I guess that leaves you out, cock

 

>> sucker.

 

>

 

> It's pretty obvious I can read.

 

 

 

It's pretty obvious you don't understand what you read.

 

>

 

>>

 

>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> How childish of you, seeing as how you've already used

 

>>>> that term twice today and it is a childish term I'd never

 

>>>> use.

 

>>>

 

>>> Childish for using the same terms and saying over, and

 

>>> over, and over, and over again ?

 

>>

 

>> Childish "term" you moron.

 

>>>

 

>>> That's *exactly* what you do, hypocrite.

 

>>

 

>> Not what I say, you jackass.

 

>

 

> Oops!!! (Over and over and over again.) = Childish

 

> Addy = childish

 

> LOL = childish

 

>

 

>

 

>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Are you now

 

>>>>>> threatening physical violence when someone makes a fool

 

>>>>>> out of you...or you make a fool out of yourself and we

 

>>>>>> all let you know it? Oops!

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> That would be your M.O.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> No, it is yours.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> You've threatened at least three people here and

 

>>>>> on Vista General.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> LIAR, never happened.

 

>>>

 

>>> You threatened Alias,...

 

>>

 

>> Prove it, cock sucker.

 

>> Well...?

 

>> Oh, you can't cause I never did.

 

>

 

> Then what was it you were going to do when you went to Eurpope

 

> and demanded his 'addy' ?

 

 

 

Give him the opportunity to apologize to me in person.

 

>

 

> But wait....I digress....Ask and you shall receive....here's

 

> your 'empirical' proof that you always ask for, hypocrite.

 

>

 

> Here's the link.....

 

>

 

> http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.windows.vista.

 

> general/browse_thread/thread/d2a296cf5a8b3e51/0792b84d9b9bdc39

 

> ?q=alias+frank+europe+spain&lnk=ol&

 

>

 

> In the thread, you say things like.......

 

>

 

> ".......No watching you being taken away by the ambulance is

 

> the real "priceless" part...LOL!

 

> Coward!

 

> Frank"

 

>

 

> "......You have every right to be afraid, I certainly would be

 

> if I were you, especially after the way you denigrated my wife

 

> and my daughter. There are consequences for that sort of

 

> behavior.

 

> Frank"

 

>

 

> "....Well, let me have your address in spain, ok? I don't

 

> think I'd kiss your ass...that's nostop, your butt-buddy's

 

> job, but I'll sure bury my #13's in it...hahaha!

 

> You're not afraid of me are you...LOL!

 

> Frank"

 

>

 

> Yeah....none of that sounds like threatening to me. OK.

 

>

 

> I'd hate to call you a liar because that is childish, but

 

> there you go....liar. Oh, or wait, you didn't mean those thing

 

> like that ?....sure....OK....liar.

 

>

 

>>

 

>> and demanded my contact information so

 

>>> you could kick my ass after I called your dog a

 

>>> wife.......er....your wife a dog. I'm sure there were

 

>>> others you had threatened.

 

>>

 

>> Hey you stupid POS, I requested your name and addy so that

 

>> you could insult me to my face. Same thing I've done with

 

>> every loser who insults my family.

 

>

 

> Again.....why would many different people insult your family ?

 

 

 

 

>

 

> It makes you wonder.....I don't insult anyone else or their

 

> family. Others too, I'm sure. Yet with you, it seems to happen

 

> over and over again. Why is that ?

 

 

 

You mean you and alias, the only two who when cornered, had to insult my

 

family to try and win an argument.

 

You two losers. You two low life POS assholes bitches.

 

You are the only two chicken shit cock sucking sons of bitches who have

 

ever done that.

 

 

>

 

>

 

>> That is not a threat,

 

>

 

> Like the threats to Alias weren't threats ?

 

>

 

>> you moron. However, you're too much of a *COWARD*, like

 

>> alias is, to insult my family to my face. You all big

 

>> mouthed losers who hide behind your keyboards are all

 

>> afraid of me, and rightly so.

 

>

 

> Why, are you a huge rotund fellow of over 600 lbs that can

 

> kill me by sitting on me ?

 

 

 

Just give me your real name an addy...I'll do the rest.

 

Well...?

 

 

>

 

>>>

 

>>> Later, hypocrite.

 

>>>

 

>> Stick around cock sucker, I'm enjoying exposing your lies.

 

>

 

> You mean like I just did above, where you claim to have never

 

> threatened anyone ?

 

 

 

LIAR! I invited the two of you *COWARDS* to repeat your insults to my face.

 

You are both afraid of me.

 

 

>

 

> Fine, show me one.......just one, an outright lie, as you have

 

> done above.

 

 

 

Obviously, you failed English comprehension.

DanS is a cock sucking POS *COWARD*!

 

>>>>>>> Are you now

 

>>>>>>> threatening physical violence when someone makes a

 

>>>>>>> fool out of you...or you make a fool out of yourself

 

>>>>>>> and we all let you know it? Oops!

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> That would be your M.O.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> No, it is yours.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> You've threatened at least three people here and

 

>>>>>> on Vista General.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> LIAR, never happened.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> You threatened Alias,...

 

>>>

 

>>> Prove it, cock sucker.

 

>>> Well...?

 

>>> Oh, you can't cause I never did.

 

>>

 

>> Then what was it you were going to do when you went to

 

>> Eurpope and demanded his 'addy' ?

 

>

 

> Give him the opportunity to apologize to me in person.

 

 

 

Ha-ha.....right.

 

 

 

 

>>

 

>> But wait....I digress....Ask and you shall

 

>> receive....here's your 'empirical' proof that you always

 

>> ask for, hypocrite.

 

>>

 

>> Here's the link.....

 

>>

 

>> http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.windows.vis

 

>> ta.

 

>> general/browse_thread/thread/d2a296cf5a8b3e51/0792b84d9b9bd

 

>> c39 ?q=alias+frank+europe+spain&lnk=ol&

 

>>

 

>> In the thread, you say things like.......

 

>>

 

>> ".......No watching you being taken away by the ambulance

 

>> is the real "priceless" part...LOL!

 

>> Coward!

 

>> Frank"

 

>>

 

>> "......You have every right to be afraid, I certainly

 

>> would be if I were you, especially after the way you

 

>> denigrated my wife and my daughter. There are consequences

 

>> for that sort of behavior.

 

>> Frank"

 

>>

 

>> "....Well, let me have your address in spain, ok? I don't

 

>> think I'd kiss your ass...that's nostop, your butt-buddy's

 

>> job, but I'll sure bury my #13's in it...hahaha!

 

>> You're not afraid of me are you...LOL!

 

>> Frank"

 

>>

 

>> Yeah....none of that sounds like threatening to me. OK.

 

>>

 

>> I'd hate to call you a liar because that is childish, but

 

>> there you go....liar. Oh, or wait, you didn't mean those

 

>> thing like that ?....sure....OK....liar.

 

>>

 

 

 

So stop right there.

 

 

 

I want you to address your not threatening anyone

 

above....which was a *huge* lie.

 

 

 

I'm suprised you even included it in your reply.

 

 

 

Seeing him taken away in an ambulance isn't a threat ?

 

 

 

Burying your size 13 in his ass isn't a threat ?

 

 

 

So now I can call you Frank, the known and empirically proven

 

liar.

 

 

 

I can post the above again, and again, and again, like a

 

little baby, like you do.

DanS is a cock sucking POS *COWARD*!

 

On 7/7/2010 4:09 PM, DanS wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Just tell me one thing, cock sucker...why did you insult my family, huh?

 

Well...?

The Differences and Similarities Between Windows 7 and Ubuntu Lucid Lynx

 

> You keep bemoaning the un safeness of Windows, so tell me,

 

> why is it that I have never had, with but one exception,

 

> and that from a pirated disk copy, had a virus or other

 

> form of mal ware that effected the operation of my computer

 

> in all the years I've been using one, and I do back to the

 

> Apple Dos days on home machines and earlier as a user of

 

> community machines.

 

>

 

> Is this because I am such a super man,

 

> or is it that

 

> perhaps, with even slightly sensible use, that mal ware is

 

> not the demon that you portray it as.

 

 

 

So since you haven't had a problem with malware, that means

 

there isn't a problem ?

 

 

 

I haven't had a problem either, but I don't deny the existance

 

of the problem.

 

 

 

You have 20-30 years of experience in the computing

 

field/computers........ how many years does the average 10-12

 

year old have ?

 

 

 

I've got no moving violations in my driving career, so no one

 

else gets tickets ?

The Differences and Similarities Between Windows 7 and UbuntuLucid Lynx

 

On 07/06/2010 05:21 PM, Alias wrote:

 

> Aero Glass vs. Compiz

 

>

 

> Compiz beats out Aero hands down due Compiz being much more configurable.

 

>

 

> Work Stations

 

>

 

> Ubuntu beats out Windows 7 because it has more than one work station or

 

> desktop. To get more than one with Windows 7, one has to spend money on

 

> a third part program.

 

>

 

> File search

 

>

 

> Windows 7's file search is far superior to the one that comes with XP

 

> but is slow compared to Ubuntu.

 

>

 

> File transfer

 

>

 

> Windows is still slower than Linux.

 

>

 

> Internet speeds

 

>

 

> Windows is still slower than Linux.

 

>

 

> Boot up time.

 

>

 

> Windows is still slower than Linux.

 

>

 

> Safe surfing

 

>

 

> Windows is still more vulnerable than Linux.

 

>

 

> Games that come with Windows

 

>

 

> I prefer the ones that come with XP over 7. Even Spider Solitaire is

 

> quicker in XP than Windows 7. Ubuntu comes with a lot more preloaded

 

> than either 7 or XP. Ubuntu wins again.

 

>

 

> Wallpaper and themes

 

>

 

> Windows 7 does win on this one as the wallpapers and themes are pretty

 

> cool in 7.

 

>

 

> Cost:

 

>

 

> To have Windows 7 with PhotoShop and MS Office, we're talking more than

 

> a grand you have to spend. Of course, with Ubuntu, the cost is nothing.

 

> Ubuntu wins again.

 

>

 

> All and all, Windows 7 is much better than XP but pales compared to Ubuntu.

 

>

 

 

 

Another difference is that Windows 7 needs at least a gig of memory when

 

it's idle. Ubuntu only needs around 400 megs.

 

 

 

--

 

Alias

The Differences and Similarities Between Windows 7 and UbuntuLucid Lynx

 

On 07/08/2010 02:31 PM, DanS wrote:

 

>> You keep bemoaning the un safeness of Windows, so tell me,

 

>> why is it that I have never had, with but one exception,

 

>> and that from a pirated disk copy, had a virus or other

 

>> form of mal ware that effected the operation of my computer

 

>> in all the years I've been using one, and I do back to the

 

>> Apple Dos days on home machines and earlier as a user of

 

>> community machines.

 

>>

 

>> Is this because I am such a super man,

 

>> or is it that

 

>> perhaps, with even slightly sensible use, that mal ware is

 

>> not the demon that you portray it as.

 

>

 

> So since you haven't had a problem with malware, that means

 

> there isn't a problem ?

 

>

 

> I haven't had a problem either, but I don't deny the existance

 

> of the problem.

 

>

 

> You have 20-30 years of experience in the computing

 

> field/computers........ how many years does the average 10-12

 

> year old have ?

 

>

 

> I've got no moving violations in my driving career, so no one

 

> else gets tickets ?

 

 

 

You better watch it Jon doesn't do logic very well.

 

 

 

--

 

Alias

The Differences and Similarities Between Windows 7 and UbuntuLucid Lynx

 

On 7/8/2010 5:31 AM, DanS wrote:

 

>> You keep bemoaning the un safeness of Windows, so tell me,

 

>> why is it that I have never had, with but one exception,

 

>> and that from a pirated disk copy, had a virus or other

 

>> form of mal ware that effected the operation of my computer

 

>> in all the years I've been using one, and I do back to the

 

>> Apple Dos days on home machines and earlier as a user of

 

>> community machines.

 

>>

 

>> Is this because I am such a super man,

 

>> or is it that

 

>> perhaps, with even slightly sensible use, that mal ware is

 

>> not the demon that you portray it as.

 

>

 

> So since you haven't had a problem with malware, that means

 

> there isn't a problem ?

 

>

 

No, but that doesn't mean there is.

 

Oops!

 

 

> I haven't had a problem either, but I don't deny the existance

 

> of the problem.

 

 

 

Nor do I.

 

>

 

> You have 20-30 years of experience in the computing

 

> field/computers........ how many years does the average 10-12

 

> year old have ?

 

 

 

Who cares?

 

 

>

 

> I've got no moving violations in my driving career, so no one

 

> else gets tickets ?

 

 

 

That is a one of your more stupid statements.

 

 

 

Question Did you ever actually use Vista in a production environment?

 

 

>

 

>

 

>

 

>

 

>

 

>

 

>

The Differences and Similarities Between Windows 7 and UbuntuLucid Lynx

 

On 7/8/2010 7:51 AM, Alias wrote:

 

> On 07/06/2010 05:21 PM, Alias wrote:

 

>> Aero Glass vs. Compiz

 

>>

 

>> Compiz beats out Aero hands down due Compiz being much more configurable.

 

>>

 

>> Work Stations

 

>>

 

>> Ubuntu beats out Windows 7 because it has more than one work station or

 

>> desktop. To get more than one with Windows 7, one has to spend money on

 

>> a third part program.

 

>>

 

>> File search

 

>>

 

>> Windows 7's file search is far superior to the one that comes with XP

 

>> but is slow compared to Ubuntu.

 

>>

 

>> File transfer

 

>>

 

>> Windows is still slower than Linux.

 

>>

 

>> Internet speeds

 

>>

 

>> Windows is still slower than Linux.

 

>>

 

>> Boot up time.

 

>>

 

>> Windows is still slower than Linux.

 

>>

 

>> Safe surfing

 

>>

 

>> Windows is still more vulnerable than Linux.

 

>>

 

>> Games that come with Windows

 

>>

 

>> I prefer the ones that come with XP over 7. Even Spider Solitaire is

 

>> quicker in XP than Windows 7. Ubuntu comes with a lot more preloaded

 

>> than either 7 or XP. Ubuntu wins again.

 

>>

 

>> Wallpaper and themes

 

>>

 

>> Windows 7 does win on this one as the wallpapers and themes are pretty

 

>> cool in 7.

 

>>

 

>> Cost:

 

>>

 

>> To have Windows 7 with PhotoShop and MS Office, we're talking more than

 

>> a grand you have to spend. Of course, with Ubuntu, the cost is nothing.

 

>> Ubuntu wins again.

 

>>

 

>> All and all, Windows 7 is much better than XP but pales compared to

 

>> Ubuntu.

 

>>

 

>

 

> Another difference is that Windows 7 needs at least a gig of memory when

 

> it's idle. Ubuntu only needs around 400 megs.

 

>

 

Who, other than you, really cares?

The Differences and Similarities Between Windows 7 and Ubuntu Lucid Lynx

 

On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 16:51:02 +0200, Alias

 

wrote:

 

 

>On 07/06/2010 05:21 PM, Alias wrote:

 

>> Aero Glass vs. Compiz

 

 

>> Cost:

 

>>

 

>> To have Windows 7 with PhotoShop and MS Office, we're talking more than

 

>> a grand you have to spend. Of course, with Ubuntu, the cost is nothing.

 

>> Ubuntu wins again.

 

>>

 

 

 

Ah Ha! Alias can have Ubuntu WITH Photoshop and MS Office ... for

 

free?

 

 

 

Been downloading those pirated copies again haven't you. Now we know

 

why you have all the problems with Malware since as everyone knows

 

the Warz are full of it.

 

 

>> All and all, Windows 7 is much better than XP but pales compared to Ubuntu.

 

>>

 

>

 

>Another difference is that Windows 7 needs at least a gig of memory when

 

>it's idle. Ubuntu only needs around 400 megs.

 

 

 

And how did you determine that little gem of wisdom? By using the

 

Ubuntu furnished Gnome System Monitor? If so My Ubuntu almost always

 

reads 20% of memory and 0 % of swap space, or approximately 800 meg of

 

memory.

 

 

 

4 gigabytes = 4 X 1024 X 1024 X 1024 Right? Or are there some 1000's

 

in the calculation somewhere? Well, to avoid an argument, call it

 

4,000,000,000 X .2 = 800,000,000...

 

 

 

How come your Ubuntu uses so much less memory then mine? Or are you

 

lying again Alias?

 

 

 

 

 

Cheers,

 

 

 

John D. Slocomb

 

(jdslocombatgmail)

The Differences and Similarities Between Windows 7 and UbuntuLucid Lynx

 

On 7/9/2010 2:44 AM, J. D. Slocomb wrote:

 

> On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 16:51:02 +0200, Alias

 

> wrote:

 

>

 

>> On 07/06/2010 05:21 PM, Alias wrote:

 

>>> Aero Glass vs. Compiz

 

>

 

>>> Cost:

 

>>>

 

>>> To have Windows 7 with PhotoShop and MS Office, we're talking more than

 

>>> a grand you have to spend. Of course, with Ubuntu, the cost is nothing.

 

>>> Ubuntu wins again.

 

>>>

 

>

 

> Ah Ha! Alias can have Ubuntu WITH Photoshop and MS Office ... for

 

> free?

 

 

 

Not needed when GIMP and Open Office are free and meet most people's needs.

 

 

>

 

> Been downloading those pirated copies again haven't you.

 

 

 

No and have you got proof of this other than your twisted and desperate

 

imagination?

 

 

> Now we know

 

> why you have all the problems with Malware since as everyone knows

 

> the Warz are full of it.

 

 

 

I don't download pirated software so that's one of your snarky theories

 

out the window and I make money cleaning malware off computers so, no, I

 

don't have a problem with malware, your desperate desire that I do

 

notwithstanding.

 

 

>

 

>>> All and all, Windows 7 is much better than XP but pales compared to Ubuntu.

 

>>>

 

>>

 

>> Another difference is that Windows 7 needs at least a gig of memory when

 

>> it's idle. Ubuntu only needs around 400 megs.

 

>

 

> And how did you determine that little gem of wisdom? By using the

 

> Ubuntu furnished Gnome System Monitor?

 

 

 

Yep.

 

 

> If so My Ubuntu almost always

 

> reads 20% of memory and 0 % of swap space, or approximately 800 meg of

 

> memory.

 

 

 

You've probably installed something that's eating up your RAM. Check

 

what processes are running. Tell me the first two on the list.

 

 

>

 

> 4 gigabytes = 4 X 1024 X 1024 X 1024 Right? Or are there some 1000's

 

> in the calculation somewhere? Well, to avoid an argument, call it

 

> 4,000,000,000 X .2 = 800,000,000...

 

 

 

Gosh the man knows some arithmetic!

 

 

>

 

> How come your Ubuntu uses so much less memory then mine? Or are you

 

> lying again Alias?

 

>

 

>

 

> Cheers,

 

>

 

> John D. Slocomb

 

> (jdslocombatgmail)

 

 

 

I never lie and that's what my Ubuntu install is using when idle.

 

--

 

Alias

The Differences and Similarities Between Windows 7 and UbuntuLucid Lynx

 

On 07/06/2010 09:21 AM, Alias wrote:

 

> Aero Glass vs. Compiz

 

>

 

> Compiz beats out Aero hands down due Compiz being much more configurable.

 

 

 

LOL I have been saying that for some time now, and I STILL maintain that

 

MS should have adopted the USEFUL parts of Compiz and/or OSX desktop

 

effects, and just absorbed the flack from purest A-holes. The GENERAL

 

user would love it and care less about the origins. As it is they STILL

 

didn't write in hot corners to activate Flip 3d etc. Dopes, one still

 

has to DL 3rd party apps to do it and other things.

 

 

> Work Stations

 

>

 

> Ubuntu beats out Windows 7 because it has more than one work station or

 

> desktop. To get more than one with Windows 7, one has to spend money on

 

> a third part program.

 

 

 

While virtual desktops is useful for many, I myself don't have much use

 

for them. However, MANY love that feature in Linux. There are clunky 3rd

 

party apps to do that in Winders, but as usual they suck up resources,

 

and are as smooth in implementation as a New York City road. LOL I

 

installed an expose, or in Linux it is called Scale app in Win7 and

 

while very useful, is WAY choppy/clunky compared to the Compiz version

 

on the same machine.

 

 

> File search

 

>

 

> Windows 7's file search is far superior to the one that comes with XP

 

> but is slow compared to Ubuntu.

 

 

 

Agreed.

 

 

> File transfer

 

>

 

> Windows is still slower than Linux.

 

 

 

Way agreed. I thought Win7 would be more improved, but alas no. I really

 

don't know what posesses the MS developers, but they just can't seem to

 

get it right in very important areas.

 

 

> Internet speeds

 

>

 

> Windows is still slower than Linux.

 

 

 

Agreed again. I surf WAY faster in Linux with Firefox, but then I surf

 

way faster in Win7 with Firefox than IE. lol

 

 

> Boot up time.

 

>

 

> Windows is still slower than Linux.

 

 

 

Slightly on my machines, but not enough to be annoyed either way.

 

 

> Safe surfing

 

>

 

> Windows is still more vulnerable than Linux.

 

 

 

WAY LOL (Enter the Frankenmonkey to attempt to debunk facts.) At My main

 

place of employment, they CONSTANTLY fight with Winders and security

 

problems regardless the elite security crap programs they install. I

 

just sit back and laugh.

 

 

> Games that come with Windows

 

>

 

> I prefer the ones that come with XP over 7. Even Spider Solitaire is

 

> quicker in XP than Windows 7. Ubuntu comes with a lot more preloaded

 

> than either 7 or XP. Ubuntu wins again.

 

 

 

I'm not a "gamer" as I have WAY more important things to attend to, thus

 

my rare appearance here, But between Linux and Winders, I get what I may

 

need for temp distractions.

 

 

> Wallpaper and themes

 

>

 

> Windows 7 does win on this one as the wallpapers and themes are pretty

 

> cool in 7.

 

 

 

Yes I totally agree, however if you install Wally in Linux and get some

 

awesome wallpapers, you too can have wallpaper sideshows in Linux. No

 

big deal. BUT, WTF is the deal with NO decent sound schemes in Linux??

 

Particularly Ubuntu? It seems they don't give a rat's a** about any of

 

that ear-candy. (Scull candy?)

 

 

> Cost:

 

>

 

> To have Windows 7 with PhotoShop and MS Office, we're talking more than

 

> a grand you have to spend. Of course, with Ubuntu, the cost is nothing.

 

 

 

Well to just buy the OS isn't all that bad for the latest ver, but add

 

all the needed stuff for many people then yeah, the cost goes up

 

exponentially.

 

 

> Ubuntu wins again.

 

>

 

> All and all, Windows 7 is much better than XP but pales compared to Ubuntu.

 

 

 

I do like Win7 MUCH better than the previous releases and use it as

 

needed, but for various reasons will still use Linux for other needs. I

 

like 'em both and use them for the best of BOTH worlds. A-holes that

 

can't grasp that concept are just sad, narrow-minded dopes, that are one

 

dimensional morons.

 

 

 

G'day

The Differences and Similarities Between Windows 7 and Ubuntu Lucid Lynx

 

On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 12:57:55 +0200, Alias

 

wrote:

 

 

>On 7/9/2010 2:44 AM, J. D. Slocomb wrote:

 

>> On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 16:51:02 +0200, Alias

 

>> wrote:

 

>>

 

>>> On 07/06/2010 05:21 PM, Alias wrote:

 

>>>> Aero Glass vs. Compiz

 

>>

 

>>>> Cost:

 

>>>>

 

>>>> To have Windows 7 with PhotoShop and MS Office, we're talking more than

 

>>>> a grand you have to spend. Of course, with Ubuntu, the cost is nothing.

 

>>>> Ubuntu wins again.

 

>>>>

 

>>

 

>> Ah Ha! Alias can have Ubuntu WITH Photoshop and MS Office ... for

 

>> free?

 

>

 

>Not needed when GIMP and Open Office are free and meet most people's needs.

 

>

 

But that is not what you said - you said "To have Windows 7 with

 

PhotoShop and MS Office, we're talking more than a grand you have to

 

spend. Of course, with Ubuntu, the cost is nothing.

 

Ubuntu wins again."

 

 

 

You notice that you specifically state "Photoshop and MS Office" and I

 

ask you again how you can do that unless you are using pirated copies?

 

 

 

You didn't say a MS Office "look alike", you specified "MS Office".

 

 

 

In short, either you steal your software or you tell lies. Tell us

 

Alias, which is it?

 

 

>>

 

>> Been downloading those pirated copies again haven't you.

 

>

 

>No and have you got proof of this other than your twisted and desperate

 

>imagination?

 

>

 

>> Now we know

 

>> why you have all the problems with Malware since as everyone knows

 

>> the Warz are full of it.

 

>

 

>I don't download pirated software so that's one of your snarky theories

 

>out the window and I make money cleaning malware off computers so, no, I

 

>don't have a problem with malware, your desperate desire that I do

 

>notwithstanding.

 

>

 

>>

 

>>>> All and all, Windows 7 is much better than XP but pales compared to Ubuntu.

 

>>>>

 

>>>

 

>>> Another difference is that Windows 7 needs at least a gig of memory when

 

>>> it's idle. Ubuntu only needs around 400 megs.

 

>>

 

>> And how did you determine that little gem of wisdom? By using the

 

>> Ubuntu furnished Gnome System Monitor?

 

>

 

>Yep.

 

>

 

>> If so My Ubuntu almost always

 

>> reads 20% of memory and 0 % of swap space, or approximately 800 meg of

 

>> memory.

 

>

 

>You've probably installed something that's eating up your RAM. Check

 

>what processes are running. Tell me the first two on the list.

 

>

 

>>

 

>> 4 gigabytes = 4 X 1024 X 1024 X 1024 Right? Or are there some 1000's

 

>> in the calculation somewhere? Well, to avoid an argument, call it

 

>> 4,000,000,000 X .2 = 800,000,000...

 

>

 

>Gosh the man knows some arithmetic!

 

>

 

>>

 

>> How come your Ubuntu uses so much less memory then mine? Or are you

 

>> lying again Alias?

 

>>

 

>>

 

>> Cheers,

 

>>

 

>> John D. Slocomb

 

>> (jdslocombatgmail)

 

>

 

>I never lie and that's what my Ubuntu install is using when idle.

 

 

 

I

 

Cheers,

 

 

 

John D. Slocomb

 

(jdslocombatgmail)

The Differences and Similarities Between Windows 7 and Ubuntu Lucid Lynx

 

On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 12:57:55 +0200, Alias

 

wrote:

 

 

>On 7/9/2010 2:44 AM, J. D. Slocomb wrote:

 

>> On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 16:51:02 +0200, Alias

 

>> wrote:

 

>>

 

>>> On 07/06/2010 05:21 PM, Alias wrote:

 

>>>> Aero Glass vs. Compiz

 

>>

 

>>>> Cost:

 

>>>>

 

>>>> To have Windows 7 with PhotoShop and MS Office, we're talking more than

 

>>>> a grand you have to spend. Of course, with Ubuntu, the cost is nothing.

 

>>>> Ubuntu wins again.

 

>>>>

 

>>

 

>> Ah Ha! Alias can have Ubuntu WITH Photoshop and MS Office ... for

 

>> free?

 

>

 

>Not needed when GIMP and Open Office are free and meet most people's needs.

 

>

 

>>

 

>> Been downloading those pirated copies again haven't you.

 

>

 

>No and have you got proof of this other than your twisted and desperate

 

>imagination?

 

>

 

>> Now we know

 

>> why you have all the problems with Malware since as everyone knows

 

>> the Warz are full of it.

 

>

 

>I don't download pirated software so that's one of your snarky theories

 

>out the window and I make money cleaning malware off computers so, no, I

 

>don't have a problem with malware, your desperate desire that I do

 

>notwithstanding.

 

>

 

>>

 

>>>> All and all, Windows 7 is much better than XP but pales compared to Ubuntu.

 

>>>>

 

>>>

 

>>> Another difference is that Windows 7 needs at least a gig of memory when

 

>>> it's idle. Ubuntu only needs around 400 megs.

 

>>

 

>> And how did you determine that little gem of wisdom? By using the

 

>> Ubuntu furnished Gnome System Monitor?

 

>

 

>Yep.

 

>

 

>> If so My Ubuntu almost always

 

>> reads 20% of memory and 0 % of swap space, or approximately 800 meg of

 

>> memory.

 

>

 

>You've probably installed something that's eating up your RAM. Check

 

>what processes are running. Tell me the first two on the list.

 

>

 

>>

 

>> 4 gigabytes = 4 X 1024 X 1024 X 1024 Right? Or are there some 1000's

 

>> in the calculation somewhere? Well, to avoid an argument, call it

 

>> 4,000,000,000 X .2 = 800,000,000...

 

>

 

>Gosh the man knows some arithmetic!

 

>

 

>>

 

>> How come your Ubuntu uses so much less memory then mine? Or are you

 

>> lying again Alias?

 

>>

 

>>

 

>> Cheers,

 

>>

 

>> John D. Slocomb

 

>> (jdslocombatgmail)

 

>

 

>I never lie and that's what my Ubuntu install is using when idle.

 

 

 

 

 

You sure that you aren't spoofing us, are you? Or do you mean that the

 

more or sell 160 tasks that are normally running in a Subunit

 

installation are "idle".

 

 

 

And I still suggest that you are blowing smoke. Try "top" and report

 

back. I have 906,284 bytes of memory in use with nothing but "top"

 

running and you are telling me that you have less?

 

 

 

Or you read that in a magazine somewhere and are repeating it because

 

you don't know how to tell what your system is doing?

 

 

 

Cheers,

 

 

 

John D. Slocomb

 

(jdslocombatgmail)

The Differences and Similarities Between Windows 7 and UbuntuLucid Lynx

 

On 7/9/2010 1:27 PM, J. D. Slocomb wrote:

 

> On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 12:57:55 +0200, Alias

 

> wrote:

 

>

 

>> On 7/9/2010 2:44 AM, J. D. Slocomb wrote:

 

>>> On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 16:51:02 +0200, Alias

 

>>> wrote:

 

>>>

 

>>>> On 07/06/2010 05:21 PM, Alias wrote:

 

>>>>> Aero Glass vs. Compiz

 

>>>

 

>>>>> Cost:

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> To have Windows 7 with PhotoShop and MS Office, we're talking more than

 

>>>>> a grand you have to spend. Of course, with Ubuntu, the cost is nothing.

 

>>>>> Ubuntu wins again.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>

 

>>> Ah Ha! Alias can have Ubuntu WITH Photoshop and MS Office ... for

 

>>> free?

 

>>

 

>> Not needed when GIMP and Open Office are free and meet most people's needs.

 

>>

 

> But that is not what you said - you said "To have Windows 7 with

 

> PhotoShop and MS Office, we're talking more than a grand you have to

 

> spend. Of course, with Ubuntu, the cost is nothing.

 

> Ubuntu wins again."

 

>

 

> You notice that you specifically state "Photoshop and MS Office" and I

 

> ask you again how you can do that unless you are using pirated copies?

 

>

 

> You didn't say a MS Office "look alike", you specified "MS Office".

 

>

 

> In short, either you steal your software or you tell lies. Tell us

 

> Alias, which is it?

 

 

 

You're nit picking again. Bad habit. I of course meant that Open Office

 

and GIMP would replace Photoshop and MS Office. I don't steal software

 

and I don't lie. Your reading more into what I meant isn't a lie but

 

just you being your nit picking self.

 

 

>

 

>>>

 

>>> Been downloading those pirated copies again haven't you.

 

>>

 

>> No and have you got proof of this other than your twisted and desperate

 

>> imagination?

 

>>

 

>>> Now we know

 

>>> why you have all the problems with Malware since as everyone knows

 

>>> the Warz are full of it.

 

>>

 

>> I don't download pirated software so that's one of your snarky theories

 

>> out the window and I make money cleaning malware off computers so, no, I

 

>> don't have a problem with malware, your desperate desire that I do

 

>> notwithstanding.

 

>>

 

>>>

 

>>>>> All and all, Windows 7 is much better than XP but pales compared to Ubuntu.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Another difference is that Windows 7 needs at least a gig of memory when

 

>>>> it's idle. Ubuntu only needs around 400 megs.

 

>>>

 

>>> And how did you determine that little gem of wisdom? By using the

 

>>> Ubuntu furnished Gnome System Monitor?

 

>>

 

>> Yep.

 

>>

 

>>> If so My Ubuntu almost always

 

>>> reads 20% of memory and 0 % of swap space, or approximately 800 meg of

 

>>> memory.

 

>>

 

>> You've probably installed something that's eating up your RAM. Check

 

>> what processes are running. Tell me the first two on the list.

 

>>

 

>>>

 

>>> 4 gigabytes = 4 X 1024 X 1024 X 1024 Right? Or are there some 1000's

 

>>> in the calculation somewhere? Well, to avoid an argument, call it

 

>>> 4,000,000,000 X .2 = 800,000,000...

 

>>

 

>> Gosh the man knows some arithmetic!

 

>>

 

>>>

 

>>> How come your Ubuntu uses so much less memory then mine? Or are you

 

>>> lying again Alias?

 

>>>

 

>>>

 

>>> Cheers,

 

>>>

 

>>> John D. Slocomb

 

>>> (jdslocombatgmail)

 

>>

 

>> I never lie and that's what my Ubuntu install is using when idle.

 

>

 

> I

 

> Cheers,

 

>

 

> John D. Slocomb

 

> (jdslocombatgmail)

 

 

 

"I"?

 

 

 

--

 

Alias

The Differences and Similarities Between Windows 7 and UbuntuLucid Lynx

 

On 7/9/2010 1:19 PM, Muad'Dib wrote:

 

> On 07/06/2010 09:21 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>> Aero Glass vs. Compiz

 

>>

 

>> Compiz beats out Aero hands down due Compiz being much more configurable.

 

>

 

> LOL I have been saying that for some time now, and I STILL maintain that

 

> MS should have adopted the USEFUL parts of Compiz and/or OSX desktop

 

> effects, and just absorbed the flack from purest A-holes. The GENERAL

 

> user would love it and care less about the origins. As it is they STILL

 

> didn't write in hot corners to activate Flip 3d etc. Dopes, one still

 

> has to DL 3rd party apps to do it and other things.

 

>

 

>> Work Stations

 

>>

 

>> Ubuntu beats out Windows 7 because it has more than one work station or

 

>> desktop. To get more than one with Windows 7, one has to spend money on

 

>> a third part program.

 

>

 

> While virtual desktops is useful for many, I myself don't have much use

 

> for them. However, MANY love that feature in Linux. There are clunky 3rd

 

> party apps to do that in Winders, but as usual they suck up resources,

 

> and are as smooth in implementation as a New York City road. LOL I

 

> installed an expose, or in Linux it is called Scale app in Win7 and

 

> while very useful, is WAY choppy/clunky compared to the Compiz version

 

> on the same machine.

 

>

 

>> File search

 

>>

 

>> Windows 7's file search is far superior to the one that comes with XP

 

>> but is slow compared to Ubuntu.

 

>

 

> Agreed.

 

>

 

>> File transfer

 

>>

 

>> Windows is still slower than Linux.

 

>

 

> Way agreed. I thought Win7 would be more improved, but alas no. I really

 

> don't know what posesses the MS developers, but they just can't seem to

 

> get it right in very important areas.

 

>

 

>> Internet speeds

 

>>

 

>> Windows is still slower than Linux.

 

>

 

> Agreed again. I surf WAY faster in Linux with Firefox, but then I surf

 

> way faster in Win7 with Firefox than IE. lol

 

>

 

>> Boot up time.

 

>>

 

>> Windows is still slower than Linux.

 

>

 

> Slightly on my machines, but not enough to be annoyed either way.

 

 

 

True.

 

 

>

 

>> Safe surfing

 

>>

 

>> Windows is still more vulnerable than Linux.

 

>

 

> WAY LOL (Enter the Frankenmonkey to attempt to debunk facts.)

 

 

 

If he sees "Alias" as the author he has no choice but to reply. He can't

 

help it. He's one of my Usenet groupies.

 

 

 

At My main

 

> place of employment, they CONSTANTLY fight with Winders and security

 

> problems regardless the elite security crap programs they install. I

 

> just sit back and laugh.

 

>

 

>> Games that come with Windows

 

>>

 

>> I prefer the ones that come with XP over 7. Even Spider Solitaire is

 

>> quicker in XP than Windows 7. Ubuntu comes with a lot more preloaded

 

>> than either 7 or XP. Ubuntu wins again.

 

>

 

> I'm not a "gamer" as I have WAY more important things to attend to, thus

 

> my rare appearance here, But between Linux and Winders, I get what I may

 

> need for temp distractions.

 

>

 

>> Wallpaper and themes

 

>>

 

>> Windows 7 does win on this one as the wallpapers and themes are pretty

 

>> cool in 7.

 

>

 

> Yes I totally agree, however if you install Wally in Linux and get some

 

> awesome wallpapers, you too can have wallpaper sideshows in Linux.

 

 

 

Lucid already comes with wallpaper sideshows. Is Wally in the repos?

 

 

 

No

 

> big deal. BUT, WTF is the deal with NO decent sound schemes in Linux??

 

> Particularly Ubuntu? It seems they don't give a rat's a** about any of

 

> that ear-candy. (Scull candy?)

 

 

 

I find the audio to have improved immensely with Lucid.

 

 

>

 

>> Cost:

 

>>

 

>> To have Windows 7 with PhotoShop and MS Office, we're talking more than

 

>> a grand you have to spend. Of course, with Ubuntu, the cost is nothing.

 

>

 

> Well to just buy the OS isn't all that bad for the latest ver, but add

 

> all the needed stuff for many people then yeah, the cost goes up

 

> exponentially.

 

>

 

>> Ubuntu wins again.

 

>>

 

>> All and all, Windows 7 is much better than XP but pales compared to

 

>> Ubuntu.

 

>

 

> I do like Win7 MUCH better than the previous releases and use it as

 

> needed, but for various reasons will still use Linux for other needs. I

 

> like 'em both and use them for the best of BOTH worlds. A-holes that

 

> can't grasp that concept are just sad, narrow-minded dopes, that are one

 

> dimensional morons.

 

>

 

> G'day

 

>

 

 

 

Yeah, both are available so why not have both?

 

 

 

--

 

Alias

The Differences and Similarities Between Windows 7 and UbuntuLucid Lynx

 

On 7/9/2010 1:35 PM, J. D. Slocomb wrote:

 

> On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 12:57:55 +0200, Alias

 

> wrote:

 

>

 

>> On 7/9/2010 2:44 AM, J. D. Slocomb wrote:

 

>>> On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 16:51:02 +0200, Alias

 

>>> wrote:

 

>>>

 

>>>> On 07/06/2010 05:21 PM, Alias wrote:

 

>>>>> Aero Glass vs. Compiz

 

>>>

 

>>>>> Cost:

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> To have Windows 7 with PhotoShop and MS Office, we're talking more than

 

>>>>> a grand you have to spend. Of course, with Ubuntu, the cost is nothing.

 

>>>>> Ubuntu wins again.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>

 

>>> Ah Ha! Alias can have Ubuntu WITH Photoshop and MS Office ... for

 

>>> free?

 

>>

 

>> Not needed when GIMP and Open Office are free and meet most people's needs.

 

>>

 

>>>

 

>>> Been downloading those pirated copies again haven't you.

 

>>

 

>> No and have you got proof of this other than your twisted and desperate

 

>> imagination?

 

>>

 

>>> Now we know

 

>>> why you have all the problems with Malware since as everyone knows

 

>>> the Warz are full of it.

 

>>

 

>> I don't download pirated software so that's one of your snarky theories

 

>> out the window and I make money cleaning malware off computers so, no, I

 

>> don't have a problem with malware, your desperate desire that I do

 

>> notwithstanding.

 

>>

 

>>>

 

>>>>> All and all, Windows 7 is much better than XP but pales compared to Ubuntu.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Another difference is that Windows 7 needs at least a gig of memory when

 

>>>> it's idle. Ubuntu only needs around 400 megs.

 

>>>

 

>>> And how did you determine that little gem of wisdom? By using the

 

>>> Ubuntu furnished Gnome System Monitor?

 

>>

 

>> Yep.

 

>>

 

>>> If so My Ubuntu almost always

 

>>> reads 20% of memory and 0 % of swap space, or approximately 800 meg of

 

>>> memory.

 

>>

 

>> You've probably installed something that's eating up your RAM. Check

 

>> what processes are running. Tell me the first two on the list.

 

>>

 

>>>

 

>>> 4 gigabytes = 4 X 1024 X 1024 X 1024 Right? Or are there some 1000's

 

>>> in the calculation somewhere? Well, to avoid an argument, call it

 

>>> 4,000,000,000 X .2 = 800,000,000...

 

>>

 

>> Gosh the man knows some arithmetic!

 

>>

 

>>>

 

>>> How come your Ubuntu uses so much less memory then mine? Or are you

 

>>> lying again Alias?

 

>>>

 

>>>

 

>>> Cheers,

 

>>>

 

>>> John D. Slocomb

 

>>> (jdslocombatgmail)

 

>>

 

>> I never lie and that's what my Ubuntu install is using when idle.

 

>

 

>

 

> You sure that you aren't spoofing us, are you? Or do you mean that the

 

> more or sell 160 tasks that are normally running in a Subunit

 

> installation are "idle".

 

>

 

> And I still suggest that you are blowing smoke. Try "top" and report

 

> back. I have 906,284 bytes of memory in use with nothing but "top"

 

> running and you are telling me that you have less?

 

>

 

> Or you read that in a magazine somewhere and are repeating it because

 

> you don't know how to tell what your system is doing?

 

>

 

> Cheers,

 

>

 

> John D. Slocomb

 

> (jdslocombatgmail)

 

 

 

Get back to me when you get over nit picking and lying about me.

 

--

 

Alias

The Differences and Similarities Between Windows 7 and UbuntuLucid Lynx

 

On 07/09/2010 01:35 PM, J. D. Slocomb wrote:

 

> On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 12:57:55 +0200, Alias

 

> wrote:

 

>

 

>> On 7/9/2010 2:44 AM, J. D. Slocomb wrote:

 

>>> On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 16:51:02 +0200, Alias

 

>>> wrote:

 

>>>

 

>>>> On 07/06/2010 05:21 PM, Alias wrote:

 

>>>>> Aero Glass vs. Compiz

 

>>>

 

>>>>> Cost:

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> To have Windows 7 with PhotoShop and MS Office, we're talking more than

 

>>>>> a grand you have to spend. Of course, with Ubuntu, the cost is nothing.

 

>>>>> Ubuntu wins again.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>

 

>>> Ah Ha! Alias can have Ubuntu WITH Photoshop and MS Office ... for

 

>>> free?

 

>>

 

>> Not needed when GIMP and Open Office are free and meet most people's needs.

 

>>

 

>>>

 

>>> Been downloading those pirated copies again haven't you.

 

>>

 

>> No and have you got proof of this other than your twisted and desperate

 

>> imagination?

 

>>

 

>>> Now we know

 

>>> why you have all the problems with Malware since as everyone knows

 

>>> the Warz are full of it.

 

>>

 

>> I don't download pirated software so that's one of your snarky theories

 

>> out the window and I make money cleaning malware off computers so, no, I

 

>> don't have a problem with malware, your desperate desire that I do

 

>> notwithstanding.

 

>>

 

>>>

 

>>>>> All and all, Windows 7 is much better than XP but pales compared to Ubuntu.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Another difference is that Windows 7 needs at least a gig of memory when

 

>>>> it's idle. Ubuntu only needs around 400 megs.

 

>>>

 

>>> And how did you determine that little gem of wisdom? By using the

 

>>> Ubuntu furnished Gnome System Monitor?

 

>>

 

>> Yep.

 

>>

 

>>> If so My Ubuntu almost always

 

>>> reads 20% of memory and 0 % of swap space, or approximately 800 meg of

 

>>> memory.

 

>>

 

>> You've probably installed something that's eating up your RAM. Check

 

>> what processes are running. Tell me the first two on the list.

 

>>

 

>>>

 

>>> 4 gigabytes = 4 X 1024 X 1024 X 1024 Right? Or are there some 1000's

 

>>> in the calculation somewhere? Well, to avoid an argument, call it

 

>>> 4,000,000,000 X .2 = 800,000,000...

 

>>

 

>> Gosh the man knows some arithmetic!

 

>>

 

>>>

 

>>> How come your Ubuntu uses so much less memory then mine? Or are you

 

>>> lying again Alias?

 

>>>

 

>>>

 

>>> Cheers,

 

>>>

 

>>> John D. Slocomb

 

>>> (jdslocombatgmail)

 

>>

 

>> I never lie and that's what my Ubuntu install is using when idle.

 

>

 

>

 

> You sure that you aren't spoofing us, are you? Or do you mean that the

 

> more or sell 160 tasks that are normally running in a Subunit

 

> installation are "idle".

 

>

 

> And I still suggest that you are blowing smoke. Try "top" and report

 

> back. I have 906,284 bytes of memory in use with nothing but "top"

 

> running and you are telling me that you have less?

 

>

 

> Or you read that in a magazine somewhere and are repeating it because

 

> you don't know how to tell what your system is doing?

 

>

 

> Cheers,

 

>

 

> John D. Slocomb

 

> (jdslocombatgmail)

 

 

 

Using TOP, it's more RAM, 800 MB. I wonder why it's different when using

 

the System Monitor which shows half that. Nonetheless, it's less than

 

Win 7 uses and Ubuntu is much quicker to open programs than Windows 7.

 

 

 

BTW, if you don't stop accusing me of theft and lying and if you don't

 

stop your nit picking crap, you'll join Frank in the ignore section.

 

 

 

--

 

Alias

The Differences and Similarities Between Windows 7 and UbuntuLucid Lynx

 

On 7/9/2010 5:07 AM, Alias wrote:

 

> On 07/09/2010 01:35 PM, J. D. Slocomb wrote:

 

>> On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 12:57:55 +0200, Alias

 

>> wrote:

 

>>

 

>>> On 7/9/2010 2:44 AM, J. D. Slocomb wrote:

 

>>>> On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 16:51:02 +0200, Alias

 

>>>> wrote:

 

>>>>

 

>>>>> On 07/06/2010 05:21 PM, Alias wrote:

 

>>>>>> Aero Glass vs. Compiz

 

>>>>

 

>>>>>> Cost:

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> To have Windows 7 with PhotoShop and MS Office, we're talking more

 

>>>>>> than

 

>>>>>> a grand you have to spend. Of course, with Ubuntu, the cost is

 

>>>>>> nothing.

 

>>>>>> Ubuntu wins again.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Ah Ha! Alias can have Ubuntu WITH Photoshop and MS Office ... for

 

>>>> free?

 

>>>

 

>>> Not needed when GIMP and Open Office are free and meet most people's

 

>>> needs.

 

>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Been downloading those pirated copies again haven't you.

 

>>>

 

>>> No and have you got proof of this other than your twisted and desperate

 

>>> imagination?

 

>>>

 

>>>> Now we know

 

>>>> why you have all the problems with Malware since as everyone knows

 

>>>> the Warz are full of it.

 

>>>

 

>>> I don't download pirated software so that's one of your snarky theories

 

>>> out the window and I make money cleaning malware off computers so, no, I

 

>>> don't have a problem with malware, your desperate desire that I do

 

>>> notwithstanding.

 

>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>>>> All and all, Windows 7 is much better than XP but pales compared

 

>>>>>> to Ubuntu.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Another difference is that Windows 7 needs at least a gig of memory

 

>>>>> when

 

>>>>> it's idle. Ubuntu only needs around 400 megs.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> And how did you determine that little gem of wisdom? By using the

 

>>>> Ubuntu furnished Gnome System Monitor?

 

>>>

 

>>> Yep.

 

>>>

 

>>>> If so My Ubuntu almost always

 

>>>> reads 20% of memory and 0 % of swap space, or approximately 800 meg of

 

>>>> memory.

 

>>>

 

>>> You've probably installed something that's eating up your RAM. Check

 

>>> what processes are running. Tell me the first two on the list.

 

>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> 4 gigabytes = 4 X 1024 X 1024 X 1024 Right? Or are there some 1000's

 

>>>> in the calculation somewhere? Well, to avoid an argument, call it

 

>>>> 4,000,000,000 X .2 = 800,000,000...

 

>>>

 

>>> Gosh the man knows some arithmetic!

 

>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> How come your Ubuntu uses so much less memory then mine? Or are you

 

>>>> lying again Alias?

 

>>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Cheers,

 

>>>>

 

>>>> John D. Slocomb

 

>>>> (jdslocombatgmail)

 

>>>

 

>>> I never lie and that's what my Ubuntu install is using when idle.

 

>>

 

>>

 

>> You sure that you aren't spoofing us, are you? Or do you mean that the

 

>> more or sell 160 tasks that are normally running in a Subunit

 

>> installation are "idle".

 

>>

 

>> And I still suggest that you are blowing smoke. Try "top" and report

 

>> back. I have 906,284 bytes of memory in use with nothing but "top"

 

>> running and you are telling me that you have less?

 

>>

 

>> Or you read that in a magazine somewhere and are repeating it because

 

>> you don't know how to tell what your system is doing?

 

>>

 

>> Cheers,

 

>>

 

>> John D. Slocomb

 

>> (jdslocombatgmail)

 

>

 

> Using TOP, it's more RAM, 800 MB. I wonder why it's different when using

 

> the System Monitor which shows half that. Nonetheless, it's less than

 

> Win 7 uses and Ubuntu is much quicker to open programs than Windows 7.

 

>

 

> BTW, if you don't stop accusing me of theft and lying and if you don't

 

> stop your nit picking crap, you'll join Frank in the ignore section.

 

>

 

hehehe...face it cock sucker, he has caught you lying so many times it's

 

no longer funny.

 

You are a known and admitted lying POS asshole loser scumbag creep. So

 

either STFU, get lost or else accept the role you've made for yourself.